Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWPO201900061 Plan - Revision 2020-12-22Drainage Area A Drainage Area A Land Cover facres) A Soils BSoils CSoils DSoils Totals Land Coverts Forest/Open Space (acres) 0.00 0.00 Managed Turf (acres) 018 0.18 0.20 Impervious Cover (acres) 0,70 0.70 0.95 Taal 0.88 Stormwater Best Manaeement Practices (RR = Runoff Reduction) Total Phosphorus Available for Removal in D.A.A(lb/yr) 1.fi0 Post Development Treatment Volume in D.A.A(k") 2,545 -Select from droodown lists-- Runoff Managed Turt Impervious Volume from Remalnilg Total BMP plrosphorLLc Phosphorus Untreated phosphT-P aining Practice Reduction CredttArea Runoff Cover CrMit Upstream Runoff Treatment Removal Load from Phosphorus RemovhorusCredit Downstream Practice to be (%) (acres) Area (acres) practice (fta) Reduction (R") Volume (k"] Volume (R") tlffcfency(%( Upstream Load to practicd (I h) Employed practicespb) Practicepb) 14.a. Manufactured Treatment Device- 0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hydrodynamic 14.1b. Manufactured Treatment Device -Filtering 0 0.50 0 0 1,724 1,724 40 O.OD LON 0.43 0.65 14,c. Manufactured Treatment Device -Generic 0 0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEQ Virginia Runoff Reduction Method New Development Compliance Spreadsheet - Version 3.0 2011 BMP Standards and Specifications 02013 Draft BLIP Standards and Specifications Prgeet Nema: dab inpuHells Georgetown HytlmNla Data: 10/23/2019 mnstantv'lues BMp Oesign SpenfrooNans bst. 2013 DmR Stds & Specs calculadan cells Site Information Project (Treatment Volume and Loads) cover A Soils I BSoils Cson, DSon, Torus rorest/Open Spare (saes) -- ore sturtcd, prmeaed roreaIva n space or reforested anal o.m Managed Tut(acres)-- disturbed raded for yamsormrertudio be rn.edlmamged rmp-1-cwerlacres) Constants RunoffCoetOclelts Rv Annual Rainfall Cmchesl 63 ASone BSoils Cgoes ISSoils Target Rainfall Event(inches) Lou Porest/OPen5mce 0.02 O.m 0.04 0.05 Total Phosphorus(m) ENc(rrp/L) M26 Managed Turt 0.15 0.20 0.22 0.25 Total Nitrogen Un)EMe(mg/U L86 Imperviouscavcr 0.95 DSS 0.95 0.95 Target TP Load(o/arm/yr) M41 Pi(omitless correction factor) U90 Forest/Open Space Cover(arres) 0,00 Treatment Valume 0o5H4 (acre-ft) Treatment Volume(cubie feet) 2,545 TP bad (Ib/yr) l.m TN lnad(lb/,) adormatienalpur oseson 11.44 Weighted Rv(forest) 0.m %Forest 0% Managed Turf Cover (acres) 0.18 Weighted In, (turf) Q20 %Managed Turf 2096 Im pemlous Cover (acres) M70 To (ine,rvious) M95 %Impervious aT9e Site Area lacrea) 086 Site Rv "a Multiple Outlet Design Outflow Total Discharge: Water Surface Elevation: Tailwater Elevation: Detention Base Elevation: Outlet #1: MH, Drop Pipe Riser Top Elev: Riser Base Elev: Riser Diameter: Orifice Coefficient: Weir Coefficient: Culvert Length: Culvert Diameter: Culvert Invert Out: Culvert Friction Coefficient: Culvert Entrance Loss Coefficient: Discharge: Outlet #2: 01, Orifice Shape: Diameter: Invert Elevation: Coefficient: Number of Openings: Discharge: Velocity: Outlet #3: PLATE, Weir Shape: Crest Length: Invert Elevation: Coefficient: Number of Openings: Discharge: Velocity: 646.0193 cfs 610.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 602.00 ft 593.00 ft 60.00 in 0.60 3.33 20.00 ft 18.00 in 594.00 ft 0.01 0.10 37.74 cfS Circular 3.00 in 597.10 ft 0.60 0.88 cfs 17.20 ft/s Rectangular w/o Contracted End 5.00 ft 599.00 ft 3.33 607.44 Cfs 11.04 ft/S Nitrogen Removal Efficiency(%) Nitrogen Load from Upstream Practices(lbs) Untreated Nitrogen Load to Practice (lbs) Nitrogen Removed By Practice (lbs) Remaining Nitrogen Load (lbs) 0 0.00 O.OD 0,00 0.00 0 0.00 7.74 0.00 7.74 0 0.00 0.00 0OD 0.00 Site Results (Water Quality Compliance) Area Checks FOREST/OPEN SPACE (ac) IMPERVIOUSCOVER(ac) IMPERVIOUS COVER TREATED (ac) MANAGED TURF AREA (ac) MANAGEDTURFAREATREATED lac) AREACHECK DA A D.A B 0.A. C 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.000.180.00 MDDO�Do0.00 0.000.00 0.00 D.00 OK OK. OK. Site Treatment Volume (W)�° Runoff Reduction Volume and TP By Drainage Area RUNOFF REDUCTION VOLUME ACHIEVED (it') TP LOAD AVAILABLE FOR REMOVAL (Ib/yr) TP LOAD REDUCTION ACHIEVED (Ib/yr) TP LOAD REMAINING (Ib/yr) OA A D.A. B DA. c DA. D D.A. E Toru 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.60 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 LED OAS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OAS 1.17 0D0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.17 NIFHOGENMADREDUCTIONACHIEVED (Ib/yr) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Phosphorus FINAL POST -DEVELOPMENT TP MAD (lb' 1.60 TP LOAD REDUCTION REQUIRED gb/yr) 1.24 TP LOAD REDUCTION ACHIEVED(lb/,) om TP LOAD REMAINING (lb/,): 1.17 REMAINING TP LOAD REDUCTION REQUIRED (Ib/yr): 0.81 Total Nitrogen (For Information Purposes) POST -DEVELOPMENT MAD(11, 1 Z NITROGEN LOAD REDUCTION ACHIEVED (R Z/ 0.00 REMAINING POST -DEVELOPMENT NITROGEN LOAD (Ib/yr) 11M TOTAL IMPERVIOUS OWERTREATED(ac) 0.50 AREA CHEM OK TOTAL MANAGED TURF AREATIREATH) (a,)l 0.00 AREA CHEM OK. TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL REQUIRED ON SHE(lb/,) 1.24 TOTAL PHOSPHORUS AVAILABLE FORREMOVALIN DA.A116/yr) 1.60 TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVED WITHOUT RUNOFF REDUCI°N PPACTICEB IN DA.A IIb/yr) 0.43 TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REMOV E D WITH RUNOFF REDUCTION PRACTICESD.A.APb/yr) 0.00 TOTAL PH OSPHORUS LOAD REDUCTION ACHIEVED IN DA. AIIb/yr) 0.43 TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REMAINING AFTERAPPLYING BMP LOAD REDUCTIONS IN DA A(Ib/yr) 1.17 SEE WATER QUALITY COMPLIANCE TAB FOR SITE COMPLIANCE CALCULATIONS NITROGEN REMOVED WITH RUNOFF REDUCTION PRACTICES IN DA. A(Ib/yr) 0.00 NITROGEN HEMMED WITHOUT RUNOFF REDUCTION PRACTICES IN DA A(lbhr) I, u TOTAL NFROG EN REMOVED IN DA A (Ib/yr) 0.00 OUTLET STRUCTURE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 5.0' 599.10 595.70 DI-3B Curb Inlet Calculations Location = On grade Compute by: Known Q Curb Length (ft) = 8.00 Q (cfs) = 1.64 Throat Height (in) = 6.00 Grate Area (sqft) = -0- Highlighted Grate Width (ft) = -0- Q Total (cfs) = 1.64 Grate Length (ft) = -0- Q Capt (cfs) = 1.59 Q Bypass (cfs) = 0.05 Gutter Depth at Inlet (in) = 4.84 Slope, Sw (ft/ft) = 0.080 Efficiency (%) = 97 Slope, Sx (ft/ft) = 0.025 Gutter Spread (ft) = 5.06 Local Depr (in) = 2.00 Gutter Vel (ft/s) = 3.81 Gutter Width (ft) = 2.00 Bypass Spread (ft) = 0.83 Gutter Slope (%) = 2.50 Bypass Depth (in) = 0.80 Gutter n-value = 0.016 DI-3C Curb Inlet Calculations Location = Sag Compute by: Known Q Curb Length (ft) = 6.00 Q (cfs) = 0.70 Throat Height (in) = 6.00 Grate Area (sqft) = -0- Highlighted Grate Width (ft) = -0- Q Total (cfs) = 0.70 Grate Length (ft) = -0- Q Capt (cfs) = 0.70 Q Bypass (cfs) = -0- Gutter Depth at Inlet (in) = 4.52 Slope, Sw (ft/ft) = 0.080 Efficiency (%) = 100 Slope, Sx (fttft) = 0.025 Gutter Spread (ft) = 4.00 Local Depr (in) = 2.00 Gutter Val (ft/s) = 3.81 Gutter Width (ft) = 2.00 Bypass Spread (ft) = -0- Gutter Slope (%) = -0- Bypass Depth (in) = -0- Gutter n-value = 0.120 5.0' STD. MANHOLE LID FOR ACCESS - STD. MANHOLE STEPS OUTLET JUNCTION BOX 9.0' H X 5.0' W 3" 0 ORIFICE 0 59; -.16 595.70 S' ORMWAXER DETENTION SYSTEM AND YOUT S 0� IS BASED ON DESIGN/DETAILS VERIFIED AND PROVIDED BY ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS (ADS) UNDER SEPARATE PACKET. THE PROPOSED MC-3500 CHAMBER ,SYSTEM CURRENTLY CONTAINS A DEQ APPROVED PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL RATE OF 407.. THE CURRENT REMOVAL RATE HAS BEEN APPLIED TO THE VRRM SPREADSHEET AND OFFSITE NUTRIENT CREDITS WILL BE PURCHASED TO SATISFY THE REMAINING PHOSPHORUS LOAD REDUCTION REQUIREMENT OF 0.81 LB/YR. 3.4'H INTERNAL WEIR PLATE -4-41 H x 5.0' W FOR OUTLET FLOW CONTROL. INV @ 599.0& 599.10 10 YEAR WSE-598.85 598.94 15" INFLOW HDPE PIPE FROM DETENTION CHAMBERS 15" INFLOW @ 596.58 1 YEAR WSE 597.20 6" ADS N-12 DUAL WALL PERFORATED HDPE UNDERDRAIN @ 595.70 INVERT 22.49 LF OF 18" HP PIPE LOW LF OF 18" H Outlet Barrel @ 0.54 % OUTLET BARREL r5.0%_ INV IN: 595.70 INV. IN=595� i INV OUT: 595.59 INV. OUT=g9+99 N No detention outlet structure 595.70 /3\ tF N W U') Q W W � E.-- Co J � � w� w U)W Q U1 w� WM c'Io Loco C wXc) Z WI_ ape ///, 11-r 20 0 20 IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN SCALE: 1"=20' Y Detention Chambers Stage -Storage Report Y > Elev(Ft) Storage(CF) torage(CY) y 595.529A8- 0.000 0. 00 y 596.53 §96.900 2vvmeT9 1457.46 77. 2 597.53 3781.57 195. 4 r 599.53 7899.32 308.72 >'601.20 -•"� 89 10136.70 359.974 'torag,(Acre-Ft) 00 8 0.1 0.191 0.223 \ rn r U ~ N U U Q Z ZaJ J O O 0to _to J_i > U v1 h0) Q T MZi W H f2 CE 00 a_ a Z ¢ - xIr UQ ❑ ::) °18 O0) W0 M OQ J Z v ZO O> N � o x Cn Wa IL Z o v m CE i 1L Ir N W N V w U)a F_r> 0 Q J U) Ld Q 0 J T a U Z > W W O d 0 H 00 rn Ir U z O d U U W ULI 0 ill. Cj Oz IrF��y�y`a H H I- W W LU OLU 1 O O 0_ LU N W z z Q C) ; 0 N N N O Q \ \ N N 0 O N \ -i N rra 00 O N h z DESIGNED BY: JLF SMP DRAWN BY: I JLFNVN 'CHECKED BY: I JLT ALTH op `4. < � 9 Jimmy L. Taggart Lic. No. ° 22841 `111116��a11810NAL z Q J 0- U z J W W Q J Q Q z Q = LL LLi Lu m L.LJ°zm � Q LLI Q O o O UJ 0 ° � I 0 Q rLU V 0 Ir > DATE: OCTOBER 25 2019 SCALE: 1 "=20' JOB: GTH FILE: 19.0125 SHEET: 1 OF 9 G:\mid"Roj"c CMIP j""ak' lB1a0125\ENGINEERINGpW 19.0125Ge"rg" nHydmulicV MP20,dng r PRE -DEVELOPMENT SITE TR55 y y AREA = 0.8 8 A C Tc= 8.0 MIN CN=59 � Draln eAreaA crest/Open Spare-mNndbefirestepi.nd forest/open spare or reforestetl land Aea(aces CN Managed Turf nic, b disturbed, ffaded brya ds or other [u d to bemd, tested! managed Area (acres CN Impervious Cover Area acres CN RVowelopea (watershed -inch) with no Runoff Reductii RV,,.Ilea (watershed -Inch) with Runoff Reducth Adjusted CN' Drainage Area ASails I BSDiIs [Soils Dsails Total Area (aces): 0.98 ONCLUS ON: POST- DEVELOPMENT I , Forest/Open Space undisturbed, protected Area acres 0.00 0.00 am RunoR Reduction forest/open spare orrefores[edland CN 30 55 ]0 ]] volume e: o IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHANNEL PROTECTION SECTION I Managed Turf-distu bed,no. ed/rounded ramsDramer Arealarres7 Dog 018 74 000 B.3.A) OF 9VAC25-870-66 OF VIRGINIA LAW; THE SITE AREA = 0.8 8 AC urtto be mowed/managed CN 39 61 0 80 Impervious Cover Area°Naas °98 98 9°° 9°° MAXIMUM PEAK FLOW RATE FROM THE ONE-YEAR TR55 Tc= 6.0 MIN CNlpea, 24-HOUR STORM FOLLOWING THE LAND -DISTURBING r 90 ACTIVITY APPEARS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE I CN= 9 0 1-yearstorm 2-yearstorm 10-yearstorm NERGY BALANCE METHODOLOGY: I RVDevelopm (watershed -inch) with no Runoff Reduction" 2.02 2.62 A.a3 �. RVDeelapea(watershed-inch) with Runoff Reduction' 2.02 2.62 4./3 QDEVELOPED S LF.*(QPRE-DEVELOPED* 3 I Adjusted [Nat 90 \ 90 BD \ -1 _ I I I RVPRE-DEVELOPED)/RVDEVELOP EXISTING I \ \ I _ - - L,\ IMPERVIOUS WOODS _ _10.02 S 0.90*(0.27*0. W W I r I I I 0.70AC I ' .y .y 0.73AC � I \I a CHANNEL PROTECTION COMPLIANCE SUMMARY TABLE I 0.038 WITH Y' ORIFICE 1 `1 / 1 I II Applicable Channel Protection Criteria II `0.268 WITH 3" ORIFICE (RECOM (ENDED) \ \ \ I \ 11 I 1 Ipll I I Cwitions alterlaA Criteria CriledaC s NI L Discharge visit. Project consistent IF 1�s it Point Anal s of \ I J - \ Analysis (b °�, Vx V....w. vAlh design ored of l]e.°xam RV...w.,m IF wa rei Rv.-., 5 aV,..... reslgred .,w.,N ..w.e RV.ma.>.e Ry,,,.,,,,.. _ 80' PROPOSED EXISTING \ rn 1 I LI IMPERVIOUS I 11 0.07AC l I \ � \ TMP 60E-1 � � wM I ,i 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.00 Mount Raluetlan 30 55 70 ]] Volume (R'): 0 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 39 01 ]d B0 0.000.00 0.00 98 98 9S 9S Chat, storm 2-year storm 10-yearstorm 0.32 0.5] 1.5] 032 057 15] 59 59 59 system RIGHT TURN TAPER. #1 ❑ Restored \ ❑ Nature tl rEs 0.02 2.02 0.9 0.27 0.32 0.040 5 0.078 ® Natures bbb TURF Channel Protection Criteria _ G A. The stave mws[er conveyance Watson ewrveys the post -development peak flow rate bram n the twoWar 24bour Sharon event without causing erosion of 0.1 UAG the "am (Vs must be shown to be nff-erosive) W M B. The development project, in combination with other stamwater runoff. Is consistent with%a design parametersofthe restated stornvmter cmvayance and the restated stormwater ceowyance system is functioning as designed \ DYNAMIC INVESTMENT I I \ C. The discharge from the development satisfies the Energy Balance requirement I CAPITAL ENTERPRISES °° °°`°'R✓°""° °)slFe(° ,',°'Ry.......°' where'. - \I ZONED: C-1 1 °m i° e Bepeak few rate of runoff from the developed site - \ I USE: OFFICE BUILDING IF °o" animpthe rme entfactbran 8 for dosed sure, developed9foreon 1acr IF eni merlon rteachno.8 for sites>tde,eopforsites s1ecra) te RVe s mm Bite volume w rate of runoff from thebased on prep leved elo RVP.re,a°m° - bite wlsmectrunoff bran the site based on pre -developed conditions EXISTING -- I 1 IF B 0 08AC \ / ) 1 x / / I \ \ / ) 1 Ex c / IPOST-DEV TC PATH 6.0 M I N 5gp- OMEN 5 ♦ p /W /* y/ p p \ 599- MAN j S M ),/ .p T 4_ o� � \� 6"PRDS p p p �W /W _O ttpGE SEMI F W � a W W yr W W EX. W yr W W W yr IF � I I. \ 5 W W 1`WC'9`YW /W W W W W W W \ 11 O I I T 1 KWOP W+6" V✓P� W W •Y W W_ W W W \ �� I `I./ / )n 6" 0tAK W I I IWW WW �WW � •Y WW WW W WW W WW _ tKO� II I �� I I//f�■■ _ y q� = \ II II 1\ I WI1'Iv I .wY/ /W/ Jvi" I WI WidW W W Wv W Wv W •wY W Wv W Wv W Wv WIhw+III _ I II OOA2� \0 X 8"MPL 8"MPL 24'PINE X 24PINE 8 18"(I \18"9AII_ 18.E i I \ I1\4 I / I I 414 SV- XI 2+ OR ) XI 2" OR 86A24"PINE +24"PINE + % T - I X W L x' U 18"PINE 18"POP 8"OA I I 3 P P vI W/ W W W W W W W W W N I// \ I 18"PINE 18"POP 8"0A I I \ X + + 8"OAK I I Y n Y W W W W W W W W W \ X + \ P 8 PO 1�"PINE � 8"OAK / 8 N W W W W W •Y W 8 IN ' / Pl1O 5"P+IrnN10"POP 5"PIN 24"P+P 10"POP + II \ 24"P+IP 3030/" NE 12 AK OP 30 POP INE 12 AK M 10 OR +18M10+ 2 °' \ T \ TI J P�OIyP1/I_ It I III'� I ' III I III co + 24"PINE 15"POP 10"MPPOP Cn 24"PINE 15"+POP 1O"MPPOP + ' - I-• I II S� X O Q X10 10 POP 2L0C i24"P P 2 P 11I I< Q W 0 OrMP 15"CH Y I ri1Q X 15"CH Y I' 1. 1. 12:�ASS 3 0 X W W W W W W W W W \ 2fl MPL \ I Q X+'CHRY 24"CHRY 18"MPL .� N24"CHRY 18 18'POQ .g �. �. �. �. �. �. �. �. I\+- � 2 REEN \ 8"MP + \ \\ W W W p p p W GREEN \ 8 MP + \ \ \\ TIAL I a 1O CH \ I I W y W W W W W W W W W ITIAL I I I I n EA II I I I I WI W W W W W W W W /J I 'EA h = 12"POP On L � �Y W W W W W W W W W W W /W W 12"POP 0^ '/ I / + 0 0� /8"MP �1 10"MF'L I ( I I I W I .p .v w W W w W W w W W\ W I \ / + 0 0� MP �1 10"MF'L I ( I I I II r LINK FENS I ( y k W W W W W W V W W W �M v NLINK FENer I ( 1 0"♦�OP 18"�P� I 2+ P I W W W W p p p p p p p p p I 6"POP �� � 011 1 8"IMP 6"POP I 2+ P FI �f I 8"OAK I I W W J W W W W W W W v W\ NCHMARK \"1 1 8"0AK /. I I 1 yI ✓ + / I NCHMARK 8^S'C I 18°It0 204POP W W W W W W W W W W W W W AAFFIC BOX 8^S'C I 18"�0 r% ::a AFFIC BOX SITE + 1° W W W W W W W W I E VATION=614.7� SITE K + 10 E VATION=614.7y X+ DISCHARGE Poo W W W W \ X+ I DISCHARGE 2"Poo /V 20"POP + W w W 124r OC W W W W W W W W W W W W � "e 2O"POP + + POINT #1 2 P + I 2" 1 W + (DELMU) W W I I / + POINT #1 2 P X + " e 12�Po I w -"'-� w v, w .g w v- /.g �`Z' X + 12�Po 12 / P �0 \ � / I I 12 P%P I/� M W W W W W W W II W W W y W y W / � 8"POP PL 12"L�C m W W W W W W/ 8"POP \ /V X 0 42"OAKX2 I 2n O `w g+ w p w v24"MAP X 0 42"OAKX2 '� W W \0 W) W W W W W W W W Y' f W 1 1 ✓ IIU <r30a �� / / I // 'I}.'yJI` + W 1 W W W W 24"PO 18' OAK 0 12� POLE--' 7�4"OAF5,X4 WWW���/// / I � /V � � - .' � \ /J / / I TOPLIGH E 8 - / 1 "PINE 9 y2 / I 8/M`PL W / 36" OAKX2 \ I / �[ 8"POP' Warr 0P� +* q{I}P-9P / 1 10' �PL O K ` W W �6"Gl RY p �SYC W W J (�DLEADD)D / \ � n' / h9P/ �� 10"MPL/ �W v W p"MPL 1"(OAK �1�PWEW p I '\0 V- -PR E- EVE�OPMENT ��I W W 4"POP W W b\0 air PRE-DEV Runoff Hydrograph: TR-55 Tabular Hydrograph Method `�b�� TC PATH Input Data: I I W W W"��� 8.0 M I N Rainfall Distribution Type: Type II I + W ' 0 `\a Rainfall Depth: 3.04 in Base Flow: 0.000 cfs V la/P Interpolation: On I I U / I Subarea Downstream Area CN TC Tt 0 lame Subareas (acre) (min) (min) SITE -PRE 0.88 59 8.00 8.00 Computed Results: / Peak Discharge (Qp): 0.272 cfs Time to Peak: 12.10 hire Runoff Volume: 0.01 acre-ft 1 / 36" OAKX2 I 10'i "O K •�� / �`/ -POST- DEVELOPMENT Runoff Hydrog ar ph: TR-55 Tabular Hydrograph Method - -- --- I I 4 Input Data: Rainfall Distribution Type: Type II Rainfall Depth: 3.04 in Base Flow: 0.000 cfs la/P Interpolation: On \ Subarea Downstream Area CN TC Tt / Reservoir Routing: Storage Indication Method lame Subareas (acre) (min) (min) SITE -POST 0.88 90 6.00 6.00 Input Files: Inflow Hydrograph Curve: Computed Results: Stage -Storage Curve: Stage -Discharge Curve: Peak Discharge (Qp): 2.807 cfs Time to Peak: 12.10 hire Results: Runoff Volume: 0.09 acre-ft Inflow Peak Flow: I ' Inflow Peak Time: Routed Peak Flow: / Routed Peak Time: Maximum Storage: Maximum Elevation: iiff"I'M n-' REV-1YR_POST.hyd DIET PIPES.cop DET PIPES.stg 2.81 cfs �0 0 12.10 hr 0.02.02 cfs hr 0.1328 acre-feet SCALE: �=20' .132 597.46 ft 20 40 0 Ic U o m N W W ~ N n Q O z IZ5 J 'm COO Q (0 0) JJ> U Cn Q W ~ fin OU ¢� ]] _y D_ 0 Z _ Ir O "0 ON wU � W _j J 60 Z O> FD N o x Wq rA Ir CE Ir aLW 111 N 1 N m W M U Q r> Z U Q Q J D A UZ> 0 =WW O aor0 a U Z O d K U 0 W a h Oz w IL W O 2 2 o tz g g w o o Z Z U Zw p Q > > U U > O N OW N O CD CD N Q O N N Z N a DESIGNED BY:I JLF SMP DRAWN BY: I JIL •CHECKED Rs' 1JLT I'T H OF vr+P �!I Jimmy L. Taggart Lic. No. 22841 W4 100:aSIONAL g U zJ LU W � Q Q III rr LL_ Q J a_ Z z ir o Q > = J U z �oz W W LL m O Q Q O� W 17- ° < w 0 0 OI-- W z Er O z Q U Q LLJ C DATE: OCTOBER 25 2019 SCALE: 1"=20' JOB: GTH FILE: 19.0125 SHEET: V 21191 I G:\rmid"Roje \CMIPmjentsk' 11 190125\ENGINEERINGWpW 19.0125Gearge nHydm licV MP20d g r Drainage Arm ASoils g5oils CShcs Dsoils Tmal Area (aces): 0.31 Drainage AreaD Forest/Open Space- undisturbed, protected Area (acres) 0.00 0.17 am 0.00 Runoff ReductionPOST- DEVELOPMENT Forest/Open Space- undisturbed, protected Amaacres) PRE -DEVELOPMENT \ / forest/open space or refomcmd land CN 30 55 70 JJ Volume ff N Managed Turf- disturbed, graded for yards or other Area(acres) 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 Managed! Turf- disturbed, graded for yards or other Area(acres) tudto be mowed/manaed CN 39 61 74 80 tudto be mowedmanaetl CN DRAINAGE AREA= . 31 AC mpPN1OY5COVef g Area(acres) R.11 D.00 n9R DRAINAGE AREA= . 7 2 AC m�r"inas erg Area (acres, CN 98 98 98 98 CN TR55 Tc= 8.0 MIN CN,,A.� TR55 Tc= 6.0 MIN 71 CN = 71 \ I 1-year storm 2-year storm 10-year storm C N 9 2 RVDe 1Wrd1 (wntershed-inch) with no Runoff Reduction I\ RVll-loped (wetershed-inchJ with n , Runoff Reduction• 078 1.18 2.56 RVoewloped funtershed-inch) with Runoff Reduction \ \ RVoevelaped(eotershed-Inchf with Runoff Redu=n4 OJB 1.18 2.% Adjusted cN4 � Atllusma cn4 1_ 73 1 73 \ \ EXISTING \ I I �_ - y\ L 1 I IMPERVIOUS \ I I I I W W WOODS 0.60AC r - ° 0.17AG IL J I \ EXISTING \ I \ m II wV l IMPERVIOUS 0.1 1 AC l I \ � \ \ TMP 60E-1 � � wM A ,sous BSolls 05olls Dsous Total Area (acres): 0.72 ONCLUSION: I , 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 Runoff Reduction 30 55 ID TJ Volume(R): 0 IN REFERENCE TO FLOOD PROTECTION SECTION C.1), THE 1z 000 a. 39 61 J4 80 SITE'S POINT OF DISCHARGE RELEASES CAPTURED 0.39 8R 0.99 o. 998 98 8 8 98 STORMWATER INTO A CONVEYANCE SYSTEM THAT, 9DNwADI FOLLOWING LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY, CONFINES THE 92 POST -DEVELOPMENT PEAK FLOW RATE FROM THE storm 2-yearstorm 10-yearstorm -10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM EVENT WITHIN THE 2.20 1 2.81 1 4,65 2.20 2.e1 Q6g STORMWATER CONVE 91 0.41 CFS QjoPOSQWPRET DD S DEVELOPED1.223 CCFS 3 I 1 80' PRbPOSED I 1 wv lip RIGHT TURN TAPER. 1 _ - TMP 60E-1 J wM 1 DYNAMIC INVESTMENT O i CAPITAL ENTERPRISES 1 ZONED: C-1 I USE: OFFICE BUILDING II 1 I ( I POST-DEV TC PATH 6.0 MIN G I I 18.0' I . 24 PINE + / \ ¢I 1•°\°. I 4 PINE I\+ + �X + 30POP � 18INE 18"POP \ 18INE"P8"Oaa"P18"POPI 8 IN 8PO\ 12 PINE I 8"OAK a 8 IN PO (1n + 10"POP 5"PIN 10"POP 5 PIN N 24"P++Pl 24"P++ l 30" 2 OR \ I I 1 1 + x \ \ 30"POP) X 1 \ \ INE + 12 AK 30 POP w I4 , \ \ "INE + 12\ AK \ \ \ 18"M 10 OP _ \ \ \ 18"M 10 OP / ■I� :1 Ior- 15"POP 10"MPL + 1ip,p W 15""POP10"MPL + "POP''`�24"PINE +f 1 O C 124"PINE ATl + ,11 I ::::` LW G \ X 10"POP �\ 1 / I 12"LOC p '` L r^ \ X 10"POP rn ` ' I - I 1 r^ 24"PPPI I L \ / 2 PI II _-===_,r \ I e j 0 MP \ 15"CH Y I I �+ I 12"SASS \ �° \ W \ I e j 0 MP \ 15"CH Y I I II� tt ..` 10"CHRY e 20'MPL 24"CHRY X++ 1 j 18°MPL \ \ \ \ 18'POP \ 1' REEN + L \ "'[[[+ \ \ I I I � 1 L � ; \ X10' CHRY 1 n BnM� + REEN 8'MP \ 1 \ C 24"CHRY 18'MPL ' 1 ►t \ 6 10 CH ` I 6 1yI 10" CH \ I P I 1 , 1 TIAL l I I I III I /\\ ITIAL I I I I I I n �': "Mp EA \ w x,I ��"1✓� +1 � 8 IIII�I ' II+I"�II\I\I n1M II ) WW WW W W W W W W \ W1r a.\EA 12"POP 0" w 12"POPI IU r 0I MP 10MPa`\ X10I"MP LINK FE00QJ NLINK FENer 0 0V 0 OR p 2"P \' POP "O6"POP i�+ II� I/ ' Bump ump I +III\ I\2 8"OAK 8"OAK/I1I + BENCHMARK ( I TRAFFIC BOX 8 C8 C 20"POP 614.7� 18"�0 SITE + ,ELEVATION"Po"+ o "+ IDISCHARGE 20"POP 2" P 20POP 2" �o POINT #1 1210C =► + POINT #1+ 2 (DEAD) x + 12�Po �*�v 12 RPQ W9,-, W WV 12 P 8"POP 8"POP /v X 0 0 P�2L/V 42OAKX2 42 "OAK2 I I�iIi 1111 I 1 ` 2n 0 X / + W W 24"Do W W W W W W W / WL4 X / + � 18"OAK i 1 0 \ v v p +� 18" AO K ` 1 �/ 8 AK ,l, y F70P W nI�OP 2" v Z4r OAF5X4 ` � ,.may {V • } (� Y > � W W W W W 2 �O \\/ - i �R' ` F � - OP \ I \ TURF \ I \ 0.12AC l I DYNAMIC INVESTMENT \ \ I CAPITAL ENTERPRISES 4\ I ZONED: C-1 I ^ I - \ I USE: OFFICE BUILDING 4 \ I ( a EXISTING - TURF I I II / IF BENT \ I 0.03AC 5i9Ni 74 58956 / T DB 440 P - (� I o �;5a9�6 ti/ \ ��SMH / I / NAGE SEMEN_ ti/ / .I 6"PRDS / 1j D - a4... \� ��SMH IF EX. _ -� � 5 IF 5 ` / � + 10 CFI�tY � _ � 7 / / � 4 " � POP \ 5"0 K _- - a 4 \ I 5"0 k 6" I qK + I 9 6" 0 O;oA t\ J2nM 8"MPL \ / I I I I 8"MPL X I 24"PINE I I g" HR� X I 24"PINE \ x I lb F, 211 OR 18"OA X I 18"P( 2n OP 18"8AF I / 8" L \ 1 \ 5 I + + I 18"OAM / I \ 1 5 I + �j n J V ��� / \W W w V QCO / 1 "PINE I / 36" OAKX2 " 8POP \� OR +� P + W / 36" OAKX2 \ / / W W W W J✓ W W W W� �W� � WTQIAIG W 0"CHRY �aYC W W J (DEWED) W b - 1 10"�PL J AV /W W j W W O\ PO III h �90 \ �6G/� W W p" L 1 "(�AK WlZ7 *EW W !�O 1, 4"POP PRE- EVE OpMENT W W W NIW Y Wog W `O �ba�r PRE-DEV -POST-DEVELOPMENT l b t' \ Runoff Hydrograph: TR-55 Tabular Hydrograph Method --- I I TC PATH 8.0 MIN Runoff Hydrog ar ph: TR-55 Tabular Hydrograph Method, - -- --- W WSW Input Data: I O �� Input Data: I Rainfall Distribution Type: Type II I I /Y + / `. \a Rainfall Distribution Type: Type II I I W Rainfall Depth: 5.57 in ` I I' Rainfall Depth: 5.57 in Base Flow: 0.000 cfs Base Flow: 0.000 cfs la/P Interpolation: On I UP la/P Interpolation: On \ Subarea Downstream Area CN Tic Tt / I I 'o Subarea Downstream Area CN Tic Tt / Reservoir Routing: Stl rage Indication Method lame Subareas (acre) (min) (min) I I I Name Subareas (acre) (min) (min) DA-PRE 0.31 71 8.00 8.00 I DA-POST 0.72 92 6.00 6.00 Input Files: Computed Results: / Computed Results: St low-S{drograpn Curve: Peak Discharge (Qp): 1.229 cfs Time to Peak: 12.10 hire (Runoff Volume: 0.04 acre-ft I I Sul age orage urve. Stage -Discharge Curve: Peak Discharge (Qp): 5.280 cfs Time to Peak: 12.10 hire Results: Runoff Volume: 0.17 acre-ft Inflow Peak Flow: I / ' Inflow Peak Time: / Routed Peak Flow: Routed Peak Time: I I Maximum Storage: Maximum Elevation: I1AFFIC \ OX�A I� 1 = av I w > - O 'd UV REV-IOYR-POST.hyd DIET PIPES.cap DET PIPES.stg 8 cfs 0 12. hr 0. 0.09 cfs 18.50 hr SCALE:=20' 0.2058 -feet 598.95 ft BENCHMARK TRAFFIC BOX ELEVATION=614.7y 20 40 0 U o m N w an ~ N ^ a O z IZ5 J 'm En O<o LO J<> �<W Q0) ~0 m �1 �4 O U ¢ -i o 0= - =I p� ON wU � W _j J ZO O_ >(n ^ N o x WZ IT CE Ir o ¢ w N wN m w na �> z o Q Q p J a A (-)z> o =WW OaU)an 0 n Er U z O d 0 w a O z O w 2 w 2 in 2 2 o w � n U U w z z a U O N O N o aN N � O N N M 0\0 iV Z N h DESIGNED BY:I JLF SMP DRAWN BY: I JLFNVN (CHECKED BY: I JLT Z,TH OF vr+P Jimmy L. Taggart Lic. No. 22841 W4 A��s'SIONAL g � U z J z Q J Q 0 Z IZ z >- > J f U z o W LL J < U Q/ 0 l 0 w� a_ 00 Er O O LL Q w z_ C DATE: OCTOBER 25 2019 SCALE: 1"=20' JOB: GTH FILE: 19.0125 SHEET: 9 OF 9 I Q\rmid"ProjecN\CMI Pmjenlsk'o16\190125\ENGINEERINGWAlml 6.0125 Gaor,e nHydraulicVS&P20dx9 STORM1 PROFILE VERTICAL PROFILE SCALE: 1"=10' 2 HORIZONTAL PROFILE SCALE: 1"=30' O 1 620 620 �z 615 o 0 615 w a 610 ~ ~ 610 w 605 605 TO USE VARIABLE DEPTH CLEAN FILL BETWEEN PAVEMENT AGGREGATE AND TOP OP OF STONE: 60. OTIE 600 12" STONE 600NCASEMENT _ C R .45 595 PP.49 — BOTTOM 590 590 in 585 585 o — 580 - w m 580 LLp o 575 vn w = = n 575 - LL 570 rn ,t N 570 N 0) M p 565 li a 565 560 - ~ --- -- - 560 9+75 10+00 11+00 0 /^\ 00 PLAN VIEW ---- , \ SKETCH NOT TO P 1 / SCALE o / i z (q� r p m � Fri W Om ¢$ FW �� T J O(Wj wv0 Ups dZ �vU NULL U 1 CD U F4- � oa � c) con C) Cw7 SHEET: C 1 OF 02 cc Oro Ow (Be �y Lu ; ir Er T VERTICAL PROFILE SCALE: 1"=10' PLAN VIEW HORIZONTAL PROFILE SCALE: 1"=30' STORM 2 PROFILE NOT TO SKETCSCALE STORM 3 PROFILE 4 2 3 620 620 620 620 620 � I " � rn / 615 J 615 615 6615 cn 0 610 p 610 610 610 605 605 6 605 605 6.85'-15"H 600 600 600 600 595 595 595 595 590 tr 590 590 590 � - a 585 M 585 585 Nm 585 o 0 LL ^ N 580 580 580 a N o 580 M M N m 575--a 575 575 575 - N 570 - -- - 570 570 1 ~ - N 570 9+75 10+00 9 75 10+00 I- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — /� PLAN VIEW ®� SKETCH NOT TO I SCALE ) 4' 9' I U� a 2 co N O� aN �I 35 -b ZN FW (7 Q w � � F-� wO� 0 O O z� CW7 SHEET: C2 OF 02 LU mm 4 Isolator Row To Top:: 603.54 15" Invert (from DI-3B): 598.62 24" Invert (to Isolator Chamber): 15" Invert: 598.40 15" Invert: 598.40 \\� 24" Sump Bottom: 594.6Z DI-3B L=8' Top = 603.8 15" INV = 598.67 Outlet Structure (see edits next I DI-3C ' L=6' TOP = 602.5 24" INVERT = 596.62 24" Sump required = 594.62 OUTLET STRUCTURE DETAIL STD. MANHOLE LID NOT TO SCALE FOR ACCESS 5.0' STD. MANHOLE STEPS _-----==5.0• 5' X 5INTERNAL DIMENSIONS OF OUTLET STRUCTURE �OUTLET JUNCTION BOX 9.0'H X 5.0'W 599.10 I II II I -6BirV III I I II II II � I 1 � -•II ------------- 4B LF OF 18" H OUTLET BARREL 9-fi:BM INV. IN=696,BP INV. OUT694,98 18" HP PIPE 22.49 LF OF Outlet Barrel @ 0.54 % INV IN: 595.70 INV OUT: 595.59 Lv O G L ;,_.1 ENAV 3" 0 ORIFICE ® i9%1B- 595.70 3.4'H INTERNAL WEIR PLATE 4.8' x 5.0' W ` .598.94 FOR OUTLEr FLOW CONTROL. INV 0 59&BB 599.10 _ 10 YEAR WSE 499M 15" INFLOW HOPE PIPE FROM DETENTION CHAMBERS 597.20 1 YEAR WSE-599-.0" 15" INFLOW @ 596.58 6" ADS N-12 DUAL WALL PERFORATED HDPE UNDERDRAIN @ 595.70 INVERT No detention sump required in outlet structure Move Outlet Structure as shown. 15" Pipe can enter into Outlet box without a bend in the pipe