HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201800040 Correspondence 2020-12-23SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C.
Design Focused Engineering
December 22, 2020
Mariah Gleason
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
RE: Response Letter #2 for SDP201800040 Hunters Way — Major Site Plan Amendment
Dear Mariah,
Thank you for your review of the major site plan amendment for Hunters Way. This letter contains
responses to County comments dated August 20, 2020. Our responses are as follows:
1. [32.5.2(a)] Zoning notes. List the special exceptions and conditions associated with this site plan
were approved on May 6, 2020 by the Board of Supervisors. Please see the signed resolution
attached. Rev. 4: Comment not fully satisfied. There appear to be minor clerical errors
within the Special Exception Conditions. Review and revise accordingly.
RESPONSE: Thank you for this comment, the minor clerical errors have been corrected.
2. [32.5.2(b), 4.12.6] Parking schedule. The site plan currently shows 46 parking provided, not 45.
More importantly, the parking schedule calculation for the retail building space was not found to
align with the County Zoning Ordinance. Under the parking regulations, retail uses not otherwise
identified are required to provide the following:
Retail use not otherwise identified: one space per each 100 square feet of retail sales area
for the first 5,000 square feet and one space per each 200 square feet of retail sales area
above 5,000 square feet. For purposes of this paragraph, "retail sales area" shall be
deemed to be: (1) 80 percent of the gross floor area; or (2) at the request of the applicant,
the actual retail sales floor area as shown on floor plans submitted by the applicant
delineating the actual retail sales area, which plans shall be binding as to the maximum
retail sales area used. (Added 2-5-03)
Based on this code section, the retail sales area — being less than 5,000 sf— would need to provide
parking spaces at a ratio of one space per 100sf of retail sales area. This would result in a total of
42 spaces for the retail building (5,200 sf * 80% = 4,160 retail sales area, 4,160 sf / 100 sf = 42
spaces).
I've followed up with Zoning staff and based on the intended use of this retail building as a
hardware store, staff have indicated that the proposal could instead calculate parking for this use
based on the parking ratio requirement for Furniture store and other large sized retail items such
as appliances, carpeting, office equipment or specific building materials. This scheduled use has
been used previously by the County to evaluate parking for hardware stores. Under this
requirement, the hardware store would need to provide parking at a ratio of one space per 400
square feet of retail sales area, or 11 spaces (4,200 sf / 400 sf). Unfortunately, this lower parking
requirement means that the current development proposal is overparked by around 64% (18
912 E. High St. Charlottesville, VA 22902 1434.227.5140 1 shimp-engineering.com
spaces). Revise the site design so the number of parking spaces does not exceed 20% of the
required parking, in accordance with Sec. 4.12.4(a). (Note: One option to recapture parking, if
desired, may be to include the sixth bay of the automobile service station in the parking
calculation for that use.)
Rev. 4: Comment not fully satisfied. Change the Drive-Thru Coffee Shop ratio to state
"...Per 200 SF of Gross Floor Area" to align with the over-the-counter sales parking
schedule use.
RESPONSE: The drive-thru coffee shop ratio has been revised to state "per 200 SF of gross floor
area" instead of "sales area" as was previously shown on the July 10, submittal.
3. [32.5.2(k)] Proposed sewer and drainage facilities.
a. A WPO plan/amendment must be approved before site plan amendment is approved
RESPONSE: Comment received. A WPO plan will be resubmitted.
b. Proposed easements shown on the site plan will need to reference a recorded deed book
and page number for these easements.
RESPONSE: Comment received. Once design comments for the site plan and WPO are
addressed, an easement plat will be provided.
Rev 4: Comments remain. Please submit the easement application when ready.
4. [32.7.9] Landscape plans.
a. [New] On Sheet C5, the quantities of the Rhododendron and Compact Glossy Abelia
plantings listed in the Landscape Schedule table did not align with the plan map.
Revise and adjust required calculations as necessary.
RESPONSE: Thank you for bringing this to our attention. The quantities have been
updated accordingly.
b. [New] On Sheet C5, there appears to be four (4) trees between the drive-thru lane
and proposed building and one (1) tree across from the drive-thru window that are
not identified in the Landscaping Schedule. Incorporate these plantings into the
Landscaping Schedule and adjust required calculations as necessary.
RESPONSE: Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We have identified this tree as
a Redbud. Please note that there are now five Redbud trees between the drive-thru lane
and proposed building as well as one Redbud tree across the drive-thru window.
c. [New] On Sheet C6, the quantities of the male Pin Oak, Eastern Redbud,
Rhododendron, and Compact Glossy Abelia plantings listed in the Landscape
Schedule table did not align with the plan map. Revise and adjust required
calculations as necessary.
RESPONSE: Thank you for bringing this to our attention. The table on C6 has been
updated, as well as the landscaping notes, to reflect the correct quantities and canopy
calculations.
[32.5.2(n)] Paving material. Indicate the surfacing material for areas around the proposed
building and parking islands.
Rev. 4: Comment not fully satisfied. Thank you for providing the paving material, however,
it appears there is no entry to the coffee shop's walk-up window based on where the
concrete sidewalk ends and the illustrated design of the outdoor seating. The current design
seems to force patrons of the walk-up window to go through the planted, mulched area.
Review and revise accordingly. Also, identify a paving material for the walk-up window and
outdoor seating area.
912 E. High St. Charlottesville, VA 22902 1434.227.5140 1 shimp-engineering.com
RESPONSE: Comment received. We have revised this area to include concrete walkways (3' and
5') to accommodate access to the walk-up window.
6. [32.5.2(n)] Signs. Remove all depictions and notes regarding signs (except stop signs and parking
signs) or include a note that makes it clear that these signs are not approved by this site plan
amendment and will require a separate application and approval. Rev 4: Comment not fully
satisfied. Include "Advertisement Signs" in the Sign Note on Sheet C3.
RESPONSE: Comment acknowledged. "Advertisement Signs" are now included in this note.
7. [32.5.1(c), 32.5.2(n), 4.12.16(e), 32.5.2(s)] Labels.
a. On Sheet C4, connect the arrow for the 'blew SWM Facility Easement" label with the
depicted improvement. Rev 4: Please also connect the leader line for the "New SWM
Facility Easement" label located near the Rt 250/Hunter's Way intersection. This
label is currently pointing to patterned critical slope areas.
RESPONSE: Thank you for bringing this to our attention. This leader has been adjusted.
8. [Comment] On the Cover Sheet, revise the note under the Lighting heading to refer to Sheet
C7 for the Lighting Schedule, instead of Sheet C6.
RESPONSE: Comment acknowledged. The note has been revised.
If you have any questions or concerns about these revisions, please feel free to contact me at
Kelsa@shimp-en ine eering com or by phone at 434-227-5140.
Regards,
Kelsey Schlein
Shimp Engineering, P.C.
912 E. High St. Charlottesville, VA 22902 1434.227.5140 1 shimp-engineering.com