HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA202000011 Correspondence 2021-01-04 (2)ZMA 2620-0 111 PREMIER CIRCLE
LETTER OF RESPONSE TO COUNTY STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS IN 12.15.20 PC STAFF REPORT
ORIGINAL SUBMISSION 9.21.20, RESUBMISSION 11.20.2020, THIRD SUBMISSION 01.04.2021
coment response loration of change m
Zoning Map Amendment: Staff recommends approval
with the following changes prior to the Board of
Supervisors:
1
Transportation concerns identified in the additional
See Premier Circle Preliminary Pavement Investigation
Premier Circle Preliminary Pavement Investigation,
information submitted by the applicant be addressed.
dated 01.04.2031 for analysis of current road conditions.
attachmeM to application submitted 01.04.2021. See
Project Narrative for further information regarding traffic
and road analysis and concerns regarding Premier Circle.
2
The Code of Development should be revised to include an
See table C in the Code of Development, "playground"
Table C and Table D in the Code of Development
amenity/playground for children.
has been added to the list of possible amenity spaces in
resubmitted 01.04.2021.
both blocks 1 and 2. See table D in the Code of
Development, recreational facilities will comply with 4.16
unless the planning director approves a substitution at
site plan. This will allow for playground, or, if appropriate
for the development, a substitution such as a community
garden.
3
Revise the notation on the application plan and in the
This note has been revised in the Code of Development
Section VII I of the Code of Development. Sheets 4 and 5
Code of Development that the bench and shelter for the
and the Application Plan as suggested.
of the Application Plan.
bus stop will be installed upon demand of the County.
4
The Code of Development should be revised to include a
See table B in the Code of Development, a maximum
Table B of the Code of Development.
maximum square footage of non-residential uses.
gross square footage of non-residential uses has been
added. The separate and specific identification of
maximum building footprint by use has been eliminated
because all uses except for retail had the same maximum
square footage. We have simplified this by only including
an overall maximum building footprint with a note that
identifies the variation for retail spaces.
Additional Change per Planning Commission and Board of
Supervisor Concerns off-the-record:
1
The possibility of residential uses in Block 1 raises a
See to bit A and B in the Code of Development, residential
Ta bles A and B in the Code of Development.
concern over loss of commercial / light industrial space in
uses are not permitted in Black 1.
this area.