HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP202000061 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2021-01-12Phone 434-296-5832
� OF
J� o
0
�GI1JlP4i
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, VA, 22902
Memorandum
To:
Daniel Hyer, PE
From:
Paty Satemye, Senior Planner
Division:
Planning
Date:
October 22, 2020
Rev. 1: January 12, 2021
Subiect:
SDP202000061 Airport Road Sheetz — Final Site Plan
Fax 434-972-4126
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the following
comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time.
Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded by
the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.]
Comments to be addressed with the Final Site Plan submission:
2. A site plan meeting all the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code.
FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed.
Rev. 1: Comment not vet fully addressed.
3. [32.5.2(a)] General information. Revise the following:
i) This site plan is based upon a boundary line adjustment. Therefore, address the following:
a. A boundary line adjustment plat must be submitted (separate application, fee and submission) and approved
prior to the approval of the final site plan.
FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment.
Rev. 1: Comment not vet addressed. Submit a boundary line adjustment plat (separate application & fee) for
review and approved prior to the approval of the final site Plan.
6. 132.5.20), (k) & (1)]] Existing sewer and drainage facilities; Private & public easements; Existing and proposed
utilities. Address the following:
b) See engineering comments in reference to required storm drainage easements and modification that will be
required.
FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. See engineering comments in reference to required storm drainage.
Rev. 1: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment.
e) An easement plat must be submitted (separate application, fee and submission) and approved prior to the approval
of the final site plan.
FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment.
Rev. 1: Comment not vet addressed. Address the comment.
f) Include the abandonment of any easement in the proposed easement plat.
FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment.
Rev. 1: Comment not vet addressed. Address the comment.
g) A proposed gas line easement is shown. An easement plat will be required. Work with gas provider to establish
this easement.
FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment.
h)
labels to say "New" instead of "Proposed.
7. 132.5.2(m) & 32.5.2.(i)] Ingress and egress; Streets, easements and travehvays. Address the following:
f) Rev. 1 [New Commentl: Revise the labels in the site plan, for all "Proposed easements", to include the Deed
Book and Page number for all newly recorded easement plats Prior to final site Plan approval. Also, revise the
labels to say "New" instead of"Proposed.
[32.5.2(n)] Existing and proposed improvements. Address the following:
b) Revise the plan to include a detail for the screening fence.
FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. A screening fence is no longer specified as being on top of the
retaining wall. If this fence to be included, then include a detail for the screening fence in the site plan.
Rev. 1: Comment not vet addressed. Address this comment. Comment response letter states that this will be
addressed after ARB approval.
d) Revise the plan to include a detail for the dumpster enclosure.
FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. Address the following:
1) Revise the provided detail to include the height of the walls.
Rev. 1: Comment not yet addressed. Address this comment. Comment response letter states that this
will be addressed after ARB approval. This is usually shown with an elevation or section of the dumpster
enclosure.
2) Ensure that all portions of the wall and gates have a minimum height of 6; (32.7.9.7(e)). The smaller of
the two gates is labeled to have a height of 5'-2".
Rev. 1: Comment not vet addressed. Address this comment. Comment response letter states that this
will be addressed after ARB approval.
3) Ensure that the dumpster pad meets the minimum requirements. The concrete dumpster pad must be at
least eight feet beyond the front of the dumpster, and therefore in front of the gate.
Rev. 1: Comment not vet addressed. Address this comment. Comment response letter states that this
will be addressed after ARB approval. Please note, the dumpster "Pad" is concrete Pavement under and
in front of the dumpster enclosure and should not impact ARB review.
g) Show all streettaccessway signage on the plan, ensure it is shown on the layout and landscaping sheets, and ensure
there are no conflicts with landscaping.
FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. Please get any clarification on required signs from engineering. In
reference to this comment, show all existing and proposed signs in the Landscape Plan sheet and ensure that there
are not conflicts between the signage and the landscaping.
Rev. 1: Comment not yet addressed. Address comment. Comment response letter said this would be addressed
after ARB approval. Show all streettaccessway signage on the plan, ensure it is shown on the layout and
landscaping sheets, and ensure there are no conflicts with landscaping.
h) Rev. 1 [New Commentl: Please note that Planning and ARB review these items for different criteria. Therefore,
waiting until ARB approves the items above may lengthen the review timeframe of the Project because additional
comments may be required by Planning.
9. 132.5.2.(e), 32.5.2.(p) & 32.6.2(j)] Landscape plan. A landscape plan is required in the final site plan that complies
with section 32.7.9. A landscape plan was submitted but requires additional information for the final site plan. Such
information should include, but is not limited to, the following:
g) Include in the site plan a filled out, signed and dated conservation checklist.
FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. Ensure that the owner of the site also signs the Conservation Checklist.
Rev. 1: Comment not vet fully addressed. Once the ownership has transferred ensure that the owner of the site
also signs the Conservation Checklist in the appropriate location.
h) Include in the existing conditions, grading and landscape sheets tree protection fencing around all existing trees
that are to remain and include tree protection fencing details in the site plan.
FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. Ensure that on all three sheets (existing conditions, grading &
landscaping) that the:
1) That the Tree Protection Fence line work is actually shown. It is shown in the Landscape Plan, but it does not
appear to be shown in the Grading and Drainage Sheet or the Site Plan Sheet. Only the limits of clearing and
grading appears to be shown in those two sheets.
Rev. 1: Comment not vet addressed. Address the comment.
10. 132.5.2(n) & 32.6.2(k)] Outdoor lighting. In reference to the photometric plan address the following:
b) Revise the Luminaire Schedule to have LLF value for all fixtures and update the table accordingly.
FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. LLF must be 1.0. Revise the chart and calculations for an LLF of 1.0
on all luminaries/fixtures.
Rev. 1: Comment not vet addressed. LLF must be 1.0. Chart shows LLFs of between 0.525 and 1.04. Only one
fixture is shown to have an LLF of 1.0. Revise the chart to ensure all LLFs area 1.0 and that all other values
shown are revised accordingly.
c) Revise the Luminaire Schedule to have values for the total lamp lumens.
FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Revise the charts to contain Total Lamp Lumens and ensure that the column
is labeled accordingly. Although the values may be shown in the chart, not chart column is labeled accordingly.
Rev. 1: Comment not vet addressed. Address the comment.
d) Ensure that the all product manufacturer cutsheets are provided in the site plan and include pictures or details that
allow determination that they are "full cut off'.
FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. Address the following:
1) Provide manufacturer cutsheets, that include pictures, for fixture "B" (BKLT CH — LED-e69-FL-BZP-12)
lighting fixture if it is to be included in the site plan. Otherwise remove it from the photometric plan and the
Luminaire Schedule.
Rev. 1: Comment not vet addressed. Address the comment.
2) Revise the light fixtures so that none can be tilted. Lights that tilt are not considered full cut off. Therefore
"F" (QSQ-AAXX- w/PGM-1 + OSQ-A-NM-I5D-B-57K-UL-XX) does not meet the full cut off requirement
and must be revised.
Rev. 1: Comment not vet addressed. In the "Luminaire Location Summary" it specifies that Luminaires "A:
and " F" will have atilt. Lights that tilt are not considered full cutoff and therefore do not meet the full cut
off requirement and must be revised. Revise the light fixtures so that none can be tilted.
3) Clarify how light fixture "F" is mounted and how it is at almost ground level when all the other OSQ series
are mounted on a pole.
Rev. 1: Comment not vet addressed. Address the comment.
e) FINAL: [NEW COMMENT] Revise the Symbols in the Luminaire Schedule to be the same color, darkness and
shape as those shown in the Photometric Plan. It is hard to differentiate the colors from each other in the schedule
and the colors in the schedule do not appear to match those in the plan. Also, at least one symbols not match
between the two and other do not appear to match because of scale, color and darkness.
Rev. 1: Comment not yet addressed. The symbols in the table are still much lighter than the ones in the layout.
Also, it is important to note that once printed black and white on the site plan approval set (once it is ready for
approval), and then scanned to be uploaded to out file storage system, it is likely that they will be hard to read and
may not be visible at all. Increase the darkness of the symbols in the Luminaire Schedule.
h) Rev. 1 [NEW COMMENTI: In the comment response letter ensure where on each sheet the comments have been
addressed. Multiple responses in the comment response letter for the comments above state. "Please refer to
revised photometric plan." However, it does not appear that some of them have been addressed.
13. [Comment] See the SRC comments from most of the reviewers attached. All SRC reviewer comments must be
sufficiently address prior to final site plan approval.
FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. See the comments from most of the reviewers attached. ARB comments are
still pending (see below). All reviewer comments must be sufficiently address prior to final site plan approval.
Rev. 1: Comment not vet fullv addressed. Fire Rescue. Inspections and RWSA have no obiections. See attached
comments from Engineering. VDOT. and ACSA. All reviewer comments must be sufficiently address prior to final
site plan approval.
Please contact Paty Saternye in the Planning Division by using psaternye(rDalbemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext
3250 for further information.
Review Comments for SDP202000061 Final Site Development Plan
Project Name I AIRPORT ROAD SHEETZ - FINAL - DIGITAL
Date Completed: Monday, December 21, 2020 DepartmenUDivisionlAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: David James
CDD Engineering Requested Changes
1. The VSMP plan will need approval prior to FSP approval. (Rev-1) Comment still valid.
2. Record plat for SWIM facility easements, Access, Temporary Construction, Forest/Open Space. Drainage easements needed
prior to FSP approval. (Rev.1) SWIM facility easements will need to be recorded along with the deed prior to FSP approval.
3.Please remove the E&SC, SWIM, and drainage design sheets from the FSP - Sheets C2.0 thru C2.8. C7.0 thru C7.6. (Rev1)
Addressed.
4. C3.1 — Show the turn and taper lane lengths and widths labeled. Taper at 12:1 with 12' lane widths. (Rev1)Acknow1edged.
5. Sheet C4.1: Show a stone base thickness of 6" for C&G (21-A or better), 4' shown. (Rev.1)Addressed.
6. Provide retaining wall design for walls over 4' high. (Rev. 1) Acknowledged.
7. Walls over 3' will need separate building permit. (Rev. 1) Acknowledged.
8. Walls over 30" will need safety railing. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
9. Show & label SWIM facility & access easements. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
Pape: 10 County of Albemarle Printed Cn: 19I23f2020
C� OF ALBF
COUNTY OFALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
Phone (434) 296-5832
December 8, 2020
Valerie Long, Esquire
Williams Mullen
321 E. Main Street, Suite 400
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Fax (434) 972-4126
RE: ARB-2020-108: Airport Road Sheetz — Final - Digital (TMP: 03200-00-00-03800)
Dear Ms. Long,
The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board reviewed the above noted item at its meeting on
Monday, December 7, 2020. The Board unanimously approved the request, pending staff
administrative approval of the following conditions:
1. Revise the design of the store building to establish more coordinated material transitions,
less of a utilitarian appearance on the Airport Road elevation, and an entrance tower with a
prominent form. Address prominence and hierarchy in the tower form. Revisions must be
reviewed by the ARB in a future work session prior to final approval.
2. Revise the proposed glass so that the VLT does not drop below 40%.
3. Add the standard window glass note to the architectural drawings.
4. Identify all other site elements associated with the car wash (i.e., vending machines,
vacuums, air pumps, etc.) on the site plan.
5. Relocate or revise the color of the ice machine, and relocate the store equipment behind the
fence.
6. Add the standard mechanical equipment note verbatim to the site and architectural plans.
7. Show tree protection fencing on the grading plan.
8. Revise the lighting plan to use LLFs of at least 1.0. Ensure that footcandle values do not
exceed 30 fc beneath the canopy and 20 fc everywhere else on site.
9. If landscaping is will be shown on multiple sheets of the site plan set, then revise the
plan to show the proposed landscaping consistently throughout.
10. Revise the landscape plan to eliminate the utility conflict near the north end of the
parking area along Rt. 29 without reducing the quantity of trees.
11. Sign applications are required for all proposed signs.
12. The preferred wall sign type is channel letters. Cabinet style signs may be used for
freestanding signs; all cabinet type signs must have opaque backgrounds.
13. Reduce the number of colors used in the signs to a maximum of three (including white).
Please provide:
1. One full set of revised drawings addressing each of these conditions. Include updated ARB
revision dates on each drawing.
2. A memo including detailed responses indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If
changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo
also. Highlighting the changes in the drawing with "clouding" or by other means will facilitate
review and approval.
3. The attached "Revised Application Submittal" form. This form must be returned with your
revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution.
Revisions may be submitted online through the County's digital submission portal. When staffs
review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of
Appropriateness may be issued.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
1T:
Khris Taggart
Planner
ktaggart@albemarle.org
cc: Airport Plaza, LLC
5029 Stoney Point Road
Barboursville, VA 22923
File
Review Comments for SDP202000061 Final Site Developi
Project Name: AIRPORT ROAD SHEETZ - FINAL - DIGITAL
Date Completed: Monday, December 21, 2020 Department/Division/Agency: Review Sti
Reviewer: Richard Nelson ACSA Requested
Below are comments for SDP2020-61 Airport Road Sheetz Final Site Plan:
1) Submit 3 copies of the plan set to ACSA for review and approval.
2) Provide fixture counts for the domestic meter. A 2" water meter seems large.
3) RWSA approval will be required.
4) Service connections for larger meters should match our typical construction standards (attached).
FIT, id:i�I_f
VARIES
�.i�r�.cnu�•�inu�runua.
TO METER BOX (SEE FIG.
THRU W-7E).
COPPER
W-6
HREADED FOR
:SSION FITTING
NOTES:
• GATE VALVE WILL BE 4" UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE ACSA.
• SERVICE LINE TO CONNECT AT MAIN WITH X"A" TEE.
• REFER TO FIG. W-3 FOR THRUST BLOCK DETAILS ON TEE.
• REFER TO FIG. W-5 FOR THRUST BLOCK DETAILS AND DEPTH OF COVER ON GATE VALVE.
• NO CONCRETE SHOULD BE POURED ON ANY PART OF THE RESTRAINED JOINT. USE PLASTIC SHEETING AS
PROTECTION FOR BOLTS.
• USE 2500 P.S.I. CONCRETE.
LARGE METER SERVICE LINE
N TS
FIG. W-6C
TD-12
10
METER SIZE
DIMENSION
DIMENSION
DIMENSION
A
B
C
1 1/2'
3'1'
5'0'
3'8'
2'
3'1'
5'0'
3'8'
3'
5' MIN.
10' MIN.
4'
5' MIN.
12' MIN.
GREATER
THAN 4'
PROPOSALS WILL BE SUBMITTED.
M.
DOOR HINGES
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
LIFT HANDLE
L- - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
TYPICAL METER VAULT
N.T.S.
FIG. W-7A
SIDE VIEW
.75' DIAMETER DRILLED
IOLE FOR TOUCH READ
INITS.
TOP VIEW
3" DIAMETER FLAT
BEARING SURFACE
UNDERNEATH
24' X 36'
ALUMINUM ACCESS
HATCH
TD-14
44"
MIN.
6" MIN. 17.5" 6" MIN.
a
TD-16
(Z)
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Stephen C. Brich, P.E. 1401 East Broad Street
Commissioner Richmond, Virginia 23219
December 2, 2020
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Attn: Patricia Saternye
Re: Airport Road Sheetz — Final Site Plan
SDP-2020-00061
Review #2
Dear Ms. Saternye:
(804) 786-2701
Fax: (804) 786,2940
The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Line+Grade Civil Engineering,
dated November 23, 2020, and offers the following comments:
1. Please show and label "mill and overlay" areas to adjacent travel lane in accordance with
WP-2. WP-2 mill and overlay will extent the full lane width and a minimum 2' past all
proposed work within the R/W.
If further information is desired, please contact Max Greene at 434-422-9894.
A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The
owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process.
Sincerely,
Adam J. Moore, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING