HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP202000049 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2021-01-15SDP202000049 - Mill Creek Industrial Lot 11— Final —Jan. 2021
Engineering comments (David lames):
1. Submit a VSMP application & plan if you haven't already. Disturbance over 10,000sf. (17-302)
Addressed.
2. It appears that the parcel boundary line appears different than what's shown in County GIS, and
will need to confirm with real estate if property line shown is accurate.
Addressed.
3. Show areas of off -site disturbance in an easement (i.e. entrance improvements). Signed letter of
permission from an offsite owner is sufficient, but only for the purposes of this review, or record
a plat.
Acknowledged. VDOT approval on entrance improvements in ROW & VDOT entrance permit
required.
4. Submit design plans & comps for walls over 4' high prior to FSP approval.
Acknowledged; required with building permit application.
5. Cover —
a. Sign & date seal.
b. The stated sheet layout of 1" = 30' do not appear to be accurate.
Addressed.
6. Sheet 3 —
a. Remove curb before CG-12 and show access apron.
b. Show safety railing for walls over 30" high.
Addressed.
7. Sheet 4 — Provide reverse slope bench and/or surface water diversion for the graded slopes. {18-
30.7.5)
Addressed.
8. Sheet 5 —
a. Show ground cover (not grass) for disturbed slopes over 3:1 grade.
b. Remove proposed trees and place trees outside of public drainage easements.
Addressed.
9. Sheet 8 — Storm STIR 4 to 2 the line is 12" dia. and will need an additional MH access (over 50'
length) [VDOT DM 9.3.6, table 9.3], or use a 15" dia.
Acknowledged; NA.
10. The VSMP plan will need to be approved prior to FSP approval. (Rev.1/2) Currently not
addressed.
11. Submit plat to record drainage & SWM facility & access easements prior to FSP approval.
(Rev. 1/2) Currently not addressed.
12. Sheet 3—The curb cut gaps are too wide (safety concern). Site plans require curb & gutter. A
solution would be to provide narrower (2') and multiple openings instead. (Rev.l) Addressed.
13. Sheet 5 - These three trees are not acceptable near SWM basin embankment. Consider placing
shrubs or small trees instead. (Rev.l) Addressed.
14. Sheet 8 - The profile (STR 8 — EX 1) show 4:1 side slopes and appear to be inaccurate; 3:1
measured. 3:1 is acceptable. (Rev.l) Addressed.
15. (Rev.1) Sheet 4, etc. - I'd like to see this ditch a bit more defined up to the emergency
spillway. Show ditch centerline and 451' contour or spot shot (Rev.2) Addressed.
Ci
EXISTING ACSA 9
1a"
DIP WATERLINE
NG DRIAINAGE EASEM T
/. 1341-141 & D.B. 1101-731I�
ROW A.
DSEE
M itIfg,)/ Imo,
16. (Rev.1) 5.,eet 5 -Remove large trees fr--
"`-'- `he other one is fine; just
need to move it down past the 452' (Rev.2) Addressed.
I'
15 _
F
/ I + P'�
17. (Rev.2) Sheet 8 was not revised/included with the latest revisions.