Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP202000049 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2021-02-02Phone 434-296-5832 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4579 Memorandum To: Scott Collins (cs o!L@collins-en ing eering com) From: Paty Satemye, Senior Planner Division: Planning Date: August17,2020 Rev. 1: November 5, 2020 Rev. 2: December 17, 2020 Rev. 3: February 2, 2021 Subject: SDP 202000049 Mill Creek Industrial Park — Lot I I — Final Site Development Plan Fax 434-9724126 The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.] Initial Site Plan Comments (from approval letter dated 3/16/16): 10. 132.5.20, k)] Verify that all lines and all necessary easements for proposed water, sewer and drainage facilities have been shown on the plan. Final: Comment not yet fully addressed. Address the following: d) If any easements are proposed with this site plan the easement plat and all required deeds must be recorded prior to the final site plan approval. Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. Submit a new application fee and plat for all proposed easements. The easement plat must be reviewed, approved, recorded and the deed book and page number ... Rev. 2: Comment not yet addressed. Submit the easement plat as specified in the Rev. 1 comment above.... Rev. 3: Comment not yet fully addressed. The easement plat has been submitted and is under review. Final Site Plan cannot be approved until the easement plat is approved and recorded and the deed book and page numbers for the recorded plat are added to the Final Site Plan. Additional comments for Final Site Plan: 27. [Comment] This site plan cannot be approved until all reviewers grant their approval. E911 and RWSA have no objection. See the attached comments from all of the other reviewers. Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed.... Rev. 2: Comment not yet fully addressed.... cannot be approved until all reviewers grant their approval. See the attached comments from all of the other reviewers. Staff has provided references to provisions of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle. The Code is kept up to date by the County Attorney's office. The Code may found on the County Attorney's website which may be found under "Departments and Services" at Albemarle.org. In accord with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code if the developer fails to submit a revised final site plan to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter the application shall be deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the developer. Please contact Paty Saternye in the Planning Division by using psatemye(Ralbemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext. 3250 for further information. Page 1 of 1 Patricia "Paty" Saternye From: Richard Nelson <rnelson@serviceauthority.org> Sent: Friday, January 8, 2021 5:34 PM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye Subject: RE: SDP202000049 Mill Creek Industrial Lot II - Final Site Plan review Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Paty, Below are comments for SDP202000049 Mill Creek Industrial Lot II - Final Site Plan: Add a note for contractor to reuse the existing corp stop rather than installing a new service and abandoning the existing service. Due to proposed geofabric separation from existing ACSA water main. ACSA would like the water main to be pot holed to confirm the horizontal separation from the fabric. The field location should be shown on the plan. Coordinate with ACSA to have a locator and inspector on site for this. See image below for reference. 78) I; OU462.49/ iS' GAS LINE EASEMENT (0.8. u2o-n4) � I l PROPOSED SEGMENTED RETAINING WALL WITH SAFETY RAILING (MAX. HT.=io') 2 test pits along this alignment to MITS OF C confirm location. 1 A on each side. V 1 EXISTING CATCH BASIN _ TOP= 475.08 1 jr INV OUT=473.o6 i y ROPOSED STONE LINED TRAPEZOIDAL f CHANNEL OUTFALL (2'WIDE AT 1 SDP202000049 - Mill Creek Industrial Lot 11— Final —Jan. 2021 Engineering comments (David lames): 1. Submit a VSMP application & plan if you haven't already. Disturbance over 10,000sf. (17-302) Addressed. 2. It appears that the parcel boundary line appears different than what's shown in County GIS, and will need to confirm with real estate if property line shown is accurate. Addressed. 3. Show areas of off -site disturbance in an easement (i.e. entrance improvements). Signed letter of permission from an offsite owner is sufficient, but only for the purposes of this review, or record a plat. Acknowledged. VDOT approval on entrance improvements in ROW & VDOT entrance permit required. 4. Submit design plans & comps for walls over 4' high prior to FSP approval. Acknowledged; required with building permit application. 5. Cover — a. Sign & date seal. b. The stated sheet layout of 1" = 30' do not appear to be accurate. Addressed. 6. Sheet 3 — a. Remove curb before CG-12 and show access apron. b. Show safety railing for walls over 30" high. Addressed. 7. Sheet 4 — Provide reverse slope bench and/or surface water diversion for the graded slopes. {18- 30.7.5) Addressed. 8. Sheet 5 — a. Show ground cover (not grass) for disturbed slopes over 3:1 grade. b. Remove proposed trees and place trees outside of public drainage easements. Addressed. 9. Sheet 8 — Storm STIR 4 to 2 the line is 12" dia. and will need an additional MH access (over 50' length) [VDOT DM 9.3.6, table 9.3], or use a 15" dia. Acknowledged; NA. 10. The VSMP plan will need to be approved prior to FSP approval. (Rev.1/2) Currently not addressed. 11. Submit plat to record drainage & SWM facility & access easements prior to FSP approval. (Rev. 1/2) Currently not addressed. 12. Sheet 3—The curb cut gaps are too wide (safety concern). Site plans require curb & gutter. A solution would be to provide narrower (2') and multiple openings instead. (Rev.l) Addressed. 13. Sheet 5 - These three trees are not acceptable near SWM basin embankment. Consider placing shrubs or small trees instead. (Rev.l) Addressed. 14. Sheet 8 - The profile (STR 8 — EX 1) show 4:1 side slopes and appear to be inaccurate; 3:1 measured. 3:1 is acceptable. (Rev.l) Addressed. 15. (Rev.1) Sheet 4, etc. - I'd like to see this ditch a bit more defined up to the emergency spillway. Show ditch centerline and 451' contour or spot shot (Rev.2) Addressed. Ci EXISTING ACSA 9 1a" DIP WATERLINE NG DRIAINAGE EASEM T /. 1341-141 & D.B. 1101-731I� ROW A. DSEE M itIfg,)/ Imo, 16. (Rev.1) 5.,eet 5 -Remove large trees fr-- "`-'- `he other one is fine; just need to move it down past the 452' (Rev.2) Addressed. I' 15 _ F / I + P'� 17. (Rev.2) Sheet 8 was not revised/included with the latest revisions.