Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA200700003 Review Comments 2007-03-30STAFF PERSON: William D. Fritz, AICP PUBLIC HEARING: April 10, 2007 VA 2007 — 003 Calvary Baptist Church -Sign Owner/Applicant: Calvary Baptist Church of Scottsville Tax Map/Parcel Number: 130 - 25R Zoning: RA, Rural Areas and EC, Entrance Corridor Overlay District Acreage: 5.0 Acres Location: This property is located on the southwest side of Scottsville Road (Route 20) west of and adjacent to the Scottsville Elementary School. Technical Request and Explanation: The applicant request relief from Section 4.15.8. The requested variance is to reduce the setback fora sign from 10 to 3 feet (a variance of 7 feet). (The sign is currently in place, but has not been cited for violation pending the outcome of this variance.) The sign consists of monument type sign. The sign text is "Calvary Baptist Church, Calvary is for everyone" the sign also has area for changeable text. The sign specifics are: Cabinet Length: 73 1/8" Cabinet Height: 48" Total Sign Length: 9' 4" Total Sign Height: 7' The sign meets the requirements for size and has been approved by the Architectural Review Board. The only reason this sign is before the Board of Zoning Appeals is for a reduction in setback from Route 20. Relevant History: April 20, 1983 — The Board of Supervisors approved SP 83-07 authorizing a church. June 20, 1983 — The site plan for the church is approved. May 25, 1984 — The subdivision plat creating the church parcel is approved. December 8, 1987 — The Board of Zoning Appeals approves a variance to increase the sign size from 4 to 27 square feet and to reduce setback from 150 feet (the former scenic highway setback) to 10 feet. 1994 — A site plan amendment for an expansion is submitted. Revisions are never received and the plan is not approved. 2000 - A site plan amendment for an expansion is submitted. Revisions are never received and the plan is not approved. VA -2007-003 Calvary Baptist Church - Sign April 10, 2007 Page 2 of 4 August 11, 2005 — Building permit issued for the construction of the sign currently under review for a variance. More information on the permit review and construction of the sign is contained below. November 2005 — The applicant is cited for a violation involving lighting. May 22, 2006 — A site plan amendment is submitted to address the zoning violation and other changes to the site. This plan is still under review. Property Description and Qualifying Conditions: The Zoning Ordinance in Section 34.2 establishes the review criteria for a variance. Staff will provide comment on the criteria for granting a modification. The ordinance states: When a property owner can show that his property was acquired in good faith and where, by reason of the exceptional narrowness, shallowness, size or shape of a specific piece of property at the time of the effective date of this ordinance, or where, by reason of exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary situation or condition of such piece of property, or of the use or development of property immediately adjacent thereto, the strict application of the terms of this ordinance would effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use of the property or where the board is satisfied, upon the evidence heard by it, that the granting of such variance will alleviate a clearly demonstrable hardship approaching confiscation, as distinguished from a special privilege or convenience sought by the applicant, provided that all variances shall be in harmony with the intended spirit and purpose of this ordinance. The across the frontage of the property the topography is dominated by a cut made for Route 250 and specifically the turn lane that serves both the church and Scottsville Elementary. To the north the hill becomes more dominant and the road narrows to only two lanes. The presence of the hill to the north does serve to limit visibility of the entrance to the church. This hill is on adjacent property not controlled by the church and therefore, cannot be regarded without permission of the abutting landowner and modification of the churches special use permit and site plan. Specifically the ordinance establishes the review criteria to address the above. No such variance shall be authorized by the board of zoning appeals unless it finds: (a) that the strict application of this ordinance would produce undue hardship; (b) that such hardship is not shared generally by other properties in the same zoning district and the same vicinity; and (c) that the authorization of such variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and that the character of the district will not be changed by the granting of the variance. Staff will analyze each provision of the ordinance and provide comment. The applicant's justification is also included. Staff comments are in italics. Hardship that the strict application of this ordinance would produce undue hardship The applicant has stated: VA -2007-003 Calvary Baptist Church - Sign April 10, 2007 Page 3 of 4 "If the church were required to move the sign it would cost upwards of $5,000 to $10,000 to do. We are a non profit organization and this would cause undue hardship on our church. Staff opinion is cost is a significant inconvenience but does not represent a hardship. Staff has attempted to recreate the circumstances that led to the construction of the sign closer to Route 20 than permitted. Based on conversations with the inspector involved it appears that the field marked sign location, which was the same as the location shown on the submitted building permit, and the constructed location differ. Staff can provide no further information on how the sign ultimately was constructed in its current location. Relocation of the sign would however, substantially reduce the visibility of the sign and this may be considered a hardship. This opinion is based on the topography of the church property and the adjacent property to the north. Reducing the setback allows the sign to be seen alerting south bound traffic as to the location of the entrance to the church. If the 10 foot setback were maintained the visibility of the sign would be reduced and may make identification of the church entrance difficult. The church itself is not visible to south bound traffic until well past the beginning of the turn lane. Uniqueness of Hardship that such hardship is not shared generally by other properties in the same zoning district and the same vicinity The applicant has stated: "The visual hardship that exists coupled with the sloping topography of the front portion of the property in relation to the adjoining properties elevation creates a unique condition and situation for the churches property" Staff opinion is the topography of the site is not generally shared by other properties. This property has a significant cut which was caused by the construction of the turn lane. This is not a common feature along Route 20. Impact on Adjacent Property and District that the authorization of such variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and that the character of the district will not be changed by the granting of the variance. The applicant has stated: "That there will be and has not been any detriment to adjacent property is clearly seen by the fact that there is still some 20 feet of right-of-way space before you get to the large drainage ditch at the front of the property plus the deceleration lane that runs the entire length of the property at the front. Plus the sign has been there for almost 2 yrs without any problems or any changes being made to the district." Staff opinion is that approval of this variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and does not change the character of the district. This opinion is based on the fact that the sign does not create confusion as to entrance locations, is not VA -2007-003 Calvary Baptist Church - Sign April 10, 2007 Page 4 of 4 near adjacent properties. Reduction of the setback does not generate a safety hazard to the traveling public. Summary and Staff Recommendation: Of the three criteria for granting a variance staff finds that it meets all three (3) criteria for approval and is able to recommend approval. A further provision for the granting of a variance is: No variance shall be authorized unless the board of zoning appeals finds that the condition or situation of the property concerned or the intended use of the property is not of so general or recurring a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation to be adopted as an amendment to the ordinance. Staff opinion is that the condition or situation of the property is not of so general a recurring nature as to make amendment of the ordinance practicable. Therefore, the Board may grant a variance if it finds that the criterion for a variance has been met. Staff recommends approval of this application subject to no conditions. Attachments A — Tax Map B- Diagram of Sign Location C - Photos • 121 122 123 • • 122 30-1 < 122-8 Attachment A i :OA \ \ / I c` 130-20 j I 1 '' tit , 122-7 1 , .,,,,,,,,,,,I. ,,,, , _ / 130-18 ,,,,,,„,,, ,,,,,,, i 130-19A 131-5 VINE'FUR , ,, s 1 70 i-vis 4 ,b. 130-19 I _ 130-4 __I / I / \ 118 1 17B N. i I 1 . 0 1A 20 _ ill, .. VA-2007-003 Calvary Baptist , ' 130-5A Church of S Samuel W. Spino V/ i k3n °° : th1 131-182325R 1 4 131-18 N 7C / ( WILLED CREE� ,:.. 17D / / �_ 24 , w 7F/ _ \ \ ! ,• "—I / 7H 71\ 17 I 25 r 1 V. 7M I � N v 511 Elk _ h ��� C� t 130 , agits .:, p P j 7T 21V `18 •�}, / ii,,,.L41,4140110:11EA r We- glife ,,,.., 1.91,13i 130-7Q ' ji --- - -1' \ •130 8/ 39 ? 1 -38E 130 7Y4 40- �<` / l `m / T%J1Ai3OA 130-15 / i ego-°�1 I "- `�' N 130-43 . \ � _ � ��� \ 42 �� �S,4, et /6� 1291\OA 1 / \ 130-1 \ Ir 't�j ()R . A \ RC. CASTLE CREEK , (- % i 135 136 137 Tax 0 800 Scalet'800 2,400 Albemarle County 13 U Ma p' Feet V5+fie Note This map is for display purposes only and shows parcels as of 12/31/2005. See Map Book Introdudion for additional details 7 i-i) r If ft, tot I C C) ti 1 4 oz irk}) pot \- aw o w•ss Jo frSvQv.'vJ ,Lii i I -v+J P + ;s j z, ic-ocxl.M 4cY o 0 �� U 4 D �o�, • j e /£ �Ci.s Ava v• ov.) ! P p V� ,[ r X 4•ar av71 .),1-t>,7ldiaJC) 0-4 vC;S )-o asiica `a'1ZI8 ,h0 6' I. I i g luauzgo y Attachment C • +of',- • r � �1 • n �t 1r ,tk jr • • y� r • Attachment C • yS i CA • .� ram" 1 of ,A.fin .' " ' r f<A) +vim its s C .cs e Attachment C .• • •• .•, _ • SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT 11111- _ . • AP 2 5 111: ';,`Y• • WHEN - FLASHING • • gz. • 1/44 A ;Al .t.--;"• • • 1,10 I . r . , • ''1111WIXA 111b. Attachment C - Lwisorimat— idow:rdrii -• 4144 go. 6 '1* V • ' • Alrget 111W17., 4 40111104,,.,' . _