HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB202100007 Staff Report 2021-03-02ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project #/Name
ARB-2021-007: Starbucks Initial Site Plan
Review Type
Initial Site Plan and Preliminary Review of Architecture
Parcel Identification
045B 1-05-OA-0 I 100
Location
2231 Seminole Trail
Zoned
Highway Commercial (HC), Airport Impact Area (AIA), Entrance Corridor (EC)
Owner/Applicant
Commercial Rentals LLC/Timmons Group (Craig Kotarski)
Magisterial District
Rio
Proposal
To demolish an existing office building to construct a 1,138 sq. ft. building to accommodate a drive-thru Starbucks in addition to
associated site improvements on approximately .70 acres.
Context
The subject property is comprised of an existing 2%-story office building that is set back approximately 143 feet from the road. A
landscaped lawn and a paved parking lot are located between the building and the Rt. 29 Entrance Corridor. This portion of Route
29 is largely characterized by commercial development with nearby developments including Walmart to the west, car dealerships
to the northwest, and a gas station to the north. Residential properties are directly adjacent to the east (Fig. 1).
Visibility
The proposed development will be readily visible from the Route 29 Entrance Corridor.
ARB Meeting Date
March 1, 2021
Staff Contact
Khris Taggart
PROJECT HISTORY
The ARB approved ARB-2003-56, a proposal for alterations to the fagade of the existing office building and landscaping changes to the site. A pre -application
conference was held to discuss the proposed site changes on November 16, 2020.
Figure 1: Pictometry Image showing project area along the Rt. 29 Entrance Corridor.
ANALYSIS
y highlight = means the guideline can't be reviewed at initial site plan stage, but recommendations can be provided for final
Yellow highlight = means the guideline can only be reviewed for location/configuration at the initial plan stage
Regular tent = means the guideline can be reviewed at initial plan stage, can be made a condition of initial plan approval, and can be the basis for denial
REF
I GUIDELINE
ISSUE
RECOMMENDATION
GENERAL GUIDELINES
Pa ose; ConWaftbilify with si ni cant historic sites; Commadbili with the character of the Entrance Corridor; Structure Design
1
The goal of the regulation of the design of
This portion of the Rt. 29 Entrance Corridor includes a
Revise the design to establish a
development within the designated Entrance
mixture of small- and large-scale commercial buildings of
base that is evident on the side
Corridors is to ensure that new development within
varying styles and forms that achieve compatibility largely
elevations.
the corridors reflects the traditional architecture of the
through the use of brick as a primary building material. The
area. Therefore, it is the purpose of ARB review and
proposed design is contemporary in nature and displays only
Provide samples for all materials
of these Guidelines, that proposed development
a basic connection to the historic architecture of the County.
and colors.
within the designated Entrance Corridors reflect
The connection is demonstrated in the commercial building
elements of design characteristic of the significant
form evident at the front of the building with storefront
historical landmarks, buildings, and structures of the
windows above a masonry base and below a metal canopy,
Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and to promote
and a sign band above. Also, the primary building materials,
orderly and attractive development within these
brick and wood, were used historically throughout the
corridors. Applicants should note that replication of
County. The brick is proposed in a stack bond, which is a
historic structures is neither required nor desired.
historic pattern but is less common, and in a medium shade of
gray (Velour Medium Gray). The color renderings suggest
2
Visitors to the significant historical sites in the
Charlottesville and Albemarle area experience these
that the brick walls will have a strong texture, but they also
sites as ensembles of buildings, land, and vegetation.
appear somewhat utilitarian. Establishing a base for the walls
In order to accomplish the integration of buildings,
that would be evident on the sides of the buildings would
land, and vegetation characteristic of these sites, the
reinforce the historic base -middle -top wall pattern and could
Guidelines require attention to four primary factors:
decrease the utilitarian appearance.
compatibility with significant historic sites in the
area; the character of the Entrance Corridor; site
development and layout; and landscaping.
3
New structures and substantial additions to existing
structures should respect the traditions of the
architecture of historically significant buildings in the
Charlottesville and Albemarle area. Photographs of
historic buildings in the area, as well as drawings of
architectural features, which provide important
examples of this tradition are contained in Appendix
A.
4
The examples contained in Appendix A should be
used as a guide for building design: the standard of
compatibility with the area's historic structures is not
intended to impose a rigid design solution for new
development. Replication of the design of the
important historic sites in the area is neither intended
nor desired. The Guideline's standard of compatibility
can be met through building scale, materials, and
forms which may be embodied in architecture which
is contemporary as well as traditional. The Guidelines
allow individuality in design to accommodate varying
tastes as well asspecial functional requirements.
5
It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to
establish a pattern of compatible architectural
characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in
order to achieve unity and coherence. Building
designs should demonstrate sensitivity to other nearby
structures within the Entrance Corridor. Where a
designated corridor is substantially developed, these
Guidelines require striking a careful balance between
harmonizing new development with the existing
character of the corridor and achieving compatibility
with the significant historic sites in the area.
9
Building forms and features, including roofs,
windows, doors, materials, colors and textures should
be compatible with the forms and features of the
significant historic buildings in the area, exemplified
by (but not limited to) the buildings described in
Appendix A [of the design guidelines]. The standard
of compatibility can be met through scale, materials,
and forms which may be embodied in architecture
which is contemporary as well as traditional. The
replication of important historic sites in Albemarle
County is not the objective of these guidelines.
13
Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from
A mural is shown on the south elevation. In the proposed
Revise the design of the north and
building design should be relieved using design detail
location, east of the bump -out, the mural would have some
south elevations to incorporate
or vegetation, or both.
visibility from the Rt. 29 EC. Proposed landscaping could
architectural detailing to relieve
help limit the visibility. Removal of the wooded area on the
blankness.
parcel to the south, if/when that site develops, would increase
visibility. While the design of the mural is currently
conceptual, the applicant would like to place a mural in the
location that is shown. Without the mural, this portion of the
south elevation would appear "blank" due to the lack of
architectural detailing. Although relieving "blankness" with a
mural might be acceptable for some existing buildings in
some locations, the intent of the guideline is for new
construction to incorporate architectural detailing to relieve
"blankness". The north elevation, which is also visible from
the EC, also lacks architectural detailing east of the drive-thru
window. Revising the elevations to reduce blankness on these
elevations would be appropriate.
10
Buildings should relate to their site and the
The building has a simple form like many of the buildings in
Revise the proposed design to
surrounding context of buildings.
the surrounding area. As viewed from the EC, human scale is
enhanced by the metal canopy/column/screen structure which
create a better sense of human
scale and coordination.
11
The overall design of buildings should have human
scale. Scale should be integral to the building and site
adds interest at the west end of the building, and by the
design.
outdoor seating area with benches on the EC -facing side.
However, the focus on human scale does not transition to the
12
Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor
should use forms, shapes, scale, and materials to
eastern end of the building where the architectural detail is
create a cohesive whole.
reduced. Defining the base of the building could balance out
the stucco band at the top of the wall and reinforce scale and a
coordinated whole.
14
Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural
A single building is proposed, so a connecting device is not
None.
connecting devices should be used to unify groups of
necessary.
buildings within a development.
15
Trademark buildings and related features should be
The canopy is proposed in the standard Starbucks dark green
None.
modified to meet the requirements of the Guidelines.
color, and the wood cladding sems to be part of Starbucks'
current materials palette but the overall building design does
not have a trademark feel.
16
Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be
The window glass note is present on the architectural
None.
highly tinted or highly reflective. Window glass in the
drawings.
Entrance Corridors should meet the following criteria:
Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop
below 40%. Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not
exceed 30%. Specifications on the proposed window
glass should be submitted with the application for
final review.
Accessory structures and equipment
17
Accessory structures and equipment should be
A dumpster enclosure and pad are proposed along the south
Provide details regarding the
integrated into the overall plan of development and
end of the parking area. A drive-thru window structure is
drive-thru related items. Revise
shall, to the extent possible, be compatible with the
proposed on the north elevation and a walk-up window
the plan to indicate the color of
building designs used on the site.
structure is proposed along the south elevation. The design
the drive-thru related items.
and the materials proposed in both windows are minimalistic
Colors that are compatible with
and compatible with the rest of the building design. Several
the building design and that
drive -through related items are also proposed. The pre -order
minimize the visibility of these
and order board/digital order screen are located on the east
elements from the EC would be
side of the site and are not expected to have significant visual
appropriate.
impacts. The clearance bar for the drive-thru and the order
point canopy, depending on design, could have a negative
visual impact. Height, color, and illumination should be
minimal and coordinate with the building design to reduce
impacts.
18
The following should be located to eliminate visibility
The location(s) of mechanical equipment is not labeled on the
Show the location of mechanical
from the Entrance Corridor street. If, after appropriate
plan. Roof -mounted equipment is shown on the architectural
equipment (building and ground
siting, these features will still have a negative visual
drawings; however, it is elevated only slightly above the
mounted) on the site and
impact on the Entrance Corridor street, screening
parapet, so it is unclear whether it will be visible from the EC.
architectural plans and show how
should be provided to eliminate visibility. a. Loading
it will be screened from the EC.
areas, b. Service areas, c. Refuse areas, d. Storage
The site plan shows a dumpster pad and enclosure that will be
areas, e. Mechanical equipment,
visible from the EC. The dumpster enclosure detail on sheet
Revise the dumpster enclosure
f Above -ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence,
C1.3 notes an 8' concrete block wall. Concrete block is not
detail to specify materials that are
barbed wire, razor wire, and similar security fencing
typically an appropriate finish material for the EC. This
compatible with the building and
devices.
enclosure is oriented at an angle to the street, so that only the
north side would be visible from the street, but the 8' height
appropriate for the EC.
19
Screening devices should be compatible with the
design of the buildings and surrounding natural
makes it a prominent structure. A brick enclosure matching
vegetation and may consist of. a. Walls, b. Plantings,
the material of the main building would provide a more
and c. Fencing.
coordinated appearance.
21
The following note should be added to the site plan and
The standard mechanical equipment note is present on the site
Add the standard mechanical
the architectural plan: "Visibility of all mechanical
plan but not the architectural drawings.
equipment note to the
equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be
architectural drawings.
eliminated."
22-
Lighting
A lighting plan has not been provided with this submittal but
Provide a lighting plan with the
31
the bollard details on sheet C 1.3 of the site plan notes an
next submittal.
illuminated bollard.
Lan dsc in
7
The requirements of the Guidelines regarding
An 18' access easement runs along the western perimeter of
Revise the landscape plan to add
landscaping are intended to reflect the landscaping
the site. Beyond the easement is the Rt. 29 right-of-way,
an additional tree along the
characteristic of many of the area's significant
occupied in part by a wide grass strip. Consequently, the
frontage to achieve more
historic sites which is characterized by large shade
parcel's frontage landscaping is set back approximately 70'
consistent spacing and meet the
trees and lawns. Landscaping should promote visual
from the Rt. 29 pavement. The landscape plan shows three
minimum planting requirement.
order within the Entrance Corridor and help to
London Plane trees and interspersed ornamentals along the
integrate buildings into the existing environment of
western perimeter of the site. However, the spacing exceeds
the corridor.
40' near the travelways at the north and south ends and one
additional tree is needed to meet the requirements. Consistent
8
Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be
obtained by planting different types of plant materials
spacing will be difficult due to the width of the travelway at
that share similar characteristics. Such common
the south end of the site limiting the available planting area
elements allow for more flexibility in the design of
along the frontage; however, there appears to be space for a
structures because common landscape features will
large tree near the southwest comer of the site.
help to harmonize the appearance of development as
seen from the street upon which the Corridor is
Given the limited planting area provided, the location of any
centered.
freestanding sign that may be wanted, and its associated
32
Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor
landscaping, should be considered now to ensure an
streets should include the following:
appropriate appearance along the EC. (Note that sign
a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the
locations are approved with sign permit applications.)
Entrance Corridor Street. Such trees should be at least
3'/z inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the
ground) and should be of a plant species common to
the area. Such trees should be located at least every
35 feet on center.
b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to
the area should be interspersed among the trees required
by the preceding paragraph. The ornamental trees need
not alternate one for one with the large shade trees.
They may be planted among the large shade trees in a
less regular spacing pattern.
c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four
board fence or low stone wall, typical of the area,
should align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor
street.
d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the
foregoing plantings and fencing should be reserved
parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive
of road right-of-way and utility easements.
33
Landscaping along interior roads:
a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior
roads. Such trees should be at least 2% inches caliper
(measured six inches above the ground) and should be
of a plant species common to the area. Such trees
should be located at least every 40 feet on center.
34
Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways:
The proposal includes sidewalks along both the eastern and
Revise the landscape plan to show
a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all
western perimeters of the parking lot. The proposed frontage
large trees, at 40' on center and
interior pedestrian ways. Such trees should be at least
landscaping doubles as interior pedestrian way landscaping
2'/z" caliper at time of planting, in
2% inches caliper (measured six inches above the
along the western sidewalk. In the planting area east of the
the planting area east of the
ground) and should be of a species common to the
parking lot (which is bordered by another sidewalk on the
parking lot.
area. Such trees should be located at least every 25
east), a row of shrubs is proposed. Providing trees in this
feet on center.
planting area would help integrate the walkway, the drive-
Revise the landscape plan to
thru lane, and the related features into the site.
provide a row of shrubs along the
full length of the proposed
35
Landscaping of parking areas:
Shrubs are shown along the eastern perimeter of the
retaining wall along the southern
a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking
travelway/queuing lane for the drive-thru, but they abruptly
perimeter of the site.
areas, located 40 feet on center. Trees should be
end at the entrance to the drive-thru lane near the dumpster.
planted in the interior of parking areas at the rate of
An existing telephone easement and a portion of the proposed
Revise the landscape plan to
one tree for every 10 parking spaces provided and
retaining wall for the site runs through the planting area along
provide trees along the northern
should be evenly distributed throughout the interior of
the southern perimeter of the site, so trees may not be
perimeter of the site that does not
the parking area.
possible, but shrubs can typically be planted in these
conflict with existing oft -site
b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should
easements without conflict, and they would be appropriate to
landscaping.
measure 2% inches caliper (measured six inches
offset the impacts of the drive-thru lane and retaining wall.
above the ground); should be evenly spaced; and
should be of a species common to the area. Such tree
Between the northern perimeter of the site and the drive-thru
should be planted in planters or medians sufficiently
travelway, the row of shrubs continues, ending approximately
large to maintain the health of the tree and shall be
38' from the western property line. A row of trees is on the
protected by curbing.
adjacent property, but off -site landscaping is not typically
c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to
relied on to meet landscaping requirements. Trees along this
minimize the parking area's impact on Entrance
end of the site would help to mitigate the appearance of drive -
Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24 inches in
thru travelway, stacked cars, and related features, independent
height.
of off -site landscaping.
36
Landscaping of buildings and other structures:
a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along
the front of long buildings as necessary to soften the
appearance of exterior walls. The spacing, size, and
type of such trees or vegetation should be determined
by the length, height, and blankness of such walls.
b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site,
buildings, and other structures; dumpsters, accessory
buildings and structures; "drive thru" windows;
service areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at
least 24 inches in height.
37
Plant species: a. Plant species required should be as
The proposed plants are on the recommended species lists.
Revise the landscape plan to
approved by the Staff based upon but not limited to
But, a single species is proposed for the total quantity (172) of
increase plant diversity such that
the Generic Landscape Plan Recommended Species
shrubs. This lack of diversity does not support a healthy
no single species of tree or shrub
List and Native Plants for Virginia Landscapes
landscape.
exceeds 25% of the total proposed
(Appendix D .
for that plant type.
38
Plant health: The following note should be added to the
The note is present on the landscape plan.
None.
landscape plan: "All site plantings of trees and shrubs
shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at,
mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited.
Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only
to support the overall health of theplant."
Develo ment paffern, Site Development and layout
6
Site development should be sensitive to the existing
The site is accessed from Seminole Lane. The travelway and
None.
natural landscape and should contribute to the
parking area have an organized pattern.
creation of an organized development plan. This may
be accomplished, to the extent practical, by
The proposed commercial building is situated parallel to the
preserving the trees and rolling terrain typical of the
EC and the front elevation is approximately 45' closer to the
area; planting new trees along streets and pedestrian
Rt. 29 frontage than the existing building. An outdoor seating
ways and choosing species that reflect native forest
area is proposed between the building and the frontage that
elements; insuring that any grading will blend into the
helps to add interest and engage the EC street.
surrounding topography thereby creating a continuous
landscape; preserving, to the extent practical, existing
A striped crosswalk and pedestrian way are proposed to
significant river and stream valleys which may be
connect to the existing pedestrian way along Rt. 29.
located on the site and integrating these features into
the design of surrounding development; and limiting
The site has been previously developed. Existing landscaping
the building mass and height to a scale that does not
is proposed to be removed to accommodate the building,
overpower the natural settings of the site, or the
drive-thru travelway/parking area, and outdoor dining area.
Entrance Corridor.
Views around the site are not expected to be negatively
39
The relationship of buildings and other structures to
the Entrance Corridor street and to other development
impacted.
within the corridor should be as follows:
a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike
paths, and pedestrian walks should guide the layout of
the site.
b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor
street should be parallel to the street. Building
groupings should be arranged to parallel the Entrance
Corridor street.
c. Provisions should be made for connections to
adjacent pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems.
d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas
to provide continuity within the Entrance Corridor.
e. If significant natural features exist on the site
(including creek valleys, steep slopes, significant
trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical,
then such natural features should be reflected in the
site layout. If the provisions of Section 32.5.2.n of the
Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance apply, then
improvements required by that section should be
located so as to maximize the use of existing features
in screening such improvements from Entrance
Corridor streets.
f. The placement of structures on the site should
respect existing views and vistas on and around the
site.
Site Grai in
40
Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of
The site has been previously developed. While much of the
Increase the depth of the planting
the site to surrounding conditions by limiting the use of
existing grading is not being significantly altered, retaining
bed along the retaining walls or
retaining walls and by shaping the terrain through the
walls are proposed to establish the drive-thru travelway. The
revise the shrub to one with an
use of smooth, rounded landforms that blend with the
building and other site elements are expected to screen
upright habit and mature size
existing terrain. Steep cut or fill sections are generally
portions of these walls from view of the EC, but the walls will
suited to the available planting
unacceptable. Proposed contours on the grading plan
be visible from the EC across the entrance into the parking
area. Revise the landscape plan to
shall be rounded with a ten -foot minimum radius where
area/drive-thru lane. Wall heights do not exceed 6' and
provide a row of shrubs along the
they meet the adjacent condition. Final grading should
materials have not been identified. With the exception of a
full length of the proposed
achieve a natural, rather than engineered, appearance.
portion of the proposed retaining wall along the southern
retaining wall along the southern
Retaining walls 6 feet in height and taller, when
perimeter of the site, shrubs are shown at the base of the
perimeter of the site.
necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend with
walls. Continuing the row of shrubs to include the full extent
the landscape.
of the retaining wall along the southern perimeter of the site
Revise the plan to indicate
may help integrate the walls into the site. The proposed plant
retaining wall material, color,
is too large for the planting area, the majority of which is 3' to
manufacturer. A block in a muted,
4' deep. An alternate plant, preferably with an upright habit,
earth -tone color would be
or an increase in planting area will be needed.
appropriate.
41
No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within
The plans show a 20' landscape buffer/parking setback that
Show areas designated for
the drip line of any trees or other existing features
includes an existing tree line along the eastern perimeter of
preservation and tree protection
designated for preservation in the final Certificate of
the site, but no tree protection fencing is shown on the plans.
fencing coordinated throughout
Appropriateness. Adequate tree protection fencing
the plans.
should be shown on, and coordinated throughout, the
grading, landscaping and erosion and sediment control
fans.
42
Areas designated for preservation in the final
Certificate of Appropriateness should be clearly
delineated and protected on the site prior to any
grading activity on the site. This protection should
remain in place until completion of the development
of the site.
43
Preservation areas should be protected from storage
or movement of heavy equipment within this area.
20
Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be
There are no above -ground stormwater features proposed.
None.
designed to fit into the natural topography to avoid the
need for screening. When visible from the Entrance
Corridor street, these features must be fully integrated
10
into the landscape. They should not have the
appearance of engineered features.
44
Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required,
new drainage patterns) should be incorporated into
the finished site to the extent possible.
Signs
Signage is reviewed and approved by separate submission.
Sign applications are required for
However, the following preliminary comments are provided.
all proposed signs.
The ARB may require that the color and scale of standard
templates for trademarks, service marks, corporate logos and
graphics be modified.
The color renderings appear to show a channel letter
"Starbucks" wall sign and a cabinet style "Siren" graphic sign
on the west elevation and a "Starbucks" wall sign on the
south elevation. It is unclear if the signs are to be illuminated
but the appearance of the signs is minimal in nature. The
Siren sign will be required to have an opaque background (the
green portion of the sign) if internally illuminated.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. The architectural design: the gray color of the brick, the "blankness" of the side elevations, and the appropriateness of a mural.
2. Visibility of rooftop equipment; appropriate screening.
3. Landscaping along the western side of the property: quantity and spacing.
4. Landscaping between the proposed parking area and the drive-thru travelway.
Staff recommends that the ARB forward the following recommendations to the Agent for the Site Review Committee:
• Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18-30.6.4c(2), (3) and (5) and recommended conditions of initial plan approval:
o Prior to Initial Plan approval the following items shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the ARB: None. The ARB recommends approval of the
Initial Plan without conditions.
• Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines: None.
• Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit: None.
• Regarding the final site plan submittal:
11
A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. The following items and all items on the ARB Final Site Plan Checklist must
be addressed:
1. Revise the design to establish a base that is evident on the side elevations.
2. Provide samples for all materials and colors.
3. Revise the design of the north and south elevations to incorporate architectural detailing to relieve blankness.
4. Revise the proposed design to create a better sense of human scale and coordination.
5. Provide details regarding the drive-thru related items. Revise the plan to indicate the color of the drive-thru related items. Colors that are
compatible with the building design and that minimize the visibility of these elements from the EC would be appropriate.
6. Show the location of mechanical equipment (building and ground mounted) on the site and architectural plans and show how it will be screened
from the EC.
7. Revise the dumpster enclosure detail to specify materials that are compatible with the building and appropriate for the EC.
8. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the architectural drawings.
9. Provide a lighting plan with the next submittal.
10. Revise the landscape plan to add an additional tree along the frontage to achieve more consistent spacing and meet the minimum planting
requirement.
11. Revise the landscape plan to show large trees, at 40' on center and 2%" caliper at time of planting, in the planting area east of the parking lot.
12. Revise the landscape plan to provide a row of shrubs along the frill length of the proposed retaining wall along the southern perimeter of the site.
13. Revise the landscape plan to provide trees along the northern perimeter of the site that does not conflict with existing off -site landscaping.
14. Revise the landscape plan to increase plant diversity such that no single species of tree or shrub exceeds 25% of the total proposed for that plant
type.
15. Increase the depth of the planting bed along the retaining walls or revise the shrub to one with an upright habit and mature size suited to the
available planting area. Revise the landscape plan to provide a row of shrubs along the full length of the proposed retaining wall along the southern
perimeter of the site.
16. Revise the plan to indicate retaining wall material, color, manufacturer. A block in a muted, earth -tone color would be appropriate.
17. Show areas designated for preservation and tree protection fencing coordinated throughout the plans.
18. Sign applications are required for all proposed signs.
12
ATTACHMENTS
• Attach. 1: ARB2021-07: Starbucks Initial Site Plan
• Attach. 2: ARB2021-07: Starbucks Architectural Drawings
TABLE A
This report is based on the following submittal items:
Sheet #
Drawing Name
Drawing Date/Revision Date
C0.0
Cover Sheet
1/19/2021
C1.0
Notes & Details 1
C L I
Notes & Details 2
C 1.2
Notes & Details 3
C 1.3
Starbucks Details & Proffers
C2.0
Existing Conditions
C2.1
Demolition Plan
C4.0
Layout & Utilities Plan
C5.0
Grading and Drainage Plan
C6.1
Inlet Drainage Area Plan
C7.0
Utility Profiles
L1.0
Landscape Plan
L2.0
Landscape Details
ARB-1.1
Elevations
1/18/2021
13