HomeMy WebLinkAboutWPO201400094 Calculations 2015-05-18 (2)HYDROLOGIC/HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS FOR
WHITTINGTON SUBDIVSION - PHASE B
May 18, 2015
LOCATION:
Tar. Map 90-3
Samuel Miiler District, Albemarle County, Virginia
DEVELOPER:
Staniey Martin Homes
11111 Sunset Hilts Road, Suite 200
Reston, Virginia 2.0190
PREPARED BY:
Dominion Engineering & Design, LLC
172 Sout.i Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
P: 434.979 8121
Email: mm.rersC 0mjrflwen .com
lUb. No. 33028
16"t%/J -V
;C�
�Q AL F``C'
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECT SUMMARY
AREA SUMMARY
CN VALUE COMPUTATIONS
SWM/BMP FINAL SUMMARY
SUMMARY OF "OVERDETENTION" CALCULATIONS FOR SWM-3
SUMMARY OF "OVERDETENTION" CALCULATIONS FOR SWM-4
WATER QUALITY VOLUME (WQV) COMPLIANCE CALCULATIONS FOR SWM BASINS
HYDROGRAPHS and Tc CALCULATIONS
PRE -DEVELOPMENT
DA-1.through DA-6
POINT OF ANALYSIS #1
DA-1U (Undetained)
POINT OF ANALSYS #2
SWM-3
POINT OF ANALYSIS #3
SWM-4
DA-3U (Undetained)
POINT OF ANALYSIS #4
SWM-1 (from approved WPO2013-00022 for phase A)
POINT OF ANALSYS #5
SWM-5
POINT OF ANALSYS #6
SWM-2 (from approved WPO2013-00022 for phase A)
SWM-6
SWM-7
SWM-8
DA-6U (Undetained)
REACHES 6A, 6B AND 6C
BMP CALCULATIONS
ADEQUATE CHANNEL CROSS -SECTIONS
DRIVEWAY CULVERT DESIGN
DROP INLET DESIGN — HAND COMPUTATIONS
SEDIMENT BASIN DESIGN COMPUTATIONS
PROJECT SUMMARY
This application is for Phase a of Whittington Subdivision. Phase A was approved for the construction of 17
lots and the stormwater management for Phase A was designed to meet the Technical Criteria of Part IIC of
the State Stormwater Code. The site work for Phase A has been completed and houses are currently under
construction. It is the developer's intention to seek approval of the remaining 79 lots in Phase B under the
same Part IIC criteria as allowed by the Grandfathering clause of the state code 9VAC25-870-48, which
states:
a. A. Any land -disturbing activity shall be considered grandfathered by the VSMP authority and shall be
subject to the Part11 C (9VAC25-870-93 at seq.) technical criteria of this chapter provided.,
1. A proffered or conditional zoning plan, zoning with a plan of development, preliminary or final subdivision
plat, preliminary or final site plan, or any document determined by the locality to be equivalent thereto (i) was
approved by the locality prior to July 1, 2012, (ii) provided a layout as defined in 9 VA C25-870- 10 (ilf)
will comply with the Part 11 C technical criteria of this chapter, and (iv) has not been subsequently modified or
amended in a manner resulting in an increase in the amount of phosphorus leaving each point of discharge,
and such that there is no increase in the volume or rate of runoff,
i) ZMA 2006-00011 was approved on April 11, 2007
ii) ZMA 2006-00011 contains a layout as defined by 9VAC25-870-10.
iii) The current plan complies with Part IIC technical criteria.
iv) The current plan has not been subsequently modified or amended in a manner that results in
an increase in either the amount of phosphorus leaving each point of discharge or the
rate of runoff leaving the site. Analysis and Computations are provided herein indicating
compliance.
2. A state permit has not been issued prior to July 1, 2014; and
A state permit for Phase B has not been issued prior to July 1, 2014.
3. Land disturbance did not commence prior to July 1, 2014.
Land disturbance in Phase B has not begun.
The Whittington subdivision has 6 points of analysis leaving the site. There is a drainage divide that runs
north -south that essentially divides the property in half. There are four outfall points (Points of Analysis #1-
#4) on the west side of the site, a minor outfall at the north side of the site (Point of Analysis #5), and one
outfall point on the east side (Point of Analysis #6) of the site. Based on computations provided herein, the
post -developed flows leaving the site are less than the pre -development flows at each outfall point of
analysis #146 for both the 2 and 10-year storm events, thereby meeting the runoff criteria of a)l.iv above.
Furthermore, on the west side of the site for points of analyses #244, we have further restricted the post -
development flow with "Overdetention" to pre -forested conditions to address posted complaints from an
offsite landowner, and to be consistent with the approved Phase A design. We have reduced the runoff to
point of analysis #1 to below predevelopment levels for the 2 and 10 year storm by virtue of reducing the
overall impervious area flowing to that outfall. Please also note that we have reduced the postdeveloped
impervious area that flows undetained to Point of Analysis #3.
In order to meet the phosphorus reduction requirements at each outfall point per a)l.iv. above, we have
reduced the phosphorus leaving the site at each outfall analysis point based on assumptions taken from the
ZMA. Refer to'ZMA BMP Drainage Area Map" in the VSMP plans for assumptions. Based on this, the
proposed BMPs decrease the amount of phosphorus leaving the site at each outfall point, thereby meeting
the phosphorus reduction portion of part a)l.iv above.
Furthermore, to indicate compliance with the state BMP regulations, we have completed the BMP
worksheets from the Virginia Stormwater Handbook to ensure compliance with the state regulations, and
have included the BMP worksheets in this calculations package.
In summary, the attached maps and calculations predicated on Part IIC Technical Criteria indicate that the
phosphorus and rate of runoff leaving the site as indicated on the approved ZMA 2006-00011 are not
exceeded by the current design, thereby allowing the site to be grandfathered from meeting the new II B
technical requirements of the state code.
4
AREA SUMMARY
PREDEVELOPMENT
Refer to Predevlopment Drainage Area Map in VSMP Plans
• DA-1 = 29.88 Acres (Point of Analysis #1)
• DA-2 = 4.61 Acres (Point of Analysis #2)
• DA-3 = 48.84 Acres (Point of Analysis #3)
• DA-4 = 12.20 Acres (Point of Analysis #4)
• DA-5 = 2.47 Acres (Point of Analysis #5)
• DA-6 = 134.48 Acres (Point of Analysis #6)
Refer to Postdevelopment Drainage Area Map in VSMP Plans:
• DA-1 = 25.57 Acres (Point of Analysis #1)
Contributing Hydrographs to Point of Analysis #1: DA-1U (Undetained)
• DA-2 = 12.90 Acres (Point of Analysis #2)
Contributing Hydrographs to Point of Analysis #2: SWM-3
• DA-3 = 46.99 Acres (Point of Analysis #3)
Contributing Hydrographs to Point of Analysis #3: DA-3U (undetained) and SWM4
• DA-4 = 12.20 Acres (Point of Analysis #4)
Contributing Hydrographs to Point of Analysis #4: SWM-1
• DA-5 = 2.59 Acres (Point of Analysis #5)
Contributing Hydrographs to Point of Analysis #5: SWM-5
• DA-6 = 129.96 Acres (Point of Analysis #6)
Contributing Hydrographs to Point of Analysis #6:
SWM-2, SWM-6, SWM-7, SWM-8, DA-6U (undetained), Reaches 6A, 6B, 6C
5
CN VALUE COMPUTATIONS
SUMMARY OF PRE -DEVELOPMENT CN VALUES
DA-1 (to point of analysis #1)
CN = 51 pre -forested condition (used CN=51 for Overdetention purposes)
DA-2 (to point of analysis #2)
CN = 51 pre -forested condition. (used CN=51 for Overdetention purposes)
DA-3 (to point of analysis #3)
CN = 51 pre -forested condition. (used CN=51 for Overdetention purposes)
DA-4 (to point of analysis #4)
CN = 51 pre -forested condition. (used CN=51 for Overdetention purposes)
DA-5 (to point of analysis #5)
Wooded Area, Fair, soil Group C (CN=73) - 1.82 Acres
Wooded Area, Fair, soil Group B (CN=60) - 0.65 Acres
1.82(73) + 0.65(60) = 70
2.47
DA-6 (to point of analysis #6)
Wooded Area, Fair, soil Group C (CN=73) - 46.13 Acres
Wooded Area, Fair, soil Group B (CN=60) - 88.35 Acres
36.13(73) + 98.35(60) = 64
134.48
SUMMARY OF POST -DEVELOPMENT CN VALUES
Assumed House Area = 2,500 sf
Assumed Driveway Area = 1,200 sf
Assumed Lead Walk Area = 100 sf
DA-SWM-1 (taken from approved WPO2013-00022 for phase A) (to point of analysis #4)
7.5 Houses (CN=98) - 0.430 Acres
8 Driveway and Lead Walk (CN=98) - 0.265 Acres
Roads (CN=98) - 1.921 Acres
Grass Yard Area (CN=74) - 3.357 Acres
Typical Wooded Area (CN=70) - 6.227 Acres
2.616(98) + 3.357(74) + 6.227(70) = 77
12.20
DASWM-2 (taken from approved WP02013-00022 for phase A) (to point of analysis #6)
6.25 Houses (CN=98) - 0.359 Acres
6.25 Driveway and Lead Walk (CN=98) - 0.284 Acres
Roads (CN=98) - 0.365 Acres
Grass Yard Area (CN=74) - 2.798 Acres
Typical Wooded Area (CN=70) - 7.174 Acres
1.008(98) + 2.798(74) + 7.174(70) = 74
10.98
DASWM-3 (to point of analysis #2)
10 Houses (CN=98) - 0.57 Acres
15 Driveway and Lead Walk (CN=98) - 0.45 Acres
Roads (CN=98) - 0.88 Acres
Grass Yard Area (CN=74) - 10.14 Acres
Untouched Wooded Area (CN=51) - 1.03 Acres
1.90(98) + 10.14(74) + 1.03(51) = 76
12.9
DA-SWM-4 (to point of analysis #3)
12 Houses (CN=98) - 0.69 Acres
16 Driveway and Lead Walk (CN=98) - 0.48 Acres
Roads (CN=98) -1.16 Acres
Grass Yard Area (CN=74) - 6.71 Acres
Untouched Wooded Area (CN=51) - 3.92 Acres
2.33(98) + 6.59(74) + 3.92(51) = 71
12.84
DA-SWM-5 (to point of analysis #5)
2.5 Houses (CN=98) - 0.14 Acres
Roads (CN=98) - 0.17 Acres
Grass Yard Area (CN=74) - 0.80 Acres
Wooded Area (CN=60) - 1.29 Acres
0.40(98) + 0.80(74) + 1.29(60) = 70
2.59
DA-SWM-6 (to point of analysis #6)
6.5 Houses (CN=98) - 0.37 Acres
5 Driveway and Lead Walk (CN=98) - 0.15 Acres
Roads (CN=98) - 0.48 Acres
Grass Yard Area (CN=74) - 9.29 Acres
Untouched Wooded Area (CN=51) - 1.30Acres
1.0(98) 9.29(74) + 1.30(51) = 73
11.59
DA-SWM-7 (to point of analysis #6)
7
6 Houses (CN=98) - 0.40 Acres
9 Driveway and Lead Walk (CN=98) - 0.30 Acres
Roads (CN=98) - 0.40 Acres
Grass Yard Area (CN=74) - 3.58 Acres
Untouched Wooded Area (CN=51) - 0.38 Acres
1.10(98) + 3.58(74) + 0.38(51) = 76
5.19
DA-SWM-8 (to point of analysis #6)
7.5 Houses (CN=98) - 0.34 Acres
10 Driveway and Lead Walk (CN=98) - 0.30 Acres
Roads (CN=98) - 0.70 Acres
Grass Yard Area (CN=74) - 3.64 Acres
Untouched Wooded Area (CN=51) - 1.20 Acres
1.33(98) + 3.64(74) + 1.20(51) = 75
6.17
NOTE: No SWM routing was performed on SWM-9
DA-SWM-9 (to point of analysis #6)
0.5 Houses (CN=98) - 1,250 sf
NOTE: No SWM routing was performed on SWM-9
DA-SWM-10 (to point of analysis #6)
0.5 Houses (CN=98) - 1,250 sf
NOTE: No SWM routing was performed on SWM-10
DA-3U (to point of analysis #3)
CN = 51 pre -forested condition.
DA-61.1 (to point of analysis #6)
Roads, Houses, Walks (CN=98) - 2.05 Acres
Wooded Area, Fair, soil Group C (CN=73) - 20.49 Acres
Wooded Area, Good, soil Group B (CN=60) - 68.56 Acres
Grass Yard Area (CN=68) - 4.92 Acres
2.06(98) + 4.92(68) + 20.49(73)+ 68.56(60) = 64
96.03
SWM/BMP FINAL SUMMARY
Impervious Area Treated Summary
As part of the overall SWM program, the proposed Best Management Practices treat more
impervious area than was treated on the ZMA Plan. Refer to "Impervious Area Treated" sheets in
the VSMP plan.
Impervious Area Treated with ZMA Plan: 490,778 sf
Impervious Area Treated with VSMP Plan: 507,420 sf OK
Overall SWM/BMA Summary
ZMA
POSTDEVELOPMENT
I NET CHANGE
PHOS
FLOW *'
PHOS
FLOW
IPHOSI
FLOW
LOAD'
QZ (cfs)
Q10 (cfs)
LOAD
QZ (cfs)
Q10 (cfs)
LOAD
Q2 (cfs)
Q10 (cfs)
POA-1
4.02
2.89
22.43
3.44
2.47
19.19
-0.58
-0.42
-3.24
POA-2
2.55
0.59
4.79
2.13
0.34
0.49
-0.42
-0.25
-4.30
POA-3
7.36
5.12
40.54
6.69
4.72
31.55
-0.67
-0.40
-8.99
POA-4
3.89
1.18
9.16
2.15
0.34
0.48
-1.74
-0.84
8.68
POA-5
0.83
3.36
7.71
0.52
3.19
7.37
-0.31
0.17
-0.34
POA-6
21.03
80.99
230.9
19.77
76.26
224.22
-1.26
4.73
-6.68
POA = POINT OF ANALYSIS
In order to demonstrate no postdevelopment increase in phosphorus leaving the site over ZMA
values, the following assumptions were made for the BMP facilities shown on the ZMA plan:
POA-1 - no BMP shown
POA-2 - BMP #1 - Raingarden -Removal Rate 65%
POA-3 - BMP #2 - Retention Basin I - Removal Rate = 40%
POA-4 - BMP #3 - Raingarden - Removal Rate = 65%
POA-5 - no BMP shown
POA-6 - BMP #4 -Raingarden - Removal Rate 65%
BMP #5 - Raingarden - Removal Rate = 65%
BMP #6 - Raingarden - Removal Rate = 65%
BMP #7 - Retention Basin II - Removal Rate = 50%
BMP #8 - Raingarden - Removal Rate = 65%
** In order to calculate maximum release rates that were used with the ZMA plan, we analyzed the
predevelopment runoff hydrographs to determine allowable release rates.
0
SUMMARY OF "OVERDETENTION" CALCULATIONS FOR SWM-3
Proposed SWM - 3 is a Retention Basin III and provides both water quality and detention for point of
analysis #2.
Because it has been determined that there are inadequate channels downstream, the allowable release rate
is determined per Albemarle County Design Standards Manual, Section F, lowering the allowable release
rate to a fraction of the pre -forested conditions runoff determined by the calculation below:
Q(allowable) <= Qf(Vf / VPost), where Qf is the flow from the site in a well forested condition (Cn = 51), Vf
is the volume from the site in a well forested condition, and VPost is the volume from the site in post -
development conditions.
In addition to meeting the above release rate requirements, the following conditions will also be met:
1. Detain the WQV (1" runoff) and release over 48 hours.
2. Detain the 1 year, 24-hour storm and release over 24 hours.
Pre Development Conditions
1.5 Yr. Pre -Development Run -Off = DA-2 = 0.463 cfs
1.5 Yr. Pre -Development Volume = 4,065 ft3
2 Yr. Pre -Development Run -Off = DA-2 = 0.587 cfs
2 Yr. Pre -Development Volume = 4,532 ft3
10 Yr. Pre -Development Run -Off = DA-2 = 4.787 cfs
10 Yr. Pre -Development Volume = 16,614 ft3
Post Development Conditions
1.5 Yr. Post -Development Run -Off = DA-SWM3 = 15.32 cfs
1.5 Yr. Post -Development Volume = 68,193 ft3
2 Yr. Post -Development Run -Off = DA-SWM3 = 16.15 cfs
2 Yr. Post -Development Volume = 71,695 ft3
10 Yr. Post -Development Run -Off = DA-SWM3 = 33.24 cfs
10 Yr. Post -Development Volume = 144,024 ft3
Allowable Release Rates
01.5 (allowable) = Q4VNp,,) = 0.463 cfs (4,065 ft3 / 68,193 ft3) = 0.028 cfs*
Q2 (allowable) = QKVNp,a) = 0.587 cfs (4,532 ft3 / 71,695 ft) = 0.037 cfs*
Q10 (allowable) = QKVfNp,*,) = 4.787 cfs (16,614 ft3 / 144,024 ft) = 0.552 cfs*
* As approved with the Phase A WPO Plan, since these release rates can only be achieved with
orifices that are less than 1" diameter, a minimum 3" diameter orifice is practical and has been used
in the calculations.
10
Detention of the WQV 11" Runoff) and release over 48 hours:
WQV = 3,454 ft3
Average Flow Rate to Achieve 48 hour drawdown:
2 x WQV = 6,908 ft3 / 172,800 seconds
Q = 0.040 cfs
Orifice Size needed:
A = Q / [64.32 " (h/2)]"' * (0.6)
Average h = 1'; Q = 0.040 cfs
A = 0.0067 sf
d = 2(A/3.14)05 = 0.1463 ft = 1.11 Inches
Orifice provided = 3.0 in **
** see note regarding minimum 3" orifice diameter on previous sheet
Detention of the 1 year 24-hour storm and release over 24 hours:
1 year 24-hour storm volume = 62,124 ft3
Average Flow Rate to Achieve 24 hour Draw Down:
Q = 71,017 ft3 / 86,400 seconds
Q = 0.72 cfs
Routed Flow for 1-year 24-hour storm = 0.33 cfs < 0.72 cfs.
11
SUMMARY OF "OVERDETENTION" CALCULATIONS FOR SWM-4
Proposed SWM - 4 is a Retention Basin III and provides both water quality and detention for point of
analysis #3.
Because it has been determined that there are inadequate channels downstream, the allowable release rate
is determined per Albemarle County Design Standards Manual, Section F, lowering the allowable release
rate to a fraction of the pre -forested conditions runoff determined by the calculation below:
Q(allowable) <= Qf(Vf / VPost), where Qf is the flow from the site in a well forested condition (Cn = 51), Vf
is the volume from the site in a well forested condition, and VPost is the volume from the site in post -
development conditions.
In addition to meeting the above release rate requirements, the following conditions will also be met:
1. Detain the WQV (1" runoff) and release over48 hours.
2. Detain the 1 year, 24-hour storm and release over 24 hours.
Pre Development Conditions
1.5 Yr. Pre -Development Run -Off = DA-3B = 0.583 cfs
1.5 Yr. Pre -Development Volume = 5,815 ft3
2 Yr. Pre -Development Run -Off = DA-3B = 0.736 cfs
2 Yr. Pre -Development Volume = 6,483 ft3
10 Yr. Pre -Development Run -Off = DA-36 = 5.936 cfs
10 Yr. Pre -Development Volume 23,767 ft3
Post Development Conditions
1.5 Yr. Post -Development Run -Off = DA-SWM 4 12.22 cfs
1.5 Yr. Post -Development Volume = 52,568 ft3
2 Yr. Post -Development Run -Off = DA-SWM 4 =13.01 cfs
2 Yr. Post -Development Volume = 55,604 ft3
10 Yr. Post -Development Run -Off = DA-SWM 4 = 29.69 cfs
10 Yr. Post -Development Volume = 120,250 ft3
Allowable Release Rates
Q1.5 (allowable) = Q1(^.m) = 0.583cfs (5,815 ft3 / 52,668 ft) = 0.064 cfs*
Q2 (allowable) = Q4Vf1Vp„1) = 0.736 cfs (6,483 ft3 / 55,604 ft) = 0.086 cfs*
Q10 (allowable) = Qf(Vf/Vp,*1) = 5.936 cfs (23,767 ft3 / 120,250 ft3) = 1.173 cfs*
* As approved with the Phase A WPO Plan, since these release rates can only be achieved with
orifices that are less than 1" diameter, a minimum 3" diameter orifice is practical and has been used
in the calculations.
12
Detention of the WQV (1" Runoff) and release over 48 hours:
WQV = 3,831 ft3
Average Flow Rate to Achieve 48 hour drawdown:
Q = 3,831 ft3 / 172,800 seconds
Q = 0.022 cfs
Orifice Size needed:
A = Q / [64.32 * (h/2)]°'S * (0.6)
Average h = 1'; Q = 0.022 cfs
A = 0.0170 sf
d = 2(A/3.14)0-5 = 0.1473 ft = 1.77 inches
Orifice provided = 3.0 in **
** see note regarding minimum 3" orifice diameter on previous sheet
Detention of the 1 year 24-hour storm and release over 24 hours:
1 year 24-hour storm volume = 70,140 ft3
Average Flow Rate to Achieve 24 hour Draw Down:
Q = 70,140 ft3 / 86,400 seconds
Q = 0.81 cfs
Routed Flow for 1-year 24-hour storm = 0.40 cfs < 0.81 cfs.
13
WATER QUALITY VOLUME (WQV) COMPLIANCE CALCULATIONS FOR SWM BASINS
SWM-3 WQV
Type of Facility: Retention Basin III
Water quality volume required = 4 X WQV
(4) (0.5'712) (82,898 SF Impervious Surface) = 13,816 ft3
Storage at Elev. = 476.00' = 62,406 ft3 > 13,816 ft3 OK
Pond Report
Hydrahow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD6 Civil 306 2014 by Autodesk. Inc. v10.3
Tuesday, 06 / 2 12015
Pond No. 3 - SWM-3 Storage
Pond Data
Contours -User-defined contour areas. Conic method used for volume calculation. Begining
Elevation a 471.99 It
Stage / Storage Table
Stage (ft) Elevation (I
Contour area (sgfr)
Inor. Storage (tuft)
Total storage (curt)
0.00 471.99
00
0
0
0.01 472.00
12.007
40
40
2.51 474.50
15,028
33,720
33.760
4.01 476.00
23,484
28,646
62.406
6.01 478.00
20.625
50,071
112,477
B-01 480.00
29.873
56,461
168.938
10.01 482.00
35,077
65.458
234,396
12.01 484.00
30,890
72,357
306,753
SWM-4 WQV
Type of Facility: Retention Basin III
Water quality volume required = 4 X WQV
(4) (0.5'712) (101,396 SF Impervious Surface) = 16,900 ft3
Storage at Elev. = 500.00' = 46,634 ft3 > 16,900 ft3 OK
Pond Report
Hydrafiow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCA06 Civil 3002014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3
Tuesday, 0612 / 2015
Pond No. 5 - SWM-4 Storage
Pond Data
Contours -User-defined contour areas. Conic method used for volume
calculation. Begining
Elevation = 495.99 ft
Stage / Storage Table
stage (ft) Elevation (ft)
Contour area (sgft)
[net. Storage (tuft(
Total storage (tuft)
0.00 495.99
00
0
0
0.01 496.00
9,290
31
31
2.57 498.50
11,214
25,690
25,621
4.01 500.00
15,593
20,013
45,634
8.01 502.00
17,647
33,117
78,751
8.01 504.00
19,618
37,142
115,893
10.01 506.00
21,800
41,401
157,294
12.01 508.00
24,108
45,890
203,184
14.01 510.00
26,525
50,609
253,793
14
SWM-6 WQV
Type of Facility: Retention Basin III
Water quality volume required = 4 X WQV
(4) (0.5'712) (43,510 SF Impervious Surface) = 7,252 ft3
Storage at Elev. = 534.5' as 42,110 ft3 > 7,252 ft3 OK
Pond Report
Hydraflow Hydrogniphs Extension for AutaCADS Civil 3D87 2014 by Aulodesk. Inc. v10.3 Tuesday, 06 / 2 12015
Pond No. 9 - SWM-6 Storage
Pond Data
Contours -User -defined contour areas. Conic method used for volume calculation. fiegining Elevation = 529.99 It
Stage / Storage Table
Stage (ft) Elevation (ft)
0.00
529.99
0.01
530.00
2.01
532.00
4.51
534.50
e.01
530.00
a.01
538.00
10.01
540.00
SWM-7 WQV
Contour area (sqft) In". storage (cuft) Total storage (cult)
00
0
0
7.763
26
26
8,921
18,889
16,695
11.408
25.415
42, 110
19.241
2$778
64,987
21,950
41,157
106.045
24.749
46.666
152,711
Type of Facility: Extended Detention Dry Pond
Water quality volume required = 2 X WQV
(2) (0.5-712) (44,148 SF Impervious Surface) = 3,679 ft"
Storage at Elev. = 462.00' = 13,590 ft3 > 3,679 ft3 OK
Pond Report
Hydrai Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 306 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Pond No. 11 - SWM-7
Pond Data
Contours -User-defined contour areas. Conic method used for volume
calculation. Begining Elevation = 459.99 It
Stage/ Storage Table
Stage In) Elevation (ft)
Contour area (sgft)
Incr. Storage (cult)
Total storage (cult)
0-00 459.99
00
0
0
0.01 460.00
5,457
18
18
2.01 462.00
8,210
13,572
13,590
4.01 464.00
10,356
18,523
32,113
6.01 466.00
12,756
23,068
55,181
8.01 468.00
15,675
28,378
83,559
10.01 470.00
18,758
34,383
117,943
Sunday, 05 / 17 / 2015
15
HYDROGRPAHS AND TC COMPUTATIONS
� 2Im14INI�njmj n
F �INIei�N le-Il Nlc-1
9 sItoINI'DI--*-I-4I�I�I
�sINI�ININI�I�IM
LA
Z
O
�
\
N
0
a-1
CA
N Ln
O
O
a
N
r01
'n
cCL
J
O
N
O
OJ
LL
=
N
2
H
N
vLnenmallo
O
w
M
1l
a 0
tc
t
m
M
M
ti
Z
W
J
~ �INlN c e Nl� si
H
LL
ri �n 0 d. Ln 'D P, OW. N N rl
O O
Z J
g N
aC =
W _
0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln
O rO In 0 0 0 ri M
Z N a -I N a -I N ci ci
W
J
ri N m m a n �o
M
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M
M
c-i
m
O
Ln
O
N
1I1
N
P
�O
to
M
rl
M
N
M
N
c-1
rl
c-1
N
N
l0
ei
VI
N
O
GO
O
c-1
N
O
M
N
dam'
0�1
Ln
Ln
O
n
N
CO
in
Ln
N
N
M
c-I
N
rl
rl
rl
rl
N
a
a
N
O
M^
a
N
M
tno
W
�
of
O
m
N
a
V7
rl
rl
N
r7
0if
a
vOi
o
a
0
0
m
l0
N
c-1
ci
Iz
N
co
CD
N
N
N
^
rl
eMi
ul
N
V
O
10
M
Ln
cn
N
O
S
S
O
u0i
S
M
a
In
O
r
G?3¢a
O
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ln
O
ci
of
N
rl
O
a
c-I
m
O
ci
M
n
rl
O
n
ci
N
n
ci
W
n
a -I
N
a
Ln
Ii
T
00
co
00
N
fn
N
en
O1
ri
rl
ei
eel
CD
Ln
n
W
In
Ln
r
to
N
w
e
oo
inr
N
N
rl
O
N
O
N
N
N
M
m
w
N
Un
0
In
0
V1
0
to
0
In
0
M
0
rn
0
V1
0
OR
sT
N
W
N N
W.
N
N
W
N
W
V
N
N
Ol
rl
N
T
c-I
W
rt
N
m
N
I'D
N
m
N
m
N
'D
a
w
a
m
N
WWWWW
lD
D
00
W
00
a0
OD
Ln
L
W
ci
O
rl
O
rl
O
ei
O
rl
O
rl
O
rl
O
O
rl
0
¢
0
a¢¢
0
0
a
a
a
a
PRE -DEVELOPMENT
Hydrograph Report
HydraBow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3002014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3 Monday, 05 / 18 / 2015
Hyd. No. 1
DA-1 Predevelopment
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 2.885 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.30 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 29,655 cuft
Drainage area
= 29.880 ac
Curve number
= 51
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 25.30 min
Total precip.
= 3.70 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 1
DA-1 Predevelopment
Hyd. No. 1 -- 2 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Q (cfs)
3.00
2.00
1.00
---L- 0.00
26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydreflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3DS 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3 Monday, 05 / 18 / 2015
Hyd. No. 1
DA-1 Predevelopment
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 22.43 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.20 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 108,717 cuft
Drainage area
= 29.880 ac
Curve number
= 51
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 25.30 min
Total precip.
= 5.60 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (Cfs)
24.00
20.00
16.00
12.00
M
4.00
0.00 '
0 2 4
Hyd No. 1
DA-1 Predevelopment
Hyd. No. 1 — 10 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16
Q (cfs)
24.00
20.00
16.00
12.00
M
4.00
0.00
18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D0 2014 byAutodesk, Inc. 00.3
Hyd. No. 1
DA-1 Predevelopment
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Drainage area
= 29.880 ac
Curve number
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
Total precip.
= 9.10 in
Distribution
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
Q (cfs)
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
DA-1 Predevelopment
Hyd. No. 1 —100 Year
0.00
0 120 240 360 480 600
— Hyd No. 1
Wednesday, 06 13 / 2015
= 84.66 cfs
= 730 min
= 327,758 cuft
= 51
= Oft
= 25.30 min
= Type II
= 484
Q (cfs)
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
' ' ' ' 0.00
720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
Time (min)
Hydrograph Report
HydraBow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3082014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3 Monday, 05 / 18 / 2016
Hyd. No. 2
DA-2 Predevelopment
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 0.587 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.13 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 4,532 cuft
Drainage area
= 4.610 ac
Curve number
= 51
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 16.00 min
Total precip.
= 3.70 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
0 2 4
Hyd No. 2
DA-2 Predevelopment
Hyd. No. 2 — 2 Year
Q (cfs)
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
D.60
1.50
1.40
M
■��riri��t���ri�IN
sriTime (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3DO2014 by Autodesk, Inc, v10.3
Hyd. No. 2
DA-2 Predevelopment
Monday, 05 / 18 / 2015
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 4.787 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.07 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 16,614 cuft
Drainage area
= 4.610 ac
Curve number
= 51
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 16.00 min
Total precip.
= 5.60 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (Cfs)
5.00 -
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 2
DA-2 Predevelopment
Hyd. No. 2 —10 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16
Q (cfs)
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutcCAD® Civil 3DO2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Hyd. No. 2
DA-2 Predevelopment
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Drainage area
= 4.610 ac
Curve number
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
Total precip.
= 9.10 in
Distribution
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
Q (Cfs)
18.00
16,00
12.00
i0
. M
3.00
0.00
0 120 240 360 480
Hyd No. 2
DA-2 Predevelopment
Hyd. No. 2 -- 100 Year
M.
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
= 17.20 cfs
= 724 min
= 50,086 cuft
= 51
= Oft
= 16.00 min
= Type II
= 484
Q (cfs)
18.00
15.00
12.00
19 r1
OL74
' ' ' ' ' 0.00
720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
Time (min)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3 Monday, 05 / 18 / 2015
Hyd. No. 3
DA-3 Predevelopment
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 5.118 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.23 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 50,121 cult
Drainage area
= 48.840 ac
Curve number
= 51
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 23.20 min
Total precip.
= 3.70 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
6.00
5.00
4.00
� Ml
2.00
1.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 3
DA-3 Predevelopment
Hyd. No. 3 -- 2 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16
Q (cfs)
5.00
rM
4.00
2.00
0.00
18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3 Monday, 05/18/2015
Hyd. No. 3
DA-3 Predevelopment
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 40.54 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.17 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 183,746 tuft
Drainage area
= 48.840 ac
Curve number
= 51
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 23.20 min
Total precip.
= 5.60 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (Cfs)
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 3
DA-3 Predevelopment
Hyd. No. 3 — 10 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16
Q (cfs)
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Hyd. No. 3
DA-3 Predevelopment
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Drainage area
= 48.840 ac
Curve number
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
Total precip.
= 9.10 in
Distribution
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
Q (cfs)
160.00
140.00
120.00
100.00
40.00
20.00
DA-3 Predevelopment
Hyd. No. 3 —100 Year
0.00
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840
Hyd No. 3
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
= 152.58 cfs
= 728 min
= 553,954 cuft
= 51
= Oft
= 23.20 min
= Type II
= 484
Q (cfs)
160.00
140.00
120.00
100.00
80.00
40.00
20.00
' ' 0.00
960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
Time (min)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 9
DA-3B (Used for pre -development SWM #4 routing)
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 0.736 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.17 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 6,483 cuft
Drainage area
= 6.430 ac
Curve number
= 51
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 17.50 min
Total precip.
= 3.70 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
pre-developmentDA-313 (Used for
e
11 --
Sri
rrrrr�rrrrr�i
rrrr�rrrrr�i
rrrrr�rrrr�i
rrrrr�rrrrr�i
rrrrr�rrrrr�i
rrrrr�rrrr�t
rrrrr�rrrr�t
rrrr�rrrrr�t
1 11
0
Hyd No. 9
�rrrr�rrrr�r�r�rr�rrrr�rrrrr�rrrr�rrrrr�rrrror
■rrrr�rrrr�rrrrr�t �������
■�rrrr�rr�i i.����r�r��
■rrrrr�rrrrr�rrrrr�i i ���������
■rrrr�rrrr�rrrrr�i t rrr�rrrr�rrrrr�rrrrirrrrr�rrrr�rrrrr�
■rrrrr�rrrrr�rrrrr�i t �������
■rrrrrrlrr�rrrrrrllrrrrrlrrrrrrlrrrrrrlrrrrrrlrrrrrrlrrrrr�rrrrr� 1 .1
rrrrrr�rrrrr�rrrrr� i �������
rrrrr�rrrr�rrrr� rrr� �����
■rrrrr�rrrrr�rrrrr� ■ ������� 1 1
rrrrrr�rrrrr�rrrrr� ■ �������
rrrrr�rrrr�rrrr� ■ �������
rrrrr�rrrrr�rrrrr� ■
rrrrrr�rrrrr�rrrrr� ■ ������� , , ,
rrr�rrrrr�rrrrr� ■ �������
rrrrrr�rrrr�rrrr� � �������
rrrrrr�rrrr�rrrr���������
rrrrrr�rrrrr�rrrrr� ��������� 1 1
rrrrr�rrrrr�rrrr� ��������
rrrrr�rrrrr�lrr■r� ��������
rrrrrr�rrrrr�rrrrr��������� 1 1
rrrrrr�rrrrr�rrrr� �����
rrrrrr�rrrr�rrrrr� � �����
rarrrrrr■rrrrrr■rrrrr���- _���� 1 1
rarrrrr�rrrrr�rrrrr� ���—����
rarrrr�rrrr�rrrr� �������,�
ra�rrrrr�rrrr� rrrrr�rrrr� rrrr�rrrr�rr■■■�trrrr�
I���,rrrr�rrrrr�rrrr�rrrrr�rrrrr�rrrr� �
1 11
1 1
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO2014 byAutodesk, Inc. v10.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 9
DA-3B (Used for pre -development SWM #4 routing)
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 5.936 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.10 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 23,767 cuft
Drainage area
= 6.430 ac
Curve number
= 51
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 17.50 min
Total precip.
= 5.60 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00 '
0 2 4
Hyd No. 9
DA-3B (Used for pre -development SWM #4 routing)
Hyd. No. 9 — 10 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16
Q (cfs)
6.00
5.00
M
M
2.00
1.00
0.00
18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3Di9 2014 byAutodesk, Inc. v10.3 Wednesday, 06 13 / 2015
Hyd. No. 9
DA-3B (Used for pre -development SWM #4 routing)
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 21.91 cfs
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.10 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 71,651 cuft
Drainage area
= 6.430 ac
Curve number
= 51
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 17.50 min
Total precip.
= 9.10 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (ofs)
24.00
20.00
16.00
12.00
From
4.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 9
DA-313 (Used for pre -development SWM #4 routing)
Hyd. No. 9 — 100 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16
Q (cfs)
24.00
20.00
16.00
12.00
M
4.00
' 0.00
18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3DO2014 byAutadesK Inc. 00.3 Monday, 05 118 / 2015
Hyd. No. 4
DA-4 Predevelopment
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 1.178 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.30 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 12,108 cuft
Drainage area
= 12.200 ac
Curve number
= 51
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= TR55
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 26.90 min
Total precip.
= 3.70 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (Cfs)
2.00
1.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 4
DA-4 Predevelopment
Hyd. No. 4 — 2 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Q (Cfs)
2.00
1.00
0.00
26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydreflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 byAutodesK Inc, v10.3 Monday, 05 / 18 / 2015
Hyd. No. 4
DA-4 Predevelopment
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 9.158 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.20 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 44,389 cuft
Drainage area
= 12.200 ac
Curve number
= 51
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= TR55
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 26.90 min
Total precip.
= 5.60 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
10.00
M
.m
4.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 4
DA-4 Predevelopment
Hyd. No. 4 --10 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16
Q (cfs)
10.00
. OU
4.00
2.00
0.00
18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydreflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3
Hyd. No. 4
DA-4 Predevelopment
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Drainage area
= 12.200 ac
Curve number
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
Tc method
= TR55
Time of conc. (Tc)
Total precip.
= 9.10 in
Distribution
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
Q (cfs)
35.00
25.00
r1 11
15.00
10.00
5.00
DA-4 Predevelopment
Hyd. No. 4 --100 Year
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
= 34.57 cfs
= 730 min
= 133,823 cuft
= 51
= Oft
= 26.90 min
= Type II
= 484
Q (cfs)
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00 ' I I I I— ' ' ' ' ' ' 0.00
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
Hyd No. 4 Time (min)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3 Thursday, 05 / 2B / 2015
Hyd. No. 5
DA-5 Predevelopment
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 3.356 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.07 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 9,911 cult
Drainage area
= 2.470 ac
Curve number
= 70
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 16.50 min
Total precip.
= 3.70 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
4.00 -
r 81
rM
1.00
0.00 =
0 2 4
Hyd No. 5
DA-5 Predevelopment
Hyd. No. 5 -- 2 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Q (cfs)
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
-1- 0.00
26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
HydraBow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3002014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3 Thursday, 05 / 28 12015
Hyd. No. 5
DA-5 Predevelopment
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 7.712 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.03 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 21,781 cuft
Drainage area
= 2.470 ac
Curve number
= 70
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 16.50 min
Total precip.
= 5.60 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Ir
4.00
2.00
'1LT27
0 2 4
Hyd No. 5
DA-5 Predevelopment
Hyd. No. 5 —10 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Q (cfs)
8.00
MY
4.00
WN
26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCiAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3
Hyd. No. 5
DA-5 Predevelopment
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Drainage area
= 2.470 ac
Curve number
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
Total precip.
= 9.10 in
Distribution
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
Q (cfs)
18.00
16.00
12.00
or
AM
3.00
0.00
0 120 240
Hyd No. 5
360 480
DA-5 Predevelopment
Hyd. No. 5 --100 Year
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
= 16.88 cfs
= 722 min
= 47,409 cuft
= 70
= Oft
= 16.50 min
= Type II
= 484
Q (cfs)
18.00
15.00
12.00
• rY
M
3.00
T 000
600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
Time (min)
Hydrograph Report
HydraFlow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3 Tuesday, 06 / 2 / 2015
Hyd. No. 6
DA-6 Predevelopment
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 80.99 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.20 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 394,725 cuft
Drainage area
= 134.480 ac
Curve number
= 64
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 29.00 min
Total precip.
= 3.70 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
DA-6 Predevelopment
Q (°fs) Hyd. No. 6 — 2 Year
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 6
6 8
Q (cfs)
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3138 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3 Tuesday, 06 / 2 12016
Hyd. No. 6
DA-6 Predevelopment
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 230.90 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.20 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 967,897 cuft
Drainage area
= 134.480 ac
Curve number
= 64
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 29.00 min
Total precip.
= 5.60 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
240.00
210.00
180.00
150.00
120.00
30.00
0.00 L
0 2 4
Hyd No. 6
DA-6 Predevelopment
Hyd. No. 6 —10 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16
Q (cfs)
240.00
210.00
180.00
150,00
120.00
•M
- �s
cO M
0.00
18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. AM
Hyd. No. 6
DA-6 Predevelopment
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Drainage area
= 134.480 ac
Curve number
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
Total precip.
= 9.10 in
Distribution
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
DA-6 Predevelopment
Hyd. No. 6 --100 Year
560.00
480.00
F��
320.00
240.00
160.00
0.00
0 120 240 360 480 600
Hyd No. 6
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
= 568.40 cfs
= 730 min
= 2,282,899 cuft
= 64
= Oft
= 29.00 min
= Type II
= 484
Q (Cfs)
640.00
560.00
480.00
400.00
320.00
240.00
160.00
0.00
720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
Time (min)
HYDROGRPAHS AND TC CALCULATIONS
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D0 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3 Tuesday, 06 / 2 / 2016
Hyd. No. 8
DA-1 U
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 2.469 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.30 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 25,377 cuft
Drainage area
= 25.570 ac
Curve number
= 51
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 25.30 min
Total precip.
= 3.70 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00 a
0 2 4
Hyd No. 8
DA-1 U
Hyd. No. 8 — 2 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Q (cfs)
3.00
2.00
1.00
1 0.00
26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3 Tuesday, 06 / 2 / 2015
Hyd. No. 8
DA-1 U
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 19.19 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.20 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 93,035 cuft
Drainage area
= 25.570 ac
Curve number
= 51
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 25.30 min
Total precip.
= 5.60 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
21.00 -
18.00
15.00
12.00
• rM
. rr
3.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 8
DA-1 U
Hyd. No. 8 — 10 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16
Q (cfs)
21.00
18.00
15.00
12.00
• rr
M
3.00
' ' ' ' 0.00
18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow.Hydrographs Extension forAuW-AM Civil 3DO2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2016
Hyd. No. 8
DA-1 U
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 72.45 cfs
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.17 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 280,480 cuft
Drainage area
= 25.570 ac
Curve number
= 51
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 25.30 min
Total precip.
= 9.10 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
80.00
70.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
10.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 8
G
DA-1 U
Hyd. No. 8 --100 Year
Q (cfs)
80.00
70.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
POINT OF ANALYSIS #2
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 3
DA-SWM-3 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 16.15 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.23 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 71,695 cuft
Drainage area
= 12.900 ac
Curve number
= 76
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 32.30 min
Total precip.
= 3.70 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
18.00
15.00
12.00
• 11
. M
3.00
0.00 1
0 2 4
Hyd No. 3
DA-SWM-3 Inflow
Hyd. No. 3 -- 2 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16
Q (cfs)
18.00
15.00
12.00
M
M
'I 1 11 0.00
18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Hyd. No. 3
DA-SWM-3 Inflow
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 33.24 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.20 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 144,024 cult
Drainage area
= 12.900 ac
Curve number
= 76
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 32.30 min
Total precip.
= 5.60 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (ofs)
35.00
30.00
26,00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 3
0
DA-SWM-3 Inflow
Hyd. No. 3 —10 Year
Q (Cfs)
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
i- — ' 0.00
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DD 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 12016
Hyd. No. 3
DA-SWM-3 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 67.43 cfs
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.20 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 292,452 cuft
Drainage area
= 12.900 ac
Curve number
= 76
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 32.30 min
Total precip.
= 9.10 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
raim11
DA-SWM-3 Inflow
Hyd. No. 3 --100 Year
Q (cfs)
70.00
TI r0
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
PLO J1
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
-- Hyd No. 3
Pond Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Pond No. 4 - SWM-3
Pond Data
Contours -User-defined contour areas. Conic method used for
volume calculation. Begining
Elevation = 475.99 ft
Stage / Storage Table
Stage (ft) Elevation (ft)
Contour area (sgft)
Incr. Storage (tuft)
Total storage (tuft)
0.00 475.99
00
0
0
0.01 476.00
23,469
78
78
0.51 476.50
24,241
11,926
12,004
2.01 478.00
26,610
38,121
50,125
4.01 480.00
29,858
56,431
106,556
6.01 482.00
33,224
63,046
169,602
8.01 484.00
36,630
69,819
239,421
Culvert / Orifice Structures
[A]
[B]
[C]
[PrfRsr]
Rise (in)
= 24.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
Span (in)
24.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
No. Barrels
= 1
1
0
0
Invert El. (ft)
476.00
476.00
0.00
0.00
Length (ft)
= 47.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Slope (%)
= 1.06
0.00
0.00
n/a
N-Value
= .013
.013
.013
n/a
Orifice Coeff.
= 0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
Multi -Stage
= n/a
Yes
No
No
Stage (ft)
10.00
8.0c
8.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
0.0 20.0
Total Q
Weir Structures
Tuesday, 0612 / 2015
[A]
[B]
[C]
[D]
Crest Len (ft)
= 12.57
12.00
0.00
0.00
Crest El. (ft)
480.60
481.70
0.00
0.00
Weir Coeff.
3.33
3.33
3,33
3.33
Weir Type
1
Rect
Multi -Stage
= Yes
No
No
No
Exfil.(in/hr) = 0,000 (by Wet area)
TW Elev. (ft) = 0.00
Note: CuNertlOdfice outIlms an enalt29d under Wet (ie) and millet (oe) emaoL Yyelr deers etwdeed for oriece conditions (le) and aubmergence (a).
Stage / Discharge
Elev (ft)
485.99
483.
481.
479.
477.1
40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0
99
I9
)9
5
475.99
180.0
Discharge (cfs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 31382014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3
Hyd. No. 4
SWM-3 Routed
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge
Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak
Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume
Inflow hyd. No. = 3 - DA-SWM-3 Inflow Max. Elevation
Reservoir name = SWM-3 Max. Storage
Storage Indication method used.
SWM-3 Routed
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4 -- 2 Year
Wednesday, 06 / 3 12015
= 0.337 cfs
= 24.20 hrs
= 66,680 cuft
= 478.26 ft
= 57,525 cuft
Q (cfs)
18.00
18.00
15.00
15.00
12.00
12.00
9.00
9.00
6.00
6.00
3.00
3.00
0.00
0 10 20 30
— Hyd No. 4 — Hyd No.
0.00
40 50 60 70 80 90 100
3 CrTT-FII Total storage used = 57,525 cuft Time (hrs)
I Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension fdrAutoCAD® Civil 3DO2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2016
Hyd. No. 4
SWM-3 Routed
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
= 0.487 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 24.27 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 114,867 tuft
Inflow hyd. No.
= 3 - DA-SWM-3 Inflow
Max. Elevation
= 480.52 ft
Reservoir name
= SWM-3
Max. Storage
= 122,992 cuft
Storage Indication method used
Q (cfs)
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
SWM-3 Routed
Hyd. No. 4 — 10 Year
Q (cfs)
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
' 0.00
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Time (hrs)
Hyd No. 4 —Hyd No. 3 iL=Total storage used = 122,992 tuft
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Ciw13D®2014 by Autodeak, Inc. 00.3
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 4
SWM-3 Routed
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
= 28.41 cfs
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.60 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 261,759 tuft
Inflow hyd. No.
= 3 - DA-SWM-3 Inflow
Max. Elevation
= 481.38 ft
Reservoir name
= SWM-3
Max. Storage
= 150,123 cuft
Storage Indication method used
Q (cfs)
70.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0 8
Hyd No. 4
SWM-3 Routed
Hyd. No. 4 --100 Year
16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80
— Hyd No. 3 r Total storage used = 150,123 cuft
Q (cfs)
70.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
88
Time (hrs)
POINT OF ANALYSIS #3
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3
Monday, 05 / 18 / 2015
Hyd. No. 21
DA-3U
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 4.552 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 732 min
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 39,075 cuft
Drainage area
= 34.150 ac
Curve number
= 52
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= Oft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 23.20 min
Total precip.
= 3.70 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00 ' ' '
0 120 240 360 480
Hyd No. 21
-1
DA-3U
Hyd. No. 21 -- 2 Year
Q (cfs)
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
Time (min)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. A 0.3
Hyd. No. 21
DA-3U
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Drainage area
= 34.150 ac
Curve number
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
Total precip.
= 5.60 in
Distribution
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
Q (cfs)
35.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.06
DA-3U
Hyd. No. 21 —10 Year
0.00 1 1 1 I I I I
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840
Hyd No. 21
Monday, 05118 / 2015
= 31.28 cfs
= 728 min
= 136,917 cuft
= 52
= Oft
= 23.20 min
= Type 11
= 484
Q (cfs)
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
• 11
' ' ' '11,' 0.00
960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
Time (min)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 21
DA-3U
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 111.68 cfs
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.13 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 402,756 cult
Drainage area
= 34.150 ac
Curve number
= 52
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of cone. (Tc)
= 23.20 min
Total precip.
= 9.10 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
120.00
100.00
40.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 21
DA-3U
Hyd. No. 21 -- 100 Year
6 8 10 12
Q (cfs)
120.00
100.00
40.00
20.00
14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3D02014 byAubodesk, Inc. 00.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 5
DA-SWM-4 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 13.01 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.20 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 55,604 cuft
Drainage area
= 12.840 ac
Curve number
= 71
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= TR55
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 27.10 min
Total precip.
= 3.70 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
14.00
12.00
10.00
M
. Or
4.00
2.00
0.00 '
0 2 4
Hyd No. 5
6 8
DA-SWM-4 Inflow
Hyd. No. 5 -- 2 Year
Q (ofs)
14.00
12.00
10.00
EEO
IX
2.00
i i I 1 I 1 I I 1 0.00
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 300 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 5
DA-SWM-4 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 29.69 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.20 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 120,250 cuft
Drainage area
= 12.840 ac
Curve number
= 71
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= TR55
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 27.10 min
Total precip.
= 5.60 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
r1
f8TIT11
DA-SWM-4 Inflow
Hyd. No. 5 —10 Year
Q (cfs)
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
-M
TiTI
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Hyd No. 5 Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 5
DA-SWM-4 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 64.70 cfs
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.17 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 258,566 cuft
Drainage area
= 12.840 ac
Curve number
= 71
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= TR55
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 27.10 min
Total precip.
= 9.10 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
riTiT11
DA-SWM-4 Inflow
Hyd. No. 5 -- 100 Year
Q (Cfs)
70.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
1 11
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
— Hyd No. 5
Pond Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Tuesday, 06 / 2 / 2015
Pond No. 6 - SWM-4
Pond Data
Contours -User-defined contour areas.
Conic method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 499.99
ft
Stage / Storage Table
Stage (ft)
Elevation (ft)
Contour area (sqft)
Incr. Storage (tuft) Total storage (cuft)
0.00
499.99
00
0 0
0.01
500.00
17,593
59 59
2.01
502.00
17,547
35,136 35,195
4.01
504.00
19,618
37,142 72,337
6.01
506.00
21,806
41,401 113,738
8.01
508.00
24,108
45,890 159,628
10.01
510.00
26,526
50,610 210,238
Culvert / Orifice Structures
Weir Structures
[A] [BJ
[C]
[PrMsr]
[A] [B]
[C]
[D]
Rise (in)
= 24.00 3.00
0.00
0.00
Crest Len (ft) = 12.57 12.00
0.00
0.00
Span (in)
= 24.00 3.00
0.00
0.00
Crest El. (ft) = 506.80 507.80
0.00
0.00
No. Barrels
= 1 1
0
0
Weir Coeff. = 3.33 3.33
3.33
3.33
Invert El. (ft)
= 500.00 500.00 0.00
0.00
Weir Type = 1 Rect
-
-
Length (ft)
= 61.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Multi -Stage = Yes No
No
No
Slope (%)
= 1.00 0.00
0.00
n/a
N-Value
= .013 .013
.013
n/a
Orifice Coeff.
= 0.60 0.60
0.60
0.60
Exfil.(in/hr) = 0.000 (by Contour)
Multi -Stage
= We No
No
No
TW Elev. (ft) = 0.00
Note: Culyert/Or'Rice outflows are analyzed under inlet(ic) and oulM(oc) control. Weir risers chocked for orifice conditions(ic) and submergence (a).
Stage (ft)
12.00
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00 r 1
0.0 20.0
Total 0
Stage / Discharge
Elev (ft)
511.99
509.99
507.99
505.99
503.99
501.99
499.99
40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 180.0
Discharge (ofs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 20
SWM-4 Routed
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
= 0.349 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 24.00 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 54,673 cuft
Inflow hyd. No.
= 5 - DA-SWM-4 Inflow
Max. Elevation
= 502.31 ft
Reservoir name
= SWM-4
Max. Storage
= 40,948 cuft
Storage Indication method used.
SWM-4 Routed
Q (Cfs) Hyd. No. 20 — 2 Year Q (cfs)
14.00 14.00
12.00 12.00
10.00 10.00
8.00 8.00
6.00 6.00
4.00 4.00
2.00 2.00
0.00 0.00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
— Hyd No. 20 — Hyd No. 5 LLEEEEI, Total storage used = 40,948 cult Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO2014 byAutodesk, Inc. v10.3
Hyd. No. 20
SWM-4 Routed
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Inflow hyd. No.
= 5 - DA-SWM-4 Inflow
Max. Elevation
Reservoir name
= SWM-4
Max. Storage
Storage Indication method used
Q (cfs)
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
mot
0.00
0 10
Hyd No. 20
SWM-4 Routed
Hyd. No. 20 — 10 Year
20 30 40
— Hyd No. 5
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
= 0.533 cfs
= 24.17 hrs
= 111,499 cult
= 505.21 ft
= 97,443 cult
50 60 70 80 90
7= Total storage used = 97,443 cuft
Q (cfs)
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
-1 0.00
100
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydreflow Hydrogrephs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil3DO2014 byAutadesK Inc v10.3
Wednesday, 06 13 / 2015
Hyd. No. 20
SWM-4 Routed
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
= 14.95 cfs
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.67 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 238,064 tuft
Inflow hyd. No.
= 5 - DA-SWM-4 Inflow
Max. Elevation
= 507.29 ft
Reservoir name
= SWM-4
Max. Storage
= 143,197 cuft
Storage Indication method used
Q (cfs)
70.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0 10 20
Hyd No. 20
SWM-4 Routed
Hyd. No. 20 --100 Year
30 40
— Hyd No. 5
50 60 70 80 90
JTF- Total storage used = 143,197 cult
a (cfs)
70.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
1 0.00
100
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Monday, 05 / 18 / 2015
Hyd. No. 25
Combined SWM-4, 3U
Hydrograph type
= Combine
Peak discharge
= 4.723 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 732 min
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 93,747 cuft
Inflow hyds.
= 20, 21
Contrib. drain. area
= 34.150 ac
Q (cfs)
5.00
4.00
3.00
rM
1.00
0.00 ' '
ff
0 480
Hyd No. 25
Combined SWM-4, 3U
Hyd. No. 25 — 2 Year
960 1440 1920
Hyd No. 20
2400 2880
— Hyd No. 21
3360 3840 4320
Q (cfs)
5.00
M
3.00
r'P
1.00
==- 0.00
4800
Time (min)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Monday, 05 / 1812015
Hyd. No. 25
Combined SWM-4, 3U
Hydrograph type
= Combine
Peak discharge
= 31.55 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 728 min
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 248,415 cuft
Inflow hyds.
= 20, 21
Contrib. drain. area
= 34.150 ac
Q (cfs)
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00 '
0 360 720
Hyd No. 25
Combined SWM-4, 3U
Hyd. No. 25 -- 10 Year
Q (cfs)
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
10.00
. rx
0.00
1080 1440 1800 2160 2520 2880 3240 3600 3960
Time (min)
— Hyd No. 20 —Hyd No. 21
Hydrograph Report
Hydra6ow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 25
Combined SWM-4, 3U
Hydrograph type
= Combine
Peak discharge
= 112.14 cfs
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.13 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 640,820 cuft
Inflow hyds.
= 20, 21
Contrib. drain. area
= 34.150 ac
Q (cfs)
120.00
100.00
1 11
rl 10
40.00
0.00 ' 1'
0 2 4
Hyd No. 25
Combined SWM-4, 3U
Hyd. No. 25 —100 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16
Hyd No. 20 — Hyd No. 21
Q (cfs)
120.00
100.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
POINT OF ANALYSIS #4
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 1
DA-SWM-1 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 16.06 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.23 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 70,880 cuft
Drainage area
= 12.200 ac
Curve number
= 77
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 33.10 min
Total precip.
= 3.70 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (ofs)
18.00
15.00
12.00
• O
- IO
3.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 1
DA-SWM-1 Inflow
Hyd. No. 1 — 2 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16
Q (ofs)
18.00
15.00
12.00
•A
MA
i 1P
0.00
18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil XM 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 1
DA-SWM-1 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 32.46 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.20 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 140,452 cuft
Drainage area
= 12.200 ac
Curve number
= 77
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 33.10 min
Total precip.
= 5.60 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
we in
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 1
6 8
DA-SWM-1 Inflow
Hyd. No. 1 — 10 Year
Q (cfs)
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
. Ml
0.00
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 31392014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 1
DA-SWM-1 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 64.95 cfs
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.20 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 282,137 cuft
Drainage area
= 12.200 ac
Curve number
= 77
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 33.10 min
Total precip.
= 9.10 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
70.00
-I IX
50.00
40.00
C3 M
20.00
10.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 1
DA-SWM-1 Inflow
Hyd. No. 1 —100 Year
6 8 10 12 14
Q (cfs)
70.00
MO
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
16 18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Pond Report
HydreBow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCADS Civil 31382014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3 Monday, 05 / 18 / 2015
Pond No. 2 - SWM-1
Pond Data
Contours -User-defined contour areas.
Average end area method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 487.49 ft
Stage / Storage Table
Stage (ft)
Elevation
(ft)
Contour area (sqft)
Incr. Storage (tuft)
Total storage (tuft)
0.00
487.49
00
0
0
0.01
487.50
22,550
113
113
2.51
490.00
29,627
65,222
65,334
4.51
492.00
33,350
62,977
128,311
5.81
493.30
36,800
45,402
173,713
Culvert / Orifice Structures
Weir Structures
[A]
[B]
[C]
[PrfRsr]
[A] [B]
[C]
[D]
Rise (in)
= 24.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
Crest Len (ft)
= 12.57 12.00
0.00
0.00
Span (in)
= 24.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
Crest El. (ft)
= 491.80 491.90
0.00
0.00
No. Barrels
= 1
1
0
0
Weir Coeff.
3.33 3.33
3.33
3.33
Invert El. (ft)
= 484.75
487.50 0.00
0.00
Weir Type
= 1 Red
-
Length (ft)
= 75.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Multi -Stage
= Yes Yes
No
No
Slops (%)
= 1.00
0.00
C.00
n/a
N-Value
= .013
.013
.013
n/a
Orifice Coeff.
= 0.60
0.60
C.60
0.60
Exfil.(in/hr)
= 0.000 (by Wet area)
Multistage
= n/a
Yes
No
No
TW Elev. (ft)
= 0.00
Stage (ft)
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00 ' '
0.00 4.00
Total 0
Note.C.NorlJOrifice outflows are analyzed under inlet(ic) and "at (ac)control. Weir nears checked for orifice conditions(ic) and submergence (a)
Stage / Discharge
8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00 28.00 32.00 36.00 40.00
Elev (ft)
493.49
492.49
491 A9
490.49
489.49
488.49
-'- 487.49
44.00
Discharge (cfs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 2
SWM-1 Routed
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
= 0.338 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 24.17 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 65,617 cult
Inflow hyd. No.
= 1 - DA-SWM-1 Inflow
Max. Elevation
= 489.67 ft
Reservoir name
= SWM-1
Max. Storage
= 56,652 cult
Storage Indication method used
15.00
12.00
• 11
. 11
3.00
rr.,'ll
SWM-1 Routed
Hyd. No. 2 — 2 Year
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
— Hyd No. 2 — Hyd No. 1 Total storage used = 56,652 cuft
Q (cfs)
18.00
15.00
12.00
. 11
Cm
R
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3002014 by Autodesk, Inc, 00.3
Hyd. No. 2
SWM-1 Routed
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Inflow hyd. No.
= 1 - DA-SWM-1 Inflow
Max. Elevation
Reservoir name
= SWM-1
Max. Storage
Storage Indication method used
Q (cfs)
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
RUM
0.00 '�-
0 10
Hyd No. 2
SWM-1 Routed
Hyd. No. 2 —10 Year
20 30 40
— Hyd No. 1
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
= 0.479 cfs
= 24.27 hrs
= 113,081 cuft
= 491.73 ft
= 119,664 cuft
50 60 70 80 90
FE Total storage used = 119,664 cuft
Q (cfs)
35.00
30.00
25.00
20,00
15.00
10.00
5.00
1 0.00
100
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrogrephs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO M14 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Hyd. No. 2
SWM-1 Routed
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Inflow hyd. No.
= 1 - DA-SWM-1 Inflow
Max. Elevation
Reservoir name
= SWM-1
Max. Storage
Storage Indication method used
SWM-1 Routed
Hyd. No. 2 -- 100 Year
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
= 32.23 cfs
= 12.57 hrs
= 253,416 cuft
= 492.38 ft
= 141,607 cuft
r r s sssssssss�sssssssss�sssssssss�s�assssssss�sss>_�ssti���
50.00
40.00
20.00
10.00
RYMI
Q (cfs)
70.00
50.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
RTl
0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80
Time (hrs)
— Hyd No. 2 —Hyd No. 1 Total storage used = 141,607 cult
POINT OF ANALYSIS #5
Hydrograph Report
Hydrallow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3002014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 6
DA-SWM-5 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 3.519 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.07 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 10,392 cuft
Drainage area
= 2.590 ac
Curve number
= 70
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conic. (Tc)
= 16.50 min
Total precip.
= 3.70 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 6
DA-SWM-5 Inflow
Hyd. No. 6 — 2 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Q (ofs)
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
-1- 0.00
26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3DO2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3 Wednesday, 0613 / 2016
Hyd. No. 6
DA-SWM-5 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 8.087 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.03 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 22,839 cuft
Drainage area
= 2.590 ac
Curve number
= 70
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 16.50 min
Total precip.
= 5.60 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
10.00
Ma
.M
91551
2.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 6
DA-SWM-5 Inflow
Hyd. No. 6 —10 Year
6 8 10 12 14
Q (cfs)
10.00
rl r1
4.00
2.00
0.00
16 18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
HydraFlow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 6
DA-SWM-5 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 17.70 ofs
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.03 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 49,712 cult
Drainage area
= 2.590 ac
Curve number
= 70
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 16.50 min
Total precip.
= 9.10 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
DA-SWM-5 Inflow
Hyd. No. 6 -- 100 Year
• r r sssssssr.ssr_ssssssr•�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIII�III�llllllllllllllll�lllllllllllllllll.11lllllllllllll�r
15.00
12.00
.LO
3.00
.7mml
0 (ofs)
18.00
15.00
12.00
• r1
M
c r r,
rm
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
— Hyd No. 6
Pond Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3DO2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Tuesday, 06 / 2 / 2015
Pond No. 7 - SWM-5
Pond Data
Contours -User-defined contour areas.
Conic method used far volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 613.49
ft
Stage / Storage Table
Stage (ft) Elevation (ft)
Contour area (sgft)
Incr. Storage (tuft) Total storage (tuft)
0.00 613.49
00
0 0
0.01 613.50
912
3 3
0.51 614.00
1,150
514 517
2.51 616.00
2,366
3,443 3,961
3.51 617.00
3,134
2,741 6,701
Culvert / Orifice Structures
Weir Structures
[A] [131
[C]
[PrfRsr]
[A] [Bl
[C]
[D]
Rise (in) = 12.00 Inactive 0.00
0.00
Crest Len (ft) = 4.71 6.00
0.00
0.00
Span (In) = 12.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Crest El. (ft) = 614.50 615.40
0.00
0.00
No. Barrels = 1 1
0
0
Weir Coeff. - 3.33 3.33
3.33
3.33
Invert El. (ft) = 610.50 0.00
0.00
0.00
Weir Type 1 Red
-
-
Length (ft) 45.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Multi -Stage = Yes No
No
No
Slope (%) 4.44 0.00
0.00
n/a
N-Value .013 .013
.013
n/a
Orifice Coeff. 0.60 0.60
0.60
0.60
Exfil.(in/hr) = 0.000 (by Wet area)
Multi -Stage = n/a No
No
No
TW Elev. (ft) = 0.00
Stage (it)
4.00
3.0C
2.00
1.00
0.00
0.00 5.00
Total Q
Note: Culverl/Oriftce outtlows am analysed under inlet (ic) and ovust(oc) control Weir risen, Checked for orRce conditions(ic) and submergence(s).
Stage / Discharge
10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00
Elev (ft)
817.49
516.49
315.49
i14.49
u13.49
50.00
Discharge (cis)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3
Hyd. No. 24
SWM-5 Routed
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Inflow hyd. No.
= 6 - DA-SWM-5 Inflow
Max. Elevation
Reservoir name
= SWM-5
Max. Storage
Storage Indication method used.
Q (cfs)
4.00 -
3.00
'r J J1
Hum
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 24
SWM-5 Routed
Hyd. No. 24 -- 2 Year
Wednesday, 08 / 3 / 2015
= 3.193 cfs
= 12.10 hrs
= 9,186 cuft
= 614.85 ft
= 1,966 cuft
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Hyd No. 6 Q= Total storage used = 1,966 cuft
Q (cfs)
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
-L-- 0.00
26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Wednesday, 05 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 24
SWM-5 Routed
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
= 7.367 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.10 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 21,632 cuft
Inflow hyd. No.
= 6 - DA-SWM-5 Inflow
Max. Elevation
= 615.35 ft
Reservoir name
= SWM-5
Max. Storage
= 2,834 cuft
Storage Indication method used
Q (cfs)
10.00
. r�
4.00
2.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 24
SWM-5 Routed
Hyd. No. 24 --10 Year
6 8 10
— Hyd No. 6
12
Q (cfs)
10.00
8.00
. ti
4.00
— 0.00
14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Total storage used = 2,834 cult Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydratlow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2016
Hyd. No. 24
SWM-5 Routed
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 17.44 cfs
Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 12.07 hrs
Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 48,506 cult
Inflow hyd. No. = 6 - DA-SWM-5 Inflow Max. Elevation = 615.99 ft
Reservoir name = SWM-5 Max. Storage = 3,941 cuft
Storage Indication method used.
SWM-5 Routed
Q (efs) Hyd. No. 24 -- 100 Year Q (cfs)
18.00
18.00
15.00
15.00
12.00
12.00
9.00
9.00
6.00
6.00
3.00
3.00
0.00
0 2 4 6
— Hyd No. 24
0.00
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
— Hyd No. 6 Total storage used = 3,941 cuft Time (hrs)
POINT OF ANALYSIS #6
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension far AutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 7
DA-SWIM-2 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 13.24 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.20 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 54,996 cuft
Drainage area
= 10.980 ac
Curve number
= 74
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 28.50 min
Total precip.
= 3.70 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
14.00
12.00
10.00
wo
. 61
4.00
2.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 7
DA-SWM-2 Inflow
Hyd. No. 7 — 2 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16
Q (cfs)
14.00
12.00
10.00
1.1
M
13 re
0.00
18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodeak, Inc. 00.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2016
Hyd. No. 7
DA-SWM-2 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 28.28 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.17 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 113,654 cuft
Drainage area
= 10.980 ac
Curve number
= 74
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 28.50 min
Total precip.
= 5.60 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
30.00 -
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 7
DA-SWM-2 Inflow
Hyd. No. 7 -- 10 Year
6 6 10 12 14 16
Q (cfs)
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
4 rt
' 0.00
18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2014 byAutodesk, Inc. 00.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 7
DA-SWM-2 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 58.93 cfs
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.17 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 235,965 cuft
Drainage area
= 10.980 ac
Curve number
= 74
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 28.50 min
Total precip.
= 9.10 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
60.00
50.00
40,00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 7
DA-SWM-2 Inflow
Hyd. No. 7 -- 100 Year
6 8 10 12 14
Q (cfs)
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
16 18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Pond Report
os
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Monday, 05 / 18 / 2015
Pond No. 8
- SWM-2
Pond Data
Contours -User-defined contour areas. Conic method
used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 485.99 It
Stage / Storage Table
Stage (ft)
Elevation (ft)
Contour area (sqft) Incr. Storage (cuft) Total storage (cuft)
0.00
485.99
00
0 0
0.01
486.00
4,000
13 13
2.01
488.00
5,850
9,791 9,804
4.01
490.00
7,900
13,697 23.501
6.01
492.00
10,500
18,337 41,838
8.01
494.00
13,000
23,453 65,291
9.01
495.00
14,500
13,742 79,033
Culvert / Orifice Structures
Weir Structures
[A] [B]
[C] [PrfRsr] [A] [Bl [C]
ID]
Rise (in)
= 24.00 3.00
0.00
0.00 Crest Len (ft) = 12.57 14.00 0.00
0.00
Span (in)
= 24.00 3.00
0.00
0.00 Crest El. (ft) = 492.50 493.50 0.00
0.00
No. Barrels
=1 1
0
0 Weir Coeff. =3.33 3.33 3.33
3.33
Invert El. (ft)
= 486.00 486.00
0.00
0.00 Weir Type = 1 Rect --
-
Length (ft)
= 80.00 0.00
0.00
0.00 Multi -Stage = Yes No No
No
Slope (%)
= 1.00 0.00
0.00
n/a
N-Value
= .013 .013
.013
n/a
Orifice Coeff.
= 0.60 0.60
0.60
0.60 Exfil.(in/hr) = 0.000 (by Wet area)
Multistage
= n/a No
No
No TW Elev. (ft) = 0.00
Note: CulveMOnfice outflows are analyzed urtlx Inlet(b) and outlet(w) control. Weir dears diecked for orifice conditiors(Ic) and submerpance(a).
Stage (ft)
Stage I Discharge
Elev(ft)
10.00
495.99
8.00
493.99
6.00
491.99
4.00
489.99
2.00
487.99
0.00
0.0 10.0
20.0 30.0
40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 110.0
120.0
485.99
130.0
Total Q
Discharge (cfs)
Hydrograph
Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 12
SWM-2 Routed
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
= 0.535 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 17.83 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 54,968 tuft
Inflow hyd. No.
= 7 - DA-SWM-2 Inflow Max. Elevation
= 491.26 ft
Reservoir name
= SWM-2
Max. Storage
= 35,046 cult
Storage Indication method used.
SWM-2 Routed
Q (Cfs)
Hyd. No. 12 — 2 Year
Q (cfs)
14.00
14.00
12.00
12.00
10.00
10.00
8.00
8.00
6.00
6.00
4.00
4.00
2.00
2.00
0.00
0.00
0 6 12
18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66
Hyd No. 12
—Hyd No. 7 Total storage used = 35,046
Time (hrs)
tuft
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Hyd. No. 12
SWM-2 Routed
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Inflow hyd. No.
= 7 - DA-SWM-2 Inflow
Max. Elevation
Reservoir name
= SWM-2
Max. Storage
Storage Indication method used.
SWM-2 Routed
Hyd. No. 12 -- 10 Year
off ONE M-MMMMM-Mmmma
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
= 12.02 cfs
= 12.53 hrs
= 113,625 cuft
= 492.92 ft
= 52,559 cuft
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54
— Hyd No. 12 — Hyd No. 7 ]ate Total storage used = 52,559 tuft
Q (Cfs)
30.00
25.00
��ri
ill1fill
10.00
5.00
0.00
60
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydrallow Hydrographs Extension 1brAutoCAD® Civil 31392014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 12
SWM-2 Routed
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
= 52.76 cfs
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.27 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 235,936 cuft
Inflow hyd. No.
= 7 - DA-SWM-2 Inflow
Max. Elevation
= 493.92 ft
Reservoir name
= SWM-2
Max. Storage
= 64,350 cuft
Storage Indication method used.
Q (Cfs)
Cn nn
-ME
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
4
Hyd No. 12
SWM-2 Routed
Hyd. No. 12 — 100 Year
8 12
Hyd No. 7
Q (Cfs)
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
10.00
16 20 24 28 32
Uj= Total storage used = 64,350 cult Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
HydraOow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3138 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 9
DA-SWM-6 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 18.65 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.07 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 53,983 cult
Drainage area
= 11.590 ac
Curve number
= 73'
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= Oft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 15.00 min
Total precip.
= 3.70 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Composite (Area/CN) - [(1.120 x 98) + (2.690 x 74) + (9.100 x 70)] / 11.590
Q (cfs)
21.00 -
18.00
15.00
12.00
MO
3.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 9
DA-SWM-6 Inflow
Hyd. No. 9 -- 2 Year
6 8 10 12 14
Q (cfs)
21.00
18.00
15.00
12.00
• rV
. rr
3.00
0.00
16 18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 9
DA-SWM-6 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 40.32 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.03 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 113,213 cuft
Drainage area
= 11.590 ac
Curve number
= 73"
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 15.00 min
Total precip.
= 5.60 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Composite (Area/CN) = [(1.120 x 98) + (2.690 x 74) + (9.100 x 70)] / 11.590
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
@M
0 2 4
Hyd No. 9
DA-SWM-6 Inflow
Hyd. No. 9 --10 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Q (cfs)
50.00
40.00
30.00
OM
10.00
26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2016
Hyd. No. 9
DA-SWM-6 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 84.27 cfs
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.03 hrs
Time interval
2 min
Hyd. volume
= 237,754 cuft
Drainage area
= 11.590 ac
Curve number
= 73`
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 15.00 min
Total precip.
= 9.10 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
*Composite (Area/CN) = [(1.120 x 98) + (2.690 x 74) + (9.100 x 70)] 111.590
Q (Cfs)
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 9
l
DA-SWM-6 Inflow
Hyd. No. 9 — 100 Year
Q (cfs)
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
60.00
40M
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Pond Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutOCAD® Civil 3DO2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Tuesday, 06 / 2 / 2015
Pond No. 10 - SWM-6
Pond Data
Contours -User-defined contour areas. Conic method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 535.99 ft
Stage / Storage Table
Stage (ft) Elevation (ft)
Contour area (sqft) Incr. Storage (cuft)
Total storage (cult)
0.00 535.99
00 0
0
0.01 536.00
19,241 64
64
2.01 538.00
21,950 41,157
41,221
4.01 540.00
24,756 46,673
87,895
Culvert / Orifice Structures
Weir Structures
[A]
[B]
[C]
[PrfRsrl
[A]
[B]
ICI
[D]
Rise (in)
= 24.00
Inactive
0.00
0.00
Crest Lon (ft)
= 12.57
10.00
0.00
0.00
Span (in)
= 24.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
Crest El. (ft)
= 537.00
538.00
0.00
0.00
No. Barrels
= i
1
0
0
Weir Coeff.
= 3.33
3.33
3.33
3.33
Invert El. (ft)
= 532.00
536.00
0.00
0.00
Weir Type
= 1
Rect
-
-
Length (ft)
= 49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Multistage
= Yes
No
No
No
Slope (%)
4.00
0.00
0.00
n/a
N-Value
.013
.013
.013
n/a
Orifice Coeff.
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
Exfll.(In/hr)
= 0.000 (by
Wet area)
Multi -Stage
n/a
No
No
No
TIN Elev. (ft)
= 0.00
Note: CulvartrOrinp oudlowa am analyzed uridar ntel(!a) rid raat(oc) control. Weinman Cocked for cdfics conditiora(Ic) and eutaroreance(a)
LI r I I ., r I I .1 1, :I r • 1 1 11 1 I I, 1 1 .,,
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 31302014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3
Hyd. No. 13
SWM-6 Routed
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Inflow hyd. No.
= 9 - DA-SWM-6 Inflow
Max. Elevation
Reservoir name
= SWM-6
Max. Storage
Storage Indication method used
Q (cfs)
21.00 -
18.00
15.00
12.00
. ��
3.00
0.00
0 8
— Hyd No. 13
SWM-6 Routed
Hyd. No. 13 -- 2 Year
Wednesday, 05 / 3 / 2015
= 3.022 cfs
= 12.50 hrs
= 53,461 cuft
= 537.15 ft
= 23,700 cuft
16 24 32 40 48 56 64
Hyd No. 9 OT= Total storage used = 23,700 tuft
Q (cfs)
21.00
18.00
15.00
12.00
• r2
3.00
---1- 0.00
72
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Hyd. No. 13
SWM-6 Routed
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Inflow hyd. No.
= 9 - DA-SWM-6 Inflow
Max. Elevation
Reservoir name
= SWM-6
Max. Storage
Storage indication method used.
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
= 27.37 cfs
= 12.17 hrs
= 112,687 cuft
= 537.75 ft
= 35,972 cuft
SWM-6 Routed
Hyd. No. 13 —10 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Hyd No. 9 Total storage used = 35,972 cuft
Q (cfs)
50.00
40.00
30.00
!t out
10.00
26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Hyd. No. 13
SWM-6 Routed
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Inflow hyd. No.
= 9 - DA-SWM-6 Inflow
Reservoir name
= SWM-6
Storage Indication method used
Q (cfs)
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 13
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Max. Elevation
Max. Storage
SWM-6 Routed
Hyd. No. 13 --100 Year
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2016
= 61.66 cfs
= 12.13 hrs
= 237,223 cuft
= 538.83 ft
= 60,490 cuft
Q (cfs)
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Hyd No. 9 TIT= Total storage used = 60,490 cuft Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 10
DA-SWM-7 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 9.759 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.03 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 27,776 cuft
Drainage area
= 5.190 ac
Curve number
= 76*
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= TR55
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 13.50 min
Total precip.
= 3.70 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
*Composite (Area/CN) = [(1.650 x 98) + (6.730 x 74) + (2.300 x 60)]15.190
Q (Cfs)
10.00
M
MY!
4.00
0.00 ' 1'
0 2 4
Hyd No. 10
DA-SWM-7 Inflow
Hyd. No. 10 -- 2 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Q (cfs)
10.00
M
MIN
4.00
i ri
--1 0.00
26
Time (hrs)
i
Hydrograph Report
Hydragow Hydrogrephs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 10
DA-SWM-7 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 19.91 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.03 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 55,798 cuft
Drainage area
= 5.190 ac
Curve number
= 76+
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= TR55
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 13.50 min
Total precip.
= 5.60 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
• Composite (Area/CN)=1(1.650 x 98) + (6.730 x 74) + (2.300 x 60)] / 5.190
Q (Cfs)
21.00
18.00
15.00
12.00
• r1
. M
3.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 10
DA-SWM-7 Inflow
Hyd. No. 10 -- 10 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16
Q (cfs)
21.00
18.00
15.00
12.00
M
M
cM
' 0.00
18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydrafiow Hydrographs Extension fbrAutoCAD® Civil 3002014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Wednesday, 06 / 312015
Hyd. No. 10
DA-SWM-7 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 39.89 cfs
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.03 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 113,303 CA
Drainage area
= 5.190 ac
Curve number
= 76*
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= Oft
Tc method
= TR55
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 13.50 min
Total precip.
= 9.10 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
*Composite (Area/CN) = [(1.550 x 96) + (5.730 x 74) + (2.300 x 60)] / 5.190
Q (cfs)
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0 2 4
— Hyd No. 10
DA-SWM-7 Inflow
Hyd. No. 10 —100 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Q (cfs)
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
--10.00
26
Time (hrs)
Pond Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCADS Civil 3D0 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Tuesday, 06 / 2 / 2015
Pond No.11 - SWM-7
Pond Data
Contours -User-defined contour areas. Conic method used for volume calculation. Beg ining Elevation = 459.99
ft
Stage / Storage Table
Stage (ft) Elevation (ft)
Contour area
(sqft)
Incr. Storage (cult) Total storage (tuft)
0.00 459.99
00
0 0
0.01 460.00
5,457
18 18
2.01 462.00
8,210
13,572 13,590
4.01 464.00
10,356
18,523 32,113
6.01 466,00
12,756
23,088 55,181
8.01 468.00
15,675
28,378 83,559
10.01 470.00
18,758
34,383 117,943
Culvert / Orifice Structures
Weir Structures
[A] [81
[C]
[PrfRsr]
[A] [131
[C]
[D]
Rise (in) = 24.00 3.00
0.00
0.00
Crest Len (ft) = 12.57 12.00
0.00
0.00
Span (in) = 24.00 3.00
0.00
0.00
Crest El. (ft) = 466.70 467.70
0.00
0.00
No. Barrels = 1 1
0
0
WeirCoeff. = 3.33 3.33
3.33
3.33
Invert El. (ft) = 459.00 460.00
0.00
0.00
Weir Type = 1 Red
-
Length (ft) = 63.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Multistage = Yes No
No
NO
Slope (%) = 6.30 0.00
0.00
n/a
N-Value = .013 .013
.013
n/a
Orifice Coeff. = 0.60 0.60
0.60
0.60
Exfil.(In/hr) = 0.000 (by Wet area)
Multistage = n/a Yes
No
No
TW Elev. (ft) = 0.00
Stage (ft)
1
Note: Culven/Orifiaouffims am 2na1ynaurdw1rJa1(ie)adwM(w)we . Weir naaa dmkod fororMce wnaitlona(le) and submargence(a),
Stage / Discharge
Elev (ft)
471.99
2.00
0.00
8.00
46f
467
8.00
465
4.00
463
2.00
481.
).00
0.0 20.0 40.0 50.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 180.o 180.0
Total Q
.99
U
99
99
99
459.99
200.0
Discharge (cfs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3
Hyd. No. 14
SWM-7 Routed
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Inflow hyd. No.
= 10 - DA-SWM-7 Inflow
Max. Elevation
Reservoir name
= SWM-7
Max. Storage
Storage Indication method used.
Q (cfs)
10.00
4.00
2.00
0.00 -L
SWM-7 Routed
Hyd. No. 14 -- 2 Year
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
= 0.351 cfs
= 15.67 hrs
= 27,737 cuft
= 462.33 ft
= 16,650 cuft
Q (cfs)
10.00
1
- r�
' 11
100
).00
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60
Hyd No. 14 — Hyd No. 10 Total storage used = 16,650 cuft Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension fbrAutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Wednesday, 08 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 14
SWM-7 Routed
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
= 0.493 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 17.03 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 55,759 cuft
Inflow hyd. No.
= 10 - DA-SWM-7 Inflow
Max. Elevation
= 464.48 ft
Reservoir name
= SWM-7
Max. Storage
= 37,651 cult
Storage Indication method used.
Q (cfs)
21.00
18.00
15.00
12.00
4 11
• 11
5 11
1 11
SWM-7 Routed
Hyd. No. 14 -- 10 Year
Q (cfs)
21.00
18.00
15.00
12.00
. r1
;.00
ILTel
0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72
Time (hrs)
— Hyd No. 14 Hyd No. 10 I]Sr� Total storage used = 37,651 tuft
Hydrograph Report
Hydreflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Hyd. No. 14
SWM-7 Routed
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Inflow hyd. No.
= 10 - DA-SWM-7 Inflow
Max. Elevation
Reservoir name
SWM-7
Max. Storage
Storage Indication method used.
Q (cfs)
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0 8
— Hyd No. 14
SWM-7 Routed
Hyd. No. 14 —100 Year
16 24 32
— Hyd No. 10
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
= 3.587 cfs
= 12.73 hrs
= 113,264 cuft
= 466.86 ft
= 67,376 cuft
40 48 56 64 72
Total storage used = 67,376 cult
Q (cfs)
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
--� 0.00
80
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 11
DA-SWM-8 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 10.28 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.03 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 26,996 cuft
Drainage area
= 4.990 ac
Curve number
= 75*
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= TR55
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 11.60 min
Total precip.
= 3.70 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
* Composite (Area/CN) = [(0.990 x 98) + (3.130 x 74) + (1.040 x 70)] / 4.990
Q (cfs)
12.00
10.00
M
. 11
am
2.00
0.00 '
0 2 4
— Hyd No. 11
DA-SWM-8 Inflow
Hyd. No. 11 — 2 Year
6 8 10 12 14
Q (cfs)
12.00
10.00
. ME
4.00
NU
T� 0.00
16 18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®.Civil 3D0 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2016
Hyd. No. 11
DA-SWM-8 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 21.21 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.00 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 54,995 cuft
Drainage area
= 4.990 ac
Curve number
= 75"
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= TR55
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 11.60 min
Total precip.
= 5.60 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Composite (Area/CN) - [(0.990 x 98) + (3.130 x 74) + (1.040 x 70)]14.990
•
20.00
16.00
12.00
: ON
IA
bAIil
DA-SWM-8 Inflow
Hyd. No. 11 — 10 Year
Q (cfs)
24.00
20.00
16.00
12.00
4.00
iTM
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
— Hyd No. 11 Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodeek, Inc. 00.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 11
DA-SWM-8 Inflow
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 43.03 cfs
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.00 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 112,906 cuft
Drainage area
= 4.990 ac
Curve number
= 75*
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= TR55
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 11.60 min
Total precip.
= 9.10 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Composite (Area/CN) = [(0.990 x 96) + (3.130 x 74) + (1.040 x 70)] / 4.990
Q (Cfs)
50.00 -
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 11
DA-SWM-8 Inflow
Hyd. No. 11 -- 100 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Q (cfs)
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
. 0.00
26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCADO Civil 3CO2014 byAutodesk, Inc. A0.3
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 16
6A - SWM-2 Reach to POA 6
Hydrograph type
= Reach
Peak discharge
= 0.535 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 18.00 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 54,830 tuft
Inflow hyd. No.
= 12 - SWM-2 Routed
Section type
= Triangular
Reach length
= 1953.0 ft
Channel slope
= 3.1 %
Manning's n
= 0.030
Bottom width
= 0.0 ft
Side slope
= 2.0:1
Max. depth
= 0.0 ft
Rating curve x
= 4.394
Rating curve m
= 1.333
Ave. velocity
= 2.60 ft/s
Routing coeff.
= 0.1922
Modifled Att-Kin routing method used
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
rim
12 18 24
Hyd No. 12
• ' 1
Q (Cfs)
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
30 36 42 48 54 60
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3
Hyd. No. 16
6A - SWM-2 Reach to POA 6
Hydrograph type
= Reach
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Inflow hyd. No.
= 12 - SWM-2 Routed
Section type
Reach length
= 1953.0 ft
Channel slope
Manning's n
= 0.030
Bottom width
Side slope
= 2.0:1
Max. depth
Rating curve x
= 4.394
Rating curve m
Ave. velocity
= 5.65 ftts
Routing coeff.
Modified Att-Kin routing method used.
Q (cfs)
14.00
12.00
10.00
m
MY
4.00
2.00
0.00 '
0 6
— Hyd No. 16
6A - SWM-2 Reach to POA 6
Hyd. No. 16 —10 Year
12 18 24
— Hyd No. 12
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
= 10.67 cfs
= 12.63 hrs
= 113,488 cuft
= Triangular
= 3.1 %
= 0.0 ft
= 0.0 ft
= 1.333
= 0.3759
Q (cfs)
14.00
12.00
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
30 36 42 48 54 60
Time (hrs)
f Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Hyd. No. 16
6A - SWM-2 Reach to POA 6
Hydrograph type
= Reach
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Inflow hyd. No.
= 12 - SWM-2 Routed
Section type
Reach length
= 1953.0 ft
Channel slope
Manning's n
= 0.030
Bottom width
Side slope
= 2.0:1
Max. depth
Rating curve x
= 4.394
Rating curve m
Ave. velocity
= 8.18 fUs
Routing coeff.
Modred Att-IQn routing method used.
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
r rr
0 4
Hyd No. 16
i
6A - SWM-2 Reach to POA 6
Hyd. No. 16 —100 Year
12
Hyd No. 12
16
20
24
28
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
= 50.90 cfs
= 12.33 hrs
= 235,799 cuft
= Triangular
= 3.1 %
= 0.0 ft
= 0.0 ft
= 1.333
= 0.5019
32
Q (cfs)
60.00
50.00
•m
.r We
I r rr
36
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3
Hyd. No. 17
6B - SWM-6 Reach to POA 6
Hydrograph type
= Reach
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Inflow hyd. No.
= 13 - SWM-6 Routed
Section type
Reach length
= 2792.0 ft
Channel slope
Manning's n
= 0.030
Bottom width
Side slope
= 2.0:1
Max. depth
Rating curve x
= 4.752
Rating curve m
Ave. velocity
= 4.24 fUs
Routing coeff.
Modified Att-Kin routing method used.
Q (cfs)
4.00
c iw
2.00
1.00
8 16
6B - SWM-6 Reach to POA 6
Hyd. No. 17 — 2 Year
24
Hyd No. 17 — Hyd No. 13
Wednesday, 06 / 3 12015
= 2.810 cfs
= 12.70 hrs
= 53,277 cuft
= Triangular
= 3.7 %
= 0.0 ft
= 0.0 ft
= 1.333
= 0.2168
32 40 48 56 64
Q (cfs)
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
72
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DB 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 17
66 - SWM-6 Reach to POA 6
Hydrograph type
= Reach
Peak discharge
= 24.03 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.27 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 112,508 cuft
Inflow hyd. No.
= 13 - SWM-6 Routed
Section type
= Triangular
Reach length
= 2792.0 ft
Channel slope
= 3.7 %
Manning's n
= 0.030
Bottom width
= 0.0 ft
Side slope
= 2.0:1
Max. depth
= 0.0 ft
Rating curve x
= 4.752
Rating curve m
= 1.333
Ave. velocity
= 7.36 ft/s
Routing coeff.
= 0.3484
Modified Att-Kin routing method used
Q (cfs)
28.00 -
24.00
20.00
16.00
12.00
m
4.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 17
6B - SWM-6 Reach to POA 6
Hyd. No. 17 — 10 Year
6 8 10
Hyd No. 13
12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Q(Cfa)
28.00
24.00
20.00
16.00
12.00
�11
- M
� 0.00
26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3 Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 17
6B - SWM-6 Reach to POA 6
Hydrograph type
= Reach
Peak discharge
= 58.14 cfs
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.23 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 237,047 cuft
Inflow hyd. No.
= 13 - SWM-6 Routed
Section type
= Triangular
Reach length
= 2792.0 ft
Channel slope
= 3.7 %
Manning's n
= 0.030
Bottom width
= 0.0 ft
Side slope
= 2.0:1
Max. depth
= 0.0 ft
Rating curve x
= 4.752
Rating curve m
= 1.333
Ave. velocity
= 9.02 ft/s
Routing coeff.
= 0.4107
Modifled Att-Kin routing method used.
Q (ofs)
70.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00 '
0 2 4
Hyd No. 17
6B - SWM-6 Reach to POA 6
Hyd. No. 17 —100 Year
6 8 10
Hyd No. 13
12 14 16
Q (Cfs)
70.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
— . 0.00
18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Hyd. No. 18
6C - SWM-7 Reach to POA 6
Hydrograph type
= Reach
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Inflow hyd. No.
= 14 - SWM-7 Routed
Section type
Reach length
= 930.0 ft
Channel slope
Manning's n
= 0.030
Bottom width
Side slope
= 2.0:1
Max. depth
Rating curve x
= 4.471
Rating curve m
Ave. velocity
= 2.37 ft/s
Routing coeff.
Modified Aft -Kin routing method used.
12 18 24 30 36 42
Hyd No. 14
Wednesday, 0613 / 2015
= 0.351 cfs
= 15.77 hrs
= 27,547 cuft
= Triangular
= 3.2 %
= 0.0 ft
= 0.0 ft
= 1.333
= 0.3382
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 31392014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Hyd. No. 18
6C - SWM-7 Reach to POA 6
Hydrograph type
= Reach
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Inflow hyd. No.
= 14 - SWM-7 Routed
Section type
Reach length
930.0 ft
Channel slope
Manning's n
= 0.030
Bottom width
Side slope
= 2.0:1
Max. depth
Rating curve x
= 4.471
Rating curve m
Ave. velocity
= 2.58 ft/s
Routing coeff.
Modified Att-Kin routing method used.
. ••
0.50
a�a�i ri��►�e>_a�a�.
s aaaaaaaa�aaa���aaaaaaaa�aaaaaaae�aaaaaaa���.
aaaaaaaa�a�' aar_�a��aaaaa��aaaaaaaa��
� � a�� o>_aaaaaaa�aaaaaaaa�aaaa��a��
a�a� �a�aaaa�aaaaaaaa�aaaaaaa��eaaaa��
aaaaess>. aaaa� � s� aaaaaaaa� aaaaaaaa� aaaaaaaa� aa� ss� �
0 6 12
Hyd No. 18
18 24 30
Hyd No. 14
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
= 0.493 cfs
= 17.10 hrs
= 55,569 cuft
= Triangular
= 3.2 %
= 0.0 ft
= 0.0 ft
= 1.333
= 0.3628
Q (cfs)
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
230
).25
).20
his
).10
0.05
0.00
36 42 48 54 60 66 72
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 18
6C - SWM-7 Reach to POA 6
Hydrograph type
= Reach
Peak discharge
= 3.548 cfs
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.80 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 113,073 cuft
Inflow hyd. No.
= 14 - SWM-7 Routed
Section type
= Triangular
Reach length
= 930.0 ft
Channel slope
= 3.2 %
Manning's n
= 0.030
Bottom width
= 0.0 ft
Side slope
= 2.0:1
Max. depth
= 0.0 ft
Rating curve x
= 4.471
Rating curve m
= 1.333
Ave. velocity
= 4.23 ft/s
Routing coeff.
= 0.5337
Modred Aft -Kin routing method used
Q (cfs)
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
0 8
Hyd No. 18
6C - SWM-7 Reach to POA 6
Hyd. No. 18 —100 Year
16 24 32
— Hyd No. 14
40 48 56 64 72
Q (cfs)
4.00
3.00
2.00
--k- 0.00
80
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydreflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Tuesday, 06 / 2 / 2015
Hyd. No. 8
Post DA-6U
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 69.46 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.13 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 286,900 cuft
Drainage area
= 96.030 ac
Curve number
= 64"
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 21.00 min
Total precip.
= 3.70 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
*Composite (Area/CN) = [(78.550 x 80) + (1.660x98) + (4.030 x 74) + (10.490 x 70)) / 96.030
Q (Cfs)
70.00 -
40.00
cII
20.00
10.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 8
6 8
Post DA-6U
Hyd. No. 8 — 2 Year
Q (cfs)
70.00
M
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3 Tuesday, 06 / 2 / 2015
Hyd. No. 8
Post DA-6U
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 195.37 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.13 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 703,502 cuft
Drainage area
= 96.030 ac
Curve number
= 64"
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 21.00 min
Total precip.
= 5.60 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
" Composite (Area/CN) = [(76.550 x 60) + (1.660 x 98) + (4.030 x 74) + (10.490 x 70)[ / 96.030
Q (cfs)
210.00
180.00
150.00
120.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 8
Post DA-6U
Hyd. No. 8 --10 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16
Q(Cfs)
210.00
180.00
150.00
120.00
•r 1
30.00
' 0.00
18 20 22 24 26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
! HydreBow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3 Wednesday, 061312015
Hyd. No. 8
Post DA-6U
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 478.95 cfs
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.10 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 1,659,292 cuft
Drainage area
= 96.030 ac
Curve number
= 64'
Basin Slope
= 0.0 %
Hydraulic length
= Oft
Tc method
= User
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 21.00 min
Total precip.
= 9.10 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Composite (Area/CN) = [(76.550 x 60) + (1.660 x 98) + (4.030 x 74) + (10.490 x 70)] 196.030
Q (cfs)
490.00
420.00
350.00
280.00
210.00
140.00
0.00 '
0 2 4
Hyd No. 8
Post DA-6U
Hyd. No. 8 --100 Year
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Q (cfs)
490.00
420.00
350.00
280.00
210.00
140.00
70.00
—�- 0.00
26
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension fdrAutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Tuesday, 06 / 2 / 2015
Hyd. No. 23
Combined 6
Hydrograph type
= Combine
Peak discharge
= 76.26 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.13 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 402,357 cuft
Inflow hyds.
= 8, 11, 16, 17,18
Contrib. drain. area
= 101.020 ac
Q (cfs)
80.00
70.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 23
Combined 6
Hyd. No. 23 -- 2 Year
Q (cfs)
80.00
70.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
0 1I
10.00
0.00
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
— Hyd No. 8 —Hyd No. 11 —Hyd No. 16 Time (hrs)
— Hyd No. 17 — Hyd No. 18
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3
Tuesday, 06 / 2 / 2015
Hyd. No. 23
Combined 6
Hydrograph type
= Combine
Peak discharge
= 224.22 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.13 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 992,868 cuft
Inflow hyds.
= 8, 11, 16, 17, 18
Contrib. drain. area
= 101.020 ac
Q (cfs)
240.00
210.00
180.00
150.00
120.00
30.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 23
Combined 6
Hyd. No. 23 —10 Year
Q (cfs)
240.00
210.00
180.00
150.00
120.00
.r l
t 11
0.00
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
— Hyd No. 8 —Hyd Na. 11 —Hyd No. 16 Time (hrs)
Hyd No. 17 — Hyd No. 18
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Wednesday, 06 / 3 / 2015
Hyd. No. 23
Combined 6
Hydrograph type
= Combine
Peak discharge
= 570.12 cfs
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.13 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 2,310,925 cuft
Inflow hyds.
= 8, 11, 16, 17, 18
Contrib. drain. area
= 101.020 ac
Q (Cfs)
640.00
560.00
480.00
400.00
320.00
240.00
160.00
0.00
0 2 4
Hyd No. 23
Combined 6
Hyd. No. 23 --100 Year
Q (Cfs)
640.00
480.00
400.00
320.00
240.00
160.00
0.00
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
— Hyd No. 8 —Hyd No. 11 —Hyd No. 16 Time (hrs)
Hyd No. 17 — Hyd No. 18
BMP CALCULATIONS
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
RMP 3
Worksheet 1
Pagel of 3
STEP I Determine the applicable area (A) and the post -developed impervious cover
(1Po,)•
Applicable area (A)* = 12 • q0 acres
Post -development impervious cover:
structures = 0.51 acres
al e(.J t wk1$ DwWagft= 0, 4 S acres
roadway = O • a a acres
other:
,=-acres
acres
Total = ) acres
4= = (total post -development impervious cover _ A) X 100 = 14.73 d/
The area subject to the criteria may vary from locality to locality. Therefore,
consult the locality for proper determination of this value.
STEP I Determine the average land cover condition (lwaursned) Qr the eadsting
impervious cover (I�iseog).
Average land cover condition (Tµa e�;
If the locality has determined land cover conditions for individual watersheds within its
jurisdiction, use the watershed specific value determined by the locality as I,.t..
k..w = r1a
Otherwise, use the Chesapeake Bay default value:
1.ret.d = 16%
5D-5
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS, ` APPENDIX SD
Worksheet 1
Page 2 of 3
mail-AIMIN&VA. • a 1
Determine the existing impervious cover of the development site if present.
Existing impervious cover:
other:
structures = acres
parking lot = O acres
roadway = acres
acres
acres
Total = acres
1 _(total existing impervious cover A*) x 100 = O "/�
* The area should be the same as used in STEP 1.
STEP 3 Determine the appropriate development situation.
The site information determined in STEP 1 and STEP 2 provide enough information to
determine the appropriate development situation under which the performance criteria will apply.
Check (✓) the appropriate development situation as follows:
Situation 1: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (I.....d is less than or eq , 1 to the average land cover condition
(Iw.s and the proposed improvements will create a total percent
impervious cover (J ,•) which is le than hhan or equal to the average land
cover condition
IP-t % 5 lwm.b d %
M
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 3D
Worksheet l
Page 3 of 3
JSituation 2: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (I,,s. is less than or equal to the average land cover condition
(1,� and the proposed improvements will create a total percent
impervious cover (IP.) which is greater than the average land cover
condition (I., hd).
IWd5dng O �n 5 watershed 16 %; and
T 14. 13 %i itatenhe, 1L % j*s11 n«4 to tctMt
Situation 3: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (IIX� is greater h n the average land cover condition (Iw.,...he).
existing U �n > 7iratenhed %
Situation 4: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (1.;=d is served by an existing stormwater management BMP(s)
that addresses water n taL lity.
If the proposed development meets the criteria for development Situation 1, than the low
density development is considered to be the BMP and no pollutant removal is required.
The calculation procedure for Situation 1 stops here. If the proposed development meets
the criteria for development Situations 2, 3, or 4, then proceed to STEP 4 on the
appropriate worksheet.
5D-7
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER EQUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
ED
Worksheet 2 : Situation 2
Page I of 4
Summary of Situation 2 criteria: from calculation procedure STEP I thru STEP 3, Worksheet 1:
Applicable area (A)* = 11•110 acres
Ipns< = (total post -development impervious cover = A) x 100 = 14.13 e/n
]wriershed = NIA d/n or 'watershed = 16%
Imsting = (total existing impervious cover _ A*) x 100 = 1 0 °/n
I.isting C % S 'watershed IL %; and
IP-t 14.13 °/n > Iwatenhea' 1 6 % S j 11 " t r q.}
STEPS Determine the relative pre -development pollutant load (L.J.
Lp-(watershed) _ [0.05 + (0.009 x I„ ] x A x 218 (Equation 5-16)
where: 1,*(w.a,,,,,h4 = relative pre -development total phosphorous load (pounds per year)
ivaurshed = average land cover condition for specific watershed or locality nr
the Chesapeake Bay default value of 16% (percent expressed in
whole numbers)
A = applicable area (acres)
Lpre(wa4rshed> = [0.05 + (0.009 x "0, a Ix 12 -1 x 2.28
= S.11 pounds per year
5D-9
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY: CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Worksheet 2 : Situation 2
Page 2 of 4
STEP 5 Determine the relative post -development pollutant load (L.J.
Lpost = [0.05 + (0.009 x 4j] x A x 2.29 (Equation 5-21)
where: Lpwt = relative post -development total phosphorous load (pounds per
T yam)
'po:a = post -development percent impervious cover (percent expressed in
whole numbers)
A = applicable area (acres)
Lpo t = [0.05 + (0.009 x !! 4 )] x 11, A x 2.28
= S • 1l pounds per year
STET' S Determine the relative pollutant removal requirement (RR).
RR = Lp., - Lp.(av b hcd)
s.3-v fool
S•'►1
RR = sib-
=- 0.3`I pounds per year
STEPS Identify best management practice (BMP) for the site.
1. Determine the required pollutant removal efficiency for the site:
EFF = (RR—* Lp.) x 100 (Equation 5-22)
where: EFF = required pollutant removal efficiency (percent expressed in whole
numbers)
RR = pollutant removal requirement (pounds per year)
Lpox = relative post -development total phosphorous load (pounds per
year)
EFF=(DADS -5•-11 )x100
11. -L%
5D-10
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Worksheet 2 Situation 2
Page 3 of 4
2. Select BMP(s) from Table 5-Wand locate on the site:
BMP1:_E1-14-n led Loy WQd ) wl 4hus.,h'c b.—t l
3. Determine the pollutant load entering the proposed BMP(s):
LBmp _ [0.05 + (0.009 x IBw)] x A x 2.28 (Equation 5-23)
where: LBw = relative post -development total phosphorous load entering
proposed BMP (pounds per year)
IBhe = post -development percent impervious cover ofBMP drainage area
(percent expressed in whole numbers)
A = drainage area of proposed BMP (acres)
L33mp1 = [0.05 + (0.009 x 14.1 i )] x IZ . °) x 2.28
s S • 11 pounds per year
LBw _ [0.05 + (0.009 x )] x x 2.28
pounds per year
LBw3 = [0.05 + (0.009 x )] x x 2.28
= pounds per year
5D-11
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS ; APPENDIX 5D .
Worksheet 2 • Situation 2
Page 4 of 4
4. Calculate the pollutant load removed by the proposed BMP(s):
Lremoved — EffBW x LBeda
(Equation 5-24)
where: L� w = Post -development pollutant load removed by proposed BAP
(pounds per year)
EfiB w = pollutant removal efficiency of BAP (expressed in decimal form)
LBw = relative post -development total phosphorous load entering
proposed BMP (pounds per year)
Lrem0vedMNT1 = O . GS x S ' = 34- pounds per year
LremavedBMP2 = x = pounds per year
LremovedBW3 = - - — " = pounds per year
5. Calculate the total pollutant load removed by the BMP(s):
Lmmovemotal = Lremove"hej + Lmmavedfamp2 + Lremovemjmn + • • • (Equation 5-25)
where: Lremoved/mt. =
total pollutant load removed by proposed BAPS
L.. d/BWl =
pollutant load removed by proposed BMP No, 1
LremeveASMP2 =
pollutant load removed by proposed BAP No. 2
L..MM =
pollutant load removed by proposed BAP No. 3
Lremoved/total — S 4 + N 1 p + AA
3• pounds per year
6. Verify compliance:
LremovednoW 2 RR
1.%A% 2:- ° -34
5D-12
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY' CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Worksheet 1 %^Q
Page 1 of 3
STEP 1 Determine the applicable area (A) and the post -developed impervious cover
Up").
Applicable area (A)* = Il 34 acres
Post -development impervious cover:
structures = 9AV acres
driva«•vas pit =0•-lt acres
other:
roadway = 1.1 L acres
acres
acres
Total = 1.33 acres
Imo, = (total post -development impervious cover - A) X 100 = U. ( S
The area subject to the criteria may vary from locality to locality. Therefore,
consult the locality for proper determination of this value.
STEP 2 Determine the average land cover condition (J,.,rshed) m: the existing
impervious cover (I).
Aver = land rover condition (J.,am):
If the locality has determined land cover conditions for individual watersheds within its
jurisdiction, use the watershed specific value determined by the locality as'v Wnbed.
'w .m ' = N to
Otherwise, use the Chesapeake Bay default value:
I.tushed =16%
5D-5
PERFORMANCE -BASED 'WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Worksheet 1
Page 2 of 3
Determine the existing impervious cover of the development site if present.
Existing impervious cover:
structures = acres
parking lot =---a—acres
roadway = acres
other:
acres
acres
Total = nacres
"- = (total existing impervious cover = A*) x 100 = O %,
The area should be the same as used in STEP 1.
STEPS Determine the appropriate development situation.
The site information determined in STEP 1 and STEP 2 provide enough information to
determine the appropriate development situation under which the performance criteria will apply.
Check (✓) the appropriate development situation as follows:
Situation 1: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
covers is less than or equal to the average land cover condition
(I.�h,d) and the proposed improvements will create a total percent
impervious cover (Ipj which is less than or equal to the average land
cover condition
I ad % S 'watershed %
M
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX SD
Worksheet 1
Page 3 of
'! Situation 2: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (Is;ndis less than or equal to the average land cover condition
(I..h j and the proposed improvements will create a total percent
impervious cover ( ..) which is greater than the average land cover
condition (IK,a,p .
Iexhting 0 % s I wwe hed I #A ; and
IPA 1%•1L din>4wershed * o
Situation 3: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (I�,;, is gm= than the average land cover condition
Ie3j5dog %> watershed %
Situation 4: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (ls,;,g) is served by an existing stormwater management BMP(s)
that addresses water quality.
If the proposed development meets the criteria for development Situation 1, than the low
density development is considered to be the BMP and no pollutant removal is required.
The calculation procedure for Situation 1 stops here. If the proposed development meets
the criteria for development Situations 2, 3, or 4, then proceed to STEP 4 on the
appropriate Worksheet.
5D-7
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Worksheet 2 • Sitna ion 2
Page I of 4
Summary of Situation 2 criteria: from calculation procedure STEP thru STEP 3 Worksheet 1:
Applicable area (A)* = 11Aj acres
IP°,t = (total post -development impervious cover _ A) x 100
T= �, • 1 S %,
hnrershed —NIA % or IH,a,.d =16%
(total existing impervious cover _ A*) x 100 = %
O o 1. o
In;,d,g 1 %; and
IPMt 1 .1i ° > Iw,h wed_ I is %
STEP Determine the relative pre -development pollutant load (LP.).
LPR(..atersheo = [0.05 + (0.009 x I.,.,hd)] x A x 218 (Equation 5-16)
where: Lpa., = relative pre -development total phosphorous load (pounds per year)
Im=,h,d average land cover condition for specific watershed or locality Qr
the Chesapeake Bay default value of 16%° (percent expressed in
whole numbers)
A = applicable area (acres)
Lp,,Cw,u„h,O = [0.05 + (0.009 x AV__)] )] x 11.04 x 2.28
= 5 • `l- pounds per year
5D-9
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Worksheet 2 : Situation 2
Page 2 of 4
STEP S Determine the relative post -development pollutant load (Lpo,).
LPOM _ [0.05 + (0.009 x 4, j] x A x 2.28 (Equation 5-21)
where: Lpoa = relative post -development total phosphorous load (pounds per
year)
Ip„t = post -development percent impervious cover (percent expressed in
whole numbers)
A = applicable area (acres)
Lp.t _ [0.05 + (0.009 x l4. IT )] x lot x 2.28
= (OAS pounds per year
STEP ( Determine the relative pollutant removal requirement (RR).
RR = Lp,n - Lp,�(w„4
RR = 6.LS - S.to&
= Q .S? pounds per year
STEPS Identify best management practice (BMP) for the site.
1. Determine the required pollutant removal efficiency for the site:
EFF = (RR+ Lp..) x 100 (Equation 5-22)
where: EFF required pollutant removal efficiency (percent expressed in whole
numbers)
RR = pollutant removal requirement (pounds per year)
Lp.t = relative post -development total phosphorous load (pounds per
year)
EFF = ( 0'6 S — (s.2i ) x 100
a (0-4 %
5D-10
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 51)
Wark h 2 - Situation 2
Page 3 of 4
2. Select BMP(s) from Table 5-Vand locate on the site:
BMP1: E-4ktAa(a ()e4c.-4Ifn (_4)c%+4v) wl 1�4��it `e,
f urr
I-iur-FA
3. Determine the pollutant load entering the proposed BMP(s):
L8w _ [0.05 + (0.009 x IBA,)] x A x 2.28 (Equation 5-23)
where: Law = relative post -development total phosphorous load entering
proposed BMP (pounds per year)
Iaw = post -development percent impervious cover of BNT drainage area
(percent expressed in whole numbers)
A = drainage area of proposed BMP (acres)
LBmp, _ [0.05 + (0.009 x 114S )] x 104 x 2.28
- `js pounds per year
LBm[p2 = [0.05 + (0.009 x )] x x 2.28
pounds per year
LBO _ [0.05 + (0.009 x )] x x 2.28
pounds per year
46mil
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX SD
Workcheet 2 : Situation 2 ��
Page 4 of 4 S
4. Calculate the pollutant load removed by the proposed BMP(s):
Lmmmed — Ef a. % LBn2
(Equation 5-24)
where: L,em� = Post -development pollutant load removed by proposed BMP
(pounds per year)
Effa 2 = pollutant removal efficiency of BMP (expressed in decimal form)
Law = relative post -development total phosphorous load entering
proposed BMP (pounds per year)
L�medBNP1 = 0 .bS x GAS = 4.01e pounds per year
LremmedBMP2 = X = pounds per year
LmmowdMW3 = " = pounds per year
5. Calculate the total pollutant load removed by the BMP(s):
Ln ditm — L..dBMP, + L,eo,mR"m + Lre .&amin + ... (Equation 5-25)
where: Lre .dimta =
total pollutant load removed by proposed BMPs
L=110&BW1=
pollutant load removed by proposed BMP No. 1
L.d,BMn =
pollutant load removed by proposed BW No. 2
L....&Brdrs =
pollutant load removed by proposed BNIP No. 3
Lrcmovedlmtal — — 4-0I. + Vila,Vila,... + Vila +
= L4. C V pounds per year
6. Verify compliance:
L „ 1 RR
y,oa z 0.5*7
5D-12
F
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 51)
STEP I Determine the applicable area (A) and the post -developed impervious cover
(4J'
Applicable area (A)* = 7- S1 acres
Post -development impervious cover:
structures = 0' ly acres
d fi%f qt w yf fbt = Q20 acres
roadway = C '_acres
other:
_= -acres
acres
Total = q • 4 O acres
Ip,,, = (total post -development impervious cover - A) x 100 =l S N N off"
The area subject to the criteria may vary from locality to locality. Therefore,
consult the locality for proper determination of this value.
STEP_7. Determine the average land cover condition (I,,,,,,,bJ ht the eidsting
impervious cover (Iq;,h,J.
Average land rover condition (I_=.h d):
If the locality has determined land cover conditions for individual watersheds within its
jurisdiction, use the watershed specific value determined by the locality as Imo,,,, ti d.
Iwae ..d = N to %
Otherwise, use the Chesapeake Bay default value:
Ip t, h,d =16%
5D-5
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Worksheet t
Page 2 of 3
Determine the existing impervious cover of the development site if present.
Existing impervious cover:
other:
structures = acres
parking lot = acres
roadway = 0 acres
- acres
.=—acres
Total = acres
1.,,j,„ = (total existing impervious cover—. A*) x 100 = D %
* The area should be the same as used in STEP 1.
STEPS Determine the appropriate development situation.
The site information determined in STEP 1 and STEP 2 provide enough information to
determine the appropriate development situation under which the performance criteria will apply.
Check (✓) the appropriate development situation as follows:
Situation 1: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (I.„d is less than or equal to the average land cover condition
and the proposed improvements will create a total percent
impervious cover (W which is less than or equal to the average land
cover condition
IP-t % 5 I.raunnea %
mo
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Worksheet i
Page 3 of 3
Situation 2: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (1esbng) is less than or equal to the average land cover condition
(1,4 ahad) and the proposed improvements will create a total percent
impervious cover (IP.) which is Preater than the average land cover
condition \'vratashd.
Im:eng O % < watershed 11. %; and
Ipost NS.44 % > watershed I t. % S } 't I n a t d 4� 4 r t&J
Situation 3: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (I.isti,,d is greater than the average land cover condition (I...h j.
0 T existing �0 %> watershed
Situation 4: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (IC1,;sd g) is served by an existing stormwater management BMP(s)
that addresses water .ua� lam.
If the proposed development meets the criteria for development Situation 1, than the low
density development is considered to be the BMP and no pollutant removal is required.
The calculation procedure for Situation 1 stops here. If the proposed development meets
the criteria for development Situations 2, 3, or 4, then proceed to STEP 4 on the
appropriate worksheet.
5D-7
PERFORMANCF,BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Qnrs
Worksheet 2 • Situation 2
Page 1 of 4
Summary of Situation 2 criteria: from calculation procedure STEP1 thru STEPS, Worksheet 1:
Applicable area (A)* = 2 M acres
TIpwt = (total post -development impervious cover - A) x 100 = _ 1 S •y 9
watershed = NIP e/n or lashed =16%
Ie ,,j.g = (total existing impervious cover + A*) x 100 = O d/
IQMog O % s watershed 16 %- and
IPO$t IS-44 %>Iwatershed III 0%
STEP Determine the relative pre -development pollutant load (L..).
LPre(w t,,w _ [0.05 + (0.009 x atershea)] x A x 2.28 (Equation 5-16)
where: LPre(watershed) = relative pre -development total phosphorous load (pounds per year)
Twa e.ahw = average land cover condition for specific watershed or locality er
the Chesapeake Bay default value of 16% (percent expressed in
whole numbers)
A = applicable area (acres)
LP"(watershed) _ [0.05 + (0.009 x I (I )] x I M x 2.28
1. IT pounds per year
5D-9
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Worksheet 2 : Situation 2
Page 2 of 4
STEPS Determine the relative post -development pollutant load (L.J.
Lpwt _ [0.05 + (0.009 x 4, j] x A x 2.28 (Equation 5-21)
where: Lp. = relative post -development total phosphorous load (pounds per
year)
IP.,, = post -development percent impervious cover (percent expressed in
whole numbers)
A = applicable area (acres)
Lp., _ [0.05 + (0.009 x IS•44 )] x Vrl x 2.28
1.11 pounds per year
STEP 6 Determine the relative pollutant removal requirement (RR).
RR = LpW - Lpm(waw al ed)
RR = 1.17- - ►.IS
- 0.0 pounds per year
STEP Z Identify best management practice (BMP) for the site.
1. Determine the required pollutant removal efficiency for the site:
EFT = (RR-, Lp,,) x 100 (Equation 5-22)
where: EFF = required pollutant removal efficiency (percent expressed in whole
numbers)
RR = pollutant removal requirement (pounds per year)
Lpw = relative post -development total phosphorous load (pounds per
year)
EFF = ( 0 • `5 - I'll, ) x 100
S6.04 o,,,
5D-10
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALM CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
WorkshePSituation 2
Page 3 of 4
2. Select BN2(s) from Table 5-Wand locate on the site:
ol�
BMPI: �iart�aniiM 1 $-%. iwnQerv'oJ o.rtM
1:1"T17
3. Determine the pollutant load entering the proposed BNQ(s):
LB,p _ [0.05 + (0.009 x I..)] x A x 2.28 (Equation 5-23)
where: L,B,B. = relative post -development total phosphorous load entering
proposed BMP (pounds per year)
IBw = post -development percent impervious cover of BMP drainage area
(percent expressed in whole numbers)
A = drainage area of proposed BMP (acres)
[0.05 + (0.009 x IS 44 ] x 2.5.1 x 2.28
I.11 pounds per year
LBw2 = [0.05 + (0.009 x )] x x 2.28
pounds per year
L., ,, = [0.05 + (0.009 x )] x x 2.28
pounds per year
5D-11
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX SD
Worksh et 2 • Situation 2
Page 4 of 4
4. Calculate the pollutant load removed by the proposed BAP(s):
Lmmmed = Effahe x LBW
(Equation 5-24)
where: L� = Post -development pollutant load removed by proposed BMP
(pounds per year)
Efla w = pollutant removal efficiency of BMP (expressed in decimal form)
LBja = relative post -development total phosphorous load entering
proposed BMP (pounds per year)
LremovedBMP1 = O . (OS x 1.14 = O '1 j pounds per year
LremevedBW2 — x = pounds per year
LmmovedBMe3 = — x = pounds per year
5. Calculate the total pollutant load removed by the BAP(s):
Lremmed/mml = Lrom.nNe1 + L...dahm + Lremovedaw3 + • • . (Equation 5-25)
where: L..ditul =
total pollutant load removed by proposed BAPs
Lre„l =
pollutant load removed by proposed BAP No, 1
L..V1dBMs2 =
pollutant load removed by proposed BAP No. 2
Leo �aB3 =
pollutant load removed by proposed BAP No. 3
LRmortanow = O • 3 + I,►1 0, + my, +...
0' 1 I _ pounds per year
6. Verify compliance:
Lre t RR
0.13 z —o.og
5D-12
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
aMP
Wor_ ksheet 1
Page 1 of 3
STEP 1 //Determine the applicable area (A) and the post -developed impervious cover
`1pon)•
Applicable area (A)* = 1 I . S I acres
Post -development impervious cover:
structures = �__-�3acres
drvI.+m,)i}13 het = C'�S acres
v.4L%W
roadway = ! • 4 8 acres
other:
acres
acres
Total = L 0 C acres
Ip„t = (total post -development impervious cover _ A) x 100 =
* The area subject to the criteria may vary from locality to locality. Therefore,
consult the locality for proper determination of this value.
STEPS Determine the average land cover condition (Ih� nr the existing
impervious cover (Inamg)-
Aver ge land cover condition G,,, av:
If the locality has determined land cover conditions for individual watersheds within its
jurisdiction, use the watershed specific value determined by the locality as )R,.
I.ftshed = N to %
Otherwise, use the Chesapeake Bay default value:
I,vatenhed = 16%
5D-5
PERFORMANCE -BASED RATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Worksheet 1
Page 2 of 3
11 111:1\II 1 :1
Determine the existing impervious cover of the development site if present.
Existing impervious cover:
structures = acres
parking lot = acres
roadway =--.2-acres
other:
acres
acres
Total = G acres
I _(total existing impervious cover = A*) X 100 = C %
The area should be the same as used in STEP 1.
STEP 3 Determine the appropriate development situation.
The site information determined in STEP 1 and STEP 2 provide enough information to
determine the appropriate development situation under which the performance criteria will apply
Check (✓) the appropriate development situation as follows:
Situation 1: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
covert is less than or equal to the average land cover condition
(I V, and the proposed improvements will create a total percent
impervious cover (W which is less than or equal to the average land
cover condition (I,,.t h d).
77
past � S 'watershed 0 �"
-Tirr
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX SD
Worksheet 1
Page 3 of 3
Situation 2: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (ICX1,,id is less han or equal o the average land cover condition
(Iµ ,.bed) and the proposed improvements will create a total percent
impervious cover &.) which is greater than the average land cover
condition (Iwa,.,hea).
Iexisting 0 % S Iwatmhed 1(o %; and
Iport 95.10o >'watershed 'V % Sell nlwl" kClqk
Situation 3: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (1..5t J is greater than the average land cover condition (I.�.
I-bmg % > `wlmbld %
Situation 4: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (I.,.is&d is served by an existing stormwater management BMP(s)
that addresses water q �al� 14.
If the proposed development meets the criteria for development Situation 1, than the low
density development is considered to be the BMP and no pollutant removal is required.
The calculation procedure for Situation 1 stops here. If the proposed development meets
the criteria for development Situations 2, 3, or 4, then proceed to STEP 4 on the
appropriate worksheet.
SD-7
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
M( b
Worksheet 2, Si ration
Page 1 of 4
Summary of Situation 2 criteria: from calculation procedure STEP 1 thru STEP 3, Worksheet 1:
Applicable area (A)* = IL S9 acres
Ip"t = (total post -development impervious cover—, A) x 100 = 9.63 %,
= rlp % or I.,., =16%
I.s,g = (total existing impervious cover _ A*) x 100 = 0 %
Ini,fl,g O % s Iwatersnm 6 %; and
IP., 003 u >I..ar���a 16
STEP Determine the relative pre -development pollutant load (Lp j.
Lpra(watushed) _ [0.05 + (0.009 x Iw,t y j] x A x 2.28 (Equation 5-16)
where: Lr„(a,,,,.) = relative pre -development total phosphorous load (pounds per year)
average land cover condition for specific watershed or locality Qr
the Chesapeake Bay default value of 16% (percent expressed in
whole numbers)
A = applicable area (acres)
LPre(w„e„hed) _ [0.05 + (0.009 x I (e )] x h .S1 x 2.28
= 5 - 1 3 pounds per year
5D-9
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Worksheet 2 : Situation 2
Page 2 of 4
STEP S Determine the relative post -development pollutant load (Lp,).
Lp„t = [0.05 + (0.009 x IpoJ] x A x 2.28 (Equation 5-21)
where: Lpo. = relative post -development total phosphorous load (pounds per
yam)
Ip�,t = post -development percent impervious cover (percent expressed in
whole numbers)
A = applicable area (acres)
LpWt = [0.05 + (0.009 x A -9 )] x 1, g x 2.28
= 3 .31 pounds per year
STEP 6 Determine the relative pollutant removal requirement (RR).
RR = Lp.t — Lpre(wa=1.d)
RR l'
- I.l L pounds per year
STEPS Identify best management practice (BMP) for the site.
1. Determine the required pollutant removal efficiency for the site:
EFF = ( RR + Lj,= ) x 100 (Equation 5-22)
where: EFF = required pollutant removal efficiency (percent expressed in whole
numbers)
RR = pollutant removal requirement (pounds per year)
Lp= = relative post -development total phosphorous load (pounds per
year)
EFF = ( I -I (A - 1*31 ) x 100
SD-10
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Worksheet 2 -Situation 2
Page 3 of 4
2. Select BNT(s) from Table 5-Wand locate on the site:
BMP1: JEr4sn A A ()*fr,fi.•, (4y. V GLV) w1 wYw
BMP
3. Determine the pollutant load entering the proposed BMP(s):
LB,,. p = [0.05 + (0.009 x IBw)] x A x 2.28 (Equation 5-23)
where: LBhe = relative post -development total phosphorous load entering
proposed BNIP (pounds per year)
IBw = post -development percent impervious cover of BMP drainage area
(percent expressed in whole numbers)
A = drainage area of proposed BMP (acres)
LB1 = [0.05 + (0.009 x E -`S )] x 11 • S1 x 228
pounds per year
LB 2 = [0.05 + (0.009 x )] x x 2.28
pounds per year
LBMn _ [0.05 + (0.009 x )] x x 2.28
pounds per year
5D-11
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS . APPENDIX 5D'
Workshee.t 2 : Situation 2
Page 4 of 4
4. Calculate the pollutant load removed by the proposed BMP(s):
Lre Wed = Eff,, x LB.
(Equation 5-24)
where: L.Oved = Post -development pollutant load removed by proposed BAD
(pounds per year)
EffBw = pollutant removal efficiency of BAD (expressed in decimal form)
LBI a = relative post -development total phosphorous load entering
proposed BMP (pounds per year)
Lremoved/BMPl
0• Ut
Lien e&BMP2 =
Lre Gve"W3 =
x 3.32 — Z - 1 9 pounds per year
x = pounds per year
x = pounds per year
5. Calculate the total pollutant load removed by the BMP(s):
L�,,,ed/W21 = L + L BO + L.o�&sw3 +. . - (Equation 5-25)
where: L.o�ew =
total pollutant load removed by proposed BMPs
pollutant load removed by proposed BMP No. 1
Lie oB =
pollutant load removed by proposed BMP No. 2
L..�da W3 =
pollutant load removed by proposed BMP No. 3
L�uvedittA = Z -tot + 1. 1A + h +. ..
Z • 15 pounds per year
6. Verify compliance:
L�.,.jt,,tw t RR
I tot z - 1.14.
5D-12
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Workcheet i
Pagel of 3
Determine the applicable area (A) and the post -developed impervious cover
(1p.).
Applicable area (A)* = 5.1*1 acres
Post -development impervious cover:
structures =acres
4" "1(PaA4a6--lot = 0.11 acres
4J►\1d
other:
roadway = O.4 C acres
acres
acres
Total = 1 • __Iacres
4m, = (total post -development impervious cover - A) x 100 = 1' At.
* The area subject to the criteria may vary from locality to locality. Therefore,
consult the locality for proper determination of this value.
STEP 2 Determine the average land cover condition (I,,..ra d .gr the existing
impervious cover (1.,.g).
Average land cover cnnditinn fr:
If the locality has determined land cover conditions for individual watersheds within its
jurisdiction, use the watershed specific value determined by the locality as Ia,,.
Iwatershea — p °
Otherwise, use the Chesapeake Bay default value:
IWW.h a =16%
5D-5
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 51)
Wnrksheet 1
Page 2 of 3
Determine the existing impervious cover of the development site if present.
Existing impervious cover:
other:
structures = acres
parking lot = acres
roadway = ! acres
acres
acres
Total — D acres
I=bft = (total existing impervious cover— A*) X 100 = 0 %
* The area should be the same as used in STEP 1.
STEP 3 Determine the appropriate development situation.
The site information determined in STEP 1 and STEP 2 provide enough information to
determine the appropriate development situation under which the performance criteria will apply.
Check (✓) the appropriate development situation as follows:
Situation 1: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (I.,.d is less than or equal to the average land cover condition
(Ia, d) and the proposed improvements will create a total percent
impervious cover (W which is less than or equal to the average land
cover condition
Ipost % 5 L.U.I d %
61kri
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 51)
Worksheet 1
Page 3 of 3
Situation 2: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (1,.i,,. J is less than or aQual to the average land cover condition
(I,,te,,Ij and the proposed improvements will create a total percent
impervious cover (lie) which is greater than the average land cover
condition (I.,h d).
Ie M.g 0 % 5 Iwatenhed 1 V %; and
Ipost 10 • A V % > 'watershed i, k, off^
Situation 3: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (Ie,em� is ;eater than the average land cover condition
>
0 0
existing ^ watershetl ^
Situation 4: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (Ie,,td is served by an existing stormwater management BMP(s)
that addresses water quality,
If the proposed development meets the criteria for development Situation 1, than the low
density development is considered to be the BMP and no pollutant removal is required.
The calculation procedure for Situation 1 stops here. If the proposed development meets
the criteria for development Situations 2, 3, or 4, then proceed to S_TEP4 on the
appropriate worksheet.
WDNA
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
wnrKsneet L : �Jrn_annn L
Page 1 of 4
Summary of Situation 2 criteria: from calculation procedure STEP 1 thru STEPS, Worksheet 1:
Applicable area (A)* _ $- Iq acres
IPost _ (total post -development impervious cover +A) x 100 446%
k.t..hed = N Ip % or I,,t,,,,d = 16%
I..;,ffng = (total existing impervious cover - A*) x 100 = %
I.6d,g G % s 42ftnhed 1 V %; and
I�.. 00A, 0%> � 1.f. %
STEP 4 Determine the relative pre -development pollutant load (LP,j.
LPnc..1.shed> _ [0.05 + (0.009 x Ir„d)] x A x 2.28 (Equation 5-16)
where: LP,a = relative pre -development total phosphorous load (pounds per year)
4.,,�ha = average land cover condition for specific watershed or locality ar
the Chesapeake Bay default value of 16% (percent expressed in
whole numbers)
A = applicable area (acres)
LPrc(wat,.b.d) _ 10.05 + (0.009 x �L )l x 5. 01 x 2.28
= Z . 3o pounds per year
5D-9
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Worksheet 2 • Situation 2
Page 2 of 4
STEP S Determine the relative post -development pollutant load (Lpo,J.
LPG _ [0.05 + (0.009 x WSJ] x A x 2.28 (Equation 5-21)
where: Lpms = relative post -development total phosphorous load (pounds per
year)
40ss = post -development percent impervious cover (percent expressed in
whole numbers)
A = applicable area (acres)
Lp,a = [0.05 + (0.009 x )] x S, l9 x 2.28
Z • V 6 pounds per year
STET' 6 Determine the relative pollutant removal requirement (RR).
RR = Lpost - Lp.(w=�b_a)
RR = 2.6L _ 7"3a
0.)L pounds per year
STEPS Identify best management practice (BMP) for the site.
1. Determine the required pollutant removal efficiency for the site:
EFT = (RR—. Lp.) x 100 (Equation 5-22)
where: EFF = required pollutant removal efficiency (percent expressed in whole
numbers)
RR = pollutant removal requirement (pounds per year)
Lp,& = relative post -development total phosphorous load (pounds per
year)
EFF=(9-36 = 2.(P1Y )x100 ,
%
5D-10
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Worksheet 2 : Situation 2
11 Page 3 of 4
2. Select BNIP(s) from Table 5-Wand locate on the site:
BNIP 1: Ot.1 to^ A
3. Determine the pollutant load entering the proposed BNIP(s):
Law _ [0.05 + (0.009 x IBw)] x A x 2.28 (Equation 5-23)
where: LBt � = relative post -development total phosphorous load entering
proposed BMP (pounds per year)
Iaw = post -development percent impervious cover of BMP drainage area
(percent expressed in whole numbers)
A = drainage area of proposed BNIP (acres)
LBmp, = [0.05 + (0.009 x 11 S1' )] x S t9 x 2.28
pounds per year
LBO _ [0.05 + (0.009 x )] x x 2.28
pounds per year
LBml.3 = [0.05 + (0.009 x )] x x 2.28
pounds per year
5D-11
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D' :
Worksbeet 2 - Situation 2
Page 4 of 4
4. Calculate the pollutant load removed by the proposed BMP(s):
Lremoved — EffBMP x '-BW
(Equation 5-24)
where: L1e mved = Post -development pollutant load removed by proposed BMP
(pounds per year)
EffBw = pollutant removal efficiency of BMP (expressed in decimal form)
L he = relative post -development total phosphorous load entering
proposed BMP (pounds per year)
Lremeved/BMPl = o - 35 x 2 - G (. = D .11 pounds per year
Lremoved/BMP2 = x = pounds per year
Lremoved/BIMIP3 x = pounds per year
5. Calculate the total pollutant load removed by the BMP(s):
Lremoved/totw — Loved/BMPI + L=oved/BMP2 +'' mmovedMW3 + - . • (Equation 5-25)
where: Lmmovewmml =
total pollutant load removed by proposed BMPs
L.."NB,I —
pollutant load removed by proposed BMP No. 1
L,m eV.YBM =
pollutant load removed by proposed BNO No. 2
L.oved/BW3 =
pollutant load removed by proposed BMP No. 3
LremovedAotW = 0.13 + to to + W A +. _
= O A S pounds per year
6. Verify compliance:
Le ,w z RR
off— z 0.310
5D-12
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
�aurtiy�.aa��
De
termine the applicable area (A) and the post -developed impervious cover
(IP.J.
Applicable area (A)* = (A—) acres
Post -development impervious cover:
structures =acres
JAN,t ol( paregh7t = O • o -acres
v.l is
other:
roadway = G • ! 1 acres
.=—acres
acres
Total = nacres
Ins = (total post -development impervious cover i- A) x 100 = 2 1:11 %
* The area subject to the criteria may vary from locality to locality. Therefore,
consult the locality for proper determination of this value.
STEP 2 Determine the average land cover condition (Iw I shed) br the existing
impervious cover (1.,.g).
Average land cover condition ",d):
If the locality has determined land cover conditions for individual watersheds within its
jurisdiction, use the watershed specific value determined by the locality as Iw,hed.
'wamshed = N 0,
o�n
Otherwise, use the Chesapeake Bay default value:
shed =16%
5D-5
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Worksheet t
Page 2 of 3
Determine the existing impervious cover of the development site if present.
Existing impervious cover:
structures =---2-acres
parking lot =--- -acres
roadway = O acres
other:
,=-acres
acres
Total = acres
IC1i1s ft = (total existing impervious cover - A*) x 100 = 0 %
The area should be the same as used in STEP 1.
STEP 3 Determine the appropriate development situation.
The site information determined in STEP 1 and STEP 2 provide enough information to
determine the appropriate development situation under which the performance criteria will apply.
Check (✓) the appropriate development situation as follows:
Situation 1: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (I� �,og) is less than or equal to the average land cover condition
(I...j and the proposed improvements will create a total percent
impervious cover (I . j which is less than or rAual to the average land
cover condition
IP-t % 5 L.Ml ed %
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Worksheet 1
Page 3 of 3
Situation 2: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (I �,.d is less than or equal to the average land cover condition
(Ia,..,j and the proposed improvements will create a total percent
impervious cover (I .) which is greater than the average land cover
condition (IW91e hey.
I"i„ng din S watershed `& %;and
Ipost Zt.'1je %>'watershed 'y %
Situation 3: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (I....d is greater than the average land cover condition (I,,,,,.,j.
Iesistiag din > 4.tershed %
Situation 4: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (1�) is served by an existing stormwater management BMP(s)
that addresses water 4 taadttr.
If the proposed development meets the criteria for development Situation 1, than the low
density development is considered to be the BMP and no pollutant removal is required.
The calculation procedure for Situation 1 stops here. If the proposed development meets
the criteria for development Situations 2, 3, or 4, then proceed to STEP on the
appropriate worksheet.
5D-7
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Mr
Worksheet 2: Situation 2
Page I of 4
Summary of Situation 2 criteria: from calculation procedure STEP 1 thru STEP 3, Worksheet 1:
Applicable area (A)* _ (0• (3 acres
IPWt = (total post -development impervious cover - A) x 100 = Z 1- 11 ^/n
Lambed = N 14 (Ay or I,,hd = 16%
Ie,dsdng = (total existing impervious cover _ A*) x 100 = O %
o d /^ I V %/
Iexisting � '7 watershed ^; and
Ipn,t •�i l ^/n Iwatershed' 14 %
STEP 4 Determine the relative pre -development pollutant load (LP.).
LP -(watershed) _ [0.05 + (0.009 x Ia,] x A x 2.28 (Equation 5-16)
where: Lp,,(w t. be) = relative pre -development total phosphorous load (pounds per year)
Iwatershed = average land cover condition for specific watershed or locality ar
the Chesapeake Bay default value of 16% (percent expressed in
whole numbers)
A = applicable area (acres)
Lpre(watershed) = [0.05 + (0.009 x ( )] x '" \ 1 x 2.28
= Z • �+ I pounds per year
5D-9
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Worksheet 2 : Situation 2
Page 2 of 4
STEP 5 Determine the relative post -development pollutant load (LP.).
LPaa _ [0.05 + (0.009 x W] x A x 2.28 (Equation 5-21)
where: Lpwt = relative post -development total phosphorous load (pounds per
year)
Ip�t = post -development percent impervious cover (percent expressed in
whole numbers)
A = applicable area (acres)
LPG _ [0.05 + (0.009 x Z t-'K )] x Hi.11 x 2.28
3 W S pounds per year
STEP 6 Determine the relative pollutant removal requirement (RR).
RR = LP„e - LF, (—
RR = 141 - 2-1
= 0 -11 pounds per year
STEP 7 Identify best management practice (BMP) for the site.
1. Determine the required pollutant removal efficiency for the site:
EFF = (RR _ Lp,,) x 100 (Equation 5-22)
where: EFF = required pollutant removal efficiency (percent expressed in whole
numbers)
RR = pollutant removal requirement (pounds per year)
Lp., = relative post -development total phosphorous load (pounds per
year)
EFF = ( QJ'- + IMS ) x 100
10-hi %
5D-10
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Worksheet 2 : Situation 2
Page 3 of 4 .
Select BMP(s) from Table 5-Wand locate on the site:
BMP1: Vief�'�l•yh`�1 �.n5.�,%.ptriliJ ev-!w
BMP 2:,
BMP
3. Determine the pollutant load entering the proposed BMP(s):
LB„o, _ [0.05 + (0.009 x IBw)] x A x 2.28 (Equation 5-23)
where: LBw = relative post -development total phosphorous load entering
proposed BMP (pounds per year)
1Bw = post -development percent impervious cover of BMP drainage area
(percent expressed in whole numbers)
A = drainage area of proposed BN2 (acres)
LB l _ [0.05 + (0.009 x I 1 .l L )] x x 2.28
13.45 pounds per year
LBr,02 = [0.05 + (0.009 x )] x x 2.28
pounds per year
LBw3 _ [0.05 + (0.009 x )] x x 2.28
pounds per year
5D-11
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX SD
Worksheet 2 : Situation 2
Page 4 of 4
4. Calculate the pollutant load removed by the proposed BMP(s):
Lremoved = EffBw X LBW
(Equation 5-24)
where: L,. .d = Post -development pollutant load removed by proposed BMP
(pounds per year)
EffBw = pollutant removal efficiency of BMP (expressed in decimal form)
LBAe = relative post -development total phosphorous load entering
proposed BMP (pounds per year)
L�m:aieasi —
O. bS
LremovedMW2 =
Lremove"W3 =
X 3. L(S pounds per year
X = pounds per year
X = pounds per year
5. Calculate the total pollutant load removed by the BMP(s):
Lremo ewtow = L.o�dMhe, + L,® mp2 + L�o,,wB p3 + ... (Equation 5-25)
where: L ®o�eano� =
total pollutant load removed by proposed BMPs
L..d'B I�
pollutant load removed by proposed BMP No. 1
L,=1.dMMP2 =
pollutant load removed by proposed BMP No. 2
L.ovemMM =
pollutant load removed by proposed BMP No. 3
Lremoved/totA = + tN I Pt +
pounds per year
6. Verify compliance:
Lremoved/tatw 2 RR
1.2,4 z q, 71L
063PA
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPI~NDIX 5D
6 Me °l
Worksheet 1
Page 1 of 3
STEP 1 Determine the applicable area (A) and the post -developed impervious cover
Applicable area (A)* _ • L 1 acres
Post -development impervious cover:
structures = • c 3 acres
parking lot = D acres
roadway = acres
other:
acres
acres
Total — �'�3 acres
Ip�. = (total post -development impervious cover -A) X 100 = 2 • %
* The area subject to the criteria may vary from locality to locality. Therefore,
consult the locality for proper determination of this value.
STEP 2 Determine the average land cover condition (I ,re � Dr the existing
impervious cover (ILL d- ).
Age land cover conditinn�:
If the locality has determined land cover conditions for individual watersheds within its
jurisdiction, use the watershed specific value determined by the locality as watershed.
I..hed = r 1P %
Otherwise, use the Chesapeake Bay default value:
I.tarshed =16%
5D-5
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS '` APPENDIX 5D
yrsu�®�
Workcheet 1
Page 2 of 3
WIi• u6-u4
Determine the existing impervious cover of the development site if present.
Existing impervious cover:
other:
structures --Oacres
parking lot = 9 acres
roadway = O acres
acres
acres
Total — acres
L aos = (total existing impervious cover - A*) x 100 = O %
The area should be the same as used in STEP 1.
STEPS Determine the appropriate development situation.
The site information determined in STEP 1 and STEP 2 provide enough information to
determine the appropriate development situation under which the performance criteria will apply.
Check (✓) the appropriate development situation as follows:
Situation 1: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (I t d is le than than or e4 ual to the average land cover condition
(J4.,.�d) and the proposed improvements will create a total percent
impervious cover &J which is less than or equal to the average land
cover condition (I.,,
Ip"t 0% S I..tenhed %
i
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Worksheet 1
Page 3 of 3
Situation 2: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (I,.i,,i g) is less than or equal to the average land cover condition
(1.,e hed) and the proposed improvements will create a total percent
impervious cover (1�at) which is greater than the average land cover
condition
if o
Iezistiog (% ^ �" � Iwatershed ; and
Ipost ' K % % > 'watershed . (b % 51 t (( n ! a.i1 4+ \ c l
Situation 3: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (I".;.a g) is greater than the average land cover condition (I„.I.J.
0 T
Iezistiag ^ � 'watershed %
Situation 4: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (l) is served by an existing stormwater management BMP(s)
that addresses water quality.
If the proposed development meets the criteria for development Situation 1, than the low
density development is considered to be the BMP and no pollutant removal is required.
The calculation procedure for Situation 1 stops here. If the proposed development meets
the criteria for development Situations 2, 3, or 4, then proceed to STEP 4 on the
appropriate worksheet.
5D-7
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS - APPENDIX 5D
worKsneec � : a�manon �
Page I of 4
Summary of Situation 2 criteria: from calculation procedure STET' 1 thru STEP 3, Worksheet 1:
Applicable area (A)* _ I ""I acres
IP'n _ (total post -development impervious cover = A) X 100 = %
'watershed — Ntp d/n or I.,.,hed = 16%
I.tce,g = (total existing impervious cover = A*) x 100 =1- &U %n
I
l t. o e,d�ng Q o/n 5 Iwatershed /n, and
IP t Z 41 %n > ' watenhea 14 %n
STEP Determine the relative pre -development pollutant load (L,.)-
Lpn(watershed) _ [0.05 + (0.009 X Iat.,he)] x A x 2.28 (Equation 5-16)
where: L,.(,.,.y ) = relative pre -development total phosphorous load (pounds per year)
Iµat� = average land cover condition for specific watershed or locality nr
the Chesapeake Bay default value of 16%_(percent expressed in
whole numbers)
A = applicable area (acres)
LPrs .t.h h.o _ [0.05 + (0.009 x 16 )j " 1-7' 1 X 2.28
= O • S4 pounds per year
60SO,
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Work -beet 2 : Situation 2
Page 2 of 4
STEP 5 Determine the relative post -development pollutant load (LP.).
LP,rt = [0.05 + (0.009 x 4,)] x A x 2.28 (Equation 5-21)
where: Lp-t = relative post -development total phosphorous load (pounds per
year)
4m = post -development percent impervious cover (percent expressed in
whole numbers)
A = applicable area (acres)
Lpw _ [0.05 + (0.009 x 1" �1 )] x i ' to x 2.28
d . L pounds per year
STEPS Determine the relative pollutant removal requirement (RR).
RR = Lp,n - Lp.(wa...h d)
RR = o ' 1^ - 0.94
_ - o' 3 Y pounds per year
STEP 7 Identify best management practice (BlAP) for the site.
1. Determine the required pollutant removal efficiency for the site:
EFF = ( RR = Lp,,t ) x 100 (Equation 5-22)
where: EFF = required pollutant removal efficiency (percent expressed in whole
numbers)
RR = pollutant removal requirement (pounds per year)
1-1-st = relative post -development total phosphorous load (pounds per
yam)
00
O-Om:
PERFORMANCE -BASED -WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Worksheet 2 : Situation 2
( Page 3 of 4
11
2. Select BMP(s) from Table 5-Wand locate on the site:
BMP 1: all 1. o" S • 1. :.�< inn` .r % 4%
BMP 2:,
3. Determine the pollutant load entering the proposed BMP(s):
LBm7 _ [0.05 + (0.009 x I..)] x A x 2.28 (Equation 5-23)
where: Law = relative post -development total phosphorous load entering
proposed BMP (pounds per year)
IBw = post -development percent impervious cover of BMP drainage area
(percent expressed in whole numbers)
A = drainage area of proposed BW (acres)
LBWI = [0.05 + (0.009 x 2.4 1 )] x 21 x 2.28
O. Z o pounds per year
LB n _ [0.05 + (0.009 x )] x x 2.28
pounds per year
LB.W3 [0.05 + (0.009 x )] x x 2.28
pounds per year
5D-11
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Workcbeet 2 : Situation 2
Page 4 of 4
4. Calculate the pollutant load removed by the proposed BMP(s):
L�"Cd = EffBw X I-,.
(Equation 5-24)
where: L�.,d = Post -development pollutant load removed by proposed BNP
(pounds per year)
EffBw = pollutant removal efficiency of BNP (expressed in decimal form)
LBw = relative post -development total phosphorous load entering
proposed BMP (pounds per year)
Lr owdMNW1 = x 0•%° = 0.11 pounds per year
L. dMMP2 = X = pounds per year
L«owd/B?s3 = X = pounds per year
5. Calculate the total pollutant load removed by the BNP(s):
L�Ove&wt,l = L.�&Bhel + Lam, mm + L...mmn + ... (Equation 5-25)
where: L..dt,,a =
total pollutant load removed by proposed BMPs
L.."W1=
pollutant load removed by proposed BMP No. 1
L.,,.&Bmn =
pollutant load removed by proposed BNP No. 2
L.1143M =
pollutant load removed by proposed BMP No. 3
LRmaved fttW = 0.13 + tr 1 % + N 16 + .. .
OT pounds per year
6. Verify compliance:
L, Vvem to z RR
5D-12
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Page 1 of 3
STEP 1 Determine the applicable area (A) and the post -developed impervious cover
(1p..)•
Applicable area (A)* = 0.O t acres
Post -development impervious cover:
other:
structures = O •O 3 acres
parking lot = ►+ I k acres
roadway = N 1° acres
.=-acres
acres
Total = • 03 acres
Ivy = (total post -development impervious cover - A) X 100 = %
The area subject to the criteria may vary from locality to locality. Therefore,
consult the locality for proper determination of this value.
STEP 2 Determine the average land cover condition (4,t,„h,d nr the eadsting
impervious cover (I�d.
Average land cover condition ",,,J:
If the locality has determined land cover conditions for individual watersheds within its
jurisdiction, use the watershed specific value determined by the locality as I...
Lmrsh.d = N 1& a/„
Otherwise, use the Chesapeake Bay default value:
I,anw =16%
5D-5
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 51)
awl
Worksheet t
Page 2 of 3
t• ue-r�s � a 1
Determine the existing impervious cover of the development site if present.
Existing impervious cover:
other:
structures = acres
parking lot = acres
roadway = acres
acres
acres
Total — acres
I _ (total existing impervious cover- A*) X 100 = O %
The area should be the same as used in STEP 1.
STEP 3 Determine the appropriate development situation.
The site information determined in STEP 1 and STEP 2 provide enough information to
determine the appropriate development situation under which the performance criteria will apply.
Check (✓) the appropriate development situation as follows:
Situation 1: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (I.,td is less than or equal to the average land cover condition
(Iaat� and the proposed improvements will create a total percent
impervious cover (I,,.) which is I ess than or equal to the average land
cover condition (Iaa,C},hd).
Ipost 0/0 < 'watershed %
i
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
F
Worksheet 1
Page 3 of 3
Situation 2: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover hex is less than or areal to the average land cover condition
(IN„ and the proposed improvements will create a total percent
impervious cover (I . j which is greater than the average land cover
condition (Ia,,...hed).
o o
Ie:htiog O /� s I,,,�,� L/ /�> and
IPA •Z� %>4..hed 1/ % -4 �V ire
M�
Situation 3: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (I.;,, d is =ater than the average land cover condition
%
T %
Situation 4: This consists of land development where the existing percent impervious
cover (I�, is served by an existing stormwater management BMP(s)
that addresses water quality.
If the proposed development meets the criteria for development Situation 1, than the low
density development is considered to be the BMP and no pollutant removal is required.
The calculation procedure for Situation 1 stops here. If the proposed development meets
the criteria for development Situations 2, 3, or 4, then proceed to STEP on the
appropriate worksheet.
Fj MA
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
VA r
Wnrksheet 2 : Situation 2
Page 1 of 4
Summary of Situation 2 criteria: from calculation procedure STEP I thru STET' 3, Worksheet 1:
Applicable area (A)* = O ,'4 L acres
IpoSt _ (total post -development impervious cover +A) x 100 = T 2"4 %
4.ft.hw = NIP % or IaBC�� = 16%
I.i,u.g = (total existing impervious cover - A*) x 100 = o %
Iezisting e% s Iwatenhed ` %, and
IP,t 3.1A °�� > h� l t.
STEP Determine the relative pre -development pollutant load (LP,j.
Lpm("tershed) = [0.05 + (0.009 x Iy��] x A x 2.28 (Equation 5-16)
where: Lp.(.. . = relative pre -development total phosphorous load (pounds per year)
m a = average land cover condition for specific watershed or locality m:
the Chesapeake Bay default value of 16% (percent expressed in
whole numbers)
A = applicable area (acres)
LPre(,,,a„6eM = [0.05 + (0.009 x �)] x G '11' x 2.28
= 3.,111 . pounds per year
5D-9
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS,, APPENDIX 5D
Worksheet 2 : Situation 2
Page 2 of 4
STEP 5 Determine the relative post -development pollutant load (LP,j.
LP„t = [0.05 + (0.009 x Ip,,,)] x A x 2.28 (Equation 5-21)
where: Lp., = relative post -development total phosphorous load (pounds per
year)
4.8t = post -development percent impervious cover (percent expressed in
whole numbers)
A = applicable area (acres)
Lp"t _ [0.05 + (0.009 x 7. 7, (0)] x O. x 2.28
_ 0 400�_ pounds per year
19TEP Determine the relative pollutant removal requirement (RR).
RR = Lp.t — Lp.(.=.hea)
RR = b •\'+ - 3.1 3
= — I. • 9 pounds per year
STEP Z Identify best management practice (BMP) for the site.
1. Determine the required pollutant removal efficiency for the site:
EFF = (RR +Lpo,t) x 100 (Equation 5-22)
where: EFF = required pollutant removal efficiency (percent expressed in whole
numbers)
RR = pollutant removal requirement (pounds per year)
Lpo„ = relative post -development total phosphorous load (pounds per
year)
EFF = (` Z•IL _ a". ) x 100
- N to %
5D-10
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
s�zars�r-- —■
Worksheet 2 : Situation 2
11 Page 3 of 4
2. Select BMP(s) from Table 5-],Sand locate on the site:
h
BMP1: ;,*r44""1- I.o 5.0-1. �4%net.414W prc"
BMP
PEN
3. Determine the pollutant load entering the proposed BMP(s):
LB w _ [0.05 + (0.009 x IB.)] x A x 2.28 (Equation 5-23)
where: LBw = relative post -development total phosphorous load entering
proposed BMP (pounds per year)
IBw = post -development percent impervious cover of BMP drainage area
(percent expressed in whole numbers)
A = drainage area of proposed BMP (acres)
LBmp, _ [0.05 + (0.009 x 3 • L V )] x -'11 x 2.28
= O.1 } pounds per year
LB,22 = [0.05 + (0.009 x )] x x 2.28
pounds per year
LB�23 = [0.05 + (0.009 x )] x x 2.28
pounds per year
SD-11
PERFORMANCE -BASED WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 5D
Worksbeet 2: Situation 2
Page 4 of 4
4. Calculate the pollutant load removed by the proposed BMP(s):
Lremwed — EffBw X LBw
(Equation 5-24)
where: L,, d = Post -development pollutant load removed by proposed BMP
(pounds per year)
EffB w = pollutant removal efficiency of BMP (expressed in decimal form)
LBw = relative post -development total phosphorous load entering
proposed BNIP (pounds per year)
Lmm edBMP3
Lremoved/BM02
Lremowd/BMP3
O. fps, X 0. % 1 pounds per year
X = pounds per year
X = pounds per year
5. Calculate the total pollutant load removed by the BMP(s):
Lremevemtetw — LremovedMWI - L.oved%MM + 4temweMR3 + • • • (Equation 5-25)
where: Lremoved total =
total pollutant load removed by proposed BMPs
Lil.m el =
pollutant load removed by proposed BMP No. 1
Li IvId BMP2 =
pollutant load removed by proposed BMP No. 2
Lremo .mm =
pollutant load removed by proposed BMP No. 3
Lremovedttotat — ." + N 1 6 + IM I L + .. .
()j' k 1 pounds per year
6. Verify compliance:
Lremoved/toul Z RR
5D-12
ADEQUATE OUTFALL CROSS -SECTIONS
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk®AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.
Wednesday, Jun 3 2015
Section A
User -defined
Highlighted
Invert Elev (ft)
= 464.08
Depth (ft)
= 0.13
Slope (%)
= 3.40
Q (Cfs)
= 0.340
N-Value
= 0.035
Area(sgft)
= 0.28
Velocity (ft/s)
= 1.23
Calculations
Wetted Perim (ft)
= 4.29
Compute by:
Known Q
Crit Depth, Yc (ft)
= 0.13
Known Q (cfs)
= 0.34
Top Width (ft)
= 4.25
EGL (ft)
= 0.15
(Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)...
( 0.00, 467.69)-(7.36, 466.83, 0.050)-(11.60, 464.08, 0.035)-(15.65, 464.21, 0.035)-(17.43, 467.03, 0.035)-(34.22, 466.10, 0.050)
Elev (ft) Section
468.00
467.00
466.00
iA
465.00
464.00
463.00
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Sta (ft)
Depth (ft)
3.92
2.92
1.92
0.92
-1.08
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension forAutodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.
Wednesday, Jun 3 2015
Section B
User -defined
Highlighted
Invert Elev (ft) = 466.57
Depth (ft)
= 0.50
Slope (%) = 1.30
Q (cfs)
= 4.720
N-Value = 0.035
Area (sqft)
= 2.28
Velocity (ft/s)
= 2.07
Calculations
Wetted Perim (ft)
= 7.86
Compute by: Known Q
Crit Depth, Yc (ft)
= 0.43
Known Q (cfs) = 4.72
Top Width (ft)
= 7.70
EGL (ft)
= 0.57
(Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)...
(0.00, 469.64)-(12.59, 469.76, 0.050)-(19.77, 466.94, 0.035)-(26.25, 466.57, 0.035)-(33.51, 470.66, 0.035)-(47.98, 470.40, 0.050)
Elev (ft)
471.00 --1
470.00
469.00
468.00
467.00
466.00
Section
465.00 ' '
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 5°
Sta (ft)
Depth (ft)
4.43
3.43
2.43
1.43
0.43
-0.57
-1.57
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension farAutodesk®AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.
Wednesday, Jun 3 2015
Section C
User -defined
Highlighted
Invert Elev (ft)
= 476.30
Depth (ft)
= 0.48
Slope (%)
= 1.54
Q (cfs)
= 4.720
N-Value
= 0.035
Area (sqft)
= 2.09
Velocity (ft/s)
= 2.26
Calculations
Wetted Perim (ft)
= 7.13
Compute by:
Known Q
Crit Depth, Yc (ft)
= 0.42
Known Q (cfs)
= 4.72
Top Width (ft)
= 7.01
EGL (ft)
= 0.56
(Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)...
(0.00, 478.04)-(10.44, 476.95, 0.050)-(14.18, 476.30, 0.035)-(18.09, 476.55, 0.035)-(24.95, 481.22, 0.035)-(32.06, 481.73,
0.050)
III��_� �IIIIIII!•�_���Illlll����
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Sta (ft)
Depth (ft)
5.70
4.70
3.70
2.70
1.70
0.70
-0.30
-1.30
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3170 by Autodesk, Inc.
Wednesday, Jun 3 2015
Section D
User -defined
Highlighted
Invert Elev (ft)
= 603.24
Depth (ft)
= 0.23
Slope (%)
= 11.76
Q (Cfs)
= 3.190
N-Value
= 0.035
Area (sgft)
= 0.94
Velocity (ft/s)
= 3.39
Calculations
Wetted Perim (ft)
= 7.65
Compute by:
Known Q
Crit Depth, Yc (ft)
= 0.29
Known Q (cfs)
= 3.19
Top Width (ft)
= 7.63
EGL (ft)
= 0.41
(Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)...
(0.00, 604.27)-(12.47, 603.83, 0.050)-(16.21, 603.37, 0.035)-(18.56, 603.24, 0.035)-(32.94, 603.98, 0.035)-(38.37 604.72, 0.050)
Elev (ft) Section
605.00
604.50
604.00
603.50
603.00
602.50
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Sta (ft)
Depth (ft)
1.76
1.26
0.76
0.26
-0.24
-0.74
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension far Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.
Wednesday, Jun 3 2015
Section E
User -defined
Highlighted
Invert Elev (ft)
= 513.76
Depth (ft)
= 0.56
Slope (%)
= 4.83
Q (cfs)
= 7.660
N-Value
= 0.035
Area (sgft)
= 1.83
Velocity (ft/s)
= 4.18
Calculations
Wetted Perim (ft)
= 5.97
Compute by:
Known Q
Crit Depth, Yc (ft)
= 0.63
Known Q (cfs)
= 7.66
Top Width (ft)
= 5.71
EGL (ft)
= 0.83
(Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)...
( 0.00, 517.39)-(16.46, 515.83, 0.050)-(18.63, 513.76, 0.035)-(23.13, 514.16, 0.035)-(26.21, 514.95, 0.035)-(45.35, 516.15, 0.050)
Elev (ft) Section
518.00
517.00
516.00
515.00
514.00
513.00
512.00
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Sta (ft)
Depth (ft)
4.24
3.24
2.24
1.24
0.24
-0.76
-1.76
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk®AutoCAD® Civil 3130 by Autodesk, Inc.
Wednesday, Jun 3 2015
Section F
User -defined
Highlighted
Invert Elev (ft) = 493.95
Depth (ft)
= 0.66
Slope (%) = 3.08
Q (cfs)
= 10.14
N-Value = 0.035
Area(sgft)
= 2.80
Velocity (ft/s)
= 3.63
Calculations
Wetted Perim (ft)
= 7.78
Compute by: Known Q
Crit Depth, Yc (ft)
= 0.68
Known Q (cfs) = 10.14
Top Width (ft)
= 7.60
EGL (ft)
= 0.86
(Sta, El, n)-(Sta,
El, n)...
(0.00, 499.21}(18.43,
498.64, 0.050)-(23.88, 494.49, 0.035)-(29.40, 493.95, 0.035)-(32.08, 494.87, 0.035)-(39.37, 497.69, 0.050)-(48.87, 497.71, 0.050)
Elev (ft)
500.00
499.00
498.00
497.00
496.00
495.00
494.00
493.00
492.00
-5
0 5
Section
Depth (ft)
6,05
5.05
4.05
3.05
2.05
1.05
0.05
-0.95
-1.95
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Sta (ft)
Channel Report
Hydreflow Express Extension for Autodesk®AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Friday, Jun 5 2015
Section G
User -defined
Highlighted
Invert Elev (ft)
= 470.50
Depth (ft)
= 0.48
Slope (%)
= 1.60
Q (Cfs)
= 6.760
N-Value
= 0.035
Area (sqft)
= 2.37
Velocity (ft/s)
= 2.86
Calculations
Wetted Perim (ft)
= 6.09
Compute by:
Known Q
Crit Depth, Yc (ft)
= 0.42
Known Q (cfs)
= 6.76
Top Width (ft)
= 5.86
EGL (ft)
= 0.61
(Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)...
(0.00, 479.50)-(8.00, 478.50, 0.050)-(23.00, 470.50, 0.035)-(27.00, 470.50, 0.035)-(43.00, 478.50, 0.035)-(50.00, 479.00,
0.050)
Elev (ft)
480.00 --r
478.00
476.00
474.00
472.00
470.00
468.00
-5
Section
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 5°
Sta (ft)
Depth (ft)
9.50
7.50
5.50
3.50
1.50
-0.50
-2.50
Channel Report
Hydreflow Express Extension for Autodesk®AutoCAD® Civil 3139 by Autodesk, Inc.
Friday, Jun 5 2015
Section H
User -defined
Highlighted
Invert Elev (ft)
= 454.20
Depth (ft)
= 0.51
Slope (%)
= 2.66
Q (cfs)
= 14.39
N-Value
= 0.035
Area (sgft)
= 3.68
Velocity (ft1s)
= 3.91
Calculations
Wetted Perim (ft)
= 8.63
Compute by:
Known Q
Crit Depth, Yc (ft)
= 0.53
Known Q (cfs)
= 14.39
Top Width (ft)
= 8.42
EGL (ft)
= 0.75
(Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)...
( 0.00, 464.00)-(9.00, 462.20, 0.050)-(25.00, 454.20, 0.035)-(31.00, 454.20, 0.035)-(53.00, 462.20, 0.035)-(58.00, 463.00, 0.050)
Elev (ft)
466.00
464.00
462.00
460.00
458.00
456.00
454.00
452.00
-5 0 5 10
Section
Depth (ft)
11.80
Ma
7.80
3.80
1.80
-0.20
-2.20
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Sta (ft)
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autadesk®AutoCAD® Civil 306 by Autodesk, Inc.
Wednesday, Jun 3 2015
Section I
User -defined
Highlighted
Invert Elev (ft) = 439.42
Depth (ft)
= 1.04
Slope (%) = 1.71
Q (cfs)
= 23.53
N-Value = 0.035
Area (sqft)
= 5.84
Velocity (ft/s)
= 4.03
Calculations
Wetted Perim (ft)
= 9.35
Compute by: Known Q
Crit Depth, Yc (ft)
= 0.99
Known Q (cfs) = 23.53
Top Width (ft)
= 9.01
EGL (ft)
= 1.29
(Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)...
( 0.00, 443.87)-(19.83, 442.18, 0.050)-(23.44, 439.78, 0.035)-(26.91, 439.42, 0.035)-(30.74, 440.23, 0.035)-(35.56, 441.86, 0.035)-(50.59, 443.27, 0.050)
-(63.93, 443.76, 0.050)
Elev (ft)
444.00 --1
443.00
442.00
441.00
440.00
439.00
438.00
Section
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Depth (ft)
4.58
3.58
2.58
0.58
-0.42
-1.42
Sta (ft)
Channel Report
Hydreflow Express Extension for Autodesk®AutoCAD® Civil3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Wednesday, Jun 3 2015
Section J
User -defined
Highlighted
Invert Elev (ft) = 442.18
Depth (ft)
= 0.47
Slope (%) = 3.55
Q (cfs)
= 2.950
N-Value = 0.036
Area (sqft)
= 1.02
Velocity (ft/s)
= 2.88
Calculations
Wetted Perim (ft)
= 4.29
Compute by: Known Q
Crit Depth, Yc (ft)
= 0.48
Known Q (cfs) = 2.95
Top Width (ft)
= 4.07
EGL (ft)
= 0.60
(Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)...
(0.00, 448.00)-(12.14, 447.76, 0.050)-(17.99, 442.18, 0.035)-(21.32,
442.58, 0.035)-(28.19, 444.50, 0.050}(40.56, 444.53, 0.050)
Elev (ft)
449.00
448.00
447.00
446.00
445.00
444.00
443.00
442.00
441.00
-5
no
Section Depth (ft)
6.82
5.82
4.82
3.82
2.82
1.82
0.82
-0.18
-1.18
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Sta (ft)
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension forAutodesk® AutoCAD® Civil3130 by Autodesk, Inc. Wednesday, Jun 3 2015
Section K
User -defined
Highlighted
Invert Elev (ft)
= 438.46
Depth (ft)
= 0.23
Slope (%)
= 1.46
Q (cfs)
= 3.130
N-Value
= 0.036
Area (sqft)
= 1.83
Velocity (ft/s)
= 1.71
Calculations
Wetted Perim (ft)
= 9.05
Compute by:
Known Q
Crit Depth, Yc (ft)
= 0.19
Known Q (cfs)
= 3.13
Top Width (ft)
= 8.95
EGL (ft) = 0.28
(Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)...
( 0.00, 441.65)-(15.46, 441.07. 0.050)-(20.14, 438,46, 0.035)-(28.19, 438.49, 0.035)-(32.99, 440.47, 0.050)-(44.38, 441.11, 0.050)
Elev (ft) Section
442.00
441.00
440.00
439.00
438.00
437.00
5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Sta (ft)
Depth (ft)
3.54
2.64
1.54
0.54
-1.46
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension forAutodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® byAutodesk, Inc. Wednesday, Jun 3 2015
Section L
User -defined
Highlighted
Invert Elev (ft) = 424.53
Depth (ft)
= 0.94
Slope (%) = 2.75
Q (cfs)
= 26.93
N-Value = 0.042
Area (sqft)
= 7.06
Velocity (fUs)
= 3.81
Calculations
Wetted Perim (ft)
= 13.22
Compute by: Known Q
Crit Depth, Yc (ft)
= 0.91
Known Q (cfs) = 26.93
Top Width (ft)
= 12.93
EGL (ft)
= 1.17
(Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)...
(0.00, 431.35)-(7.68, 429.61, 0.050)-(19.76, 429.56, 0.040}(22.67, 425.26, 0.040)-(32.55, 424.53, 0.040)-(46.74, 429,11,
0.050)-(74.56, 431.75, 0.050)
Elev (ft)
432.00
431.00
430.00
429.00
428.00
427.00
426.00
Section
Depth (ft)
7.47
6.47
5.47
EI E,fl
3.47
2.47
1.47
=I�C�tttttt�,lttzi�.t:it�t�t:it:itz�t�t�tt�
„ t�t�t�t�ltt�ltt�tt�filt�tt�t�t�t�t�t��t� ,
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3139 by Autodesk, Inc.
Wednesday, Jun 3 2015
Section M
User -defined.
Highlighted
Invert Elev (ft) = 414.35
Depth (ft)
= 2.29
Slope (%) = 1.58
Q (cfs)
= 78.16
N-Value = 0.042
Area (sgft)
= 17.25
Velocity (ft/s)
= 4.53
Calculations
Wetted Perim (ft)
= 16.69
Compute by: Known Q
Crit Depth, Yc (ft)
= 2.05
Known Q (cfs) = 78.16
Top Width (ft)
= 15.48
EGL (ft)
= 2.61
(Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)...
( 0.00, 418.96)-(7.26, 417.00, 0.050)-(18.26, 415.35, 0.040)-(19.26, 414.59, 0.040)-(22.48, 414.35, 0.040}(26.44, 417.76,
0.050)-(38.78, 421.54, 0,050)
Elev (ft)
422.00
421.00
420.00
419.00
418.00
417.00
416.00
415.00
414.00
413.00
-5
Section
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Sta (ft)
Depth (ft)
7.65
6.65
5.65
4.65
3.65
2.65
1.65
0.65
-0.35
-1.35
45
Channel Report
Hydreflow Express Extension for Autodesk®AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.
Wednesday, Jun 3 2015
Section N
User -defined
Highlighted
Invert Elev (ft) = 413.15
Depth (ft)
= 1.95
Slope (%) = 1.66
Q (cfs)
= 78.16
N-Value = 0.042
Area (sgft)
= 18.18
Velocity (ft1s)
= 4.30
Calculations
Wetted Perim (ft)
= 19.69
Compute by: Known Q
Crit Depth, Yc (ft)
= 1.75
Known Q (cfs) = 78.16
Top Width (ft)
= 18.64
EGL (ft)
= 2.24
(Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)...
(0.00, 418.01)-(19.60, 416.84, 0.050)-(25.53, 415.25, 0.050)-(37.86, 413.98, 0.040)-(38.49, 413.19, 0.040}(42.87, 413.15, 0.040)-(45.96, 415.34, 0.050)
-(55.95, 416.27, 0.050)-(67.36, 421.95, 0.050)
Elev (ft)
422.00
421.00
420.00
419.00
418.00
417.00
416.00
415.00
414.00
413.00
412.00
Section
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
Depth (ft)
8.85
7.85
6.85
5.85
4.85
3.85
2.85
1.85
0.85
-0.15
-1.15
Sta (ft)
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® byAutodesk, Inc.
Wednesday, Jun 3 2015
Section O
User -defined
Highlighted
Invert Elev (ft)
= 410.38
Depth (ft)
= 1.93
Slope (%)
= 1.76
Q (Cfs)
= 78.16
N-Value
= 0.045
Area (sqft)
= 16.27
Velocity (ft/s)
= 4.80
Calculations
Wetted Perim (ft)
= 14.21
Compute by:
Known Q
Crit Depth, Ye (ft)
= 1.70
Known Q (cfs)
= 78.16
Top Width (ft)
= 13.40
EGL (ft)
= 2.29
(Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)...
( 0.00, 415.88)-(26.31, 413.96, 0.050)-(32.01, 410.38, 0.040)-(36.06, 410.49, 0.040)-(46.09, 413.40, 0.050}(70.26, 415.43, 0.050)
Elev (ft)
416.00
415.00
414.00
413.00
412.00
411.00
410.00
409.00
-5 0
Section
Depth (ft)
5.62
4.62
3.62
2.62
1.62
0.62
-0.38
-1.38
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
Sta (ft)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3DO2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Friday, 06 / 5 / 2015
Hyd. No. 40
ADQ E
Hydrograph type
= Combine
Peak discharge
= 7.661 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.03 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 74,229 cuft
Inflow hyds.
= 26, 39
Contrib. drain. area
= 5.780 ac
Q (cfs)
8.00
.e
4.00
2.00
ADQ E
Hyd. No. 40 — 2 Year
0.00 1 '
0 6 12 18 24 30 36
— Hyd No. 40 — Hyd No. 26 — Hyd No. 39
42 48
Q (cfs)
&00
M
2.00
==- 0.00
54
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3
Friday, 06 / 5 / 2015
Hyd. No. 38
ADQ F
Hydrograph type
= Combine
Peak discharge
= 10.14 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.03 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 81,872 cuft
Inflow hyds.
= 27, 37
Contrib. drain. area
= 8.890 ac
Q (cfs)
12.00
10.00
. MM
4.00
2.00
0.00
0 4 8
Hyd No. 38
ADQ F
Hyd. No. 38 — 2 Year
Q (cfs)
12.00
10.00
I I,
. 11
4.00
2.00
ar
0.00
12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52
Time (hrs)
— Hyd No. 27 —Hyd No. 37
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3
Friday, 06 / 5 / 2015
Hyd. No. 43
ADQ G
Hydrograph type
= Combine
Peak discharge
= 6.762 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.07 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 131,498 cuft
Inflow hyds.
= 30, 41, 42
Contrib. drain. area
= 10.660 ac
Q (cfs)
7.00
M
. is
4.00
3.00
2.00
M
0.00 -'
0 6 12
Hyd No. 43
ADQ G
Hyd. No. 43 — 2 Year
18 24
Hyd No. 30
30 36 42
— Hyd No. 41
Q (cfs)
7.00
M
5.00
M
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
48 54 60
Time (hrs)
— Hyd No. 42
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk. Inc. 00.3
Friday, 06 / 5 / 2015
Hyd. No. 46
ADQ H
Hydrograph type
= Combine
Peak discharge
= 14.39 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.13 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 176,107 cuft
Inflow hyds.
= 31, 44, 45
Contrib. drain. area
= 37.990 ac
Q (cfs)
15.00 -
12.00
a II
. rM
ADQ H
Hyd. No. 46 — 2 Year
0.00
0 6 12 18 24 30 36
— Hyd No. 46 — Hyd No. 31 — Hyd No. 44
42 48
— Hyd No. 45
Q (cfs)
15.00
12.00
M
. 12
3.00
M=- 0.00
54
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydreflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 31392014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3 Friday, 06 / 5 / 2015
Hyd. No. 49
ADQ I
Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 23.53 cfs
Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 12.10 hrs
Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 205,555 cuft
Inflow hyds. = 32, 47, 48 Contrib. drain. area = 43.300 ac
ADQI
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 49 -- 2 Year Q (cfs)
24.00
24.00
20.00
20.00
16.00
16.00
12.00
12.00
8.00
8.00
4.00
4.00
0.00 0.00
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52
Hyd No. 49 — Hyd No. 32 — Hyd No. 47 — Hyd No. 48 Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydratlow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 31392014 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.3
Friday, 06 / 5 / 2015
Hyd. No. 51
ADO J
Hydrograph type
= Combine
Peak discharge
= 2.948 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.17 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 48,089 cuft
Inflow hyds.
= 28, 50
Contrib. drain. area
= 18.260 ac
Q (cfs)
3.00
1.00
0.00
0 4 8
Hyd No. 51
ADQ J
Hyd. No. 51 -- 2 Year
12 16 20
— Hyd No. 28
24 28 32
— Hyd No. 50
36 40 44
Q (cfs)
3.00
2.00
1.00
a 0.00
48
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 313020114 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3
Friday, 06 / 5 / 2016
Hyd. No. 53
ADQ K
Hydrograph type
= Combine
Peak discharge
= 3.131 cfs
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Time to peak
= 12.17 hrs
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 49,546 cuft
Inflow hyds.
= 29, 52
Contrib. drain. area
= 19.570 ac
Q (cfs)
4.00
3.00
M
1.00
0.00
0 4 8
Hyd No. 53
ADQ K
Hyd. No. 53 -- 2 Year
12 16 20
Hyd No. 29
24 28 32
— Hyd No. 52
36 40 44
Q (cfs)
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
Ma+- 0.00
48
Time (hrs)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D®2014 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.3 Friday, 06 / 5 / 2015
Hyd. No. 57
ADQ L
Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 26.93 cfs
Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 12.13 hrs
Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 263,920 cuft
Inflow hyds. = 33, 54, 55, 56 Contrib. drain. area = 71.660 ac
ADQ L
Q (Cfs) Hyd. No. 57 -- 2 Year Q (cfs)
28.00
28.00
24.00
24.00
20.00
20.00
16.00
16.00
12.00
12.00
8•00
8.00
4.00
4.00
0.00
0 4 8
— Hyd No. 57
12 16 20
—Hyd No. 33
— Hyd No. 56
24 28 32 36
—Hyd No. 54 —
0.00
40 44 48
Hyd No. 55 Time (hrs)
DRIVEWAY CULVERT DESIGN
Culvert Report
Hydratlow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jun 112015
Lot 5
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 526.00
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 15.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 0.00
Slope (%)
= 13.33
Qmax (cfs)
= 5.03
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 528.00
Tailwater Elev (ft)
_ (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 18.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 18.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 5.03
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 5.03
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 3.37
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 4.78
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
= 527.18
HGL Up (ft)
= 528.86
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 529.20
Top Elevation (ft)
= 530.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 0.80
Top Width (ft)
= 12.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
Elee (ft)
531.00
530.00
520.00
528.00
527.00
53.00
525A0
Lot s
H.Depth tro
i�
- cltuOr Lliee't HGL - EnEenIt
Reach i t)
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk®AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.
Lot 6
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 532.00
Pipe Length (ft)
= 15.00
Slope (%)
= 13.33
Invert Elev Up (ft)
534.00
Rise (in)
= 18.0
Shape
= Circular
Span (in)
= 18.0
No. Barrels
= 1
n-Value
= 0.012
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
Embankment
Top Elevation (ft)
= 536.00
Top Width (ft)
12.00
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
535.00
MOO
Calculations
Qmin (cfs)
Qmax (cfs)
Tailwater Elev (ft)
Highlighted
Qtotal (cfs)
Qpipe (cfs)
Qovertop (cfs)
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
HGL Dn (ft)
HGL Up (ft)
Hw Elev (ft)
Hw/D (ft)
Flow Regime
Thursday, Jun 112016
= 0.00
= 4.79
= (dc+D)/2
= 4.79
= 4.79
— 0.00
= 3.24
= 4.70
= 533.17
= 534.84
= 535.16
= 0.77
= Inlet Control
Hr DQO (ft)
0 2 d 6 a 10 12 14 16 10 20 M
GfmiOM n -HGL -Embank
0o
.00
.00
00
.00
00
- .aa
za
Ro L (fU
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3138 by Autodesk, Inc.
Lot 7
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 546.00
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 15.00
Qmin (cfs)
Slope (%)
= 13.33
Qmax (cfs)
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 548.00
Tailwater Elev (ft)
Rise (in)
= 18.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 18.0
Qtotal (cfs)
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
HGL Up (ft)
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
Top Elevation (ft)
= 550.00
Hw/D (ft)
Top Width (ft)
= 12.00
Flow Regime
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
El" (e)
551.00
550.00
sw.00
WAD
547AO
546.00
545.0u
Lot 7
Thursday, Jun 112015
= 0.00
= 4.51
= (dc+D)/2
= 4.51
= 4.51
= 0.00
= 3.08
= 4.60
= 547.16
= 548.81
= 549.11
= 0.74
= Inlet Control
FM+020 V*
CIRYIv Duly," - HGL - Embank
Reac (R)
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for AutodesM AutaCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Ina
Thursday, Jun 112015
Lot 8
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 560.25
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 15.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 0.00
Slope (%)
= 13.33
Qmax (cfs)
= 3.94
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 562.25
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 15.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 15.0
Qtotal (cfs)
3.94
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
3.94
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 3.65
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 4.73
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
561.28
HGL Up (ft)
563.05
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 563.42
Top Elevation (ft)
= 564.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 0.93
Top Width (ft)
= 12.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
Ebv(fo
565.00
564.00
S93.00
562 00
561.00
560.00
555.00
Lot a
HWo.ph(ro
2.73
_ v1
Cim2r ONeR HGL Embank
Reard(a)
1.75
0.75
-025
.1.25
-225
ass
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.
Lot 13
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 588.50
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 30.00
Qmin (cfs)
Slope (%)
= 3.33
Qmax (cfs)
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 589.50
Tailwater Elev (ft)
Rise (in)
= 24.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 24.0
Qtotal (cfs)
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
Culvert Type
= Circular Corrugate Metal Pipe
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
Culvert Entrance
= Projecting
Veloc Up (ft/s)
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.034, 1.5, 0.0553, 0.54, 0.9
HGL Dn (ft)
HGL Up (ft)
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
Top Elevation (ft)
= 592.00
Hw/D (ft)
Top Width (ft)
= 20.00
Flow Regime
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
Elw (M
593.00
592.00
391.00
590.00
589.00
588.00
58T.00
Lot 13
Thursday, Jun 112015
= 0.00
= 6.77
(dc+D)/2
= 6.77
= 6,77
= 0.00
= 2.75
4.79
= 589.96
= 590.42
= 590.87
= 0.69
= Inlet Control
w owm M
0 5 10 15 %L n au ao au ra au
arwlvculved - HGL Embank R."(M
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk®AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jun 112015
Lot 14
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 580.50
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 30.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 0.00
Slope (%)
= 3.33
Qmax (cfs)
= 7.21
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 581.50
Tailwater Elev (ft)
_ (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 24.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 24.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 7.21
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 7.21
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Corrugate Metal Pipe
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 2.90
Culvert Entrance
= Projecting
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 4.88
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.034, 1.5, 0.0553, 0.54, 0.9
HGL Dn (ft)
= 581.98
HGL Up (ft)
= 582.45
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 582.93
Top Elevation (ft)
= 584.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 0.72
Top Width (ft)
= 20.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
Ek (ft)
595.00
5".00
553.00
eea.55
551.00
580.00
5r3.00
Lot U
hM 040 n
3.50
2.50
1.50
0.50
aa0
450
,zm
00mia 0,Wn HGL Embank
Ruch (h)
w
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk®AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jun 112015
Lot 15
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 577.50
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 30.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 0.00
Slope (%)
= 3.33
Qmax (cfs)
= 7.57
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 578.50
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 24.0
Shape
Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
24.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 7.57
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 7.57
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Corrugate Metal Pipe
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 3.02
Culvert Entrance
= Projecting
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 4.96
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.034, 1.5, 0,0553, 0.54, 0.9
HGL Dn (ft)
= 578.99
HGL Up (ft)
= 579.48
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 579.98
Top Elevation (ft)
= 581.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 0.74
Top Width (ft)
= 20.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
El. (ft)
30200
5a1.00
500.00
570.00
57LOO
57r.00
576.00
m
Lot 15
AN DV& (r0
3.30
2.50
1.50
0.50
-0SO
4.50
-2.50
circular culve0 -HGLEmbank
Re (ft)
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk®AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jun 112015
Lot 16
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 569.50
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 30.00
Qmin (cfs)
0.00
Slope (%)
- 6.67
Qmax (cfs)
7.95
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 571.50
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 24.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 24.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 7.95
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 7.95
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Corrugate Metal Pipe
Veloc Dn (ft1s)
= 3.14
Culvert Entrance
= Projecting
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 5.04
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.034, 1.5, 0.0553, 0.54, 0.9
HGL Dn (ft)
= 571.00
HGL Up (ft)
= 572.50
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 572.99
Top Elevation (ft)
= 574.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 0.75
Top Width (ft)
= 20.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
10.00
Elcv(R)
5M.00
574.00
573.00
572.00
571.00
570.00
565.00
56800
Lot 16
HW DGO (ra
3.50
L50
1.50
0.50
.0.50
.1.50
aso
150
CeaIr CLWert XGL Embank
Wadi M
Culvert Report
Hydratlow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutOCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jun 112016
Lot 17
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 559.50
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
30.00
Qmin (cfs)
0.00
Slope (%)
= 6.67
Qmax (cfs)
= 8.36
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 561.50
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 24.0
Shape
Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 24.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 8.36
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 8.36
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Corrugate Metal Pipe
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 3.28
Culvert Entrance
= Projecting
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 5.13
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.034, 1.5, 0.0553, 0.54, 0.9
HGL Dn (ft)
= 561.01
HGL Up (ft)
= 562.53
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 563.05
Top Elevation (ft)
= 564.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 0.77
Top Width (ft)
= 20.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
Elev(fo
565.00
KIM
563.00
50200
56t00
560.00
MAO
550.00
Lot 17
HN Dom (fQ
350
L50
1.50
040
.0.50
-1.50
250
-&50
Circular GLWeR HGL Embank
Reaeh(M
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk@ AutoCAD® Civil 309 by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jun 112016
Lot 18
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 547.50
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 30.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 0.00
Slope (%)
= 6.67
Qmax (cfs)
= 9.31
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 549.50
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 24.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 24.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 9.31
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 9.31
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Corrugate Metal Pipe
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 3.58
Culvert Entrance
= Projecting
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 5.32
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.034, 1.5, 0.0553, 0.54, 0.9
HGL Dn (ft)
= 549.04
HGL Up (ft)
= 550.59
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 551.17
Top Elevation (ft)
= 552.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 0.83
Top Width (ft)
= 20.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
El. M)
553.00
552.00
551.00
550.00
509.00
sa5.00
547.00
569.00
Lot 18
CCulveR - HOL - Embank
R,04 l(it)
3.50
250
1.50
0.50
.0.50
AM
as0
Reach Oft)
Culvert Report
Hydrallow Express Extension for Autodesk®AutoGAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jun 112016
Lot 19
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 537.50
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 30.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 0.00
Slope (%)
= 6.67
Qmax (cfs)
- 9.62
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 539.50
Tailwater Elev (ft)
_ (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 24.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 24.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 9.62
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 9.62
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Corrugate Metal Pipe
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 3.67
Culvert Entrance
= Projecting
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 5.39
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.034, 1.5, 0.0553, 0.54, 0.9
HGL Dn (ft)
= 539.05
HGL Up (ft)
= 540.61
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 541.21
Top Elevation (ft)
= 542.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 0.85
Top Width (ft)
= 20.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
Elw (fq
Lot 19
Circuly CLWeR HGL - Embank
Ife Depth (1)
3.50
250
150
0.50
-950
-150
50
Reath (ft)
11
Culvert Report
Hydrallow Express Extension for Autodssk®AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jun 112016
Lot 20
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 531.50
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 30.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 0.00
Slope (%)
= 3.33
Qmax (cfs)
= 9.80
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 532.50
Tailwater Elev (ft)
_ (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 24.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 24.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 9.80
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 9.80
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Corrugate Metal Pipe
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 3.73
Culvert Entrance
= Projecting
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 5.42
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.034, 1.5, 0.0553, 0.54, 0.9
HGL Dn (ft)
= 533.06
HGL Up (ft)
= 533.62
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 534.27
Top Elevation (ft)
= 535.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 0.88
Top Width (ft)
= 20.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
Elw (ft)
Lot 20
IM 000 00
7 50
C 1.c*w HGL Eobank
R=*(ro
2.50
1.50
aso
4.50
t50
2.50
U
Culvert Report
Hydreflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jun 112015
Lot 23
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
527.00
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 15.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 0.00
Slope (%)
- 6.67
Qmax (cfs)
= 5.11
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 528.00
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 15.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 15.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 5.11
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 5.11
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 4.52
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Veloc Up (f /s)
= 5.30
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0,0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
= 528.08
HGL Up (ft)
= 528.92
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 529.49
Top Elevation (ft)
= 530.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 1.19
Top Width (ft)
= 12.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
10.00
EW (ft)
53100
530.00
529.00
M.00
52700
526.00
�1
Lot 23
Hw 000 (R)
QmJv[Llvart HGL Embank
R..h (ft)
3.00
2.00
100
0.00
4.M
.100
Culvert Report
HydraflowExpress Extension for Autodesk®AutoCAD® Civil 3D®byAutodesk, Inc.
Lot 24
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 546.25
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 15.00
Om in (cfs)
Slope (%)
= 13.33
Qmax (cfs)
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 548.25
Tailwater Elev (ft)
Rise (in)
= 15.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 15.0
Qtotal (cfs)
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
HGL Up (ft)
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
Top Elevation (ft)
550.00
Hw/D (ft)
Top Width (ft)
= 12.00
Flow Regime
Crest Width (ft)
10.00
L
Thursday, Jun 112015
= 0.00
= 4.49
= (dc+D)/2
= 4.49
= 4.49
= 0.00
= 4.07
= 5.00
= 547.30
= 549.11
= 549.54
= 1.04
= Inlet Control
HN Uaph ttc
MEE
0 2 4 6 6 10 12
(Snwim CLMrt HGL Embank
275
,.75
0.75
-0.25
-1.25
2.25
325
14 16 1s 20 22 24
Ruch (it)
0 2 4 6 6 10 12
(Snwim CLMrt HGL Embank
275
,.75
0.75
-0.25
-1.25
2.25
325
14 16 1s 20 22 24
Ruch (it)
Culvert Report
Hydreflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® CIAI 300 by Autodesk, Inc.
Lot 29
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
Pipe Length (ft)
Slope (%)
Invert Elev Up (ft)
Rise (in)
Shape
Span (in)
No. Barrels
n-Value
Culvert Type
Culvert Entrance
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
Embankment
Top Elevation (ft)
Top Width (ft)
Crest Width (ft)
Elu (t)
525.00
526.00
023.00
522.00
021.00
020.00
010.00
= 620.00
Calculations
= 30.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 6.67
Qmax (cfs)
= 622.00
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= 18.0
= Circular
Highlighted
18.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= Circular Corrugate Metal Pipe
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= Projecting
Veloc Up (fUs)
= 0.034, 1.5, 0.0553, 0.54, 0.9
HGL Dn (ft)
HGL Up (ft)
Hw Elev (ft)
= 624.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 20.00
Flow Regime
= 10.00
Let 20
cimularculve0 HGL - Embank
Thursday, Jun 112015
= 0.00
= 5.53
= (dc+D)/2
= 5.53
= 5.53
= 0.00
= 3.64
= 4.96
= 621.20
= 622.91
= 623.45
= 0.96
= Inlet Control
HwVspMfPo
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
-1.00
zoo
4.00
Rush (ft)
Culvert Report
Hydreflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.
Lot 30
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
Pipe Length (ft)
Slope (%)
Invert Elev Up (ft)
Rise (in)
Shape
Span (in)
No. Barrels
n-Value
Culvert Type
Culvert Entrance
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
Embankment
Top Elevation (ft)
Top Width (ft)
Crest Width (ft)
Elev (ft)
630.00
= 30.00
= 6.67
= 632.00
= 18.0
= Circular
= 18.0
=1
= 0.012
= Circular Corrugate Metal Pipe
= Projecting
= 0.034, 1.5, 0.0553, 0.54, 0.9
= 634.00
= 20.00
= 10.00
L.ot 30
Calculations
Qmin (cfs)
Qmax (cfs)
Tailwater Elev (ft)
Highlighted
Qtotal (cfs)
Qpipe (cfs)
Qovertop (cfs)
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
HGL Dn (ft)
HGL Up (ft)
Hw Elev (ft)
Hw/D (ft)
Flow Regime
Thursday, Jun 112016
= 0.00
= 5.19
= (dc+D)/2
= 5.19
= 5.19
= 0.00
= 3.46
= 4.84
= 631.19
= 632.88
= 633.38
= 0.92
= Inlet Control
Woeph (IV
300
..�
.
w
a iu � ru ea Ju is as as
Qmiv CLlvart - HGL Embank
2.00
1.00
0.00
•1.00
-2.00
-100
50
Reach (0)
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3130 by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jun 112015
Lot 31
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 637.00
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 15.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 0.00
Slope (%)
= 6.67
Qmax (cfs)
= 3.58
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 638.00
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 15.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 15.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 3.58
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 3.58
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 3.38
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 4.56
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
638.01
HGL Up (ft)
= 638.76
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
639.13
Top Elevation (ft)
= 640.00
Hw/D (ft)
0.90
Top Width (ft)
= 12.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
Elev (In
661.00
640.00
639.00
636.00
637.00
636.00
L
Lot 31
- Ca' WrWvert - HM Em k
MW Depth (ft)
3.00
2.00
1.00
too
4-00
4.00
Reach (1t)
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk®AutoCAD® Civil 300 by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jun 112016
Lot 52
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 550.25
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 15.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 0.00
Slope (%)
= 13.33
Qmax (cfs)
4.35
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 552.25
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 15.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 15.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 4.35
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 4.35
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 3.96
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 4.93
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
= 551.30
HGL Up (ft)
= 553.09
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 553.51
Top Elevation (ft)
= 554.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 1.01
Top Width (ft)
= 12.00
Flow Regime
Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
Elev (ft)
moo
550.00
553.00
s5z.00
551.00
350.00
WAG
LL
Lot 62
Hw Depth (N
2.75
a n o N II 14 lfi 15 20 a 24
Qralar CuWerI HGL Eiebank
ReaM (ft)
135
0.75
.0.25
4.25
4.25
IM
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk Inc.
Lot 53
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 536.00
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
15.00
Qmin (cfs)
Slope (%)
13.33
Qmax (cfs)
Invert Elev Up (ft)
538.00
Tailwater Elev (ft)
Rise (in)
= 18.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 18.0
Qtotal (cfs)
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
HGL Up (ft)
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
Top Elevation (ft)
= 540.00
Hw/D (ft)
Top Width (ft)
= 12.00
Flow Regime
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
L
Thursday, Jun 112016
= 0.00
= 6.36
= (dc+D)/2
= 6.36
= 6.36
= 0.00
= 4.08
= 5.24
= 537.24
= 538.97
= 539.43
0.95
Inlet Control
200
1.00
0.00
4.00
-z00
-3 M
2 < 6 0 10 R 16 16 16 20 22 U
circularCulvert NCi Embank
Mach (fo
L
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3138 by Autodesk, Inc.
Thursday, Jun 112016
Lot 54
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 526.00
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 15.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 0.00
Slope (%)
= 13.33
Qmax (cfs)
= 7.09
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 528.00
Tailwater Elev (ft)
_ (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 18.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 18.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 7.09
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 7.09
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 4.46
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 5.48
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
= 527.27
HGL Up (ft)
= 529.03
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 529.55
Top Elevation (ft)
= 530.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 1.04
Top Width (ft)
= 12.00
Flow Regime
= inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
M
1.00
DAD
•1.00
�w
SAY
8 10 U 1! 16 16 20 M 24
-G .CuWd HGL Embank
Ruch (fl)
11
J
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodeske AutaCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jun 112015
Lot 55
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 517.00
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
15.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 0.00
Slope (%)
= 3.33
Qmax (cfs)
= 7.78
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 517.50
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 24.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 24.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 7.78
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 7.78
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 3.09
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 5.01
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0,0398, 0,67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
= 518.50
HGL Up (ft)
= 518.49
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 518.91
Top Elevation (ft)
520.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 0.70
Top Width (ft)
12.00
Flow Regime
Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
E-k�(a)
521.00
520.00
519.00
518.00
517.00
516.00
La as
- a.I.CuWn - HGL - Em k
ft Deppt (iy
150
2.50
1.50
0.50
-0SO
4M
Ruch (fQ
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jun 112015
Lot 59
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 522.00
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 15.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 0.00
Slope (%)
= 13.33
Qmax (cfs)
= 5.08
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 524.00
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 15.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 15.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 5.08
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 5.08
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 4.50
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 5.29
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
= 523.08
HGL Up (ft)
= 524.91
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 525.44
Top Elevation (ft)
= 526.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 1.15
Top Width (ft)
= 12.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
Ebn (M
527.00
526.00
525.00
5N.00
523.00
522.00
521.00
L.
Lot as
MEN
2.00
1.00
0.00
4.00
-200
0 2 d fi 0 10 12 M ifi 10 20 22 2d 300
cml.0 Wft HM Embank
Ruch (0(
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for AutadesM Aut6CAIM Civil 3D® by Autodask, Inc
Lot 62
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
516.00
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
15.00
Qmin (cis)
Slope (%)
13.33
Qmax (cfs)
Invert Elev Up (ft)
518.00
Tailwater Elev (ft)
Rise (in)
18.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 18.0
Qtotal (cfs)
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
HGL Up (ft)
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
Top Elevation (ft)
520.00
Hw/D (ft)
Top Width (ft)
= 12.00
Flow Regime
Crest Width (ft)
10.00
Ekv (M) Lot 62
52100
520.00
519.00
518.00
517.00
516.00
51500
Thursday, Jun 112016
= 0.00
= 6.22
= (dc+D)/2
= 6.22
= 6.22
= 0.00
= 4.01
= 5.19
= 517.23
= 518.96
= 519.40
= 0.94
= Inlet Control
M. O"M (M
Nor
SIMON
M®�
12 14 15 18 20 22 24
aw:apart HGL - Embank
Rauh (ft)
5.00
2.00
1.00
9.00
•1.00
-2.00
JAO
L.
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jun 112016
Lot 63
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 521.25
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 15.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 0.00
Slope (%)
= 6.67
Qmax (Cfs)
= 4.22
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 522.25
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 15.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 15.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 4.22
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 4.22
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 3.87
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 4.87
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
= 522.29
HGL Up (ft)
= 523.08
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 523.52
Top Elevation (ft)
= 524.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 1.02
Top Width (ft)
= 12.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
Elev (ft)
525.00
524.00
523.00
522,00
521.00
520.00
Lot 03
RN D*M (ft1
2.75
1.75
0.75
-025
-IM
15
a.[. c&.d -fIOL Embnt
R.uh (ft)
J
Culvert Report
Hydrafiow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® CIA 308 by Autodeak, Inc. Thursday, Jun 112016
Lot 69
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 486.00
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 15.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 0.00
Slope (%)
= 1.67
Qmax (cfs)
= 2.82
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 486.25
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 15.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 15.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 2.82
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 2.82
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (f /s)
= 2.78
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 4.18
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
486.96
HGL Up (ft)
= 486.92
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 487.24
Top Elevation (ft)
= 488.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 0.79
Top Width (ft)
12.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
EW (0)
419.00
480.50
468.00
407.50
487.00
486.50
486.00
405.50'
Lot 69
!Mu D401M (f0
2.75
Ly
ll�-
ITIIIIIIIIII���OO��T��'
I�llllllll��
Gi=lw Culvert Embank
2.25
1.75
1.25
0.75
cis
Q]5
a 7s
Culvert Report
Hydrallow Express Extension for Autodesk®AuteCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jun 112015
Lot 92
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 452.25
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 15.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 0.00
Slope (%)
= 6.67
Qmax (cfs)
= 3.74
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 453.25
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 15.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 15.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 3.74
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 3.74
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 3.50
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 4.64
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
= 453.27
HGL Up (ft)
= 454.03
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 454.41
Top Elevation (ft)
= 455.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 0.93
Top Width (ft)
= 12.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
- 10.00
E[w lPo
e55.00
455.00
454.00
45100
45200
451.00
Lot 92
HW owsl IN
V5
1.75
0.75
-0.75
4M
4M
Gala CLIVM -HGL - Ertank
Rauh (M
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jun 112015
Lot 93
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 452.00
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 15.00
Qmin (cis)
= 0.00
Slope (%)
= 6.67
Qmax (cfs)
= 6.79
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 453.00
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 18.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 18.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 6.79
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 6.79
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 4.30
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 5.38
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
= 453.25
HGL Up (ft)
= 454.01
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 454.55
Top Elevation (ft)
= 455.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 1.03
Top Width (ft)
= 12.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
El. (ft)
455A0
455.00
454.00
453.00
45200
451A0
Lot 93
cimulnculvert - HM - Embank
H4 Depth (N
3.00
2.00
1A0
4.00
4-00
-z59
Reeek (m
I✓
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk®AutoCADOD Civil 3138 by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jun 112015
Lot 94
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 464.00
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 15.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 0.00
Slope (%)
13.33
Qmax (cfs)
= 5.86
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 466.00
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 18.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 18.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 5.86
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 5.86
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 3.82
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 5.07
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
465.22
HGL Up (ft)
= 466.93
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 467.34
Top Elevation (ft)
= 468.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 0.89
Top Width (ft)
= 12,00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
Elev (ft)
4 .00
460.00
467.00
436.00
485.00
464.00
"3.00
J
Lot 04
Hr 040 04
3.00
2.00
1.00
too
4.00
-zoo
am
Camtlmckda HGL Embank
Reach (1q
J
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk®AutaCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jun 112015
Lot 95
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 478.00
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 15.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 0.00
Slope (%)
13.33
Qmax (cfs)
= 5.13
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 480.00
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 18.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 18.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 5.13
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 5.13
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 3.42
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 4.82
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
= 479.19
HGL Up (ft)
= 480.87
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 481.21
Top Elevation (ft)
= 482.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 0.81
Top Width (ft)
= 12.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
10.00
Elev (ft)
483.00
4az00
411.00
480.00
47100
478.00
477..00
a�na<c�m.rt�
Lot 96
11. D"M M
- 3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
-1.00
a00
-3.00
fi 8 10 n 14 16 10 20 n 24
Embank
Rna (ft)
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 308 by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jun 112018
Lot 96
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 492.25
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 15.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 0.00
Slope (%)
= 13.33
Qmax (cfs)
= 1.35
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 494.25
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 15.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 15.0
QtotaI (cfs)
= 1.36
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 1.35
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 1.51
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 3.31
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
= 493.10
HGL Up (ft)
= 494.71
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 494.81
Top Elevation (ft)
= 496.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 0.45
Top Width (ft)
12.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
Ei v(ft)
Lot 96
"NO40 (ft)
175
f!
Rd..alven Em . k
Rweh (M
1.75
0.75
-0.25
.1.75
-225
ass
DROP INLET HAND COMPUTATIONS
Chapter 9 — Storm Drains
Appendix 9C-13 Performance Curve 13I-1 in a Sump
10 rz
5.
H
LL
0.5
0,1
MEMO
M
moll�
Moll
.
I����
-_Mwm
■■r--����■■
--Mmmm■■�I--���■■
M■■■■F4�����■■■■
�=B■■■/,IN
�M
■■■
MINIOPP42111111111=111
1 5
Qlo: O.�S CFS
10
DISCHARGE (CFS)
S+r%c.Akr e 3
Source: VDOT Transportation Research Council publication "HYDRAULIC
EFFICIENCY OF GRATE INLET', 1988
50 1100
1 of 1 VDOT Drainage Manual
Chapter 9 —Storm Drains
Appendix 9C-13 Performance Curve 13I-1 in a Sump
10.
LL
L �.
w
0.5
d :O.11'
01
l�il.i.•�i•�•
Ir.•rf
MEMO
M■■■■MOFAMMMM�WMM����■
' 11
1 d,. - 1.33 US i o 50 11:i
DISCHARGE (CFS)
StriAocu,cc 3 A
Source: VDOT Transportation Research Council publication "HYDRAULIC
EFFICIENCY OF GRATE INLET'+. 1988
1 of 1 VDOT Drainage Manual
Chapter 9 - storm grains
Appendix 9C-14 Performance Curve 13I-7 in a Sump
p
F-
L_
w d:d01
gS
a
0.5
NM
�■llllll■■■llll■�■■■■Il��
■w��lllllll■lll■■1■■■■
5 10 \Ol.1.y05C.Fg 100
zln
DISCHARGE (CFS)
5+rwLtyrl. 4
Source: VDOT Transportation Research Council publication "HYDRAULIC
EFFICIENCY OF GRATE INLET", 1988
1 of 1 VDOT Drainage Manual
Chapter 9 — Storm Drains
Appendix 9C-14 Performance Curve DI-7 in a Sump
I FA
�����■■■■���[I
■■■VAN
all
�iC�'I2d�
III���������
1 5 L 10 50 100
Q19
= 1.31 CCS
DISCHARGE (CFS)
Source: VDOT Transportation Research Council publication "HYDRAULIC
EFFICIENCY OF GRATE INLET', 1988
1 of 1 VDOT Drainage Manual
Chapter 9 — Storm Drains
Appendix 9C-14 Performance Curve DI-7 in a Sump
L-
LL
Ei d-o1:
0.5
milli
5 1kQI =It.33 CFS0 100
DISCHARGE (CFS)
51 roAc.+uto. I
Source: VDOT Transportation Research Council publication "HYDRAULIC
EFFICIENCY OF GRATE INLET', 1988
101 VDOT Drainage Manual
Chapter 9 — Storm Drains
Appendix 9C-13 Performance Curve 13I-1 in a Sump
i3 4 1
WAM
■■■■MEMO
■1
' .■■■■■■1
---d■■■..�-------
low
1111ME
10 50 ii_o
DISCHARGE (EFS )
Strwc-+u re I I
Source: VDOT Transportation Research Council publication "HYDRAULIC
EFFICIENCY OF GRATE INLET', 1988
1011 VDOT Drainage Manual
Chapter 9 — Storm Drains
Appendix 9C-13 Performance Curve DI-1 in a Sump
H
LL
10.
5.P
Pa . 5
0. 1
�Iiiiiiiillll�lllll�Il�i■■■■■aiiiiii��I��■■■
AMM�����
nmul1-_=Mm
WEEP,
111111111111110
1
®
90•
��
Q16= 1 •3to 1Clio
cFs
DISCHARGE (CFS)
5•tC1A0-+%AV-t 11
Source: VDOT Transportation Research Council publication "HYDRAULIC
EFFICIENCY OF GRATE INLET", 1988
1 of 1 VDOT Drainage Manual
Chapter 9 - Storm Drains
Appendix 9C-13 Performance Curve DI-1 in a Sump
L
F--
L
W
u
0
E
1.0
P.F,
d = 0.7,41
0. 1
WIMMEN
������
1FAMON
W■■MEE
II������■■
MENZ
NOUN
1 ` 5 iL71 G too
Q� = l ,LFs
DISCHARGE fCFSi
S t-r-kAL*A" 101
Source: VDOT Transportation Research Council publication "HYDRAULIC
EFFICIENCY OF GRATE INLET", 1988
1 of 1 VDOT Drainage Manual
Chapter 9 — Storm Drains
Appendix 9C-13 Performance Curve DI-1 in a Sump
I0.
5.
H
LL
1
i— laO
L
W
U
k=I
���
■■■■■
aIIIIII�II�I��■■■
3.2.1 c.F s
DISCHARGE ICF—S
S-1 1r%k c,+% re MA
Source: VDOT Transportation Research Council publication "HYDRAULIC
EFFICIENCY OF GRATE INLET", 1988
1 of 1 VDOT Drainage Manual
Chapter 9 — Storm Drains
Appendix 9C-14 Performance Curve DI-7 in a Sump
5.12
LL
d _ o A110
0.1
r
e®�
1 Z 5 10 50 100
-alIGFs
DISCHARGE (CFS)
.5krKcf Arc It
Source: VDOT Transportation Research Council publication "HYDRAULIC
EFFICIENCY OF GRATE INLET', 1988
1 of 1 VDOT Drainage Manual
Chapter 9—Storm Drains
Appendix 9C-14 Performance Curve 13I-7 in a Sump
ri 4
5.1?
a
1.0
W
a
0.1
�■■■■�Ili��i■■��III
r
�R����III�■■■■�111
111111;1e=01111111
• - . .,
1 T 5 10 50 100.
010= 3.00 CPS
DISCHARGE (CFS)
S4-r%k , l,re l9
Source: VDOT Transportation Research Council publication "HYDRAULIC
EFFICIENCY OF GRATE INLET-, 1988
1 of 1 VDOT Drainage Manual
Chapter 9 - Storm Drains
Appendix 9C-14 Performance Curve DI-7 in a Sump
W
0.5
0.1
������■■■�liiiiii�iii�ra��■r�■
�Mm
NOIll��i�■�����
I
Emma
E11111111M®M1111111
. ..:
5 10101• = CF50 S 100
DISCHARGE (CFS)
S} r M.c.k,Ar c a5
Source: VDOT Transportation Research Council publication "HYDRAULIC
EFFICIENCY OF GRATE INLET', 1988
1 of 1 VDOT Drainage Manua/
Chapter 9 — Storm Drains
Appendix 9C-13 Performance Curve DI-1 in a Sump
10.
5.
L
1.0
L
W
u
0.5
d,o.Zs'
0< 1
■■■■■■■■®ram■■■■■■
■■■■■1
,■■■■■11
---�.�.11r,1111111
'GIs = 1.1 t CFS
DISCHARGE (CFS)
Str%4,rtu« 3;.
Source: VDOT Transportation Research Council publication "HYDRAULIC
EFFICIENCY OF GRATE INLET", 1988
1 of 1 VDOT Drainage Manual
Chapter 9 — Storm Drains
Appendix 9C-13 Performance Curve DI-1 in a Sump
I
mimn01lii
IN�01111
�Ell
�1V,/11111=E0�����
L 5 iL71 50 1r
Qto= 2.116 CFS
DISCHARGE (CFS)
5{ru%&tLArv- 33
Source: VDOT Transportation Research Council publication "HYDRAULIC
EFFICIENCY OF GRATE INLET", 1988
1 of 1 VDOT Drainage Manual
Chapter 9— Storm Drains
Appendix 9C-13 Performance Curve 13I-1 in a Sump
'0.
5. IF
v.5
d,o.%,4.
0i 1
i�iiiTiii■
. . . 4 is
! 5 io 50 I 2/10
Ole L 0.W
kit. I.otrs DISCHARGE (CF4 )
S tr-..&twre 34 R
Source: VDOT Transportation Research Council publication "HYDRAULIC
EFFICIENCY OF GRATE INLET", 1988
1 of 1 VDOT Drainage Manual
SEDIMENT BASIN DESIGN WORKSHEETS
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN
PROJECT
WHITTINGTON
PROJ NO.
13.0039
BASIN #
SEDIMENT
BASIN SB-1
DATE
6/2/2015
LOCATION
BY
DEG
INPUT
DRAINAGE AREA
13.07
ac
BASIN VOLUME DESIGN
WET STORAGE
1. MINIMUM REQUIRED VOLUME
875.69
c
2. AVAILABLE BASIN VOLUME
AVERAGE
END AREA - BASIN VOLUME
ESTIMATES
ELEVATION
AREA
VOLUME
VOLUME
TOTAL
ft
of
ct
cy
cy
471.99
1 0.00
80.03
2.22
472
12,007.00
2.22
33,793.75
1,251.82
474.5
15,026.00
1,253.84
28,884.00
1,069.78
476
23,484.00
2,323.62
50,109.00
1,855.89
478
26,625.00
4,179.51
56,498.00
2,092.52
480
29,873.00
6,272.03
66,650.00
2,427.78
482
36,677.00
8,699.81
72,367.00
2,680.26
484
36,690.00
11,380.07
REQUIRED WET STORAGE
VOLUME
875.69
cy
APPROX. ELEVATION
471.80'
3. EXCAVATE CUBIC YARDS
4. AVAILABLE VOLUME BEFORE CLEANOUT
REQUIRED
446.51
c
5. ELEVATION CORRESPONDING TO CLEANOUT
LEVEL
474.00'
S. DISTANCE FROM DEWATERING ORIFICE
TO C/O LEVEL
1
INVERT DEWATERING ORIFICE
R'QD
471.80
INVERT DEWATERING ORIFICE
USED
476.00
APPROX. VOLUME AT INVERT
USED
2323.00 1
cy
DISTANCE FROM INVERT
TO CIO LEVEL
2.001ft
DISTANCE ACCEPTABLE
WET STORAGE VOLUME ACCEPTABLE
DRYSTORAGE
7. MINIMUM REQUIRED VOLUME
1
875.69
S. TOTAL AVAILABLE VOLUME AT CREST OF RISER
CREST OF RISER
480.60
APPROX. AVAILABLE TOTAL VOLUME
7432.00
cy
ADEQUATE DRY STORAGE VOLUME
9. DIAMETER OF DEWATERING
ORIFICE
Q
112,08
efa
tl
9.27
in
USE d
3
in
10. DIAMETER OF FLEXIBLE
TUBING
Slin
STANDARD SIZE
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
11. PRELIMINARY DESIGN ELEVATIONS:
CREST
OF RISER
480.60 It
TOP
OF DAM
484.00
ft
DESIGN HIGH
WATER
481.38
ft 'design
of hi h water assumes a peak 8owrate
UPSTREAM TOE
OF DAM;
472.00
ft
of 7.8 cfs storage volume is not considered.
Page 1 WHITTINGTONSB1.As
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN
PROJECT
WHITTINGTON'
PROJ NO.
13.0039
BASIN #
SEDIMENT
BASIN SB-1
DATE
6122015
LOCATION
BY
DEG
BASIN SHAPE
12. LENGTH OF FLOW / EFFECTIVE
WIDTH:
SURFACE AREA OF NORMAL POOLI
23484,sf
LENGTH OF FLOW PATH'
245
ft
EFFECTIVE WIDTH'
80
Ift
LIWe
3.06.
Baffles Not Required
RUNOFF
(RATIONAL METHOD CALCULATION)
USE MAXIMUM C VALUE DURING CONSTRUCTION
AND
MINIMUM To VALUE
13. FLOW FROM 2-YEAR STORM
C:
1
0.60
Tc:
32.3 1:1
3.4
In/hr
Q.
1 26.7
Cfs
14. FLOW FROM
25-YEAR STORM
C:
1 0.60
Tc: 32.31 1:1
5.5
lnihr
Q=
43.1
oft
PRINCIPAL SPILLWAY DESIGN
15. REQUIRED SPILLWAY CAPACITY:
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY? YIN)
REQUIRED SPILLWAY CAPACITY:
I 16.5
CFS
16. ASSUMED AVAILABLE HEAD:
ELEV. OF CREST OF E.S. IF USED:
1 481.70
ASSUMED AVAILABLE HEAD=
1.00
ft
17. RISER DIMENSIONS:
RISER DIAMETER:
48.00
In
From Plate 3.14-8 or Calm
ACTUAL MAX. ELEV.:
478.70
ft
(From Calm [f a ro riate)
ACTUAL HEAD:
0.80
ft
(From Plate 3.14-8 or Calcs)
18. BARREL LENGTH:
BARREL LENGTH:
47.00
ft
BARREL INVERT OUT:
475.50
ft
HEAD H ON BARREL:
3.20
ft
IF Plate 3.14-7
19. BARREL DIAMETER:
BARREL DIAMETER:
24
in
From Plate 3.14A or
3.14E
20. TRASH RACK AND ANTI -VORTEX DEVICE:
DIAMETER: 1
72
in
(From Plate 3.140) 1
'
HEIGHT:
21
in
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY DESIGN
21. REQUIRED SPILLWAY CAPACITY:
Qe = Q 25 -0
16.5
CFS
22. DIMENSIONS:
BOTTOM WIDTH (b): 1
12.00
ft
SLOPE OF EXIT CHANNEL (a):
3.40
ft/ft
MIN. LENGTH EXIT CHANNEL x :
44.00
ft
ANT14EEPC LLAR DESIGN
tPlate3.14-11)
23. DIMENSIONS:
DEPTH WATER CREST OF P.S.
8.60
ft
SLOPE UPSTREAM FACE DAM Z :
2.00
:1
SLOPE P.S. BARREL Sb :
1.06'
%
LENGTH BARREL IN SAT. ZONE (Ls):
35.00ft
(From
FINAL DESIGN ELEVATIONS
26. ELEVATIONS:
TOP OF DAM:
484.00
ft
DESIGN HIGH WATER:
481.38
ft
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY CREST:
481.70
ft
PRINCIPAL SPILLWAY CREST:
ft 480.60'
DE WATERING ORIFICE INVERT:
476.00 ft
CLEANOUT ELEVATION:
474.001ft
Page 2 WHITTINGTONSB1.xls
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN
WHITTINGTON
PROJ NO.
13.0039
SEDIMENT
BASIN SB-2
.DATE
6/212015
ABASJN#
BY
DEG
DRAINAGEAREA
12.84
ac
BASIN VOLUME DESIGN
WET STORAGE
1. MINIMUM REQUIRED VOLUME
-860.28
c
2. AVAILABLE BASIN VOLUME
AVERAGE
END AREA - BASIN VOLUME
ESTIMATES
ELEVATION
AREA
VOLUME
F VOLUME
I TOTAL
ft
sf
cf
cy
cy
495.99
1.00
1
46.45
1.72
496
9,290.00
1.72
25,630.00
949.26
498.5
11,214.001
960.98
20,105.25
744.64
Soo
15,593.00
1,695.62
33,140.00
1,221.41
502
17,647.00
2,923.03
37,185.00
1,376.48
504
19,618.00
4.299.51
41,424.00
1,634.22
506
21,806.00
5,833.77
45,914.00
1,700.52
_ 508
24,108.00
7,534. 55
33,537.73
1,242.14
510
9,429.73
i
8,776.39
REQUIRED WET
STORAGE
VOLUME
I860.28
APPROX. ELEVATION
600.0�_
3. EXCAVATE CUBIC YARDS
4. AVAILABLE VOLUME BEFORE
CLEAN OUT REQUIRED
423.72
S. ELEVATION
CORRESPONDING
TO CLEANOUT LEVEL
498.00
6. DISTANCE
FROM DEWATERING ORIFICE TO C/O LEVEL
INVERT DEWATERING ORIFICE R'QD 1
0
INVERT DEWATERING ORIFICE USED
500.001
APPROX. VOLUME AT INVERT USED
1695.62
cy
DISTANCE FROM INVERT TO C/O LEVEL
2.00.ft
DISTANCE ACCEPTABLE'
WET STORAGE VOLUME ACCEPTABLE
DRYSTORAGE
7. MINIMUM REQUIRED
VOLUME
860.28
cy
S. TOTAL AVAILABLE
VOLUME AT CREST OF RISER
CREST OF RISER
506.80
APPROX. AVAILABLE TOTAL VOLUME
6210.37
cy
ADEQUATE DRY STORAGE VOLUME
9. DIAMETER OF DEWATERING ORIFICE
Q
6.67
cfs
d
3.00 In
USE d
3 in
10. DIAMETER
OF FLEXIBLE TUBING
6 in
STANDARD SIZE
PRELIMINARY
DESIGN
11. PRELIMINARY DESIGN ELEVATIONS:
CREST OF RISER
506.80'ift
TOP OF DAM 1
509.00 It
DESIGN HIGH WATER 1
507.28 ft
*design
of high water assumes a peak flowrate
UPSTREAM TOE OF DAM 1
496.00 ft
Page 1 WHITTINGTON-SB1.Ids
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN
I
I
PROJECT
WHITTINGTON
jPROJ NO.
13.0039
BASIN #
SEDIMENT BASIN SB-2
' DATE
1 6/2/2015
LOCATION
BY
DEG
BASIN SHAPE
12. LENGTH OF FLOW / EFFECTIVE
WIDTH:
SURFACE AREA OF NORMAL
POOLI 1551
LENGTH OF
FLOW PATH 137
ft
EFFECTIVE WIDTH! 104
R
L/Wej 1.32
1 BAFFLES REQUIRED
RUNOFF
RATIONAL METHOD
CALCULATION
USE MAXIMUM
C VALUE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND
MINIMUM Tc VALUE
13. FLOW FROM 2-YEAR STORM
C:
0.60
Tc: 27.1 I:
3.4
in/hr
Q1
26.2cfs
14. FLOW FROM 25-YEAR STORM
C:1
i
0.60
To: 27.1 I:
5.5
in/hr
Q=
42.4,cfs
PRINCIPAL SPILLWAY DESIGN
15. REQUIRED SPILLWAY CAPACITY:
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY? (Y/N)
Y
j
REQUIRED SPILLWAY CAPACITY:
16.21CFS
16. ASSUMED AVAILABLE HEAD:
ELEV. OF CREST OF E.S. IF USED;[
607.801
ASSUMED AVAILABLE HEAD='
1.00ft
17. RISER DIMENSIONS:
RISER DIAMETER:
1 48.00
in
(From Plate 3.14-8 or Cal
ACTUAL MAX. ELEV:
606.80
ft
(From Calm if appropriate)
ACTUAL HEAD:
0.00
ft
From Plate 3.14-8 or Calcs)
18. BARREL LENGTH:
BARREL LENGTH:,
60.00
ft
BARREL INVERT OUT:I
499.111
HEAD H ON BARREL:I 7.30'
(From Plate 3.147
19. BARREL DIAMETER:
BARREL DIAMETER: 24'
In
From Plate 3.14A or
3.14B
20. TRASH RACK AND ANTI -VORTEX DEVICE:
DIAMETER:
72IIn
(From Plate 3.14D
HEIGHT:
21
in
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY DESIGN
21. REQUIRED SPILLWAY CAPACITY:
Qe=Q25-Q =
16.2CFS
22. DIMENSIONS:
BOTTOM WIDTH (b):
8.00 ft
From Table 3.14-C)
SLOPE OF EXIT CHANNEL (a):
3.10 ft/ft
From Table 3.14-C)
MIN. LENGTH EXIT CHANNEL x :
51.00
R
From Table 3.14-C)
ANTI• EEP COLLAR DESIGN
23. DIMENSIONS:
DEPTH WATER @ CREST OF P.S. Y :
10.80 ft
SLOPE UPSTREAM FACE DAM
2.00 :1
SLOPE P.S. BARREL (Sb):
0.83
%
LENGTH BARREL IN SAT. ZONE (Ls): I
60.00 ft
(From
Plate 3.14-11
FINAL DESIGN ELEVATIONS
25. ELEVATIONS:
TOP OF DAM:
609.00 It
DESIGN HIGH WATER:
507.28 ft
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY CREST:
507.80 ft
PRINCIPAL SPILLWAY CREST:
.50
DEWATERING ORIFICE INVERT:
500.00ft
CLEANOUT ELEVATION:
498.00 ift
Page 2 WHITTINGTONSB1.xls
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN
PROJECT
WHITTINGTON
I
IPROJ NO.
13.0039
BASIN #
SEDIMENT
BASIN SB-3
JDATE
I 6/2/2015
LOCATION
BY
DEG
INPUT
DRAINAGE AREA
11.59
ac
BASIN VOLUME
DESIGN
WETSTORAGE
1. MINIMUM
REQUIRED VOLUME
776.63
cY
2. AVAILABLE
BASIN VOLUME
AVERAGE
END AREA - BASIN VOLUME
ESTIMATES
ELEVATION
I AREA
VOLUME
VOLUME
TOTAL
ft
I sf
cf
cY
:y
629.99
0.00
38.81
1.44
630
7,763.00
1.44
16,684.00
617.93
632
8,921.00
619.36
25,483.75
943.84
534.5
11,466.00
1,563.21
23,030.25
852.97
536
19,241.00
2,416.18
41,191.00
1,525.69
_
638
21,950.00
3,941.77
22,466.50
832.09
539
22,983.00
4,773.86
23,866.00
883.93
540
1 24,749.00
1
6,657.79
REQUIRED WET STORAGE
VOLUME
776.53
cy
APPROX. ELEVATION
1
532.00
3. EXCAVATE CUBIC YARDS
4. AVAILABLE VOLUME BEFORE CLEANOUT
REQUIRED
382.47icy
5. ELEVATION CORRESPONDING TO CLEANOUT
LEVEL
532.50
6. DISTANCE FROM DEWATERING ORIFICE
TO C/O LEVEL
0.80
'INVERT DEWATERING ORIFICE
R'QD
_
633.00
INVERT DEWATERING ORIFICE
USED 1
535.00
APPROX. VOLUME AT INVERT
USED
1825.60
DISTANCE FROM INVERT
TO C/O LEVEL
2.50
ft
DISTANCE ACCEPTABLE
WET STORAGE VOLUME ACCEPTABLE
-
DRY STORAGE
7. MINIMUM REQUIRED VOLUME
776.53
c
S. TOTAL AVAILABLE VOLUME AT CREST OF RISER
CREST OF RISER
537.00
APPROX. AVAILABLE TOTAL VOLUME
DRY
STORAGE VOLUME
9. DIAMETER OF DEWATERING
ORIFICE
Qcfsd
k3307.75ADEQUATE
inUSE
d
in
10. DIAMETER OF FLEXIBLE
TUBING
6 In
STANDARD SIZE
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
11. PRELIMINARY DESIGN ELEVATIONS:
CREST
OF RISER
537.00A
TOP
OF DAM
S40.00"ft
DESIGN HIGH
WATER'
538.84.ft `design
of high water assumes a peak 0owmte
UPSTREAM TOE
OF DAM
530.00!ft I
of 7.8 cfs store a volume is not considered.
Page 1 WHITTINGTONSB1.XIs
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN
PROJECT
WHITTINGTON
PROD NO.
13.0039
BASIN #
SEDIMENT BASIN SB-3
DATE
6/2/2015
LOCATION
BY
I DEG
BASIN SHAPE
12. LENGTH OF FLOW / EFFECTIVE
WIDTH:
SURFACE AREA OF NORMAL POOLI
13568
sf
LENGTH OF FLOW PATH!
217
ft
EFFECTIVE WIDTH
SO,R
LIWe
4.34
Baffles Not Required
RUNOFF
RATIONAL METHOD CALCULATION)
USE MAXIMUM C VALUE DURING CONSTRUCTION
AND
MINIMUM To VALUE
13. FLOW FROM 2-YEAR STORM
C;l
0.60'
Tc:
15.0 I:
3.4
in/hr
Q=
2
CIS
14. FLOW FROM
25-YEAR STORM
C:
0.60
Tc:
15.0' I:
5.5
inthr
Cr--
38.2
cfs
PRINCIPAL SPILLWAY DESIGN
iS. REQUIRED SPILLWAY CAPACITY:
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY? Y/N
REQUIRED SPILLWAY CAPACITY:
14.6
1 CFS
16. ASSUMED AVAILABLE HEAD:
ELEV. OF CREST OF E.S. IF USED:
538.00
ASSUMED AVAILABLE HEAD-!
1.00
ft
17. RISER DIMENSIONS: I
I
_w
RISER DAMETER:
48.00
1n
(From Plate 3.14-8 or Calm)
ACTUAL MAX. ELEV.:
i 538.84
ft
From Calm if appropriate)
ACTUAL HEAD:
1 1.84
ft
From Plate 3.148 or Calm
18. BARREL LENGTH:
BARREL LENGTH:
49.00
ft
BARREL INVERT OUT:
530.00
ft
HEAD H ON BARREL:
8.84
It
From Plate 3.14-7)
19. BARREL DIAMETER:
BARREL DIAMETER:
24
in
(From Plate 3.14A or
3.14B
20. TRASH RACK AND ANTI -VORTEX DEVICE:
DUMETER:
72
in
(From Plate 3.14D
HEIGHT:
21
in
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY DESIGN
21. REQUIRED SPILLWAY CAPACITY:
Qe = Q(25)-Qp =,
14.6
CFS
22. DIMENSIONS:
BOTTOM WIDTH (b):
10.00
ft
From Table 3.14-C)
SLOPE OF EXIT CHANNEL s :
3.801RRt
(From Table 3.14-C)
MIN. LENGTH EXIT CHANNEL Is):
47.00,R
(From Table 3.14C
ANTI -SEEP COLLAR DESIGN
23. DIMENSIONS:
DEPTH WATER CREST OF P.S. Y :
4.00A
SLOPE UPSTREAM FACE DAM (Z):,
2.00!:1
SLOPE P.S. BARREL (Sb):1
4.00
%
LENGTH BARREL IN SAT. ZONE Ls):
36.00111
From Plate 3.14-11)
FINAL DESIGN ELEVATIONS
25. ELEVATIONS:
TOP OF DAM:
540.00 1
ft
DESIGN HIGH WATER:
-SPILLWAY
538.84ft
Mai
EMERGENCY CREST:
638.00R
PRINCIPAL SPILLWAY CREST:
S37.00 ft
DEWATERING ORIFICE INVERT:
535.00 ft
CLEANOUT ELEVATION: 1
532.50ft
Page 2 WHITTINGTON-SB1.xls
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN
PROJECT
I
WHITTINGTON
PROJ NO.
13.0039
BASIN #
ISEDIMENT
BASIN SB4
DATEfiII1212
LOCATION
BY
INPUT
DRAINAGE AREA
5.19
BASIN VOLUME DESIGN
WETSTORAGE
1. MINIMUM REQUIRED VOLUME
347.73
CY
2. AVAILABLE BASIN VOLUME
AVERAGE
END AREA - BASIN VOLUME
ESTIMATES
I
ELEVATION
AREA
VOLUME
VOLUME
TOTAL
ft
sf
I cf
cy
cy
459.99
1 1.00
29.02
1.07
460
5,803.00
1.07
12,973.00
480.48
462
1 7,170.00
1
481.68
3,675.00
136.11
462.5
7,630.00
617.67
12,140.25
449.64
464
8,657.00
_
1,067.31
18,920.00
700.74
466
10,263.00
1,768.05
_
22,253.00
824.19
468
11,990.00
1
2,592.23
25,888.00
958.81
470
13,898.00
1
3,651.06
REQUIRED WET
STORAGE
VOLUME
j
347.73
APPROX. ELEVATION
461.50
3. EXCAVATE CUBIC YARDS
4. AVAILABLE VOLUME BEFORE CLEANOUT
REQUIRED
171.27
S. ELEVATION
CORRESPONDING TO CLEANOUT LEVEL
460.80
6. DISTANCE
FROM DEWATERING ORIFICE TO C/O LEVEL
1.75
INVERT DEWATERING ORIFICE R'QD I461.50
INVERT DEWATERING ORIFICE USED
463.50
APPROX. VOLUME AT INVERT USED
9462.00
cy
DISTANCE FROM INVERT TO C/O LEVEL
1.75
ft
DISTANCE ACCEPTABLE
WET STORAGE VOLUME ACCEPTABLE
DRYSTORAGE
7. MINIMUM REQUIRED
VOLUME
347.73
S. TOTAL AVAILABLE
VOLUME AT CREST OF RISER
CREST OF RISER I 1
1
466.70
APPROX. AVAILABLE
TOTAL VOLUME
1966.00
cy
INADEQUATE
DRY STORAGE
VOLUME
9. DIAMETER OF DEWATERING
ORIFICE
Q
4.09
cis
d
3.00 1
in
USE d
10. DIAMETER OF FLEXIBLE
TUBING
061n
STANDARD SIZE
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
11. PRELIMINARY DESIGN ELEVATIONS:
CREST
OF RISER
466.70
ft
TOP
OF DAM
470.00
ft
DESIGN HIGH
WATER'
466.90 ft
'desi
n of high water assumes a peek flowrats
UPSTREAM TOE
OF DAM,
460.00111
o17.8 cfs storage volume is not considered.
Page i WHITTINGTON-SB1.XI8
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN
PROJECT
WHITTINGTON
PROJ NO.
13.0039
BASIN #
SEDIMENT BASIN SB41
DATE
6/2/2015
LOCATION
IBY
DEG
BASIN SHAPE
12. LENGTH OF FLOW / EFFECTIVE
WIDTH:
SURFACE AREA OF NORMAL
POOLI
9907
sf
LENGTH OF
FLOW PATH
154
It
EFFECTIVE WIDTH
100
It
LIWe
1.54
BAFFLES REQUIRED
RUNOFF
(RATIONAL METHOD CALCULATION
USE MAXIMUM C VALUE DURING CONSTRUCTION
AND
MINIMUM To VALUE
13. FLOW FROM 2-YEAR STORM
C:1
0.45
Tc:
15.7
I:
3.4
INhr
ozi
7.91
cfs
14. FLOW FROM 25-YEAR STORM
C:
0.45
To: 15.7 L•
5.5
in/hr
Q=1
112.8
cfs
T-
PRINCIPAL PILLWAY DESIGN
�-
15. REQUIRED SPILLWAY CAPACITY:
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY? (YIN)
REQUIRED SPILLWAY CAPACITY:
4.9
CPS
M. ASSUMED AVAILABLE HEAD:
ELEV. OF CREST OF E.S. IF USED:
467.70
ASSUMED
AVAILABLE HEAD=
0.60ft
17. RISER DIMENSIONS:
I
RISER DIAMETER:;
_
48.00
in
From Plate 3.14-8 or Calms)
ACTUAL MAX. ELEV.:
1 468.30
ft
(From Calms if appropriate)
_
ACTUAL HEAD:
j 0.60
ft
(From Plate 3.14-8 or Calms
18. BARREL LENGTH:
BARREL LENGTH:
68.00
ft
BARREL INVERT OUT:
454.00
ft
HEAD H ON BARREL:
14.30
ft
(From Plate 3.14-7)
19. BARREL DIAMETER:
BARREL DIAMETER:
24in
From Plate 3.14A or
3.14B
20. TRASH RACK AND ANTI -VORTEX DEVICE:
DIAMETER:
I 72
In
From Plate 3.14D)
HEIGHT:
21
In
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY DESIGN
21. REQUIRED SPILLWAY CAPACITY:
Qe=Q(25)-Qp=l
4.8
CFS
22. DIMENSIONS:
BOTTOM WIDTH b : I
12.00
ft
(From Table 3.14-C)
SLOPE OF EXIT CHANNEL (a):
3.00
ft/ft
From Table 3.14-C)
MIN. LENGTH EXIT CHANNEL (x):
36.00
ft
From Table 3.14-C
ANTI -SEEP COLLAR DESIGN
_
23. DIMENSIONS:
DEPTH WATER @ CREST OF P.S. Y):
6.70 It
SLOPE UPSTREAM FACE DAM (Z):
2.00 :1
SLOPE P.S. BARREL (Sb):
7.36
%
LENGTH BARREL IN SAT. ZONE Ls :
42.00 It
j (From
Plate 3.14-11)
FINAL DESIGN ELEVATIONS
26. ELEVATIONS:
TOP OF DAM:
470.00 ft
DESIGN HIGH WATER:
466.90 It
_
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY CREST:
467.70 ft
PRINCIPAL SPILLWAY CREST:
466.70 It
DEWATERING ORIFICE INVERT:
463.50 It
_
CLEANOUT ELEVATION:
461.75111
L.
I Page 2 WHITTINGTONSB1.xls
L,
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN
PROJECT li
WHITTINGTON
PROJ NO.
13.0039
BASIN #
SEDIMENT BASIN SB-5
DATE
6/16/2015
LOCATION
BY
DEG
INPUTll
DRAINAGE AREA
6.04
ac
BASIN VOLUME
DESIGN
_
WETSTORAGE
1. MINIMUM
REQUIRED VOLUME
404.68
cy
2. AVAILABLE
BASIN VOLUME
AVERAGE END
AREA - BASIN VOLUME
ESTIMATES
ELEVATION
AREA
VOLUME
I VOLUME
TOTAL
ft
sf
I cy
cy
457.49
1 0.00
13.89
0.61
457.5
2,778.00
0.51
1,444.75
6351
458
3,001.00
S"2
3,236.50
119.97
459
3,472.00
173.89
3.723.00
137.89
460
3,974.00
311.78
2,911.65
107.84
460.7
4,345.00
419.62
6,123.00
226.78
_
482
5,075.00
646.40
5,374.00
199.04
463
5,673.00
845.44
56988.50
221.80
464
6,304.00
1,067.23
13,964,00
517.19
_
466
7,660.00
1
1,684.42
REQUIRED WET STORAGE
VOLUME
404.68
ley
APPROX. ELEVATION
1
460.70
3. EXCAVATE CUBIC YARDS
4. AVAILABLE VOLUME BEFORE CLEANOUT
REQUIRED
199.32
c
S. ELEVATION CORRESPONDING TO CLEANOUT
LEVEL
459.50
6. DISTANCE FROM DEWATERING ORIFICE
TO C/O LEVEL
1.2
INVERT DEWATERING ORIFICE
R'QD
460.70
INVERT DEWATERING ORIFICE USED
460.70
APPROX. VOLUME AT INVERT USED
419.62 1
c
DISTANCE FROM INVERT TO C/O LEVEL 1
1
1.20
ft
DISTANCE ACCEPTABLE
WET STORAGE VOLUME ACCEPTABLE
DRYSTORAGE
7. MINIMUM REQUIRED VOLUME
404.68
8. TOTAL AVAILABLE VOLUME AT CREST OF RISER
CREST OF RISER 1
463.00
APPROX. AVAILABLE TOTAL VOLUME
846.84
cy
ADEQUATE DRY STORAGE VOLUME
9. DIAMETER OF DEWATERING ORIFICE
Q
0.53
cfS
tl
4.35
in
USE tl 1
4
in
10. DIAMETER OF FLEXIBLE TUBING
6 in
STANDARD SIZE
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
11. PRELIMINARY DESIGN ELEVATIONS:
CREST OF RISER
463.00ift
TOP OF DAM I
466.00
ft
DESIGN HIGH WATER',
464.00ift •tlesi
n of high water assumes a peak fi w to
Page 1 WHITTINGTON-SB1.xis
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN
PROJECT
WHITTINGTON
PROJ NO.
1 13.0039
BASIN #
'SEDIMENT BASIN SBS
IDATE
6/16/2016
LOCATION
BY
DEG
BASIN SHAPE
12. LENGTH OF FLOW / EFFECTIVE
WIDTH:
SURFACE AREA OF NORMAL POOL'
4345
sf
LENGTH OF FLOW PATH
La
It
EFFECTIVE MOTH
i 80ft
LNVe,
0.63
BAFFLES REQUIRED
RUNOFF
RATIONAL METHOD
CALCULATION
USE MAXIMUM
C VALUE DURING CONSTRUCTION
AND
MINIMUM Te VALUE
13. FLOW FROM
2-YEAR STORM
C:
0.60
To:
16.0 l:
3.4
in/hr
Q=
12.3
cfa
14. FLOW FROM
26-YEAR STORM
C:
0.60
To:
16.0 1:
5.4
In1hr
Q=
19.6
CIS
PRINCIPAL SPILLWAY
DESIGN
15. REQUIRED SPILLWAY CAPACITY:
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY? (YIN),
Ni
REQUIRED SPILLWAY CAPACITY:
19.6
CFS
16. ASSUMED AVAILABLE HEAD:
ELEV. OF CREST OF E.S. IF USED:
N/A
ASSUMED AVAILABLE HEAD=j
0.70
ft
17. RISER DIMENSIONS:
RISER DIAMETER:
48.00
in
rom Phd. 3.14-8 01CalOs
ACTUAL MAX. ELEV.:
464.00
ft rom Cake if ro riate
ACTUAL HEAD:
1.00
ft (From Plate 3.14-8 or Calm)
_
18. BARREL LENGTH;
BARREL LENGTH:
37.00
ft
BARREL INVERT OUT:
457.00
ft
HEAD H ON BARREL:
7.00
M fflam Plate 3.14
19. BARREL DIAMETER:
BARREL DIAMETER: 1
24in
ran Plate 3.14A 0r
3.148)
20. TRASH RACK AND ANTI -VORTEX DEVICE:
DIAMETER: I
361n
I(From Plefe 3.140
HEIGHT:
13
in
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY DESIGN
21. REQUIRED SPILLWAY CAPACITY:
Qe = Q(25)-Op =
WA
CFS
22. DIMENSIONS:
BOTTOM WIDTH b:"NIAft
(Fran Table 3.14C)
SLOPE OF EXIT CHANNEL s :Wit
From Table 3.14-C)
MIN. LENGTH EXIT CHANNEL (x):R
rom Table 3.144;)
ANTISEEP COLLAR DESIGN
23. DIMENSIONS:
DEPTH WATER CREST OF P.3. (Y):.ft
SLOPE UPSTREAM FACE DAM (Z):
2.00
:1
SLOPE P.S. BARREL (Sb):p
1.35
%
LENGTH BARREL IN SAT. ZONE (La):
30.001ft
(From Plate 3.1411)
FINAL DESIGN ELEVATIONS
43
25. ELEVATIONS:
MWATER:
466.00' ft
DESIGN
464.00ft
EMERGENCY SPILL
N/Aft
PRINCIPAL SPILL463.00
1 It
DEWATERING ORIFICE INVERT:
460.70 ft
CLEANOUT ELEVATION: i
459.50,ft
Pages WHITTINGTONSB1.xl9