HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP202100009 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2021-03-23or ALg Christopher Perez
County of Albemarle Senior Planner
cperez@albemarle.org
Community Development Department 434-296-5832 ext. 3443
�tac�P
Memorandum
To: Justin Shimp
Date: March 23, 2021
Subject: SDP20210009 999 Rio Road — Final Site Plan
The Planner for the Planning Services Division of the Albemarle County Department Community
Development will recommend approval of the plan referred to above when the following items have been
satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time.
Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment
is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.]
Required Prior to Final Site Plan Approval:
1. 18-32.5.2 Requirements of an initial site plan.
a. Ensure the final site plan submittal also meets all requirements for final site plans (18-
32.6). Rev 1. Comment still relevant, see this review letter.
b. Clearly show all lot lines. Some appear to be disconnected/incomplete. Rev 1. Comment
addressed.
c. Include that the property is also within the Airport Impact Area AIA zoning district
overlay. Rev 1. Comment addressed.
d. Include on sheet 1 that there is a Code of Development per ZMA201900001, latest
revision date 01-29-20. Rev 1. Comment addressed.
e. Revise watershed note on sheet 1 — this property is not within a water supply watershed.
Rev 1. Comment addressed.
f. Show the edge of the existing MUP along Belvedere Boulevard. Rev 1. Comment
addressed.
g. Show any proposed ROW dedication. This will need to be completed with a plat. Rev 1.
Comment not addressed. The right of way dedications are depicted. Prior to final
site plan approval the right of way dedication plat shall be submitted to the County,
approved, and then recorded in the Clerk's Office. Provide the recordation
information for this action on the final site plan.
h. Label the distance of each ingress/egress to the centerline of the Rio/Belvedere
intersection. Rev 1. Comment addressed.
2. 18-4.6.1 Frontage. Note that all units in Block 1 must front on a public or private street (lots in
Block 2 front on an amenity). If the multiuse path (MUP) becomes part of the ROW, the lots
should front on the edge of the ROW/MUP. If the MUP does not become part of the ROW, the
lot lines will need to extend to the ROW, and a public access easement will be needed over the
MUP. Rev 1. Comment not addressed. The right of way dedication is depicted. Prior to final
site plan approval the right of way dedication plat shall be submitted to the County,
approved, and then recorded in the Clerk's Office. Provide the recordation information for
this action on the final site plan.
3. 18-4.6.1 Frontage. The amenity area for Block 2 must include a private street for frontage for
Lots 11-21. The application plan for the ZMA also shows a private street. The private street
easement must extend to the front of each lot for frontage purposes. This was done with Riverside
Village as well. Rev 1. Comment not addressed. Only 1 lot in Block 2 fronts on the private
street. Revise, so they all do.
4. 18-4.11.4 Easements and structures.
a. Coordinate with the easement holder (appears to be VDOT) of the temporary slope
easement to see if this easement is no longer required and can be removed. Otherwise, a
letter from the easement holder is needed, granting permission to have structures in the
easement. Rev 1. This easement is no longer proposed on the plan.
b. There may be additionally comments on easements and structures once all easements are
shown on the final site plan. Rev 1. Additional comments on easements are provided
below.
5. 18-4.12.6 Number of parking spaces.
a. Revise parking notes to clarify which multifamily units are "single-family attached"
versus "apartments". Rev 1. Comment addressed.
b. Label the garages on the site plan. Rev 1. Garages are not provided. Comment no
longer relevant.
c. Include a total number of parking spaces required and provided. Rev 1. Comment
addressed.
6. 18-4.12.10 Shared parking. A shared parking agreement will be required for the shared parking
between uses and Blocks. This agreement must meet the requirements of 18-4.12.8(e). Rev 1.
Comment not addressed. The shared parking agreement has not been submitted. Prior to
final site plan approval this agreement shall be approved by the County and recorded in the
Clerk's Office. Additionally, on each sheet of the site plan label the parking spaces which
are being shared between uses and blocks.
7. 18-4.12.16 ADA spaces. Provide one (1) ADA parking space. This must also be van -accessible.
Rev 1. Comment addressed.
8. 18-4.12.16(e) Provide bumper blocks for parking spaces adjacent to sidewalks less than 6' per
the following requirement: the parking has curb or curb and gutter and there is a sidewalk
located closer than two feet from the edge of the parking area, except that bumper blocks shall
not be required where a sidewalk has a minimum width of six feet. Rev 1. Comment
addressed.
9. 18-4.12.13 and 4.12.18 Loading spaces. Provide one (1) loading space for the office per 18-
4.12.13 meeting the design standards of 18-4.12.18. Rev 1. The office space is not proposed at
this time. Comment no longer applicable.
10. 18-4.12.13(e) and 18-4.12.19 Dumpster. Provide a dumpster/dumpster pad for the office. Ensure
the 18-32.7.9 screening requirements are met. Rev 1. ZMA2019-1, 4.12.19, 32.7.9, 30.61 COD
Section V,, Notes to Table D #8. Comment not fully addressed. Provide screening for the
dumpster.
11. 18-4.17 Lighting plan. Provide a lighting plan meeting the requirements of 18-4.17 with the final
site plan submittal. Rev 1. The office space is not proposed at this time, that is the only
portion of the site with possible lighting. Comment no longer applicable at this time.
12. 18-32.7.9 Landscaping plan. A landscaping plan is required with the final site plan. The
following are preliminary comments:
a. 18-32.7.9.4: Show the requirements of the contents of a landscape plan, including
existing landscaping/natural features and proposed landscaping. Provide a conservation
checklist if trees are being retained. Show removal of existing landscaping on the
demolition plan. Rev 1. Comment not addressed.
b. 18-32.7.9.5: Ensure street trees meet all of the relevant requirements, including minimum
caliper and spacing. Rev 1. Comment not addressed. Street trees along Rio Road East
and Belvedere will be reviewed by the ARB. Comments will be provided on April 5,
2021 after the meeting.
c. 18-32.7.9.6: 5 percent of the parking area will need to be landscaped. One large shade
tree per 10 parking spaces is required. Rev 1. Comment addressed.
d. 18-32.7.9.7 Ensure all required screening meets the requirements of this section and of
the ZMA application plan. Parking areas must also be screened according to note D-7 in
the Code of Development. Rev 1. Comment not addressed. ZMA2019-1 COD Section
V, Notes to Table D #7: The final site plan shall depict and label all landscaping
required for the site. Currently the landscape sheet states: "Screening to be provided
in accordance with the code of development". This will not suffice. Revise the
landscape plan to depict and label the required plantings for staffs review.
e. 18-32.7.9.8 Ensure that there is at least 15 percent tree canopy for the site and that trees
are 5+ feet after 10 years. Rev 1. Comment addressed.
f 18-32.7.9 Ensure all plantings are on the County's approved list. Provide planting species
with the final site plan. Rev 1. Comment addressed.
13. ZMA201900001 Code of Development: The following are comments regarding the Code of
Development:
a. Front setback Block 1: Note that boundaries will likely change with ROW dedication for
the MUP. This will affect where setbacks are measured from. The MUP should be
dedicated to public use and should become part of the ROW. Rev 1. Comment not
addressed. Label and dimension the setbacks throughout the plan.
b. Rear setback Block 2: Note that boundaries will likely change with ROW dedication for
MUP; ensure setbacks are still met. Rev 1. Comment not addressed. Label and
dimension the setbacks throughout the plan.
c. Include a table for the amenity and greenspaces detailing how the requirement is being
met. Adding up the totals in Block 1, it appears 8,538 SF is provided. For Block 2, it
appears 10,439 SF is provided (more than listed on sheet 1). Rev 1. Comment not
addressed.
IZMA2019-1, 32.5.2(b), 32.5.2(n)l Application Plan. Some of the required amenities
depicted on the initial site plan have been substantially modified or omitted on the final
site plan. The final site plan shall meet the requirements of the rezoning,as s required by
the application plan and the Code of Development. Revise the final site plan to provide
the minimum required amenities (A-H from the ZMA): the Courtyard, multiuse path,
central greenspace/playspace area, wspace area, dog park, multiuse path, and
courtyard. The locations and SF of these amenities are depicted on Sheet 6 of the
application plan. Please review and revise the final site plan to depict and label these
amenities and label their square footage.
[ZMA2019-1, 32.5.2(bb)] COD Section IIL For the amenities revise the chart on the final
site plan to reflect the changes required to address the above mentioned comment.
IZMA2019-1, 32.5.2(b), 32.5.2(n)l COD Section IIL The parameters of the amenities
need to be clearly hatched on the final site plan, as it is hard to tell where they begin and
where they end. Revise.
d. Provide signage and/or bollards at the entrance to the amenity area that ensures vehicular
access is prohibited except for emergency vehicles. Rev 1. Comment addressed. Sign
provided. Fire Access Only.
e. Include a note on sheet 1 that all primary residential structures in Block 1 must face
Belvedere Boulevard. Rev 1. Comment addressed.
f Parking areas must be screened according to 18-32.7.9 and Note D-7 in the Code of
Development. This requirement must be met prior to final site plan approval. Rev 1.
Comment not addressed.
g. Label the affordable housing units on the final site plan. Rev 1. Comment addressed.
h. Include a note on sheet 1 that a minimum of 15% of the dwelling units must be
affordable. Rev 1. Comment addressed.
14. ZMA201900001 Application Plan: The following are comments regarding the application plan:
a. For the amenity and greenspaces, show additional detail on the final site plan. For
example, seating is required for the courtyard and plaza areas. Rev 1. Comment
addressed.
b. Include a label for the central greenspace area on the plan. Label the material. This must
provide emergency access. Rev 1. Comment addressed.
c. The application plan shows a pedestrian connection between the office and the amenity
area in Block 2. Provide this connection. Rev 1. Comment not addressed.
d. A landscape area is required along the eastern and northern sides of the development, per
the application plan. This would include the area behind Lots 16-21. If the required
landscape area will be provided on the lots, a landscaping easement will be required.
Rev 1. Comment not addressed.
15. Additional applications: The following applications and approvals are required prior to final site
plan approval:
a. 18-32.7.4.2 and 18-32.7.5.3: Easement Plats: All new and adjusted easements must be
shown on an easement plat, which must be approved prior to final site plan approval, and
must match the final site plan. The DB/PG of new easements must be shown on the final
site plan.
i. Offsite ACSA easements will be needed. Offsite easements must be approved
prior to final site plan approval. Rev 1. Comment not addressed. [32.7.5.1,
32.5.2(a), 32.5.2(k), 4.1, VA State Code 15.2-18001 Each development and
each lot shall be served by the public water supply and the public sewer
system. This development is relying on infrastructure provided through a
County owned property (TMP 062FO-00-00-OOOE20) for public sewer
service. Please submit an easement plat for County review, here is a LINK to
the application. Prior to County approval of the easement plat the Board of
Supervisors shall hold a public hearing and act on the easement. Prior to
final site plan approval, the sewer easement shall be recorded in the Clerk's
Office. Also, prior to final site plan approval the sewer connection shall
either be built or bonded.
b. 18-32.7.4.1: Approval of a VSMP Plan is required prior to final site plan approval. See
Engineering comments. Rev 1. Comment not addressed.
c. Chapter 14: A final subdivision plat will be required for subdividing the lots. This can be
approved before or after final site plan approval. Rev 1. Comment still relevant.
d. 18-30.6: A certificate of appropriateness (COA) from the ARB is required prior to final
site plan approval. Rev 1. Comment not addressed. [ZMA2019-11 COD Section IV.
The Entrance Corridor Design guidelines of Section 30. 6 shall apply, which may
require features and/ or treatments over and above those listed in this Code of
Development. ARB will review this plan on April 5, 2021, comments will be
provided after that meeting. Prior to final site plan approval ARB must have
approved the plans.
Additional review comments
16. [32.7.5.1, 32.5.2(a), 32.5.2(d), VA State Code 15.2-18001 Grading is taking place on TMP
062170-00-00-OOOE2, which is property owned by Albemarle County. Prior to final site plan
approval an easement shall be reviewed, approved, and then recorded in the Clerk's Office which
allows grading on this parcel. Please submit an easement plat for County review, here is a LINK
to the application. Prior to County approval of the easement plat the Board of Supervisors shall
hold a public hearing and act on the easement.
17. [32.5.2(a)] The adjacent property to the south is incorrectly labeled, it is truly TMP 062170-00-00-
000E2. Revise.
18. [32.5.2(a)] Based on the County's GIS the abutting property to the north adjacent to Belvedere
Blvd is TMP 062GO-01-00-00OA0, owned by Belvedere Neighborhood Association Inc. In
speaking with Ms. Scrow this property was added to the Belvedere Blvd right of way and is no
longer an individual TMP. If this is the case, for this area provide the recordation information for
this action. If it turns out the parcel still exists, depict and label the TMP and owner. If it does
exist prior to final site plan approval an easement shall be reviewed, approved, and then
recorded in the clerk's office which allows these improvements to be located on this parcel.
19. [32.7.9.7, 32.5.2(b), ZMA2019-11 COD Section V, Notes to Table D #7. Provide documentation
to prove the following requirement has been addressed. Provide minutes and an action letter from
a duly authorize meeting of the HOA, and signed letters from the individuals/entities listed in (2)
and (3) below, agreeing to one of three screening options provided for each of the three locations
listed below.
7. Pursuant to Section 32.7.9.7, the parking areas along the northern and southeastern
boundaries of the subject property are required to be screened. In addition to Section
32.7.9.7(b), the Applicant shall provide three different reasonable types of screening
options to each of the following groups, for each of the following locations, as
follows:
a. For the screening in Block I at the southeastern boundary of the Property, to
(1) the Shephard's Ridge Homeowners' Association which consists of
residents immediately adjacent to the Property,
b. For the screening in Block 2 at the southeastern boundary of the Property, to
(2) Warren M. and Virginia M. Stallings, the owners of Tax Map Parcel
062FO-00-00-31300 (2033 Shephard's Ridge), and/or their successors or
assigns, and
c. For the screening along the northern boundary of the Property, to (3) the
owners of the three parcels across Shephard's Ridge Road from the Property:
(A) Kent J. Rychcik Living Trust and Susan W. Rychcik Living Trust, the
owners of Tax Map Parcel 062FO-00-00-28100 (2050 Shepherd's Ridge),
and/or their successors or assigns, James G. and Betty D. Cannon, the owners
of Tax Map Parcel 062FO-00-00-28000 (2044 Shepherd's Ridge), and/or their
successors or assigns and (C) Alexis Ann Halley Revocable Trust, the owner
of Tax Map Parcel 062FO-00-00-27900 (2038 Shephard's Ridge Road), and/or
its successors or assigns.
By a majority vote at a duly authorized meeting of the members of the
homeowners' association, and the individuals/entities listed in (2) and (3) above,
the applicable parties shall choose one of the three screening options provided for
each of the three locations listed above.
At minimum, at least one of the options provided shall include a fence up to seven
feet in height (or taller, if the parties agree). Such meetings shall be called within
thirty (30) days of receipt of written notice from the Applicant and/or its assigns.
In addition, such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or
conditioned. If the Applicant does not receive a response within thirty (30) days
of receipt of the Applicant's written notice, such lack of response shall be
considered an approval of any or all of the options provided.
20. [ZMA2019-1, 32.5.2(b), 32.5.2(n)] Application Plan. Along Rio Road East the asphalt multiuse
path shall be a minimum of 11.5' wide for the entire duration of Rio Road East fronting the
property. Also, depict, label, and dimension the edge of the existing path along Rio Road East.
The proposed path shall connect to the existing path. Revise.
21. [ZMA2019-1, 4.12.19, 32.7.9, 30.6] COD Section V, Notes to Table D #9. On the plan provide a
note that certifies onsite treatment of 25% of the required stormwater treatment.
22. [ZMA2019-1, 32.5.2(b), 32.5.2(n)] COD Section H. The site shall have a minimum of 500 square
feet of nonresidential SF. Currently the office building is not proposed. On the final site plan
provide a phase line and state that this area is designated for the required nonresidential use.
23. [ZMA2019-1, 32.5.2(b), 32.5.2(c), 32.5.2(n)] Application Plan. Provide a sidewalk internal to
the site which connects to Rio Road East. If the applicant seeks to install this sidewalk during the
construction of the office building, please label this required improvement in phase 2. Depict
phase lines for phase 2.
24. [ZMA2019-1] COD Section V. On the cover sheet list the number of units proposed, to also
include the accessory 1-bedroom apartments. Throughout the plans label which units contain 1-
bedroom accessory apartments. These units are only permitted in Block 1 per the COD.
25. [32.5.2(a), ZMA2019-1] Provide a note on the cover sheet that Special Exceptions were
approved on 1-14-2020. List the items subject of the variation.
26. [32.5.2(a), ZMA2019-1] Application Plan. Dimension and label the landscape strip along Rio
Road East (five feet and five inches minimum) and Belvedere Boulevard (3 feet minimum).
Engineering (David James) — Review comments attached.
VDOT (Adam Moore) — Review comments attached.
Fire/Rescue (Howard Lagomarsino) — Review comments attached.
ACSA (Richard Nelson) — Review comments attached.
RWSA (Dyon Vega) — Review comments attached.
Building Inspections (Betty Slough) - Review comments attached.
E911 (Elise Kiewra) - Review comments attached.
Architectural Review Board (Margaret Maliszewski) — Comments pending, to be forwarded once
received. This plan will be reviewed by the ARB on April 5, 2021. Comments will be provided after that
meeting.
Review Comments for SDP2O21OOOO9 Final Site Development Plan
Project Name 1 999 RIO RD - FINAL - DIGITAL
Date Completed: Tuesday. March 09, 2021 Department/Division/Agency: Review Status:
Reviewer: David James
1. The VSMP plan will need to be approved prior to FSP approval.
2. Cover —
CDD Engineering Requested Changes
a. Add SDP# under title.
b. Provide date and source: All topography should be at least visually field verified by the designer within the last year.
3. Sheet 3 — Provide emergency access signage before access, or install bollards.
4. Sheet 3/7 —
a. Add note that sidewalk shall be T thick at emergency access entrance.
b. Add note to curb details that a 6' 21-A or better stone base is required.
5. Sheet 6 —
a. Correct labeling for pipe -run for 5/C6.
b. 6/C6 — Provide min. separation for water main crossing.
C. 6/C6 — Correct the slope or invert elev.
6. Provide gutter pan at the entrances and direct water away from entrances.
a. Show that conc. runoff (lcfs or greater) does not run across entrance.
7. Provide type of VDOT std. guardrail.
8. Provide height, max of retaining wall.
9. Eng. design required for walls over 4' high.
Pape: 0 County of Albemarle Printed On: 03131021
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Stephen C. Brich, P.E. 1401 East Broad Street (804) 7862701
Commissioner Richmond, Virginia 23219 Fax: (804) 7862940
February 11, 2021
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Attn: Chris Perez
Re: 999 Rio Road — Final Site Plan
SDP-2021-00009
Review # 1
Dear Mr. Perez:
The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Shimp Engineering, dated 26
May 2020, revised 21 January 2021. Please note; previous comment from the initial site plan
submission still remains applicable.
Land Use
1. Please include turn lane warrant as appropriate.
If further information is desired, please contact Willis C. Bedsaul at 434-422-9866.
A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right of way. The
owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency land Use Section at (434) 422-9399
for information pertaining to this process.
Sincerely,
Adam J. Moore, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
Date Completed:I Wednesday, March 03, 2021
Reviewer: Richard Nelson
DepadmeM/Division/Agency:
ACSA
Review Status:
Requested Changes
From: Richard Nelson <melson@seMceauthodty.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 4:35 PM
To: Christopher Perez <cperez@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: Transmittal of SDP202100009 — 999 Rio Road — Final Site Plan
Chris,
Below are comments for SDP202100009 — 999 Rio Road — Final Site Plan:
The applicant will need to submit 3 hard copies toACSAfor review.
RWSA will need to review and approve the water main connection.
Thanks,
Richard Nelson
Civil Engineer
Albemarle County Service Authority
168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22911
(434) 977-4511
Page: 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: 03/23/2 221
Review Comments for SDP202100009 Final Site Development Plan
Project Name: 999 RIO RD -FINAL -DIGITAL
Date Completed: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 DepartmenUDivisionlAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer �tty Slough J CDD Inspections See Recommendations
Pape: 10 County of Albemarle Printed Cn: o3f23f2021
APPLICATION#
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
�r
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS - E911
SDP202100009
TMP: 061000000154BO
DATE: 2/11/2021
FROM: Elise Kiewra
ekiewra()albemarle.org
Geographic Data Services (GDS)
https://www.albemarle.org/
(434) 296-5832 ext. 3030
Three (2) road names total will be required, see map below. Road "A" and Road "B" will
require a name.
This site will require a two (2) new private road names. Per Sec. 7-200-B of the County's Road
Naming and Property Numbering Ordinance (Page 2 of PDF).
"It is intended by this article that all roads within the county which serve or are designed
to serve three (3) or more dwelling units or business structures shall be named."
We recommend providing three (3) candidate names for each road to our office for
review, in case your first choices are not acceptable.
A PDF version of the Ordinance and Manual can be found here:
https://(iisweb-albemarle.org/gisdata/Road Naming and Property Numbering Ordinanc
e and Manual.pdf
Please consult the County's Road Name Index to check your road names prior to
submittal. The Index can be found here:
https://Ifweb.albemarle.or(i/Forms/RoadNameIndex
Parcel and mapping information can be found here:
https://(iisweb.albemarle.org/gpv 51/Viewer.aspxx
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
.. $ ® mewpiamcex�
I
I
I
I
I
rt
I
i
ti
•—
of
:°
F1
Ll
E
—
Review Comments for SDP202100009 Final Site Development Plan
Project Name 999 RIO RD - FINAL - DIGITAL
Date Completed: Monday, March 01, 2021 DepartmenVDivisionlAgency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Howard Lagomarsino � Fire Rescue Requested Changes
Pape: 10 County of Albemarle Printed On: rOV2310211
Christopher Perez
From: Tori Kanellopoulos
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2021 3:06 PM
To: Christopher Perez
Subject: Fw: 999 Rio Rd site plan comments
From: Dyon Vega <dvega@rivanna.org>
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2021 11:06 AM
To: Tori Kanellopoulos <vkanellopoulos@albemarle.org>
Cc: vfort@rivanna.org <vfort@rivanna.org>; Richard Nelson <rnelson@serviceauthority.org>
Subject: 999 Rio Rd site plan comments
CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open
attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.
Tori,
RWSA has reviewed the 999 Rio Road Final Site plan with the most recent revision dated 1/21/21 and have the following
comments.
Sheet C4:
1. Please seek the ACSA water line in Belvedere Blvd? for a tap before proposing a tap to the 18" RWSA water
line.
2. Please show easement for 18" RWSA WL.
3. the proposed 18" HDPE storm sewer needs at least 18" of vertical separation from RWSA 18" WL.
4. Storm Structure Al should be a minimum of 5' from the RWSA 18" WL
Sheet C7:
1. There is significant grading proposed around 18" RWSA WL, which will limit future access to the water line.
Please consider a retaining wall with deep enough footers to allow for excavation around the water line or
reduce grading in this area.
2. RWSA would like to request additional easement, a 30' easement. for access and maintenance based on the
proposed site improvements and grading.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Dyon Vega
Civil Engineer
RIVANNA
WAHR& WMRAU��
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority
(434) 977-2970, Ext. 170
695 Moores Creek Lane
Charlottesville, VA 22902
www.rivanna.ore
7
Review Comments for SDP202100009 Final Site Development Plan
Project Name: 999 RIO RD - FINAL - DIGITAL
Date Completed: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 Department/Division/Agency: Review Status:
Reviewer: Margaret Maliszewski CDDARB See Recommendations
Pape: 10 County of Albemarle Printed On: 0312312021