Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB202100027 Staff Report 2021-04-02ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Project #/Name ARB-2021-27: 999 Rio Road Final Site Plan Review Type Final Site Development Plan Parcel Identification 06100-00-00-154B0 Location At the east corner of the intersection of Rio Road and Belvedere Boulevard. (See Figure 1.) Zoned Neighborhood Model District (NMD)/Entrance Corridor (EC) Owner/Applicant Windmill Ventures LLC/Shimp Engineering (Justin Shimp) Magisterial District Rio Proposal To construct the first phase of a mixed -use development including multi -family attached and single-family attached and detached residential units, with associated site improvements. A 5,000-sf office building is planned for Phase 2. Context The subject parcel is comprised of a ca. 1960 residence and associated outbuildings and wooded area. In the immediate vicinity on the Entrance Corridor is a mix of large-scale institutional development (Covenant Church to the northwest and CATEC to the southwest) and single-family detached residential development (Dunlora, two- to three -stories) to the south and east. Single -story commercial development is found on the north side of the corridor just west of the railroad tracks, with residential on the south side, and a mix of residential, institutional and office beyond. (See Figure 2.) Visibility The proposed development will be readily visible from the Rio Road Entrance Corridor. Once constructed, the office building will limit some views of the various residential units. ARB Meeting Date April 5, 2021 Staff Contact Margaret Maliszewski PROJECT HISTORY/CHANGES The ARB reviewed the initial site plan for this proposal on July 6, 2020. (See Figure 3.) Comments from that meeting are included in the Analysis section of this report. The attached units are distributed differently than in the previous plan and the detached units are now all located in a row at the east end of the south side of the site. Parking between the office site and the attached units has been extended closer to Rio Road. The sitting garden and dog park have swapped locations near the central Belvedere Blvd. entrance. A dumpster has been added at the southeast corner of the parking lot. The retaining wall at the southeast corner of the site has been extended further west. Figure 1: Aerial view highlighting the subject property. r Figure 2: Street view showing Covenant Church (left) to the northwest of the subject parcel, the subject parcel with the single -story brick residence (center), and the Dunlora residential development to the east (right). �I. a _ j. Figure 3: Initial Site Plan reviewed by the ARB on July 6, 2020. 2 i N 0 m 40 MMIMM Figure 4: Current site plan proposal with revised distribution of residential units. ANALYSIS REF GUIDELINE July 6, 2020 CURRENT ANALYSIS/ISSUE CURRENT RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATION ftrpose 1 The goal of the regulation of the design of development within the Provide architectural Two sets of architectural designs have been See landscaping designated Entrance Corridors is to ensure that new development within designs with the next provided for the attached townhouses. The 3-unit recommendations. the corridors reflects the traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is submittal. The Rio Road- and 4-unit blocks (those closest to the Rio Road the purpose of ARB review and of these Guidelines, that proposed facing elevation of the EC) are identified as the Craig Units, and the 6-unit development within the designated Entrance Corridors reflect elements of office building and the block is identified as the Habitat Units. The design characteristic of the significant historical landmarks, buildings, and Belvedere Boulevard- Belvedere Blvd. -facing elevations of all the units structures of the Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and to promote facing elevations of the have a sufficient level of architectural detailing orderly and attractive development within these corridors. Applicants multi -family units must be such that the elevations do not appear blank or should note that replication of historic structures is neither required nor designed to appear as front undesigned. Side elevations of both unit types have desired. facades, and side elevations visible from the less detail. There are windows at both levels, but the sides are clearly secondary elevations. 13 Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building design should be relieved using design detail or vegetation, or both. EC street must be treated Additional trees west of Lot 1 would help mitigate with architectural detail to impacts. eliminate blankness. 2 Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Charlottesville and None at this time. The proposed designs incorporate sufficient None. Albemarle area experience these sites as ensembles of buildings, land, and elements of traditional residential design (masonry vegetation. In order to accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and and siding materials, gabled roofs, shed dormers, vegetation characteristic of these sites, the Guidelines require attention to grouped windows, porches) to establish four primary factors: compatibility with significant historic sites in the compatibility with the historic residential sites of area; the character of the Entrance Corridor; site development and layout; the county. and landscaping. Compatibility with significant historic sites: None at this time. The proposed brick and siding materials and their distribution across the buildings, the shed and None. 3 New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should respect the traditions of the architecture of historically significant gabled roof forms, the porches supported by simple buildings in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area. Photographs of columns, and the building heights of approximately historic buildings in the area, as well as drawings of architectural features, 30'-33' result in buildings that are expected to be which provide important examples of this tradition are contained in compatible in scale, materials and form with the Atmendix A. area's historic structures. A 25' maximum height is set for the office building, which is also expected 4 The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for building design: the standard of compatibility with the area's historic to be compatible with nearby development. structures is not intended to impose a rigid design solution for new development. Replication of the design of the important historic sites in the area is neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's standard of compatibility can be met through building scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The Guidelines allow individuality in design to accommodate varving tastes as well as special functional requirements. Compatibility with significant historic sites Structure design 9 Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, materials, All the proposed units are two stories tall with a Include brick in the colors and textures should be compatible with the forms and features of the pitched roof. The Craig Units have brick at the first materials list for the Craig significant historic buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited story with siding above, or brick at both stories. Units and indicate the to) the buildings described in Appendix A [of the design guidelines]. The The materials list on the drawings does not identify proposed manufacturer and standard of compatibility can be met through scale, materials, and forms the brick, but a written description identifies it as color in the list. which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as `Blue Ridge Regent." The physical sample has a traditional. The replication of important historic sites in Albemarle County light tan finish. Provide a materials list in is not the objective of these guidelines. the Habitat Units architectural drawings. Paint for the Hardi-siding is Sherwin Williams "Dovetail" — a medium grey. Trim is white and Sherwin Williams Sealskin— a dark grey. Dormers, gables and porch roofs help break up the roofline. The main roofs have black architectural shingles. The Habitat Units are proposed with horizontal Hardi-siding in two very light colors (Cobblestone and Light Mist) at the first and second stories and vertical siding in two dark colors (Mountain Sage and Countrylane Red) at the upper second stories and gable ends. Roofs have black shingles. The colors are generally consistent with those of nearby development. 10 Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of The proposed houses are expected to be compatible buildin s. in height and general character with nearby residential development but will have a different 5 It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to establish a pattern of com atible architectural characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in order to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should scale and character than the existing institutional demonstrate sensitivity to other nearby structures within the Entrance buildings that are nearby. Corridor. Where a designated corridor is substantially developed, these Guidelines require striking a careful balance between harmonizing new The design of the future office building will play a development with the existing character of the corridor and achieving role in establishing compatibility and cohesiveness compatibility with the significant historic sites in the area. along the corridor. 12 Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms, sha es, scale, and materials to create a cohesive whole. 11 The overall design of buildings should have human scale. Scale should be The designs include material changes, grouped None. integral to the building and site design. windows, brick detailing, dormers and porches that hel establish human scale. 14 Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting devices should be Most of the units are attached in three blocks. None. used to unify ou s of buildings within a development. 15 Trademark buildings and related features should be modified to meet the The designs may have been constructed in other None. requirements of the Guidelines. locations, but they do not have the appearance of trademark desi ns. 16 Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be highly tinted or highly The written description of the buildings indicates Provide the specs on the reflective. Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet the that window glass will meet the criteria, but this is window glass. Show that following criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below not noted on the drawings. Visible Light Transmittance 40%. Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%. Specifications (VLT) will not drop below on the proposed window glass should be submitted with the application for 40% and Visible Light final review. Reflectance (VLR) will not exceed 30%. Accessory structures and equipment 17 Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated into the overall Show the location of Ground -mounted equipment is shown just west of Move the equipment plan of development and shall, to the extent possible, be compatible with mechanical equipment the Lot 1 unit. It is surrounded by a screening fence located west of Lot 1 to the building designs used on the site. (building and ground with a height of 4' 5%". A note on the site plan eliminate visibility from the mounted) on the site and indicates that the fence material is wood, but the EC. architectural plans and fence detail on sheet C10 does not identify the show how it will be material. Visibility from the EC would be Add a note to the screening screened from the EC. eliminated if the equipment was located between fence detail on C10 that the units 3 and 4, where other equipment is already fence material is wood. proposed. In the current location west of Lot 1, Indicate the finish. landscaping would be needed to integrate the fenced equipment into the surroundings. Add landscaping on the west side of Lot 1 to establish a cohesive appearance. 18 The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance Provide a detail of the A dog park fence detail has been provided. It Add shrubs and a tree along Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting, these features will still have a proposed dog park fencing shows a 4'-tall fence composed of wire mesh the Belvedere Blvd. negative visual impact on the Entrance Corridor street, screening should be in the site plan. Chain link behind horizontal wooden slats. Wire mesh has a frontage of the dog park. provided to eliminate visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. Refuse fencing is not appropriate. similar appearance to chain link. However, the dog areas, d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment, park is located approximately 200' from the EC f Above -ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, razor wire, and beyond two blocks of townhouses as viewed and similar security fencing devices. from the EC. The location will reduce visibility of the wire mesh and the wooden slats help minimize 19 Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings and surrounding natural vegetation and may consist of. a. Walls, b. impacts. Adding a tree and shrubs along the Plantings, and c. Fencing. Belvedere Blvd. frontage of the dog park would further limit impacts. 21 The following note should be added to the site plan and the architectural plan: Include the standard The note is not on the architectural plans. Include the standard "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall mechanical equipment mechanical equipment note be eliminated." note on the architectural on the architectural plans. tans. 22- Lighting None at this time. No lighting is proposed. None. 31 Landscaping 7 The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping are intended to Provide a complete plant Along Rio Road, street trees are proposed in the Add a large shade tree reflect the landscaping characteristic of many of the area's significant schedule with the next right-of-way. Four large shade trees (American along the Rio Rd. frontage historic sites which is characterized by large shade trees and lawns. submittal. Elm Princeton) alternate with three ornamental for a total of 5 large shade Landscaping should promote visual order within the Entrance Corridor and trees (Saucer Magnolias). One additional large trees. help to integrate buildings into the existing environment of the corridor. Provide confirmation that easements will not conflict shade tree is required. The large trees are not provided at the required caliper. One of the Revise the planting size of 8 Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting different types of plant materials that share similar characteristics. Such with the proposed/required ornamentals is located over a water line. the large shade trees along common elements allow for more flexibility in the design of structures landscaping. Rio Road to 3%" caliper. because common landscape features will help to harmonize the appearance of development as seen from the street upon which the Corridor is Resolve the ornamental centered. tree/water line conflict along the Rio Road 32 Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor streets should include the following: frontage. a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the Entrance Corridor Street. Such trees should be at least 3% inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 35 feet on center. b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be interspersed among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. The ornamental trees need not alternate one for one with the laze shade trees. They may be planted among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing pattern. c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or low stone wall, typical of the area, should align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor street. d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing plantings and fencing should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive of road right-of-way and utility easements. 33 Landscaping along interior roads: Reduce the spacing of the Ten large shade trees are required along Belvedere None. a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior roads. Such trees proposed trees along Blvd. Eleven trees are provided. Eight are proposed should be at least 2% inches caliper (measured six inches above the Belvedere Boulevard to within 6' x 6' landscape easements. Four of these ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees 40' on center. easements are bounded by the retaining walls that should be located at least every 40 feet on center. front the Craig units, the townhouses themselves, and the sidewalk. This is a tight space, but may be sufficient for the Princeton Sentry cultivar that is specified. 34 Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways: Identify the landscaping The landscaped courtyard is associated with the None at this time. a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior pedestrian ways. proposed in the landscaped office building, which is scheduled for a future Such trees should be at least 2% inches caliper (measured six inches above courtyard. phase of development. Plants proposed for the the ground) and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees courtyard are not shown at this time, but street should be located at least every 25 feet on center. trees are proposed along Rio Road. Sidewalks are provided along the eastern parking row, along the central entrance road into the site, and along the south side of Lots 1-7. Trees are provided along some of these paths, but not consistently (due primarily to the location of utilities). 35 Landscaping of parking areas: Provide a complete plant In the initial site plan, trees were provided on both Show the landscaping that a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, located 40 feet schedule with the next the east and west sides of the eastern parking row. is proposed in the screening on center. Trees should be planted in the interior of parking areas at the submittal. The current plan includes notes stating that areas on the northeast and rate of one tree for every 10 parking spaces provided and should be evenly screening will be provided along the northeast and southeast sides of the site distributed throughout the interior of the parking area. southeast sides of the site in accordance with the so that it may be reviewed b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should measure 2% inches Code of Development. The planting widths vary for consistency with the caliper (measured six inches above the ground); should be evenly spaced; from 2' to 6'. The Code of Development requires guidelines. and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be that the design of the screening be coordinated with planted in planters or medians sufficiently large to maintain the health of adjacent residential property owners. the tree and shall be protected by curbing. 10 c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking area's impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24 inches in heipht. 36 Landscaping of buildings and other structures: Consider adding One tree has been added at the south corner of Lot Add trees and low planting a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the front of long landscaping at the comer 1. Multiple utilities cross the area between Lot 1 in the area between the buildings as necessary to soften the appearance of exterior walls. The of the site between the and Rio Road, but low planting could help developed portion of the spacing, size, and type of such trees or vegetation should be determined by office building and the Lot integrate the development. Additional trees would site and Rio Road to help the length, height, and blankness of such walls. 1-2 building to help the help mitigate the reduced level of detail on the Lot establish a cohesive overall b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other visual transition between 1 townhouse side elevation. development. structures; dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thru" the varying building uses windows; service areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24 and characters. inches in height. 37 Plant species: a. Plant species required should be as approved by the Staff Provide a complete plant A plant schedule has been provided. The species None. based upon but not limited to the Generic Landscape Plan Recommended schedule with the next are found on the various lists. Species List and Native Plants or Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D . submittal. 38 Plant health: The following note should be added to the landscape plan: "All Add the standard The note is on the plan. None. site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be landscaping note to the maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs landscape plan. and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant. - Development attern; Site development and layout 6 Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural landscape and None. All existing trees would be removed from the site None. should contribute to the creation of an organized development plan. This with this proposal. Rolling terrain would not be may be accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the trees and evident. Trees are proposed along the streets. rolling terrain typical of the area; planting new trees along streets and Building mass and height are not expected to pedestrian ways and choosing species that reflect native forest elements; appear out of scale with the surroundings. insuring that any grading will blend into the surrounding topography thereby creating a continuous landscape; preserving, to the extent practical, existing significant river and stream valleys which may be located on the site and integrating these features into the design of surrounding development; and limiting the building mass and height to a scale that does not overpower the natural settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor. 39 The relationship of buildings and other structures to the Entrance Corridor See # L The development has a generally organized None. street and to other development within the corridor should be as follows: character. The residential units are oriented parallel a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, and pedestrian to the streets. Internal sidewalks would connect to a walks should guide the layout of the site. path along Belvedere Blvd. and Rio Road. There are no connecting open spaces. All existing trees n b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor street should be would be removed to accommodate the parallel to the street. Building groupings should be arranged to parallel the development. Views are not expected to be Entrance Corridor street. negatively impacted. c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems. d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity within the Entrance Corridor. e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys, steep slopes, significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If the provisions of Section 32.5.2.n of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements required by that section should be located so as to maximize the use of existing features in screening such improvements from Entrance Corridor streets. f. The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views and vistas on and around the site. Site Grading 40 Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site to surrounding Identify the retaining wall Proposed grading increases the slope along the Rio Indicate retaining wall conditions by limiting the use of retaining walls and by shaping the terrain heights on the grading frontage and places the townhouses and parking material(s) and color(s) on through the use of smooth, rounded land forms that blend with the existing plan. area approximately 10' above the EC elevation. the plan. A physical sample terrain. Steep cut or fill sections are generally unacceptable. Proposed The elevation at the street is 468'. The parking lot may be necessary for contours on the grading plan shall be rounded with a ten -foot minimum Indicate retaining wall closest to the EC is at an elevation of 475'. The Lot review. radius where they meet the adjacent condition. Final grading should achieve a material(s) and color(s) on 1 townhouse has a finished floor elevation of 478'. natural, rather than engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height the plan. A physical and taller, when necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend with the sample may be necessary Retaining walls along the northeast and southeast landscape. for review. sides of the site are proposed at 4' and 6' tall. Materials are not indicated. Once the residential units are constructed, the retaining walls will have little visual im act on the EC. 41 No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the drip line of any None. There are no trees that are designated for None. trees or other existing features designated for preservation in the final preservation. Certificate of Appropriateness. Adequate tree protection fencing should be shown on, and coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and erosion and sediment control plans. 42 Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness should be clearly delineated and protected on the site prior to any grading activity on the site. This protection should remain in lace until com letion of the development of the site. 12 43 Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy e ui ment within this area. 20 Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be designed to fit into None. No above -ground stormwater features are None. the natural topography to avoid the need for screening. When visible from proposed. the Entrance Corridor street, these features must be fully integrated into the landscape. They should not have the appearance of engineered features. 44 Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new drainage patterns) should be incorporated into the finished site to the extent possible. f.Ylhj113F111WO) 9SD[KIh51u1DI►117_VY[00 Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion: 1. The two architectural designs 2. Landscaping along Rio Rd. and Belvedere Blvd. 3. Equipment on the Rio Rd. side of Lot 1. Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. Include brick in the materials list for the Craig Units and indicate the proposed manufacturer and color in the list. 2. Provide a materials list in the Habitat Units architectural drawings. 3. Provide the specs on the window glass. Show that Visible Light Transmittance (VLT) will not drop below 40% and Visible Light Reflectance (VLR) will not exceed 30%. 4. Move the equipment located west of Lot 1 to eliminate visibility from the EC. 5. Add a note to the screening fence detail on C10 that the fence material is wood. Indicate the finish. 6. Add landscaping on the west side of Lot 1 to establish a cohesive appearance. 7. Add shrubs and a tree along the Belvedere Blvd. frontage of the dog park. 8. Include the standard mechanical equipment note on the architectural plans: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated." 9. Add a large shade tree along the Rio Rd. frontage for a total of 5 large shade trees. 10. Revise the planting size of the large shade trees along Rio Road to 3%" caliper. 11. Resolve the ornamental tree/water line conflict along the Rio Road frontage. 12. Show the landscaping that is proposed in the screening areas on the northeast and southeast sides of the site so that it may be reviewed for consistency with the guidelines. 13. Add trees and low planting in the area between the developed portion of the site and Rio Road to help establish a cohesive overall development. 14. Indicate retaining wall material(s) and color(s) on the plan. A physical sample may be necessary for review. ATTACHMENTS Attach. 1: ARB2021-27: 999 Rio Road combined site and architectural drawings 13 TABLE A This report is based on the following submittal items: Sheet # I Drawing Name Drawing /Revision Date 999 Rio Road Final Site Plan 2/22/2021 SHEET INDEX C1 COVER C2 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2 SITE PLAN C4 UTILITY PLAN C& OFF -SITE SEWER CONNECTION CS UTILITY PROFILES C7 GRADING PLAN CS AMENITY & LANDSCAPE PLAN Ce SITE, VDOT&ACSA DETAILS C70 SITE, VDOT & ACSA DETAILS C11 ACSA DETAILS C12 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC Habitat For Humanity Townhomes Madagascar 6/19/2017 CS COVER SHEET A.) FOUNDATION & BASEMENT PLAN A.2 FIRST FLOOR PLAN -STAIR SECTIONS A.3 FIRST FLOOR LAYOUT PLANS AA SECOND FLOOR & ROOF PLANS A.5.1 SECOND FLOOR LAYOUT PLANS A.5.2 SECOND FLOOR LAYOUT PLANS A.6 ELEVATIONS -WINDOW TYPES A.7 ELEVATIONS -SECTIONS -DETAILS AS PORCH SECTIONS A.9 PORCH SECTIONS A.10 SECTIONS -DETAILS A.11 SECTIONS -DETAILS 1-9 999 Rio Townhouses — Craig Units: 3-unit building front & back elevation and upper & lower floor plans; 4-unit building front & back elevation and upper 2-12-2021 & lower floorplans; 3- and 4-unit buildings right & left elevations Rezoning project proposal; EC Plan proposal; Sherwin Williams stain color print SW 3507 Riverwood; HFHGC Architectural Products sheets (2) with Madagascar elevations and Hardiplank Mountain Sage, Countrylane Red, Cobblestone and Light Mist color prints; comment response letter; images (2) showing low wall along street/sidewalk; Hardiplank samples in Mountain Sage, Countrylane Red, Cobblestone and Light Mist; Brick sample: General Shale Blue Ridge Regent 14 OFA.0 1111 Architectural Review Board o/.� County of Albemarle Meeting Agenda for April 5, 2021 —44010 Community Development Department Virtual Meeting lecix1.� 1. Call to order 2. Establish a Quorum 3. Disclosures 4. Public Comment 5. Consent Agenda—None 6. Regular Review Items a. ARB-2020-112: Pet Supplies Plus Comprehensive Sian Plan Staff: Khris Taggart KAA-c.4 — b. ARB-2021-27: 999 Rio Road Staff: Margaret Maliszewski c. ARB-2021-26: Green Clean Car Wash Staff: Khris Taggart 7. Work Session a. ARB-2021-09: Caliber Collision: Rooftop equipment, fence design 8. Other Business a. ARB-2020-69: Sleep Number: Building materials b. EC Guidelines Discussion: I-64 (west end) c. Approval of Minutes: March 15, 2021 d. Next ARB Meeting: April 19, 2021, 1:00 PM -VIRTUAL MEETING NOTES REGARDING PUBLIC MEETINGS 1 This meeting is being held pursuant to and in compliance with Ordinance No. 20-A(16), An Ordinance to Ensure the Continuity of Government During the COVID-19 Disaster.The opportunities for the public to access and participate in the electronic meeting are posted on the Albemarle County website on the Albemarle County calendar Participation will include the opportunity to comment on those matters for which comments from the public will be received 2. Each applicant is allowed to make a single presentation not exceeding 15 minutes in length. The applicant may divide the 15-minute allotment among various presenters,but the total presentation time will not exceed 15 minutes. 3. Each member of the general public who wishes to speak on a matter shall be allowed one appearance not to exceed 3 minutes. 4. Any person aggrieved by any decision of the Architectural Review Board may demand a review of the application by the Board of Supervisors. Such demand shall be made by filing a request therefore in writing with the clerk of the Board of Supervisors within ten calendar days of the date of such decision For additional information see section 30.6.8 of the Zoning Ordinance. NOTES REGARDING ARB ACTIONS 1. Certificates of Appropriateness are valid for the same period that the correspondmg site plan is valid If there is no site plan required for the proposed work,the Certificate of Appropriateness is valid for 3 years. Applicants requesting an extension of the period of validity must do so in writing.The letter must be received by the Director of Planning prior to the expiration date.