The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSUB202100039 Correspondence 2021-04-13 (2)ENGINEERING SUB202100039 Foxchase Landing (20051024) Review Department: Planning Reviewer: Kevin McCollum County Comments 3/31/2021: 1. [14-302 (A)(4), 14-302 (A)(5), and 14-303 (L)] Please show all existing easements and state their recorded instrument number, Include the instrument number for State Route 1854 (Carlyle PI). 41612021 Reply: All existing easements on lots are currently shown off site easements that do not affect these lots have been added Carlyle Place has the State Route already shown under the 40' right of way. 2. [14-302(A), 14-302(B),18-13.3] The acreage and total square footage of Lots 6-8 suggest Bonus Level Cluster Development is being utilized. Cluster provisions require 25% open space and Bonus Factors are required for the increased density. Please identify as notes which bonus factors are being utilized. 41612021 Reply: These lots were shown in the original approved planned in 2010 and have not changed since that time. They are included in the exhibit for the HOA recorded on 111812011, DB 3988, PG 569-597 a. Is Note # 10 intended to demonstrate that existing wooded areas are being maintained in accordance with Section 18-13.4.1? If so, state the percentage of existing wooded areas being maintained, and state the corresponding percentage density increase gained. For example, if 10% of the site area is being maintained, a 5% bonus density increase is permitted. 41612021 Reply: Existing wooded space is included in the Open Space areas, not the residual areas. b. Is the conservation plan mentioned in Note 410 a recorded instrument? 41612021 Reply: It was approved by the county with the first construction plan. 3. [18-2.2.3] Please provide evidence that enough open space is being provided to meet cluster development standards. Either 25% of this "phase" needs to create 25% open space on the phase acreage, or the entire Foxchase Landing needs to have 25% open space after platting of these three lots. 41612021 Reply: Lot 8, is the only lot size that has changed and it's smaller. The lots appear to have been rounded down in acres when plans were I" submitted The square footage is the same. I have added a table showing all the existing lots and the Open Space, there is over 28% open space total 4. [14-302(A)(11)] Please update the existing open space parcel labels so that they state the TMP, acreage, and recorded instrument numbers. 41612021 Reply: Corrected 5. [14-302(B)] According to Albemarle County GIS Data, the property is located in the Lickinghole Creek Water Supply Watershed, not the South Fork Rivanna Reservoir Water Supply Watershed. Please update the applicable notes on the Plat to reflect this. 41612021 Reply: Corrected 6. [14-303 (E)] Please clarify the curve lines that are being measured for curves C3 and C4. They appear to start and end at the same monuments at the front of Lot 7, but the curve line table states different measurements for each curve. 41612021 Reply: C3 is the total curve, extra node has been removed and (T) has been added to C3. 7. [14-302(B), 18-3.1, 18-4.191 The development of the property does not meet the definition of infill outlined in the Zoning Ordinance and therefore the applicable setbacks JASDSK]PROJ\2005102APublished Files\PDFASubmittal Sets\tech check lots 6, 7 & 8\2nd\county response letter.docx ASK US HOW. Park West Circle, Suite 108, Midlothian, Virginia 23114 804-748-9011 Fax 804-748-2590 www.cctownes.com would be the non-infill setbacks as described in Section 4.19. Please correct the Setbacks requirements note. a. Infill. "Infill" means, as used in section 4.19, when 40 percent or more, in the aggregate, of the residentially zoned lots fronting on a street are developed within 500 feet in both directions of the subject lot having less than 120 feet of frontage on the same street at the time that it is developed, and development of the subject lot begins more than five years after the date: (i) the final subdivision plat that created the lot was recorded in the Clerk's office of the Circuit Court of the County; of (ii) the final site plan depicting the development of the lot was approved by the County. 41612021 Reply: Corrected 8. [14-317] Have HOA covenants ever been recorded to put ownership of open space/common areas to an HOA? According to Albemarle County GIS, the exiting open space parcels are owned by Southern Classic. Section 18-4.7 (d) state that "Open space in private ownership shall be subject to a legal instrument ensuring the maintenance and preservation of the open space that is approved by the agent and the county attorney in conjunction with the approval of the subdivision plat or site plan. "If no HOA covenants or other legal instruments have been recorded to comply with this requirement, a legal instrument will need to be prepared, reviewed, and approved as part of this final plat approval. 41612021 Reply: HOA recorded on 111812011, DB 3988, PG 569-597 9. [14-302(A), 18-4.2] Albemarle County GIS data shows the presence of critical slopes on these lots. Please shown them on the plat to ensure there are adequate building sites that comply with Section 4.2.1 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. 41612021 Reply. field survey done, and critical slope located infield Review Department: Engineer Reviewer: Emily Cox County Comments 3/31/2021: 1. Please see comment number 9 above. Critical slopes may influence the buildable areas on these sites. 41612021 Reply: Critical Slope from field survey location added Review Department: E911 Reviewer: Elise Kiewra County Comments 3/31/2021: 1. No Objection 41612021 Reply: Noted, Thank you Review Department: Inspections Reviewer: Betty Slough County Comments 3/31/2021: 1. No Objection 41612021 Reply: Noted Thank you Review Department: ARB Reviewer: Margaret Maliszewski County Comments 3/31/2021: 1. No Objection 41612021 Reply: Noted, Thank you Review Department: Fire & Rescue Reviewer: Howard Lagomarsino County Comments 3/31/2021: JASDSKPROJ\2005102APublished Files\PDFASubmittal Sets\tech check lots 6, 7 & 8\2nd\county response letter.docx ASK US HOW. 1 Park West Circle, Suite 108, Midlothian, Virginia 23114 804-748-9011 Fax 804-748-2590 www.cctownes.com ENGINEERING 1. No Objection 41612021 Reply: Noted, Thank you Review Department: ACSA Reviewer: Richard Nelson County Comments 3/31/2021: 1. Review pending. Comments will be forwarded to the Applicant upon receipt. 41612021 Reply: Noted Review Department: VDOT Reviewer: Max Greene County Comments 3/31/2021: 1. No Objection see attached. 41612021 Reply: Noted, Thankyou 2. The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Townes Site Engineering, dated 8 February 2021, and find it to be. 41612021 Reply. Noted, Thank you Review Department: RWSA Reviewer: Victoria Fort County Comments 3/31/2021: 1. Review pending. Comments will be forwarded to the Applicant upon receipt. 41612021 Reply: Noted JASDSKPROJ\2005102APublished Files\PDFASubmittal Sets\tech check lots 6, 7 & 8\2nd\county response letter.docx ASK US HOW. Park West Circle, Suite 108, Midlothian, Virginia 23114 804-748-9011 Fax 804-748-2590 www.cctownes.com