The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP202100013 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2021-04-16�� OF ALB GIRGIN1P47 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Memorandum To: Scott Collins, Collins Engineering (scott@collins-en ing eering com) From: Mariah Gleason Division: Community Development — Planning Date: April 16, 2021 Subject: SDP202100013 Glenbrook at Foothill Crossing Phase V — Final Site Plan The final site plan referenced above has been reviewed by the Planning Services Division of the Albemarle County Department of Community Development (CDD) and by other members of the Site Review Committee (SRC). The Planner will approve the plan when the following items (from the Planner and from other SRC plan reviewers) have been satisfactorily addressed and when all SRC plan reviewers have indicated in writing their tentative approvals. [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. [Comment] Stream buffer. Please confirm the source of the stream buffer location. Please note, the stream buffer location must be based on an official survey or Albemarle County GIS and the linework needs to be consistent across all plans/plats for this development. 2. [32.5.2(i)] Sidewalk easement. An off -site easement on TMP 56A2-1-72A (Claudius Crozet Park) will be needed to facilitate the sidewalk connection from this development to the existing sidewalk in Crozet Park. Please submit an easement to the County for review. This easement must be recorded and noted on the site plan prior to final site plan approval. 3. [32.7.9] Landscape plan. a. Thank you for aligning the plan map with the plant legend. Please also revise the Shumard Oak line item, as the botanical name and common name seem to be switched. b. Comparing the final site plan with the approved initial site plan, the placement and extent of the proposed streets did not change between submissions. Staff understands the total street frontage for Indigo Rd was reduced by the removal of off -site frontage areas, however, what informed the reduction of the total street frontage along Crimson St? c. Please update the "Total Site Area" to 5.842 so the subsequent landscape calculations are based off the same property acreage provided on Sheet 1, instead of 5.841. The noted site acreage should remain consistent throughout the entire document. d. Remove or adjust "proposed street trees (typ.)" label from Lot 4. It does not currently point to a tree on the plan. 4. [32.5.2(i)] Streets. a. On Sheet 3, provide a typical right-of-way width measurement on Crimson St for areas where on -street parking is proposed. b. The plan map on Sheet 3 shows an on -street parking space width of 8ft along Indigo Rd, while the cross- section for Indigo Rd, provided on Sheet 9, notes a 9ft parking space width. Revise the plan to consistently note/depict at least a 9ft on -street parking space width. c. Similarly, the plan map on Sheet 3 depicts an on -street parking space width of 9ft along Crimson St, while the cross section for Crimson St, provided on Sheet 9, shows and notes an 8ft on -street parking space width. Revise the plan to consistently note/depict at least a 9ft on -street parking space width. d. On Sheet 3, please revise the emergency access DB/PG labels (on TMP 56-57133 and TMP 56-57B1) to identify the path by the same proposed language that is used by the easement plats: "20' Emergency Access Road and Bicycle & Pedestrian Path Easement". 5. [Comment] Recreation plan. In conversations and materials that were shared by the applicant/developer team, it seems the development might be exploring an amended recreation plan. If the development decides to move forward with an alternative plan or offering of amenities, please provide a recreation substitution request in a future submittal and integrate the proposed amenities (trails, equipment, etc) into the site plan and easement plat. 6. [32.5.2(a)] Overlay district. In the zoning notes on Sheet 1, revise the "Managed Slopes Overlay District" to "Managed Steep Slopes Overlay District". 7. [32.5.2(n)] Buildingfootprint. Provide the typical building footprint square footage in the unit type layout graphic, or another appropriate area on the plan. 8. [32.5.2(a)] Abuttingproperty. Label and provide information for TMP 56A2-4-A4. 9. [Comment] Benchmarks. Provided reference benchmarks used for surveys, if not provided already. 10. [32.5.2(i)] Easements. Easements needed to facilitate this development must be recorded and noted on the final site plan prior to final site plan approval. It appears many placeholders have already been included in the plan sets. Staff anticipates this information will be provided once it is known. OTHER SRC REVIEWERS Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer) Matthew Wentland, mwentland&albemarle.org— Requests changes 1. A road plan amendment will need to be submitted and approved prior to plan approval. 2. Label all blank DB&PG references after the plat has been approved. Albemarle County Information Services (E911) Elise Kiewra, ekiewra"bemarle.org—No Objection Albemarle County Building Inspections Betty Slough, bslough(i�albemarle.org—No Objection Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue Howard Lagomarsino, hlaeomarsino(a,,albemarle.org — No Objection Albemarle County Service Authority Richard Nelson, melson(a),serviceauthoritv.org — No Objection Virginia Department of Transportation Adam Moore, adam.mooreavdot.virginia.eov — See recommendation provided in the attached comment letter In accordance with the provisions of Section 32.4.3.5 of Chapter 18 of the Code, if the applicant fails to submit a revised site plan to address all of the requirements within six (6) months after the date of this letter, the application shall be deemed to have been voluntarily withdrawn by the applicant. Please contact Mariah Gleason in the Planning Division by using meleason e albemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext. 3097 for further information. CC: Jeremy W. Swink swinkiw(a),stanleymartin.com Gregg P.O'Donnell odonnellgp stanleymartin.com (Z) COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Stephen C. Brich, P.E. 1401 East Broad Street Commissioner Richmond, Virginia 23219 February 25, 2021 Marian Gleason County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Re: SDP-2021-00013 - Glenbrook at Foothill Crossing Phase 5 — FSP Dear Ms. Gleason: (804) 786-2701 Fax: (804) 786,2940 The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section, has reviewed the above referenced Glenbrook at Foothill Crossing Phase 5 — FSP, as submitted by Collins Engineering, dated February 15, 2021 and find it to be generally acceptable. The road plans will need to be revised to match this change to the site plan. A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right of way. The owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency land Use Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process. If you have further questions please contact Max Greene at (434) 422-9894. Sincerely, Adam J. Moore, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Charlottesville Residency VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING