Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB202100042 Staff Report 2021-05-12ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Project #/Name ARB-2021-42: Starbucks Final Site Plan Review Type Final Site Plan and Review of Architecture Parcel Identification 045B1-05-OA-01100 Location 2231 Seminole Trail Zoned Highway Commercial (HC), Airport Impact Area (AIA), Entrance Corridor (EC) Owner/Applicant Commercial Rentals LLC/Timmons Group (Craig Kotarski) Magisterial District Rio Proposal To demolish an existing office building to construct a 1,138 sq. ft. building to accommodate a drive-thru Starbucks in addition to associated site improvements on approximately .70 acres. Context The subject property is comprised of an existing 2%-story office building that is set back approximately 143 feet from the road. A landscaped lawn and a paved parking lot are located between the building and the Rt. 29 Entrance Corridor. This portion of Route 29 is largely characterized by commercial development with nearby developments including Walmart to the west, car dealerships to the northwest, and a gas station to the north. Residential properties are directly adjacent to the east (Fig. 1). Visibility The proposed development will be readily visible from the Route 29 Entrance Corridor. ARB Meeting Date May 17, 2021 Staff Contact Khris Taggart PROJECT HISTORY The ARB provided comments on the preliminary architecture and recommended approval without conditions on the initial site plan on March 1, 2021. ANALYSIS REF GUIDELINE COMMENTS 3/1/21 ISSUES 5/17/21 RECOMMENDATIONS 5/17/21 GENERAL, GUIDELINES Purpose; Compatibility with significant historic sites, Compatibility with the character of the Entrance Corridor; Structure Design 1 The goal of the regulation of the design of development within the Provide samples for all materials Material and color samples have been provided. Other None. designated Entrance Corridors is to ensure that new development within and colors. than the removal of the conceptual mural, no changes have the corridors reflects the traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it been made to the building design since the preliminary is the purpose of ARB review and of these Guidelines, that proposed submission. The design remains contemporary in nature development within the designated Entrance Corridors reflect elements with a basic connection to the historic architecture of the of design characteristic of the significant historical landmarks, County. This connection is demonstrated in the buildings, and structures of the Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and commercial building form seen at the front of the building to promote orderly and attractive development within these corridors. and materials (brick and wood) that were used historically Applicants should note that replication of historic structures is neither throughout the County. In the previous staff report staff required nor desired. noted that the bond pattern (stack), brick color (gray), and strong texture of the walls contributed to an appearance 2 Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area experience these sites as ensembles of buildings, land, that was somewhat utilitarian in nature. However, the and vegetation. In order to accomplish the integration of buildings, land, samples provided illustrate a brick color, that while is not and vegetation characteristic of these sites, the Guidelines require the historic red brick, is one with a warmer tone that will attention to four primary factors: compatibility with significant historic be compatible with the surrounding context. sites in the area; the character of the Entrance Corridor; site development and layout; and landscaping. 3 New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should respect the traditions of the architecture of historically significant buildings in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings in the area, as well as drawings of architectural features, which provide important examples of this tradition are contained in Appendix A. 4 The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for building design: the standard of compatibility with the area's historic structures is not intended to impose a rigid design solution for new development. Replication of the design of the important historic sites in the area is neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's standard of compatibility can be met through building scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The Guidelines allow individuality in design to accommodate varying tastes as well as special functional requirements. 5 It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to establish a pattern of compatible architectural characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in order to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should demonstrate sensitivity to other nearby structures within the Entrance Corridor. Where a designated corridor is substantially developed, these Guidelines require striking a careful balance between harmonizing new development with the existing character of the corridor and achieving compatibility with the significant historic sites in the area. 9 Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, materials, colors and textures should be compatible with the forms and features of the significant historic buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to) the buildings described in Appendix A [of the design guidelines]. The standard of compatibility can be met through scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The replication of important historic sites in Albemarle County is not the objective of these guidelines. 13 Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building design should Eliminate the mural from the The mural has been eliminated from the proposal. None. be relieved using design detail or vegetation, or both. proposal. The applicant may return in the future following ARB establishment of mural guidelines. 10 Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of None. The building has a simple form like many of the buildings None. buildings. in the surrounding area. As viewed from the EC, human scale is enhanced by the metal canopy/column/screen structure which adds interest at the west end of the building, and by the outdoor seating area with benches on the EC -facing side. In the previous staff report staff noted 11 The overall design of buildings should have human scale. Scale should be integral to the building and site design. that the focus on human scale did not appear to transition to the eastern end of the building. However, at the March 1 meeting, the ARB was satisfied with the scale of the building. 12 Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms, shapes, scale, and materials to create a cohesive whole. 14 Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting devices should None. A single building is proposed, so a connecting device is None. be used to unify groups of buildings within a development. not necessary. 15 Trademark buildings and related features should be modified to meet the None. The canopy is proposed in the standard Starbucks dark None. requirements of the Guidelines. green color, and the wood cladding seems to be part of Starbucks' current materials palette but the overall building design does not have a trademark feel. 16 Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be highly tinted or None. The window glass note is not present on the architectural Add the standard window highly reflective. Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet drawings. glass note to the drawings. the following criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 40%. Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%. Specifications on the proposed window glass should be submitted with the application for final review. Accessorystructures and equipment 17 Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated into the Provide details regarding the drive- No detailed drawings or color specifications have been Provide as part of the site overall plan of development and shall, to the extent possible, be thru related items. Revise the plan provided on the drive-thru related items. The color plan detail drawings and compatible with the building designs used on the site. to indicate the color of the drive- renderings illustrate the drive-thru related items in black. color specifications for the thru related items. Colors that are The black color helps mitigate the visibility of these items. clearance bar and order compatible with the building design Detail drawings and color specifications will be needed to point canopy. and that minimize the visibility of confirm. these elements from the EC would be appropriate. 18 The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance Show the location of mechanical The location(s) of mechanical equipment is not labeled on Show the location of Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting, these features will still have a equipment (building and ground the site plan. The architectural plans have been revised to rooftop and wall -mounted negative visual impact on the Entrance Corridor street, screening should be mounted) on the site and show the location of the roof -mounted mechanical equipment on the provided to eliminate visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. architectural plans and show how it equipment; however, it is still unclear whether it will be architectural elevations. Refuse areas, d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment, will be screened from the EC. visible from the EC. Show the location of f. Above -ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, razor ground -mounted equipment wire, and similar security fencing devices. Revise the dumpster enclosure detail to specify materials that are The applicant response letter notes that the dumpster enclosure is to be CMIJ block clad in brick to match the on the site plan, or indicate that no ground equipment is 19 Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings and surrounding natural vegetation and may consist of: a. Walls, b. compatible with the building and building. However, no changes have been made to the proposed. Plantings, and c. Fencing. appropriate for the EC. dumpster enclosure detail in the site plan. Materials and colors coordinated with those approved for the building Revise the dumpster would be appropriate. enclosure detail to specify materials that are compatible with the building and appropriate for the EC. 21 The following note should be added to the site plan and the architectural Add the standard mechanical The standard mechanical equipment note is present on the Add the standard plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance equipment note to the architectural site plan but not the architectural drawings. mechanical equipment note Corridor shall be eliminated." drawings. to the architectural drawings. Lighting 22 Light should be contained on the site and not spill over onto adjacent Provide a lighting plan with the A lighting plan has been provided with this submission. None. properties or streets; next submittal. The lighting does not exceed .5 footcandles over any public roadways or adjacent properties. 23 Light should be shielded, recessed or flush -mounted to eliminate glare. The photometric plan shows maximum lighting levels (4.1 Revise the photometric plan All fixtures with lamps emitting 3000 lumens or more must be full fc) well below the Guideline's maximum. However, the to include footcandle values cutoff fixtures. building -mounted and bollard lighting shown on sheet A151 of the architectural drawings and sheet CL3 of the and cutsheet information for the bollard and building - 24 Light levels exceeding 30 footcandles are not appropriate for display lots in the Entrance Coffidors. Lower light levels will apply to most site plan does not appear to be accounted for in the mounted lighting. other uses in the Entrance Corridors. photometrics, no information on the fixtures is provided in the luminaire schedule, and no cutsheets have been Note the lumen levels for provided in the plans. The canopy lighting on sheet A151 the bollard lighting on the includes LED strip lighting. Lighting that outlines a plan. Fixtures that emit structure or part thereof is not permitted. Details on strip 3000 or more lumens must light installation are needed to determine if the fixtures be full cutoff fixtures. can be approved. Provide details to clarify the The LLF of the proposed fixtures is less than 1.0. installation of the strip light fixtures. Revise the photometric plan using an LFF of 1.0 for all fixtures. 25 Light should have the appearance of white light with a warm soft glow; The color temperature of the site lighting has not been Revise the photometric plan however, a consistent appearance throughout a site or development is indicated on the plans. to specify a color required. Consequently, if existing lamps that emit non -white light are temperature between 2000k to remain, new lamps may be required to match them. and 3000k for the site lighting. 26 Dark brown, dark bronze, or black are appropriate colors for free- The color of the light fixtures has not been indicated on Indicate the color of the standing pole mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors. the plans. proposed fixtures on the plans. 27 The height and scale of freestanding, pole -mounted light fixtures should be compatible with the height and scale of the buildings and the sites Height is included in the photometric plan, but there is no they are illuminating, and with the use of the site. Typically, the height information on whether or not the site lights are to be Include a note on the of freestanding pole -mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors mounted on bases. lighting plan indicating that should not exceed 20 feet, including the base. Fixtures that exceed 20 the 20' maximum height of feet in height will typically require additional screening to achieve an the pole -mounted fixtures appropriate appearance from the Entrance Corridor. includes any base. 28 In determining the appropriateness of lighting fixtures for the Entrance Corridors, the individual context of the site will be taken into consideration on a case by case basis. 29 The following note should be included on the lighting plan: "Each A version of the lighting note is on the photometric plan. Revise the photometric plan outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial to add the standard lighting lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded note. to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle." 30-31 Guidelines for the Use of Decorative Landscape Lighting Provide a lighting plan with the No decorative landscape lighting is proposed. None. next submittal. Landsc in 7 The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping are intended Revise the landscape plan to add an The width of the travelway at the south end of the site has Revise the landscape plan to reflect the landscaping characteristic of many of the area's significant additional tree along the frontage to been reduced, allowing for two additional large trees to be to remove the London Plane historic sites which is characterized by large shade trees and lawns. achieve more consistent spacing provided along the western perimeter of the site. While the tree at the northwest comer Landscaping should promote visual order within the Entrance Corridor and meet the minimum planting spacing still exceeds 40' near the travelway at the north of the parking area. and help to integrate buildings into the existing environment of the requirement. end of the site, the trees provided along the western corridor. perimeter exceeds the minimum planting requirement (four trees). The species, layout, and limited planting area 8 Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting different types of plant materials that share similar characteristics. Such along this perimeter will likely result in over -crowded common elements allow for more flexibility in the design of structures trees. Removing the London Plane tree at the northwest because common landscape features will help to harmonize the corner of the parking area, due to the size of the tree at appearance of development as seen from the street upon which the maturity and potential conflicts with surrounding Corridor is centered. hardscapes, would be appropriate and would still meet the minimum planting requirement. 32 Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor streets should include the following: a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the Entrance Corridor Given the limited planting area provided, the location of Street. Such trees should be at least 3% inches caliper (measured 6 any freestanding sign that may be wanted, and its inches above the ground) and should be of a plant species common to associated landscaping, should be considered now to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 35 feet on center. ensure an appropriate appearance along the EC. (Note that b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be sign locations are approved with sign permit applications.) interspersed among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. The ornamental trees need not alternate one for one with the large shade trees. They may be planted among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing pattern. c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or low stone wall, typical of the area, should align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor street. d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing plantings and fencing should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive of road right-of-way and utility easements. 33 Landscaping along interior roads: a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior roads. Such trees should be at least 2% inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 40 feet on center. 34 Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways: Revise the landscape plan to show The landscape plan has been revised to show large trees, Revise the landscape plan a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior pedestrian large trees, at 40' on center and 2%" that meet the spacing and caliper requirements, in the to remove the London Plane ways. Such trees should be at least 2% inches caliper (measured six caliper at time of planting, in the planting area east of the parking lot. However, the London tree at the northeast comer inches above the ground) and should be of a species common to the planting area east of the parking lot. Plane tree shown at the northeast comer of the parking of the parking area. area. Such trees should be located at least every 25 feet on center. area has the potential to conflict with the pipe along the Revise the landscape plan to provide a row of shrubs along the northern perimeter of the parking area. Removing the London Plane tree at the northeast corner of the parking Revise the landscape plan to replace the Scarlett Oak 35 Landscaping of parking areas: a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, located 40 full length of the proposed retaining area, due to the size of the tree at maturity and potential trees with a medium-sized feet on center. Trees should be planted in the interior of parking areas at wall along the southern perimeter of conflicts with surrounding hardscapes, would be tree or more narrow, the rate of one tree for every 10 parking spaces provided and should be the site. appropriate. columnar species. evenly distributed throughout the interior of the parking area. b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should measure 2% inches Revise the landscape plan to The landscape plan has been revised to provide a row of caliper (measured six inches above the ground); should be evenly provide trees along the northern shrubs along the full length of the proposed retaining wall spaced; and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees perimeter of the site that does not along the southern perimeter of the site. should be planted in planters or medians sufficiently large to maintain conflict with existing off -site the health of the tree and shall be protected by curbing. landscaping. Four Scarlet Oak trees have been provided along the c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking northern perimeter of the site. Due the limited planting area's impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24 area and their spread (40'-50') once mature these trees inches in height. have the potential to conflict with the drive-thm travelway and the off -site landscaping. Revising the landscape plan 36 Landscaping of buildings and other structures: a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the front of long to replace the Scarlet Oak trees with a medium-sized tree buildings as necessary to soften the appearance of exterior walls. The or a more narrow, columnar species to avoid conflicts with spacing, size, and type of such trees or vegetation should be determined the drive-thm travelway and the off -site landscaping by the length, height, and blankness of such walls. would be appropriate. b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other structures; dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thru" windows; service areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height. 37 Plant species: a. Plant species required should be as approved by the Revise the landscape plan to The landscape plan has been revised to increase the None. Staff based upon but not limited to the Generic Landscape Plan increase plant diversity such that no diversity of the plantings so that no single species of tree Recommended Species List and Native Plants for Virginia Landscapes single species of tree or shrub or shrubs exceeds 25% of the total proposed for that plant (Appendix D). exceeds 25% of the total proposed type. for that plant type. 38 Plant health: The following note should be added to the landscape plan: None. The note is present on the landscape plan. None. "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant." Development paffert4 Site Development and layout 6 Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural landscape None. The site is accessed from Seminole Lane. The travelway None. and should contribute to the creation of an organized development plan. and parking area have an organized pattern. This may be accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the trees and rolling terrain typical of the area; planting new trees along The proposed commercial building is situated parallel to streets and pedestrian ways and choosing species that reflect native the EC and the front elevation is approximately 45' closer forest elements; insuring that any grading will blend into the to the Rt. 29 frontage than the existing building. An surrounding topography thereby creating a continuous landscape; outdoor seating area is proposed between the building and preserving, to the extent practical, existing significant river and stream the frontage that helps to add interest and engage the EC valleys which may be located on the site and integrating these features street. into the design of surrounding development; and limiting the building mass and height to a scale that does not overpower the natural settings A striped crosswalk and pedestrian way are proposed to of the site, or the Entrance Corridor. connect to the existing pedestrian way along Rt. 29. 39 The relationship of buildings and other structures to the Entrance Corridor street and to other development within the corridor should be The site has been previously developed. Existing as follows: landscaping is proposed to be removed to accommodate a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, and the building, drive-thru travelway/parking area, and pedestrian walks should guide the layout of the site. outdoor dining area. b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor street should be parallel to the street. Building groupings should be arranged to parallel Views around the site are not expected to be negatively the Entrance Corridor street. impacted. c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems. d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity within the Entrance Corridor. e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys, steep slopes, significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If the provisions of Section 32.5.2.n of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements required by that section should be located so as to maximize the use of existing features in screening such improvements from Entrance Corridor streets. f. The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views and vistas on and around the site. Site Gradin 40 Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site to Increase the depth of the planting No changes have been made to the depth of the planting Note on the plan the surrounding conditions by limiting the use of retaining walls and by bed along the retaining walls or bed along the retaining walls. The shrub species between specific color proposed for shaping the terrain through the use of smooth, rounded landforms that revise the shrub to one with an the retaining wall and the drive-thru travelway along the the retaining walls. A block blend with the existing terrain. Steep cut or fill sections are generally upright habit and mature size suited eastern perimeter of the site has been revised to Virginia in a muted, earth -tone color unacceptable. Proposed contours on the grading plan shall be rounded with to the available planting area. Sweetspire, a species better suited to the available planting would be appropriate. a ten -foot minimum radius where they meet the adjacent condition. Final Revise the landscape plan to area. grading should achieve a natural, rather than engineered, appearance. provide a row of shrubs along the Retaining walls 6 feet in height and taller, when necessary, shall be full length of the proposed retaining Along the southern perimeter of the site the landscape terraced and planted to blend with the landscape. wall along the southern perimeter of plan has been revised to continue the row of Winterberries the site. along the full length of the retaining wall. Revise the plan to indicate retaining The plan has been revised to indicate retaining wall wall material, color, manufacturer. material and manufacturer. The plan notes the color as A block in a muted, earth -tone color "natural" but does not specify a particular color. A would be appropriate. specification is needed to confirm appropriateness. 41 No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the drip line of Show areas designated for The areas designated for preservation and tree protection Show areas designated for any trees or other existing features designated for preservation in the final preservation and tree protection fencing have not been noted on the plans. preservation and tree Certificate of Appropriateness. Adequate tree protection fencing should be fencing coordinated throughout the protection fencing shown on, and coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and plans. coordinated throughout the erosion and sediment control plans. plans. 42 Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness should be clearly delineated and protected on the site prior to any grading activity on the site. This protection should remain in place until completion of the development of the site. 43 Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy equipment within this area. 20 Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be designed to fit into None. There are no above -ground stormwater features proposed. None. the natural topography to avoid the need for screening. When visible from the Entrance Corridor street, these features must be frilly integrated into the landscape. They should not have the appearance of engineered features. 44 Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new drainage patterns) should be incorporated into the finished site to the extent possible. Signs Sign applications are required for Signage is reviewed and approved by separate submission. Sign applications are all proposed signs. However, the following comment is provided. General required for all proposed sign locations are shown along the building elevations in signs. the architectural drawings. The locations shown appear to be appropriate for the EC but the height of the signs Ensure that the sign shown on the canopy face in the elevations is as tall as the application drawings show canopy. Signage in the EC should allow for clear space canopy sign heights that above, below, and to the sides to avoid overcrowding the allow for clear space above, sign area. The heights shown in the perspectives appear to below, and to the sides of show signage better suited to the height of the canopy the letters to avoid face. overcrowding the sign band. 10 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion: 1. Visibility of rooftop equipment; appropriate screening. 2. Landscaping along the western side of the property: quantity and spacing. 3. Landscaping along the northern side of the property: species. Staff recommends approval of the final site plan with the following revisions: 1. Add the standard window glass note to the drawings: "Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 40%. Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%." 2. Provide as part of the site plan detail drawings and color specifications for the clearance bar and order point canopy. 3. Show the location of rooftop and wall -mounted equipment on the architectural elevations. Show the location of ground -mounted equipment on the site plan, or indicate that no ground equipment is proposed. 4. Revise the dumpster enclosure detail to specify materials that are compatible with the building and appropriate for the EC. 5. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the architectural drawings: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated." 6. Revise the photometric plan to include footcandle values and cutsheet information for the bollard and building -mounted lighting. 7. Note the lumen levels for the bollard lighting on the plan. Fixtures that emit 3000 or more lumens must be full cutoff fixtures. 8. Provide details to clarify the installation of the strip light fixtures. 9. Revise the photometric plan using an LFF of 1.0 for all fixtures. 10. Revise the photometric plan to specify a color temperature between 2000k and 3000k for the site lighting. 11. Indicate the color of the proposed fixtures on the plans. 12. Include a note on the lighting plan indicating that the 20' maximum height of the pole -mounted fixtures includes any base. 13. Revise the photometric plan to add the standard lighting note. 14. Revise the landscape plan to remove the London Plane tree at the northwest corner of the parking area. 11 ATTACHMENTS • Attach. 1: ARB2021-42: Starbucks Final Site Plan • Attach. 2: ARB2021-42: Starbucks Architectural Drawings • Attach. 3: ARB2021-42: Starbucks Color Renderings TABLE A This report is based on the following submittal items: Sheet # Drawing Name Drawing Date/Revision Date Starbucks Final Site Plan 4/5/21 C0.0 Cover Sheet C1.0 Notes & Details 1 C L I Notes & Details 2 C 1.2 Notes & Details 3 C 1.3 Starbucks Details & Proffers C2.0 Existing Conditions C2.1 Demolition Plan C4.0 Layout & Utilities Plan C5.0 Grading and Drainage Plan C6.1 Inlet Drainage Area Plan CTO Utility Profiles L1.0 Landscape Plan L2.0 Landscape Details Lighting Plan Lighting Cut Sheets Starbucks Architectural Drawings 3/19/21 A001 Architectural Site Plan A100 Building Floor Plan A151 Building Roof Plan A201 Building Exterior Elevations A202 Building Exterior Elevations A301 Building Sections 12