Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201800087 Review Comments 2018-11-30 d ROUDABUSH, GALE &ASSOCIATES, INC. A A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION g P LAND SURVEYING Serving Virginia Since 1956 ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SURVEY DEPARTMENT 172 SOU Il-I I'ANIOPS DRIVE.STE:A 914 MONTICELLO ROAD JIML.1'AGGARI.PE. CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA 22911 CI IARLOTTESVILLE.VA 22902 WILLIAM J.LEDBE IER L.S. DON FRANCO.P.E. PHONE(434)979-8121 PHONE 1434)977-0205 BRIAN D.JAMISON.L.S. DAVID M.ROBINSON.P.E. FAX(434)979.1681 FAX(434)296-5220 DAVID A.JORDAN,L.S. AM\IY M.GEORGE.L.A. INFO,dROGDABUSII.C'OM KRISTOPIILR C WINTERS.L.S. November 30, 2018 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development ATTN: Tori Kanellopoulos 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 RE: Timberwood Square Dear Tori, We have reviewed your comments provided on November 7,2018, and have provided the following responses: Initial Site Plan Comments Required Prior to Initial Site Plan Approval: 1. [18-32.3.4] Fees. The required mailing notice fee must be paid prior to initial site plan approval. RESPONSE: The required mailing notice fee has been provided. Required Prior to Final Site Plan Approval: Planning Comments: 1. See attached direction from the Post Master regarding group mailboxes. Please coordinate location with the Post Master. RESPONSE: The location for the Post master for group mailboxes has been shown on sheet SP5 (Group Mail,Open Space B). 2. [18-32.5.2.a] Zoning. Include the minimum lot size for standard R-15 development, which is 2,904 square feet on SP2. RESPONSE: The minimum lot size has been shown on sheet SP2. wi ROUDABUSH, GALE &ASSOCIATES, INC. A iz A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION S P LAND SURVEYING Serving Virginia Since 1956 ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SURVEI DEPARTMENT 172 SOU 111 PAN I OPS DRIVE.STE A 914 MONTIC'ELLO ROAD CI IARLO"ITESVILLE,VA 2291 I CI IARLOTTESVILLE.VA 22902 JIM L.TAGGART,P.E. WILLIAM J.LEDBEI TER.L.S. DON FRANCO.P.E. PHONE(434)979-8121 PHONE(434)977-0205 BRIAN D.JAMISON,L.S. DAVID M.ROBINSON.P.E. FAX(434)979-1681 FAX(434)296-522(1 DAVID A.JORDAN,L.S. AMMY M.GEORGE.L.A. INFOWEROUDABUSILC'OVI KRISTOPI TER C WINTERS.L.S. 3. [18-32.5.2.a] Zoning. Maximum building height: List the maximum building height for the office use and for the residential uses (Townhomes) separately on SP2. See 18-4.19 and 18-4.20 for building height requirements. RESPONSE: The,maximum building height for each use has been shown on sheet SP2. 4. [18-32.5.2.a] Zoning. Add the Airport Impact Area overlay to Notes for Zoning on SP2. RESPONSE: The Airport Impact Area overlay has been listed for zoning on sheet SP2. 5. [Comment] Remove the reference to "approved residential density"; there is only "proposed residential density"at this stage. The proposed density is within the R-15 density requirements. -- RESPONSE: The reference to approved residential density has been changed to proposed residential density. 6. [18-32.5.2.b] Written schedules or data. Revise note to read"office use"instead of "commercial use", for Parking Tabulations and Square Footage, as the office use has specific parking requirements that are distinct from other commercial uses, on SP2. RESPONSE: The notes reading commercial use for parking have been updated to show office use. The designation of commercial space has been maintained throughout the rest of SP2 due to the fact that the club was originally a kidney dialysis center and the commercial use may change in the future. 7. [18-32.5.2.b] Written schedules or data. According to GIS,the proposed tabulations (acreage for each lot) are actually the existing tabulations (SP2). RESPONSE: The proposed tabulations have been updated to show it as existing. 8. [18-32.5.2.a] Setback lines and yards. Revise Setback Note on SP2 and remove the reference to Townhomes. Refer to 18-4.19 for non-infill setback requirements and use those requirements. RESPONSE: The setbacks have been updated as requested. 9. [18-32.5.2.n] Existing and proposed improvements. Include the proposed paving materials for the trail and for the parking areas. • RESPONSE: Paving details for the trail and parking areas have been provided on sheet.SP8. 1ki ROUDABUSH, GALE &ASSOCIATES, INC. A Hi A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION g p LAND SURVEYING Serving Virginia Since 1956 ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SURVEY DEPARTMENT 172 SO1!1II PAN'IOPS DRIVE.STE.A 914 MONTICELLO ROAD JIML.TAGGAR'T.RE. - CHARLOTTESVILLli,VA2291I C'I!ARLO]TES VILLE.VA22902 WILLIAMJ.LEDBETTER.L.S. DON FRANCO.P.E. PHONE(434)979-8121 PHONE(434)977-0205 BRIAN D.JAMISON,L.S. DAVID M.ROBINSON.P.E. FAX(434)979-1691 FAX(434)296-5220 DAVID A.JORDAN,L.S. AMMY M.GEORGE.L.A. INFO41:ROUDABIJSII.C'OM KRIS TOPI IER C WINTERS.L.S. 10. [18-32.5.2.d] In the development areas, the critical slopes ordinance has been revised to create an overlay map of'managed' and 'preserved' steep slopes. Please remove all reference to "critical slopes" (SP2). RESPONSE: All critical slopes are now identified as managed or preserved slopes. The reference to critical slopes waiver on SP2 recognizes that a critical slopes waiver was approved in a previous version of the Albemarle Code. This is for reference only. 11. [18-32.5.2.m] Ingress and egress. The location of existing and proposed ingress to and egress from the property, showing the distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street'intersection. RESPONSE: The location of ingress/egress and distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection are shown on SP3. 12. [18-32.5.2.1] Existing and proposed utilities. Label all utilities as either existing or proposed. Include the deed book and page number of all existing easements. Proposed easements that are not yet recorded must be recorded with an easement plat prior to final site plan approval. RESPONSE: All existing utilities with deed book and page number can be found on SP3. All proposed utilities can be found on the layout plan sheet SP5 and SP6. 13. [18-32.5.2.1 and 18-4.11.4] Existing and proposed utilities. Revise the easements that are conflicting with any structures. See Lot 10 as an example (appears easement conflicting with deck). RESPONSE: There are no easement conflicts with this submittal. Although difficult to see there is a 0.01' difference between the patio on lot 10 and the stormwater easement. I am uncertain that a concrete patio can have a conflict with an easement,whereas a deck certainly would. 14. [18-4.12.6] Minimum number of parking spaces. Include the number of bedrooms for the Townhomes in order to ensure that parking has been calculated correctly on SP2. RESPONSE: We have provided (2) spaces and one (1) for every (4) four units which is the maximum required for two(2)or more bedrooms. 15. [18-4.12.6] Minimum number of parking spaces. Add maximum number of employees for the office use to SP2. RESPONSE: The approved parking reduction request was for 65 spaces. 65 spaces have been provided. See SP2 for calculations. • vi ROUDABUSH, GALE &ASSOCIATES, INC. A A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION g p LAND SURVEYING Serving Virginia Since 1956 ENGINEERING LANDPLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SURVE\DEPARTMENT 172 SO(!I II PANTOPS DRIVE.STE A 914 MONTICELLO ROAD JIM L.TAGGART.P.E. CIIARLorrESVILLE,VA22911 CIIARLO'I TES VILLE.VA22902 WILLIAM.1.LEDBETER.L.S. DON FRANCO.P.E. PHONE(434)979-8121 PHONE(434)977-0205 BRIAN D.JAMISON.L.S. DAVID M.ROBINSON.P.E. FAX(434)979-1681 FAX(434)296-5220 DAVID A.JORDAN,L.S. AMMY M.GEORGE.L.A. INFOd••ROUDABUSII.COM KRISTOI'IIERC WINTERS.L.S. 16. [18-4.12.6] Minimum number of parking spaces. Include a copy of the previously approved parking waiver, such as a letter or an email. RESPONSE: Per conversation with Tori the approved parking waiver letter or email was not necessary. 17. [18-4.12.13] Dumpster pad placement. The location of the dumpster pad appears to be interfering with two parking spaces. Revise the placement of the dumpster pad. RESPONSE: The concrete dumpster pad in front of the dumpster is at grade with the rest of the parking lot. The concrete pad is not blocking any space. The dumpster pad is not in conflict with the parking spaces. , 18. [18-4.12.4(b)]ADA accessible spaces. Label the van-accessible ADA spaces as "van". RESPONSE: Van ADA parking spaces have been provided with this submittal. 19. [18-4.12.5] Location of parking areas. Parking is required to be on the same lot as the primary use, except as authorized by 18-4.12.8. The lot lines for all of the lots overlap with the parking spaces in such a way that the parking spaces are split by the lot lines. Some lots contain one full parking space and one or two parts of other parking spaces, however only some lots (1, 2, 6, 10, 11, 15, 19, 20, 28 and 32) contain at least two full parking spaces. A shared parking agreement will be required for the lots for the townhomes. RESPONSE: The private road ROW has been extended to the edge of the parking stalls. An access easement has been provided from the ROW to 1'behind the sidewalk. No shared parking agreement is necessary. 20. [18-4.12.16(c)] Parking space widths. A parking space between Lots 7 and 8 appears to be 8.5', and four parking spaces in front of Lot 10 appear to be 9.5' wide. Revise to meet the 9' width requirement. The two end parking spaces in the row of spaces in front of Lots 25-32 also do not appear to be sufficiently wide. They appear to be 7' and 8' wide, which is below the 9' width requirement. RESPONSE: The parking space between Lots 7 and 8 has been updated. The parking space in front of Lot 10 will remain the same. These are on a curve and the spaces can be a bit larger in these cases. The parking width satisfies the minimum required by Albemarle County Code. The parking spaces in front of Lot 25 and 32 include the 2' CG-6. The spaces are 9'wide here. ROUDABUSH, GALE &ASSOCIATES, INC. A A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION s p LAND SURVEYING Serving Virginia Since 1956 ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENGINEERING DEI'ARI'MENT SURVEY DEPAR 1RIENT 172 SOU III I'AN'IOPS DRIVE.SI'E A 914 MONfIC'ELLO ROAD JIM L.TAGGART RE. CIIARLOrrESVILLE,VA 22911 C'IIARLOI TES VILLE,V.A22902 WILLIAM J.LEDBET'1'ER.L.S. DON FRANCO.P.E. PlIONE(434)979-8121 I'I IONE(434)977-0205 BRIAN D.JAMISON.L.S. DAVID M.ROBINSON.RE FAX(434)979-1681 FAX(434)298-522(! DAVID A.JORDAN,L.S. AMMY M.GEORGE.L.A. INFO'i ROUDABI'SILCOM KRISTOPIiER C WINTERS.L.S. 21. [18-4.12] Parking. Include 'No Parking Signs' along Lois Lane. RESPONSE: A no parking sign has been provided on SP5. 22. [18-4.12.8(e)] Instrument assuring continuation of off-site parking. Stand-alone parking for the commercial area: If stand-alone parking or off-site shared parking is to be provided, the applicant shall submit with the application for a site plan, site plan waiver or, if a site plan is not required, with an application for a zoning compliance clearance, an instrument that restricts the use of that part of the land on which parking is provided to that use, and assures that a minimum number of parking spaces as required by this section shall be established and maintained for the life of the use. The instrument shall be in a form that is suitable for recording, shall be subject to review and approval as'to form and substance by the county attorney, and shall be recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county before the site plan or site plan waiver is approved. As the parking requirements for the use or structure change, subsequent instruments may be submitted,reviewed, approved and recorded that rescind or modify the prior instrument. a. This is a requirement prior to final site plan approval. RESPONSE: There is no shared parking for this project. 23. [18-4.12.11(b)] Identification of use served. For standalone parking,at least one (1) sign shall be posted in the parking area identifying the off-site use served by the parking area. RESPONSE: There are not off-site uses for this development. 24. [18-32.7.9.4] Contents of a landscape plan. Revise the small notes counting the number of trees on SP9 and SP10, as some are incorrect. RESPONSE: The number of plants on sheet SP11 has been update with this submittal. 25. [18-32.7.9.4] Contents of a landscape plan. IG(Illex Glabra) appears to be Inkberry, not Winterberry as indicated in the Commercial Landscaping Tabulations on SP 11. RESPONSE: The planting tabulation has been updated with this submittal. 26. [18-32.7.9.4(b)(1)]Areas and other features shown on landscape plan. Show the limits of clearing, location and type of protective fencing, grade changes requiring tree wells or walls, and trenching or tunneling proposed beyond limits of clearing for preserved existing trees. This could be shown on the demolition plan or the landscaping plan. 'RESPONSE: This information has been provided on the WPO plan. ROUDABUSH, GALE &ASSOCIATES, INC. A A•PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION g p LAND SURVEYING Serving Virginia.Since 1956 ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SURVEY DEPARTMENT 172 SOU fl I PAN TOPS DRIVE.STE A 914 MONTICELLO ROAD JIM L.TACIGART.I'E. CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA 22911 CIIARLO ITESVILLE.V12_2902 WILLIAM J.LEDBEITER.L.S. PHONE(434)979-8121 PI IONE(434)977-0205 DON FRANCO.P.E. BRIAN D JAMISON.L.S. DAVID M.ROBINSON.P.E. FAX(434)979-1681 FAX(434)296-5220 DAVID A.JORDAN,L.S. AMMY M.GEORGE,I..A. INFO;irROUDABUSI I.COM) KRIS roil IER C WINTERS.I.S. 27. [18-32.7.9.5(d)] Landscaping along streets. Street trees are required for private and public streets. 1 large street tree is required every 50' of frontage, or 1 medium shade tree every 40' of frontage. Sections of the private streets do not appear to meet this requirement. See Code for full requirements. RESPONSE: Landscaping along streets has been maximized. Some existing trees are being used for this requirement. Other areas have existing or proposed utilities that do not allow trees in these areas. • 28. [18-32.7.9.7(e)] Screening. Include the height of the proposed screening fences.Note that the minimum height is 6'. RESPONSE: A 6' screening fence detail has been provided on sheet SP11. 29..[18-32.7.9.7(a)(4)] Double frontage lots.Double frontage lots need to be sufficiently screened from the public ROW. Lot 11 does not appear to be sufficiently screened from Worth Crossing. RESPONSE: A screening fence has been provided where trees are not allowed in the easements. 30. [18-32.7.9.7(a)(2)] Parking areas. Parking areas need to be screened from adjacent residential districts. The parking for Lots 11-14 does not appear to be sufficiently screened from the adjacent property. Show if existing trees/landscaping will be preserved to provide screening. RESPONSE: A screening fence has been provided where trees are not allowed in the easements. 31. [18-32.7.9.8(b)] Tree canopy. In order to count toward the tree canopy requirement, plants/trees must exceed 5' in height at a maturity of 10 years after planting. Some of the landscaping shown on SP11 is 5' or less at maturity, and therefore does not count toward this requirement. The residential tree canopy calculations appear to now be below the requirement. Please revise to meet the requirement. RESPONSE: The planting data has been updated with this submittal. A tree that has a minimum caliper of 2 to 2.5"is considered to be approximately 5' in height. 32. [18-4.16.1(3)] Minimum area. Note that groundcover shall consist of-turf grass or contained mulch such as pine bark, shredded tires, or pea gravel for recreational areas. RESPONSE: A note has been added to SP7 stating that the tot lot shall have ground cover as required. ROUDABUSH, GALE&ASSOCIATES, INC. A A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION s p LAND SURVEYING Serving Virginia Since 1956 ENGLNEERING LAND PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SURVEY DEPARTMENT 172 SOU II I I'ANTOPS DRIVE.STE.A 914 MONTICELLO ROAD JIM L.TAGGART.RE. CH.ARLOTTESVILLE,VA2291I CIIARLOI'TESVILLE.VA22902 µ ILLIAM J.LEDBETTER.L.S. DON FRANCO.P.E. PHONE(434)979-8121 PHONE 14341977-0205 BRIAN D.JAMISON,L.S. DAVID M.ROBINSON.RE. FAX(4 34)979-1681 FAX(434)296-5220 DAVID A.JORDAN,L.S. AMMY M.GEORCIE.L.A. INFOui1RO(1DABL'SILCOM KRIS rOPIIER C WINTERS.L.S. 33. [18-4.16.1(3)] Minimum area. Indicate how the recreational area is being calculated. In the residential area,there appears to be 2,525 sq. ft. for the tot lot, 25,289 sq. ft. for one section of open space and 4,692 sq. ft. for the other section of open space. The recreational area is listed as 17,376 sq. ft. RESPONSE: The recreational area information has been updated with this submittal. • 34. [18-4.16.2.1] Recreational minimum facilities. Note that the swing is required to have four(4) seats. The image shown on SP 11 only has three seats. RESPONSE: The detail for the swing has been updated to show 4 swings. 35. [18-4.16.2.1] Recreational minimum facilities. The proposed tot lot must be fenced, as it is adjacent to a street and to private backyards. RESPONSE: The tot lot has been shown to be fenced in with this submittal. 36. [18-4.17] Outdoor lighting. Resubmit the lighting information so that it is legible. It is not possible to read the information on the types of lights provided on SP12 and SP13. RESPONSE: The outdoor lighting plan has been updated with this submittal. 37. [18-4.17.4] Standards. Any outdoor luminaire that emits 3,000 or more lumens must be a full cutoff luminaire. Therefore, both the Mediterranean light and the KVF2 light must be full cutoff, or a different type of luminaire must be chosen that is less than 3,000 lumens. The Mediterranean light is not full cutoff and does not comply. The KVF2 light has a light bulb that hangs down, and therefore may not be full cutoff RESPONSE: Full cutoff lights have been provided with this submittal. 38. [18-32.7.2.3] Sidewalks. Sidewalks or trails must be provided on both sides of Lois Lane. The trail on the East side may serve as pedestrian connectivity. A sidewalk is needed on the West side and must connect to the other sidewalks shown. RESPONSE: The sidewalk will not be provided on this side of Lois Lane. There is enough connectivity with the trail on the eastern side of Lois Lane. A sidewalk on the west side of Lois Lane will result in a 4'retaining wall that can be graded out as of now. This plan was previously approved with this layout and should be approved again. There are sidewalks connecting every portion of the project to all internal and external roads and trails. wi ROUDABUSH, GALE &ASSOCIATES, INC. A al A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION S p LAND SURVEYING Serving Virginia Since 1956 ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SURVEY DEPARTMENT 172 SOU TI I PAN'I'OPS DRIVE.STE.A 914 MONTICELLO ROAD JIM L.'rAGGARI'.P.E. CI IARLOTTESVILLE,VA22911 CIIAILLOI"TESVILLE.VA22902 WILLIAMJ.LEDBfiI-1'ER.L.S. DON FRANCO.P.E. PHONE(434)979-8121 PHONE 14341977-0205 BRIAN D.JAMISON.L.S. DAVID M.ROBINSON.RE FAX(434)979-1681' FAX(434)296-5220 DAVID A.JORDAN,L.S. AM MY M.GEORGE.L.A. INFO:ii:ROUDABUSI LCOM KRIS Rog IER C WINTERS-L.S. 39. [18-32.7.2.3] Sidewalks. Provide a sidewalk or other pedestrian access across the curb/planting strip (if this is ultimately kept) between Lots 1 and 15, so that pedestrians may have safe access to the other side of the development and the office uses. RESPONSE: There is existing sidewalk in this area. 40. [18-32.7.2.3] Sidewalks. Provide a sidewalk on the north side of the existing Private Road to connect with the existing sidewalk and the proposed residential area. RESPONSE: There are sidewalks connecting every portion of the project to all internal and external roads and trails. A sidewalk is being provided for access from Timberwood Boulevard past the office and commercial uses to Landon Lane. Sidewalk not provided. 41. [18-32.7.2.3] Sidewalks. Request for applicant to provide sidewalks along Timberwood Blvd. and Worth Crossing along the edge of the property. Provide ADA accessible ramps at the corner of Timberwood Blvd and Worth Crossing, and at the trailhead where it meets Worth Crossing. The sidewalks in the public ROW will need to be dedicated to the County and maintained by VDOT. Additional detail pending VDOT's comments. RESPONSE: Comment noted. VDOT can build the sidewalks in their ROW. 42. [Comment] Additional clarification is needed for the curb and planting strip that restricts vehicle access between Lots 1 and 15. It appears to still contain curb and gutter, which would no longer be needed.Additional details are needed to determine what the use and structure of this section is. Fire/Rescue has comments as well, as there are more than 30 lots with only one point of access, and this section may need to be changed. RESPONSE: The vehicle access has been shown as a paved surface with bollards to block access for residents but allow a second point of access for fire and rescue. 43. [Comment] Include one'sheet that shows an overall detailed layout of the proposed site design. All of the detailed pages are split into two pages. This is helpful for measuring and level of detail,however there should also be one sheet showing the entire site. RESPONSE: Sheet SP17 shows the entire project area along with the drainage areas for the storm inlets. IC\ ROUDABUSH, GALE &ASSOCIATES, INC. A A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION' s p LAND SURVEYING Serving Virginia Since 1956 ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SURVEY DEPARTMENT 172 SOU III PANTOPS DRIVE.STE.A 914 MONI'ICELLO ROAD JIM L.TAGGART.P.E. CIIARLOTTESVILLE,VA 22911 C'I(ARLO'I'TESVILLE.VA 22902 WILLIAM J.LEU[JE'I"1'ER.1_.S. DON FRANCO.P.E. PIIONE(434)979-8121 PRONE(434)977-0205 BRIAN I).JAMISON.L.S. DAVIT)M.ROBINSON.I'.E FAX(434)979-1681 FAX(434)296-5221) DAVID A.JORDAN,L.S. AMNIY M.GEORGE.L.A. INFO;fi ROUDABUSI LCOM KRISTOPI IER C' WINTERS.L.S. 44. [Future Application Comments] a. [Comment]: Private maintenance agreement will be required for the open space and common/recreational areas. Shared parking agreements will be required for the townhomes. An instrument to assure continuation of off-site parking will be required for the commercial area. A private maintenance agreement or dedication to public use will be needed for the trail. RESPONSE: A private maintenance agreement will be provided under separate cover. b. [Comment]: Note that Subdivision plat will be needed to create lots for the Townhomes. RESPONSE: Comment noted. c. [Comment]: The proposed private streets will need to meet the private streets standards in Chapter 14 (Subdivision Ordinance) during the subdivision phase of this development. RESPONSE: Comment noted. d. [Comment]: Easement plats will be required for all proposed easements prior to final site plan approval. Additional landscaping easements will be required for . any landscaping shown on residential lots. RESPONSE: Comment noted. e. [Comment]: Note that approved Road Plans, WPO and VSMP are required prior to final site plan approval. RESPONSE: Comment noted. Engineering Comments 1. Note: Combined(Engineering) Road Plan (SUB201500077) and Final Site Plan review comments (SDP201500023) were sent to Applicant on 6/18/16 (Timberwood Square). RESPONSE: Comment noted. 2. Final Site,Road, WPO Plans for this proposed development did not reach point of approval. SDP201500023 (FSP) expired due to inactivity. • I �i ROUDABUSH, GALE &ASSOCIATES, INC. A A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION g p LAND SURVEYING Serving V rginia Since 1956 ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SURVEY DEPARTMENT' 172 SOU I H PAN IOPS DRIVE.STE.A 914 MONI'ICELLO ROAD .11M L.MAGGARM P.E. CIRRIATTESVILLE,VA22911 C'IIARLO'ITESVILLE.VA22902 µILLIAMJ.LEDBEI`I'ER.L.S. DON FRANCO.P.E. PHONE(434)979-8121 PHONE(434)977-0205 BRIAN D.JAMISON,L.S. DAVID M.ROBINSON.P.E. FAX(434)979-1681 FAX(434)296-5220 DAVID A.JORDAN,L.S. AMP/M.GEORGE.L.A. INFO i1tROUDABI!SILCOM KRIS'1'OPHER(' WINTERS.L.S. a. Text of email sent to Applicant(8/31/2018 10:03 AM), reads, in part: "...this application was withdrawn in January due to inactivity in accordance with 32.4.3.5(b). In addition, your initial has expired since it was approved in 2011 and that is only valid for 5 years. So,you will need to submit an initial site plan and fee and start your application again." RESPONSE: Comment noted. b. Text, email,Engineering to Planning(6/18/2016 2:11 PM -also RMS docs, SDP201500023): "(SDP201500023)—Engineering has No Objection to FSP design. Engineering comments addressed with this or prior submittal. FSP Approval requires ROAD Plan Approval, and requires that roads (Lois Lane, Landon Lane)be built or bonded. ROAD Plan is not approved. FSP Approval requires that WPO be approved and bonded. Planning coordinator should confirm that SWM Maintenance Agreements have been signed,that project has received VPDES Permit coverage letter from DEQ. Please confirm WPO status with Max Greene, Engineering Div." RESPONSE: Comment noted. 3. Current SDP201800071, Initial Site Development Plan for Timberwood Square, may be identical with SDP201500023. Engineering requests cloud revisions for any design change made to SDP201500023 (since basis of SDP201800071) since Final Site Plan set dated 8 Jun 2016 (2nd Revision). If no changes,please respond 'SDP201500023 is identical with SDP201800071'. RESPONSE: Comment noted. Due to the nature of these comments there have been too many changes to just cloud them on the plans. Please review accordingly. 4. Ch. 14 Division 5, Procedures for the Approval of Private Streets, Sec. 14-233, When private streets in development areas may be authorized is relevant. It appears no element of initial site plan approval persists, and that request for approval of private streets in the development area is required. RESPONSE: Comment noted. 5. Street design standards: Engineering recently met with RGA(10/4/18)to discuss conceptual layout for 770 Rio Road East. VDOT and AASHTO standards apply to street design for six or more lots, and apply to Timberwood Square. If RGA can accept county position that in this particular instance, since a Road Plan CL radius of 110' (Lois Lane) was accepted in 2016, and Road Plan was virtually approved,provided RGA does not reference 110' CL radius in future applications unless supported by VDOT/AASHTO ROUDABUSH, GALE &ASSOCIATES, INC. A A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION s p LAND SURVEYING Serving Virginia Since 1956 ENGINEERING IANDPIANNING ENGINEERING DEIARI'MEENf SURVEY DEPARTMENT 172 SOD FH IANTOPS DRIVE.STE.A 914 MONTICELLO ROAD JIM L.TAGGART.P.E. CIIARLOTTESVILLE,V\2291I CI IARLO ITESVILLE.VA 22902 WILLIAM J.LEDBE'I"I'ER.L.S. DON FRANCO.P.E. PHONE(434)979-8121 PHONE(434)977-0205 BRIAN D.JAMISON.L.S. DAVID M.ROBINSON.P.E. FAX(434)979-1681 FAX(434)296-5220 DAVID A.JORDAN,L.S. AMMY M.GEORGE.L.A. INFOr4.ROUDABUSI I.COM KRISTOPI IER C WINTERS.L S. standards,then Engineering will not reverse and require what would amount to major redesign of Lois Lane. Options: Indicate understanding of County willingness to approve a 110' CL radius for Lois Lane; identify VDOT/AASHTO reference to 110' CL radius (Engineering is unaware of a CL radius standard this low); redesign Lois Lane to meet VDOT/AASHTO CL radii standards. Engineering welcomes RGA acceptance that if 110' CL radius is less than published applicable VDOT/AASHTO standards, Engineering does not in the future intend to accept 110' (or any measure of) radius that does not meet VDOT/AASHTO minimum design parameters. RESPONSE: The 110' radius is allowed in granfathered developments with an ADT less than 400. 6. Submit Road Plan that addresses remaining Road Plan review comments, at earliest convenience. Engineering requests cloud revisions for any design change made to SUB201500077 Road Plan set received 7 Jun 2016 (2nd Revision). If no changes,please state 'Road Plan submittal identical with most recent Road Plan for Timberwood Square, SUB201500077.' Again,please show any changes as cloud revisions. RESPONSE: Comment noted. Due to the nature of these comments there have been too many changes to just cloud them on the plans. Please review accordingly. 7. Carefully review Engineering Division Road and Site Plan comments dated 18-Jun 2016. (Also Attached. Also in CV.) RESPONSE: Comments have been reviewed and the plan has been updated accordingly. A) 2.5' R label should be located at curb radius. RESPONSE: The curb radius has been moved and updated as requested. B) RP13, Lighting Plan Cut Sheets, has been removed. As follow-up: please remove RP12, Lighting Plan. RESPONSE: The lighting plan has been removed from this submittal. C) As a follow-up: please compare and reconcile—Typical Section for Lois Lane Street sta 12+15 to 14+64(RP16),with plan view(24', 20'). Also,travel way width decreases from 24' to 20' near Landon Lane. Typical section does not indicate that the travel way width narrows, Compare RP5, RP16. RESPONSE: Typical sections has been updated and a transition note has been added to RP13. - mkt ROUDABUSH, GALE &ASSOCIATES, INC. A A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION g p LAND SURVEYING Serving Virginia Since 1956 ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT St IRVEY DEPARTMENT 172 SOU I PANTOPS DRIVE.S'I'FLA 914 MONIIC'ELLO ROAD JIM L.TAGGART.P.G. CHARLDTTESVILLE,VA 22911 CIIARLOTTESVILLE.VA 22902 WILLIAM J.LEDBki'P'1'GR.L.S. DON FRANCO.P.E. PHONE(434)979-8121 I'I IONE(434)977-0205 BRIAN D.JAMISON.L.S. DAVID M.ROBINSON.P.G FAX(434)979-1681 FAX(434)296-5220 DAVID A.JORDAN,L.S. AMMY NI.GEORGE.L.A. INFOaI'ROUDABUSILCOM KRISI'OPHLR C WINTERS.L.S. 8. Final Site Plan Approval requires Planning Division to authorize private streets in the development area, if private streets are proposed. RESPONSE: Private roads are being proposed. Comment noted. 9. Final Site Plan Approval requires Road Plan meet VDOT-AASHTO standards, with exception outlined in item 6. above. RESPONSE: See response 5. 10. Final Site Plan Approval requires roads be built or bonded. RESPONSE: Comment noted. 11. Final,Site Plan Approval requires WPO Approval. Last action on WPO201500032: review comments sent to Applicant, 6/27/16. If Applicant re-submits a WPO plan based on WPO201500032, Engineering requests cloud revisions of any change to plans since last submittal of WP020500032. RESPONSE: Comment noted. Due to the nature of these comments there have been too many changes to just cloud them on the plans. Please review accordingly. 12. This Initial Site Plan appears to require an Initial and/or Final Plat. RESPONSE: A final plat will be provided under separate cover. Inspections Comments: 1. Retaining walls greater than 3 feet in height require a separate building permit. Walls exceeding 4 feet in height require a stamped engineered design also. RESPONSE: Retaining walls are called out to be designed by others. 2. Parking spaces and access isles shall not have a surface slope greater than 1:48. Access isles shall be at the same level as the parking space they serve. - RESPONSE: ADA access isles and ADA parking shall be 2.08% not all parking spaces. Fire/Rescue Comments: • ROUDABUSH, GALE &ASSOCIATES, INC. A A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION g p LAND SURVEYING Serving Virginia Since 1956 ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SURVEY DEPARTMENT 172 SOU III I'ANI'OPS DRIVE.STE.A 914 MONTICELLO ROAD JIM L.FAcGART.P.E. CI IARLOTTESVILLE,VA 2291I CI IARLOTTESVILLE.VA 22902 WILLIAM.I.LEDBETTER.L.S. DON FRANCO.P.L. PHONE(434)979-8121 PHONE(434)977-0205 BRIAN D.JAMISON.L.S. DAVID M.ROBINSON.RE. FAX(434)979-1681 FAX(434)296-5220 DAVID A.JORDAN,L.S. AMMY NI.GEORGE.L.A. INFO:4.ROUDABUSILCOM KRISTOPIIER C WINTERS.L.S. 1. A knox box will be required on the'new office building. Please add a note indicating such and that location can be coordinated with the fire marshal's office. RESPONSE: A note has been added to SP-7 showing that the new office building will have a knox box. 2. If any of these buildings will be sprinklered the FDC must be shown on the site plan and located within 100' of a fire hydrant. RESPONSE: The office building will be sprinklered and an FDC connection has been provided on SP7. • 3. If the buildings are to be 30' or higher the travel way must be increased to 26' of clear travel width. RESPONSE: Per phone conversations with Shawn Maddox this requirement has been rescinded. 4. Due to the number of one or two-family dwelling units exceeding 30 there must be a second entrance/exit provided. RESPONSE: A second entrance has been provided with this submitted. ACSA 1. Submit 3 copies to ACSA for review ATTN: Jeremy Lynn. RESPONSE: 3 copies of the Site Plan have been provided to ACSA concurrently with this submittal. VDOT - - 1. Note that an acceptable Maintenance of Traffic Plan must be provided on the Final Site Plan. RESPONSE: A MOT has ben provided on sheet SP20. We thank you for taking the time to review these plans and trust the above adequately addresses your comments. However, please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information. Best Regards Dustin Greene,EIT