HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201900015 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2021-06-15Short Review Comments Report for:
SDP201900015 BROOKHILL - BLOCK 813 - FINAL
SubApplication Type: IFinal Site Development Plan
Date Completed:
05/16/2019
Reviewer:
Alexander Morrison Division: ACSA
Review Status:
Administrative Approval
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
09/24/2019
Reviewer:
Alexander Morrison Division: ACSA
Review Status:
Approved
Reviews Comments:
See letter dated 9-24-2019 uploaded to Laserfiche for ACSA approval.
Date Completed
04/25/2019
Reviewer:
Cameron Langille Division: CDD Planning
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
See comment letter dated 4-25-2019 uploaded to Laserfiche for Planning comments.
Date Completed:
04/18/2019
Reviewer:
Emily Cox Division: CDD Engineering
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
04/09/2019
Reviewer:
Heather McMahon Division: CDD ARB
Review Status:
See Recommendations
Reviews Comments:
A Certificate of Approrpriateness if required prior to Final Site Plan approval. The applicant must
submit an ARB application and associated fee for Final Site Plan review.
As a courtesy, I have provided the comments provided of the Initial Site Plan Review below:
This item was placed on the CONSENT AGENDA of the 8-20-18 ARB meeting.
Motion to Approve Consent Agenda:
Motion: Mr. Binsted moved to approve the consent agenda and forward the recommendations
outlined in the staff reports for the Initial Site Plans to the Agent for the Site Review Committee, as
ARB-2018-102: Brookhill Block 8B — Initial Site Development Plan (TM/Parcel
)0001800)
Proposal: To develop Block 8B with 55 lots for multi -family attached dwellings (110 units grouped
into 11 buildings) and associated improvements on a 7.18-acre, L-shaped site.
Location: East side of Seminole Trail (Rt. 29 N) and north side of Palo Grounds Road (Rt. 643).
Forest Lakes Community is to the north and Montgomery Ridge is to the east.
Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18-30.6.4c(2), (3) and (5)
recommended conditions of initial plan approval:
None. Note that a Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval.
Page: 1 of 7 County of Albemarle Printed On: June 15, 2021
Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines: None.
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit: None.
Regarding the final site plan submittal:
Architecture and landscaping will be reviewed with a future submittal. A Certificate of
oropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval.
Provide site sections of Block 8B from the EC to determine visibility of the proposed buildings
t site structures.
Submit material and color samples, dimensioned elevations of the fagades, and floor plans of
attached multi -family buildings on lots 1-15 and 38-55 for review.
Provide the standard window glass note on the architectural elevations submitted for review:
idow glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet the following criteria: Visible light transmittance
T) shall not drop below 40%. Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%.
Provide a roof plan and architectural elevations that show the placement and proposed
ghts of mechanical units, if roof -mounted mechanical equipment is proposed. Show how all
bility of mechanical equipment from the EC will be eliminated.
If above -ground utilities are proposed, provide these and their easements on revised site
7. Include the mechanical equipment note on the revised site plans and architectural drawings:
Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated.
B. Provide in the site plan sufficient details to show that all proposed light fixtures meet the
requirements of the lighting ordinance.
9. Provide a landscape plan for review at a scale of 1" = 30'. Include utilities and their
easements on the plan, as well as a plant schedule.
10. Provide street trees on the east and south sides of Road ENVesley Circle.
11. Provide shade trees on the eastern edge of the site around the four parking spaces.
12. Provide the standard plant health note on all landscape plans submitted for review: All site
plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the
topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the
overall health of the plant.
04/05/2019
Michael Dellinger Division: CDD Inspections
See Recommendations
noted on previous reviews. Other than this, no objection.
J the following note to the general notes page:
taining walls greater than 3 feet in height require a separate building permit. Walls exceeding 4
t in height require an stamped engineered design also.
J the following note to the general notes page:
L water lines, sewer lines, and fire lines from the main to the structure MUST have a visual
pection performed by the buildng department.
to to developer:
e to required distances from lot lines and structures as required by the NFPA, undergound
pane tanks may be prohibited. Plan accordingly.
03/21 /2019
Shawn Maddox Division: Fire Rescue
Requested Changes
Thank you for addressing previous comments.
Based on the building heights shown on the first page of the submitted plans the travel ways on one
side of each building must be 26' of clear, unobstructed travel way. If the building heights will not
exceed 30' then this comment no longer pertains.
04/17/2019
Page: 2 of 7 County of Albemarle Printed On: June 15, 2021
Reviewer: Richard Nelson Division: ACSA
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
I do not have the SDP number for the final site plan but I wanted to let you know that it is currently
under construction plan review by the ACSA.
Date Completed: 04/19/2019
Reviewer: Adam Moore Division: VDOT
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed: 04/01 /2019
Reviewer: Andrew Slack Division: CDD E911
Review Status: No Objection
Reviews Comments:
No Objection.
Date Completed:
Reviewer: Victoria Fort Division: RWSA
Review Status: Pending
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed: 09/05/2019
Reviewer: Cameron Lanaille Division: CDD Planning
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
See comment letter dated 9-5-2019 uploaded to Laserfiche for Planning Division 2nd submittal
wmments.
Date Completed: 08/21/2019
Reviewer: Emily Cox Division: CDD Engineering
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed: 07/29/2019
Reviewer: Heather McMahon Division: CDD ARB
Review Status: See Recommendations
Reviews Comments:
A Certificate of Appropriateness if required prior to Final Site Plan approval. The applicant must
submit an ARB application and associated fee for Final Site Plan review.
As a courtesy, I have provided the comments provided of the Initial Site Plan Review below:
This item was placed on the CONSENT AGENDA of the 8-20-18 ARB meeting.
Motion to Approve Consent Agenda:
Motion: Mr. Binsted moved to approve the consent agenda and forward the recommendations
outlined in the staff reports for the Initial Site Plans to the Agent for the Site Review Committee, as
ARB-2018-102: Brookhill Block 8B — Initial Site Development Plan (TM/Parcel
iosal: To develop Block 8B with 55 lots for multi -family attached dwellings (110 units grouped
11 buildings) and associated improvements on a 7.18-acre, L-shaped site.
in: East side of Seminole Trail (Rt. 29 N) and north side of Polo Grounds Road (Rt. 643).
Lakes Community is to the north and Montgomery Ridge is to the east.
10 Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18-30.6.4c(2), (3) and (5)
Page: 3 of 7 County of Albemarle Printed On: June 15, 2021
recommended conditions of initial plan approval:
None. Note that a Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval.
Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines: None.
Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit: None.
Regarding the final site plan submittal:
Architecture and landscaping will be reviewed with a future submittal. A Certificate of
oropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval.
Provide site sections of Block 8B from the EC to determine visibility of the proposed buildings
t site structures.
Submit material and color samples, dimensioned elevations of the fagades, and floor plans of
attached multi -family buildings on lots 1-15 and 38-55 for review.
Provide the standard window glass note on the architectural elevations submitted for review:
idow glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet the following criteria: Visible light transmittance
T) shall not drop below 40%. Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%.
Provide a roof plan and architectural elevations that show the placement and proposed
ghts of mechanical units, if roof -mounted mechanical equipment is proposed. Show how all
bility of mechanical equipment from the EC will be eliminated.
If above -ground utilities are proposed, provide these and their easements on revised site
7. Include the mechanical equipment note on the revised site plans and architectural drawings:
Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated.
B. Provide in the site plan sufficient details to show that all proposed light fixtures meet the
requirements of the lighting ordinance.
9. Provide a landscape plan for review at a scale of 1" = 30'. Include utilities and their
easements on the plan, as well as a plant schedule.
10. Provide street trees on the east and south sides of Road E/Wesley Circle.
11. Provide shade trees on the eastern edge of the site around the four parking spaces.
12. Provide the standard plant health note on all landscape plans submitted for review: All site
plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the
topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the
overall health of the plant.
Date Completed:
--------------------------------------
07/31/2019
Reviewer:
Michael Dellinger Division: CDD Inspections
Review Status:
No Objection
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
08/13/2019
Reviewer:
Shawn Maddox Division: Fire Rescue
Review Status:
Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
There appear to be fire lines extending to the structures. If the buildings are going to be sprinklered
then FDC's must be shown on the site plan and must have a hydrant within 100' of each FDC.
If sprinklered the buildings must also have a Knox Box - add a note that indicates the requirement
and that the location can be coordinated with the fire marshal's office.
Date Completed:
08/14/2019
Reviewer:
Richard Nelson Division: ACSA
Review Status:
See Recommendations
Reviews Comments:
SDP201900015 Brookhill Block 8B Final Site Plan is currently under review.
Thanks,
Richard Nelson
Page: 4 of 7
County of Albemarle Printed On: June 15, 2021
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
08/16/2019
Adam Moore Division: VDOT
Requested Changes
01 /29/2020
Cameron Lanaille Division: CDD Planning
Requested Changes
See comment letter dated 01-29-2020 uploaded to Laserfiche for Planning Division third review
01 /22/2020
Emily Cox Division: CDD Engineering
Requested Changes
01/21/2020
Shawn Maddox Division: Fire Rescue
No Objection
Willis Bedsaul Division: VDOT
Pending
Richard Nelson Division: ACSA
Pending
01/16/2020
Margaret Maliszewski Division: CDD ARB
See Recommendations
tificate of Appropriateness if required prior to Final Site Plan approval. ARB202000012 has
submitted and is under review.
As a courtesy, ARB comments made during Initial Site Plan Review are provided below for reference:
This item was placed on the CONSENTAGENDAof the 8-20-18ARB meeting.
Motion to Approve Consent Agenda:
Motion: Mr. Binsted moved to approve the consent agenda and forward the recommendations
outlined in the staff reports for the Initial Site Plans to the Agent for the Site Review Committee, as
ARB-2018-102: Brookhill Block 8B — Initial Site Development Plan (TM/Parcel
Proposal: To develop Block 8B with 55 lots for multi -family attached dwellings (110 units grouped
into 11 buildings) and associated improvements on a 7.18-acre, L-shaped site.
Location: East side of Seminole Trail (Rt. 29 N) and north side of Polo Grounds Road (Rt. 643).
Forest Lakes Community is to the north and Montgomery Ridge is to the east.
Page: 5 of 7
Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18-30.6.4c(2), (3) and (5)
County of Albemarle Printed On: June 15, 2021
recommended conditions of initial plan approval:
None. Note that a Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval.
Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines: None.
Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit: None.
Regarding the final site plan submittal:
Architecture and landscaping will be reviewed with a future submittal. A Certificate of
Dropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval.
Provide site sections of Block 8B from the EC to determine visibility of the proposed buildings
t site structures.
Submit material and color samples, dimensioned elevations of the fagades, and floor plans of
attached multi -family buildings on lots 1-15 and 38-55 for review.
Provide the standard window glass note on the architectural elevations submitted for review:
idow glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet the following criteria: Visible light transmittance
T) shall not drop below 40%. Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%.
Provide a roof plan and architectural elevations that show the placement and proposed
ghts of mechanical units, if roof -mounted mechanical equipment is proposed. Show how all
bility of mechanical equipment from the EC will be eliminated.
If above -ground utilities are proposed, provide these and their easements on revised site
7. Include the mechanical equipment note on the revised site plans and architectural drawings:
Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated.
B. Provide in the site plan sufficient details to show that all proposed light fixtures meet the
requirements of the lighting ordinance.
9. Provide a landscape plan for review at a scale of 1" = 30'. Include utilities and their
easements on the plan, as well as a plant schedule.
10. Provide street trees on the east and south sides of Road E/Wesley Circle.
11. Provide shade trees on the eastern edge of the site around the four parking spaces.
12. Provide the standard plant health note on all landscape plans submitted for review: All site
plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the
topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the
overall health of the plant.
Date Completed: 04/14/2021
Reviewer: Cameron Langille Division: CDD Planning
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: I See comment letter dated 04/14/2021 uploaded to Laselfiche for Planning Division 4th review
Date Completed: 04/09/2021
Reviewer: Emily Cox Division: CDD Engineering
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
04/13/2021
Margaret Maliszewski Division: CDD ARB
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: I Provide revised architectural elevations for Buildings 1 and 3 showing the updated siding colors.
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
..... _....._............................................... _.
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Page: 6 of 7
Richard Nelson
Pending
03/30/2021
Adam Moore
Division: ACSA
Division: VDOT
County of Albemarle
Printed On: June 15, 2021
Review Status: Requested Changes
Reviews Comments: I See comment letter dated 04/14/2021 uploaded to Laserfiche for VDOT 4th review comments.
Date Completed: 04/15/2021
Reviewer: Margaret Maliszewski Division: CDD ARB
Review Status: Approved
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed: 06/10/2021
Reviewer: Cameron Langille Division: CDD Planning
Review Status: See Recommendations
Reviews Comments: I See comment letter dated 06/10/2021 uploaded to Laserfiche.
Date Completed: 05/18/2021
Reviewer: Emily Cox Division: CDD Engineering
Review Status: No Objection
Reviews Comments:
Date Completed:
Reviewer:
Review Status:
Reviews Comments:
05/17/2021
Richard Nelson Division: ACSA
Administrative Approval
recommend this site plan for approval.
Richard Nelson
Civil Engineer
Albemarle County Service Authority
168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22911
(434) 977-4511
Date Completed: 05/19/2021
Reviewer: Adam Moore Division: VDOT
Review Status: No Objection
Reviews Comments: I See comment letter dated 5/19/2021 uploaded to Laserfiche for VDOT no objection.
Date Completed: 06/15/2021
Reviewer: Cameron Langille Division: CDD Planning
Review Status: Approved
Reviews Comments:
Page: 7 of 7 County of Albemarle Printed On: June 15, 2021