Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SDP202000061 Correspondence 2021-06-11 (2)
Patricia "Paty" Saternye From: Ryan Cheney <rcheney@line-grade.com> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 11:26 AM To: Andrew baldwin Cc: Cameron Langille; Patricia "Paty" Saternye; Charles Rapp; Daniel Hyer; Justin Ritter Subject: Re: Sheetz Final Site Plan Submission CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. It's on the way. Thanks everyone, RYAN CHENEY, PE 434.262.0169 rchenevftline-arade.Com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-arade.00m On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:16 AM Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com> wrote: Great, thanks Cameron. Ryan can you get the FSP in? Thanks On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:10 AM Cameron Langille <blaneille@albemarle.ore> wrote: Hi Andrew, Go ahead and submit now so that we can review the revised plans and verify that all of the other substantive comments have been addressed. If all other comments have been addressed, then we will just send you a disclaimer comment that prior to submitting the final sets for County signature/approval, the new TMP number will need to be added to the drawings. As you noted, it can take several weeks for new TMPs to be generated, and CDD doesn't have any ability to get those created quicker than the timeline specified by the assessor's office. I hope this information is helpful, but please do not hesitate to ask follow-up questions should you have any. Thanks, Cameron Langille (pronounced "LAN-JILL") Principal Planner Albemarle County blangille@albemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3432 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com> Sent: Friday, June 11, 20219:13 AM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> Cc: Ryan Cheney <rcheney@line-grade.com>; Cameron Langille <blangille@albemarle.org>; Charles Rapp <rapplanddesign@gmail.com>; Daniel Hyer <dhyer@line-grade.com>; Justin Ritter <jr@ritterlawpllc.com> Subject: Re: Sheetz Final Site Plan Submission CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Great, so I am hearing that Deed book and page number receipt for recording and "parcel V (for the time being until tmp is assigned by county) coupled with notes on the plan to indicate this can allow us to submit the FSP for approval? Please anyone or everyone confirm so we can get this in today? Best Andrew On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:48 AM Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org> wrote: Andrew and Ryan, I will await to hear from Charles whether Cameron will be handling the last stages of the site plan review as well. In reference to Ryan's email below, that was a mistake on my part and I apologize. (unless Cameron tells you otherwise) Please ensure the recordation deed book and page number are added to the labels for the items created and vacated in the site plan. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle Coun psaternyeC@al bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com> Sent: Friday, June 11, 20217:09 AM To: Ryan Cheney <rchenev@line-grade.com> Cc: Cameron Langille <blangille@albemarle.org>; Charles Rapp <rapplanddesign@gmail.com>; Daniel Hyer <dhyer@line-grade.com>; Justin Ritter <jr@ritterlawpllc.com>; Patricia "Paty" Saternye <paaternye@albemarle.org> Subject: Re: Sheetz Final Site Plan Submission CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. I was under the impression cameron was the point on sheetz now? Charles. Can you advise. Cameron can you please let us know if in fad all that needs to be turned in is the recording receipt. Thanks. This is extremely time sensitive. On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 4:48 PM Ryan Cheney <rcheney@line-grade.com> wrote: Paty, I am referring to our email correspondence on March 30/April 1st (attached for reference). My question was: should we change the parcel labels and information on the cover to reflect the newly created parcel. In your answering email you state "Any changes that have legally taken place (been recorded) in ownership, parcel lines, Tax Map Parcel numbers, etc. must be changed before the site plan can be approved." (emphasis mine). Please let me know if I am misunderstanding what is legally required to be shown on the site plan with regard to parcel numbers. Thanks, RYAN CHENEY, PE 434.262.0169 rchenevOline-orade.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-omtle.com On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 3:41 PM Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> wrote: Ryan, Good afternoon. I apologize if there is some miscommunication in that specific regard. I think you are referring to the fact that the easement plat, which includes vacation of some parcel boundary lines, needed to be recorded prior to site plan approval. The recordation receipt needs to be forwarded to me so that I know the land in question is one parcel prior to the site plan approval. However, if I'm thinking of a different comment could you please state the comment number and I will check the comment to check its wording. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle County psaternye@al bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road. Suite 228. Charlottesville. VA 22902 From: Ryan Cheney <rcheney@line-grade.com> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 3:19 PM To: Cameron Langille <blangille@albemarle.org> Cc: Daniel Hyer <dhver@line-grade.com>; Justin Ritter <jr@ritterlawpllc.com>; Andrew Baldwin <andrew@corecville.com>; Charles Rapp <rapplanddesign@gmail.com>; Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternve@a I bema rle.org> Subject: Sheetz Final Site Plan Submission CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Cameron, We are looking to resubmit the FSP for the Sheetz project, however one small thing is holding us up. As you know, the boundary line adjustment and easement plat was approved and recorded. Paty has expressed to us that the FSP must reflect the new parcel number, however our team was informed by the Assessor's office this morning that it could take anywhere from 1-6 weeks for a new TMP to appear in the County's system. My question is: should we submit now to clear all other remaining comments and update the TMP prior to signatures, or would you advise us to wait until we have the new TMP? Is there any way we can obtain the new TMP quicker than the Assessor's office said? Thank you for your time, RYAN CHENEY, PE 434.262.0169 rehenevOline-arade.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-orade.com Andrew Baldwin Principal: Core Real Estate,LLC 600 E Water St. Suite H Charlottesville, VA 22902 434 466 6S66 0 Patricia "Paty" Saternye From: Ryan Cheney <rcheney@line-grade.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 10:13 AM To: David lames Cc: Daniel Hyer; Andrew baldwin; Frank Pohl; Patricia "Paty" Saternye Subject: Re: Executed Deeds for Sheetz Plats CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. David, Got a question about the bond request form. The owner and Sheetz have agreed that Sheetz will take over site work and posting bonds, however the bond request form calls for owner signature. I imagine the owner would still sign for the bond request form, but the actual bond posting can be done by Sheetz? Just trying to figure out who needs to sign what. Please advise. Thanks, RYAN CHENEY, PE 434.262.0169 rchenevAline-arade.Com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-arade.00m On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 1:26 PM David James <dlames2@albemarle.org> wrote: Ryan, I gave an older link, here's the form. https://www.a I bema rie.org/home/showpu bl isheddocu ment/990/637213509616130000 I I think it's ok to use existing or what's shown on the WPO plan. Thanks, David From: Ryan Cheney <rcheney@line-grade.com> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2021 11:45 AM To: David James <d0ames2@albemarle.org> Cc: Daniel Hyer <dhyer@line-grade.com>; Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com>; Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org>; Frank Pohl <fpohl@albemarle.org> Subject: Re: Executed Deeds for Sheetz Plats CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. David, Quick question: on the bond request form we must list parcel numbers. Can we use the existing parcel numbers on the form, or do we need to wait until the plat is recorded and the new parcel number is generated for the combined parcel? RYAN CHENEY, PE 434.262.0169 rchenevo line-n rade. com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-arade.com On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 9:31 AM David James <diames2@a1bemar1e.org> wrote: Daniel, Good morning, I'm wrapping up the WPO review today. One thing you or Andrew can do is start the process to bond the project by submitting bond request form & fee. The form is here ihttp://www.albemarle.org/upload/images/forms center/departments/Community Development/forms/bonds/Bon d Request to Establish a Bond.pdf Thanks, David James CEI I County of Albemarle 434-296-5832:3273 From: Daniel Hyer <dhyer@line-grade.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 20214:09 PM To: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com> Cc: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org>; David James <diames2@albemarle.org>; Ryan Cheney <rcheney@ I i ne-grade.com> Subject: Re: Executed Deeds for Sheetz Plats CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. David: If I recall you mentioned you had everything you needed to complete your review. Please let me know if you find anything that would require us to get something to you. We look forward to getting this wrapped up. thanks! DANIEL HYER, PE 434.962.2430 dhver(Mline-orade.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-arade.com On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 3:31 PM Andrew baldwin <and rew@corecvi I le.com> wrote: Paty, Please see the attached executed Deeds. Please let us know when we can expect the plat signed. David, what else do we need to provide to you for the WPO. We are anxious to break ground and get started. Our 150 day time period for LL deliverables to sheetz has already started and we really need to get going. Best Andrew Patricia "Paty" Saternye From: Patricia "Paty" Saternye Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 12:20 PM To: Justin Ritter Cc: Will White; Daniel Hyer; Alex Morrison; Andrew baldwin; David James Subject: RE: SUB2021-18 Airport Roads Sheetz RE: Follow Up Deeds As previously stated, the County cannot approve a plat that vacates something without the owner agreeing to it. Are those easement conflicting with something and therefore need to be removed now? If not, then maybe in order to get the plat approved you would have to remove the vacation of those easement from the plat. I can review this when I review the plat and deeds provided. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle County psaternye0al bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Justin Ritter <jr@ritterlawpllc.com> Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 11:50 AM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org> Cc: Will White <wwhite@roudabush.com>; Daniel Hyer <dhyer@line-grade.com>; Alex Morrison <amorrison@serviceauthority.org>; Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com>; David James <dj ames2 @a I bema rle.org> Subject: RE: SUB2021-18 Airport Roads Sheetz RE: Follow Up Deeds CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Paty —Thanks for this. Re: #4, we have to work with both CenturyLink (successor to Sprint/Centel) and Dominion to get the deeds of vacation prepared and ultimately approved by them. We are currently in process of doing this, but we cannot control their timing turnaround. Further, Dominion will not grant the vacation until it knows where its replacement easement locations will be, which won't practically be done until the site work is underway. In sum, we don't want these private deeds of vacation to get in the way of receiving whatever governmental approvals are necessary to begin the site work on the property. Can you please confirm that these will not be needed to receive such approvals? Let us know and thanks. Justin From: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 2:14 PM To: Justin Ritter <jr@ritterlawpllc.com> Cc: Will White <wwhite@roudabush.com>; Daniel Hyer <dhver@line-grade.com>; Alex Morrison <amorrison@serviceauthoritv.org>; Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com>; David James <d0ames2@albemarle.org> Subject: SUB2021-18 Airport Roads Sheetz RE: Follow Up Deeds Justin, Good afternoon. First, for all WPO related items you should be communicating with and submitting to the Engineering Reviewer assigned to that WPO, David James who I have copied on this email. Please email him directly to ask about and submit items that are WPO or SWM deed of easement related. Engineering is lead on both of those items. Second, once I have reviewed the items that you submitted in the last few days for SUB2021-18, and compared them to the comments that were provided to you, I will let you know if there is anything still outstanding. Until what you have submitted is reviewed I will not be able to answer question #2. If you have not done so already please refer to the comments provided to you on 4/13 (attached) and ensure all documents specified in them have been submitted. Have you already submitted a document to me that addressed comment #4 in the attached comments? If not, that is at least part of the answer to your question. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle County psaternye@al bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Justin Ritter <jr@ritterlawpllc.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 1:50 PM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <paaternye@albemarle.org>; Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com> Cc: Will White <wwhite@roudabush.com>; Daniel Hyer <dhver@line-grade.com>; Alex Morrison <amorrison@serviceauthority.org> Subject: RE: Follow Up Deeds CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Adding Alexander Morrison with ACSA to the chain. Attached find the necessary SWM and ACSA easements for the subject property. Please let us know what revisions are needed, if any. Paty—two questions: 1. What do we need to do to obtain the WPO? 2. What do we need to do for the County to sign the proposed plat? See third attachment. Thanks, Justin From: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 20218:37 AM To: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com> Cc: Will White <wwhite@roudabush.com>; Justin Ritter <Ir@ritterlawpllc.com>; Daniel Hyer <dhver@line-erade.com> Subject: RE: Follow Up Deeds Please submit for review all legal documents specified in the comments and associated with the plat. The County can not approve a vacation of property lines unless we see that the deed is signed by all owners and vacates the property lines. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle County psaternve@al bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecviIle.com> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2021 1:44 PM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.ore>; Will White <wwhite@roudabush.com>; Daniel Hyer <dhver@line-erade.com>; Justin Ritter <Jr@ritterlawpllc.com> Subject: Follow Up Deeds CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Paty, All, I believe we just need to execute and record the Deed for vacation of the property lines? Is there a county review of that requirement? Also Justin is working on the SWM deed of easement as well as utilities for ACSA and Century link and Dominion. We made progress on both fronts yesterday. As far as I can remember for moving forward with construction and disturbance we just need the Deed of vacation correct? Let me know our final steps to the finish line. We are pushing hard to wrap this up and get moving. Best Andrew Patricia "Paty" Saternye From: Patricia "Paty" Saternye Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 8:01 AM To: Daniel Hyer Cc: Andrew baldwin; Ryan Cheney, Justin Ritter; David James; Jeff Powell; Brian Jamison Subject: RE: Airport Road Sheetz WPO and Plat status Daniel, Thank you for that clarification. How I interpreted the email(s) was that you were looking for approval of the plat prior to providing some of the deeds. For my review (Planning) the deed of vacation of the easements (shown as being vacated on the plat) and the deed of vacation for the property lines (shown as being vacated on the plat) must be submitted for review and approval before plat approval. Please note that all owners of the easements must sign the deed of vacation for the easement. As was in a previous email, in reference to the SWIM Deed (Engineering): David James has corrected me in that the SWM deed of dedication does not need to be approved prior to the plat approval. It just has to be approved prior to the site plan approval." ACSA has "no objection" to the plat being approved. They handle their own deed review and approval (water and sanitary sewer) and they have not specified that it needs to be done before plat approval. Work with them on their deed in the timeline they specify. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle County psaternyeCcDal bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Daniel Hyer <dhyer@line-grade.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 20212:41 PM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org> Cc: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com>; Ryan Cheney <rcheney@line-grade.com>; Justin Ritter <jr@ritterlawpllc.com>; David James <djames2@albemarle.org>; Jeff Powell <1Powell@roudabush.com>; Brian Jamison <BJamison@roudabush.com> Subject: Re: Airport Road Sheetz WPO and Plat status CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Paty: The intention of Ryan's email was to coordinate the various pieces all converging toward a pending approval. As you know, these various documents need to be approved in a specific order. And at this time, most of these documents are either already on your desk or sitting somewhere in the County's queue. It is our hope that by having an email thread such as this one: all parties involved can be aware that the 1) Deeds, 2) Plats, and 3) VSMP/WPO permit documents are all converging. It is our hope that by this "coordination" effort, we can avoid unnecessary confusion and that the various documents can be reviewed/approved in appropriate order to avoid additional review cycles. As far as we know, everything is into the County, minus the deeds. And, I believe you will get those tomorrow. If this is not the case, and something is missing, please advise. Thank you, Paty! DANIEL HYER, PE 434.962.2430 dhverAline-arade.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-arade.00m On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 1:54 PM Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org> wrote: Could you please answer my question below that was "Could you please clarify what you are proposing? What specific documents/items are you proposing not to submit at this time? What do you want to get approved without them?" If I understand what you are trying to do and why I might be able to give you the correct answers now, and not later after you submit it again. You work with ACSA on any deeds they need for their easements. You work with Engineering on their SWM and Drainage easement (see emails from David James). In addition to those you are vacating both property lines and easements. Those are what you work with me. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle County psaternye@albem arle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 1:25 PM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> Cc: Ryan Cheney <rcheney@line-grade.com>; Daniel Hyer <dhver@line-grade.com>; Justin Ritter <ir@ritterlawpllc.com>; David James <diames2@albemarle.org>; Jeff Powell <1Powell@roudabush.com>; Brian Jamison <BJamison@roudabush.com> Subject: Re: Airport Road Sheetz WPO and Plat status CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Justin, see correspondence from everyone. We need to do the deed of vacation for the property lines I believe, along with the SWM easement for the plat to be approved. Paty, are you also looking for utility easements now?? Thanks On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 8:25 AM Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org> wrote: Ryan, Could you please clarify what you are proposing? What specific documents/items are you proposing not to submit at this time? What do you want to get approved without them? If it is the deed of vacation and the approval of the plat (currently under review), please note that because the vacation is shown on the plat the deed must be submitted, reviewed, and approved before the plat can be approved (14-212.2(b)(1). Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle Countv psaternye@al bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: David James <diames2@albemarle.org> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 1:19 PM To: Ryan Cheney <rcheney@line-grade.com>; Andrew Baldwin <andrew@corecville.com>; Brian Jamison <BJamison@roudabush.com>;Jeff Powell <JPowell@roudabush.com> Cc: Daniel Hyer <dhyer@line-grade.com>; Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org>; Justin Ritter <I r@ ritterlawpl Ic.com> Subject: RE: Airport Road Sheetz WPO and Plat status Ryan, Yes, its possible that the SWM easements can be recorded prior to the other easements so that the Wpo can be approved. Thanks, David James Original message From: Ryan Cheney <rcheney@line-grade.com> Date: 4/16/21 2:53 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Andrew Baldwin <andrew@corecville.com>, Brian Jamison <BJamison@roudabush.com>, Jeff Powell <JPowell@roudabush.com> Cc: Daniel Hyer <dhver@line-grade.com>, Patricia Paty Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org>, David James <diames2@albemarle.ors>, Justin Ritter <Ir@ritterlawpllc.com> Subject: Airport Road Sheetz WPO and Plat status CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Team, Hope you all are having a pleasant Friday. This email serves two purposes. 1) To inform everyone that Line and Grade is resubmitting the WPO/VSMP plan for Airport Road Sheetz today. Everything is in place for approval of that plan except for the recordation of the SWM easements, which leads me to: 2) The only thing holding up the approval of the plat and recordation of the SWIM easement is the deeds of easement and vacation need to be submitted to the County for review. Andrew: do you know the status of the deeds? When can we get them to Paty? Is there anything you need from us? Paty/David: can the SWM easement be recorded separately from the plat/other easements so the WPO can be approved, or must they be done together? Just trying to determine the quickest path to the grading permit. Thanks everyone, RYAN CHENEY, PE 434.262.0169 rcheney0line-drade.mm Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-arade.com ,.rR.CORE REAL ESTATE ANDREW BALDWIN PRINCIPAL BROKLR 0:434-422-5050 I d:434-422-5051 I m:434-466-6566 I f:434-326-1451 andrew@corecville.com I www.corecville.com 600 E. Water St., Suite H, Charlottesville, VA 22902 Patricia "Paty" Saternye From: Patricia "Paty" Saternye Sent: Thursday, April 1, 2021 8:51 AM To: Ryan Cheney Subject: RE: SDP-2020-00061 (Airport Road Sheetz) comment question Ryan, Good morning. Yes you are correct. Any changes that have legally taken place (been recorded) in ownership, parcel lines, Tax Map Parcel numbers, etc. must be changed before the site plan can be approved. After doing so, when you resubmit, please include (as separate documents) a PDF copy of the recorded deeds, plats, etc. for my reference so that there will be no question as to the changes already being recorded. The monument sign and the shrubs around its base must be removed from the site plan. You can work on your end to add a sheet to your construction drawings (not part of this site plan being reviewed by the County) once the sign permit has been submitted, reviewed, and approved by the County. Anything before that sign permit approval would not be correct and would just make it necessary to have the site plan amended if the sign and/or its required landscaping are not approved as (or where) you have shown. Please remove the monument sign, and the associated shrubs/plants immediately at its base, from the site plan as specified. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle County psaternyeCcDal bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Ryan Cheney <rcheney@line-grade.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 20213:33 PM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org> Subject: Re: SDP-2020-00061 (Airport Road Sheetz) comment question CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Hi Paty, Just following up on this to see if you can provide us any guidance on my question above. Also I have another question that came up: because the parcels changed hands and then were combined into a new parcel, our parcel labels from the original survey no longer reflect current ownership or parcel number. Should we change the parcel labels? Or leave them, as they reflect the original parcel layout at first submission? Thanks for your time, RYAN CHENEY, PE 434.262.0169 rchenevftline-arade.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient line-arade.00m On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 3:04 PM Ryan Cheney <rchenev@line-erade.com> wrote: Paty, Hope you are having a pleasant Friday. I wondered if you could help me to better understand the intent behind comment 8.h. of your most recent comment letter. The comment mentions to remove the monument sign and landscaping directly associated with it, as these are approved in a separate process and should not be shown on the site plan. However these plans also function as pricing sets for contractors, and as part of the lease agreement with Sheetz (which requires the sign to be shown), as well as an internal check to ensure conflicts between power/data conduits and landscaping are avoided. Would it sufficiently address this comment if we added a note to the plan indicating: "possible monument sign and landscaping location, subject to separate approval', or some other variant of this? Please let me know if this would be an acceptable alternative to removing; we can of course remove it as you requested if necessary. Thanks, RYAN CHENEY, PE 434.262.0169 rehenevOline-orade.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-arade.com Patricia "Paty" Saternye From: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 4:54 PM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye Subject: Re: SDP2020-61 Airport Road Sheets FSP RE: SUB2021-18 Airport Auto Combination Plat CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. cool... thanks! On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 4:46 PM Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org> wrote: Andrew, There are still comments pending from 3 reviewers. I will let you know more once all the comments are available. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle Count osaternveCo)al bemarle.ora 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Andrew baldwin <and rew(o)corecvi I le.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 20214:05 PM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org> Cc: brian@roudabush.com Subject: Re: SUB2021-18 Airport Auto Combination Plat This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Just checking in. Do we have comments back yet on final site plan? I see plat comments, which look minimal. Thanks Andrew On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 10:20 AM Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> wrote: Brian, ACSA has no objection to the 1'submission of SUB2021-18 Airport Auto Combination Plat. See the attached Engineering comments that will need to be addressed. You now have all of the comments from the reviewers and can move forward to address them unless you want to wait until the Site Plan comments are provided, just in case they impact any plat related items. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle Coun psaternyeC@al bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> Sent: Friday, February 26, 20213:09 PM To: brian@roudabush.com Cc: Daniel Hyer <dhver@line-erade.com>; Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com> Subject: SUB2021-18 Airport Auto Combination Plat Brian, Good afternoon. Attached please find the 1' round comments for SUB2021-18 Airport Auto Combination Plat. Please let me know if you have questions. Please note there are some slight differences between what is shown on the plat and what was shown on the most recent submission for the Site Plan. I have noted them in your comments and I will not them in the site plan comments when those are provided. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle Coun psaternyeC@al bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 0 0 Patricia "Paty" Saternye From: Ryan Cheney <rcheney@line-grade.com> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 3:04 PM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye Subject: SDP-2020-00061 (Airport Road Sheetz) comment question Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Paty, Hope you are having a pleasant Friday. I wondered if you could help me to better understand the intent behind comment 8.h. of your most recent comment letter. The comment mentions to remove the monument sign and landscaping directly associated with it, as these are approved in a separate process and should not be shown on the site plan. However these plans also function as pricing sets for contractors, and as part of the lease agreement with Sheetz (which requires the sign to be shown), as well as an internal check to ensure conflicts between power/data conduits and landscaping are avoided. Would it sufficiently address this comment if we added a note to the plan indicating: "possible monument sign and landscaping location, subject to separate approval', or some other variant of this? Please let me know if this would be an acceptable alternative to removing; we can of course remove it as you requested if necessary. Thanks, RYAN CHENEY, PE 434.262.0169 rchenevftline-arade.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-orade.00m Patricia "Paty" Saternye From: Patricia "Paty" Saternye Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 8:27 AM To: Ryan Cheney Subject: RE: Conservation Plan Checklist question - SDP-2020-00061 Ryan, Good morning. Since you will have the Owner Signature, and date, that is all you would need. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle Court psaternye0al bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Ryan Cheney <rcheney@line-grade.com> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 12:36 PM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org> Subject: Conservation Plan Checklist question - SDP-2020-00061 CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Paty, Quick question: now that the property has transferred ownership, we will have the owner sign on the 'owner signature" line per your comment (9.g.). But do we then leave the "contract purchaser" line blank? If not, who should be signing on that line? Thanks for the clarification. RYAN CHENEY, PE 434.262.0169 rchenevAline-arade.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-arade.00m Patricia "Paty" Saternye From: Khristopher Taggart Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 9:15 AM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye Subject: RE: ARB-2020-108: Airport Rd. Final Site Plan ARB Comments Morning Paty, I have added these comments to CV under a new review line. Thanks, Khris From: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org> Sent: Friday, March 19, 20217:51 AM To: Khristopher Taggart <ktaggart@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: ARB-2020-108: Airport Rd. Final Site Plan ARB Comments Khris, Good morning Q. Are you going to add these new comments for the SDP2020-61 Airport Road Sheetz FSP comments on County View as well? The FSP CV entry needs documentation that ARB still has outstanding comments that have to be addressed and what they are. The last entry for ARB comment in the FSP CV Reviews tab is still just states about the March 1" meeting, and "... comments will be provided..." Just adding a new comment line would probably be appropriate, and then copying the comments from your email into the comments box is probably enough. Do you want me to do that or would you rather do it? Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle County psaternye@al bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Khristopher Taggart <ktaggart@albemarle.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 10:16 AM To: Daniel Hyer <dhyer@line-grade.com> Cc: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com>; Ryan Cheney <rchenev@line-grade.com>; Margaret Maliszewski <MMaliszewski@albemarle.org>; Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> Subject: ARB-2020-108: Airport Rd. Final Site Plan ARB Comments Daniel, I have reviewed the above -noted resubmittal. This revised plan shows for the first time the locations of air machine and vacuum equipment. Entrance Corridor Guidelines require the elimination of visibility of equipment. The following revisions are requested to make the proposal consistent with the Entrance Corridor Guidelines. 1. Revise the shrubs along Airport Road and Rt. 29 to species that are available with a taller height at time of planting to more fully screen the air machines and vacuum station, and specify those taller planting heights. 2. Revise the color of the air machine and vacuum station equipment to one that is recessive; i.e., one that will reduce visibility and blend with the surroundings. Thanks, Khris Khris Taggart, Planner Albemarle County, Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 434-296-5832 ext. 3278 ktaggart@albemarle.org Patricia "Paty" Saternye From: Daniel Hyer <dhyer@line-grade.com> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 5:25 PM To: Khristopher Taggart Cc: Patricia "Paty" Saternye; Andrew baldwin; Ryan Cheney, Margaret Maliszewski Subject: Re: SDP2020-61 Airport Road Sheetz FSP RE: SUB2021-18 Airport Auto Combination Plat CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Thanks. Khris! Have a good weekend everyone! DANIEL HYER, PE 434.262.0169 dhyer@line-grade.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-grade.com (Sent from Mobile Device) On Mar 12, 2021, at 4:53 PM, Khristopher Taggart <ktaggart@albemarle.org> wrote: Daniel, We are awaiting comments from the chair of ARB. We hope to have a response by Monday. Thanks, Khris Khris Taggart, Planner Albemarle County, Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 434-296-5832 ext.3278 ktaggart@albemarle.org From: Daniel Hyer <dhyer@line-grade.com> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 11:28 AM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org> Cc: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com>; Ryan Cheney <rcheney@line-grade.com>; Khristopher Taggart <ktaggart@albemarle.org>; Margaret Maliszewski <MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> Subject: Re: SDP2020-61 Airport Road Sheetz FSP RE: SUB2021-18 Airport Auto Combination Plat CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Thank you, Paty. Kris or Margaret: Do you have any insights about the pending ARB letter or comments? Thanks everyone! DANIEL HYER, PE 434.962.2430 dhver(Mine-orade.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-arade.00m On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 8:27 AM Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> wrote: Daniel, Good morning. Attached please find the 3rd round comments for SDP2020-61 Airport Road Sheetz FSP. Please note that ARB comments are still pending. They will be forwarded to you once they are available. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle Count psaternyeCo)al bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 2 From: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 20214:54 PM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> Subject: Re: 5DP2020-61 Airport Road Sheets FSP RE: SUB2021-18 Airport Auto Combination Plat cool... thanks! On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 4:46 PM Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> wrote: Andrew, There are still comments pending from 3 reviewers. I will let you know more once all the comments are available. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle County psaternye@al bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 20214:05 PM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org> Cc: brian@roudabush.com Subject: Re: SUB2021-18 Airport Auto Combination Plat Just checking in. Do we have comments back yet on final site plan? I see plat comments, which look minimal. Thanks Andrew From: Ryan Cheney <rchenev@line-grade.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 1:07 PM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org> Cc: Daniel Hyer <dhyer@line-grade.com>; brian@roudabush.com; Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com>; Jeff Powell <JPowell@roudabush.com> Subject: Re: SUB2021-18 Airport Auto Combination Plat This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Great, will do. Thanks Paty RYAN CHENEY, PE 434.262.0169 rchenevOline-o rade.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-orade.com On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 12:06 PM Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye(@albemarle.org> wrote: Ryan, Thanks. Also, other than just not showing it in the proposed pages of the site plan Ip ease also call it out as "to be vacated" on the existing conditions sheet. Please note, the comments on the most recent Final Site Plan submittal have not been provided yet. So, no action is required at this time on the final site plan. Once the site plan submittal is reviewed by all reviewers then a full set of comments will be provided and include the item mentioned above. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle County psaternyePal bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Ryan Cheney <rchenev@line-grade.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 11:56 AM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.ore> Cc: Daniel Hyer <dhyer@line-grade.com>; brian@roudabush.com; Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com>; Jeff Powell <JPowell@roudabush.com> Subject: Re: SUB2021-18 Airport Auto Combination Plat CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Paty, The intent is to abandon the easement in question, as shown on the plat submission. On site plan sheet C1.0, a label points to the "Ex. Sprint/Centel & DVP EsmV which says: see plat for easement and property line abandonments. On sheet C4.0, the intended proposed condition is shown, and the easement in question does not appear on this sheet. On the most recent FSP submission, a layering error causes this easement to show up on the grading and utility plan sheets. We acknowledge our intention could have been more clear on the site plan; we will revise the easement labels and appearances accordingly on the next submission of the FSP. hope this clears up any confusion, please let me know if you have any more questions. Thanks, RYAN CHENEY, PE 434.262.0169 rchenev(a.line-orade.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-orade.com On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 8:06 AM Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> wrote: Daniel, Good morning. Could you specify on which page of the submitted 2/5 revision of the site plan the information specified in plat comment 4(a) (the vacation of the sprint/centel easement) is already provided? Maybe I just missed it. This is usually noted, under the existing easement label, with "To be vacated". <image001.jpg> Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle Court psaternye@al bemarle.orq 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Daniel Hyer<dhver@line-erade.com> Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 10:48 AM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> Cc: brian@roudabush.com; Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com>; Jeff Powell <JPowell@roudabush.com>; Ryan Cheney <rcheney@line-grade.com> Subject: Re: SUB2021-18 Airport Auto Combination Plat CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Hi Paty, One clarification: when you say the most recent site plan, do you mean the site plan submitted on 2/5/2021? It seems curious that these don't match as the line work for both should have been the same. Before we dig into looking for the discrepancy I just wanted to ensure that you were not looking at the November 23rd documents when you made this comment. Thanks, DANIEL HYER, PE 434.962.2430 dhver0line-orade.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-arade.00m On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 3:09 PM Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org> wrote: Brian, Good afternoon. Attached please find the V round comments for SUB2021-18 Airport Auto Combination Plat. Please let me know if you have questions. Please note there are some slight differences between what is shown on the plat and what was shown on the most recent submission for the Site Plan. have noted them in your comments and I will not them in the site plan comments when those are provided. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle Countv psaternyeC@albem arle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 Patricia "Paty" Saternye From: Jason Devillier <JDevillier@gocho.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 12:19 PM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye Cc: Jason Burch Subject: CHO Contact for Airport Road Sheetz CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Good Morning Paty, I reviewed the Airport Road Sheetz Project plans on the County web site, and noted they call for the protection of the stone monument and associated landscape at that location. On behalf of the Airport Authority I want to thank you and Community Development for your part in protecting the monument. These monuments are an aesthetically inviting gateway to CHO, and valuable in directing passengers and airport users. Thank you again. If I may assist you and Community Development in any way, please don't hesitate to contact me. Jason CHO A I R P O R T F. Jason Devillier, C.M. Director of Operations, Maintenance & Construction Charlottesville -Albemarle Airport 100 Bowen Loop, Suite 200 Charlottesville, VA 22911 (434) 973-8342, Ext. 103 (434) 974-7476 (FAX) (434) 981-7944 (cell) ©GBAC-TRAINED TECHNICIAN`" CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipientfs) and may contain confidential and privileged information or otherwise be protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Patricia "Paty" Saternye From: Margaret Maliszewski Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 3:20 PM To: Chris Jaeger Cc: Patricia "Paty" Saternye Subject: RE: property transaction question Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Chris,Paty Saternye is the lead planner on the Sheetz site plan review, located at the northwest corner of Rt. 29 and Airport Rd. My understanding is that the airport signage at the corner is in the right-of-way and is not impacted by the proposal. The site plan does not yet have final approval. Paty, Can you please confirm that the plan shows no changes to the airport sign? Thanks. Margaret Margaret Maliszewski Planning Manager, Department of Community Development Albemarle County From: Chris Jaeger <CJaeger@tbiric.com> Sent: Monday, February 8, 20213:15 PM To: Margaret Maliszewski <MMaliszewski@albemarle.org> Subject: RE: property transaction question CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. I spoke to Jason Devillier at the airport and they caught wind of a property transaction occurring, I think it was either for a Wawa or Sheetz, that could impact some of the airport's existing signage. They just want to speak to someone to make sure the signage is protected with whatever development occurs. I'm trying to help point them to the right person to talk to. Sorry I'm not 100% sure of the parcel info, but it is near Airport Road and Route 29. Thank you, Chris From: Margaret Maliszewski <MMaliszewski@albemarle.ore> Sent: Monday, February 08, 20213:09 PM To: Chris Jaeger <CJaeser@tbiric.com> Subject: RE: property transaction question Hi, Chris. Can you tell me a little more? Are you trying to figure out what sign area you'll be allowed after the transaction? Are you trying to find out which planner reviewed the transaction? Something else? Margaret Margaret Maliszewski Planning Manager, Department of Community Development Albemarle County From: Chris Jaeger <CJaeeer@tbiric.com> Sent: Monday, February 8, 20213:02 PM To: Margaret Maliszewski <MMaliszewski@albemarle.org Subject: property transaction question CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Hi Margaret, I'm hoping you can help point me in the right direction — I'm trying to figure out who within the Community Development Department I should tell the Airport Director to speak to about a recent property transaction near Route 29 and Airport Road that may impact some of the airport's signage. I tried calling the general inquiry line (extension 8) but its trying to make me leave a message without being able to speak with anyone. Thanks for any help that you can provide! -Chris Christopher R. Jaeger, P.E. TALBERT & BRIGHT 10105 Krause Road Chesterfield, VA 23832 P: 804-768-6878 F: 804-768-6871 www.talbertandbright.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This a -mail message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Patricia "Paty" Saternye From: Daniel Hyer <dhyer@line-grade.com> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 1:43 PM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye Cc: Ryan Cheney; David James Subject: Re: Submission Confirmation request (Transaction #00011477) CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Thanks, Paty. Yes, we are aware. The WPO drawings will be uploaded momentarily and David will get a similar email as you did notifying him. Thanks. Let us know if you have any other items we need to communicate/coordinate together. thanks! DANIEL HYER, PE 434.962.2430 dhver(a line-orade.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-arade.com On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 1:41 PM Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org> wrote: Ryan, I see that files have been submitted for the project. Please note that Engineering and not Planning are the lead reviewers on WPOs. So, any communication about the WPO should be with David James, who I have copied on this email. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle County psaternye@aIbem arle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Ryan Cheney <rchenev@line-grade.com> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 1:07 PM To: CDD Submittal <CDDSubmittal@albemarle.org> Cc: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org>; Daniel Hyer <dhver@line-grade.com> Subject: Submission Confirmation request (Transaction #00011477) CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Good afternoon, Line and Grade has just electronically resubmitted the Final Site Plan SDP-2020-00061 Airport Road Sheetz (please note the associated WPO will be submitted separately today). One hardcopy will be submitted to the County as well. Please confirm that the submission has been received, and if anything further is required from us to begin processing this submission. Thank you, RYAN CHENEY, PE 434.262.0169 rchenevOline-o rade.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-amde.com Patricia "Paty" Saternye From: Ryan Cheney <rcheney@line-grade.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 4:56 PM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye Cc: Daniel Hyer Subject: Re: SDP2020-61 Airport FSP CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Paty, Thanks for the follow up and clarification on the code. The label of the flagpole was mistakenly omitted on our last submission. It will be shown on the next submission, as will other information clarifying the mount and details for the other fixtures. Have a good evening, RYAN CHENEY, PE 434.262.0169 rcheney(Mi ne-g rade.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-arade.com On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 3:40 PM Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org> wrote: Ryan, Good afternoon. I got your voicemail, and tried to return the call but was unable to leave a message. You are correct flag pole lighting is exempt (for US and VA flags only) from our outdoor lighting regulations (see 18- 4.17.6(c)). So whatever light fixtures are lighting a flag pole do not need to meet the regs. However, in looking into your question: I don't see where a flag pole is shown on the site plan. Please ensure the flag pole is shown and is clearly labeled. That way I will know to not apply the regulations to that fixture. I think you stated that luminaire "F" is the light in question, which is near the carwash. However, when I look at the Luminaire Details sheet, and the cutsheet for the different fixtures, "F" appears to be a typical (top down) parking lot light fixture (QSQ), which would not be typical for lighting a flag pole. Please ensure that the correct manufacture cut sheet is provided and clearly labeled for the light fixture(s) being used for the flag pole. Ensure all luminaires not lighting the flag pole address the comments and meet the ordinances and guidelines. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle Coun psaternyePalbem arle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 20214:17 PM To: Daniel Hyer <dhver@line-grade.com> Cc: Ryan Cheney <rcheney@line-grade.com>; Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com>; Adam Rogers <Adam.Rogers@bohlereng.com> Subject: RE: SDP2020-61 Airport FSP Daniel, Good evening. Attached please find the 2nd round comments for SDP2020-61 Airport Road Sheetz FSP. FYI, Andrew contacted me earlier today about "wrapping things up". The timeline he has stated and the fad that some of the comments have not been addressed yet appear to conflict. Please revise items to address all comments, and submit all items specified in the comments such as the easement plat, for review and approval. Please note, as stated in the comments, the easement plat is a separate application, submission and fee and must be submitted, reviewed and approved prior to recordation. Since this included ACSA easement and Stormwater Management easement I will be distributing them to ACSA and Engineering for review once you have submitted them to me. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle County psaternye@albem arle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 20218:44 AM To: Daniel Hyer <dhyer@line-Brade.com> Cc: Ryan Cheney <rchenev@line-arade.com> Subject: RE: Airport FSP Daniel, Good morning. I hope to have the full packet of comments to you in the next few days. Most of the comments are already available on County View. Once I have the planning comments completed I will forward you the packed of all of the reviewers comments. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle County psaternyePaI bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Daniel Hyer <dhyer@line-grade.com> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2021 11:28 AM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> Cc: Ryan Cheney <rchenev@line-grade.com> Subject: Airport FSP CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Hi Paty: Did you have any chance to collect the final site plan comments for the Airport Road FSP? Let us know if/when we might expect to receive those. Thanks, DANIEL HYER, PE 434.962.2430 dhverftline-orade.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-arade.com Patricia "Paty" Saternye From: Patricia "Paty" Saternye Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 4:17 PM To: Daniel Hyer Cc: Ryan Cheney, Andrew baldwin; Adam Rogers Subject: RE: SDP2020-61 Airport FSP Attachments: SDP2020-61 2nd round comments 1-12-2020.pdf Daniel, Good evening. Attached please find the 2"' round comments for SDP2020-61 Airport Road Sheetz FSP. FYI, Andrew contacted me earlier today about "wrapping things up". The timeline he has stated and the fact that some of the comments have not been addressed yet appear to conflict. Please revise items to address all comments, and submit all items specified in the comments such as the easement plat, for review and approval. Please note, as stated in the comments, the easement plat is a separate application, submission and fee and must be submitted, reviewed and approved prior to recordation. Since this included ACSA easement and Stormwater Management easement I will be distributing them to ACSA and Engineering for review once you have submitted them to me. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle County psaternye0al bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 20218:44 AM To: Daniel Hyer <dhyer@line-grade.com> Cc: Ryan Cheney <rcheney@line-grade.com> Subject: RE: Airport FSP Daniel, Good morning. I hope to have the full packet of comments to you in the next few days. Most of the comments are already available on County View. Once I have the planning comments completed I will forward you the packed of all of the reviewers comments. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle County psaternyeCcDal bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Daniel Hyer <dhyer@line-grade.com> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2021 11:28 AM To: Patricia "Paty" Saternye <psaternye6@albemarle.or¢> Cc: Ryan Cheney <rcheney@line-grade.com> Subject: Airport FSP CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Hi Paty: Did you have any chance to collect the final site plan comments for the Airport Road FSP? Let us know if/when we might expect to receive those. Thanks, DANIEL HYER, PE 434.962.2430 dhverAline-orade.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-arade.com Patricia "Paty" Saternye From: Patricia "Paty" Saternye Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 8:28 AM To: Daniel Hyer; Andrew baldwin Cc: Ryan Cheney; Lee May Subject: SDP2020-61 Airport Road Sheetz FSP Daniel & Andrew, I just wanted to let you know that staff did not have any comments on the previously recorded easement agreement for the access easement and the temporary construction easement in that same area. Also, just an update, we are still waiting on some of the reviewers for comments on SDP2020-61 Airport Road Sheetz FSP, but I have uploaded the comments we have so far to County View. I will forward you the whole comments packet once it is available. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle County psaternye@al bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Patricia Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 9:24 AM To: Daniel Hyer <dhyer@line-grade.com>; David James <djames2@albemarle.org> Cc: Ryan Cheney <rcheney@line-grade.com>; Lee May <vmay@sheetz.com>; Khristopher Taggart <ktaggart@albemarle.org>; Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com> Subject: RE: Updated Airport Road Sheetz FSP and WPO Thank you for letting me know. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle County psaternye@al bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Daniel Hyer<dhver@line-grade.com> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 5:53 PM To: Patricia Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org>; David James <diames2@albemarle.org> Cc: Ryan Cheney <rchenev@line-grade.com>; Lee May <vmav@sheetz.com>; Khristopher Taggart <ktaggart@albemarle.org>; Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com> Subject: Updated Airport Road Sheetz FSP and WPO CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Paty, David, The revised documents for Airport Road Sheetz have been submitted to the County's Planning Website SDP-2020-00061 FSP Attn: Paty Saternye WPO-2020-00043 WPO Attn: David James Links above are for your reference should you need to download them from our server for some reason. Daivd, the VRRM Spreadsheet is attached to this email per your request. Please let our team know if you need anything else to support this resubmission. Thanks! DANIEL HYER, PE 434.962.2430 dhver(cbline-orade.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-arade.com LINE+GRADE C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER November 201h, 2020 TO: Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 ATTN: Paty Saternye, Senior Planner RE: Airport Road Sheetz — SDP-2020-00061 11 round Comment Response Letter Dear Ms. Saternye, On behalf of Airport Plaza, LLC we offer the following responses and plan revisions to comments dated October 22nd, 2020.Our Responses are in bold italic text below each comment. Planning — Poty Saternye 1. (Original comment 2.) A site plan meeting all the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code. FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. A site plan has been submitted per the above referenced code. Please clarify/identify specific deficiencies of section 32.6 if any remain besides those specifically commented on below. 2. (3.) [32.5.2(a)] General information. Revise the following: a. (b.) Revise the parcel information for TMP 32-39 to include the Steep Slopes — Managed overlay district information. Also, revise the site plan to show the managed slopes information. The area of managed slopes in this parcel appears to be very small and crossing the western property line. FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. Since the E&S sheets will be removed from the site plan (see Engineering comments) it will be necessary to ensure the Steep Slopes — Managed information will still be provided in the sheets that remain. The existing conditions sheets show the Steep Slopes — Managed areas, but still require either labels or a legend symbol to clearly locate these areas. L I N E + GRADE CIVIL ENGINEERING 11341h STREET NE, STE. 100 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 LINE-GRADE.COM Airport Road Sheetz — SDP-2020-00061 1" Round Comment Response Letter November 20`h, 2020 1 Page 2 The managed steep slopes hatch from GIS also appears on sheets C1.0, C3.0, C4.0, C5.0, C6.0, etc. A legend has been added to sheet C0.2 indicating the hatch, and the hatch has been labeled directly on the site plan. (i.) This site plan is based upon a boundary line adjustment. Therefore, address the following: i. (a.) A boundary line adjustment plat must be submitted (separate application, fee, and submission) and approved prior to the approval of the final site plan. FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment. ii. (b.) The plat at the back of the site plan should be removed prior to final site plan submission. FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment. iii. (c.) The final site plan must show all of the required information and not refer to a plat that is a separate document. FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment. iv. (d.) The final site plan should show the existing parcels but also show the proposed BLA parcels. FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment. A boundary line adjustment plat will be submitted prior to approval. The exhibit on sheet X2.0 has been removed. 3. (6.) [32.5.2(j), (k) & (1)]] Existing sewer and drainage facilities; Private & public easements; Existing and proposed utilities. Address the following: a. (b.) See engineering comments in reference to required storm drainage easements and modification that will be required. FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. See engineering comments in reference to required storm drainage. Acknowledged. See responses to engineering comments below. b. (c.) Revise the site plan to show any existing or proposed waterline easements. In the southwest corner, where the water meters are proposed, no easements are shown or labeled for water. FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. Although the Fire Hydrant appears to have sufficient easement around it the proposed water meter appears to be places on the edge of the proposed water easement. Water meters typically require the easements to have an additional area around the meter as part of the easements. Ensure the proposed water meters have the required easement area around both of them. The proposed water meters have been relocated to be within the proposed easement with sufficient working space around the meters. See revised sheet C6.0. L I N E + GRADE CIVIL ENGINEERING 113 4`" STREET NE, STE. 100 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 LINE-GRADE.COM Airport Road Sheetz — SDP-2020-00061 1" Round Comment Response Letter November 20`h, 2020 1 Page 3 c. (d.) On the western parcel boundary line there is an existing storm pipe that crosses the property boundary. Show all existing or proposed easements for this pipe and the associated grates the rights of all involved are not already covered by the VDOT drainage easement. FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment. No record of any existing easements for the existing pipe could be found, other than what is shown on the survey. All rights of entry and maintenance are covered under the existing VDOT drainage easement which completely encompasses these facilities on the subject property. Therefore, no additional easements are proposed. d. (e.) An easement plat must be submitted (separate application, fee, and submission) and approved prior to the approval of the final site plan. FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment. Acknowledged. A separate plat will be recorded prior to FSP approval once all comments affecting easement geometry are resolved. e. (f.) Include the abandonment of any easement in the proposed easement plat. FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment. The proposed easement plat will show any abandoned easements. f. (g.) A proposed gas line easement is shown. An easement plat will be required. Work with gas provider to establish this easement. FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment. Comment noted. We will work with the Gas provided and establish the appropriate easement prior to approval. 4. (7.) [32.5.2(m) & 32.5.2.(i)] Ingress and egress; Streets, easements and travelways. Address the following: a. (a.) An offsite easement is required for ingress egress, a temporary construction easement and a permanent access easement. FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment. b. (c.) Ensure that the deed for the access easement included maintenance agreement details. FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment. c. (d.) An easement plat must be submitted (separate application, fee, and submission) and approved prior to the approval of the final site plan. FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment. d. (e.) Ensure that the deed for the access easement, submitted with the plat, includes maintenance agreement details that meet the Counties minimum L I N E + GRADE CIVIL ENGINEERING 113 4`" STREET NE, STE. 100 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 LINE-GRADE.COM Airport Road Sheetz — SDP-2020-00061 1" Round Comment Response Letter November 20`h, 2020 1 Page 4 requirements. FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment. Acknowledged. A separate plat will be recorded prior to FSP approval once all comments affecting easement geometry are resolved. 5. (8.) [32.5.2(n)] Existing and proposed improvements. Address the following: a. (b.) Revise the plan to include a detail for the screening fence. FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. A screening fence is no longer specified as being on top of the retaining wall. If this fence to be included, then include a detail for the screening fence in the site plan. At this time, this project is still awaiting final ARB approval. Until such time, we will hold off on finalizing this detail to ensure that it matches what ARB approves. (d.) Revise the plan to include a detail for the dumpster enclosure. FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. Address the following: i. (1.) Revise the provided detail to include the height of the walls. ii. (2.) Ensure that all portions of the wall and gates have a minimum height of 6' (32.7.9.7(e)). The smaller of the two gates is labeled to have a height of 5'-2". iii. (3.) Ensure that the dumpster pad meets the minimum requirements. The concrete dumpster pad must be at least eight feet beyond the front of the dumpster, and therefore in front of the gate. At this time, this project is still awaiting final ARB approval. Until such time, we will hold off on finalizing these details to ensure that it matches what ARB approves. c. (g.) Show all street/accessway signage on the plan, ensure it is shown on the layout and landscaping sheets, and ensure there are no conflicts with landscaping. FINAL: Comment not vet fully addressed. Please eet anv clarification on required signs from engineering. In reference to this comment, show all existing and proposed signs in the Landscape Plan sheet and ensure that there are not conflicts between the signage and the landscaping. At this time, this project is still awaiting final ARB approval. Until such time, we will hold off on finalizing these details to ensure that it matches what ARB LINE + approves. GRADE 6. (9.) [32.5.2.(e), 32.5.2.(p) & 32.6.2(j)] Landscape plan. A landscape plan is required in the final site plan that complies with section 32.7.9. A landscape plan C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G was submitted but requires additional information for the final site plan. Such 1134`^STREET NE, STE. 100 information should include, but is not limited to, the following: CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 LINE-GRADE.COM Airport Road Sheetz — SDP-2020-00061 1" Round Comment Response Letter November 20`h, 2020 1 Page 5 a. (e.) Provide the required shrubs between the parking spaces and Airport Road in the area of the HC ramp. Some shrubs could be provided at the lot side of the ramp and some could be provided at the roadside. FINAL: Comment addressed. b. (f.) Ensure area that utilized to meet the interior parking landscaping bed requirement is planted with landscaping, not just one tree in a much larger area, and is around the parking. The hatched island at the corner of the building could be changed to a planting bed and provide additional area. Do not claim areas not adjacent to parking, especially when it is above the required amount. FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. Significant areas of beds hatched as "Interior Planting Areas" have no plantings shown in them in the Landscape Plan sheet. The bed to the north of the main building and the bed between the main building and the carwash area must have plantings (at least shrubs if not trees and shrubs) in them to be considered "planting areas". Interior Planting Areas have been reduced to areas adjacent to parking, and planted with a combination of landscape material including shrubs, ornamental grasses, and trees. c. (g.) Include in the site plan a filled out, signed, and dated conservation checklist. FINAL: Comment not vet fully addressed. Ensure that the owner of the site also siens the Conservation Checklist. The subject parcel is subject to sale of the property to the contract purchaser before the end of calendar year 2010. Therefore we have only included the purchaser signature who will be the owner in the near term. d. (h.) Include in the existing conditions, grading and landscape sheets tree protection fencing around all existing trees that are to remain and include tree protection fencing details in the site plan. FINAL: Comment not yet full addressed. Ensure that on all three sheets (existing conditions. eradine & landscaping) the: i. (1.) Tree Protection Fence line work is actually shown. It is shown in the Landscape Plan, but it does not appear to be shown in the Grading and Drainage Sheet or the Site Plan Sheet. Only the limits of clearing and grading appears to be shown in those two sheets. ii. (2.) Tree protection Fence line work is either clearly labeled or the linetype is included in a legend that specifically calls it out as "Tree Protection Fencing". There does not appear to be any labels in either the existing conditions sheet or in the site plan sheet. In the landscaping sheet it is labeled, but the label is cryptic (TP 91 LF) and nowhere on the sheet does it specify what the "TP" symbol in a circle represents. L I N E + GRADE CIVIL ENGINEERING 113 4`" STREET NE, STE. 100 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 LINE-GRADE.COM Airport Road Sheetz — SDP-2020-00061 1" Round Comment Response Letter November 20`h, 2020 1 Page 6 Tree protection fencing has been labeled additionally on the landscape plan. e. (i.) FINAL: [New Comment] Revise or remove the "ADA Route/Sidewalk Not Applicable 30 LF" and ensure that portion of the frontage is included in the frontage calculations. Dimensional note on Airport road and tabulations have been adjusted. (10.) [32.5.2(n) & 32.6.2(k)] Outdoor lighting. In reference to the photometric plan address the following: a. (b.) Revise the Luminaire Schedule to have LLF value for all fixtures and update the table accordingly. FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. LLF must be 1.0. Revise the chart and calculations for an LLF of 1.0 on all luminaries/fixtures. Comment noted. Please refer to the revised photometric plan. We also acknowledged this is subject to ARB. b. (c.) Revise the Luminaire Schedule to have values for the total lamp lumens. FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Revise the charts to contain Total Lamp Lumens and ensure that the column is labeled accordingly. Although the values may be shown in the chart, not chart column is labeled accordingly. Comment noted. Please refer to the revised photometric plan. We also acknowledged this is subject to ARe. c. (d.) Ensure that all product manufacturer cutsheets are provided in the site plan and include pictures or details that allow determination that they are "full cut off". FINAL: Comment not vet fully addressed. Address the followine: i. (1.) Provide manufacturer cutsheets, that include pictures, for fixture "B" (BKLT CH — LED-e69-FL-BZP-12) lighting fixture if it is to be included in the site plan. Otherwise remove it from the photometric plan and the Luminaire Schedule. ii. (2.) Revise the light fixtures so that none can be tilted. Lights that tilt are not considered full cut off. Therefore "F" (QSQ-AAXX- w/PGM-1 + OSQ-A-NM-I5D-B-57K-UL-XX) does not meet the full cut off requirement and must be revised. iii. (3.) Clarify how light fixture "F" is mounted and how it is at almost ground level when all the other OSQ series are mounted on a pole. iv. (4.) Clarify what "Set to switch position 3 in field" refers to for fixture "A" (CAN-226-PS-RS-06-E-UL-XX-700). Please note that titling would not meet the "full cut off' requirements. L I N E + GRADE CIVIL ENGINEERING 113 4`" STREET NE, STE. 100 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 LINE-GRADE.COM Airport Road Sheetz — SDP-2020-00061 1" Round Comment Response Letter November 20`h, 2020 1 Page 7 Comment noted. Please refer to the revised photometric plan. We also acknowledged this is subject to ARB. (e.) FINAL: [NEW COMMENT] Revise the Symbols in the Luminaire Schedule to be the same color, darkness, and shape as those shown in the Photometric Plan. It is hard to differentiate the colors from each other in the schedule and the colors in the schedule do not appear to match those in the plan. Also, at least one symbols not match ("F") between the two and other do not appear to match because of scale, color, and darkness. Comment noted. Please refer to the revised photometric plan. We also acknowledged this is subject to ARB. e. (f.) Light fixture "B" does not appear to be shown on the plan. Either make it obvious where the 12 fixtures are located or remove them from the Luminaire Schedule if they are not shown in the Photometric Plan. Items not fully incorporated in the site plan cannot be approved with the site plan. Comment noted. Please refer to the revised photometric plan. We also acknowledged this is subject to ARB. f. (R.) FINAL: [NEW COMMENTI Ensure that the resolution of the photometric plan and the manufacture cutsheets are sufficient resolution to be able to read all text, including the smallest. Comment noted. See revised plans. if resolution is still unsatisfactory we will work with the consultant to further improve the quality. 8. (13.) See the SRC comments from most of the reviewers attached. All SRC reviewer comments must be sufficiently address prior to final site plan approval. FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. See the comments from most of the reviewers attached. ARB comments are still pending (see below). All reviewer comments must be sufficiently address prior to final site plan approval. Comment noted. 9. (14.) UPDATE: [NEW COMMENT] The final site plan will not be approved until an ARB Certificate of Appropriateness has been granted. Additional revisions have been made to the site layout, based upon ARB comments, that have not been shown on the version of the initial site plan (see note top of "UPDATE" comments) being reviewed. ARB review of the Initial Site Plan has not been finalized/completed, revisions to the site plan to meet ARB comments have been made since the site plan submission date, and additional revisions may be required. Additional discussion and review of the site plan is on the agenda for the 9/21/2020 ARB meeting. Any revisions to the site plan from the original L I N E + GRADE CIVIL ENGINEERING 113 4`" STREET NE, STE. 100 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 LINE-GRADE.COM Airport Road Sheetz — SDP-2020-00061 1" Round Comment Response Letter November 20`h, 2020 1 Page 8 submission date to meet ARB requirements will be reviewed by all reviewers during the final site plan review process. FINAL: Comment not vet fully addressed. The final site plan will not be approved until an ARB Certificate of Appropriateness has been granted. ARB meeting on the Final Site Plan is still pending. Comment noted. Engineering — David James 10. (Original comment 1.) The VSMP plan will need approval prior to FSP approval. Acknowledged. See VSMP plan submission. 11. (2.) Record Plat for SWM facility easements, Access, Temporary Construction, Forest/Open Space, Drainage Easements needed prior to FSP approval. Acknowledged. See response to comment 4.d. above. 12. (3.) Please remove the E&SC, SWIM, and drainage design sheets from the FSP — Sheets C2.0 thru C2.8, C7.0 thru C7.6. The WPO/VSMP and FSP sheets have been separated as requested. See attached submission. 13. (4.) C3.1—Show the turn and taper lane lengths and widths labeled. Taper at 12:1 with 12' lane widths. Entrance geometry at Rte. 29 has been revised per discussion with VDOT in regard to their comments. See responses to MOT comments below and image below for a summary of entrance geometry changes. L I N E + GRADE CIVIL ENGINEERING 113 4`" STREET NE, STE. 100 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 LINE-GRADE.COM Airport Road Sheetz — SDP-2020-00061 1" Round Comment Response Letter November 20t5, 2020 1 Page 9 -- --� � 50'R, offset 12' from Ex. EP ,. 50'R, no offset \ \` 1 4taper propcurb to tie to excurb intersection j maintaining 17 turn lane width I (measured from prop- GP edge to thru lane) 14. (5.) Sheet C4.1: Show a stone base thickness of 6" for C&G (21-A or better); 4" shown. The stone base for the curb and gutter detail has been revised to be 6" thick. 15. (6.) Provide retaining wall design for walls over 4' high. Comment noted. Final retaining wall will be designed following ARB acceptance of the general design. 16. (7.) Walls over 3' will need separate building permit. Acknowledged. A building permit for the retaining wall will be applied for separately. 17. (8.) Walls over 30" will need safety railing. A railing is proposed on top of the only retaining wall on site. The detail can be found on sheet C4.1. 18. (9.) Show and label SWM facility & access easements. SWM facility easements are labeled on sheet C4.0, sheets C7.5, and C7.7. Access to the facilities will be provided through these easements. L I N E Fire & Rescue —Shawn Maddox 19. (Original comment 1.) If the building is going to be sprinklered an FDC must be GRADE shown and a hydrant located within 100' of the FDC. CIVIL ENGINEERING The building will not be sprinklered. 113 4`" STREET NE, STE. 100 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 20. (2.) The ISO needed fire flow for the building is required. LINE-GRADE.COM Airport Road Sheetz — SDP-2020-00061 1" Round Comment Response Letter November 201h, 2020 1 Page 10 Needed fire flow calculations can now be found on revised sheet C0.2. 21. (3.) Provide the currently available fire flow for the site from a recent ACSA fire flow test. Fire flow data is now provided on revised sheet C0.1. 22. (4.) A Knox box is required. Please indicate this requirement with a note on the plan. The location can be coordinated with the fire marshal's office. This note can be found on sheet C4.0 under Site Plan Notes. VDOT— Max Greene 23. (Original comment 1.) The curb radii should be offset from the EP along Rte. 29 SBL. Per page F-108 in the VDOT road design manual, Appendix F. As discussed in email correspondence, the geometry of the Rte. 29 entrance has been revised to provide continuous curbing from the proposed entrance to the existing curbing at the intersection with Airport Road (south side). The geometry has also been revised to provide a taper from the existing edge of pavement to the proposed curb return end on the north side of the entrance. See revised sheet C4.0. 24. (2.) Please add a note to plan: A Traffic Maintenance Plan (TMP) is required to obtain a permit to work within VDOT Right of Way. The TMP shall be prepared by an Advanced Work Zone Certified person, certification card with verification number is required on the TMP submittal. This note has been added as note 1 under Maintenance of Traffic on revised sheet CO. 1. 25. (3.) Please show and label "mill and overlay' areas to adjacent travel lane in accordance with WP-2. The mill and overlay areas are now shown and labeled on revised sheet C3.0. 26. (4.) Please add the WP-2 detail to the plans. This detail can now be found on revised sheet C4.2. L I N E + CDD Inspections — Michael Dellinger GRADE 27. Add the following note to the general notes page: "Buildings or structures built before January 1, 1985 must have an asbestos survey performed in order to C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G apply for a demolition permit. Asbestos removal permits are required if positive 1134`^STREET NE, STE. 100 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 LINE-GRADE.COM Airport Road Sheetz — SDP-2020-00061 1" Round Comment Response Letter November 201h, 2020 1 Page 11 for such from Albemarle County and VDOLI. Contact VDOLI for their additional requirements and permits for demolition projects at 540-562-3580 x131." This note has been added to sheet CO.1 under miscellaneous. 28. Add the following note to the general notes page: "Accessible parking spaces, access aisles, and accessible route shall be installed in accordance with ICC ANSI A117.1-09 and the 2015 Virginia Construction Code." This note has been added to sheet CO.1 under miscellaneous. 29. Provide details of accessible spaces, access aisles, and signage. Details of parking spaces and signage can now be found on revised sheet C4.1. 30. Add the following note to the general notes page: "All roof drains shall discharge in a manner not to cause a public nuisance and not over sidewalks." This note has been added to sheet CO.1 under miscellaneous. ACSA — Richard Nelson 31. Submit 3 copies and PDF of the utility plan to ACSA for review and approval. Acknowledged. See submission package. 32. Relocate proposed light pole outside proposed ACSA easement. The light pole has been relocated outside the easement. See revised sheet C6.0. 33. Provide fixture counts and proposed flow rates to confirm water meter size. Demand has been calculated from actual water demand data from existing Sheetz stores, as provided by Sheetz. Meter sizing calculations are now provided on sheet C0.1. 34. Revise 6x2" tapping sleeve to a 1" Corp. stop. The tapping sleeves have been revised to 1" corporation stops. See revised sheet C6.1. Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority Sheet C6.0 35. Please refer to RWSA notes for making a tap connection to the RWSA 12" WL and include on plan and profile sheet "Wet Tap on RWSA Waterline". L I N E + GRADE CIVIL ENGINEERING 113 4`" STREET NE, STE. 100 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 LINE-GRADE.COM Airport Road Sheetz — SDP-2020-00061 1' Round Comment Response Letter November 20`h, 2020 1 Page 12 The connection is now called out as required on plan and profile. Contractor is directed to RWSA notes in plan view label. See revised sheets C6.0 and C6.2. 36. Add the following note to the utility plan sheet that shows the proposed connection: "Contractor shall coordinate with RWSA and ACSA for the connection to the existing RWSA 12" waterline. Contractor shall use due diligence to protect the RWSA 12" waterline during construction and tapping. Contractor shall verify the horizontal and vertical location, the outside diameter and the pipe material of the 12" waterline prior to ordering the tapping sleeve. RWSA shall be contacted 3 business days in advance of the test pit and shall be present during the test pit. The tapping sleeve shall be approved by RWSA prior to being ordered. The tapping contractor shall be approved by RWSA prior to the tap. A minimum of 3 business days' notice shall be given prior to installation of the tapping sleeve. The 12"x6" tapping sleeve and valve shall be installed plumb. Following the placement and testing of the 12"x6" tapping sleeve and valve, a concrete pad and thrust block shall be placed under and behind the tapping sleeve and allowed to set prior to making the tap. These notes now appear on both plan and profile sheets. See revised sheets C6.0 and C6.2. Sheet C8.1 37. No trees within 10 feet of RWSA 12" waterline. No trees are proposed within 10' of the RWSA 12" line. See revised sheet C8.1. L I N E + GRADE CIVIL ENGINEERING 1134`h STREET NE, STE. 100 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 LINE-GRADE.COM Patricia "Paty" Saternye From: Daniel @ Line and Grade <dhyer@line-grade.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2020 10:58 AM To: Patricia Saternye Cc: Andrew baldwin Subject: Re: Sheetz Easement Paperwork CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Hi Paty, Yes, we intend to resubmit the site plan this month. Hopefully by mid -month. I'll update you as I know more. Thanks, DANIEL HYER, PE 434.962.2430 dhver(obIine-era le.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-arade.com On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 5:03 PM Patricia Saternye <psaternveCa@albemarle.org> wrote: Andrew, Good evening. Thank you for the submittal of the entry easement last week. We were meant to review it as part of a plat submittal, prior to recordation, but we will now review whether it meets the requirements of the site plan. Daniel, Good evening. Do you expect the resubmit the site plan in the near future? Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle County psaternye@albem arle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2020 1:44 PM To: Daniel Hyer <dhver@line-erade.com>; Patricia Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> Subject: Fwd: Sheetz Easement Paperwork CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. fyi... entry easement for sheetz entrance. Thanks ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Demitra Hajimihalis <demitra@corecville.com> Date: Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 11:35 AM Subject: Sheetz Easement Paperwork To: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com>, Justin Ritter Ritter Law <jr@ritterlawpllc.com> Happy Monday! see attached. J_: 0 Patricia "Paty" Saternye From: Patricia Saternye Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 5:09 PM To: Daniel @ Line and Grade Cc: Andrew baldwin; Ryan Yauger, Adam Rogers Subject: RE: SDP2020-61 Airport Road Sheetz Final Site Plan Attachments: SDP2020-61 1st round comments 10-22-2020b.pdf Daniel, Good evening. Attached please find 1'round comments on SDP2020-61 Airport Road Sheetz Final Site Plan. Please let me know if you have any questions. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle County psaternye@al bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Adam Rogers <Adam.Rogers@bohlereng.com> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 3:30 PM To: Patricia Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org>; Daniel @ Line and Grade <dhyer@line-grade.com> Cc: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com>; Ryan Yauger <ryauger@bohlereng.com> Subject: RE: SDP2020-61 Airport Road Sheetz Final Site Plan CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Thanks Paty, ADA — American with Disabilities Act. Will revise street frontage and account for that area. Appreciate the comments ahead of time. Thanks again and be in touch, Adam From: Patricia Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 10:31 AM To: Adam Rogers <Adam.Rogers@bohlereng.com>; Daniel @ Line and Grade <dhver@line-grade.com> Cc: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com>; Ryan Yauger <ryauger@bohlereng.com> Subject: RE: SDP2020-61 Airport Road Sheetz Final Site Plan EXTERNAL Use caution with attachments and links. Mr. Rogers, Good morning. Thank you for that. Could you please clarify what "ADA" stands for? If it is landscape related, I'm thinking it was not the "ADA" I was assuming. Also, please note, in those cases you do not remove areas from the street frontage calculation. You instead just move items, such as trees, closer together in other locations so that you still meet the overall requirement without removing portions from the calculation. The stairwell and ramp are not areas that should be removed from the street frontage calculation. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle County psaternve@al bemarle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Adam Rogers <Adam.Rogers@bohlereng.com> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 9:51 AM To: Daniel @ Line and Grade <dhyer@line-grade.com>; Patricia Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> Cc: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com>; Ryan Yauger <ryauger@bohlereng.com> Subject: RE: SDP2020-61 Airport Road Sheetz Final Site Plan CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Morning all, Paty - the highlighted area of the proposed sidewalk/ramp connection, in addition to the "entry" segment (not highlighted), are to note which portions were withheld from calculating the length of Airport Rd, used to quantify the Street Frontage for LA requirements. (as those areas cannot be physically planted with street trees) Let me know If you have any questions of course, thanks again, Adam Rogers Sr. Landscape Architect 28 Blackwell Park Lane, Suite 201 Warrenton, VA 20186 o 540-349-4500 / adam.rogers@bohlereng.com Check out our new website BOHLER# From: Daniel @ Line and Grade <dhver@line-grade.com> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 9:29 AM To: Patricia Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> Cc: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com>; Adam Rogers <Adam.Rogers@bohlereng.com>; Ryan Yauger <ryauger@ boh lereng.com> Subject: Re: SDP2020-61 Airport Road Sheetz Final Site Plan EXTERNAL Use caution with attachments and links. Paty, I cannot answer that. But I'm cc-ing the landscape architect (Adam Rogers from Bohler) hoping he can provide some clarity as that label is on the LA sheet. Adam: see attached document from Paty and inquiry in email thread below. thanks, DANIEL LAYER, PE 434.962.2430 dhverAline-erade.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-arade.00m On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 9:19 AM Patricia Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> wrote: Daniel, Good morning. I'm finalizing the comments on SDP2020-61 Airport Road Sheetz Final Site Plan, but I have a question come up that I hoped you could answer for me. Could you please clarify the label I have highlighted on the attached sheet? It appears to be shown only on the Landscape Plan Sheet, and I do not know how to interpret it or why it was placed on that sheet of the site plan. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Albemarle Coun psaternye@albem arle.org 434-296-5832 x3250 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228, Charlottesville, VA 22902 From: Daniel @ Line and Grade <dhver@line-arade.com> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 3:31 PM To: Patricia Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org> Cc: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com> Subject: Re: SDP2020-25 Airport Road Sheetz RE: Payment Submitted CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Patty, Sorry for a slow reply. I've been out in the field most of the day, today. Now I'm recovering from the heat and humidity. Thanks for taking the initiate to wrap this up. We appreciate that. At this point we are clear for FSP submission based on the conditions you wrote. Thankyou! DANIEL LAYER, PE 434.962.2430 dtiverAline-orade.com Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-amtle.com On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 10:52 AM Patricia Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org> wrote: Daniel, It is my understanding that I have the correct version of the Initial Site Plan. So, since you were not able to respond to my right away I moved forward with the updating and finalizing of the ISP review. Attached please find the ISP Approval with conditions letter. I've also attached the initial site plan with my stamp. Please let me know if you have any questions. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Community Development Albemarle County 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 434-296-5832 ext.3250 psaternve@albemarle.org www.albemarle.org From: Patricia Saternye <psaternye@albemarle.org> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 8:35 AM To: Daniel @ Line and Grade <dhver@line-grade.com> Cc: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com> Subject: SDP2020-25 Airport Road Sheetz RE: Payment Submitted Daniel, Good morning. First, I want to confirm that the fee has been processed. You have addressed that comment. Second, In looking back at the DRAFT comments, and in my notes from our meeting soon after you received the comments, I saw that you had stated that from my comments it appeared that I had not be reviewed the correct version of the landscape plan. Therefore, I want to update my landscape comments prior to finalizing the ISP approval with conditions. QUESTION. Could you please confirm that the attached landscape plan was the one that was slip sheeted" after the ISP submittal? (around 31181 think) Please note, any landscaping comments I have will be based on that slip sheeted version (approximately 3/18/2020). Any versions you have submitted to the ARB since 5/7/2020, when my DRAFT comments were provided, is not be part of this ISP review. Any of those changes will be reviewed during the final site plan process. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Community Development Albemarle County 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 434-296-5832 ext.3250 psaternye@albemarle.org www.albemarle.org From: Patricia Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.ore> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 20201:57 PM To: Daniel @ Line and Grade <dhver@line-srade.com> Cc: Andrew baldwin <andrew@corecville.com> Subject: RE: Payment Submitted Daniel, Good afternoon. Thank you for the receipt. QUESTION: Did you forward it to the CDD Front Desk/intake staff as specified in my response to you? They need to process the payment and add it to our County View project management system. Be well, Paty Saternye Senior Planner Community Development Albemarle County 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 434-296-5832 ext.3250 psaternve@albemarle.org www.albemarle.org From: Daniel @ Line and Grade <dhver@line-erade.com> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 202011:59 AM To: Patricia Saternye <psaternve@albemarle.org>; Andrew baldwin <andrew(o)corecville.com> Subject: Fwd: Payment Submitted CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Paty, Please refer to email below and receipt attached for the $435 payment. Let me know if you need anything else thanks, DANIEL HYER, PE 434.962.2430 dhver0line-tirade. corn Line and Grade Adaptive. Responsive. Resilient. line-arade.com ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Albemarle County- VA - Tax <no-reply@sturaiswebservices.com> Date: Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 11:56 AM Subject: Payment Submitted To: <dhver@line-grade.com> PAYMENT SUBMITTED! Transaction ID 2XA67079KL067743P Total Paid $446.46 Item Amount Item Number: F2D6E8 $435.00 Type: Community Development Other Notes: Notice Fee for Airport Road Sheetz Project SDP202000025 - Initial Site Plan Comment from Paty Sate Transaction Fee $11.46 Total $446.46 This email has been sent to you by Albemarle County - VA - Tax (or its subsidiary). Click here to unsubscribe. You will stop receiving any a -mails including bill notifications and payment receipts. 10 L I N E + G R A D E C I V IL E N G IN E E R I N G SUBMISSION COVER LETTER TO: Albemarle County Department of Community Development 401 Ridge Street Charlottesville, VA 2290 FROM: Daniel C. Hyer, PE Line and Grade I Engineer of Record DATE: September 9, 2020 RE: Airport Road Sheetz Final Site Plan County of Albemarle, Virginia On behalf of Airport Auto Investments, LLC, we resubmit the above referenced Final Site Plan for review. Please find the following documentation attached: 01— Final Site Plan Checklist 01— Final Site Plan Application 01—Application Fee Receipt ($1,613) + Fire Rescue ($100) = $1,713 01— Comment Response Letter 02 — Full Size Plans A digital copy of these documents was submitted via the Web Application Portal. Daniel Hyer dhyer@line-grade.com 434-962-2430 LINE GRADE CIVIL ENGINEERING 1134' St. NE; STE 100 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 TEL: (434) 262-0169 LINE-GRADE.COM