HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201900100 Review Comments 2019-10-09 Brent Nelson
From: Margaret Maliszewski
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2019 1:33 PM
To: Jonathan Showalter; Steve Mundt
Cc: Tim Padalino; Brent Nelson
Subject: Scottsville Elementary Initial Plan -ARB review
Attachments: action letter.pdf
Steve and Jonathan,
As you know,the ARB review of the Scottsville Elementary School addition is being reviewed by staff and Brent Nelson
has previously forwarded you comments regarding required revisions. Because the site plan was submitted as an Initial
Plan, I have reformatted Brent's earlier comments into the standard ARB initial plan comment form.That letter is
attached. Nothing has changed since Brent's review; I've just reformatted for the Initial Plan file.
If you have questions, please let me know.
Thanks.
Margaret
Margaret Maliszewski,Chief of Planning/Resource Management
Albemarle County Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville,VA 22902
434-296-5832 x3276
mmaliszewski@albemarle.org
1
��O�
�rri411I11
7411 2-'fag
0:47
CirnA
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,North Wing
Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596
Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126
October 8,2019
Jonathan Showalter _
Timmons
608 Preston Ave., Suite 200
Charlottesville,VA 22902
RE:ARB-2019-106: Scottsville Elementary School Addition Initial Plan(130000000025P0)
Dear Applicant,
We have reviewed the above-noted application for conformity with Entrance Corridor guidelines and have forwarded the
following recommendations to the Agent for the Site Review Committee:
Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per§ 18-30.6.4(2),(3)and(5):
A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final siteplan approval.
1. Revise Sheet E3 Exterior Elevations to include the 5 proposed building materials shown on the materials board
submitted with this application.
2. Revise Sheet Dl Electrical Site Plan to:
a. Indicate the lumens value for each proposed fixture.
b. Indicate the mounting height for the wall-mount fixture.
c. Indicate the fixture tilt for each proposed fixture.Fixtures emitting 3,000 or more lumens shall have a zero-
degree tilt.
d. Indicate the lighting maintenance factor(LLF). An LLF of 1 is required by ordinance.
3. Revise Sheet D4 Electrical Site Plan—Photometrics to:
a. Show side,front and rear property lines. Add additional footcandle values to demonstrate that lighting
values do not exceed 0.5 footcandles at the property lines as required by ordinance.
b. Include the standard lighting note:Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more
initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from
adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires
onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one-half
footcandle.
wY
4. The two(2)light pole-mount fixture is Iabeled as LED-A in the Lighting Fixture Schedule(Sheet Dl Electrical r�
Site Plan)and as LED-B on the Electrical Site Plan.Revise the drawings to correct this discrepancy.
5. Sheet C9 Landscape Notes and Details indicates one(1)proposed large shade tree and 6 existing large shade trees
along the Entrance Corridor road. Revise drawings to show location of these existing and proposed Entrance
Corridor trees.
6. Add a latest revision date to all revised sheets.
1Y
Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines:
None.
Regarding recommended conditions of initial plan approval:
Prior to Initial Plan approval
None.
Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit:
None.
If you have any questions about this action,please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
716110/1)11-1-141".4'
Margaret Maliszewski
Chief of Planning/R.esource Management
434-296-5832 x3276
mmaliszewski®albemarle.org
cc: File
ii
tt