HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB202000069 Minutes 2021-01-04 v
<,
44-of A44 1 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
As' •� Department of Community Development
C.)I"'
&t_l• ill 401 McIntire Road,North Wing
�Ra�5"`GIN�'" Charlottesville,Virginia 22902
434-296-5832
ALBEMARLE COUNTY ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
FINAL Agenda for January 4, 2021
ALBEMARLE COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING
1:00 PM - VIRTUAL MEETING
NOTE: This meeting is being held pursuant to and in compliance with Ordinance No.20-A(16),An Ordinance to
Ensure the Continuity of Government During the COVID-19 Disaster The opportunities for the public to access and
participate in the electronic meeting are posted on the Albemarle County website on the Albemarle County calendar.
Participation will include the opportunity to comment on those matters for which comments from the public will be
received.
1. Call to order
2. Establish a Quorum
3. Annual Meeting
a. Chairperson and Vice Chairperson: Election
b. Rules of Procedure: Adopt
c 2021 Submittal and Meeting Schedule: Adopt
4. Disclosures
5. Public Comment
6. Consent Agenda—None
7. Work Session—None
8. Regular Review Items
a. ARB-2020-125: Scott's Ivy Exxon
Staff: Khris Taggart
b. ARB-2020-127: Wawa at Proffit Road Amendment
Staff: Khris Taggart
9. Other Business
a. ARB-2020-69: Sleep Number: Proposal to revise matenals
b. EC Arterials: Update
c EC Guidelines Discussion: Route 250 West
d. Approval of Minutes: December 21,2020
e. Next ARB Meeting: January 19, 2021,TUESDAY, 1:00 PM-VIRTUAL MEETING
Consent Agenda
NOTES REGARDING PUBLIC MEETINGS
1 Each applicant is allowed to make a single presentation not exceeding 15 minutes in length.The applicant may divide the 15-minute allotment among
various presenters,but the total presentation time will not exceed 15 minutes.
2. Each member of the general public who wishes to speak on a matter shall be allowed one appearance not to exceed 3 minutes.
3. Any person aggrieved by any decision of the Architectural Review Board may demand a review of the application by the Board of Supervisors.Such
demand shall be made by filing a request therefore in writing with the clerk of the Board of Supervisors within ten calendar days of the date of such
decision.For additional information see section 30.6.8 of the Zoning Ordinance.
NOTES REGARDING ARB ACTIONS
1 Certificates of Appropriateness are valid for the same period that the corresponding site plan is valid.If there is no site plan required for the proposed
work,the Certificate of Appropriateness is valid for 3 years.Applicants requesting an extension of the period of validity must do so in writing.The
letter must be received by the Director of Planning prior to the expiration date.
1
9. Other Business:
a. cARBr2020_69 Sleep-Number Proposal to revise materials
Proposal: To revise the metal panels to Master Wall stucco panels with the same color and
joint pattern.
Staff Contact: Margaret Maliszewski
Representatives for the project: Mark Kestner, Caleb Snyder
Staff summarized the applicant's request in a brief PowerPoint presentation and noted that the
request was not consistent with the guidelines or past practice. Mr. Missel asked for further
clarification on the proposed change and staff showed additional images highlighting the areas
of the building that were originally proposed as metal,which the applicant proposed to change
to stucco. Mark Kestner discussed pricing issues,the goal of keeping the building massing and
overall architectural intent, and the combination of materials. Board members asked the
applicant about making the material change in less visible areas,the material for the underside
of the canopies (Hardi) and noted the importance of precedent and balancing budget with
aesthetics. Board members noted that the face of the canopy is an odd location for stucco and
asked if the horizontal bands could be a different material than the vertical panels. They
suggested replacing the high cost material under the canopy and increasing the quality material
on the vertical surfaces. Mr. Snyder clarified that the horizontal band was 10" of stucco and 6"
of bronze flashing. Mr. Van Der Werf suggested that the applicant retain more metal or other
more friend material at the corner and horizontal elements. Mr. Kestner pointed out that there
would be two textures for the stucco—a rough texture in tan and a fine sand texture in blue. He
stated that stucco is a reasonably long-lasting material if applied and flashed correctly. ARB
members noted the need for additional information confirming the lifetime of the proposed
stucco; asked if the current design was proposed originally, would it have been approved;
suggested that stucco was acceptable on vertical elements but not horizontal ones; requested
stucco details; and confirmed that maintaining the joint pattern was appropriate.
Motion: Mr. Missel moved to provide the following comments for the applicant's next
submittal,which can be reviewed in a work session:
1. Consider further adjustments in the blend of materials to retain more metal or
incorporate another more refined material at the corner and at the horizontal elements,
and possibly some of the vertical elements.
2. Provide stucco details showing how the stucco will be a long-lasting material.
3. Accurate color renderings showing views from the EC street would be helpful.
Mr. Stoner seconded the motion.
The motion was carried by a vote of 4:0. (Henningsen abstained)
Albemarle County Architectural Review Board
Action Memo MinutesfJanuai4.20201J
6