Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201800017 Study Major Amendment, Final Site Plan 2018-05-03 I Soils Report For Keswick Hall Central Energy Plan Demo & Renovation-Major Amendment Tax Map ID: 080000000008Z0; 08000000000900 Item Number: SDP201800017 Prepared: May 3, 2018 10Augamiti Thomas Jefferson Soil & Water Conservation District "To exercise leadership in promoting natural resource protection. " 706 Forest Street, Suite G Charlottesville, Virginia 22903 Phone: (434) 975-0224 Soil Map—Albemarle County,Virginia (Keswick Hall energy) i. 730803 731030 731200 731400 731603 731630 l32U1J 732200 732433 38°1'23"N 1 • • 38°1'23"N I 1 'a/ ' 411 51C1661e ,5413 g :.•-"' SO,C;�S1p g �/ 25B ' j . 8OB 46B OB \\--*.-".."4'<i A� i _ ; 62 $ 51'C 51B Al 'I 626Jg _ 8�d :if 511D w 62 � 51C \ IA`\•� ' ' 468 51 B•�1 51C 466<, g 62By 51B ,,.62-rag, 51 h. fir:_ a 46B 51 C . a °` t`` * ` . �62B: ' 51B ,. g ,� +�. 9wBs51!B 4 • 5.1 C •' , `., 62B .62B 62B "„r 51` q. 51,Be "c,, 626' 16 t r-iL . ., . • 1. g /S�C V \ . 511B' V • -� iv51D; /51Ct. F ~is- Ilg 516 ��t \ 38°0 6"N 38°3'6"N 730800 731000 731230 731400 731603 731830 732C 0 732203 732403 3 3 to Map Scale.1.11,500 rf punted on A portrait(8.5'x 11")Meet Meters N o 160 300 600 900 A Feet 3 5� 2333 3� Map projection•Web Mercator,3ao Corner coordinates.WGS84 Edge tics.UTM Zone 17N WGS84 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Soil Map—Albemarle County,Virginia (Keswick Hall energy) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest(AOI) ig Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at L Area of Interest(AOI) ® Stony Spot 1 15,800. Soils Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map Li Soil Map Unit Polygons 03 Very Stony Spot measurements Wet Spot Source of Map Natural Resources Conservation Service ,.y Soil Map Unit Lines Web Soil Survey URL Other • Soil Map Unit Points Coordinate System Web Mercator(EPSG 3857) Special Line Features Special Point Features Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator (2) Blowout Water Features projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts Streams and Canals distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the Borrow Pit Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more ClaySpot Transportation accurate calculations of distance or area are required. ++4 Rails Closed Depression This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as Interstate Highways of the version date(s)listed below X Gravel Pit ,.,„0 US Routes Soil Survey Area Albemarle County,Virginia Gravelly Spot Major Roads Survey Area Data Version 11,Oct 11,2017 O Landfill Local Roads Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales A. Lava Flow 1 50,000 or larger !t Background Marsh or swamp Aerial Photography Date(s)aerial images were photographed Apr 22,2015—Mar 10,2017 • Mine or Quarry The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were o Miscellaneous Water compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor Q Perennial Water shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident Rock Outcrop .+.. Saline Spot Sandy Spot • Severely Eroded Spot * Sinkhole t Slide or Slip • Sodic Spot USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 • Soil Map—Albemarle County,Virginia Keswick Hall energy Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 16 Chewada silt loam 9 8 5 6% 25B Dyke silt loam,2 to 7 percent 7 1 4 0% slopes 46B Lignum silt loam,2 to 7 11 3 6 4% percent slopes 51B Manteo channery silt loam,2 38 0 21 6% to 7 percent slopes 51C Manteo channery silt loam,7 52.7 29.9% to 15 percent slopes 51D Manteo channery silt loam, 15 10 1 5.7% to 25 percent slopes 58B Myersville silt loam,2 to 7 0.4 0 2% percent slopes 62B Nason silt loam,2 to 7 percent 7 8 4 4% slopes 77 Riverview-Chewada complex 15 8 9 0% 80B Tatum silt loam,2 to 7 percent 9 7 5 5% slopes 80C Tatum silt loam,7 to 15 3.7 2.1% percent slopes 968 Worsham loam,2 to 7 percent 6 5 3 7% slopes W Water 3.0 1.7% Totals for Area of Interest 175.9 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 rard Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Map Unit Description(Brief,Generated)---Albemarle County,Virginia Keswick Hall energy Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area The map unit descriptions in this report, along with the maps. provide information on the composition of map units and properties of their components. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. The Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) report displays a generated description of the major soils that occur in a map unit Descriptions of non-soil (miscellaneous areas) and minor map unit components are not included This description is generated from the underlying soil attribute data. Additional information about the map units described in this report is available in other Soil Data Mart reports, which give properties of the soils and the limitations, capabilities, and potentials for many uses Also, the narratives that accompany the Soil Data Mart reports define some of the properties included in the map unit descriptions. Report—Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) Albemarle County, Virginia Map Unit: 16—Chewacla silt loam Component: Chewacla (85%) The Chewacla component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. This component is on flood plains, river valleys. The parent material consists of residuum weathered from granite and gneiss. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches The natural drainage class is somewhat poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is high. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is occasionally flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 12 inches during January, February, March, April, November, December Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3w. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. t Natural Resources Web Sod Survey 5/3/2018 00. Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 6 Map Unit Description(Brief,Generated)---Albemarle County,Virginia Keswick Hall energy Component: Wehadkee (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Wehadkee soil is a minor component. Map Unit: 25B—Dyke silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Component: Dyke (85%) The Dyke component makes up 85 percent of the map unit Slopes are 2 to 7 percent. This component is on fans, mountains. The parent material consists of residuum weathered from greenstone. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is high. Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded It is not ponded There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map Unit: 46B—Lignum silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Component: Lignum (85%) The Lignum component makes up 85 percent of the map unit Slopes are 2 to 7 percent. This component is on piedmonts, hillslopes. The parent material consists of residuum weathered from serecite schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, paralithic, is 40 to 60 inches. The natural drainage class is moderately well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is low Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 21 inches during January, February, March, April, May, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e This soil does not meet hydric criteria Component: Worsham (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Worsham soil is a minor component. Map Unit: 51B—Manteo channery silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Component: Manteo (80%) ORA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 6 Map Unit Description(Brief,Generated)---Albemarle County,Virginia Keswick Hall energy The Manteo component makes up 80 percent of the map unit Slopes are 2 to 7 percent. This component is on uplands, interfluves The parent material consists of residuum weathered from serecite schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer. bedrock. lithic. is 15 to 20 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat excessively drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is very low Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded It is not ponded There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 4e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map Unit: 51C—Manteo channery silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Component: Manteo (80%) The Manteo component makes up 80 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 7 to 15 percent. This component is on uplands, interfluves. The parent material consists of residuum weathered from serecite schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, lithic, is 10 to 20 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat excessively drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is very low. Shrink-swell potential is low This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 6e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map Unit: 51 D—Manteo channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Component: Manteo (80%) The Manteo component makes up 80 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 15 to 25 percent. This component is on interfluves, uplands. The parent material consists of residuum weathered from serecite schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, lithic, is 10 to 20 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat excessively drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is very low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 7e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map Unit: 58B—Myersville silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Component: Myersville (80%) gi% Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 �i Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 6 Map Unit Description(Brief,Generated)---Albemarle County,Virginia Keswick Hall energy The Myersville component makes up 80 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 7 percent. This component is on interfluves. uplands, foothills The parent material consists of residuum weathered from greenstone. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, paralithic, is 40 to 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map Unit: 62B—Nason silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Component: Nason (80%) The Nason component makes up 80 percent of the map unit Slopes are 2 to 7 percent. This component is on uplands, interfluves. The parent material consists of residuum weathered from serecite schist Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, paralithic, is 40 to 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is moderate This soil is not flooded It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map Unit: 77—Riverview-Chewacla complex Component: Riverview(50%) The Riverview component makes up 50 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. This component is on river valleys, flood plains. The parent material consists of alluvium derived from igneous rock. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is occasionally flooded. It is not ponded.A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 48 inches during January, February, March, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2w. This soil does not meet hydric criteria Component: Chewacla (40%) ygLA Natural Resources Web Sod Survey 5/3/2018 gown Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 6 Map Unit Description(Brief,Generated)---Albemarle County,Virginia Keswick Hall energy The Chewacla component makes up 40 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. This component is on river valleys, flood plains. The parent material consists of alluvium derived from igneous rock Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat poorly drained Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is high. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is occasionally flooded It is not ponded A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 12 inches during January, February, March, April, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3w This soil does not meet hydric criteria Component: Wehadkee (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components The Wehadkee soil is a minor component Map Unit: 80B—Tatum silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Component: Tatum (80%) The Tatum component makes up 80 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 7 percent. This component is on interfluves, uplands. The parent material consists of residuum weathered from serecite schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, paralithic, is 40 to 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map Unit: 80C—Tatum silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Component: Tatum (80%) The Tatum component makes up 80 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 7 to 15 percent. This component is on interfluves, uplands. The parent material consists of residuum weathered from serecite schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, paralithic, is 40 to 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high.Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map Unit: 96B—Worsham loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Component: Worsham (75%) gip Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 6 Map Unit Description(Brief,Generated)---Albemarle County,Virginia Keswick Hall energy The Worsham component makes up 75 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 7 percent. This component is on uplands, drainageways The parent material consists of colluvium derived from igneous rock Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is poorly drained Water movement in the most restrictive layer is low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 6 inches during January, February, March, April, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 4w. This soil meets hydric criteria Map Unit: W—Water Component: Water(100%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components The Water is a miscellaneous area. Data Source Information Soil Survey Area. Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Area Data Version 11, Oct 11, 2017 I�SD_ Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 glom Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 6 of 6 Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping---Albemarle County, Keswick Hall energy Virginia Roads and Streets, Shallow Excavations, and Lawns and Landscaping Soil properties Influence the development of building sites, including the selection of the site, the design of the structure, construction, performance after construction, and maintenance This table shows the degree and kind of soil limitations that affect local roads and streets, shallow excavations, and lawns and landscaping. The ratings in the table are both verbal and numerical Rating class terms indicate the extent to which the soils are limited by all of the soil features that affect building site development. Not limited indicates that the soil has features that are very favorable for the specified use. Good performance and very low maintenance can be expected. Somewhat limited indicates that the soil has features that are moderately favorable for the specified use. The limitations can be overcome or minimized by special planning, design, or installation. Fair performance and moderate maintenance can be expected. Very limited indicates that the soil has one or more features that are unfavorable for the specified use. The limitations generally cannot be overcome without major soil reclamation, special design, or expensive installation procedures Poor performance and high maintenance can be expected Numerical ratings in the table indicate the severity of individual limitations The ratings are shown as decimal fractions ranging from 0.01 to 1.00. They indicate gradations between the point at which a soil feature has the greatest negative impact on the use (1.00) and the point at which the soil feature is not a limitation (0 00) Local roads and streets have an all-weather surface and carry automobile and light truck traffic all year. They have a subgrade of cut or fill soil material, a base of gravel, crushed rock, or soil material stabilized by lime or cement; and a surface of flexible material (asphalt), rigid material (concrete), or gravel with a binder. The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect the ease of excavation and grading and the traffic-supporting capacity. The properties that affect the ease of excavation and grading are depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, hardness of bedrock or a cemented pan, depth to a water table, ponding, flooding, the amount of large stones, and slope. The properties that affect the traffic-supporting capacity are soil strength (as inferred from the AASHTO group index number), subsidence, linear extensibility (shrink-swell potential), the potential for frost action, depth to a water table, and ponding. Shallow excavations are trenches or holes dug to a maximum depth of 5 or 6 feet for graves, utility lines, open ditches, or other purposes. The ratings are based on the soil properties that influence the ease of digging and the resistance to sloughing. Depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, hardness of bedrock or a cemented pan, the amount of large stones, and dense layers influence the ease of digging, filling, and compacting. Depth to the seasonal high water table, flooding, and ponding may restrict the period when excavations can be made Slope influences the ease of using machinery. Soil texture, depth to the water table, and linear extensibility(shrink-swell potential) influence the resistance to sloughing. t1SDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 6 Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping---Albemarle County, Keswick Hall energy Virginia Lawns and landscaping require soils on which turf and ornamental trees and shrubs can be established and maintained. Irrigation is not considered in the ratings. The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect plant growth and trafficability after vegetation is established The properties that affect plant growth are reaction, depth to a water table, ponding, depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, the available water capacity in the upper 40 inches, the content of salts, sodium, or calcium carbonate, and sulfidic materials. The properties that affect trafficability are flooding, depth to a water table, ponding, slope, stoniness, and the amount of sand, clay, or organic matter in the surface layer. Information in this table is intended for land use planning, for evaluating land use alternatives, and for planning site investigations prior to design and construction The information, however, has limitations For example, estimates and other data generally apply only to that part of the soil between the surface and a depth of 5 to 7 feet Because of the map scale, small areas of different soils may be included within the mapped areas of a specific soil. The information is not site specific and does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation of the soils or for testing and analysis by personnel experienced in the design and construction of engineering works. Government ordinances and regulations that restrict certain land uses or impose specific design criteria were not considered in preparing the information in this table Local ordinances and regulations should be considered in planning, in site selection, and in design. Report—Roads and Streets, Shallow Excavations, and Lawns and Landscaping [Onsite investigation may be needed to validate the interpretations in this table and to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site The numbers in the value columns range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value, the greater the potential limitation. The table shows only the top five limitations for any given soil. The soil may have additional limitations] Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping—Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol and soil Pct.of Lawns and landscaping Local roads and streets Shallow excavations name map unit Rating class and Value Rating class and Value Rating class and Value limiting features limiting features limiting features 16—Chewacla silt loam Chewacla 85 Somewhat limited Very limited Very limited Depth to saturated 0 99 Flooding 1 00 Depth to saturated 1 00 zone zone Flooding 0 60 Low strength 1 00 Flooding 0.60 Low exchange 0.50 Depth to saturated 0.99 Dusty 0 08 capacity zone Dusty 0 08 Unstable excavation 0 01 walls USDA_ Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 r Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 6 Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping---Albemarle County, Keswick Hall energy Virginia Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping—Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol and soil Pct.of Lawns and landscaping Local roads and streets Shallow excavations name map unit Rating class and Value Rating class and Value Rating class and Value limiting features limiting features limiting features 25B—Dyke silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Dyke 85 Somewhat limited Very limited Somewhat limited Low exchange 0 50 Low strength 1 00 Too clayey 0 72 capacity Dusty 0 08 Frost action 0.50 Dusty 0.08 Shrink-swell 0.50 Unstable excavation 0.01 walls 46B—Lignum silt loam,2 to 7 percent slopes Lignum 85 Somewhat limited Very limited Very limited Low exchange 0 50 Low strength 1 00 Depth to saturated 1 00 capacity zone Depth to saturated 0 48 Depth to saturated 0 48 Dusty 0 07 zone zone Dusty 0 07 Shrink-swell 0 40 Unstable excavation 0 01 walls 51 B—Manteo channery silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Manteo 80 Very limited Very limited Very limited Depth to bedrock 1 00 Depth to hard bedrock 1 00 Depth to hard bedrock 1 00 Droughty 0 99 Dusty 0.07 Low exchange 0.75 Unstable excavation 0.01 capacity walls Dusty 0.07 Large stones content 0 03 51 C—Manteo channery silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Manteo 80 Very limited Very limited Very limited Depth to bedrock 1 00 Depth to hard bedrock 1 00 Depth to hard bedrock 1 00 Droughty 0 99 Slope 0 37 Slope 0 37 Low exchange 0 75 Dusty 0.07 capacity Slope 0 37 Unstable excavation 0 01 walls Dusty 0.07 VIA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 011. Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 6 Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping--Albemarle County, Keswick Hall energy Virginia Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping—Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol and soil Pct.of Lawns and landscaping Local roads and streets Shallow excavations name map unit Rating class and Value Rating class and Value Rating class and Value limiting features limiting features limiting features 51D—Manteo channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Manteo 80 Very limited Very limited Very limited Slope 1.00 Depth to hard bedrock 1 00 Depth to hard bedrock 1.00 Depth to bedrock 1 00 Slope 1 00 Slope 1.00 Droughty 0 99 Dusty 0 07 Low exchange 0 75 Unstable excavation 0 01 capacity walls Dusty 0.07 58B—Myersville silt loam,2 to 7 percent slopes Myersville 80 Somewhat limited Very limited Somewhat limited Low exchange 0 75 Low strength 1.00 Dusty 0 07 capacity Dusty 0.07 Frost action 0 50 Unstable excavation 0 01 walls 62B—Nason silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Nason 80 Somewhat limited Very limited Somewhat limited Low exchange 0.75 Low strength 1 00 Dusty 0.08 capacity Dusty 0 08 Shnnk-swell 0.47 Unstable excavation 0 01 walls rNatural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 6 Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping--Albemarle County. Keswick Hall energy Virginia Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping—Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol and soil Pct.of Lawns and landscaping Local roads and streets Shallow excavations name map unit Rating class and Value Rating class and Value Rating class and Value limiting features limiting features limiting features 77—Riverview- Chewacla complex Riverview 50 Somewhat limited Very limited Somewhat limited Low exchange 0 75 Flooding 1.00 Depth to saturated 0.61 capacity zone Flooding 0.60 Low strength 0 11 Flooding 0 60 Dusty 0 06 Dusty 0 06 Unstable excavation 0 01 walls Chewada 40 Somewhat limited Very limited Very limited Depth to saturated 0.99 Flooding 1 00 Depth to saturated 1.00 zone zone Flooding 0.60 Low strength 1.00 Flooding 0.60 Low exchange 0.50 Depth to saturated 0.99 Dusty 0.08 capacity zone Dusty 0.08 Unstable excavation 0 01 walls ----------------- 80B—Tatum silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Tatum 80 Somewhat limited Very limited Somewhat limited Low exchange 0.75 Low strength 1.00 Dusty 0 08 capacity Dusty 0 08 Shnnk-swell 0 50 Too dayey 0 05 Unstable excavation 0 01 walls 80C—Tatum silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Tatum 80 Somewhat limited Very limited Somewhat limited Low exchange 0.75 Low strength 1.00 Slope 0.37 capacity Slope 0 37 Shnnk-swell 0 50 Dusty 0 08 Dusty 0 08 Slope 0 37 Too dayey 0 05 Unstable excavation 0 01 walls USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 ;la. Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 6 Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping--Albemarle County, Keswick Hall energy Virginia Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping—Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol and soil Pct.of Lawns and landscaping Local roads and streets Shallow excavations name map unit Rating class and Value Rating class and Value Rating class and Value limiting features limiting features limiting features 96B—Worsham loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Worsham 75 Very limited Very limited Very limited Depth to saturated 1 00 Depth to saturated 1 00 Depth to saturated 1 00 zone zone zone Low exchange 0 75 Low strength 1 00 Dusty 0 05 capacity Dusty 0.05 Shnnk-swell 0 50 Too clayey 0 03 Unstable excavation 0 01 walls W—Water Water 100 Not rated Not rated Not rated Data Source Information Soil Survey Area. Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Area Data: Version 11, Oct 11, 2017 U,SDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 6 of 6 • Soil Features---Albemarle County,Virginia Keswick Hall energy Soil Features This table gives estimates of various soil features. The estimates are used in land use planning that involves engineering considerations. A restrictive layer is a nearly continuous layer that has one or more physical, chemical, or thermal properties that significantly impede the movement of water and air through the soil or that restrict roots or otherwise provide an unfavorable root environment. Examples are bedrock, cemented layers, dense layers, and frozen layers. The table indicates the hardness and thickness of the restrictive layer, both of which significantly affect the ease of excavation. Depth to top is the vertical distance from the soil surface to the upper boundary of the restrictive layer. Subsidence is the settlement of organic soils or of saturated mineral soils of very low density. Subsidence generally results from either desiccation and shrinkage, or oxidation of organic material, or both, following drainage. Subsidence takes place gradually, usually over a period of several years. The table shows the expected initial subsidence, which usually is a result of drainage, and total subsidence, which results from a combination of factors. Potential for frost action is the likelihood of upward or lateral expansion of the soil caused by the formation of segregated ice lenses (frost heave) and the subsequent collapse of the soil and loss of strength on thawing. Frost action occurs when moisture moves into the freezing zone of the soil. Temperature, texture, density, saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat), content of organic matter, and depth to the water table are the most important factors considered in evaluating the potential for frost action. It is assumed that the soil is not insulated by vegetation or snow and is not artificially drained. Silty and highly structured, clayey soils that have a high water table in winter are the most susceptible to frost action. Well drained, very gravelly, or very sandy soils are the least susceptible. Frost heave and low soil strength during thawing cause damage to pavements and other rigid structures. Risk of corrosion pertains to potential soil-induced electrochemical or chemical action that corrodes or weakens uncoated steel or concrete. The rate of corrosion of uncoated steel is related to such factors as soil moisture, particle- size distribution, acidity, and electrical conductivity of the soil. The rate of corrosion of concrete is based mainly on the sulfate and sodium content, texture, moisture content, and acidity of the soil. Special site examination and design may be needed if the combination of factors results in a severe hazard of corrosion. The steel or concrete in installations that intersect soil boundaries or soil layers is more susceptible to corrosion than the steel or concrete in installations that are entirely within one kind of soil or within one soil layer. For uncoated steel, the risk of corrosion, expressed as low, moderate, or high, is based on soil drainage class, total acidity, electrical resistivity near field capacity, and electrical conductivity of the saturation extract. For concrete, the risk of corrosion also is expressed as low, moderate, or high It is based on soil texture, acidity, and amount of sulfates in the saturation extract. QA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4 Soil Features---Albemarle County,Virginia Keswick Hall energy Report—Soil Features Soil Features—Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol and Restrictive Layer Subsidence Potential for frost Risk of corrosion soil name action Kind Depth to Thickness Hardness Initial Total Uncoated steel Concrete top Low-RV- Range Low- Low- High High High In In In In 16—Chewacla silt loam Chewacla — — — — None High Moderate 25B—Dyke silt loam,2 to 7 percent slopes Dyke — — — — Moderate High Moderate 46B—Lignum silt loam,2 to 7 percent slopes Lignum Paralithic bedrock 40- — Moderately — — None High Moderate 58-60 cemented 51 B—Manteo channery silt loam,2 to 7 percent slopes Manteo Lithic bedrock 15- — Indurated — — None Moderate High 18-20 51 C—Manteo channery silt loam,7 to 15 percent slopes Manteo Lithic bedrock 10- — Indurated — — None Moderate High 18-20 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 MI Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4 Soil Features---Albemarle County,Virginia Keswick Hall energy ' Soil Features—Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol and Restrictive Layer Subsidence Potential for frost Risk of corrosion soil name action Kind Depth to Thickness Hardness Initial Total Uncoated steel Concrete top Low-RV- Range Low- Low- High High High 51 D—Manteo channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Manteo Lithic bedrock 10- — Indurated — — None Moderate High 18-20 5813--Myersvdle silt loam,2 to 7 percent slopes Myersville Paralithic bedrock 40- — Moderately — — Moderate Low Moderate 44-60 cemented 62B—Nason silt loam,2 to 7 percent slopes Nason Paralithic bedrock 40- — Moderately — — None Moderate Moderate 50-60 cemented 77—Riverview- Chewacla complex Riverview — — — — None High Moderate • Chewada — — — — None High Moderate 80B—Tatum silt loam,2 to 7 percent slopes Tatum Paralithic bedrock 40- — Moderately — — None High Moderate 51-60 cemented 80C—Tatum silt loam,7 to 15 percent slopes Tatum Paralithic bedrock 40- — Moderately — — None High Moderate 50-60 cemented mgNatural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 Soil Features---Albemarle County,Virginia Keswick Hall energy Soil Features-Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol and Restrictive Layer Subsidence Potential for frost Risk of corrosion soil name action Kind Depth to Thickness Hardness Initial Total Uncoated steel Concrete top Low-RV- Range Low- Low- High High High 96B—Worsham loam,2 to 7 percent slopes Worsham — — — — None High Moderate W—Water Water — — — — Data Source Information Soil Survey Area Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Area Data. Version 11, Oct 11, 2017 ill% Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4 Physical Soil Properties---Albemarle County,Virginia Keswick Hall energy Physical Soil Properties This table shows estimates of some physical characteristics and features that affect soil behavior These estimates are given for the layers of each soil in the survey area The estimates are based on field observations and on test data for these and similar soils Depth to the upper and lower boundaries of each layer is indicated. Particle size is the effective diameter of a soil particle as measured by sedimentation, sieving, or micrometric methods Particle sizes are expressed as classes with specific effective diameter class limits The broad classes are sand, silt, and clay, ranging from the larger to the smaller Sand as a soil separate consists of mineral soil particles that are 0.05 millimeter to 2 millimeters in diameter. In this table, the estimated sand content of each soil layer is given as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. Silt as a soil separate consists of mineral soil particles that are 0.002 to 0 05 millimeter in diameter. In this table, the estimated silt content of each soil layer is given as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. Clay as a soil separate consists of mineral soil particles that are less than 0.002 millimeter in diameter. In this table, the estimated clay content of each soil layer is given as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. The content of sand, silt, and clay affects the physical behavior of a soil. Particle size is important for engineering and agronomic interpretations, for determination of soil hydrologic qualities, and for soil classification. The amount and kind of clay affect the fertility and physical condition of the soil and the ability of the soil to adsorb cations and to retain moisture. They influence shrink-swell potential, saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat), plasticity, the ease of soil dispersion, and other soil properties The amount and kind of clay in a soil also affect tillage and earthmoving operations Moist bulk density is the weight of soil (ovendry) per unit volume. Volume is measured when the soil is at field moisture capacity, that is, the moisture content at 1/3-or 1/10-bar(33kPa or 10kPa) moisture tension. Weight is determined after the soil is dried at 105 degrees C. In the table, the estimated moist bulk density of each soil horizon is expressed in grams per cubic centimeter of soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. Bulk density data are used to compute linear extensibility, shrink-swell potential, available water capacity, total pore space, and other soil properties. The moist bulk density of a soil indicates the pore space available for water and roots. Depending on soil texture, a bulk density of more than 1.4 can restrict water storage and root penetration Moist bulk density is influenced by texture, kind of clay, content of organic matter, and soil structure. g LA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 sous Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 9 Physical Soil Properties---Albemarle County,Virginia Keswick Hall energy Saturated hydraulic conductivity(Ksat) refers to the ease with which pores in a saturated soil transmit water. The estimates in the table are expressed in terms of micrometers per second They are based on soil characteristics observed in the field, particularly structure, porosity, and texture. Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) is considered in the design of soil drainage systems and septic tank absorption fields. Available water capacity refers to the quantity of water that the soil is capable of storing for use by plants. The capacity for water storage is given in inches of water per inch of soil for each soil layer. The capacity varies, depending on soil properties that affect retention of water. The most important properties are the content of organic matter, soil texture, bulk density, and soil structure. Available water capacity is an important factor in the choice of plants or crops to be grown and in the design and management of irrigation systems Available water capacity is not an estimate of the quantity of water actually available to plants at any given time. Linear extensibility refers to the change in length of an unconfined clod as moisture content is decreased from a moist to a dry state. It is an expression of the volume change between the water content of the clod at 1/3-or 1/10-bar tension (33kPa or 10kPa tension) and oven dryness The volume change is reported in the table as percent change for the whole soil. The amount and type of clay minerals in the soil influence volume change Linear extensibility is used to determine the shrink-swell potential of soils The shrink-swell potential is low if the soil has a linear extensibility of less than 3 percent; moderate if 3 to 6 percent; high if 6 to 9 percent, and very high if more than 9 percent If the linear extensibility is more than 3, shrinking and swelling can cause damage to buildings, roads, and other structures and to plant roots. Special design commonly is needed. Organic matter is the plant and animal residue in the soil at various stages of decomposition. In this table, the estimated content of organic matter is expressed as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. The content of organic matter in a soil can be maintained by returning crop residue to the soil. Organic matter has a positive effect on available water capacity, water infiltration, soil organism activity, and filth. It is a source of nitrogen and other nutrients for crops and soil organisms. Erosion factors are shown in the table as the K factor(Kw and Kf) and the T factor. Erosion factor K indicates the susceptibility of a soil to sheet and rill erosion by water. Factor K is one of six factors used in the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) and the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE)to predict the average annual rate of soil loss by sheet and rill erosion in tons per acre per year. The estimates are based primarily on percentage of silt, sand, and organic matter and on soil structure and Ksat. Values of K range from 0.02 to 0.69. Other factors being equal, the higher the value, the more susceptible the soil is to sheet and rill erosion by water Erosion factor Kw indicates the erodibility of the whole soil. The estimates are modified by the presence of rock fragments Erosion factor Kf indicates the erodibility of the fine-earth fraction, or the material less than 2 millimeters in size. QA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 9 Physical Soil Properties---Albemarle County,Virginia Keswick Hall energy Erosion factor T is an estimate of the maximum average annual rate of soil erosion by wind and/or water that can occur without affecting crop productivity over a sustained period. The rate is in tons per acre per year. Wind erodibility groups are made up of soils that have similar properties affecting their susceptibility to wind erosion in cultivated areas The soils assigned to group 1 are the most susceptible to wind erosion, and those assigned to group 8 are the least susceptible The groups are described in the"National Soil Survey Handbook." Wind erodibility index is a numerical value indicating the susceptibility of soil to wind erosion, or the tons per acre per year that can be expected to be lost to wind erosion. There is a close correlation between wind erosion and the texture of the surface layer, the size and durability of surface clods, rock fragments, organic matter, and a calcareous reaction Soil moisture and frozen soil layers also influence wind erosion. Reference United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. (http.//soils.usda.gov) t)gpq Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 9 Physical Soil Properties---Albemarle County.Virginia Keswick Hall energy Report—Physical Soil Properties Three values are provided to identify the expected Low (L), Representative Value (R), and High (H). Physical Soil Properties-Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol Depth Sand Silt Clay Moist Saturated Available Linear Organic Erosion Wind Wind and soil name bulk hydraulic water extensibility matter factors erodibility erodibility density conductivity capacity group index Kw Kf T In ! Pct Pct Pct g/cc micro m/sec In/In Pct Pct 16—Chewacla silt loam Chewada 0-8 -22- -55- 10-23-35 1.30-1.45 4 00-9.00-14.00 0.15-0.20-0. 0.0-1.5-2 9 1.0-2.5- 32 32 5 6 48 -1 60 24 4 0 8-16 -19- -54- 18-27-35 1 30-1 40 4 00-9 00-14 00 0 15-0 20-0 0 0-1 5-2 9 0 5-1 3- 43 43 -1 50 24 2 0 16-26 -15- -57- 18-28-35 1.30-1.45 4.00-9.00-14.00 0.12-0.16-0. 0.0-1.5-2.9 0.5-1.3- 43 43 -1.60 20 2.0 26-40 -15- -57- 18-28-35 1 30-1 40 4.00-9.00-14.00 0.15-0.20-0. 0.0-1.5-2.9 0.5-1.3- .43 .43 -1 50 24 2.0 40-79 -20- -58- 10-23-35 1.30-1.45 4 00-9 00-14 00 0.15-0 20-0 0 0-1 5-2 9 0.5-1 3- 43 43 -1 60 24 2 0 25B—Dyke silt loam,2 to 7 percent slopes Dyke 0-8 -27- -54- 10-19-27 1 20-1 30 4 00-23 00-42 0 0 17-0 20-0 0 0-1 5-2.9 0 1-1 0- 37 37 5 5 56 -1 40 0 22 2 0 8-43 -18- -29- 35-53-70 1.25-1.40 4.00-9.00-14.00 0.14-0.17-0. 3 0-4 5-5 9 0 0-0 3- 17 17 -1.55 19 0 5 43-79 -30- -30- 27-40-50 1 25-1 40 4 00-9 00-14 00 0 06-0 09-0 3 0-4 5-5 9 0 0-0 3- 15 24 -1 55 12 0 5 iiiNatural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 9 Physical Soil Properties---Albemarle County.Virginia Keswick Hall energy Physical Soil Properties—Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol Depth Sand Silt Clay Moist Saturated Available Linear Organic Erosion Wind Wind and soil name bulk hydraulic water extensibility matter factors erodibility erodibility density conductivity capacity group index Kw Kf T In Pct Pct Pct g/cc micro m/sec ' In/In Pct Pct 46B—Lignum silt loam,2 to 7 percent slopes Lignum 0-9 -29- -53- 10-18-25 1 20-1 35 4 00-9 00-14 00 0 14-0 17-0 0 0-1 5-2 9 0 5-1 3- .49 49 4 5 56 -1.50 20 2.0 9-38 -16- -52- 27-32-55 1.25-1.40 0.01-0.21-0 42 0 10-0 14-0 3 0-4 5-5 9 0.0-0.3- .49 .49 -1.55 18 0.5 38-58 -17- -64- 12-20-27 1.25-1.40 1.40-2.70-4.00 0.10-0.14-0. 0.0-1.5-2.9 0.0-0 3- 24 55 -1 55 18 0 5 58-79 — — — — 0 00-7 00-14 00 — — — 51 B—Manteo channery silt loam,2 to 7 percent slopes Manteo 0-6 -29- -54- 7-17-27 1 25-1 40 14 00-28 00-42 0 10-0 13-0 0 0-1 5-2 9 0 5-1 3- 20 37 1 6 48 -1 55 00 16 2.0 6-18 -22- -55- 10-23-35 1.35-1.50 14.00-28.00-42. 0.07-0.11-0. 0.0-1.5-2.9 0.0-0.3- .10 .43 -1 65 00 14 0 5 — 18-79 — — — — 0 00-21 00-42 0 — — — 0 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 9 Physical Soil Properties---Albemarle County,Virginia Keswick Hall energy Physical Soil Properties—Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol Depth Sand Silt Clay Moist Saturated Available Linear Organic Erosion Wind Wind and soil name bulk hydraulic water extensibility matter factors erodibility erodibility density conductivity capacity group index Kw Kf T In Pct Pct Pct g/cc 1 micro m/sec In/In 1 Pct I Pct 51 C—Manteo channery silt loam,7 to 15 percent slopes Manteo 0-6 -29- -54- 7-17-27 1.25-1.40 14 00-28 00-42 0 10-0 13-0 0 0-1 5-2 9 0 5-1 3- 20 37 1 6 48 -1 55 00 16 2 0 6-18 -22- -55- 10-23-35 1.35-1.50 14.00-28 00-42 0.07-0.11-0. 0.0-1-5-2.9 0 0-0 3- 10 43 -1.65 00 14 0 5 18-79 — — — — 0 00-21 00-42 0 — — — 0 51 D—Manteo channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Manteo 0-6 -29- -54- 7-17-27 1 25-1.40 14.00-28.00-42. 0.10-0.13-0. 0.0-1.5-2.9 0 5-1 3- 20 37 1 6 48 -1.55 00 16 2.0 6-18 -22- -55- 10-23-35 1 35-1 50 14 00-28 00-42 0 07-0 11-0 0 0-1 5-2 9 0 0-0 3- 10 43 -1 65 00 14 0 5 18-79 — — — — 0.00-21.00-42.0 — — — 0 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 alli Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 6 of 9 Physical Soil Properties—Albemarle County,Virginia Keswick Hall energy • Physical Soil Properties—Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol Depth Sand Silt Clay Moist Saturated Available Linear Organic Erosion Wind Wind and soil name bulk hydraulic water extensibility matter factors erodibility erodibility density conductivity capacity group index Kw Kf T In Pct Pct Pct g/cc micro m/sec In/In Pct Pct 58B— Myersville silt loam,2 to 7 percent slopes Myersvdle 0-7 -31- -57- 5-13-20 1.20-1 35 14 00-28 00-42 0 14-0 17-0 0 0-1 5-2 9 1 0-2 0- 43 43 4 5 56 -1 50 00 20 3 0 7-28 -18- -50- 18-32-40 1 20-1 35 4 00-9 00-14 00 0 14-0 16-0 0 0-1 5-2 9 0 0-0 3- 37 .37 -150 18 05 28-44 -26- -53- 10-21-32 1 20-1 35 4 00-9 00-14 00 0 08-0 12-0 0 0-1.5-2.9 0.0-0.3- .43 43 -1 50 16 0 5 44-79 — — — — 0.00-7.00-14 00 — — — 62B—Mason silt loam,2 to 7 percent slopes Nason 0-8 -27- -54- 10-19-27 1 25-1 40 4 00-9.00-14.00 0.14-0.17-0. 0.0-1.5-2 9 1 0-2 0- 37 37 4 5 56 -1 55 20 3 0 8-39 -17- -51- 27-32-50 1 30-1 45 4 00-9 00-14 00 0 12-0 16-0 3 0-4 5-5 9 0 0-0 3- 37 37 -1 60 19 0.5 39-50 -29- -53- 10-18-25 1 25-1 40 4 00-9 00-14 00 015-0.18-0. 0.0-1 5-2 9 0.0-0.3- .24 .49 -1 55 20 0 5 50-79 — — — — 0.00-7.00-14 00 — — — USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 doll Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 7 of 9 Physical Soil Properties---Albemarle County,Virginia Keswick Hall energy Physical Soil Properties-Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol Depth Sand Silt Clay Moist Saturated Available Linear Organic Erosion Wind Wind and soil name bulk hydraulic water extensibility matter factors erodibility erodibility density conductivity capacity group index Kw Kf T In Pct Pct Pct g/cc micro m/sec In/In Pct Pct 77-Riverview- Chewacla complex Riverview 0-12 -43- -39- 10-19-27 1 30-1 45 4 00-9 00-14 00 0 16-0 20-0 0 0-1 5-2 9 0 5-1 3- 32 32 5 5 56 -1 60 24 2 0 12-35 -19- -54- 18-27-35 1.20-1 30 4 00-9 00-14.00 0.15-0.19-0 0 0-1 5-2 9 0 5-0 8- .43 .43 -1.40 22 1.0 35-79 -33- -56- 4-11-18 1 20-1 35 14 00-28 00-42 0 07-0 09-0 0 0-1 5-2 9 0 5-0 8- 49 49 -150 00 11 10 ii Chewada 0-8 -22- -55- 10-23-35 1.30-1.45 4 00-9.00-14.00 10.15-0.20-0. 0.0-1.5-2.9 r .32 .32 5 6 48 1.0-2.5- -1.60 24 4.0 8-16 -19- -54- 18-27-35 1.30-1.40 4.00-9.00-14.00 0.15-0.20-0. i 0.0-1.5-2 9 0.5-1 3- .43 43 -1.50 24 2.0 16-26 -15- -57- 18-28-35 1.30-1.45 4.00-9.00-14.00 0.12-0.16-0. 0.0-1.5-2.9 0.5-1.3- 43 .43 -1.60 20 2.0 26-40 -15- -57- 18-28-35 1 30-1.40 4.00-9 00-14.00 0 15-0 20-0. 0.0-1.5-2.9 0.5-1 3- .43 .43 -1.50 24 2.0 40-79 -22- -56- 10-23-35 1.30-1.45 4.00-9.00-14.00 0.15-0.20-0. 0.0-1.5-2.9 0.5-1.3- .43 .43 -1.60 24 2.0 80B-Tatum silt loam,2 to 7 percent slopes Tatum 0-6 -27- -54- 12-20-27 1.10-1.25 '4.00-9.00-14 00 0 16-0 18-0 0 0-1 5-2 9 0 5-1 3- 37 37 4 5 56 -1.40 20 2 0 6-42 -8- -49- 27-43-60 1 40-1 50 4 00-9 00-14 00 0.10-0 15-0 3 0-4 5-5 9 0 0-0 3- 28 28 -1 60 19 0 5 42-51 -20- -54- 12-26-40 1.40-1.50 4 00-9 00-14 00 0 10-0 15-0 3 0-4 5-5.9 0.0-0 3- 20 43 -1.60 19 0 5 51-79 - - - - 0 00-21 00-42.0 - - - 0 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 8 of 9 Physical Soil Properties---Albemarle County,Virginia Keswick Hall energy Physical Soil Properties—Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol Depth Sand Silt Clay Moist Saturated Available Linear Organic Erosion Wind Wind and soil name bulk hydraulic water extensibility matter factors erodibility erodibility density conductivity capacity group index Kw Kf T I In Pct Pct Pct g/cc micro m/sec In/In Pct Pct 80C—Tatum silt loam,7 to 15 percent slopes Tatum 0-6 -27- -54- 12-20-27 1 10-1 25 4 00-9 00-14 00 0 16-0 18-0 0 0-1 5-2 9 0.5-1.3- .37 .37 4 5 56 -1.40 20 2 0 6-42 -8- -49- 27-43-60 1.40-1.50 4.00-9.00-14.00 0.10-0.15-0. 3.0-4.5-5.9 0 0-0 3- 28 28 -1.60 19 0 5 42-51 -20- -54- 12-26-40 1.40-1.50 4.00-9.00-14.00 0.10-0.15-0. 3.0-4.5-5 9 0 0-0 3- 20 43 -1 60 19 0 5 51-79 — — — — 0 00-21 00-42 0 — — 0 96B—Worsham loam.2 to 7 percent slopes Worsham 0-9 -43- -40- 10-18-25 1 25-1 40 4 00-9 00-14 00 0 14-0 17-0 0 0-1 5-2 9 1.0-2.0- .37 .37 5 5 56 -1 55 20 3 0 9-54 -28- -29- 30-43-55 1.35-1.50 0.01-0.21-0.42 0.10-0.13-0. 3.0-4.5-5.9 0 0-0 3- 28 28 -1.65 16 0 5 54-79 -57- -18- 10-25-40 1.20-1.35 1.40-2.70-4 00 0 08-0 14-0 3.0-4 5-5 9 0 0-0 3- 24 24 -1 50 19 0.5 W—Water Water — — — — — — — — Data Source Information Soil Survey Area. Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Area Data. Version 11, Oct 11, 2017 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 9 of 9 Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping---Albemarle County, Keswick Hall energy Virginia Roads and Streets, Shallow Excavations, and Lawns and Landscaping Soil properties influence the development of building sites, including the selection of the site, the design of the structure. construction, performance after construction, and maintenance This table shows the degree and kind of soil limitations that affect local roads and streets, shallow excavations, and lawns and landscaping. The ratings in the table are both verbal and numerical. Rating class terms indicate the extent to which the soils are limited by all of the soil features that affect building site development. Not limited indicates that the soil has features that are very favorable for the specified use. Good performance and very low maintenance can be expected. Somewhat limited indicates that the soil has features that are moderately favorable for the specified use. The limitations can be overcome or minimized by special planning, design, or installation. Fair performance and moderate maintenance can be expected. Very limited indicates that the soil has one or more features that are unfavorable for the specified use. The limitations generally cannot be overcome without major soil reclamation, special design, or expensive installation procedures Poor performance and high maintenance can be expected Numerical ratings in the table indicate the severity of individual limitations. The ratings are shown as decimal fractions ranging from 0.01 to 1.00. They indicate gradations between the point at which a soil feature has the greatest negative impact on the use (1 00) and the point at which the soil feature is not a limitation (0 00). Local roads and streets have an all-weather surface and carry automobile and light truck traffic all year. They have a subgrade of cut or fill soil material, a base of gravel, crushed rock, or soil material stabilized by lime or cement, and a surface of flexible material (asphalt), rigid material (concrete), or gravel with a binder. The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect the ease of excavation and grading and the traffic-supporting capacity. The properties that affect the ease of excavation and grading are depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, hardness of bedrock or a cemented pan, depth to a water table, ponding, flooding, the amount of large stones, and slope. The properties that affect the traffic-supporting capacity are soil strength (as inferred from the AASHTO group index number), subsidence, linear extensibility (shrink-swell potential), the potential for frost action, depth to a water table, and ponding. Shallow excavations are trenches or holes dug to a maximum depth of 5 or 6 feet for graves, utility lines, open ditches, or other purposes. The ratings are based on the soil properties that influence the ease of digging and the resistance to sloughing Depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, hardness of bedrock or a cemented pan, the amount of large stones, and dense layers influence the ease of digging, filling, and compacting. Depth to the seasonal high water table, flooding, and ponding may restrict the period when excavations can be made. Slope influences the ease of using machinery. Soil texture, depth to the water table, and linear extensibility (shrink-swell potential) influence the resistance to sloughing. QA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 6 Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping---Albemarle County, Keswick Hall energy Virginia Lawns and landscaping require soils on which turf and ornamental trees and shrubs can be established and maintained. Irrigation is not considered in the ratings The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect plant growth and trafficability after vegetation is established. The properties that affect plant growth are reaction; depth to a water table, ponding, depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, the available water capacity in the upper 40 inches, the content of salts, sodium, or calcium carbonate; and sulfidic materials. The properties that affect trafficability are flooding, depth to a water table, ponding, slope, stoniness, and the amount of sand, clay, or organic matter in the surface layer. Information in this table is intended for land use planning, for evaluating land use alternatives, and for planning site investigations prior to design and construction The information, however, has limitations For example, estimates and other data generally apply only to that part of the soil between the surface and a depth of 5 to 7 feet. Because of the map scale, small areas of different soils may be included within the mapped areas of a specific soil. The information is not site specific and does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation of the soils or for testing and analysis by personnel experienced in the design and construction of engineering works. Government ordinances and regulations that restrict certain land uses or impose specific design criteria were not considered in preparing the information in this table. Local ordinances and regulations should be considered in planning, in site selection, and in design. Report—Roads and Streets, Shallow Excavations, and Lawns and Landscaping [Onsite investigation may be needed to validate the interpretations in this table and to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site The numbers in the value columns range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value, the greater the potential limitation. The table shows only the top five limitations for any given soil. The soil may have additional limitations] Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping—Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol and soil Pct.of Lawns and landscaping Local roads and streets Shallow excavations name map unit Rating class and Value Rating class and Value Rating class and Value limiting features limiting features limiting features 16—Chewacla silt loam Chewacla 85 Somewhat limited Very limited Very limited Depth to saturated 0.99 Flooding 1 00 Depth to saturated 1 00 zone zone Flooding 0 60 Low strength 1 00 Flooding 0.60 Low exchange 0.50 Depth to saturated 0.99 Dusty 0 08 capacity zone Dusty 0 08 Unstable excavation 0.01 walls 1 Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 r Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 6 • Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping--Albemarle County, Keswick Hall energy Virginia Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping—Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol and soil Pct.of Lawns and landscaping Local roads and streets Shallow excavations name map unit Rating class and Value Rating class and Value Rating class and Value limiting features limiting features limiting features 25B—Dyke silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Dyke 85 Somewhat limited Very limited Somewhat limited Low exchange 0 50 Low strength 1 00 Too clayey 0.72 capacity Dusty 0 08 Frost action 0 50 Dusty 0.08 Shnnk-swell 0.50 Unstable excavation 0.01 walls 46B—Lignum silt loam,2 to 7 percent slopes Lignum 85 Somewhat limited Very limited Very limited Low exchange 0 50 Low strength 1 00 Depth to saturated 1 00 capacity zone Depth to saturated 0 48 Depth to saturated 0 48 Dusty 0.07 zone zone Dusty 0.07 Shrink-swell 0 40 Unstable excavation 0 01 walls 51B—Manteo channery silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Manteo 80 Very limited Very limited Very limited Depth to bedrock 1 00 Depth to hard bedrock 1 00 Depth to hard bedrock 1 00 Droughty 0 99 Dusty 0.07 Low exchange 0 75 Unstable excavation 0.01 capacity walls Dusty 0 07 Large stones content 0.03 51C—Manteo channery silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Manteo 80 Very limited Very limited Very limited Depth to bedrock 1 00 Depth to hard bedrock 1 00 Depth to hard bedrock 1 00 Droughty 0 99 Slope 0.37 Slope 0 37 Low exchange 0 75 Dusty 0 07 capacity Slope 0.37 Unstable excavation 0 01 walls Dusty 0 07 Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 6 Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping--Albemarle County. Keswick Hall energy Virginia Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping—Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol and soil Pct.of Lawns and landscaping Local roads and streets Shallow excavations name map unit Rating class and Value Rating class and Value Rating class and Value limiting features limiting features limiting features 51D—Manteo channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Manteo 80 Very limited Very limited Very limited Slope 1 00 Depth to hard bedrock 1 00 Depth to hard bedrock 1 00 Depth to bedrock 1 00 Slope 1 00 Slope 1 1 00 Droughty 0.99 Dusty 0.07 Low exchange 0.75 Unstable excavation 0 01 capacity walls Dusty 0 07 58B—Myersville silt loam,2 to 7 percent slopes Myersville 80 Somewhat limited Very limited Somewhat limited Low exchange 0 75 Low strength 1 00 Dusty 0 07 capacity Dusty 0.07 Frost action 0 50 Unstable excavation 0 01 walls 62B—Nason silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Nason 80 Somewhat limited Very limited Somewhat limited Low exchange 0 75 Low strength 1.00 Dusty 0 08 capacity Dusty 0.08 Shnnk-swell 0 47 Unstable excavation 1 0 01 walls gaNatural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 6 Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping---Albemarle County. Keswick Hall energy Virginia Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping—Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol and soil Pct.of Lawns and landscaping Local roads and streets Shallow excavations name map unit Rating class and Value Rating class and Value Rating class and Value limiting features limiting features limiting features 77—Riverview- Chewacla complex Riverview 50 Somewhat limited Very limited Somewhat limited Low exchange 0 75 Flooding 1.00 Depth to saturated 0 61 capacity zone Flooding 0 60 Low strength 0 11 Flooding 0 60 Dusty 0 06 Dusty 0 06 Unstable excavation 0.01 walls Chewada 40 Somewhat limited Very limited Very limited Depth to saturated 0.99 Flooding 1.00 Depth to saturated 1.00 zone zone Flooding 0.60 Low strength 1.00 Flooding 0.60 Low exchange 0.50 Depth to saturated 0.99 Dusty 0.08 capacity zone Dusty 0.08 Unstable excavation 0.01 walls 80B—Tatum silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Tatum 80 Somewhat limited Very limited Somewhat limited Low exchange 0 75 Low strength 1 00 Dusty 0 08 capacity Dusty 0.08 Shnnk-swell 0.50 Too dayey 0 05 Unstable excavation 0 01 walls 80C—Tatum silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Tatum 80 Somewhat limited Very limited Somewhat limited Low exchange 0.75 Low strength 1.00 Slope 0 37 capacity Slope 0.37 Shnnk-swell 0.50 Dusty 0.08 Dusty 0 08 Slope 0.37 Too dayey 0.05 Unstable excavation 0 01 walls USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 6 Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping--Albemarle County, Keswick Hall energy Virginia Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping—Albemarle County,Virginia Map symbol and soil Pct.of Lawns and landscaping Local roads and streets Shallow excavations name map unit Rating class and Value Rating class and Value Rating class and Value limiting features limiting features limiting features 96B—Worsham loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Worsham 75 Very limited Very limited Very limited Depth to saturated 1 00 Depth to saturated 1.00 Depth to saturated 1 00 zone zone zone Low exchange 0.75 Low strength 1.00 Dusty 0 05 capacity Dusty 0 05 Shnnk-swell 0 50 Too dayey 0 03 Unstable excavation 0 01 walls W—Water Water 100 Not rated Not rated Not rated Data Source Information Soil Survey Area. Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Area Data Version 11, Oct 11, 2017 Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/3/2018 tom Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 6 of 6