The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP202000061 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2021-07-09Phone 434-296-5832 ,t OF AL O V � tc GrRGINyP County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA, 22902 Memorandum To: Daniel Hyer, PE From: Cameron Langille, Principal Planner Division: Planning Date: October 22, 2020 Rev. 1: January 12, 2021 Rev. 2: March 12, 2021 Rev. 3: July 9, 2021 Subject: SDP202000061 Airport Road Sheetz — Final Site Plan Fax 434-972-4126 The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.] Comments to be addressed with the Final Site Plan submission: 2. A site plan meeting all the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code. FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. Rev. 2: Comment not yet fully addressed. Address the comment. Rev. 3: Comment stands. Once comments from ARB. Engineering, and ACSA are addressed. this comment will be addressed. 3. [32.5.2(a)] General information. Revise the following: i) This site plan is based upon a boundary line adjustment. Therefore, address the following: a. A boundary line adjustment plat must be submitted (separate application, fee and submission) and approved prior to the approval of the final site plan. FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment. Rev. 1: Comment not yet addressed. Submit a boundary line adjustment plat (separate application & fee) for review and approved prior to the approval of the final site plan. Rev. 2: Comment not yet fully addressed. The plat has been submitted and is under review. The plat, and any required documents, must be approved and recorded Prior to final site Plan approval. Rev. 3: Comment e. Rev. 3: SUB202100018 has been approved and recorded and the Plat vacated the parcel boundaries between TMPs 32-28, 32-39, and 32-39A. Per the note on Sheet C0.0, this has been acknowledged on the site plan by referencing the recorded plat instrument, DB 5551 pages 265- 272. 6. 132.5.20), (k) & (1)]] Existing sewer and drainage facilities; Private & public easements; Existing and proposed utilities. Address the following: b) See engineering comments in reference to required storm drainage easements and modification that will be required. FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. See engineering comments in reference to required storm drainage. Rev. 1: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment. Rev. 2: Comment not vet fully addressed. Address the comment. Rev. 3: Please see Engineering comments. Please send copy of recordation receipt for stormwater easements/deeds to Engineering. e) An easement plat must be submitted (separate application, fee and submission) and approved prior to the approval of the final site plan. FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment. Rev. 1: Comment not vet addressed. Address the comment. Rev. 2: Comment not vet fully addressed. The plat has been submitted and is under review. The plat, and any required documents, must be approved and recorded Prior to final site plan approval. Rev. 3: Comment addressed. SUB202100018 has been approved and recorded. f) Include the abandonment of any easement in the proposed easement plat. FINAL: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment. Rev. 1: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment. Rev. 2: Comment not yet fully addressed. The plat has been submitted and is under review. The plat, and any required documents, must be approved and recorded Prior to final site plan approval. Rev. 3: Comment addressed. SUB202100018 has been approved and recorded. h) Rev. 1 [New Comments Revise the labels in the site plan, for all "proposed easements", to include the Deed Book and Page number for all newly recorded easement plats prior to final site plan approval. Also, revise the labels to say "New" instead of "Proposed". Rev. 2: Comment not vet addressed. Address the following: i) Comment response letter states this will be addressed after plat is approved, which is appropriate. However, the lines can be added to the labels ahead of time so that wording and location can be reviewed and confirmed. "DB PG " (with blanks/underlines in Place of the numbers) is usually added at this stage. Rev. 3: Please update Sheets C4.0, C5.0 and C6.0 so that the callouts for the New Conservation Easement and New SWM Facility Easements reference both DB 5551pages 265-272 and DB 5559 pages 744-751. j) The temporary construction easement and access easement have already been recorded (and addressed. k) Rev. 2 [NEW COMMENTI: Revise the existing conditions sheet to label each easement that is to be vacated as "To Be Vacated". Also, ensure all easements to be vacated are no longer shown on the Proposed sheets. Rev. 3: Comment addressed. SUB202100018 has been approved and recorded. 132.5.2(m) & 32.5.2,(i)] Ingress and egress; Streets, easements and travelways. Address the following: f) Rev. 1 New Comments Revise the labels in the site plan, for all "proposed easements", to include the Deed Book and Page number for all newly recorded easement plats prior to final site plan approval. Also, revise the labels to say "New" instead of "Proposed. Rev. 2: Comment not vet addressed. The access easement has alreadv been recorded (and submitted). Therefore that information is already available and should be added Rev. 3: Comment addressed. 8. [32.5.2(n)] Existing and proposed improvements. Address the following: g) Show all street/accessway signage on the plan, ensure it is shown on the layout and landscaping sheets, and ensure there are no conflicts with landscaping. FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. Please get any clarification on required signs from engineering. In reference to this comment, show all existing and proposed signs in the Landscape Plan sheet and ensure that there are not conflicts between the signage and the landscaping. Rev. 1: Comment not yet addressed. Address comment. Comment response letter said this would be addressed after ARB approval. Show all street/accessway signage on the plan, ensure it is shown on the layout and landscaping sheets, and ensure there are no conflicts with landscaping. Rev. 2: Please clarify, will there be no stop signs Placed at either entrance. If stop signs will be located at the entrances, they should be shown on the site plan and all conflicts avoided h) Rev. 2 [NEW COMMENT]: Please remove the monument sign, and the landscaping directly irectly related to it, from the site plan. This comment was directed towards traffic signage although that may not have been clear. Monument signs, and business signs on the building, are approved in a separate Process and should not be shown on this sit plan. Rev. 3: Comment addressed. 9. 132.5.2.(e), 32.5.2.(p) & 32.6.2(j)] Landscape plan. A landscape plan is required in the final site plan that complies with section 32.7.9. A landscape plan was submitted but requires additional information for the final site plan. Such information should include, but is not limited to, the following: g) Include in the site plan a filled out, signed, and dated conservation checklist. FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. Ensure that the owner of the site also signs the Conservation Checklist. Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. Once the ownership has transferred ensure that the owner of the site also signs the Conservation Checklist in the appropriate location. Rev. 2: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment once ownership has changed. Rev. 3: Comment addressed. 13. [Comment] See the SRC comments from most of the reviewers attached. All SRC reviewer comments must be sufficiently address prior to final site plan approval. FINAL: Comment not yet fully addressed. See the comments from most of the reviewers attached. ARB comments are still pending (see below). All reviewer comments must be sufficiently address prior to final site plan approval. Rev. 1: Comment not yet fully addressed. Fire Rescue, Inspections and RWSA have no objections. See attached comments from Engineering, VDOT, and ACSA. All reviewer comments must be sufficiently address prior to final site plan approval. Rev. 2: Comment not vet fully addressed. See attached comments from Engineering, VDOT, and ACSA. ARB comments are still pending. All reviewer comments must be sufficiently address prior to final site plan approval. Rev. 3: Comment stands, oendina revisions requested by ARB, Engineering, and ACSA staff have been made. Once those reviewers have verified that all of their comments have been addressed this comment will be addressed. Please contact Cameron Langille in the Planning Division by using blanig lle@albemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext. 3432 for further information. Review Comments for SDP202000061 Final Site Development Plan Project Name: AIRPORT ROAD SHEER - FINAL - DIGITAL Date Completed: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 Department/DivisiordAgency: Review Status: Reviewer: David James CDD Enaineerino Requested Changes 1. Record plat for SWM facility easements, Access, Temporary Construction, Foresl/Open Space, Drainage easements needed prior to FSP approval. (Rev.112) SWM facility easements will need to be recorded along with the deed prior to FSP approval. (Rev.3) Pending SWM Deed recordation receipt. 2. (Rev-3) Please add the following note to the cover sheet: "The conservation easement shown herein contains protected forest & open space land that is subject to the guidance set forth by DEQ in the Virginia Stormwater Management Program. The areas will remain undisturbed in a natural, vegetated state, except for activities as approved by the local program authority, such as forest management, control of invasive species, replanting and revegetating, passive recreation (e.g., trails), and limited bush hogging to maintain desired vegetative community (but no more than four times a year)." Page: 1--1 County of Albemarle Printed On: 07/0912021 Review Comments for SDP202000061 Final Site Development Plan Project Name: AIRPORT ROAD SHEER -FINAL -DIGITAL Date Completed: Monday, June 28, 2021 Department/DivisiordAgency: Review Status: Reviewer: Khristopher Taggart �]J CDD ARB see Recommendations GW:7KI The ARB condition regarding landscaping, as it related to screening of mechanical equipment, from correspondence on March 16, 2021 has been addressed. Revisions related to conditions regarding air machine and vacuum station equipment color (from correspondence on March 16, 2021) and the architectural design of the store building (from ARB action letter on 3/1/21) are still outstanding. The applicable conditions are listed below: 1. Revise the color of the air machine and vacuum station equipment to one that is recessive, i.e., one that will reduce visibility and blend with the surroundings. 2. Eliminate the stone above the base at the southwest comer. Lower the comice height to match the main wall height. 3. Eliminate the stone above the base on the west elevation. Lower the cornice height to match the main wall height. 4. Revise the south -facing elevation of the southwest comer to compose the service door, awning, grease storage, and glazed opening to relate to each other with a coordinated appearance. The use of a single Mapes canopy may be appropriate. Pager County of Albemarle Printed On: 07/09/2021 Cameron Langille From: Richard Nelson <rnelson@serviceauthority.org> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2021 8:57 AM To: Cameron Langille Subject: FW: Airport Rd Sheetz CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Hi Cameron, Below are my comments that I sent to Ryan for the Sheetz. I was hoping to get a quick turnaround from him, but seems he is on vacation for the week. Thanks, Richard Nelson Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22911 (434)977-4511 From: Richard Nelson Sent: Friday, June 25, 20218:54 AM To: Ryan Cheney <rcheney@line-grade.com> Subject: RE: Airport Rd Sheetz Ryan, Minor comments on the site plan below: Provide 10' of easement behind the meters. Explore shallowing the water main going down the hill. Refer to snip below of profile. I'm scaling off of the PDF, but it looks like there would be adequate cover along the hill side if a bend is added. Reason being is that we would prefer the fittings be closer to minimum cover. 560 t.I.V, kl;i Thanks, Richard Nelson Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road