The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSUB201700129 Review Comments 2018-12-17 'COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE °F Department Community Development . g CTe_. Planning Services Division xv .� 401 McIntire Road North Wing•Charlottesville,Virginia 22 - Phone: (434)296-5823 •Fax: (434)972-4035 , Transmittal OYA From: Christopher Perez Date: 12/17/18 To: 0 Dar. /V �.e� — .ps¢Rr.�rr.�.� . 0 .. I,�eu4/g , �. 0 0 frIpliztAA, "ore_ — V oT 0 0 0 0 0 JOB#/FILE NAME:SUB-2017-000129 North Pointe Norhtwest Residential Area-Final Plat We are sending you the following items: ® Attached or ❑ Under separate cover ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ® Plats ❑ Specifications ❑ Other #of Date Description Copies 1 12-11-18 North Pointe Northwest Residential Area- Final These are transmitted as checked below: ® For review and comments ® For approval ❑ Other Remarks: Comments are due in City View or email by: 12/31/18 Signature: Christopher Perez Irovii ROUDABUSH, GALE & ASSOCIATES, INC. A, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION LAND SURVEYING Serving Virginia Since 1956 ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SURVEY DEPARTMENT 172 SOUTH PANTOPS DRIVE.STE.A 914 MONTICELLO ROAD JIM L.TAGGART.P.E. CIIARLOTTESVILLE.VA 22911 CI IARLOTTESVILLE.VA 22902 WILLIAM J.LEDBE'I'TER.L.S. DON FRANCO.Y.E. PHONE(434)979-8121 PI IONE(434)977-0205 BRIAN D.JAMISON,L.S. DAVID M.ROBINSON.P.E. FAX(434)979-1681 FAX(434)296-5220 DAVID A.JORDAN,L.S. AMMY M.GEORGE.L.A. INFO(i4 ROIIDABl1SH.COM KRISTOPIIER C WINTERS,L.S. A December'll,2018 " - - _ Christopher Perez, Senior Planner Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 RE: SUB201700129 North Pointe Northwest Residential Area- Final Subd. Plat Dear Chris, Please find attached five copies of the revised Plat. The plans have been revised to address your comments dated September 6,2018 in accordance with the following: [14-303(G),ZMA2013-14, ZMA2000-9]Application Plan. Clarify ownership of common areas. Is open space to be retained by the HOA with an easement dedicated to public use over certain portions? If so, please state as such and clarify ownership note 14 on sheet VI. Rev 1. The ownership of the open space parcels shall be revised on the plat, as it is not clear that the County is being dedicated all of open space A, B, and C through fee simple ownership. Additionally, open space A and B need to be revised to divide out the County dedicated portion and that of the HOA portion which contains the SWM facilities. The portions with SWM facilities shall be part of the open space the HOA owns. To be clear the County seeks fee simple ownership of these open space areas as the rezoning originally intended, see sheet G of the application plan. Please revise notes and graphics 'throughout the plat. Response: Areas to be dedicated to the county/ public use have been separated out into separate parcels, including floodplain, greenway, and public open space areas. 14-314] Provide deeds for areas to be dedicated to public use for review and approval by the County Attorney.Also, provide deeds for all public access easements. Rev 1. Comment not addressed. Response: Deeds to be provided by owner's counsel. 8 14-317] Provide instrument evidencing maintenance of all improvements that are not to be aintained by the County or other public agency. Rev 1. Comment not addressed. Response: Deeds to be provided by owner's counsel. 14-400] Lewis and Clark Drive needs to be built or bonded prior to approval of plat to provide frontage for lots 1 and 2. Rev 1. Comment partially addressed, as lot 1 is currently depicted as having frontage on Rte. 29. But what is the purpose of the 69' temporary access easement? Currently road plans are not approved for Lewis and Clark Drive (public right- of-way), thus the alignment can and most likely will change. Why plat this easement? The easement should be revised and platted as a public right-of-way for Lewis and Clark Drive. esponse: The right of wayfor Lewis and Clark Drive has been platted with this 9 submission. --11. [ZMA Application Plan] Continuous public access should be provided from the public right of way to the greenway in locations shown on the ZMA application plan. Show public access easements on sheet V3 to verify that public access is provided to dedicated greenways. Rev 1. While the easements have been depicted on the plat they do not match the width as pro ded for in the final site plan. Ensure the plat and the site plan mirror each other in loc on, width, and labeling of these easements. es onse: Public access easements have been updated to match the site plan. N12Comment] This plat cannot be approved until Engineering, ACSA, Parks & Rec, VDOT and Health Department complete their reviews and grant their approval. Engineering, VDOT and VDH comments are attached. Additional reviewer's comments will be forwarded upon receipt. Rev 1. Approvals have been received from ACSA&VDH. Outstanding review comments exist with Planning, Engineering, Parks and Recreation, and VDOT. Additional Review Comments on the Revision. Res•onse: See responses below. All omment] The plat should be held till the Final Site Plan, WPO Plan, and Road Plan are 'Wirer along in their reviews and closer to approval to ensure that the easements and features associated with the proposal are approvable and match these other plan sets. Response: Noted. 14. [S - 2(7B)] In addition to the other open space "dedication to public use" language that i quired on the plat for open space a, b, and c, provide a separate note on the plat that reads: "The greenway and pathways are dedicated for public use" Response: Note added (note 22). 15. [ZMA2013-14, ZMA2000-9] Proffer 9.1. The plat_should be revised to also include the necessary SWM easementspublic RIW dedication for Lewis Clark Drive which - cross onto TMP 32-22P. Ensure all applir, -ahle_ lap tting information is provided to allow this. Response: Right of way dedication and boundary line adjustment has been included with this submission. 4• ZMA2013-14, ZMA2000-9]Application Plan. The location of the lot line for Open Space B •:est to Lewis & Clark Drive (public R/W)doesn't appear to match the site plan. Staff is basing s analysis on the location of the existing 50' private access easement. Based on the application plan the publically dedicated open space should abut the public RNV dedication. Response: All lot lines have been updated to match the site plan. 1 . [Comment] On sheet 1, under area calculations, the original TMP is listed as 78-59; owever, this should truly be TMP 32-22K. Revise. Response: Revised. It 18. 013-14, ZMA2000-9] Setbacks. Currently the plat lists the front setback maximum as 5 , however, 30' is the maximum. Revise it to 30' maximum. Res o e: Revised. . [ZM 013-14, IX, 9.1] Provide all temporary construction easements to allow Stormwater Basin # 0 to be redesigned and enlarged to accommodate the school lot Stormwater. Please conta Christopher Perez in the Planning Division by using cperez@albemarle.org or 434-296- 583 ext. 3443 for further information. esponse: Waiting on further info. Engineering— Matthew Wentland 1. A Deed of Dedication will need to be signed and recorded for the SWM facility easements and the SWM Forest and Open Space easements. This will filled out by the County and forwarded to the applicant when the plat is nearing approval. A Stormwater Maintenance Agreement will also need to be completed first, please contact Ana Kilmer to begin that process. Response: Deeds to be provided by owner's counsel. 2. Engineering recommends performing the BLA with TMP 32-22P to provide the necessary ROW width, but this can also be done with the Final Plat. Response: Right of way dedication and boundary line adjustment has been included with this submission. VDOT—Adam Moore/Justin Deel 1. The Route 29 Improvement plans (SUB2016-196)for the entrance of this site and the Road Plan (SUB2016-112) have not been approved at the time of this letter. Response: Noted. Parks and Recreation -Dan Mahon 1. The County requests this land (greenway and floodway) dedicated be fee simple, not in easements. Response: Areas to be dedicated to the county I public use have been separated out into separate parcels, including floodplain, greenway, and public open space areas. 2. A pedestrian crossing/connection under the stream crossing culvert was previously discussed under the entrance road. Please depict this on the final site plan. Response: I will pass this on to the Engineer for the site plan. Thank you for taking the time to review this plat. Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information. Best, Bethany Velasquez Email cc: Christopher Perez, Scott Collins