HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201700129 Review Comments 2018-11-08 . eta
It was the consensus of the ARB that the following changes were necessary to accommodate the
revised parking:
1_71. Maintain the height of the building base across the elevations.
ht -i% /-,1 7)7%--11-1—edrii: .
Add a window or similar opening in the front elevation consistent with,the
other windows.11
l( °Z(1 -243i ,
c7.741,a,v —Iv 1.4_ d.,Lier..vvvi e>, /7671,4-7i
Add brick to the sides and back wall of the new parking area.
- iviit 4-1-1-61- 174 1-"*"4/
/J-401,/ A„,,,, -n, 7,a,,7-.).,e4 4,,,v 7/'''''.-
g." „..„,
4. I crease the epth of the brick beam.
Gytk fav4 P . pti/V1471'2,711/1'"j
5. Revise the drawings to show an accurate grading condition.
MAA/2-vd
evergreen screening on the opposite side of the travelway. 3
L/ d
6. Provide an offsite planting easement to meet the EC landscape requirements.-If an easement
cannot be obtained, locate the off-site trees to on-site locations.
Rev. 1: Comment not yet addressed. Address the following:
a) The exhibit mentioned in the comment response letter does not appear to have been submitted
with this submission. Submit the exhibit for review with the next official submittal.
Rev. 2: Comment addressed.
b) Submit the agreements with the adjoining parcel owners with an official submittal once they
become available.
Rev.2: Comment not yet addressed. Address the comment.
(.7
11. Add trees in the two parking islands adjacent to the main entrance and in the middle parking lot
island on the far side of the west parking lot behind the light pole to meet the interior tree
requirement.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed. Although a tree was added in the middle parking lot island on the far
side of the west parking lot,behind the light pole,it does not appear that either of the two trees specified at the
front main entrance have been added. Add trees in the two parking islands adjacent to the main entrance.
Rev.2: Comment not fully addressed. Two of the three trees have been added. Provide one
more tree in the parking islands. Although the location originally discussed in the ARB meeting
is no longer available because of the relocation of the proposed sewer easement the relocation
has opened up another location in that same island. There is not a location, near the end of the
island and closest to the access way behind Target,that no longer has easements under it and
has an open area where the tree may be placed.
rAll 42/41j1
18. Rev.2: NEW COMMENT] The landscaping quantities do not appear to ct.
nsure that all quantities are shown correctly. The ye ,vi ibpmfin and weetsp' e appear
to be incorrect.
13 o ,,./o a-vL.
3 (--vk,seie__06,..4
. [Rev.2: NEW COMMENT' Ensure all revised sheet have an updated revision date before
v.11----
resubmission. The architectural plans did not have a revision date for this last submission
despite some of the sheets having been revised.