HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201700129 Correspondence 2018-06-25 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
• REVISED APPLICATION SUBMITTAL
This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. County staff
has indicated below what they think will be required as a resubmission of revisions. If you need to submit
additional information please explain on this form for the benefit of the intake staff. All plans must be
collated and folded to fit into legal size files,in order to be accepted for submittal.
TO: Paty Saternve DATE: 0-_,6/2-ai
PROJECT NAME: ARB2017-129 HTC Hotel
Submittal Type Requiring Revisions()indicates Submittal Code County Project Number # Copies
Erosion& Sediment Control Plan(E&S)
Mitigation Plan(MP)
Waiver Request(WR)
Stormwater Management Plan(SWMP)
Road Plan(RP)
Private Road Request,with private/public comparison(PRR)
Private Road Request—Development Area(PRR-DA)
Preliminary Site Plan(PSP)
Final Site Plan(or amendment)(FSP)
Final Plat(FP)
Preliminary Plat(PP)
Easement Plat(EP)
Boundary Adjustment Plat(BAP)
Rezoning Plan(REZ)
Special Use Permit Concept Plan(SP-CP)
Reduced Concept Plan(R-CP)
Proffers(P)
Bond Estimate Request(BER)
Draft Groundwater Management Plan(D-GWMP)
Final Groundwater Management Plan(F-GWMP)
Aquifer Testing Work Plan(ATWP)
Groundwater Assessment Report(GWAR)
Architectural Review Board(ARB) ARB201700129 2
Other: Please explain
(For staff use only)
Submittal Code #Copies Distribute To: Submittal Code #Copies Distribute To:
ARB 2 Paty Saternye
Re-submittal Form-31 Mar 2005
PROJECT
CIVIL E N GI NEERN GmANAGEMENT
LAND PLANNING
SHIft
ENGINEERING:
June 25TH, 2018
Paty Saternye
Senior Planner
Albemarle County
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: Hollymead Town Center Hotel—ARB submittal (2)
Dear Ms. Saternye,
Provided in this ARB package is the comment response, site plan, planting easement exhibit, architectural
elevations, roof plan, and floor plans for the HTC Hotel project.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact me via e-mail at Peter@shimp-engineering.com or Justin
Shimp at Justin@shimp-engineering.com or by telephone at 434-227-5140.
Sincerely,
Peter Russell
Shimp Engineering, P.C.
4ROWCTAAEMM ENGINNGEERINENTG
LAND PLANNING
ENGINEERING
June 2ST", 2018
Paty Saternye,
County of.Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville,VA 22902
Regarding: SDP 201700070 HTC Hotel—Comfort Inn—Final Site Plan
Dear Ms.Saternye,
Thank you for your ARB review.of the final site plan for HTC Hotel.We have:reviewed and revisedthe plan
per your most recent comments dated May 30, 2018.See below for detailed responses to each of your comments.
A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval.
1. Revise the window glass note. Ensure that the note is"Visible light transmittance(VLT)shall not
drop below 40%. Visible light reflectance (VLR)shall not exceed30%."
Rev. 1: Comment not yet addressed. Revise the note on the architectural plans to state exactly the
standard note specified above.The "(VLT)" and "(VLR)" have not been included in the statement.
-"(VLT)"and "(VLR)" have been added to the window glass note.
2. Specify the height above the parapet for any rooftop equipment and show the elevator tower
on the elevations.Show rooftop screening for the mechanical equipment and elevator tower
in the building elevations. If a fence is proposed as the means of screening, include a detail in
the drawings.
-Provided on architectural drawings
Rev. 1: Comment addressed
3. Ensure that the proposed landscaping does not conflict with the mechanical equipment's location
at the southwest corner of the building.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed.The shrubs still appear to be too close to the'condenser units. In
discussion with Building Inspections it appears that the units need a 36" clearance. Revise the location of
the shrubs,or remove them.from the site plan,so that there is no conflict with the mechanical
equipment.
-Shrubs have been removed to not conflict with mechanical equipment.
4. Locate loading, service and storage areas on the plans.Show how visibility of these features will be
Page 1 of 4
eliminated.Alternatively, indicate that no such areas areproposed.
-There is no loading space, because there is no need for one.There is no interior restaurant or use that
would require a loading space.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed
5. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the architectural plans.
Rev. 1: Comment not yet addressed.The standard mechanical equipment note does not yet appear to
have been added to the architectural plans.Add the note "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from
the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated."To the architectural plans.
-Standard mechanical equipment note provided on architectural drawings.
6. Provide an offsite planting easement to meet the EC landscape requirements.
Rev. 1: Comment not yet addressed.Address the following:
a)The exhibit mentioned in the comment response letter does not appear to have been submitted with this
submission.Submit the exhibit for review with the next official submittal.
-Exhibit is include with submittal.
b)Submit the agreement with the adjoining parcel owners with an official submittal once they become
available.
-Agreement will be submitted as soon as it is received.
7. Add a tree on the north side of the building. Because of the proximity to the building, a smaller tree
type may be accepted.
EDIT-A serviceberry(Amelanchier x grandiflora) provided on the north side of building
8. Provide a signed conservation checklist,and provide tree protection fencing on the grading,
landscaping and E&SC plan sheets at the south edge of the property to protect the trees on
the Target lot.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed.A conservation checklist was added to sheet C11, and a note
was added to the landscape plan. However,the line in the landscape plan appears to be directly
on top of the property line and therefore cannot be differentiated from the property line.Also,
the tree protection fencing does not appear to have been provided on any other sheets. Provide
trees protection fencing on the grading, landscaping and E&SC plan sheets and ensure that both
the line work and the labels are visible.
-The tree protection fencing line has been bolded to help with visibility. Due to the quantity of utilities along the back
site of Target,the tree protection fencing will be difficult to see. No grading will take place beyond the tree protection
line.Tree protection fencing has been provided on the grading, landscape,and E&SC sheets. Please note the E&SC
is not included in this SP drawing set,but is a part of the VSMP packet. I will be happy to provide an additional tree
protection fencing exhibit if one is needed.
9. Adjust the labels and symbols for the landscaping in the Target parcel so that the leaders for the
labels point to the symbol they are meant to identify.
-Labels and symbols adjusted along Target for legibility
Rev. 1: Comment addressed
10. Remove both of the notes that specify that landscape requirements will not be met.They are note
#5 and the note on the interior road and parking area treecounts.
-Note removed
Rev. 1: Comment addressed
Page 2 of 4
11. Add trees in the two parking islands adjacent to the main entrance and in the middle
parking lot island on the far side of the west parking lot behind the light pole to meet the
interior tree requirement.
Rev. 1: Comment not fully addressed.Although a tree was added in the middle parking lot island
on the far side of the west parking lot, behind the light pole, it does not appear that either of the
two trees specified at the front main entrance have been added.Add trees in the two parking
islands adjacent to the main entrance.
-Trees were not added in parking islands in previous submission because of the proposed sanitary
lateral.The lateral has been lowered to 5+feet below proposed grade to avoid any complications. One
tree has been added to landscape plan.A tree was not added to the far side of the parking lot because
ACSA requested a relocation of the sanitary line which conflicts with the requested tree location.
12. Limit the number of proposed plants for any one species to 25%of the total proposed for that
plant type (tree, shrub). Reduce the percentage ofsycamores.
-Provided
Rev. 1: Comment addressed
13. Revise the proposed landscape schedule so that all trees, including sassafras, have a minimum
caliper of 2%2".
-Provided
Rev. 1: Comment addressed
14. Ensure that any loading,service or storage area are screened and integrated into the site with
appropriate landscaping.Alternatively,specify if none are proposed.
-None are proposed
Rev. 1: Comment addressed
15. Adjust the labels and symbols for the landscaping in the Target lot so that the leaders for the labels
point to the symbol they are meant to identify.
-Provided leaders for Target landscaping
Rev. 1: Comment addressed
16. Note that a separate sign application will be required.
-Acknowledged.A separate sign will be submitted.
Rev. 1: Comment addressed
17. [Rev. 1: NEW COMMENT]Submit the full set of architectural exhibits and ensure that color
elevations are provided.With the most recent submission of the architectural packet two sheets,
the floor plans,were not provided.Also,the elevations were provided in black and white and not
color.
-Acknowledged. Included in this submission are architectural floor plans,elevations, and roof plan. Elevations
have been provided in color.
Page 3 of 4
If you have any questions or concerns about these revisions:please feel free to call me at(434) 227-5140 or
email Peter Russell at peter@shimp-engineering.com and we can discuss any questions that you may have in
further detail.
Best Regards,
Peter Russell
Shimp Engineering, P.C.
Page 4 of 4
hTC HOTEL: ADJACENT PARCEL IMPROVEMENTS
,
t
EX. WATER EASEMENT i : '* .. .
''-' * :: : litilrA-, _\''
°' =� v' '`f. ONE SYCAMORE
SIDEWALK • ��� � -�* , /-1 >������m. �— • ' SEVEN PRAGUE
PARKING LIGHT i = VIBURNUM
FIXTURE ,-f . v i Y a l DUMPSTER
FT ii_ , • „ I • AND PAD
9 4
•L\ • ' WATER EASEMENT
1w —w w 4w ,—:w w w '—
WATERLINE I i L • n���\�1� — SEWER EASEMENT
SANITARY LINE — f-_:r_
AND MANHOLE
ONE ALLEE ELM _________
!- —
ACSA BLANKET — I Ii o • e • '
EASEMENT ; ..
• 1,' ::
A
1"=20' N
'D D J
SHIMP ENGINEERING, P.C.
ENGINEERING-LAND PLANNING-PROJECT MANAGEMENT
201 E MAIN ST, STE M PHONE: (434) 227-5140
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902 JUSTIN®SHIMP-ENGINEERING.COM