Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04 19 77 PC MinutesZOS April 19, 1977 The Albemarle County Planning Commission conducted a meeting on Tuesday, April 19, 1977, 7:30 p.m., Board Room, County Office Building, Charlottesville, Virginia, to consider a series of site plans and subdivision plats. Those members present were David W. Carr, Chairman; Roy Barksdale; Kurt Gloeckner; Dr. James Moore; Mrs. Joan Graves; Leslie Jones; Paul Peatross; Col. William Washington; and Mrs. Opal David, ex-Officio. Absent was Commissioner Peter Easter, Vice -Chairman. Other officials present were Mrs. Mary Joy Scala, Senior Planner; Mr. Ronald Keeler, Assistant Director of Planning; and Mr. Frederick Payne, Deputy County Attorney. Mr. Carr established that a quorum was present and called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Mr. Carr informed possible interested members of the public present the status of the following items: Ivy Woods plat is deferred until May; Ednam Village is deferred until May; and the Bell/Rust plat has been withdrawn. Mr. Carr stated that there is to be a joint City/County Committee which will address highway planning matters for the future, with emphasis placed on the urban area. He said that he had already spoken with two members of the Commission who had agreed to serve on that Committee. He appointed Dr. Moore temporary chairman of that committee, and appointed Mr. Gloeckner to the other post on the committee. PYROFAX REVISED SITE PLAN: Mrs. Scala presented the staff report, informing the Commission that the property is located on the west side of Route 29 North at Northside Industrial Park. Property in question is zoned M-2 Industrial. A site plan was approved in November, 1975 with conditions and a revised site plan was deferred in March, 1977, to resolve problems. The proposed revised site plans has been submitted to obtain approval of as -built conditions before permanent certificate of occupancy can be issued. The Building and Zoning Departments are requiring that permanent certificate of occupancy be obtained by June 10, 1977. The staff noted that revisions to the original approved plan include the driveway layout which presents no problem, and the addition of a 500-gallon fuel tank for the showroom. The applicant has obtained a setback variance to locate the tank within 100 feet from the A-1 zone. The decel lane has been paved, and although not complete, safety has improved. The only problem to be resolved is the question of the water line size. The original site plan was approved subject to Fire Marshal's approval. A plan showing an 8" water line was submitted by Pyrofax to the Fire Marshal and was approved. At a later date, the developer received Engineering approval for the lines which the Service Authority would accept. Although the service line serving Pyrofax was not a part of the approval, it was shown on those plans as 4" and constructed that way. The Fire Marshal has subsequently approved the use of the 4" 'ZO(-, line for Pyrofax, however he has stated that when the property develops behind Pyrofax, an 8" line will be required to serve it. Staff feels that approval of this 4" line would be poor planning, and feels that the developer should provide an 8" line to the back property. Staff recommended approval of the site plan subject to the following conditions: 1. Decel lane completed prior to permanent certificate of occupancy; 2. An 8" water line provided by developer to the rear property. ( Mr. Peatross entered the meeting. ) Mrs. Graves asked if the Badger-Powhatan property is the rear property addressed in the staff report. Mrs. Scala said no, that the Badger-Powhatan property is served by an 8" line. She said that she is addressing parcels a, b, and c. Mr. Peatross questioned the status of the driveway to Hall and Taylor site plan. Mrs. Scala told Mr. Peatross that the entrance to Pyrofax is not the access to Hall and Taylor. Mr. Gloeckner questioned the size of the water line serving the fire hydrant. Mrs. Scala said that the water line :is 8" to the hydrant, and from there is 4". Mr. Kelly Reynolds explained to the Commission the requirements he had made in February, 1977, and stated that the plan that was submitted to him showed 8" lines. He said that he approved that plan. Mrs. Graves asked if this plan had gone through Site Review. Mrs. Scala said that this particular plan had not gone through that committee, however, after the plan was received by the Planning Department it was taken to the Engineering Department and the Fire Marshal for comments. Mr. Skip Gelletley said that this is an as -built plan. He said that the delay in the decel lane had been a matter of finances, however, it would be constructed as required by the County, prior to June 10, 1977, when a certificate of occupancy will hopefully be obtained. ( Col. Washington entered the meeting. ) Mr. Gelletley said that the 8" line had been part of the plan approved by Mr. Reynolds on the assumption that a loop road around the property would be built. He said that is not possible , due to the 60' right-of-way required by the Virginia Department of Highways. ( Mrs. David entered the meeting. ) Mr. Reynolds said that a loop road with the 8" water line would never be approved by him, since it would decrease water pressure, if it were ever needed. He said that he had not approved the plan in February, 1977, on that basis. 207 Mr. Gelletley told Mr. Carr that he does not own parcels a, b, and c. Mr. Gloeckner asked if the owners of these parcels are aware that they will have to bring water to their property. Mr. Gelletly said that they are aware of this. Mr. Reynolds aamnt old the Commission that he was not aware of, nor had he ever been consulted &he change in plans for the water line. He said that they are not part of the plan that he had approved. Under no circumstances would a loop have been satisfactory. Mrs. Graves asked if the Fire Marshal were saying that parcels a, b, and c would not be able to get water for adequate fire protection. Mr. Reynolds stated that these parcels need at least an 8" line, more if the use were something like a lumber operation. Mr. Keeler addressed the memo from the Engineering Department, stating that the 4" line is adequate to serve only Pyrofax. Mr. Carr said that the question seems to be if the County can require this developer to build an 8" line for other developments. can and should Mr. Reynolds said that he feels the County require the 8 line, since this particular development is creating the hazard. He thus feels that this developer should provide water for future uses in the area, not just his own. Mr. Carr asked what the rules and regulations of the County are with regard to what demands the Commission can make. Mr. Reynolds said that the County can demand adequate water lines for development. Mrs. Graves said that originally the County had requested to see plans for the entire development. She asked what would be required if the 8" lines which the Fire Marshal had approved in February, 1977, had been constructed. Mr. Reynolds replied that the 8" line is what is needed, at least, to serve the remaining area. Mr. Gloeckner stated that in his opinion Pyrofax is responsible td adhere to the conditions placed on the original plan. Mr. Keeler informed the Commission that the County has the right to require this 8" line, plus any off -site hydrants that might be necessary for adequate fire protection. Mr. Peatross asked if,when the Engineering Department reviewed the plans for lines that would be taken over by the Service Autbority, the 4" lines had been put in. Mr. Gelletley said that they had not been put in at that time. Mr. Peatross inquired the cost of replacing the 4" lines with 8" lines. It was determined that the cost would be $3,000 to $3,200. Mr. Gloeckner again pointed out that the developer had agreed to construct 8" lines to begin with, when they presented a plan showing 8" lines to the Fire Marshal for his approval. • Mr. Carr asked if the Service Authority approves water lines that are not approved by the Fire Marshal. Mr. Reynolds responded that they can approve lines for domestic use; they are responsible for only potable water, not for fire protection. Mr. Keeler said that it is the responsibility of the applicant to meet the conditions of site plan approval. Mr. Peatross moved approval of the site plan subject to the following two conditions: 1. Decel lane completed prior to permanent certificate of occupancy; 2. An 8" water line provided by developer to the rear property. Mr. Barksdale seconded the motion, which carried by a vote of 7-0-1, with Col Washington abstaining. E. R. SNODDY REVISED FINAL PLAT: Mrs. Scala reported that the A-1 zoned property is located on the east side of Route 20 South near Wood Store. The proposal is a redivision of two lots into three lots; average size of 2.35 acres. On March 22 the Commission deferred action on this plat in order for it to be re -drawn. Originally it had shown 3 pipestem lots. All the lots now have adequate width. Lots 1 and 2 will share anew entrance over the 30' easement. Staff recommended approval of this plat, subject to the following conditions, because it is a better division than the original plat: 1. Health Department approval; 2. Private entrance located at 30' easement is subject to Virginia Department of Highways approval. Mr. Barksdale moved approval of the plat subject to the conditions recommended by the staff. Mr. Gloeckner seconded this motion, which carried unanimously, with no discussion HALL AND TAYLOR REVISED SITE PLAN: Mrs. Scala presented the staff report, noting that the M-2 zoned property is located in Northside Industrial Park. A special permit was approved in February, 1976, and a site plan was approved in April, 1976. This proposed revised plan shows the addition for exterior paint storage, a relocated entrance and landscaping which was not shown previously. The developer is proposing hardwoods or dogwoods along Northside Drive to be carried out as each plan is submitted in Northside Park. In addition, the parking area will be screened with white pines. The staff recommended approval subject to a series of conditions. Mrs. Scala noted that preliminary approval has already been given by the Highway Department, however an entrance permit must be secured. N-A Mr. Peatross asked if the problem with the entrance has been eliminated. Mrs. Scala said that this is being worked out, and the certificate of occupancy will not be issued on any building in Northside Park until the entrance road is safe for public travel. Mrs. Graves asked if adjacent owners had been notified of this site plan. Mrs. Scala said that this has the same adjacent owners as Pyrofax and Badger-Powhatan a nd she saw no need for another notification. Mr. Reynolds, after questioning about the water lines, replied that he is 100o satisfied with this plan. Mr. Barksdale moved approval of the site plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. Hardwoods or dogwoods should be noted as 30' on -center, minimum 4-5' in height; 2. All landscaping to be compelted or bonded prior to certificate of occupancy; 3. Entrance subject to Virginia Department of Highways approval. The motion was seconded by Mr. Jones, and carried unanimously, with no further discussion. BADGER-POWHATAN WAREHOUSE SITE PLAN: Mrs. Scala stated that this M-2 zoned property is located on the west side of Route 29 North in Northside Industrial Park. The proposal is to locate a warehouse facility. There will be no employees. The staff commented that it should be noted that a certificate of occupancy will not be issued on any building in Northside Park until the entrance road is safe for public travel. The staff recommended the following conditions of approval: 1. Entrance subject to Virginia Department of Highways approval; 2. Retaining wall plans subject to Building Inspection approval; 3. No building permit until plat of Parcel F is signed; 4. Health Department approval; 5. Grading permit; 6. All landscaping to be completed or bonded prior to C.O. Mrs. Scala stated that white pine screening is shown. The Fire Marshal has already given approval to the site plan. Mr. Reynolds stated that the fire lane must be in before the building is occupied. Mr. Jones suggested adding the following seventh condition: 7. The access lane ( fire lane ) with a firm foundation to be approved by Fire Marshal prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. Mrs. Graves questioned the outside lighting. Mr. Gelletly said that it will primarily consist of lighting entrances, but no other lighting will affect adjacent properties. 210 Mr. Gloeckner moved approval subject to the six conditions recommended by the staff, plus the seventh condition suggested by Mr. Jones. Mr. Barksdale seconded the motion. Mr. Peatross asked that condition #6 be amended to read: 6. All landscaping to be completed or bonded prior to the certificate of occupancy, except what is addressed in condition V . Messrs. Gloeckner and Barksdale accepted this amendment. The motion to approve subject to the amended condition #6, the additional condition 07), and conditions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ( as recommended by the staff ) carried unanimously, with no further discussion. GRANGER USED AUTO SALES SITE PLAN: Mr. Payne disqualified himself from the discussion as counsel and left the room. Mrs. Scala stated that the B-1 property is located on the west side of Route 742 ( Avon Street Extended ). The proposal is a used auto sales on part of 1.587- acre parcel. Granger Auto Sales is presently located on Garrett Street. The staff stated that a variance was obtained in order for the shop to be located with- in 50' of the A-1 zone. A grading permit has been obtained. Fire Marshal has approved the plan with no spray painting. If it is added at a later date, Fire Marshal must approve it. The staff recommended the following conditions of approval: 1. Virginia Department of Highways approval of commercial entrance on Rotue 1101; 2. 25' dedication along Route 1101; 3. Health Department approval. Mrs. Graves said that in site review, it was pointed out that there are currently 2 mobile homes on the property. She said at that meeting the applicant had stated that he will remove these two mobile homes. Mr. Granger stated that this is correct. Mr. Gloeckner moved approval of the site plan subject to the conditions recommended by the staff. The motion, seconded by Mr. Barksdale, carried unanimously, with no discussion. ( Mr. Payne returned to the meeting. ) SUZANNE SMITH MCGUIRE FINAL PLAT: Mrs. Scala reported that this A-1 property is located on the east side of Route 691. The proposal is a redivision of two existing lots and creation of a new 25' access easement. New lots contain 2.0 acres and 4.6 acres; each contain a residence. The purpose of the plat is that the residence on the 4-acre parcel was constructed too close to the line. This plat will correct that error. The staff feels that the redivision is an improvement. There is a note on the plat regarding no further subdivision. No conditions of approval are necessary. Mr. Jones moved approval of the plat as presented to the Commission. Mr. Gloeckner seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. LAWRANCE STALLINGS FINAL PLAT: Mrs. Scala stated that this A-1 property is located on the north side of Route 622 near the Fluvanna County line. The proposal is a division for nine 2-acre lots. Seven lots have previously been approved. The residue of 76.6 acres will be served by a 50' pipestem between lots 12 and 13. A 50' pipestem was also reserved between lots 4 and 5 on the previous plat. The Highway Department has stated that sight distance for the possible future entrance would be adequate with clearing. Joint entrances have been shown. Health Department approval has been received. Staff recommended approval subject to the following condition: 1. Private entrances are subject to Virginia Department of Highways approval. Mr. Jones asked what is next to lot 8. Mr. Keeler stated that 7 previously approved lots are adjacent. Mr. Barksdale moved approval subject to the condition recommended by the staff. Mr. Jones seconded the motion, which carried unanimously, with no further discussion. C. VERNON DURRER FINAL PLAT: Mrs. Scala stated that this A-1 property is located on the east side of Route 641 near Advance Mills. The proposal is a 2-acre lot on a proposed 25' access easement. Since three properties will use this existing entrance, it must be upgraded to a commercial entrance. Staff recommended approval subject to the following two condtions: 1. Entrance is subject to Virginia Department of Highways approval; 2. Health Department approval. Mr. Peatross moved approval of the plat subject to the conditions recommended by the staff. Mr. Gloeckner seconded the motion, which carried unanimously, with no discussion. Since there was no further business, e meeting adjourned at 8: p.m. Z' Ro kert W. Tucker, Jr. ecre ry