HomeMy WebLinkAbout06 28 77 PC MinutesJune 28, 1977
The Albemarle County Planning Commission conducted a regular meeting on June
28, 1977, 7:30 p.m., County Courthouse, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Those members in attendance were Mr. David Carr, Chairman; Mr. Roy Barksdale;
Mr. Kurt Gloeckner; Mr. Paul Peatross; Mr. Leslie Jones; Col. William R. Washington;
and Mrs. Joan Graves. Mr. Peter Easter and Dr. James Moore were absent.
Other officials present were Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr., Director of Planning;
and Mr. Carlos M. Montenegro, Planner.
Mr. Carr established that a quorum was present and called the meeting to order.
He stated that there are no minutes to be reviewed by the Commission.
Mr. Carr stated that the applicants, Daniel and Lorene Robinson, of ZMA-77-06,
Vuelund RPN have requested deferral of this item until the meeting of July 19, 1977.
Mr. Barksdale so moved, Mr. Jones seconded the motion, which carried unanimously with
no further discussion.
Mr. Carr informed the Commission that the applicants for the Pizza Inn Site Plan
have requested indefinite deferral of this item.
WILCO GAS SITE PLAN
Mr. Montenegro presented the staff report to the Commission noting the proposal,
location and history of this plan. He noted that this site plan was deferred from the
May 17th meeting at the request of the applicant; the variance for the canopy was
granted by the Board of Zoning Appeals on April 27, 1977 subject to an agreement to
waive any compensation should the canopy have to be removed for highway widening. Mr.
Montenegro told the Commission that the staff recommended that the pump island meet
the setback from the proposed right-of-way line regardless of the variance and has been
shown as requested. The staff recommends approval of this site plan subject to
1) Highway Department approval 2) a grading permit is required including Engineering
Department approval of the drainage 3) Health Department approval of the well and
septic system.
Col. Washington asked what type of sewer facilities, if any, are available.
Mr. Montenegro stated that there is some type of central sewer system across Route 250,
however, the Health Department has indicated that this system is no longer adequate.
Col. Washington asked what the size of the lot is. Mr. Montenegro stated that
it is 36,000 sq.ft. Col. Washington asked how it will be possible to put a well and
septic system on that size lot. Mr. Montenegro reinterated that this is an existing lot;
it is not being subdivided, the Commission cannot deny it.
Mr. Tucker added that the construction is not allowed to begin until Health
Department approval has been received.
WILCO GAS SITE PLAN, continued
Mr. Montenegro said that there was concern regarding the septic field; the staff
has made certain that it remained at least 100-feet away from the nearest well. The
concern was of an adjacent property owner, Mr. John Boswell.
Mr. Barksdale added that the attorney that represented the gasoline dealers had
a list of requirements such as fire extinguishers. Mr. Tucker noted that the fire marshal
will inform the applicant of his requirements.
There were no public comments. Mr. Gloeckner moved for approval with the conditions
recommended by the staff. Mr. Peatross seconded the motion which carried unanimously with
no further discussion.
ALBEMARLE DIVIERSIFIED INVESTMENTS PRELIMINARY PLAT
Mr. Montenegro presented the staff report to the Commission noting the location,
proposal and history of this development. He stated that the staff feels that the lot layout
deals well with the topography, the lot sizes are desirable and the entrances are well
located. The staff recommends approval of this plan with four conditions: 1) a note on
the plan from Mr. Quail of Albemarle Diversified Investments, stating that the roadway shown
on the attached plat is a driveway easement, the maintenance of which will not be the
responsibility of the Commonwealth of Virginia, the County of Albemarle or any other public
body. The maintenance of the said roadway will be solely the responsibility of the owners
of the lots abutting thereon, each of who will be responsible for his prorated share of
such maintenance. Mr. Montenegro said that this note that is a condition of the staff
should be reviewed by the County Attorney's office. 2) Highway Department approval of
entrance locations including issuance of commericial entrance permits. Mr. Montenegro
noted that the Highway Department has reviewed the entrances for sight distance and have
approved them as shown on the plan. 3) a note should be placed on the plan regarding
the maintenance of the ponds and reviewed by the County Attorney. 4) a grading permit
will be required for the final plat approval.
Mr. Carr asked for public comment on this item. Mr. William Poats, from the public,
stated that he is representing his mother who owns the property adjacent to this develop-
ment, across Route 766. He stated that his mother's property is currently zoned A-5, and
asked if this subdivision will have any bearing on this zoning. Mr. Tucker informed Mr.
Poats that the A-5 zoning was proposed on this property approximately two years ago, the
Board of Supervisors never adopted this zoning, therefore, the property is zoned A-1.
Mr. Tucker added that this development will have no bearing on the existing zoning of his
mother's property.
Mr. Poats asked what guidelines will determine the size and cost of the homes to be
constructed within this subdivision. Mr. Tucker told him that there are no such controls,
the Supreme Court has ruled that to be unconstitutional. Mr. Poats asked Mr. Tucker what
the minimum lot size is for the houses in this development. Mr. Tucker stated that the
minimum lot size is 2-acres, the average lot size in this development is 3.8-acres and ranges
as high as 5-acres. Mr. Poats asked if the developers have any criteria or guidelines to
indicate the type of construction.
Mr. Carr asked if the owner or representative of this property is present.
Mr. McLean, the applicant was present. He stated that there will be restrictions of
the deed, indicating that this development will be constructed with the minimum of cost
in housing.
_ � _
J
ALBEMARLE DIVERSIFIED INVESTMENTS PRELIMINARY PLAT, continued
Mr. Poats stated that Route 766 is a very narrow, one-way road. He asked if
this development will increase the traffic flow on this road and therefore require
improvements to be made. Mr. Carr stated that there is no way for the Commission to
answer that question. It will be determined in keeping with whatever other demands
are placed on the budget of the Highway Department.
Mrs. Opal David, ex-officio, entered the meeting.
Mr. Poats asked if these improvements are made, will his property be damaged in
any way to acquire the proper right-of-way. Mr. Carr stated that this development was
-yrequired to dedicate 25'for such future improvements.
Mr. Poats stated that Route 614 is the main frontage road to this development
and asked if there are any plans tentative to scrape or widen this road. Mr. Carr stated
that those plans are too far in the making, the Commission cannot answer that question.
Mr. Poats stated that this development will make the improvement of Route 614 a necessity.
Mr. Henry Wesley, from the public, stated that his property is also adjacent to
this proposed subdivision, and asked if Route 766 is widened, what will happen to his
property.
Mr. Carr stated that if additional right-of-way is needed, there are several
ways of achieving it 1) to purchase it 2) to condemn it 3) to have the owner give it
up or dedicate it to the Highway Department. Mr. Carr stated that no improvements to
this road will be made until development increases.
Mr. Barksdale added that no improvements will be made unless this is a sand and
gravel road.
There were no further public comments.
Mr. Jones asked if the Fire Marshal has approved this development as far as being
able to get emergency access within the subdivision.
Mr. Montenegro stated that he believes there will be no parking along the driveway
easements; the Fire Marshal has seen the plan for this development.
Mrs. Graves asked if there is any residue acreage. Mr. Montenegro stated that
there is none.
Col. Washington asked if it is necessary to warn either the developer or the
Charlottesville Water Supply that there is an existing water main. Mr. Montenegro told
Col. Washington that there will be no grading in that area. The easement has been noted
on the plat and all the adjacent property owners will get a copy of the plat. Mr. Tucker
added that the plats are on file in the Building Inspections Department.
Mr. Jones asked why the frontage requirements of 6 of the 17 lots were waived, when
there is no frontage. Mr. Montenegro said that pipestems can be used. He added that the
lot layout is the best desireable with the topography of the property.
Mr. Barksdale moved that this item be approved with the conditions recommended by
the staff. Mr. Peatross seconded the motion. Col. Washington added that this plat should
be subject to no further subdivision. Mr. Montenegro stated that no further subdivision
can occur, but that he will place a note on the plat to that effect.
I -
ALBEMARLE DIVERSIFIED INVESTMENTS PRELIMINARY PLAT, continued
The motion carried seven to one, with Mr. Jones dissenting.
There were no further discussion or comments.
LANGFORD FINAL PLAT
Mr. Gloeckner, surveyor of this plat, disqualified himself for comments.
Mr. Montenegro presented the staff report to the Commission, noting the proposal,
location and history of this development. He stated that the preliminary of this plat
was approved by the Commission on May 10, 1977 subject to six conditions: 1)waiver of
double frontage for lots 34, 35 and 39 2) reduction of the frontage requirements for lots
5, 6, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 30, 31, 32 and 39 3) Highway and Engineering Department
approval of internal roads, 4) a grading permit is required for final approval 5) that
frontage road number 1 be improved to Class B, Category 2 standard of the Albemarle County
Subdivision Ordinance, and 6) no buildings or septic fields will be placed on slopes of
25% or greater.
Mr. Montenegro noted that the applicant is requesting that condition #5 of the
preliminary plat be waived, noting that it will be complied with in the second phase of
development. The staff feels that these 10 lots will not be burdensome to the existing
frontage road, if said improvements are necessary. The staff recommends approval of this
plat subject to the following four conditions: 1) Highway and Engineering Department
approval of the internal roads, 2) a grading permit will be required for final
approval, 3) no buildings or septic fields will be placed on slopes of 25% or
greater, 4) Highway Department approval of the entrance facilities.
Mr. Peatross asked if the applicant doesn't develop the remaining lots or submit
a final site plan, will the road be considered adequate in the staff's opinion. 11r.
Montenegro_ stated that it will be adequate, in the Highway Department's opinion.
Mr. Barksdale stated that if the developer is not required to improve the road,
and his plan is approved, will the next developer be required to do so.
Mr. Payne stated that if the two cases were to coincide, the next developer should
not be required to improve the road.
Mr. Peatross asked what the next step of improvement to the road is, in the Highway
Department's recommendation. Mr. Montenegro stated that Category III is the next step,
more base material.
Mr. Ron Carter, the applicant, was present. He stated that it doesn't appear that
the Highway Department has done any work on this site at all. He stated that he plans
to improve the road to a certain extent himself. Further, the Highway Department has
agreed to maintain the road for Mr. Langford. Mr. Jones stated that there should be a note
on the plat to that effect.
Mrs. Graves stated that a fifth condition of approval that the road be improved
for this subdivision only, should be required.
There were no public comments.
LANGFORD FINAL PLAT, continued
Mr. Peatross added that some improvement is not unreasonable, the developer should
be required to make the improvements that he has proposed.
Mr. Carter, the applicant, stated that he would place a note on the plat, that he
will improve the road to proper standards, if the Highway Department will not take the
responsbility to do so.
Mr. Payne stated that there should be a clause to the fifth condition that the road
be brought to Category I Frontage Road standards, the standards in which it was originally
built. He added that Frontage Road #1 is to be improved to Category II upon subdivision
of the remainder of the property.
Mr. Barksdale recommended approval of this plan subject to the four conditions
recommended by the staff and asked Mr. Montenegro to state the fifth condition clearly.
Mr. Montenegro stated that Frontage Road #1 is to be improved to and maintained at
Frontage Road, Category I standards. Frontage Road #1 to be improved to Category II
prior to the subdivision of the remainder of the property.
Col. Washington seconded the motion which carried unanimously with no further
discussion.
Mr. Gloeckner left the meeting.
dICKORY RIDGE SALES OFFICE SITE PLAN
Mr. Montenegro presented the staff report to the Commission noting the proposal,
history and location of this development. He stated that this site plan is in
conformance with the approved Planned Community plan, therefore the staff recommends
approval with the following conditions: 1) this approval does not apply to the plat
noted on this site plan 2) Engineering Department approval of the driveway, parking
and area surface treatment be obtained. Bruce Brown, the applicant, was present.
Mr. Gloeckner re-entered the meeting.
There were no public comments.
Col. Washington asked if Health Department approval has been received. Mr.
Montenegro told him that it has.
Mrs. Graves moved for approval of this site plan with the conditions recommended
by the staff. Col. Washington seconded the motion which carried unanimously.
There were no further comments or discussion.
ZMA-77-12 JAMES MAUPIN
Mr. Montenegro presented the staff report to the Commission noting the applicant's
request for rezoning from A-1 Agricultural to RPN/RS-1, one acre density. Mr.
Montenegro informed the Commission of the location, history and existing zoning of
this proposal. Mr. Montenegro stated that two houses are being built as a result of
the subdivision that was approved by the Commission on March 22, 1977. He noted that
this approval calls for 14 two -acre lots with five joint entrances off Route 691 and
three more off Route 684. Further, Mr. Montenegro noted that previous to this approval
- L --
ZMA-77-12 JAMES MAUPIN, continued
in March, 1972, ZMA-196 requested a rezoning of this property from A-1 to R-1 which
was denied by the Board of Supervisors after the Planning Commission had approved a
somewhat lower rezoning request from A-1 to RS-l.
Mr. Montenegro stated that the effective Comprehensive Plan calls for this site
to be developed at a medium density, 2.5 dwelling units per acre, however the proposed
plan calls for this area to remain agricultural in nature. Mr. Montenegro told the
Commission that the applicant's proposal is to develop 22 lots, average size at least
40,000 sq.ft., with a minimum of one utility which is public water. This plan calls for
the same number of driveways to enter from Route 691, one of which is more dangerous in
terms of its distance from Route 684 than any in the previous plat. It also calls for
one joint entrance off Route 684, this being a reduction from the three entrances shown
on the previous plat. Mr. Montenegro continued, stating that this proposal calls for
four fire pipes. He stated that the staff is concerned about the low visibility available
on Route 691 due to an almost blinding sun. With this in mind, the applicant has been
advised by the staff that a preferable access layout may involve the use of only three
main drives off of Route 691 serving all 22 lots. Mr. Montenegro told the Commission that
the applicant is agreeable to this and the Highway Department has approved it. He stated
that this alternative would reduce the number of curb cuts from six to three. The staff
this plan will reduce the road stripping which can occur under the presently approved
subdivision, reducing the number of entrances from 8 to 6. The staff recommends approval
of this rezoning with eight conditions of approval: 1) Fire Marshal approval of fire
fighting facilities, including the water source, hydrant locations and access facilities.
Mr. Montenegro stated that the Fire Marshal has informed him that he will be willing to
approve this development if the applicant will agree to provide 8" water lines all the
from the fire plug, rather than 6" lines as proposed, to provide the proper water
flow; 2) Engineering Department approval of private drive specifications, speaking
to easements, as the Fire Marshal is concerned about proper access facilities;
3) Highway Department approval of entrance locations and commercial entrances;
4) County Service Authority of the water lines; 5) All proposed common areas are to
remain undisturbed with the exception of the recreation areas and the driveways as noted
on the plan; 6) Written Health Department approval; 7) Only three driveways are to be
used, serving all lots in the development; 8) County Attorney's office approval of
maintenance agreement for the maintenance of all common areas of driveways.
Mrs. Graves asked if the road area is usually computed in the common open space.
Mr. Montenegro informed Mrs. Graves that the staff usually requires the applicant to
separate common area and roadways, but since these are not state roads, they are included
as part of the open space. Mrs. Graves asked how much open space there would be if the
roads were not included. Mr. Montenegro stated that there is not much open space without
the roads. Mrs. Graves asked if the two houses that are being built have entrance permits
from the Highway Department, and asked if they are now not allowed to enter. Mr.
Montenegro stated that is correct. He informed the Commission that as long as those lots
have acess to a state route, the Highway Department has the power to close those entrances,
Mr. Montenegro read to the Commission two letters received from the public
concerning this rezoning petition, one from Mr. Charles Mott and another from Carolyn
Wilcox. Mr. Montenegro noted that both letters expressed concern in opposition to this
development. Mr. Max Evans was present, representing Mr. Maupin. He presented his plan
to the Commission in explanation of his proposal.
9
ZMA-77-12 JAMES MAUPTN, continued
Mr. Peatross asked Mr. Evans if he had agreed in the staff report to have three
entrances rather than six. Mr. Evans said that upon further review, he had decided to
change this as more advantages are acquired with the six entrances rather than three.
He said that the main factor is the blinding sun in the late afternoon. He said that
if the entrances were reduced to three, an elaborate branching system in the open space
would be created, destroying the continuity of the open space. Further, he noted that
the clustering allows the addition of more lots absorbing growth in the Crozet area.
He stated that in this particular case, more fire protection and additional water lines
are provided that would not happen in this area if it is kept at this type of subdivision.
Mr. Tom Bachelor noted that the addition of 8 lots will provide for better
maintenance of this area. Further, Mr. Bachelor noted that Western Albemarle High School
has become very popular, everyone seems to be wanting to have their children educated at
this school. He stated that if the 14 lots go in there, they will go in on wells; the
chances of the water line being looped in the future will be reduced tremendously, and
in turn reducing the fire protection. He said that a loop line will provide the fire
protection for this development, the kind of protection that the growing Crozet area
needs.
Mr. White of the public, asked where the 8"water line goes. Mr. Evans explained.
Mr. White further suggested one entrance to serve this development rather than the five
entrances shown.
Mr. Wood of the public said that he had suggested the same thing, one entrance
rather than five, but the road was too narrow to accommodate it at that time. He
said that the road frontage could be made wider. Mr. Montenegro said that would probably
involve building a state road to state standards, which would leave very little open
space. Mr. Evans stated that one disadvantage in having one road would be that it would
create double frontage lots, which is not economical nor desirable. Mr. Montenegro noted
that another point in favor of having three entrances and serving these lots from the
interior, is that the Fire Marshal is concerned about the proper access to these houses,
since the fire plugs are in the interior.
Mr. Whitely of the public asked Mr. Montenegro what the Comprehensive Plan
suggests for the development of this area. He stated that he owns property adjacent to
this proposed development. Mr. Montenegro stated that the Comprehensive Plans calls for
this area to be developed in medium density, approximately 2.5 dwelling units per acre.
He said that this proposed development has 74 dwelling units, 2.5 dwelling units per acre,
540 vehicle trips per day, etc.
Mr. Tom Bachelor noted that the size of these lots are sizable in comparison
to the lots of one acre in Carrsbrook, Flordon and Ednam Forest.
Mr. Rainey of the public noted that he owns property directly across the road
from this proposed development. He said that his main concern is that the property of
this development is topographically above everything else in this area and jutts out
into the open space and agricultural area and slopes toward his property.
Mr. Charles Mott presented a petition to deny this rezoning request to the
Planning Commission and asked that it be presented to the Board of Supervisors for
consideration. He noted that he is an adjacent property owner.
M
ZMA-77-12 JAMES MAUPIN, continued
Mr. White, an adjacent propery owner, noted that his name was not on the petition.
He said that he feels possibly there is room for negotiation with this development.
ife said that he feels if the developer will agree to change the entrances to only
one, there would be less opposition from adjoining property owners.
Mr. Mott asked the Commission if in the revised plan of April, 1977, was it required
that the cluster building be pulled back, being more compact, closer to Crozet. Mr.
Montenegro stated that is correct, however, that plan is proposed, it is not adopted.
Mr. Mott stated further that he did not object to the previous plan of 14 lots, as
it did conform with existing zoning. He said that at that time he had expressed his concern
to the Commission as to the entrances off of Route 691. He said that he agrees with Mr.
White's suggestion of one entrance to this development, conforming with the existing zoning
laws. He urged the Commission to disapprove this application.
Mr. Peatross asked where the water is now. Mr. Bachelor said that it is well and
septic and if these wells go in, there will be very little chance to loop the water lines.
Mrs. Graves asked if the rejection by the applicant of the suggestion for three
entrances, change Mr. Montenegro's and the staffs' recommendations for approval of this
proposed development. Mr. Montenegro stated that the suggestion for three entrances has
many advantages, including better maintenance of the road. He stated that he would recommend
approval subject to this condition.
Mr. Gloeckner added that this is probably a better plan, more open spaces and fewer
driveways; possibly the applicant will be willing to reduce the entrances to three. He
said that in its present form he would be opposed to it, however if a plan were presented
showing the three entrances to acquire the proper fire protection, he stated that he would
prefer this over the standard type subdivision.
Mrs. Graves said that if one entrance were used with one internal road, it would not
be classified as an RPN. Mr. Montenegro stated that is correct, it would not be practical,
a variance would be required for every lot.
Mr. Barksdale stated that the Fire Marshal will have to approve the plan with three
entrances if the staff requires it. Mr. Montenegro stated that it would be approved if there
are access areas within the common area for the fire trucks. Mr. Gloeckner stated that if
this were done, a network of drives would still be created to the fire plugs through the
common area. He stated that he suggests the three entrances that the Planning staff has
proposed.
Mr. Evans stated that the drives shown now, each serves serves four lots. He stated
that if the number of drives were reduced the number of lots would be served with fewer lots,
resulting in a more branching system; with one drive entrance on Route 684 is the safest
point along Route 684 serving those two lots. Further, he noted that the entrance shown
approximately 275' from the intersection would serve two lots, each of the other drives
serving four lots, except the end entrance. He stated that each drive provides access to
the fire hydrants. He said that his objection is to preserve as much open space as possible,
both along the road and within the development.
Mr. Carr stated that he is not sure that this area is ready for any greater density
than what is proposed. Mr. Gloeckner said that the fire protection is of concern to him.
'Y7-
ZMA-77-12 JAMES MAUPIN, continued
Mr. Barksdale suggested that this item be deferred until the planning staff and
developer could work out the problems that are existing. Mrs. Graves said that if
it were rezoned to RPN/RS-1, the density could still be limited, it doesn't have to be
as many as 22 lots. Mr. Barksdale said that it would not be feasible to run a water
line if that were done.
Mr. Barksdale moved that this item be deferred in order that the applicant can
work with the -,staff and the'Fire Marshal to prepare a plan acceptable to all parties
involved, until the Planning Commission's meeting of July 12, 1977.
Mr. Peatross commented on the motion, that he feels it should be more specific
as to what should be required of the applicant in accordance with the staff's
recommendations. He stated that he personally favors this plan with three entrances
which is a matter of lining the hydrants with the lots, etc. Mr. Jones agreed,
suggesting that the motion be accepted with the eight conditions as listed by the staff.
Mr. Carr asked Mr. Evans how wide the open space is. Mr. Evans stated 25'. He stated
that if branched roads are required, he can reduce the open space; the quality of the
open space will be lost when the drives are constructed.
Mr. Montenegro added a ninth condition of approval for the Fire Marshal, that
no unit may closer than 150' from any adjacent dwelling unit. He also added a statement
to condition #1 as follows: an 8" water line is required going back from the water
nearest the fire plug up to Route 684 and dedicated to the Albemarle County Service
Authority.
The motion carried unanimously, with no further discussion.
ZMA-77-13 FRANK KESSLER AND JOE W. WRIGHT
Mr. Montenegro presented the staff report to the Commission noting the applicant's
proposal, location and history of this development. He noted that this application is
for a 62-acre tract presently zoned A-1, requesting RPN/A-1 zoning. Mr. Montenegro noted
that the proposed Comprehensive Plan calls for this area to remain agricultural in nature.
He said that the applicant's proposal calls for 31 residential lots, average size,
approximately 60,000 sq.ft., minimum. He said that this plan calls for 29 lots to be
served by two roads each entering from Route 743. Mr. Montenegro stated that these
roads have been sighted by the applicant and the Highway Department; the other two lots
will be served by joint entrances.
Mr. Montenegro said that under normal circumstances this proposed layout would
be acceptable to the staff, however, in this instance, the proposed subdivision lies
within the South Rivanna River Re-servoir's immediate drainage area. This fact restricts
the development to road building no closer than 500' to the streams on the site and
no structures nor septic facilities any closer than 200' from these same streams.
Furthermore, no construction of roads may take place on slopes exceeding 15%. Mr.
Montenegro told the Commission that the applicant hays requested that approval be granted
subject to whatever restrictions may be imposed in the future, in regards to the
reservoir ordinance. Mr. Montenegro stated that the staff recommends approval of this
proposal subject to seven conditions: 1) any subdivision plat will include enough
.1
j
ZMA-77-13 FRANK KESSLER AND JOE W. WRIGHT, continued
space to maintain the required two -acre density; 2) approval is subject to the
reservoir ordinance, to protect the South Fork Rivanna River Reservoir and to any
controls that may be subsequently enacted to protect the quality of such water;
3) Written Health Department approval; 4) Highway Department approval of entrance
locations and specifications; 5) Engineering and Highway Department approval of internal
roads; 6) County Attorney's office approval of maintenance agreements for the maintenance
of the common areas; and 7) All proposed common areas are to remain undisturbed with the
exception of the recreation area noted on the plan.
Mr. Evans, the applicant, was present.
There were no public comments.
Mr. Gloeckner stated that he feels this to be a very good plan, providing all the
requirements of the County; the moritorium ordinance shouldn't affect this plan, in his
opinion. Mr. Carr agreed, stating that he has no objections to the approval of this plan
subject to the conditions of the reservoir ordinance.
Mr. Payne noted that there is a possibility that the present ordinance will be
continued; it is important that the developer realize that he will be subject to that
possibility. Mr. Evans stated that he is aware of this possibility and is prepared to
take an alternative if this prevails.
Mr. Barksdale motioned that this plan be approved with the conditions recommended
by the staff, combining condition #1 and 2. Mr. Gloeckner seconded the motion.
Mrs. Graves added that a plan for the active recreation area should be submitted.
Mr. Montenegro stated that he would require this of Mr. Evans.
The motion carried six to one, Mrs. Graves dissenting.
There were no further comments or discussion.
NEW BUSINESS
Mr. Carr stated that Mrs. Graves and Mr. Peatross have consented to serve on the
Neighborhood Urban Planning Committee for the Comprehensive Rlan.
He informed Mr. Tucker that Mrs. Graves and Mr. Peatross will have to be provided with some
direction as to serving on this committee.
Mr. Gloeckner asked who is drawing up the guidelines to protect the reservoir.
Mr. Payne stated that he has drafted a proposed ordinance, in which the Board of Supervisors
found to be inadequate in terms of content .
The meeting adjourned at 10:30 p.m.
Ill't Ai. 4c�
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
Secretary