HomeMy WebLinkAbout06 18 79 PC MinutesM
June 18, 1979
The Albemarle County Planning Commission conducted a work session
on Monday, June 18, 1979, 4:00 p.m., Board Room, County Office Building,
Charlottesville, Virginia. Those members present were Col. William Washington,
Chairman; Mr. Layton McCann; Mr. James Skove; Mrs. Norma Diehl, Vice -Chairman;
Mr. James Huffman; and Mr. Charles Vest. Absent were Mrs. Joan Graves; Dr. James
Moore; Mr. Kurt Gloeckner; and Mr. Tim Lindstrom, ex-Officio. Other officials
present were Mr. Robert Tucker, Director of Planning; Mr. Douglas Eckel, Senior
Planner; and Mr. Frederick Payne, Deputy County Attorney.
Col. Washington called the meeting to order after establishing a quorum
was present.
Mr. Tucker pointed to the map with the detailed water lines and installations
and improvements in conjunction with the Capital Improvements Program.
Mr. Keeler said that Priority 1 ( for one hydrant on Tax Map 62A1,
with 400 feet of 6" line for an estimated cost of $6800 to serve 189 lots )
would benefit the entire system in this area and lots other than those served.
Hydrants have been located in previous years in all cases. He said that of the
priorities listed ( see attached sheet ) staff recommends funding for only priority
#1.
Mr. Ira Cortez, County Fire Official, said that he closely reviewed
this list that morning and the remaining priorities don't justify the dollar expense
in view of the fact that many areas in the county do not have public water available.
Mr. McCann suggested appropriating no additional monies if there is Troney
left over from the hydrant appropriation from previous years.
Col. Washington said that he feels the Commission will still want
to review the School Board portion of the Capital Improvements Program once
they have completed the Education section of the CIP.
Mr. Skove questioned if it is appropriate for the Commission to recommend
to the Board of Supervisors that the Board proceed with funding for the Crozet
Interceptor with EPA funding.
Mr. Tucker said it might be better for the Commission to recommend
the Board consider alternate funding.
Mr. Skove replied that it is possible the EPA will never get around to
funding the interceptor, or at least not until the 1980's. If growth in the
Crozet area is encouraged, the interceptor is necessary.
Mr. Tucker said that tertiary treatment plants could be an alternative
to the interceptor.
Mrs. Diehl agreed that she would like to stress alternative methods.
The Commission agreed it would take action on the CIP, with the
exception of the Education Department requests, on the following day.
,�56
Proposed textual change in proposed zoning ordinance:
Mr. Tucker noted that the staff recommends the addition of 13.2.2,
with regard to site plans, in the draft ordinance.
Mr. Payne stated that this is a means of accommodating those people
when a site plan is not really needed; this provision is infrequently used.
Mr. McCann moved that 13.2.2 be included in the proposed text.
Mr. Huffman seconded the motion, which carried unanimously, with
no discussion.
( See attached sheet for addition. )
Mr. Tucker then addressed various alternatives for preparing the
proposed zoning map:
1. Reestablish existing zoning with a comparable district from the proposed zoning
text;
2. Use the adopted comprehensive plan's land use plans as the basis for
establishing the proposed zoning map;
3. Use the more detailed urban neighborhood, community, and village land use
plans ( although presently not adopted ) as proposed by each committee as
the basis for the proposed zoning map;
4. Defer work on the proposed zoning map until the neighborhood, community,
and village land use plans have been adopted as part of the County's
comprehensive plan.
He stated that the third alternative is what has been followed by the
staff because it gives a more definitive basis for making land use decisions in
terms of zoning while providing the most expeditious means for preparing the zoning
map. However, after the previous work session he suggested the commission
considering alternative four, though it would add one to two months to the zoning
ordinance process.
Col. Washington said that he would like to get the zoning text
published so a public hearing can be held; however he would like this text
to have a map to go along with it. He said it would be possible to complete
the map in the Rural Residential and Agricultural -Forestry areas. The villages
and urban areas could be done after completion of the neighborhood plans. That
way the map could be completed and adopted at a later date. In Col. Washington's
opinion the biggest issues are the AF, RR, and CVN designations on the map.
Mr. Skove established that the neighborhood plans go through a public
hearing process in order to amend the Comprehensive Plan.
Mrs. Diehl liked the idea of dealing with a zoning map in totality.
Mr. McCann said that prior to any public hearings on the text
and map, the Commission should have a finished product to present.
Col. Washington suggested advertising the various neighborhoods,
communites and villages for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for the
upcoming Monday's.
451
•
h
F�•
rt
W
1r
1.2
N
1-
A
F3
Fa
F+
M
C�
GAD
C
OD
D
~
b
7C
x
x
b
•
t�
H
C
t
"
r
61
01.
N
01
01
a�
a1
O�
a�
c3D
C
to
H
m
r
•
O
y
hi
t"
FJ
F-
F+
r: A
v
N
J
O
N
Ut
N
0
t,
'yam
o
0
In
O
O
Ut
O
Ut
O
Om
y
�O
H
m
it
m
It
ID
m
CD
(DD
m
(D
(DD
m
w
ct
rtcct
rt,
rror
R
cct
rror
R
cD
H
z
tzj
%o N
F•+
F••
N
Ut
F+
1-+
(/1
fA
0 M
H
a� a+
to
w
w
A
cn
0
w
ON
O rn
z
O
W
J
O
O
- (n
N
Ut
OD
Dl rr
W
fr o
O
UI
O
O
0
0
0
0
rr r•
y
W \
o
O
O
\
O
O
O
O
y
o m
\
\
\
r
\
\
\
\
ro a
r
J
N
to
%o
o
A
a%
Aa
{A
m rt
0 0
F,
O
N
CD
r
OD
w
w
t{ cD
O
Co
N
O
O
w
O
P.
M
a
y
a+
D,
r
O o
O
rr 0
z
rr
H
m
F+
H 0
O
F=
N
w
r
F+
O
< M
o
A
J
A
N
ul
J
M
F+
%0
m
C
air
ft
W
z
y
N
rt H
N M H
H
iP En H
W H
H n H
H En
H H
rt "o Or rr H
W O
N- H 3
3
: G 3
cD 3
m 0 3
m 0
m 3
:r H. H P. 3
ICf DI
v O N
W
3 to
3 m
b G En
b F✓
a fn
cD a 0 0 N N
ww
m e
m
wm
°e
pi 0 a
w
a
ZI w
a rt w
a
Al w
tr0 PU X rt
0 F�
0 0 F+
r
a rr 1-r
3 r
0 r
n 0
0 r
m 3 O 3. 1 r
to F+
3 0 F✓
H
1r
W F+
W a r
m 3
tD H
3 rt a to m r
H
N xi
rt
3 3
01
cn
m to a
W a
a rt r
0
= 0 r
0 .a
W a
M z N
F, b
3' .
N
a J
3 0
1
a1 O
N N
F'• a a 0 07
rob
a G r
In
E a J
O
w '3.' N
O a
N cn
rt 3 P. H =
m
i+
a o
�I+
a N
o a
v�l+
m a ►3 < rt
b
C O
w cn
rr a l+
o
N H vi
I+
I+
x
m x
a rt I+
Hf
fD 3
a M
= r I+
tr
M
rt N m N M
O
O M
m
m
m
/•� O M
m rr
cD CD
tO 1-+ O m -
m
a
H
3 m
M
M W m
rt
r- H m
m£
m rt
0 3
n
*
O. rt
m
a H. m
< ct
O
P. r• rr
3 H
H
m 0
3 0 m
m rt
rr m
m
rr
O
S F, O cn a rt
m O b In a
rr
CO m
M
m 0
b
3
M
so LG
0
1
n o 0
ro
M
o w z rt b
N
H M
£
a o+
3 G M
m
ON
rr w E f••
N
< A
m H
N
O ON
0 _
m H
N m
P :
3 r• rt m 3
IO
1
•
0 0
m m ON
:
0 :
m
H rt cn
: H
-
m 3 m E w W
H
a
am
w
a`w0r
(D
a£
o a
N cr
0£
5
w rr
m ob
rt
ro
O a
rt
H rr
In m
m a
rt P.
rt m
G H O O H m
N-
rt
m rt
m
H• m
O H
r• rt
m H
m H
CT• rt F•• m m
O
•
!A m
H
< H
I+
f] O m
H m
H
a
O
H
(D
r
O O H
N
H. M£ rt a m
1-'•
G a
F+ ',d
N N•
< P. H. U) 3 (n
r
H'
P.
m 3
It F••
H. O
H- 3
W m r a
cn
r F•
3
H 3
m m
rr a P.
3 a
3 m
71 F 1 rt - a
0 3
m
m m
rr
;l
m a
m
N• a O 3
O m
''C
of
P. m
a
0 Ln a n a
w
+
W
1-' f•-
0 0
-
-
a
O
^ Art a
a
3
a 3
M E
a•
3
£
ra a a. :11 H<
•
3
M O
0
3
1— m
a
3
r m H a
ro
m
O
m w
N
H. rr
O cn cn r
m
(D
U) a
(n
° 3 E
H
E
m 3' G t-• C• <
ct
O
r
C
m m
3
m
3 m b 03 H m
�IYr►'
(-)
H
r Ir
E H
-• m
'IQ
m
rr b : O In
H
3
O a
M<
to
m
,n a
O H
fY, H
rt<
3
H.
r
m
F•• 3 0 O
O O H£ ;v
N
a
rt
o a
m
a n
E
o
3 rrrra
0
I+
H�u
0 3•
0
H
m rt a •-3
a
:F•
q
O
rm
O
m
Lb rt m 3 ,7
r a
G H
a
r
0 O H a H-
-
►�
E H
m H-
Q,0
w
G cn
a
m<
3
m IV
3 N r:C
r
rr t7
O
rr m
m M
N m
H
a
rt o r• O E
W
m H
a
H
m
H.
f•• 3 0 t••
=
fj P.
a
O
0
c
(i
3 m a 1•.
<
M
8
m
O
ka 1 r
X
m
�
G
1-••
H
3
13.0 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
13.1 INTENT
There is a mutual responsibility between the County of Albemarle
and the developer to develop land in an orderly manner.
The purpose of this section is to encourage innovative and
creative design and facilitate use of the most advantageous
techniques and highest standards in the development of land in
Albemarle County; and to insure that land be used in a manner which
is efficient, harmonious with neighboring property and in accordance
with the adopted Comprehensive Plan for Albemarle County.
13.2 APPLICATION
13.2.1 A site development plan shall be submitted for any construction, use,
change in use or other development in all zoning districts; provided
that no such plan shall be required for the following:
A. The construction or change in occupancy of any single-family
detached dwelling unit which is located upon a tract or parcel
whereon are located or proposed to be located an aggregate of
two (2) or fewer such units;
B. The location of a two-family dwelling on any lot or parcel not
occupied by any other dwellings;
C. Any accessory structure to a single-family or two-family dwelling;
D. Any agricultural activity except as otherwise provided in 4.15.
E. Any change in or expansion of a use except where the sale of
gasoline is involved; provided that: (a) such change or expansion
does not occasion additional parking under the requirements of
this ordinance; (b) no additional ingress/egress or change in
ingress/egress is recommended by Virginia Department of Highways
and Transportation based on intensification of use; (c) no
additional ingress/egress or alteration of existing engress/egress
is proposed,
13.2.2 The foregoing notwithstanding, the Planning Commission may waive the
requirement of a site plan in a particular case upon a finding that the
requirement of such plan would not forward the purposes of this ordinance
or otherwise serve the public interest; provided that no such waiver
shall be made until the Commission has considered the recommendation of
the Director of Planning. The Director may recommend approval, approval
with conditions, or denial of such waiver. In the case of conditional
approval, the Director in his recommendation shall state the relationship
of the recommended condition to the provisions of this section. No
condition shall be imposed which could not be imposed through the
application of the regulations of Section 13.0.
M
The Commission reached a consensus to advertise public hearings
for the communities, etc. to be amendments to the Comprehensive Plan prior to
working on the map and presentation of the text and map to the public.
Mr. Tucker advised the Commission of the cost of a full page,
both colored and black and white, in the Daily Progress for the zoning map.
The cost of the color was $850 and $650 for the black and white photo.
The Commission unanimously approved a black and white photograph of the
map for the Daily Progress.
With no further business, the Commission adjourned at 5:35 p.m.
ash