HomeMy WebLinkAbout11 28 79 PC MinutesNovember 28, 1979
The Albemarle County Planning Commission conducted a meeting on Wednesday,
November 28, 1979, 4:00 p.m., Board Room, County Office Building, Charlottesville,
Virginia. Those members present were Col. William R. Washington, Chairman; Mrs. Norma
Diehl, Vice -Chairman; Mr. Layton McCann; Mr. Charles Vest; Mr. James Skove ; and
Mr. Kurt Gloeckner. Absent were Mr. James Huffman; Dr. James Moore; Mrs. Joan Graves;
and Mr. Tim Lindstrom, ex-Officio. Other officials present were Mr. Robert W. Tucker,
Director of Planning; Mr. Ronald S. Keeler, Assistant Director of Planning; and
Mr. George R. St. John, County Attorney.
Col. Washington called the meeting to order after establishing that a
quorum was present.
ZMA-79-42. RETIREMENT HOMES OF VIRGINIA, INC. has petitioned the
Board of Supervisors to rezone 35 acres from RPN/R-1 to RPN/R-2.
Property is located on the south side of Route 250 West and is
commonly known as EDNAM. Tax Map 60, Parcel 28A, Samuel Miller
Magisterial District.
Mr. Keeler presented the staff report, noting the letter from Mr. George
Worthington, the letter from Mr. Robert Bain of the consulting architectural firm,
and the letter from the Fire Official.
Mr. Lee Middleditch, attorney representing the contract purchasers,
introducted the members of the architectural firm of Sherertz, Franklin, and
Shaffner; and Mr. Ogburn from Retirement Homes of Virginia. He stated that all
were present to answer any questions that might arise.
Mr. Ogburn said that it is the intention to do the best possible job
and make the project commensurate with the area.
Mr. Gardner discussed the concept of the project, noting that this offers
an alternative lifestyle to older individuals where many services are provided.
He addressed the nursing care facility that is planned.
Mr. Bain, architect, explained the proposed site development concept
noting the central facilities and higher density type development. He said that the
age span of individuals living there has been considered in the design concept. He
said that the existing dwelling on the property will be used for administrative
offices. Additionally, he pointed out that there will be extensive landscaping.
The engineer from John McNair said that the runoff control ordinance
and soil erosion ordinance will be employed during and after construction to
minimize runoff. He felt that the erosion problems that have been experienced in
the area will be less than currently exist after this project, noting that water
will be released at a slower rate. He felt that the runoff to Ednam Village will
be reduced as a result of the ponds.
Dr. Twyman, President of Ednam Village Homeowners Association, was concerned
about denuding the hill and the runoff that will result.
Mrs. Suzanne Barry, a resident of Ednam Forest, pointed to the seven major
entrances in this area and felt the Commission should consider the possible Birdwood
development impact in conjunction with this project. She said that many accidents
C-24-
have occurred along this roadway, and stated that the winter sun makes it
almost impossible to see. Mrs. Barry felt that the Commission should
consider the safety of those travelling the road at this time as well as the
safety of the future residents.
Mr. Bain said that the owners have been working closely with the
Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation. He said that the owner/developer
proposes to widen Route 250 along this stretch and proposes a deceleration lane as
well. The sight distance will be vastly improved. The proposed access, as
recommended by the Highway Department will be directly across from the Farmington
entrance. The banks along Route 250 will also be cut back to have better sight
distance.
Mr. Gardner noted that the new traffic along Route 250 will have little
impact during the peak hours.
Mrs. Peggy Delmaley, a resident of Ednam Forest, expressed concern for
the increased density in the area as well as the 100-bed nursing facility.
the
Mr. Bain said that Anursing care facility will be a T-shaped, three storey
building with two floorsdedicated to 50 beds each. He said that a tremendous attempt
has been made to de -institutionalize the building, inside and outside.
Col. Washington noted that nothing has happened to the rezoning petition
along Route 29 North that was very similar in nature to this proposal. He said
that he had understood that there is a licensing problem with that project and
wondered if this proposal would be likewise affected.
Mr. Middleditch said that he understood that the proposal on Route 29
North had failed because there was no buyer.
Mr. Gardner said that Ed.nam has all the necessary approvals for a 50-bed
facility, and explained the series of applications that would be necessary for
the remainder of the proposal.
Col. Washington then questioned drainage problems in the area.
Mr. Keeler replied that the drainage plan for the proposal has been submitted
and the resulting drainage under the proposal will probably be less than existing
drainage.
Col. Washington then questioned the earth moving and possible erosion
during the construction period.
The engineer from John McNair said that there will be a minimum of earth
moving during the construction phase.
Mr. Ogburn pointed out that the soil erosion plans must be approved prior
to construction commencement.
Col. Washington noted that the soil in that area is of a nature that is
susceptible to erosion.
Mr. Bain pointed out that a great portion of the site will remain
undeveloped.
6;�/qr-
Mr. Marion Kellogg, the current owner, noted that there has always been
a drainage problem in Ednam Village and he feels this problem will be corrected
to a degree with these plans.
Mr. McCann said that all the questions he had regarding the proposal
have been answered.
Mrs. Diehl established that one building will be set back as recommended
at the Site Review Meeting.
Mr. Ogburn discussed the mini -bus system that will be employed as part
of the proposal at the request of Mrs. Diehl.
Mrs. Diehl questioned what will happen if the applicant's certificate
of need is not approved.
Mr. Keeler said that the county would probably be faced with another
rezoning. He noted that the staff recommendation is based on the impact of this
particular application, and any approval is for this particular concept.
Mr. Skove agreed that the Birdwood development will have quite an impact
on the area, however saw no way to address that situation as part of this proposal.
Col. Washington closed the public hearing.
Mrs. Diehl determined that the Commission will review a site plan.
Mr. Skove pointed out that the experts from the Highway Department and
Engineering Department say the proposal will work and therefore he supports the
concept.
Mrs. Diehl advised the applicant that at the time of site plan preparation
and review by the Commission he should be aware of the history of poor drainage in
the area.
is
Mr. McCann agreed, however pointed out itAgood a third lane is being
added to the road.
Col. Washington agreed that the runoff problems in the area should be
of major consideration to the applicant.
Mr. Gloeckner moved approval of the reauest subject to the following
conditions:
1. Approval is for 255 dwelling units and a 100-bed nursing care facility.
Dwelling locations and types shall be as shown on the approved plan.
2. Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation approval of commercial
entrances and road improvements as shown on the approved plan.
3. County Engineer approval of internal roads and parking drainage, grading
plans, and impoundment dam.
4. Albemarle County Service Authority approval of water and sewer plans including
booster station and other apprutenances;
5. Fire Offical approval of fire hydrant locations and fire flow requirements,
emergency access provisions, and handicapped parking;
o'7
6. Approval of all appropriate state, local, and federal agencies prior to
certificate of occupancy;
7. Occupancy shall be limited to persons aged 62 years and older. For the
purposes of this condition, if one spouse is aged 62 years or older, the other
spouse shall be considered 62 years of age.
Mr. McCann seconded the motion, which carried unanimously, with no
additional discussion.
With no further business, the Commission adjourned at 5:30 p.m.
9