Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNovember 1974November 5, 1974 This was a regular meeting of the Albemarle County Planning Commission held on November 4, 1974, at 7:30 p.m. in the auditorium of Piedmont Virginia Community College, Charlottesville, Virginia. Those members present were Mr. David Carr, Chairman; Mr. Clifton McClure, Vice - Chairman; Mr. Roy Barksdale; Mr. Peter Easter; Mr. Jack Rinehart; Mr. Wilbur Tinsley; Dr. James Sams; Mr. Louis Staley; Mrs. Ellen Craddock; and Mr. Lloyd Wood, ex-officio. Mr. Carr called the meeting to order and established that a quorum was present. The first consideration of the evening was the approval of the administration sub- division plats. Mr. Tucker pointed out that there was a pre-existing 50' right-of-way and they were asking for 24 acre lots. The motion was made and it was seconded by Mr. Easter that this be approved. It carried unanimously. Milk Stop site plan This deferred item from the meeting on October 21, 1974, showed that the applicant had moved the entrance by providing stacking lane spaces for five (5) automobiles. The situation has been reviewed by the County Engineers and is subject to approval by the Virginia Highway Department. Mrs. Craddock questioned the plans for landscaping. Mr. Steve Phillips represented the applicant and suggested that landscaping would not be an objection to his client. It was noted that the staff recommendi approval. A motion was made by Mr. McClure and seconded by Mr. Rinehart to approve the Milk Stop site plan conditioned upon final highway department approval and staff approval of landscape plan. The motion carried unanimously. SP-421. Fred W. Scott, Jr., has petitioned the Albemarle County Board of Super- visors to locate a private airport on 487.11 acres zoned A-1 Agricultural. Property is situated on the south side of State Route 692, about 1� miles west of Crossroads. Property is further described as County Tax Map 86, Parcels 13, 13A, 25 and 26. Mr. Tucker read the staff report and the matter was opened to public hearing. The applicant, Mr. Scott, presented his intent and read a portion of the letter with which he had petitioned the Board of Supervisors. He noted that his petition had met the requirements of the FAA. Mr. Lawrence Randolph, an adjoining landowner, presented his objections, citing his fear of an eventual commercial operation, property depreciation, and fear of intrusion of his peace and tranquillity. Mr. Sutherland, another adjacent landowner, was concerned about the proximity of landings to his property. Mr. R. B. Rogers, a third adjoining landowner, requested severe controls on the Special Permit. Mr. Rinehart suggested that no jets be allowed at the airport and the number of landings and take -offs be limited. Fiealso suggested that the Planning Com- mission should review the situation in 3-5 years. At this point he made a motion to approve the special permit. Mr. Tucker pointed out that a special permit runs with the land in case the property is sold. Mr. Easter requested that the permit be limited to Mr. Scott only and seconded the motion. Mrs. Craddock, Mr. Rinehart, Mr. Easter and Mr. Staley suggested further conditions for approval. After further discussion, the motion to approve was made by Mr. Rinehart and se- conded by Mrs. Craddock; it carried unanimously with the following conditions: 1. Approval from the Division of Aeronautics of the State Corporation Commission; 2. Approval from FAA; 3. This airport be limited to the private use of the applicant and restricted to one base aircraft; 4. Review every five (5) years; 5. Grass runway only; 6. Total of 100 operations, i.e. 50 take -offs, 50 landings; 7. Runway not to exceed 3,500 linear feet; 8. Permit issued to applicant only and be non -transferable; and 9. No runway lights permitted. The Planning Commission will recommend to the Board of Supervisors that it be ac- cepted with the above conditions. SP-424. John R. Crawford has applied for a Special Permit to place a mobile home on 11.26 acres zoned A-1 Agricultural. Property is situated in a subdivision known as Quandarry Farms. Property is further described as County Tax Map 103, Parcel 16E. Scottsville Magisterial District. Mr. Tucker read the staff report and the matter was opened to public hearing. Mr. Crawford, the applicant, pointed out that the trailer would not be visible from State Route 727. There was no public opposition. Dr. Sams questioned the presence of other mobiles in the area. Mrs. Craddock wondered if it would be visible to other neighbors and was informed that perhaps one neighbor would be able to see it, but only in the winter months. Dr. Sams moved for approval, but questioned Mr. Crawford about the well. Mr. Tinsley seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. The Planning Commission will recommend to the Board of Supervisors that it be ac- _J cepted with the following conditions: 1. County Health Department approval of individual well and septic tank to serve the mobile home; 2. County Building Official approval; 3. 100 foot setback from Route 727; 4. Screening from Route 727; 5. Location to be determined by the Zoning Department; 6. Skirting around mobile home base of mobile home to ground level; 7. This permit be issued to the son of the applicant and be non -transferable; and B. Time limit of five years. SP-427. Norbin M. Ladd has applied for a Special Permit to place a mobile home on 2+ acres zoned A-1 Agricultural. Property is situated on the south side of Route 647 near Cismont. Property is further described as County Tax Map 65, Parcel 71. Rivanna Magisterial District. Mr. Tucker read the staff report and the matter was opened to public hearing. Mr. Ladd, the applicant, spoke for himself. Mr. Charles Carr, an ajoining landowner opposed the petition due to the nature of the right-of-way. He also inquired about the general purpose of the mobile home. Mr. Tinsley questioned the storage situation, on which the petition is based. Mr. Easter also pointed out that the intent seemed to be different from the actual petition. Mr. Rinehart asked if there were other mobile homes in the area. It was noted that there were twenty-one (21) petitions opposed to Mr. Ladd's petition. Mr. Tinsley moved that the meeting be closed to public hearing and the special per- mit be denied; Mrs. Craddock seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous to recommend to the Board of Supervisors that the permit be denied. SP-430. Rush Estates (Robert Patterson and Bernard Schwab) have petitioned the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors to locate a central well on 35.25 acres zoned A-1 Agricultural. Property is situated on the east side of State Route 708, about 1 mile north of its intersection with State Route 710. Property is further de- scribed as County Tax Map 74, Parcels 8 and 9. Samuel Miller Magisterial District. Mr. Tucker read the staff report and the petition was opened to public hearing. Mr. and Mrs. Ernest Banister, adjoining landowners, opposed the petition on the grounds that they felt their water supply would be seriously threatened. Mr. Banister questioned why a geologist had not been consulted. Mr. Rinehart replied that a geologist could give merely an indication of where water actually is. Mr. Tucker pointed out that there was no need for the services of a geologist, since a geologist cannot guarantee water to anyone. He also reported that a central well would be more efficient from an engineering standpoint than four individual wells would be. Mr. Higgenson, a second adjacent landowner, pointed out that his springs were dry and wanted to be informed about the plans for a water storage tank. Mr. Schwab, one of the applicants, said he had researched the matter in such a way to feel that 4 gallons/minute would be sufficient water to suuply the four residences. The meeting was closed to public hearing. Mrs. Craddock sited a personal experience which pointed to the possibility that 4 gallons/minute would be insufficient. Mr. Rinehart stated that the requirements are 1 gallon/minute per dwelling. There- fore, this permit could jeopardize the property owners. He said that he was not opposed to the central well, rather against the amount of water that seemed to be available. Mrs. Craddock moved the petition to be denied on grounds of insufficient water for four dwellings. Mr. Rinehart seconded the motion. Dr. Sams asked if additional storage facilities would modify her motion. Mr. Carr asked the Commission if they need more information relating to storage. Mrs. Craddock amended her motion to state that the petitions would be deferred until storage could be defined. Mr. Rinehart seconded this motion. The petition is deferred until November 18, 1974. SP-431. Stockton Creek has petitioned the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors to locate a professional office and craft shop on 11.51 acres zoned A-1 Agricultural. Property is situated on the south side of Route 250 West, at the intersection of State Route 690. Property is further described as County Tax Map 70, Parcel 15A, part thereof. Samuel Miller Magisterial. District. Mr. Tucker read the staff report and the matter was opened to public hearing. Mr. Tyler spoke for the applicant. He told the Commission that no rent would be paid, rather improvements made on the barn. Mrs. Craddock inquired if this were a commercial outlet. Mr. Rinehart stated that he saw the operation as an industrial area due to the com- bination of buildings contractors and architects rather than a rural operation. He re- quested that the petition be re -written so that no equipment would be stored outside. Dr. Sams suggested that the petition would not fit the definition of a craft shop even if the intent were reworded. Mr. Easter requested a definition of professional office. Mr. McClure said that the petition would not conform to zoning even with rewording of intent. Mr. Tinsley said that it seemed to be a request for two businesses incorporated into one general intent, and thus feels that a separation should be made. Mr. McClure proposed to defer the action by the Commission and suggested that Stockton Creek work with the County Attorney to make the necessary adjustments, if possible. Mr. Rinehart seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. SP-433. Peyton G. and Juanita B. Taylor have petitioned the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors to locate a two-family dwelling on 1.64 acres zoned A-1 Agricultural. Property is situated on the south side of Route 250 East, in Milton Heights subdi- vision. Property is further described as County Tax Map 79B, Parcel B4. Rivanna Magisterial District. Mr. Tucker read the staff report and the matter was opened to public hearing. Mr. Taylor, the applicant spoke for himself. There was no public opposition. Mr. Tinsley asked if this would be an "up and down" duplex. Mr. Rinehart asked if it appeared on the outside to be a single family dwelling, but learned that there were no deed restrictions. Mr. Carr questioned if all adjoining property owners were notified and was informed that they were. Mr. Tinsley suggested that the special permit be limited to Mr. Taylor only. Mr. Rinehart recommended no external structural changes with the matter to be re- viewed in five years. Dr. Sams noted that no one seemed to be concerned and moved for approval of the petition. Mr. Easter seconded the motion. The Planning Commission, with a vote of 7-2, recommended approval with the fol- lowing conditions: 1. Minimum of four (4) parking spaces provided; 2. Building official approval; 3. Health Department approval; and 4. No external structural alterations. Old Business: Mr. Carr asked the members of the Commission to review the minutes of the Planning Commission through July 29, 1974, before the next regular session. New Business: Mr. Tucker asked that a resolution of intent be adopted to amend the county zoning ,l ordinance to include a site development plan ordinance. The Commission requested that they be provided with a copy of the site plan ordi- nance which includes requirements for site plans. Mr. McClure made a motion to adopt the above resolution; it was seconded by Mr. Rinehart. The motion carried. It was asked by Mrs. Craddock that the staff put on the agenda a discussion of mobile home units. Mr. Easter moved that the meeting be adjourned; Mrs. Craddock seconded. Jo n L. Humphrey, sec.jetary 9 71 November 12, 1974 This was a work session of the Albemarle County Planning Commission held on November 12, 1974, 7:30 p.m. in the County Office Building, Court Square, Charlottesville, Virginia. Those members present were Mr. David Carr, Chairman; Mr. Clifton McClure, Vice - Chairman; Mr. Roy Barksdale; Mr. Peter Easter; Mr. Jack Rinehart; Mr. Louis Staley; Dr. James Sams; and Mrs. Ellen Craddock. Mr. Carr called the meeting to order and established that a quorum was present. The first item of business was the approval of the minutes of the Planning Commis- sion Meetings and Work Session through July 29. The minutes of June loth were deferred until certain items could be clarified. The minutes of June 24th were approved subject to two changes. Final approval was given for the minutes of July 8th and July 29th. The minutes of June loth, August 19th, August 26th, September 3rd, and September 9th will be discussed on the November 18, 1974 meeting. Mr. Easter reminded the secretary to have a standard phrase to use when a member of the Planning Commission disqualified himself from discussion. The deferred item--SP-422, Amendment to Hickory Ridge PUD--was again deferred. It was noted that Mrs. Carddock did attend the September 9th meeting of the Planning Commission. Lexington Subdivision Site Plan The preliminary plan for this was submitted to the Commission last year. Mr. Tucker gave the staff report which recommended final approval pending the arrival of the letter from the Highway Department, which is expected in the next 2-3 days. Dr. Sams moved approval of the plan; Mr. McClure seconded the motion, which passed unanimously with the condition that the letter from the Highway Department did arrive in the proper order. Moore Brothers Site Plan Mr. Tucker presented the staff report and asked the Commission if final approval could be given administratively. The change which was requested was the moving of the raw materials to the back of the site and the moving of the equipment to the front of the site, for aesthetic reasons. Mr. Humphrey stated that he would like to put the matter before the Board November 13, 1974, and that was the reason that they were asking for administrative approval. Mr. Rinehart moved approval of the change subject to a complete site plan being on file with the County and subject to the previous conditions which had been placed by the Commission. Mr. Barksdale seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. Amendment to the County Land and Subdivision Ordinance concerning the fees for preliminary plats Mr. Humphrey gave the staff report, stating that the County Engineers felt it imperative that preliminary plans be submitted, however, the costs as outline in the LAND SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, in many cases were usually needed. The proposed amendment was that the charge for preliminary plats would be as follows: 1. $40.00 per preliminary plat. 2. $0.25 per lot located within the preliminary plat. 3. each filling of a preliminary plat, whether or not a preliminary plat for the same property has been filed previously, shall be subject to the same require- ments and fees as specified for filing of the preliminary plat. Mr. Rinehart made the motion that this admendment be approved by the Planning Commission; Mr. McClure seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. Commission input on the "Zoning Analysis and Impact" study Mr. Humphrey noted that this was a preliminary document and stated that the purpose of the discussion was to ascertain if any additions, deletions, or corrections should be made. The Commission noted that a few changes should be made. Mr. Goode Love, participating in the public hearing, suggested that the Planning Department incorporate some sort of "pie chart" of percentages as a "be- fore" and "after" study of zoning. Proposed Zoning Ordinance Work Session It was suggested that the Board of Supervisors be asked to review Article 2-1-25 (24.1) of the Zoning Ordinance, which pertained to the proposed executive offices. The Yancey Property located near Yancey Mills is presently zoned B-1. Under the proposed zoning ordinance the property has been placed in a residential zone. The Commission voted to extend the zone and to zone the property as CL. Old Business: Mrs. Craddock stated that since the Commission had voted not to use any advertising for presenting the new zoning ordinance and zoning map, she would notify the agency with which she had talked of this decision. A new sign ordinance was passed by the Planning Commission but tabled by the Board of Supervisors upon the recommendation of their Sign Study Committee. It was noted by Mr. Tucker that this was done until such legislation could be passed by the General Assemby which would enable more discussion on the new sign ordinance. 9 New Business: Mr. Carr suggested to the Commission that comprehensive review sessions were needed before public hearings regarding the new zoning ordinance and zoning map in order that the Commission would be completely informed. The members concurred. The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Joyin L. Humphrey, cretary 3q November 18, 1974 This was a regular meeting of the Albemarle County Planning Commission held on November 18, 1974, 7:30 p.m. at Piedmont Virginia Community College, Charlottesville, Virginia. Those members present were Mr. David Carr, Chairman; Mr. Roy Barksdale; Mr. Jack Rinehart; Mr. Wilbur Tinsley; Dr. James Sams; Mr. Louis Staley; Mrs. Ellen Craddock; and Mr. Lloyd Wood, Supervisor. Mr. Carr called the meeting to order and established that a quorum was present. The minutes of June loth were deferred until Mr. McClure could be present. The minutes of August 19th, September 3rd, September 9th, were approved; the minutes of August 26th were approved subject to one change. SP-430. Rush Estates Mr. Tucker read a letter from Mr. Butch Schwab withdrawing without prejudice his petition for SP-430. Mr. Rinehart made a motion which was seconded by Mr. Tinsley that the Commission accept this withdrawal. It carried unanimously. Long Meadow Subdivision Site Plan This is a plan for 7 lots on a restricted road; the average lot size is 8 acres on the east side of Route 810. The minimum size lot is 5 acres. Mrs. Scala read the staff report and pointed out that the deed restrictions have been approved by the County Attorney for road maintenance by the owners. Mr. Hern and Mr. Roudabush, the applicants, stated that the Health Dept. had checked the site. Mr. Rinehart moved for approval with the following conditions: 1. Road plans be approved by the County Engineer; 2. A grading permit must be obtained and the road must be constructed before the plat is signed. Mr. Barksdale seconded the motion which carried unanimously. Stonehenge Subdivision Section 8--16 lots Mrs. Scala read the staff report and noted that the first 7 sections have been ap- proved. She said that since no sewer would be guaranteed, no Certificate of Occupancy would be available till there is a sewer. Mr. Rotgin, the applicant, mentioned that he would like a little flexibility in the placement of the fire hydrant. M Mrs. Craddock moved approval and Mr. Rinehart seconded with the following condi- tions placed on the plan: 1. Fire hydrant is subject to the approval of the Albemarle County Fire Marshall; 2. No sewer will be guaranteed. The motion carried unanimously. Westgate Apartments Phase 3 Site Plan Mrs. Scala read the staff report on which she explained that unless a variance is obtained, the plan will not meet the Off -Street Parking Ordinance, suggesting that this is to be a condition to approval. The staff also recommended a grading permit. After much discussion about the parking situation, the Commission decided to defer the matter to its next possible meeting when a revised plan could be submitted. This revised plan was to show the projected widening of Hydraulic Road and how this would affect the situation of parking. Pantops Dodge Site Plan Mrs. Scala gave the staff report which included the fact that this site had been approved for an American Motors location. She suggested administrative approval of the landscape plan. It was also noted that there are two entrances to the site from an existing private road. Mr. Aubrey Huffman, speaking for the applicant, stated that no plans had been made about the curb and gutter and probably would not be made unless the Commission made it a requirement. Mr. Packard, speaking for the applicant, told the Commission that there would be two possible ways to eliminate chemicals and oil from passing into the Rivanna River, one of which is an oil collection tank. However, he mentioned that oil spillage is minimal. Mr. Carr established that this is a lease arrangement, but urged the Commission to consider the drainage problem. Mr. Rinehart suggested that the curb and gutter problem be left to the discretion of the Highway Department and that the Commission abide by its recommendation. At this point he moved approval with the following conditions: 1. Highway Department recommendations on curb and gutter on Route 250 be ac- ceptable to the Commission. 2. Planting plan be approved by the Planning Commission. 3. Soil Erosion Ordinance be met. 4. Internal waste from the daily operation of the site be approved by the Health Department. Mrs. Craddock seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. Beauty Shop and Mobile Home Parts Office Site Plan Mrs. Scala gave the staff report and noted that no new grading would be necessary since there is an existing structure. She said the staff felt this would be an improve- ment for the property. Mr. Bond, the applicant, briefly outlined the types of repair part that would be available. Mr. Carr asked Mrs. Scala to bring the landscaping to the attention of Mr. Caleb Stowe, the owner of the property. Mr. Tinsley moved approval with the following conditions: 1. No storage of parts or used mobile homes on the site. Mr. Barksdale seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. North 29 Paint and Supply Site Plan Mrs. Scala told the Commission in her staff report that this was the re -location of an existing business. A 30' entrance had been required by the Highway Department. Dr. Sams moved approval and the motion was seconded by Mr. Rinehart. The plan was passed unanimously. Dent Plat Mrs. Scala reported to the Commission that Mr. Dent was asked for an access ease- ment of 20 feet in width. This easement would come off St. Rt. 784. The Commission approved the request with the condition that no future subdivision plans without approval from the Commission be planned along this easement. Hicks Plat Mrs. Scala reported that this was a request for a 20' right-of-way to serve Parcel Y. She stated that it would come off an existing 16' right-of-way which in turn comes off St. Rt. 729. The Commission approved this request subject to no future subdivision plans to be planned along this right-of-way without the consent of the Planning Commis- sion. Since there was no further business, the meeting was adjourned. John L. Humphrey, Seetary J M November 25, 1974 The work session of the Albemarle County Planning Commission was held on November 25, 1974, at 7:30 p.m. in the Board of Supervisors meeting room, County Office Building, Charlottesville, Virginia. Those members present were Mr. David Carr, Chairman; Mr. Clifton McClure, Vice - Chairman; Mr. William Barksdale; Mr. Peter Easter; Mr. Jack Rinehart; Dr. James Sams; Mrs. Ellen Craddock; Mr. Louis Staley. Mr. Carr called the meeting to order and established that a quorum was present. The minutes of June 10, 1974 were approved conditional to Mr. McClure's final approval. The minutes of October 21, 1974 were approved subject to the changes that Mr. Rinehart made. The first order of business was the presentation of the Chetsnut Grove Subdivision Site Plan. Mr. Humphrey reported that this is a subdivision of 4 lots and that the plan was in order. Preliminary subdivision site plan had already been approved. The site plan called for individual wells. Mr. Elmo Londeree, owner, is looking to develop rear property at a later date. The plan was approved with the following conditions: 1. Lots 1 and 2 are to enter through the dedicated road; and 2. Lots 3 and 4 are to have a common driveway. The motion to approve was made by Mr. Rinehart and seconded by Dr. Sams. It passed unanimously. WORK SESSION Brief update on status of Proposed Zoning Map and Text: Mr. Humphrey told the Commission that no further re -zoning should take place which did not comply with the Proposed Zoning Ordinance which would hopefully be adopted. He cited two properties in which this has been done --the Nooks and Yancey properties. He told the Commission that the staff, the County Attorney, the Michie Company, and the Zoning Administrator have been spending a considerable amount of time working out the fine points and making changes in the format. He also told the Commission that the format had been set up so that it fits the county code. Mr. Easter strongly urged Mr. Humphrey to keep the language of the Proposed Zoning Ordinance in laymen's terms, and yet avoid any ambiguities possible. Mr. Humphrey told the dates of the newspaper coverage and briefly discussed the public hearing dates scheduled for January. �;% Mr. Tucker briefed the Commission on his and Mr. Humphrey's meeting with the Charlottesville -Albemarle Chamber of Commerce and the reception of the Proposed Zoning Ordinance. 11 AL The meeting at Woodbrook was briefly discussed, which primarily centered on the reservoir. Mr. Humphrey told the Commission that an ad hoc committee is being formed to make the structure for a study on the reservoir property, which will be presented jointly to the city and the county. The study will take in farm, agricultural, and urban runoff. Mr. Carr stated that a large portion of Albemarle County is in the watershed area. Mr. Tucker gave the Commission a very brief outline of the statistics based on zoning for the Evergreen Planned Community which would be heard by the Planning Commis- sion on December 2, 1974, as a special permit. No discussion followed. Review of items requiring Special Permits in the Proposed Zoning Text: Mr. Tucker suggested that the Commission carefully look at certain requirements in the proposed text to determine if they could be permitted by right, rather than with a special permit. During the discussion, the Commission decided to make the following changes in the proposed text: 1. ARTICLE 2 (AGR), 2-1-1(2) was changed to read just "Agriculture." 2. ARTICLE 2 (AGR), 2-1-1(21) was changed to read "Single family rental units, two (2) or less by right, and single family rental units three (3) or more with a site plan approval, provide for in Article 31." 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. B. 9. 10. ARTICLE 2 (AGR), addition of 2-1-1(23) to read "Condominiums with site plan approval." ARTICLE 2 (AGR), addition of 2-1-1(24) to read "Single family, detached units cluster subdivision." ARTICLE 2 (AGR), 2-1-2(5), delete. ARTICLE 2 (AGR), 2-1-2(12), to be by right. ARTICLE 2 (AGR), 2-1-2(16), delete. ARTICLE 3 (CVN), 3-1-1(19), was changed to read "Single family rental units, two (2) or less by right, and single family rental units three (3) or more with a site plan approval, provide for in Article 31." ARTICLE 3 (CVN), addition of 3-1-1(22), to read "Condominiums with site plan approval." ARTICLE 3 (CVN),addition of 3-1-1(23), to read "Single family, detached units cluster subdivision." ARTICLE 3 (CVN), 3-1-2(11), delete. ARTICLE 4 (AL), addition of 4-1-1(18) to approval." ARTICLE 4 (AL),addition of 4-1-1(19) to cluster subdivision." ARTICLE 4 (AL), 4-1-2(2) delete. ARTICLE 4 (AL), 4-1-2(14), delete. ARTICLE 4 (AL), 4-1-2(16), delete. read "Condominiums with site plan read "Single family, detached units ARTICLE 4 (AL), addition of 4-1-2(18), to read "Mobile Homes for individ-1_ double light and expandables." 18. ARTICLE 5 (R-R), addition of 5-1-1(16) to read "Condominiums with site plan approval." 19. ARTICLE 5 (R-R), addition of 5-1-1(17) to read "Single family, detached units - cluster subdivision." 20. ARTICLE 5 (R-R), 5-1-2(1), delete. 21. ARTICLE 5 (R-R), 5-1-2(4), to be by right, but "with site plan approval." 22. ARTICLE 5 (R-R), 5-1-2(7) changed to read "Educational institutions, private and public." 23. ARTICLE 5 (R-R), 5-1-2(8) delete. 24. ARTICLE 5 (R-R), 5-1-2(12) delete. 25. ARTICLE 6 (R-1), addition of 6-1-1(9), to read "Condominiums with site plan approval." 26. ARTICLE 6 (R-1), addition of 6-1-1(10), to read "Single family, detached units cluster subdivision." 27. ARTICLE 6 (R-1), 6-1-2(9), delete. 28. ARTICLE 9 (RT), addition of 9-1-1(10), to read "Condominiums with site plan approval. 29. ARTICLE 9 (RT), 9-1-2(2), delete. 30. ARTICLE 12 (RHM), 12-5 should be changed to read "Buildings may be erected up to eighty (80) feet in height..." 31. ARTICLE 14 (MHP), addition of 14-1-1(7), to read "Condominiums with site plan approval." 32. ARTICLE 14 (MHP), 14-1-2(2), delete. 33. ARTICLE 15 (CO), 15-1-2(5), 15-1-2(6), 15-1-2(7) to be by right and 15-1-2(5) to read "Educational institutions - public." 34. ARTICLE 15 (CO), 15-5-1 should read "There shall be a maximum height limit for permitted buildings of 60'." 35. ARTICLE 16 (CL), 16-1-2(5), 16-1-2(6), and 16-1-2(7) to be by right "with site plan approval." 36. ARTICLE 17 (CG), addition of 17-1-2(29) to read "Bowling alley, roller skating rinks, ice skating rinks, billiard parlors, pool rooms, dance halls, similar forms of public amusement." 37. ARTICLE 17 (CG) 17-1-2(5), 17-1-2(6), 17-1-2(7) to be by right. 38. ARTICLE 17 (CG), addition of 17-1-2(9) to read "Public utilities." 39. ARTICLE 17 (CG), addition of 17-1-2(10) to read "Constitution facilities." 40. ARTICLE 17 (CG), addition of 17-1-2(11) to read "Hospital facilities and medical centers." 41. ARTICLE 17 (CG), addition of 17-1-2(12) to read "Educational institutions." 42. ARTICLE 18 (IR), 18-1-2(3), to be by right. 43. ARTICLE 18 (IR), 18-1-2(5), 18-1-2(6), 18-1-2(8), 18-1-2(10) to be by right. 44. ARTICLE 18 (IR), 18-2 to read "All permitted uses shall have a minimum area of fifty (50) acres." 45. ARTICLE 19 (IL), 19-1-1(3) to read "All uses permitted by Special Permit in IR District except construction facilities (1), public utilities (2), and mobile home parks (3)." 46. ARTICLE 19 (IL), 19-1-1(7) should have the phrase "prefabricated, and modular housing and components" deleted, and this should be included in Special Per- mits. 47. ARTICLE 19 (IL), 19-1-1(9) should be included in USES PERMITTED WITH A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. 48. ARTICLE 19 (IL), addition of 19-1-1(10) to read "Motor vehicle sales, service and rental." 49. ARTICLE 19 (IL), addition of 19-1-1(11) to read "Printing shops." 50. ARTICLE 19 (IL), addition of 19-1-2(12) to read "Welding shops." Mr. Carr asked the Commission if they would defer the remaining items on the agenda. Mr. Humphrey asked the Commission if there were any items or programs they had specific interest in and that they felt needed to be incorporated into the budget of of the coming year. He mentioned such items as mass transit, implementation, etc. Mr. Carr encouraged the Commission to seroiusly think about delegating the authority to approve site plans to the staff or some qualified agent, in order that the Commission could more easily accomplish some of the things it had been charged to do, especially by the enabling legislation; he pointed out that this site plan approval was quite time consuming for the Commission. The meeting was adjourned. of L. Humphrey, Sq�ctary 9