HomeMy WebLinkAbout08 25 81 PC MinutesAugust 25, 1981
The Albemarle County Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on Tuesday,
August 25, 1981, 7:30 p.m., Board Room, Third Floor, County Office Building,
Court Square, Charlottesville, Virginia. Those members present were Mrs. Norma
Diehl, Chairman, Mr. David Bowerman, Vice -Chairman, Mr. Kurt Gloeckner, Mr.
Allen Kindrick, Mr. James R. Skove, Mr. Richard Cogan, and Mr. Corwith Davis, Jr..
Other officials present were Mr. Frederick W. Payne, Deputy County Attorney,
Ms. Mason Caperton, Senior Planner, Ms. Katherine L. Imhoff, Planner and Mr.
Ronadl S. Keeler, Assistant Director of Planning.
After establishing that a quorum was present, Mrs. Diehl called the meeting
to order.
Mrs. Diehl noted for the benefit of the public that Riverrun Site Plan is
being withdrawn and that Fitzwood Final Plat is requesting deferral until
September 15, 1981.
ZMA-81-24 Kno Enterprises Inc. - located on the northern side of Rt. 250
West, approximately one half mile west of the intersection of Route 240 and
Route 250 West. White Hall Magisterial District, County Tax Map 56, Parcel
17B(1). Request to rezone 16.174 acres currently zoned R-1 to R-6. WITH
PROFFER. Deferred from August 4, 1981.
Mr. Keeler presented the staff report.
Mrs. Diehl asked if the applicant had any comment at this time.
Dan Knopp, of Knopp Enterprises, stated that they agree with the recommendations
of the highway department, but reiterated that the zoning on this property has
changed since Commission approval was given in June, 1978. He pointed out that
they offered the adjacent property owner the assessed value for the parcel
joining this property in order to relocate the entrance, but this offer was
refused. He noted that a site plan had been approved by the Commission in June
of 1978, but this expired due to the fact that they could not build at that time.
He asked for the Commission to consider the position he is in and to act favor-
ably on this request.
With no comment from the public, Mrs. Diehl stated that this matter was before
the Commission.
Mrs. Diehl asked Mr. Payne to interpret the following note which is on the plat:
• NOTE: Parcel "C" is to remain a part of Parcel B until such time as it
may be dedicated for road purposes in accordance with deed provisions.
Parcel A shall only have access by way of Parcel C.
spy
Mr. Payne stated that parcel "c" was to be dedicated to public use. He noted
that the pipestem was allowed under the condition that parcel "c" would be
dedicated to public use and that the two larger parcels would share the pipestem
as the only entrance to the property.
Mrs. Diehl ascertained that parcel "a" could not obtain access onto Rt. 250.
Mr. Gloeckner ascertained that both parcels A & B are zoned R-1 at the present
time.
Mr. Cogan stated that he had no problem with the rezoning request, but he would
be relucant to approv a site plan for this parcel.
Mr. Payne stated that if the rezoning request was approved with this as the
only entrance, then the only way a site plan could be denied would be if it
were hazardous to the public health, safety and welfare.
Mr. Bowerman noted the traffic congestion in this area.
Mr. Keeler stated that when the Board of Supervisors acted on the rezoning map,
for this area, they deleted some commercial zoning which had been recognized by
the Planning Commission. He further stated that only those commercial uses
which were actually developed or had a valid site plan at that time were
recognized. He explained that the R-1 zoning was used to define the Crozet
area but noted that the comprehensive plan recommends a density range from
1-4 units.
Mr. Skove moved for denial of this rezoning request, stating that he felt
the entrance onto Rt. 250W was detrimental to the public health, safety and
welfare of the area. Mr. Skove noted that he did approve of the proposed
density and physical design of the plan, but could not support it because of
the location of the entrance on Rt. 250W in regard to the location for the
high school.
Mr. Bowerman seconded the motion which carried by a vote of 5-2, with Mr. Gloeckner
and Mr. Kindrick voting against the motion.
Albemarle Veterinary and Office Site Plan - Deferred from August 18, 1981.
Ms. Imhoff presented the staff report.
Mrs. Diehl asked if the applicant had any questions or comments at this time.
Mr. George Carter, the applicant, stated that the entrance has been redesigned
with a 50' curb radius and an inner radius of 301. He noted that there is an
18' space between the entrance road and where the entrance drive turns. He
noted that they are restricted as to the location of the building due to the
size of the parcel and drainage.
6ZO
Tom Trevillian, Engineer, stated his original concern was the turn onto
Westfield Road. He noted that if a landing coul be constructed so that
the entrance would be perpendicular to the street the sight distance would
be adequate.
Mrs. Diehl ascertained that the island in the center of the entrance is
restricting the traffic flow.
Mrs. Diehl ascertained that with the building at the proposed location, the
entrance could be redesigned so that there would not be an 80' entrance onto
Westfield Road.
Mr. Carter stated that the overall design, in his opinion, would not be as
suitable. He also stated that a 50' entrance radius was more than adequate.
Mr. Trevillian reiterated that he did not disagree with the SO' entrance radius
his main concern is the location of the entrance.
With no further comment from the public, Mrs. Diehl stated that this matter
was before the Commission.
Mr. Skove stated his concern with the location of the entrance.
Mr. Davis stated that the redesign of the entrance and interior circulation
should be added to the conditions of approval for this site plan.
Mr. Skove moved for approval of this site plan subject to the following conditions:
1. A building permit can be processed when the following conditions have
been met:
a. Note utility easements (minimum 10' width);
b. County Engineer and Planning Staff approval of redesign of entrance
and interior circulation;
c. Compliance with the Soil Erosion & Sedimentation Control Ordinance;
d. Albemarle County Service Authority approval of internal plumbing and
sewer construction plans in connection with the Cross Connection Control
Program;
e. Virginia Department of Highways & Transportation approval of the
commercial entrance.
2. A certificate of occupancy will be issued when the following condition
has been met:
a. Fire Official approval of fire flow.
Mr. Gloeckner seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
5zl
$ivPrrun Site Plan - located on the north side of Route 768 (Pen Park Road),
west of Rio Road (East); proposal to locate 400 dwelling units of mixed
unit types on 68.883 acres with a density of 5.8 units per acre. Rivanna
Magisterial District. (Tax Map 62, Parcel 17, 17A and 17B). REQUESTS
WITHDRAWAL.
Mr. Davis moved to accept the request for withdrawal of this site plan.
P,ir. Bowerman seconded the motion, which carried by a vote of 6-1 with Mr.
Gloeckner abstaining.
John Boselz Final Plat - located off the northeast side of Route 743, south
of -Route 660 near Earlysville; proposal to divide a 3.0 acre parcel with an
existing dwelling leaving 16.84 acres residue. Rivanna Magisterial District.
(Tax Map 31, portion of parcel 30).
Ms. Caperton presented the staff report.
Mr. John Bosely stated that he would respond to any questions the Commission
may have.
With no comment from the public, Mrs. Diehl stated that this matter was before
the Commission.
Mr. Cogan ascertained that there is an existing twenty (20) foot right-of-way.
Mr. Davis asked how many development rights remained for this parcel.
Ms. Caperton stated that four (4) additional lots would be allowed on this parcel.
Mr. Cogan asked if a note should be on the plat speaking to the 30,000 square
foot building site.
Ms. Caperton explained that there is an existing dwelling on the site.
Mr. Gloeckner moved for approval of this plat with the following conditions:
1. The plat will be signed when the applicant has met the following conditions:
a. Compliance with the private road provisions, including:
1) County Attorney approval of a maintenance agreement.
Mr. Kindrick seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
6zz
Stephen C. Gelletly Final Plat - located on the west side of Route 729, 1.4
miles south of Route 32�osal to divide 15.603 acres into five lots with
an average size of 3.12 acres. Rivanna Magisterial District. (TM 93, parcel
108).
Ms. Caperton presented the staff report.
Mrs. Diehl asked if the applicant had any comments.
Mr. Gelletly stated that he would respond to any questions or concerns the
Commission may have.
With no comment from the public, Mrs. Diehl stated that this matter was before
the Commission.
Mrs. Diehl ascertained that a soil scientists report is being prepared for this
site.
Mrs. Diehl noted her concern becasuse health department approval has not been
obtained. She also noted that the Soil Conservation Service reports that the
soils on the site are shallow with hard rock at 10 to 20 inches.
Mrs. Diehl ascertained that a turn around is not required on this private road.
Ms. Caperton noted that the highway department has stated that the proposed location
of the entrance has acceptable sight distance as a standard department commercial
entrance without a right turn lane being required.
Mr. Gloeckner moved for approval of this plat subject to the following conditions:
1. The plat will be signed when the applicant has met the following conditions:
a. Compliance with the Soil Erosion Ordinance;
b. Compliance with the private road provisions, including:
1) County Engineer approval of the road plans;
2) County Attorney approval of a maintenance agreement;
c. Virginia Department of Highways & Transportation approval of a commercial
entrance;
d. Provide a road name and a road sign;
e. Delete "without approval of the Albemarle County Planning Commission"
from the note concerning the one dwelling per parcel;
f. Written Health Department approval;
g. Change the magisterial district from Rivanna to Scottsville;
h. Note: "All lots shall have access only on the 30' easement;"
i. The septic setback requirement in this area is 50 feet.
Mr. Davis seconded the motion,
DISCUSSION:
Mrs. Diehl stated she could not support this motion as she felt that the health
department approval and the soil scientist report should be submitted before a
valid judgement can be made.
The vote carried by 4-2-1. Mrs. Diehl and Mr. Bowerman voted against the motion and
Mr. Cogan abstained from voting.
'5Z3
Minor Townhouses, Phase I- Amended Final Plat - located off the east side of
Westfield Road Exten e , nort west o Comonwealth Drive; proposal to amend
the currently approved plat to divide lots for five (S) additional units and
relocate the recreational area in compliance with the approved site plan.
Charlottesville Magisterial District. (Tax Map 61W(2), portion of Parcel 45).
Ms. Caperton presented the staff report.
Mrs. Diehl asked if the applicant had any comments.
Bob Hauser, the applicant, stated he would respond to any questions or concerns
the Commission may have.
Mrs. Diehl asked if there was any public comment concerning this final plat.
Joan Graves, representing the League of Women Voters, noted her concern regarding
the topography of the area. She also asked if Westfield Road has been accepted
for maintenance by the State.
Ms. Caperton noted that Westfield Road was accepted by the State in July, 1981.
Mr. Hauser stated that the topography in the recreational area is flat. He also
noted that street signs have been requested from the highway department.
Mr. Fred Payne, Deputy County AttornP;r, stated that this application is for five
lots and if the Commission chooses to approve this application, the approval should
specifically state that the approval is for five lots. He also noted that he has
approved the maintenance agreement for this road. He explained that the document
was designed to relate to the lots that have already been approved and recorded
but had a provision for the annexation of other properties. He noted that when
this plat is put to record it should have a document stating that it is annexed
and under the same provisions as the original document.
Mrs. Diehl asked Mr. Payne to speak to the request to allow for the phasing of plats
to be signed.
Mr. Payne stated that he felt administrative difficulties could arise if the plats
were allowed to be signed in segments. He noted that it would be difficult for the
Staff to deal with because the same project would be dealt with a number of times
rather than once or twice.
Mr. Hauser stated that because there project is of considerable size, they would
like to retain as much flexibility as possible. He also explained that it takes
approximately four (4) months to build a townhouse, therefore, plats would be
submitted for approval on a bi-annual basis.
Mr. Gloeckner stated that if this was conditioned on the phasing of blocks only,
the Staff would not be required to review individual units.
Mr. Payne stated that this application is for five lots, not a block.
Mrs. Diehl asked if this revised final plat speaks only to the five additional lots.
Ms. Caperton pointed out that the original site plan for eighty-two (82) lots was *MOO
approved by the Planning Commission on November 21, 1978. She noted that this plat
is for five additional lots and shows the relocation of the recreational area.
�2�
Mr. Cogan ascertained that a waiver of the private road provisions is being
requested because of the extra five lots.
Mr. Skove moved to approve the addition of five lots subject to the following
conditions:
1. The plat will be signed when the following conditions have been met by
the applicant:
a. County Engineer review and approval of the stormwater detention plan
for the five (5) additional lots;
b. Compliance with the Soil Erosion Ordinance.
2. This puts the applicant on notice that recreational facilities must be
completed when 50% of the units are ready for occupancy.
3. Waiver of the private road provisions requiring a State maintained road
was granted.
Mr. Gloeckner seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
DISCUSSION: PHASING OF PLATS TO BE SIGNED:
Mrs. Diehl asked how many blocks would be involved if the plats were allowed
to be signed by blocks.
Ms. Caperton stated that a total of eight blocks is involved. (BLOCKS L, G, F. E,
D, H, I, AND J.).
Ms. Caperton also noted that the Staff normally will not sign a phased plat, if the
Commission has not reviewed the plat.
Mrs. Diehl asked Ms. Caperton if she anticipated any difficulty if the plats
were allowed to be signed in segements.
Ms. Caperton stated that if Staff were informed ahead of time that a plat was
to be submitted and if the inspections and bonds were complete, there should be
no difficulty.
Mr. Paynes stated his concern with the road, pointing out that there may be
problems if the road were installed in segements. He also noted that the Staff
would have to be sure that adequate bonds are posted to cover the installation
of the road.
Mr. Davis stated that he has no problem with the plats being signed by blocks.
Mr. Hauser stated that the road for this development has been completed except
for the asphalt surface.
Mr. Gloeckner moved to allow phasing of the development by blocks with the
conditions that the applicant notify the Staff of his intention to have a plat
signed at least two (2) weeks in advance.
Mr. Davis seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
62S
William Marshall Garage Site Plan - located on the north side of Route 649, west
of Route 29 North and east of the Charlottesville -Albemarle Airport; proposal
to locate a 2,500 square foot garage on 2.25 acres. Rivanna Magisterial
District. (Tax Map 32, Parcel 40).
Ms. Caperton presented the staff report and noted that the application had
been substantially changed since the site review meeting and that no comments
had been made on the revisions.
Mrs. Diehl asked if the applicant had any comments.
Bill Roudabush, representing the applicant, stated that this site plan was
submitted with one entrance shown to the site. He noted that a copy of this
site plan was submitted to the highway department and that they requested infor-
mation as to what improvements are planned by the highway department for Rt. 649.
He stated that the proposed cross section for Rt. 649 shows a 110' right-of-way
with a 16' median strip. He further stated that the highway department has
indicated that they will consider the proposed entrance for this site plan when
the commercial entrance permit is applied for.
Mr. Roudabush noted that the Fire Official has reviewed this site and his only
concern was the 20' separation between the gas pumps and the building. He asked
that the Commission act on their regpest and not defer it until September 1S, 1981.
Mrs. Diehl stated that in reviewing the highway department's comments from
site review, they do not speak of more than one entrance for this site. She
asked if they had reviewed this plan in reference to a double entrance.
Ms. Caperton stated that she did not have anything in writing from the highway
department concerning double entrances. She noted that the highway department
did submit a plan ofr the relocation of the entrance.
Mrs. Diehl asked if the Commissioner's wished to consider this site plan at
this time, or defer it Lentil September 15, 1981.
Mr. Davis stated his concern that the adjacent property owners were not notified
of the proposed gasoline pumps.
Mrs. Diehl stated that she felt the highway department should speak to the
two entrances for this site.
Mr. Cogan ascertained that if only the entrance to the west were allowed the
applicant felt the cost was extreme.
Mr. Skove moved to defer this site plan until September 15, 1981.
Mr. Davis seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
6z(a
Fieldbrook, Section 1, 2, and 3, Final Plat - located on the north and south
sides of State Route 652, west of the Westmoreland Subdivision, and north of the
Northfields Subdivision; proposed division of 83 lots on 42.586 acres with 13.07
' ✓ acres in open space and leaving 44.3+ acres in residue. Charlottesville Magisterial
District. (Tax Map 46, Parcel 20, and Tax Map 61, portion of Parcel 126).
Mr. Bowerman disqualified himself by leaving the room.
Mr. Payne stated that although his firm represents Merridale School and the Christian
Missionary Alliance Church, he does not feel like there is a conflict of interest and
therefore, he will participate in the discussion.
Ms. Caperton presented the staff report.
Mrs. Diehl asked if the applicant had any comments.
Mr. Roudabush, representing the applicant, stated that they will respond to any
questions or concerns the Commission may have.
Mrs. Diehl asked if there was any public comment concerning this final plat.
Mr. Frank Doherty, an adjacent owner, asked Mr. Roudabush how close this subdivision
is to his property.
Mr. Dwight Cragguunn, an adjacent owner, asked what the separation was between the
east side of the proposed Fieldbrook Subdivision to the rear of the Northfield lots.
Ms. Caperton stated that there is approximately 350' of separation between this
subdivision and the Northfield Subdivision.
Mr. Bill Ross, an adjacent owner in Northfields, stated that St. Rt. 652 is a dirt
road, noting that the intersection of -Rio Road is in this area. He asked that some
consideration be given to improving this road and to the controlling of traffic at
this intersection.
Dorothy Furin, an adjacent owner, asked how many entrances are proposed for this
subdivision.
Ms. Caperton stated that there is one entrance on Rt. 652 and 1 on Westmoreland.
Ms. Furin stated that she is opposed to this subdivision, noting that she felt
the lots should be bigger for this subdivision.
Doris Best, an adjacent owner, asked if the units will be rental or for sale.
Mr. John Greene stated that the units will be for sale.
With no further comment from the public, Mrs. Diehl stated that this matter is
before the Commission.
Mr. Gloeckner asked if a hydrant study for fire protection has been completed.
Mr. Greene stated that calculations have been completed and reviewed by Ira
Cortez, the Fire Official. He noted that Mr. Cortez stated that they do meet
with fire flow standards.
S2 7t-
Mrs. Diehl asked what the percentage of increase or decrease in fire flow would
be if the calculation was taken other than at the peak hours.
Mr. Greene stated that there is not much difference in the flow, noting the
number of people on the system and the proximity to the facility. He stated
that the original plan was for a cross connection link on Brook Road to tie into
an 18" line at Rio Road which would allow baci: flow to flow in two directions.
Mr. Skove asked what the width of the right-of-way is.
Ms. Caperton stated where Rio Road crosses the Church property the right-of-way is
401, 50' near Merridale, 25' dedicated on the southeast side of Northfields and
the remainder of the right-of-way is 301.
Mrs. Diehl asked Mr. Roudabush if he, anticipated Rt. 652 to be the major access
to Fieldbrook.
Mr. Roudabush stated that as development takes place on the Michael property this
will become more of an access to Fieldbrook.
Mrs. Diehl asked if the Commission could restrict access onto Rt. 652.
Mr. Roudabush stated that when the original plan was submitted this street was
deleted, but the highway department requested that we revise the plan to show a
link stating that they prefer to have a direct connection.
Mr. Skove ascertained that there will be no problem in building that portion of
the road used for this subdivision to state standards.
Mr. Gloeckner moved for approval of this plat subject to the following conditions:
1. The plat will be signed when the applicant has met the following conditions:
a. County Engineer and Virginia. Department of Highways $ Transportation approval
of road plans, including curb and gutter, for acceptance into the State
system (this includes internal roads and Route 652 along the lot frongage
shown on the plat);
b. County Attorney approval of homeowners' agreements to include the main-
tenance of common open space, stormwater drainage and appurtenant structures,
and tree easements;
c. Compliance with the Soil Erosion Ordinance;
d. Virginia Department of Highways & Transportation approval of commercial
and private entrances;
e. Fire Official approval of hydrant location and fire flow (and/or building
separation);
f. Albemarle County Service Authority approval of water and sewer plans, and
hydraulic analysis of water system, if needed;
g. A sidewalk shall be provided on the west side of Route 652;
h. No buildings shall be located on slopes of 250 or greater;
i. Only those areas where structures, roads, utilities, drainage structures,
etc., are located shall be disturbed; all other land shall remain in its
natural state;
j. Structure on lot 5, Section 1 (north side of Old Brook Road) must be
removed;
k. Wooded areas and 20 foot tree easement buffer shall be maintained in a natural
state;
L29
1. Street signs shall be provided; a sign shall be located within the
easement on Lot 1, Section One, (north side of Old Brook Road) separating
Old Brook Road and Westmoreland Road;
m. Provide a 20 foot tree easement buffer between lot 1, Section One
(south side of Old Brook Road) of Fieldbrook and Westmoreland;
n. Provide survey of open space boundary on Section 3;
o. Correct lot numbers (or note blocks) on the plat for Section One;
p. County Engineer review of the Stormwater detention plan to determine
if fencing is necessary;
q. County Engineer approval of building sites on lots 2 and 3, Section One
(north side of Old Brook Road) and lots 18, 19, and 29 of Section Three.
Mr. Kindrick seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
Fitzwood Final Plat - located on the north side of Route 250 East, east of Route
44, about 6 miles east of Charlottesville; proposal to divide 10.572 acres into
five lots of 2.0 acres each. Rivanna Magisterial District. (Tax Map 80, Parcel
59B, portion of Parcel 60A.)
Mr. Bowerman rejoined the meeting.
Ms. Caperton noted that the applicant is requesting deferral of this plat until
September 15, 1981.
Mr. Kindrick moved to accept the request for deferral of this plat until September
15, 1981.
Mr. Cogan seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
The meeting adjourned at 9:35 p.m.
cm
. iucxer, jr., becr�etary
5Z9