HomeMy WebLinkAbout01 24 84 PC MinutesJanuary 24, 1984
The Albemarle County Planning Commission held a public hearing on Tuesday,
January 24, 1984. Those members present were: Mr. David Bowerman, Chairman;
Mr. Richard Cogan, Vice Chairman; Mr. Harry Wilkerson; Mr. Jim Skove; Mr.
Tim Michel; Mr. Richard Gould and Ms. Norma Diehl. Other officials present
were: Mr. Ronald Keeler, Chief of Planning; Ms. MaryJoy Scala., Planner;
and Mr. Fred Payne, Deputy County Attorney, and Ms. Pat Cooke, Ex-Officio.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and established that
a quorum was present.
Election of Officers:
The following persons were unanimously elected to serve as officers
for the Commission for 1984: Mr. David Bowerman, Chairman; Mr. Richard
Cogan, Vice Chairman; and Mr. Bob Tucker, Secretary.
SP-83-87 Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority - Request in accordance with
Sections 30.3.5.2.1.2 and 30.3.5.2.1.4 to construct Crozet Interceptor
Part III and to locate a sewer lift station adjacent to Route 250 West
at Lickinghole Creek. Deferred from January 10.
Mr. Keeler presented the staff report. Staff recommended approval subject
to conditions.
The Authority was represented by Mr. George Williams, along with several
other staff members. They offered no significant additional comment..
The Chairman invited public comment.
Mr. Jeff Clayton, a property owner across whose property the interceptor
would fall, asked if there would be any above -ground structures on his
property.
There being no further comment, the matter was placed before the Commission.
Mr. Shupe responded to Mr. Clayton's question, but his answer was inaudible.
Mr. Clayton stated that it was his desire that the line be located as
close to the Highway as possible.
Mr. Williams, at Mr. Bowerman's request, explained the negotiation
process with property owners.
There followed brief comments about manholes, stream crossings, etc.
Mr. Cogan stated he felt the application was not complete enough to
satisfy his concerns, i.e. he felt more information was needed
about location and engineering matters.
January 24, 1984
Page 2
Mr. Cogan particularly questioned the idea of the sewer line passing
through the siltation pond.
Ms. Diehl agreed with Mr. -,Coganb concerns.
Mr. Elrod, the County Engineer, commented on the detention pond and the
possible effects of the sewer. He stated he was satisfied there was
no possibility of the line effecting the pond.
Mr. Cogan, Mr. Bowerman and Ms. Diehl stated they would like to see
more information on the project before giving final approval. However,
staff indicated there was very little further information that could
be provided.
Mr. Skove stated he was satisfied the County Engineer's Department
could address the concerns. Mr. Michel agreed.
There was discussion as to whether or not the matter should be deferred.
It was finally decided the item would not be deferred but staff was
directed to come up with a list of the Commission's concerns to be
forwarded to the Board along with the Commission's motion.
Mr. Skove moved that SP-83-87 for Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority be
recommended to the Board of Supervisors for approval subject to reservations
which will be detailed at the Commission meeting January 31, and subject
also to the following conditions:
1. County Engineer review and approval in accordance with the requirements
of 30.3 Flood Hazard Overlay District of the Zoning Ordinance, including
pump station levee.
2. Staff approval of site plan for pump station, to include a landscaping
plan if deemed necessary following construction.
3. Watershed Management Official review of contractor specifications and
grading permit to be guided by construction Best Management Practices as
outlined by the Watershed Management Plan, Comprehensive Plan and State
Water Control Board.
4. Approval of appropriate local, State and Federal agencies.
5. Compliance with the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority letters dated
January 17, 1984, and January 23, 1984.
6. Approval is for either the original route or the alternate route around
proposed Lickinghole Creek sedimentation pond.
7. The granting of this permit shall.not be deemed to impair or otherwise
affect the rights of the applicant or any other person concerning the
acquisition of any right-of-way or other interest in property for this
project or the compensation to be paid therefore, nor to preclude subsequent
minor variations or changes in alignment of the sewer line and related
facilities occasioned by negotiations between the Rivanna Water and Sewer
Authority and individual property owners.
Mr. Michel seconded the motion which passed (6:1) with Ms. Diehl casting
the dissenting vote.
/A
January 24, 1984
Page 3
Frye/Winston Preliminary Plat - Located east side of Route 631, approximately
11i miles north of its intersection with Route 708. Proposal to diuhe
10.0± acres each. Tax Map 101, Parcel 25, Scottsville District, zoned
Rural Areas. Deferred from December 20. 1983.
The applicant was requesting deferral to February 28, 1984.
Mr. Skove moved that the Frye/Winston Preliminary Plat be deferred to
February 28, 1984. Mr. Michel seconded the motion which passed unanimously.
Phillips Building Supply Outdoor Storage Yard Site Plan - Located south
side of Route 631 (Rio Road), west of Route 29 Borth. Proposal to locate
a storage yard on a lot containing 30,480 square feet. Tax Map 61,
Parcel 120V, Charlottesville District, zoned Highway Commercial. Deferred
from December 20, 1983.
Ms. Scala presented the staff report.
There was a brief discussion about the use of the word "proffer" in
condition 1(b). Mr. Payne determined that the condition was acceptable
as written.
The applicant was represented by Mr. John Zunka. He asked that the
Commission delete condition 1(a) which required a turn lane, and
condition l(d) which required a 25' dedication across the front of
the property. He explained that the Phillips Corporation owns the property
which fronts on Rio Road, but this application is being made by a private
citizen, Ray and Jane Phillips. He stated there was a legal question as
to whether private citizens can be required to dedicate corporate
property.
There being no public comment, the matter was placed before the Commission.
There was a discussion about the width of the existing right-of-way.
Mr. Payne stated he imagined the right-of-way was probably not wider
than 40 feet and was most likely 30 feet (15 feet from the center line),
thus a decel lane would fall outside the right-of-way.
Ms. Diehl stated she preferred that the conditions remain as written
by staff. She moved that the Phillip's Building Supply Outdoor Storage
Yard Site Plan be approved subject to the following conditions:
1. A grading permit will not be issued until the following conditions
have been met:
a. Virginia Department of Highways & Transportation approval of
turn lane on Rio Road;
b. County Engineer approval of: (1) Proffer by developer to
contribute to an off -site stormwater detention facility; (2)
Drainage details for flume and erosion control structure, and
drainage ditch along 30' right-of-way;
c. Erosion control permit;
i9
January 24, 1984 Page 4
d. Dedication of 25' from centerline of Rio.across frontage
property;
e. Drainage easement to be obtained from adjacent property owner;
f. Fire Officer approval of hydrant location and storage yard plan.
Mr. Skove seconded the motion which passed unanimously.
The Commission recessed for 10 minutes.
Peter Williams Final Plat Reconsideration - Request to amend condition 1(b)
of December 20, 1983 approval. Located eastern end of Inglewood Drive,
south of its intersection with Solomon Road. Tax Map 60, Parcel
74, Charlottesville District, zoned R-4.
Ms. Scala presented the staff report. The report concluded: "Staff
sees no problem with this request provided access to parcel B is
dedicated at this time. No bond will be required. When Georgetown
Lane Final Plat is submitted, the entire road will be dedicated and a
bond required."
The applicant was represented by Mr. Tom Lincoln who offered no additional
comment.
'there being no public comment, the matter was placed before the
Commission.
Mr. Skove moved that the Peter Williams Final Plat request to amend
condition 1(b) be approved and that said condition be amended as follows:
1.(b) - Note on plat the dedication of access from Inglewood Drive
west of the site to Parcel B.
Mr. Cogan seconded the motion which passed unanimously.
Greene Gardens Amended Site Plan Request for administrative approval.
Located east side of Rt. 29 North. Tax Map 45, Parcel 104, Charlottesville
Magisterial District, zoned C-1.
Ms. Scala presented the staff report. The report explained the applicant
was requesting amendment of the site plan, i.e. a proposal to remove
part of the existing outside lath structure and replace it with about
1,200 square feet of new retail area. The report concluded: "Staff
recommends approval because the addition is minor and does not.requir.e
an expansion of the septic system. Staff would recommend as a condition
of the certificate of occupancy that the site be cleaned up around the
storage buildings."
The applicant was represented by Mr. Walden. He explained that there was
no objection to planting additional screening. He also stated there
was no plan to use the storage area for retail use and there would be
no way to increase existing parking space. He stated that usage would
not increase so there would be no additional burden on the septic system.
AVO
January 24, 1984
Page 5
Ms. Diehl moved that staff be granted administrative approval of the
Greene Gardens Amended Site Plan subject to the following conditions:
1. The site shall be cleaned up around the storage buildings.
2. A double row of white pines for screening shall be planted on the
northeast parking lot.
3. The applicant is put on notice that he may not have adequate parking
if he wishes to convert the storage building to retail use at some
future time.
Mr. Cogan seconded the motion.
In response to the applicant's questions about landscaping requirements,
it was determined this would be handled by staff.
The motion for approval passed unanimously.
Spring Valley Farm, Lot 2, Final Plat _ Located north of Broadway Street,
south of the C & 0 Railroad, east of Franklin Street. Proposal to create
25,000 square -foot parcel (.57 acre), leaving 4.193 acre residue. Tax
Map 77, Parcel 40D (part of), Scottsville District, zoned Light Industrial.
Ms. Scala presented the staff report. The report explained: "The only
reason for Commission review is because the plat is located within the
Urban Area. The Subdivision Ordinance prohibits administrative approval
within the Urban Area, Communities or Villages. No major concerns arose
during the Site Review Meeting. The site plan will come to the Planning
Commission when it is submitted for approval."
The applicant was represented by Mr. Buddy Edwards. He offered no
additional comment.
There being no public comment, the matter was placed before the Commission.
Mr. Skoved moved that the Spring Valley Farm, Lot 2, Final Plat be
approved (no conditions).
Mr. Michel seconded the motion which passed unanimously.
Krohn Preliminary Plat - Located on the northwest side of Route 666,
just south of its intersection with Route 664, northwest of Earlysville.
Proposal to create 4.lots, ranging from 5.0 to 9.058 acres, served
by a private road. Tax Map 18, Parcel 19, White Hall District, zoned
Rural Areas.
Ms. Scala presented the staff report.
The Chairman invited applicant comment.
January 24, 1984
Page 6
A representative of the applicant addressed the Commission. (He failed
to identify himself.) He commented on the applicant's desire for
a private road.
There being no public comment, the :natter was placed before the Commission.
Ms. Scala commented on setback requirements and noted that these are
determined by the Zoning Ordinance (not the Commission), though the
applicant can request a variance. She commented particularly on the
difference in setback requirements for corner lots.
Commissioners Skove and Cogan noted they had no objections to a private
road.
Mr. Skove moved that the Krohn Preliminary Plat be approved subject to
the following conditions:
1. The final plat will not be signed until the following conditions have
been met:
a. Health Department approval;
b. County Engineer approval of road and drainage plans and computations;
c. Correct front building setback to 75' from right-of-way;
d. Maintenance agreement to be approved and recorded;
e. Rote on plat: Only one dwelling per lot. No further division of
Parcel A without Planning Commission approval;
f. Soil erosion permit;
g. Virginia Department of Highways & Transportation approval of
private commercial entrance;
h. Runoff Control permit, if required.
Ms. Diehl seconded the motion.
It was noted the Commission would review the final plat.
The motion for approval passed unanimously.
Jerry Jordan Final Plat - Located on the south side of Route 630 and north
of Route 717, near Alberene. Proposal to create 4 parcels ranging in size from
2.07 to 17.403 acres with private road. Tax ?lap 119, Parcel 51, Scottsville
District, zoned Rural areas.
The applicant was requesting deferral to January 31.
Ms. Diehl moved that the Jerry Jordan Final Plat be deferred to January 31.
Mr. Cogan seconded the motion which passed unanimously.
January 24, 1984
Page 7
Ednam Forest Lake Cottages Site Plan - Located on the south side of Route 250
West, northwest of Ednam Drive. Proposal to locate 15 hotel lodging
units on 6.24 acres. Tax Map 59D2, Parcel 2 (part of), Samuel Miller
District, zoned Highway Commercial.
Ms. Scala presented the staff report.
There was a brief discussion about Highway Department recommendations
and the applicants request that the turn lane extension requirement
be lifted. It was determined the final determination as to whether
the turn lane should be extended would be left to the highway Department,
but the Commission asked to be made aware of the outcome'of the issue.
Ms. Scala explained that if the applicant can show this is a special
case because the property involved is not under his control, then
the requirement could possibly be lifted.
The applicant was represented by Mr. Fred Pugsley. He explained the
applicants proposal. He noted that it had been determined that the
road radius was adequate for emergency vehicles.
Mr. Charles Ancona, also representing the applicant, commented briefly
on the entrance issue. He stressed that 360 feet was under the control
of another property owner, but stated that the applicant would
do everything possible within the available right-of-way.
The Chairman invited public comment.
Ms. Lora Newman expressed concern about building on steep slopes.
A representative of the applicant, Mr. Rogan, replied to Ms. Newman'.s
question.
There being no further public comment, the matter was placed before the
Commission.
Mr. Michel noted that he was willing to let the Highway Department
make the final determination in regard to road and entrance requirements.
Mr. Michel moved that the Ednam Forest Lake Cottages Site Plan be approved
subject to the following conditions:
1. Building permits will not be issued until the following conditions have
been met:
a. Service Authority approval of final water and sewer plans;
b. Erosion control permit;
c. Virginia Department of Highways & Transportation approval of
entrance improvements on Rt. 250 West;
d. County Engineer approval of retaining wall;
e. County Engineer approval of building on 25% slopes;
f. Staff approval of outdoor lighting;
g. County Engineer.approval of proposed road alignment.
January 24, 1984
Page 8
2. A certificate of occupancy will not be issued until the following
condition has been met:
a. Fire Officer approval of fire flow.
Mr. Wilkerson seconded the motion.
Mr. Skove stated he would like to.be made aware of the Highway Department's
reasons if the requirement for a turn lane should be deleted.
GIs. Diehl expressed an inter.est.in seeing a site plan which showed the
areas of 25% slopes which were being used for the parking areas and
cottages. ?pis. Scala responded that she did not have that material
readily available. She asked Mr. Pugsley if he could respond. Mr. Pugsley
stated he did not believe any of the parking area was in 25% slopes and
only two units.
The previously -stated motion for approval passed unanimously.
River Run, Phase VII, Revised Site.Plan - Located on the north side of
Route 768 (Pen Park Road), west side of River Run Drive. Proposal to
locate 24 townhouse units and 24 condominium units on 5.189 acres.
Tax Map 62D, Parcel 1 (part of), Rivanna District, zoned R--6.
Ms. Scala presented the staff report.
The applicant was represented by Mr. Ed Eichman. He explained the
applicant's proposal and the reasoning behind the layout of the units.
Mr. Mark Osborne, engineer for the project, was also present. He explained
how the plan had been approved over the original plan.
There being no public comment, the matter was placed before the
Commission.
There was a discussion about the recreational amenities. Mr. Bowerman
noted he would have no problem deleting the pool and clubhouse. However,
GIs. Diehl disagreed and pointed out if a substitution is to be made it
should be with some facility that is not immediately available. She
noted that Pen Park already has a jogging trail and tennis courts, but
does not have a pool. Commissioners Michel and Cogan agreed with GIs.
Diehl.
Ms. Diehl stated she -had no objection to the variation in the first
condition since it would have to be approved by the County Engineer.
Ms. Diehl moved that the River Run, Phase VII, Revised Site Plan be
approved subject to the following conditions:
1. A building permit will not be issued until the following conditions
have been met:
a. Final water and sewer plans to be approved by Service Authority;
b. County Engineer approval of:
(1) Drainage plans and computations for overall site;
(2) Roof drains and xetEadg wall design for any unit, or group
of units;
.�2*
January 24, 1984
Page 9
(3) Private road plans;
(4) Building on 25% slopes;
C. Issuance of an erosion control permit;
d. Fire Officer approval of hydrant locations;
e. Virginia Department of Highways & Transportation approval of
drainage plans;
f. Only those areas where buildings, roads, driveways, utilities or
other improvements are to be located shall be disturbed; all other
land shall remain in its natural state.
2. Certificates of Occupancy shall not be issued until the following
conditions have been met:
a. Subdivision plats shall have been approved and recorded;
b. Recreational amenities shall be provided by the time the third
building phase is ready for occupancy. The amount of the
facilities (50 square feet per unit) shall be determined by the
number of units to be completed at the end of the third building
phase. Also at this time, recreational equipment and details
on the clubhouse and pool shall be approved by the staff;
c. Street sign provided;
d. Fire Officer approval of fire flow.
Mr. Cogan seconded the motion.
Discussion:
Mr. Skove questioned whether this type of improvement (pool) could
be considered necessary for the public good. Mr. Bowerman stated he
would not vote against the motion because he agreed that there should be
some viable substitute.
The previously -stated motionfor approval passed unanimously.
Briarwood Final Plat, Sections III and VII, 26 Lots - Request for recon-
sideration of condition 1.f of conditions of approval of January 10, 1984.
Mr. Keeler presented the staff report, and explained recommended changes
in previous conditions of approval. He explained there were some problems
with the bonds, which had necessitated these changes.
The following persons expressed concerns about the tot lot: Ms. Kathy
Vandenburg and Ms. Margaret Komez. Mr. Wood attempted to answer some
of their questions. The issues related to the tot lot included:
accessability, poor condition of equipment, and relocation.
There was a lengthy discussion about the recreational facilities.
Mr. Cogan moved that the following conditions be substituted for the
conditions approved January 10, 1984 for Sections III and VII of the
Briarwood Final Plat:
January 24, 1984
Page 10
1. The plat will not be signed until the following conditions have been
met by the applicant:
a. Completion of Austin Drive to Route 606 (alternative: completion
of Austin Drive to Lot 82 and provision of temporary cul-de-sac,
completion of Briarwood Drive to Lot 1 and .provision of temporary
cul-de-sac, completion of Heather.Court, completion of Whitney
Court, and acceptance of those roads into the Virginia Department
of Highways and Transportation system (including sidewalks). In
lieu of construction, the applicant may post funds for such work
in an amount and type acceptable to the County Engineer and County
Attorney.
b. Correction of all outstanding water and sewer system problems
(if any) to the reasonable satisfaction of the Albemarle County
Service Authority.
c. Correction of tot lot and playground to the reasonable satisfaction
of the Planning Staff.
(Note: Staff was specifically looking for the following:
To re -locate the tot lot equipment at least 20 feet
from the nearest residential lot line and at the same
time to make it more accessible; To correct the installation
of the playground equipment in accordance with a memo
.from Jesse hurt; To lower the basketball goal to provide
a 1/2 regulation court, with the specifications to be
approved by the. County Engineer.)
d. In construction of sidewalks, the developer shall relocate or
replace mailboxes, landscaping and other improvements at his expense
with no expense to the lot owners.
e. All required improvements for these current 26 lots are to be
completed and accepted by the County Engineer, the Virginia Depart-
ment of Highways and Transportation and the Albemarle County
Service Authority prior to signing of the plat for recordation.
Provide temporary cul-de-sac for Wren Court. In lieu of con-
struction, the applicant may post bond for such work in an amount
and type acceptable to the County Engineer and County Attorney.
f. Verfication that not less than twenty-five percent of the total
aggregate area platted is dedicated open space.
g. County Attorney approval of homeowner's agreements to include
the maintenance of open space, stor-,ziater facilities and
appurtenant structures.
h. Purchase of twenty-six residential sewer connections from the
Albemarle County Service authority.
i. Correction of Notes on the plat to Staff satisfaction. The plat
to be recorded shall show only those lots being currently approved
with adequate references, tie 11neR and the like for locational
purposes. Easement plats are to be recorded simultaneously with
the subdivision plat.
-v/
January 24, 1984 Page 11
2. No concrete pads, buildings, porches, decks or any part of any structure
shall encroach on utility easements.
3. Iron pins shall be set at front lot corners prior to acceptance of
roads into the public system.
Ms. Diehl seconded the motion which passed unanimously.
There was a brief discussion about the Annual Report.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 11:15 p.m.
Recorded by: Janice Wills
Transcribed by: Deloris Sessoms, 8-89
,�r