Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08 14 90 PC MinutesAUGUST 14, 1990 The Albemarle County Planning Commission held a public hearing on Tuesday, August 14, 1990, Meeting Room 7, County Office Building, Charlottesville, Virginia. Those members present were: Mr. Harry Wilkerson, Vice Chairman; Mr. Phil Grimm; Mr. Tom Jenkins; Ms. Ellen Andersen; Mr. Walter Johnson; and Ms. Babs Huckle. other officials present were: Mr. David Benish, Chief of Community Development; Mr. Ron Keeler, Chief of Planning; Mr. Richard Tarbell, Planner; Mr. Bill Fritz, Senior Planner; Ms. Yolanda Lipinski,Planner; and Mr. Jim Bowling, Deputy County Attorney. Absent: Commissioner Rittenhouse. The Vice Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and established that a quorum was present. The minutes of July 17, 1990 were approved as submitted. CONSENT AGENDA PREVIEW - Mr. Fritz presented a brief preview of items to appear on the August 21st Consent Agenda which included the Peacock Hill Section 7 Preliminary Plat, the Forest Lakes Blocks I, J, K, L, M, N, O Preliminary Plat and the Townside II Final Site Plan. No action was required of the Commission. Northern Urban Area Elementary School Site for Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan (15.1-456 Review)- - As per Section 15.1-456 of the Code of Virginia the Albemarle County School Board has requested that the Planning Commission review the proposed Northern Urban Area School site for compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. The site contains approximately 24 acres. The site consists of multiple parcels located north of Rio Road and west of Berkmar Drive Extended behind the Rio Hills Shopping Center (Tax Map 45, Parcels 29B, 29C, 29D, 29E, 92, 94 and 95). The site has frontage on Berkmar Drive and Woodburn Road. This site is located within a designated growth area. Mr. Benish presented the staff report. The report concluded: "This site meets the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff finds this site in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and recommends favorable action by the Commission." Mr. Johnson asked that staff request that VDOT notify the County if the completion of the road serving this site should fall behind schedule. Mr. Benish responded that it is anticipated that the road will be completed though there is alternative access. He stated staff would inform the Commission if any problems arise. August 14, 1990 The Chairman invited public comment. Page 2 Ms. Robinette Poindexter, a resident of Woodburn Road, expressed her feeling that the site was not suitable for a school site. Her concerns included surrounding noise and objectionable nearby uses. There being no further public comment, the matter was placed before the Commission. Ms. Huckle noted that Ms. Poindexter's comments were valid, but the site had been found to be superior to the others considered. Mr. Grimm moved that the Northern Urban Area Elementary School Site be found to be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Ms. €suckle seconded the motion which passed unanimously. SP-90-66 Centel Cellular Company of Charlottesville (applicant), Louise W..Fisher(owner) - The applicant is proposing to construct a monopole communications tower of approximately 150 feet [10.2.2(6)] on 88.5 acres zoned RA, Rural Areas. Property, described as Tax Map 97, Parcel 4D is located on the north side of Rt. 633 approximately one mile west of Rt. 698 in the Samuel Miller Magisterial District. This property is not located within a designated growth area. Mr. Keeler presented the staff report. Staff recommended approval subject to conditions. Mr. Keeler added that he had been informed that some of the initial information received on this application was incorrect and that "Virginia Tech would take ownership of the fire tower and may want to keep it there to locate an FM transmission antennae on the fire tower." He added that Centel Cellular is agreeable to allowing Va. Tech to locate its FM broadcast antennae on the Centel Cellular tower provided there is no interference between the two transmissions. He stated that would need to be reviewed further. He recommended that condition No. 3 be amended as follows: "Existing Forestry tower to be removed prior to construction of new tower, if agreeable to Va Tech and the property owner." (Note: It was later determined th=s amendment to condition No. 3 was not necessary.) Mr. Keeler also explained that a monopole tower was proposed. August 14, 1990 Page 3 The Chairman invited applicant comment. The applicant was represented by Mr. Fred Landess. He presented a photograph of a tower similar to the proposed tower. Regarding the forestry tower he stated that it has been determined that it will be possible to put the WVTF (VA Tech) transmitter on Centel's monopole and therefore there will be no need to keep the forestry tower which will be removed. Regarding the issue of sight distance at the entrance to the property, he explained that the entrance was not on the Fisher property. He pointed out that Centel did not expect more than two vehicle trips per month for maintenance of the tower. Mr. Wilkerson asked staff to comment on condition 2(b): "Virginia Department of Transportation approval of plan to obtain 250 feet of sight distance at entrance to Rt. 633." Mr. Keeler responded that the total traffic from all the towers would be less than from a single family dwelling. He explained that though the Highway Department had recommended a commercial entrance, staff's recommendation was for 250 feet of sight distance (the same as for an individual entrance) because of the low volume of traffic. He added that it has not yet been determined if the 250 feet can be obtained within the perscriptive easement, but once that has been determined staff will be better able to address the issue before the Board. There being no public comment, the matter was placed before the Commission. Regarding condition 2(b) related to sight distance at the entrance, Ms. Huckle noted that another similar item on the agenda had no requirement for improved sight distance even though the entrance would be used more frequently and was on a much more heavily travelled road. Therefore, she suggested that condition 2(b) be deleted. Mr. Keeler commented that the minimum sight distance for the issuance of an entrance permit is 250 feet. He added, however: "2 know for a fact that VDOT will issue permits to a piece of property to provide access to a public road whether or not it has that sight distance." Mr. Johnson agreed with Ms. Huckle. Ms. Huckle moved that SP-90-66 for Centel Cellular Company of Charlottesville (applicant), Louise W. Fisher (owner) be recommended to the Board of Supervisors for approval subject to the following conditions: August 14, 1990 Page 4 1. Tower height not to exceed 150 feet. 2. Administrative approval of site plan to include: a. Staff approval of equipment building(s) and other improvements. 3. Existing forestry tower to be removed prior to construction of new tower. 4. Staff approval of additional (future) antennae installation. No administrative approval shall constitute or imply support for, or approval of, the location of additional towers, antennae, etc., even though they may be part of the same network or system as any antennae administratively approved under this petition. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion which passed unanimously. SP-90-64 Gordon Ray Shackelford (applicant), The Gardens Partnership (owner) - The applicant is proposing to operate an amusement center [22.2.2(1)] on 7.304 acres zoned Commercial. Appicant is proposing 30-40 video games and pinball machines in the Gardens Development. Property, described as Tax Map 45, Parcel 104 and 104B, is located on the east side of Rotue 29 north of and adjacent to Albemarle Square Shopping Center in the Charlottesville Magisterial District. This property is located within a designated growth area. The applicant was requesting indefinite deferral. Mr. Jenkins moved, seconded by Mr. Grimm, that SP-90-64 be indefinitely deferred. The motion passed unanimously. SP-90-61 Mitchell O. CarrZAucrusta Lumber and Su l Inc. - The applicant is seeking to amend SP-82-9 in order to allow sawmill hours of operation to be expanded to between 6:00 a.m. and 12:00 midnight [5.1.15]. Property., described as Tax Map 99, Parcel 49A, consists of 20.63 acres zoned RA, Rural Areas. Property is located on the west side of Route 712 +9/10 mile south of Route 692 in the Samuel Miller Magisterial District. This property is not located within a designated growth area. Mr. Fritz presented the staff report. The report concluded: "Operations as late as 12 a.m. (midnight) would not be in S/JI-% August 14, 1990 Page 5 harmony with the character of the district, and would be of substantial detriment to adjacent property owners. Therefore, staff cannot recommend approval of SP-90-61 Mitchell 4. Carr/Augusta Lumber & Supply, Inc." The applicant was represented by Howard Carr. He explained that the use predated the existing requirements since it was 25 years old. He stated that even though a special permit had been issued in 1982, he had been under the impression that the use was grandfathered and that "we could operate as we needed to." He stated the business has, over the years, operated from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. He explained that additional kilns had been built to allow additional hours of operation and to restrict operation at this time would create an economic hardship. He stated the business is presently operating from 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. He explained that the additional hours are needed in order to allow additional work hours during periods of large inventory so that the lumber will not deteriorate. He stated that even though the additional hours are being requested, he did not foresee, at this time, any change in the current hours of operation, but he was making the request to provide for flexibility. The Chairman invited public comment. Mr. Sam Henderson, a neighboring property owner, addressed the Commission. He stated the chipping operation was creating the most objectionable noise. He expressed his objection to the hours of operation being extended. He noted that the business is already operating outside its permitted hours (7 a.m. to 7 p.m.). Mr. David Franzene expressed his opposition to the proposal. He presented a petition of opposition containing 40 signatures. He stressed that this is a quiet, residential, rural community. He noted that though he lived two miles from the sawmill, he could hear it during the evening hours. Mr. Harry Campbell expressed his opposition to the proposal. He felt the applicant should be satisfied with 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. operating hours. There being no further public comment, the matter was placed before the Commission. Ms. Huckle called attention to the fact that the special permit issued in 1972 restricted hours of operation from 7 -017 August 14, 1990 Page 6 a.m. to 7 p.m. she asked if this had been modified. Mr. Fritz replied negatively, and explained further that that permit had mentioned two different sets of hours for operation --one for sawmill activities and the other for loading and unloading wood and wood products. He confirmed that the sawing, planing and chipping was only supposed to be occurring between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. Mr. Johnson stated it was difficult to understand how the applicant could not be aware of the restrictions on the hours of operation when a letter dated May 20, 1982 had been sent to Mr. Howard Carr which outlined the conditions of approval of the special permit. He wondered if other conditions of that permit were also being violated. Mr. Johnson moved that SP-90-61 for Carr/August Lumber and Supply, Inc. be recommended to the Board of Supervisors for denial based on the noise and conflicts with the adjacent properties. Ms. Huckle seconded the motion which passed unanimously. Mr. Johnson proposed that the County Engineer's attention be called to the the provisions of the original special permit to determine if condition 1(b) is being complied with. Mr. Carr asked if Mr. Johnson was referring to the decibel levels. (Mr. Johnson responded affirmatively.) Mr. Carr explained that tests had been performed and submitted to the County Engineer. Mr. Johnson withdrew his proposal. SP-90-56 Alvin & Mary Lenahan - Request for the issuance of a special use permit [5.6] to locate a single -wide mobile home on 21 acres zoned RA, Rural Areas. Property described as Tax Map 84, Parcel 14, is located 0.2 miles on a private esement southwest of Rt. 736, approximately..) mile northeast of the intersection of Rt. 635 and Rt. 736 in the Samuel Miller Magisterial District. This property is not located within a designated growth area. Mr. Fritz presented the staff report. The applicant, Mr. Alvin Lenahan, was present. He offered little comment. There being no public comment, the matter was placed before the Commission. ,3t8 August 14, 1990 Page 7 Ms. Huckle suggested that a condition be added limiting occupancy of the mobile home to the owner and his family only. It was decided the following condition would be added: "Mobile home is to be occupied by Alvin and Mary Lenahan and family only and is not to be rented." Mr. Jenkins moved that SP-90-56 for Alvin and Mary Lenahan be recommended to the Board of Supervisors for approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Albemarle County building official approval; 2. Conformance to all area, bulk and other applicable requirements for district in which it is located; 3. Skirting around mobile home from ground level to base of the mobile home to be completed within thirty (30) days of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy; 4. Provision of potable water supply and sewerage facilities to the satisfaction of the zoning administrator and approval by the local office of the Virginia Department of Health, if applicable under current regulations; 5. Maintenance of existing vegetation, landscaping and/or screening to be provided to the satisfaction of the zoning administrator. Required screening shall be maintained in good condition and replaced it it should die; 6. Mobile home shall not be located on the property until such time as all zoning violations have been abated or the applicant submits an acceptable administrative consent order with the Zoning Administrator; 7. Mobile home is to be occupied by Alvin and Mary Lenahan and family only and is not to be rented. Ms. Huckle seconded the motion which passed unanimously. SDP-90-053 - Adel hia Cable Preliminary Site Plan - Proposal to construct a 720 (24' x 301) square foot building on 0.63 acres zoned RA, Rural Areas. Property, described as Tax Map 45, Parcel 16A, is 1000 feet north of Route 631 in the Jack Jouett Magisterial District. The site is not located within a designated growth area. J/17 August 14, 1990 Page 8 Mr. Fritz presented the staff report. (Prior to presentation of the staff report, Mr. Fritz presented the Commission with a copy of a "determination of compliance" letter dated August 7, 1990 from Amelia Patterson, Zoning Administrator, to Mr. Dennis Rooker. The letter stated: "It is my opinion that the existing satellite dishes are not in violation, but were approved by implication with the Board's approval of SP-90-19." Mr. Fritz reported that, to his knowledge, there had been no appeal of this decision.) Mr. Fritz reported that the concerns raised by the Board of Supervisors had been addressed by the applicant and the conditions of the previous special permits are being met.) Staff recommended approval subject to conditions including the addition of condition 1(d): "Landscape plan shall be revised so as to preserve vegetation to the maximum extent possible." Mr. Johnson asked if approval of this petition would effect the conditions which were imposed on previous permits. Mr. Fritz responded that those conditions would still apply, but a condition could be added to this approval if so desired, i.e. "Compliance with conditions of SP 90-19 and SP-79-32." Mr. Johnson questioned how an additional row of trees could be planted when there was so little space. It was his opinion that approximately 20 feet would be needed for two rows of trees and there appeared to be only 12 feet existing. Mr. Fritz responded that staff had visited the site and feels that there is sufficient room. He added that the trees could be planted as close as ten feet apart rather than 15. Mr. Fritz explained further that the primary reason for the revisions to the existing landscape plan is so that the existing vegetation can be used in addition to this new vegetation in an attempt to better screen the dishes. _pis. Huckle asked if the dishes were considered to be structures and, if so, were they meeting setback requirements? Mr. Fritz responded that he could not address this question as it would be -a determination for the Zoning Administrator to make. Ms. Huckle felt this issue should be looked into. Mr. Johnson noted that if Ms. Huckle were correct, the dishes were obviously not 25 feet from the property line. However, he wondered if the dishes might come under the grandfather clause. The applicant was represented by Mr. Michael Smith. He explained that.the enlargement of the building was to allow for the upgrading of the cable service in the Charlottesville area. J%2d August 14, 1990 Page 9 Referring to minutes of the Board of Supervisors' meeting related to the color of the dishes, Mr. Johnson noted that Mr. Smith had stated that white dishes are used because of their reflective capabilities which result in better reception. Mr. Johnson asked if any less objectionable colors had been considered. Mr. Smith responded that the issue had never come up again and the black dishes do not provide the same quality of reception because they are more absorbant. There being no further comment the matter was placed before the Commission. Mr. Johnson continued the discussion about the color of the dishes. He felt the dishes could be made less obvious if they were a different color. He reported that he had contacted the manufacturer of the dishes (Scientific Atlanta, David Lane, 441--4000) and had learned that dishes are available in other colors and they can also be painted. He felt this was very important because he felt it was not possible to provide enough landscaping to effectively screen the dishes. He recommended that approval include a requirement that the existing dishes either be replaced with a less obtrusive color or be painted. Ms. Huckle expressed concern about the color of the building. Mr. Smith responded that the building is usually either beige or sandstone. Regarding the suggestion that the dishes be painted, Mr. Smith indicated "painting after the fact" would create a maintenance problem. He noted that though other colors might be available, he had never, in 16 years of experience, built a dish that was not white. Mr. Wilkerson noted that he was not an engineer and would not attempt to choose the color of the dish for the applicant. He felt staff had addressed the issues adequately. Mr. Johnson noted that there was apparently a difference of opinion between "two graduate engineers in electronics." Mr. Johnson moved that SDP-90-053 for Adelphia Cable Preliminary Site Plan be approved subject to the conditions of staff with an additional condition requiring that the dishes be a color other than white. Discussion: 1.21 August 14, 1990 Page 10 Mr. Smith indicated he did not know if painting was feasible. He indicated he would be more comfortable with a condition stating that when dishes are replaced they be replaced with a color other than white. Ms. Huckle stated she could not support the motion because she wanted more information regarding setbacks. Mr. Grimm stated he could not support the motion with the condition added by Mr. Johnson. Mr. Wilkerson agreed. Mr. Johnson's motion died for lack of a second. Ms. Andersen made a motion to deny the petition to allow time for questions to be answered related to setback and electronic painting. Mr. Bowling pointed out that a motion for denial must be accompanied by instructions to the applicant as to what can be done to make the application approvable. Mr. Bowling suggested that a deferral might be preferrable because the applicant may be meeting setbacks. He added that apparently the Zoning Administrator has already determined that he is meeting requirements. Mr. Keeler added that it is the Zoning Administrator's position that the existing dishes were approved by the Board of Supervisors with the special use permit. Mr. Keeler also suggested deferral because the applicant had had no forewarning about the issue of dish color and he also pointed out that the setback question is a determination of the Zoning Administrator and is not under the control of the applicant. Ms. Andersen withdrew her motion. Mr. Johnson moved that SDP-90-053 for Adelphia Cable Preliminary Site Plan be deferred to August 28 to allow time for resolution of questions about setback and dish color. Ms. Huckle seconded the motion. The motion passed (4:2) with Commissioners Grimm, Andersen, Huckle and Johnson voting for the motion and Commissioners Jenkins and Wilkerson voting against. .�'AO August 14, 1990 Page 11 Mr. Fritz noted that if the exterior of the building was also a concern the Commission could contact staff. Mr. Wilkerson stated he had heard no obections to the colors stated by Mr. Smith. SDP- 0-055 - Ednam Section B Prelimina Site Plan - Proposal to construct twenty single-family attached units 3.905 acres within the Ednam PRD. Property, described as Tax Map 59D(2), Section 6, Parcels 1C and 1D, is located the east side of Worthington Drive. Zoned PRD, Planned Residential Development in the Samuel Miller Magisterial District. The site is located within a designated growth area. on on Mr. Tarbell presented the staff report. Staff was recommending approval of the two waivers requested (for Sec. 4.2.3.2 related to critical slopes and for Sec. 18-34 related to double frontage lots). With approval of these two waivers, staff was recommending approval subject to conditions. Ms. Huckle asked where the vegetative buffer was supposed to be installed. Mr. Tarbell pointed out it would be between the units and the road. She asked about the area between these units and those behind. Mr. Tarbell responded that he was sure the applicant would provide "plenty of landscaping." In response to Mr. Johnson's question about number of units, Mr. Tarbell explained that the number would be the same as previously shown, but the type of unit had changed. Ms. Huckle asked why this design, with the double -frontage lots, was superior to the previous plan. Mr. Tarbell responded that he did not know if it was superior but the community association supported this plan. The applicant was represented by Mr. Bob McKee and Mr. Ed Cusick. Mr. McKee presented photographs of the site which included some of the existing double -frontage units. He stated: "We believe with adequate landscaping and buffering along Worthington it (double frontage) should not be an issue." The photographs also showed the critical slope areas which Mr. McKee pointed out were all man-made from previous excavation and erosion control measures which were implemented during initial construction of the previous site plan. He stated that the plan was neither superior nor inferior to the old plan, but was simply different with a scale that was more in keeping with Ednam. J�Z3 August 14, 1990 Page 12 Mr. Cusick explained the reason for this plan was based on the neighbors' fear that more of the "square brick structures" would be built in accordance with the previously approved plan. The existing homeowners were adamantly opposed to more of those structures because they obstruct views. He also explained that a substantial landscape buffer is planned "between Worthington and the first six lots ... and between the old existing building and the roadway coming in to clearly identify this as a separate community within the Ednam community." Regarding the rear of lots 7 through 14, he explained that a significant buffer already exists between those lots and the other subdivision, Ednam Village, but it will also be augmented to improve its appearance. He stated Ednam Village was in support of the plan. He explained that existing vegetation between lots 15 and 20 would also be supplemented. He also stated that though the project is not required to meet the new tree canopy ordinance, "we plan on doing that and more." The Chairman invited public comment. Ms. Kay Barbour, President of the Ednam Homeowner's Association addressed the Commission. She presented letters of support from homeowners. She stated the homeowners were very please with the plan. Approximately 15 Ednam residents in attendance at the meeting noted their support for the plan by a show of hands. There being no further comment the matter was placed before the Commission. Mr. Jenkins moved that SDP-90-055 for Ednam Section B Preliminary Site Plan be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The Planning Department shall not accept submittal of the final plan for signature until tentative approval has been obtained for the following conditions. The final site plan shall not be signed until the following conditions are met: a. Department of Engineering approval of grading and drainage plans and calculations; b. Department of Engineering approval of road and drainage plans and calculations; C. Department of Engineering approval of stormwater detention plans and calculations; d. Department of Engineering issuance of an erosion control permit; August 14, 1990 Page 13 e. Department of Engineering approval of drainage easement plats; f. Albemarle County Service Authority approval of final water and sewer plans; g. Note on site plan stating "No concrete pads, building corners, decks, porches, or any part of a structure shall encroach on Albemarle County Service Authority water and sewer easements"; h. Staff approval of a landscape plan to include a vegetative buffer on lots 1-6 in accordance with Section 32.7.9.8.e of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. A certificate of occupancy will not be issued until the following condition is met: a. Fire Official final approval of the fire flow. 3. Administrative approval of the final site plan; 4. Administrative approval of the final plat to include: a. Note on the plat stating "No concrete pads, building corners, decks, porches, or any part of a structure shall encroach on Albemarle County Service Authority water and sewer easements"; b. Staff approval of a road maintenance agreement for the proposed private road. Mr. Grimm seconded the motion which passed unanimously. Willow Lakes Phase 2 Lots 1-16 Preliminary Site Plan - Proposal to create 16 lots on 5.5 acres. Zoned R-41 Residential. Property desxribed as Tax Map 77E(1), Parcel 1 and a portion of Parcel 2, is located on Rt. 20 within the Willow Lakes housing project and toward the southern end of Willow Lake Drive. The site is located within a designated growth area. Ms. Lipinski presented the staff report. Staff recommended approval subject to conditions including the notation that condition 1(a) should be removed (per a letter from the County Engineer) and that 1(d) should be amended to read: "Stormwater management facilities shall be approved and -4-255 August 14, 1990 Page 14 completed or bonded to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department prior to the issuance of a Certificate of OccuDancv., " Mr. Keeler explained that the deletion of 1(a) would mean "the plat could be signed prior to the issuance of a grading permit." He explained that a grading permit would only be needed for the road construction. Referring to condition 1(h), Mr. Johnson asked if the continuation of the waterline was assumed with the waterline easement. Ms. Lipinski explained that the Service Authority has requested that the easement for the waterline be extended. The applicant was represented by Mr. Bob Hauser. Regarding the question about the waterline, he explained that Willow Lake Associates had entered into a contract with the Service Authority to oversize the waterline to provide additional service to that area, thus the reason for a bigger line. He added that he did not think the issue of detention and the lake which had arisen previously would be a problem because drainage plans had been approved by the County Engineer's office (Steve Creswell). He explained that the dam had been built up and a concrete spillway had been installed. Mr. Jenkins recalled that there had been discussions about a damaged culvert (under the road). He asked if that had been repaired. Mr. Hauser did not know if this repair had been made. He stated he had not been involved in the project at that time and was not familiar with the issue. Mr. Keeler explained some of the history of the drainage issues. He stated that there had been two problems: (1) The problem of the creek "jumping into the detention basin" which was the problem of this development and which had been taken care of; and (2) The problem with the road to the existing Lakeside Subdivision which had involved the culvert referred to by Mr. Jenkins and that had been determined to be the responsibility of the.homeowner's in Lakeside Subdivision. There being no further comment the matter was placed before the Commission. Mr. Johnson moved that Willow Lakes Phase 2 Lots 1-16 Preliminary Site Plan be approved subject to the following conditions: Ax August 14, 1990 Page 15 1. The Planning Department shall not accept submittal of the final plat for signature and the final plat shall not be signed until the following conditions have been met: a. Department of Engineering approval of road and drainage plans and calculations; b. Department of Engineering issuance of an erosion control permit; c. Stormwater management facilities shall be approved and completed or bonded to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy; d. Virginia Department of Transportation approval of right-of-way improvements and issuance of a commercial entrance permit; e. Virginia Department of Transportation approval of road and drainage plans and calculations; f. Department of Engineering approval of drainage easement plats; g. Albemarle County Service Authority acceptance of 20' waterline easement to extend to adjacent property; h. Albemarle County Service Authority approval of final water and sewer plans; i. Staff approval of a revised homeowners' agreement to include additional lots; j. Staff approval of a revised master landscape plan, to include a tree conservation program to preserve existing vegetation in accordance with Condition 4 of ZMA-84-01; 2. Administrative approval of final plat and landscape plan. Mr. Jenkins seconded the motion which passed unanimously. There being no further bus 9:25 p.m. DS the meeting adjourned at C ry