Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200400057 TO BE CLASSIFED � OF ALg t. WA i v$Q i 9•A Atti filP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road,Room 227 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126 September 17, 2004 Duane E. Snow 905 West Leigh Dr. Charlottesville, VA 22901 RE: SP-2004-00028 Snow's Rental Units (Sign #69); Tax Map 90, Parcel 35 Dear Mr. Snow. The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on September 14, 2004, unanimously recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that this approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The site shall be developed in general accord with the plans entitled"Snows Storage Yard" revision date of 7/23/04 by David Wyant, P.E. 2. The height of stored items shall be limited to 8' in the front row of storage areas (the row closest to Avon Street) and in the southernmost storage area in the back row as delineated on the plan. 3. Eight foot (8') high solid wood fencing of a design that meets ARB approval shall be used as delineated on the plan for the north and south perimeters of the front row of storage yards, the portions of fencing that connect storage yards in the front row, and the southern side of the southernmost storage yard in the back row. 4. Chain link fence shall not be visible from the EC Chain link fence may only be used following Architectural Review Board confirmation that such fencing will not be visible from the Entrance Corridor. 0 The landscape plan shall be subject to Architectural Review Board review and approval 4\Zir . The ARB shall issue a Certificate of Appropriateness prior to final site plan approval. Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive public comment at their meeting on October 6, 2004. Any new or additional information regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date. If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me (434) 296-5823. Sincerely, Yadira Amarante Senior Planner Cc: Ella Carey Jack Kelsey Amelia McCulley Steve Allshouse • �OAF ALB . 1Iill`�rC.)Walitlie S: 1 IRGIN1P COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5823 Fax (434) 972-4012 April 25,2005 David Wyant 4686 Garth Road Crozet,VA 22932 RE: ARB-2002-31: Snow's Office& Storage Dear Mr.Wyant, I have reviewed the plan with revision date of 4/21/05 for the above referenced application.The revisions contained in this plan meet the conditions of ARB approval that were previously outlined for this proposal. You may consider this letter your Certificate of Appropriateness. This approval is predicated on the fact that the design and materials, as proposed and exhibited for review, will be used. The acceptance of approval implies that the applicant has agreed to execute the design as indicated on the site plan, attachments,materials, samples, and other submittal items presented. Any change in the approved design or materials will require an amendment to the plan and must be reviewed and approved by the Architectural Review Board.This Certificate of Appropriateness does not include approval for any window signs. If window signs are proposed,review by the ARB is required. If you have questions about this action,please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, *77(e Margaret Maliszewski Principal Planner cc: Duane Snow,905 West Leigh Drive, Charlottesville,VA 22901 V Yadira Amarante File tlk,rfik.4"-• e^I,, FroS: COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5823 Fax (434) 972-4012 March 23, 2005 David Wyant 4686 Garth Road Crozet,VA 22932 RE: ARB-2002-31: Snow's Office& Storage Dear Mr.Wyant, I have reviewed the plan with revision date of 2/28/05 for the above referenced application and I have the following comments with reference to the ARB's conditions of approval for the project: 1. Portions of the wood fencing are not clearly labeled. 2. Two of the ARB conditions of approval read as follows: • Create a more informal, evergreen planting in the southwest corner of the site. This planting should tie in with the proposed 4-season buffer and the Leyland Cypress. Plants should be placed in a mixed mass planting rather than planted in rows(single or staggered)of single species. • The planting at the front of the site should provide continuous screening.Add plants accordingly. Sufficient changes have not been made to meet these conditions.Issues include the following: a) The planting in the southwest corner of the site does not constitute an informal,mixed mass planting that is integrated with the 4-season buffer and the Leyland Cypress. b) The screening shrubs along the EC have been moved off-site.The ARB does not typically approve required landscaping in the VDOT right-of-way because there is no guarantee that the plants will remain into perpetuity.The screening shrubs should be located on site. c) The ARB-reviewed plan showed groups of staggered screening shrubs. The intent of the "continuous screening"comment was to fill in the gaps between the groups.A single row of off-site shrubs does not meet the intent of the condition.A staggered row of shrubs located on- site would be more appropriate. Also,I've noted discrepancies between the quantities of plants in the planting schedule and the quantities shown on the plan regarding the Burford Holly, the Willow Oak,the Wax Myrtle,the Nellie Stevens Holly,the Schip Laurel,and the Zelcova serrata. As you know,the ARB's conditions must be resolved before I can issue a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project.Let's meet to discuss the outstanding issues,as follows: 1. Please label the fencing on the site plan to clearly identify all wood fencing; and 2. Revise the planting plan to address the ARB's conditions,providing all plants on-site,and update the planting schedule. Sincerely, Margaret Maliszewski Design Planner cc: Duane Snow, 905 West Leigh Dnve, Charlottesville,VA 22901 ✓Yadira Amarante File DW Enterprises v • 4686 Garth Road •Crozet,Va 22932 (434)823-2815 nflsi16(a Juno corn March 12, 2005 Ms. Yadira Amarante Community Development Department 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Va. 22902-4596 Re: Snow's Offices and Storage Yards I would like to request a waiver of the common dumpster area for the referenced project since each building tenant is responsible for their own trash services as stated in note #18 on the site plan. Your agreement and support of this request for a waiver would be appreciated. Thanking you in advance for your approval. David C. Wyant, P. E. J* /,1%S RECEIVED MAR 11 2005 COMMUNITY©EVELOPM,FiNT Review Comments Project Name: Snows Rental Units Final-Residential-Commission Date Completed: Friday, March 04, 2005 Reviewer: Gary Whelan Department/Division/Agency ACSA Reviews Comments Hey Yadira, The Service Authority grants final approval for Snow's Rental Units -Gary Review Status' Administrative Approval Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed Oi Tuesday, March 08, Review Comments Project Name: Snows Rental Units Date Completed. Friday, July 16, 2004 Reviewer Margaret Maliszewski Department/Division/Agency ARB Reviews Comments No expiration date was given for the ARB action on the original request for the SP. No changes to the ARB Guidelines have occurred since then.Add'I ARB review is not req'd at this time. The original ARB conditions recommended for the SP remain valid Review Status: Administrative Approval Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed Oi Tuesday, March 08, May 28,2002 A91 eisA co.( iteep) ( David Wyant 4686 Garth Road Crozet,VA 22932 RE: ARB-2002-31 Snow's Offices and Storage Yard;Tax Map 90,Parcel 35 Dear Mr.Wyant: The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board reviewed the above noted item at its meeting on Monday,May 20,2002.The Board expressed no objection to the special use permit subject to the following conditions: 1.The height of stored items shall be limited to 8' in the front row of storage areas(the row closest to Avon Street)and m the southernmost storage area in the back row. 2.Eight(8')high solid wood fencing of a design that meets ARB approval shall be used for the north and south perimeters of the front row of storage yards,the portions of fencing that connect storage yards m the front row,and the southern side of the southernmost storage yard in the back row. 3.Chain link fence shall not be visible from the EC. 4.Landscaping of a design that meets ARB approval shall be used to soften the appearance of the development and to integrate the site. The board unanimously approved a Certificate of Appropriateness for the site plan,pending staff administrative approval of the followmg conditions. 1.Remove note#3 ("fence will be chain link with brown diagonal slats")from the site plan sheet. 2.Remove all references to the freestanding signs from the plans. Submit a separate application at a later date.No signs will be included in approvals for this site plan. 3.Revise the proposed topography in the parking area of the southern storage yard(front row).If a retaining wall will be required,show it and provide details on height,materials,appearance,etc. 4.Regarding the landscaping: a)Create a more informal,evergreen planting m the southwest corner of the site. This planting should tie m with the proposed 4-season buffer and the Leyland Cypress Plants should be placed in a mixed mass planting rather than planted in rows(single or staggered)of single species. b)The planting at the front of the site should provide continuous screemng.Add plants accordingly. c)Show on the plan the Dwarf Burford Holly that is included in the landscape key. d)Revise the spacing of the white pmes m the vicinity of the rip rap trench on the south side of the site to 15' on center. e)Revise the spacing of the schip laurel to 5' on center. 5.The fence shall be stained to match the building. 6.There shall be no pomts on the fence rail. Please provide revised drawings or other information addressing each of these conditions at your earliest convenience.Include a memo indicating how each condition has been satisfied If changes other than those requested have been made,identify those changes in the memo also.When staffs review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met,a Certificate of Appropnateness may be issued. If you have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Margaret Maliszewski Design Planner MM/j cf cc: File Yadira Amarante February 28,2005 Response to Yadira's comments. From: David Wyant p rl MAR 3 2005 i? COMMO► i Y DEVELOPM �- trip COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Division of Zoning and Current Development MEMORANDUM TO: David Wyant FROM: Yadira Amarante, Senior Planner DATE: August 20,2004 RE: SDP 04-057 Snow's Rental Units Final(Prior to Preliminary) Site Plan (Revised 7/23/04) The Albemarle County Department of Planning and Community Development will approve the final site plan referenced above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed: [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference.] 1. [4.12.6] I checked with Amelia and all the parking you are showing (the spaces inside the fences)all must be counted toward your parking which takes you way over the 20% limit. Amelia suggested that you may want to reconsider how you are calculating the required parking. She felt it would not be out of the ordinary if you calculated for 2 or 3 employees and/or 2 or 3 service vehicles given the office and contractor nature of the use. Response: Under Site Development Data I have indicated a change in the number of required parking spaces for employee parking and service vehicle parking as suggested by Amelia. I kept the 1 handicap parking space per unit. 2. [4.12.13.e] The dumpster will not work at the proposed location. The dumpster should be located so that it can be serviced by a truck. Response:I eliminated the common dumpster since we have one for each tenant as indicated in Note #18. 3. [4.12.19.b] Also, show that the dumpster pad will extend at least 8' beyond the front of the dumpster. 4. [4.12.19.c] Illustrate how the dumpster will be screened(materials, height, etc.). 5. [Note] Note#18 under"General Construction Notes" states that refuse will be the responsibility of each tenant. If the applicant does not want to provide a dumpster for the entire parcel/site then you can request a waiver of the dumpster requirement from the Zoning Administrator per Section 4.12.13.f of the Zoning Ordinance. Response: Waiver letter for dumpster requirement has been provided with this submittal. 6. [30.6] Approval is subject to the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Architectural Review Board. Response: This project has been through ARB and waits for the approval letter. 7. [32.5.6.s] Submit a plat showing: travelway access & sidewalk easements and temporary construction easements on TMP 90-35Y. The approval and recordation of this plat is required prior to site plan approval. How else are we to ensure that this parcel will have a legal access from a public road? Response:An entrance easement was submitted several weeks ago to the staff for the county attorney's review and approval. 8. [32.6.6(j)] [4.17.4(b)] Include a photometric plan on the site plan demonstrating that parking area luminaires are in compliance with 4.17.4 b. Sorry, I should have mentioned this before. Response:Page 4 is the photometric plan for the project. 9. [32.7.2.8] Safe and Convenient Access; Circulation; Pedestrian Ways; Parking Loading. Provision shall be made for sidewalks and pedestrian walkways which will enable pedestrians to walk safely and conveniently between buildings on the site and from the site to adjacent property... - Either extend the concrete sidewalk along the western edge of the new driveway all the way to the nursery on TMP 90-35Y or end it at the property line. If the applicant is not planning to construct a sidewalk all the way to the nursery, then remove it from the plan. Response: The sidewalk has been removed on parcel 90-35Y. 10. [32.7.9.4.b] All trees, which will not be removed for construction must be protected through Conservation Plan measures and must be shown on the Landscape Plan. I have included a Conservation Plan Checklist for you to follow. Please do and show everything listed on the checklist and then place a signed checklist on the plan. Item 1 on the Conservation Plan Checklist states that you have to show everything listed on the plan. Response: The conservation plan is on sheet 1 of the plan. A protective fence is shown around the trees to be saved. Please contact Yadira Amarante at 296-5823 ext. 3297 if you have any questions. 2 Albemarle County • Service Auth èri ty Serving•Conserving November 12,2004 David Wyant,P.E. 4686 Garth Road Crozet,Virginia 22932 Re: Snow's Storage Yard Dear Mr.Wyant: The plan, entitled Snow's Storage Yard dated October 10, 2002, last revised March 11, 2003, is hereby approved for construction. One set of the approved plan is enclosed for your records. Any previously approved plans are voided with this approval. This approval is for basic compliance with the General Water& Sewer Construction Specifications of the Albemarle County Service Authority and does not relieve the contractor from responsibility for his work as it relates to the plan and specifications. The Albemarle County Service Authority requires that a copy of the approved construction plan be on the job site. It is the contractor's responsibility to mark up a copy of the approved construction plan showing as-built information and to provide this data to your client at the completion of utility installation. The final as-built plan shall be submitted in a digital format. A preconstruction conference shall be scheduled with the project manager to ensure coordination and answer any questions. This will be a short meeting to review the project, materials, test methods, and schedule, in order to expedite construction. Please have the proper party call me at 977-4511 to schedule the meeting. This approval is valid for a period of eighteen(18)months from this date. If construction is not in progress at the end of this period,the approval shall be void. If you have any questions or if we can be of assistance,please advice us. Sincerely, 960/ 27 4 Jeremy M. Lynn Civil Engineer cc: Owner State Health Dept. lanning Dept. Bldg.Codes&Zoning Services Soil Erosion Inspector Jay Thomas,ACSA Inspector 168 Spotnap Road • P.O. Box 2738 • Charlottesville, VA 22902 • Tel (434) 977-4511 • Fax (434) 979-0698 www.acsanet.com (t=.O , RECEIVED 475 _. (21' NOV 16 2004 :OMMUN1 ,DEVELOPMENT Yadira Q. Amarante, Senior Planner County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Countyof Albemarle Division of Zoning and Current Development 401 McIntire Road Department Community Charlottesville, VA 22902 Phone: (434) 296-5832 ext. 3297 Development Fax: (434) 972-4126 Email: yamarant@albemarle.org Fax To: David Wyant From: Yadira Amarante Fax: (434)823-5102 Pages: Phone: Date: 8/24/04 Re: Comments for Snow's CC: See attached. 01,AL lil':II 47,G1Nt, COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Division of Zoning and Current Development MEMORANDUM TO: David Wyant FROM: Yadira Amarante, Senior Planner DATE: August 20,2004 RE: SDP 04-057 Snow's Rental Units Final (Prior to Preliminary) Site Plan (Revised 7/23/04) The Albemarle County Department of Planning and Community Development will approve the final site plan referenced above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed: [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference.) 4.12.6] I checked with Amelia and all the parking you are showing(the spaces inside the fences) all must be counted toward your parking which takes you way over the 20%limit. Amelia suggested that you may want to reconsider how you are calculating the required parking. She felt it would not be out of the ordinary if calculated for 2 or 3 employees and/or 2 or 3 service vehicles given the office and contractor nature f the use. . [4.12.13.e] The dumpster will not work at the proposed loc tion. The dumpste should be located so that it can be serviced by a truck. C '�fv� h0.- a; (15 re3d;r2 d M f -e.- - iv [4.12.19.b] Also, show that the dumpster pad i 1 extend at least 8' beyond the front of the dumpster. 4.12.19.c] Illustrate how the dumpster will be screened(materials,height, etc.). . [Note] Note#18 under"General Construction Notes" states that refuse will be the responsibility of each tenant. If the applicant does not want to provide a dumpster for the entire parcel/site then you can request a fiver of the dumpster requirement from the Zoning Administrator per Section 4.12.13.f of the Zoning Ordinance. . [30.6] Approval is subject to the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Architectural Review '- Board. --5N7. [32.5.6.s] Submit a plat showing: travelway access & sidewalk easements and temporary construction easements on TMP 90-35Y. The approval and recordation of this plat is required prior to site plan approval. w else are we to ensure that this parcel will have a legal access from a public road? . [32.6.6(j)] [4.17.4(b)] Include a photometric plan on the site plan demonstrating that parking area luminaires e in compliance with 4.17.4 b. Sorry, I should have mentioned this before. . [32.7.2.8] Safe and Convenient Access; Circulation;Pedestrian Ways; Parking Loading. Provision shall be made for sidewalks and pedestrian walkways which will enable pedestrians to walk safely and conveniently between buildings on the site and from the site to adjacent property... - Either extend the concrete sidewalk along the western edge of the new driveway all the way to the ursery on TMP 90-35Y or end it at the property line. If the applicant is not planning to construct a sidewalk all the way to the nursery, then remove it from the plan. 1 . [32.7.9.4.b] All trees,which will not be removed for construction must be protected through Conservation Plan measures and must be shown on the Landscape Plan. I have included a Conservation Plan Checklist for 1 Af siJ l (/011 cOW 05 12\ 516 you to follow. Please do and show everything listed on the checklist and then place a signed checklist on the plan. Item 1 on the Conservation Plan Checklist states that you have to show everything listed on the plan. Please contact Yadira Amarante at 296-5823 ext. 3297 if you have any questions. 2 1RGINP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development,Current Development Division Engineering Plan Review From: Glenn Brooks Subject: Snows Rental Units(plan titled Snows Storage Yard), fmal site plan submitted for site review instead of preliminary Date plan received: 16 Jun 2004, 30 Jul 2004 Date of comment: 29 Jun 2004,9 Aug 2004 Site Review comments have been addressed. The fmal site plan will be reviewed for remaining items when all applicable contents as outlined in the Design Manual section 902B are submitted, along with erosion control and stormwater management plans and computations. Copy: file SDP-2004-00057 File:El_psp_GEB_Snows Rental Units.doc ot5 VDOT Comments Jim Kesterson 8/16/04 SDP 04-057 Snow's Rental Units Final Glenn, The above referenced plan has been reviewed, the following are our comments. 1. The entrance is not shown on this plan. Previous comments indicated the radii should be 35' and CG-12 handicap ramps need to be shown. 2. The face of curb offset from centerline should be 26'. 3. Previous comments indicated the curb taper needed to be removed and could be painted. 4. Who will enforce the construction for the frontage improvements?A note on the plans states the new lane will be constructed after 6 units are built. Jim Kesterson 01, Cofq \nclAg 0 , 5"9 et( 17' k lob ACSA Comments Gary Whelan 8/16/04 SDP 04-057 Snows Rental Units Final Yadira-The Service Authority grants preliminary approval for Snow's Rental Units. Final approval will not be granted until: 1 . Provide plumbing information to size meter. 2. Show connection to existing water main. Gary Tracking #: F91 D9CBC2F50804285B72F8A7F77A0DA74875032 \ 4 \ o' loak,e Giorq Of5D? �r 1 \o6 E911 Comments Andrew Slack 8/9/04 SDP 04-057 Snow's Rental Units Final THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONTACT THIS OFFICE FOR ROAD NAME RECOMMENDATIONS. THE APPLICANT SHOULD HAVE A LIST OF THREE (3) ROAD NAMES FOR APPROVAL BEFORE CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. )UNTY OF ALBEMARLE Division or coning and Current Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 • Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone: (434) 296-5832 • Fax: (434) 972-4126 43. ++ Transmittal From: Yadira Amarante �C O I 10 04 Date: 7/30/04 To: Glenn Brooks - Engineering Review .G 81'i !04 Charles Proctor - VDOT 1.C. 81/W01 f Jay Schlothauer - Building Re.V.ret iffpavej Gary Whelan - ACSA g.0 8f,o log • ,,Andrew Slack - E911 Review kC 6\4 `04 Job #/File Name: SDP 04-057 Snow's Rental Units Final Site Plan (Prior to Preliminary We are sending you the following items: Fl Attached Under separate cover n Copy of Letter M Plans ri Plats n Other # of Copies Date Description 1 7/23/04 Revised Site Plan 1 7/26/04 Response to your comments (for some of you) These are transmitted as checked below: n For review and comments Fi For approval n Other Remarks: This plan should address your SRC comments. Comments are due in CityView or email by: 8/9/04 Signature: Yadira q. amargnit Yadira Amarante From: David C Wyant[nflsj16@Juno corn] Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 12:33 PM To: YAMARANT@albemarle.org Subject: Duane Snow's Site Plan I will not be able to resubmit the subject site plan today. I should have the next version in your office by Friday. Thanks, David Wyant Tr C 1 N COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Division of Zoning and Current Development MEMORANDUM TO: David Wyant RECEIVED FROM: Yadira Amarante, Senior Planner JUL. gh 2004 DATE: July 7, 2004 RE: SDP 04-057-Snow's Rental Units Final Site Plan(Prior to Prelim r'UNITY D VL OPM NT The Albemarle County Department of Planning and Community Development will approve the final site plan referenced above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed: [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference.] 1. [4.12.6] The parking requirements have changed since this plan was last reviewed. Since the approval has expired, this project must meet the new parking regulations. The new requirements for Contractor parking is: 1 space per employee assigned to work on site plus 1 space per facility vehicle. Please change the parking accordingly. I realize that it may be difficult to assess how many facility vehicles each renter will have but you can call Keith Lancaster at 296-5832 x3024 if you need assistance in coming up with numbers that make sense. RESPONSE: The calculations have been changed as well as the note on the plan. 2. [4.12.13.e] At least one dumpster and pad, meeting the requirements of Section 4.12.19 of the Zoning Ordinance must be provided. Also, show the pad dimensions and illustrate the dumpster screening method (materials, height, etc.) RESPONSE:A dumpster pad has been added 3. [4.12.16.c] All parking spaces must be 9' X 18'. There are many spaces on the plan which are 8' wide. RESPONSE:Parking space dimensions have been changed 4. [4.12.16.e] All parking spaces on this plan require bumper blocks. RESPONSE: Bumper blocks have been added 5. [4.17.4.2] Provide a cut sheet for all proposed lighting fixtures so that we can determine what the lumens will be. RESPONSE:A cut sheet of the light proposed has been included 6. [4.15.13] Be aware that all signs will require separate permits under 4.15 of the zoning ordinance. RESPONSE: The owner knows that a separate permit is required for signs. 7. [30.6] Approval is subject to the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Architectural Review Board. RESPONSE: Thanks. 8. [32.5.6.a] Under Site Development Data on Sheet 1, state who the developer of the project is. If the developer is the same as the owner, then indicate that on Sheet 1. RESPONSE: The developer has been added to the plan. 9. [32.5.6.a] Under Site Development Data on Sheet 1, include EC as a zoning district which means you can delete Note#25 under General Construction Notes. RESPONSE:EC was added to sheet 1 and note#25 was removed 1 ,. [32.5.6.a] Under Site Development D )n Sheet 1, state that those setbacks a so applicable from a • public r-o-w. This means you can delete Note#20 under General Construction Notes. RESPONSE:Setbacks were corrected and note#20 was removed 1. [32.5.6.a] Under Site Development Data on Sheet 1, state the proposed use of the units as"office buildings and storage yards." RESPONSE: The note was changed as suggested 12. [32.5.6.b] Move the parking information from General Construction Notes (#35 & #36)to Site Development Data. RESPONSE:Parking info was moved as suggested 13. [32.5.6.s] Submit a plat showing: travelway access & sidewalk easements and temporary construction easements on TMP 90-35Y. RESPONSE: With approval the plats will be provided 14. [32.7.2.8] Safe and Convenient Access; Circulation;Pedestrian Ways; Parking Loading. Provision shall be made for sidewalks and pedestrian walkways which will enable pedestrians to walk safely and conveniently between buildings on the site and from the site to adjacent property... - Extend the concrete sidewalk along Avon St. Ext. to and along the new entrance and then provide a crosswalk across the driveway to the proposed sidewalk on the other side of the driveway. Provide a physical end to this sidewalk at the boundary with TMP 90-35A1. - Either extend the concrete sidewalk along the western edge of the new driveway all the way to the nursery on TMP 90-35Y or end it at the property line. - Place curb ramps at each spot where a sidewalk meets a driveway, road, or travelway. RESPONSE: The sidewalk was removed as we discussed since there are no other sidewalks in the area. 15. [32.7.9.4.b] All trees, which will not be removed for construction must be protected through Conservation Plan measures and must be shown on the Landscape Plan. I have included a Conservation Plan Checklist for you to follow. Please do and show everything listed on the checklist and then place a signed checklist on the plan. RESPONSE: Checklist attached to sheet 1. 16. [32.7.9.7(b)] For the interior parking lot landscaping you are required to provide 4,711-s.f of landscaped area(not canopy, that's a separate requirement). The calculation used for this is "each tree or shrub located in reasonably dispersed planting islands or perimeter areas" gets 50-s.f., (I cannot count the Buford Holly because the Ordinance specifically says that shrubs adjacent to buildings can't count. The only plants I can count are 3 White Pines along the southern edge of the site giving you 50-s.f. X 3 = 150-s.f of interior landscaping.) Since engineering staff is requiring islands at the ends of the rows of parking, you can plant trees there. You will also need to provide trees within the parking areas inside the fences. The 1 large or medium shade tree per 10 spaces can be counted toward this requirement but they have to be near parking! RESPONSE: Trees were placed in the islands suggested by the engineer that meet this requirement A list of the trees are shown on sheet 1. 17. [32.7.9.9] The tree canopy calculation used is incorrect. Canopy required is 10% of the entire site(355,755 s.f. X .10= 35,575). I've reviewed your landscape schedule and found the following: I cannot use the Buford Hollies for canopy because they won't exceed 5' in height in 10 yrs. I can use everything else. I've adjusted your total canopy to reflect 36 Schip Laurels and 9 Yoshino Cherries to give us a grand total of 42,619. Please make these adjustments to the Landscaping Schedule on Sheet 1. RESPONSE: I corrected the numbers. Thanks. 18. [Recommendation] You should remove all landscaping which is not required by Ordinance or the ARB from the plan. Zoning Inspectors have to inspect everything shown on a site plan. If there is one Azalea missing the plan may be in violation. The owner can always add decorative landscaping at will but you only have to show what the County requires on a site plan. RESPONSE:All trees and shrubs are requested by ARB. 2 V[. Note] You are showing 36 Schip LE s on the plan but only accounting for ►n the schedule. .4- RESPONSE:I corrected the numbers. 20. [Note] You are showing 9 Yoshino Cherries on the plan but only accounting for 6 on the schedule. RESPONSE:I corrected the numbers Please contact Yadira Amarante at 296-5823 ext. 3297 if you have any questions. 3 4dWL 4.4'lle Asa; -41,FY COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Division of Zoning and Current Development MEMORANDUM TO: David Wyant RECEIVED FROM: Yadira Amarante, Senior Planner JUL, 46 204 DATE: July 7,2004 RE: SDP 04-057—Snow's Rental Units Final Site Plan(Prior to PreliMIllNITY P E_hQPME The Albemarle County Department of Planning and Community Development will approve the final site plan referenced above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed: [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference.] 1. [4.12.6] The parking requirements have changed since this plan was last reviewed. Since the approval has expired, this project must meet the new parking regulations. The new requirements for Contractor parking is: 1 space per employee assigned to work on site plus 1 space per facility vehicle. Please change the parking accordingly. I realize that it may be difficult to assess how many facility vehicles each renter will have but you can call Keith Lancaster at 296-5832 x3024 if you need assistance in coming up with numbers that make sense. RESPONSE: The calculations have been changed as well as the note on the plan. 2. [4.12.13.e] At least one dumpster and pad, meeting the requirements of Section 4.12.19 of the Zoning Ordinance must be provided. Also, show the pad dimensions and illustrate the dumpster screening method (materials, height, etc.) RESPONSE:A dumpster pad has been added 3. [4.12.16.c] All parking spaces must be 9' X 18'. There are many spaces on the plan which are 8' wide. RESPONSE:Parking space dimensions have been changed 4. [4.12.16.e] All parking spaces on this plan require bumper blocks. RESPONSE: Bumper blocks have been added 5. [4.17.4.2] Provide a cut sheet for all proposed lighting fixtures so that we can determine what the lumens will be. RESPONSE:A cut sheet of the light proposed has been included 6. [4.15.13] Be aware that all signs will require separate permits under 4.15 of the zoning ordinance. RESPONSE: The owner knows that a separate permit is required for signs. 7. [30.6] Approval is subject to the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Architectural Review Board. RESPONSE: Thanks. 8. [32.5.6.a]Under Site Development Data on Sheet 1, state who the developer of the project is. If the developer is the same as the owner, then indicate that on Sheet 1. RESPONSE: The developer has been added to the plan. 9. [32.5.6.a] Under Site Development Data on Sheet 1, include EC as a zoning district which means you can delete Note#25 under General Construction Notes. RESPONSE:EC was added to sheet 1 and note#25 was removed 1 [32.5.6.a]Under Site Development a on Sheet 1, state that those setback; also applicable from a , public r-o-w. This means you can delete Note#20 under General Construction Notes. RESPONSE:Setbacks were corrected and note#20 was removed 1. [32.5.6.a]Under Site Development Data on Sheet 1, state the proposed use of the units as"office buildings and storage yards." RESPONSE: The note was changed as suggested 12. [32.5.6.b]Move the parking information from General Construction Notes(#35 & #36)to Site Development Data. RESPONSE:Parking info was moved as suggested 13. [32.5.6.s] Submit a plat showing: travelway access & sidewalk easements and temporary construction easements on TMP 90-35Y. RESPONSE: With approval the plats will be provided 14. [32.7.2.8] Safe and Convenient Access; Circulation;Pedestrian Ways; Parking Loading. Provision shall be made for sidewalks and pedestrian walkways which will enable pedestrians to walk safely and conveniently between buildings on the site and from the site to adjacent property... - Extend the concrete sidewalk along Avon St. Ext. to and along the new entrance and then provide a crosswalk across the driveway to the proposed sidewalk on the other side of the driveway. Provide a physical end to this sidewalk at the boundary with TMP 90-35A1. - Either extend the concrete sidewalk along the western edge of the new driveway all the way to the nursery on TMP 90-35Y or end it at the property line. - Place curb ramps at each spot where a sidewalk meets a driveway, road, or travelway. RESPONSE: The sidewalk was removed as we discussed since there are no other sidewalks in the area. 15. [32.7.9.4.b] All trees, which will not be removed for construction must be protected through Conservation Plan measures and must be shown on the Landscape Plan. I have included a Conservation Plan Checklist for you to follow. Please do and show everything listed on the checklist and then place a signed checklist on the plan. RESPONSE: Checklist attached to sheet 1. 16. [32.7.9.7(b)] For the interior parking lot landscaping you are required to provide 4,711-s.f of landscaped area(not canopy, that's a separate requirement). The calculation used for this is "each tree or shrub located in reasonably dispersed planting islands or perimeter areas" gets 50-s.f, (I cannot count the Buford Holly because the Ordinance specifically says that shrubs adjacent to buildings can't count. The only plants I can count are 3 White Pines along the southern edge of the site giving you 50-s.f X 3 = 150-s.f of interior landscaping.) Since engineering staff is requiring islands at the ends of the rows of parking, you can plant trees there. You will also need to provide trees within the parking areas inside the fences. The 1 large or medium shade tree per 10 spaces can be counted toward this requirement but they have to be near parking! RESPONSE: Trees were placed in the islands suggested by the engineer that meet this requirement A list of the trees are shown on sheet 1. 17. [32.7.9.9] The tree canopy calculation used is incorrect. Canopy required is 10% of the entire site(355,755 s.f. X .10=35,575). I've reviewed your landscape schedule and found the following: I cannot use the Buford Hollies for canopy because they won't exceed 5' in height in 10 yrs. I can use everything else. I've adjusted your total canopy to reflect 36 Schip Laurels and 9 Yoshino Cherries to give us a grand total of 42,619. Please make these adjustments to the Landscaping Schedule on Sheet 1. RESPONSE:I corrected the numbers. Thanks. 18. [Recommendation] You should remove all landscaping which is not required by Ordinance or the ARB from the plan. Zoning Inspectors have to inspect everything shown on a site plan. If there is one Azalea missing the plan may be in violation. The owner can always add decorative landscaping at will but you only have to show what the County requires on a site plan. RESPONSE:All trees and shrubs are requested by ARB. 2 - ,Note] You are showing 36 Schip I gs on the plan but only accounting fc 'on the schedule. RESPONSE:I corrected the numbers. 20. [Note] You are showing 9 Yoshino Cherries on the plan but only accounting for 6 on the schedule. RESPONSE:I corrected the numbers Please contact Yadira Amarante at 296-5823 ext. 3297 if you have any questions. 3 ' cf gad, COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE REMVED Department of Community Development,Current Development Division Engineering Plan Review JUL 26 1004 From: Glenn Brooks Subject: Snows Rental Units(plan titled Snows Storage Yard),final site plan sucalititiNiTY DEVELOPMENT review instead of preliminary Date plan received: 16 Jun 2004 Date of comment: 29 Jun 2004 Final site plans require all applicable contents as outlined in the Design Manual section 902B. This is not a comprehensive review,as computations,and final plan details were not provided. 1. Please update the existing topography. It does not appear to be accurate. [32.5.6d] RESPONSE:Existing topography has been checked and changes are shown. 2. Please provide easements for off site grading as shown on the plan,and for an access easement for the entry from the neighboring property. [DM 1102] RESPONSE:All easements are being worked on by surveyor and will be provided if plan is approved 3. Curbing is required in parking areas and travelways according to Zoning Ordinance section 4.12.15.g. RESPONSE:Curbing has been added and drainage pattern has been changed 4. The circulation around the buildings and parking will require revision to provide the required 100'of sight distance and protection for parked vehicles. [18-4.12.l5f, 18-32.7.2] This can be accomplished in large part by the use of curbed islands at the end of parking rows and corners of buildings. A sketch is provided below for clarification, RESPONSE:Islands are provided and sight distance is available around buildings. e \\N-- T 4) 5. The entrance travelway should have a turning radius which can accommodate trucks. It does not appear that the right-angled turn would accommodate a truck. [18-32.7.2] RESPONSE:Radius of entrance has been changed 6. The stormsewer should not run under the building as proposed on the northeast side of the site,as it renders the pipe unmaintainable. It is recommended that the stormsewer be routed around the building. [DM505, 18-32.6.6] RESPONSE:Storm sewer alignment has been changed and an addition yard grate has been added 7. The water quality swales proposed at the pipe discharge points do not appear to be in flat enough locations to work. However,the biofilter and detention basin concept at the rear of the site appears adequate as a preliminary concept. It will require a forebay to capture sediment,gravel and fines from the site, as well as vehicle access to the forebay,dam and outlet structures, and 3:1 slopes within the basin. Some form of curbing,channel,or berm to a slc -ain should be provided over the rear slop....back of the storage yards to prevent slope erosion and channel runoff to the basin. [18-32.5.6k,VSMH,Design Manual chapter 5] RESPONSE: Water quality swales have been removed Calculations will be provided with final Copy: file SDP-2004-00057 File:El_psp_GEB_Snows Rental Units.doc COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 701 VDOT WAY PHILIP A.SHUCET CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22911 JAMES L. BRYAN COMMISSIONER RESIDENT ENGINEER TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21srCENTURY July 8, 2004 Glenn Brooks Department of Engineer and Development RECEIVED 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 f, JUL 26 2004 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT's comments from the site review meeting held June 22, 2004 at the Charlottesville Residency office. SDP 2004-00057 Snow's Rental Units (Yadria Amarante) § Sight Distances needs to be shown; RESPONSE:Sight distance added to plan. § Entrance needs to be designed in accordance with the Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highway. Increase entrance radi to 35'; RESPONSE:Entrance note added § Full Frontage improvements need to be continued to the South property boundary. No taper is required at the southern end Taper can marked with pavement markings; RESPONSE:Full frontage improvements shown. § All easements need to be shown; RESPONSE:All easements are shown. § Drainage computations are required; RESPONSE: There are no pipes on VDOT affected by this project. The project is at the top of a hill and VDOT will drain some on this parcel § Recommend internal driveway be check to determine adequacy for delivery/moving trucks; RESPONSE:Radius of internal corners have been increased § Need to add CG-12's to entrance radi. RESPONSE:CG-12's are added Yadira Q. Amarante, Senior Planner County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Countyof Albemarle Division of Zoning and Current Development 401 McIntire Road Department Community Charlottesville, VA 22902 Phone: (434) 296-5823 ext. 3297 Development Fax: (434) 972-4012 Email: yamarant@albemarle.org Fax To: Duane Snow From: Yadira Amarante And Corbin or Jonas Fax: (434)295.2150 Pages: 12 Phone: Date: 7/7/2004 Re: Comments for Snows CC: Hi, I still don't have VDOT comments but I will forward them on.Thank you. Yadira Q. Amarante, Senior Planner County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Countyof Albemarle Division of Zoning and Current Development 401 McIntire Road Department Community Charlottesville, VA 22902 Phone: (434) 296-5823 ext. 3297 Development Fax: (434) 972-4012 Email: yamarant@albemarle.org Fax To: Dave Wyant From: Yadira Amarante Fax: (434)823-5102 Pages: 2 Phone: Date: 7/7/2004 Re: Comments for Snows(correction) CC: Hi Dave, Please replace the E911 comment I just sent you with this one.Thank you. Yadira Q. Amarante, Senior Planner County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Countyof Albemarle Division of Zoning and Current Development 401 McIntire Road Department Community Charlottesville,VA 22902 Phone: (434) 296-5823 ext. 3297 Development Fax: (434) 972-4012 Email: yamarant@albemarle.org Fax To: Dave Wyant From: Yadira Amarante Fax: (434)823-5102 Pages: (a Phone: Date: 7/7/2004 Re: Comments for Snows CC: Hi Dave, I still don't have VDOT comments. 1 • OF A te24.7ii‘ COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 (434)296-5823 Fax(434)972-4012 July 6,2004 David Wyant,P.E. David Wyant Engineering 4686 Garth Road Crozet,VA 22932 Re: SDP 04-057—Snow's Rental Units Final Site Plan (prior to Preliminary) Dear Dave: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary comments from the following agencies,as applicable,are attached. Albemarle County Current Development Division:Planning,Engineering&Zoning Review Albemarle County Planning Division: E911 Mappmg,Historic'Resources, and AR1i Review Albemarle County Building Inspections Division• Albemarle County Fire/Rescue Division. Virginia Department of Transportation Albemarle County Service Authority I Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed,and should not be considered final. However,the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues pertaining to the approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions which have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions,please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit seven full size copies and one 11"x 1 7" copy to the Department of Plannmg and Community Development. Responses to the attached comments of the Site Review Committee must be submitted by Monday,July 19,2004.Failure to submit this mformation by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. kardenio?lanner a Attachments: Site Review Comments OF AL ��RctN�P COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Division of Zoning and Current Development MEMORANDUM TO: David Wyant FROM: Yadira Amarante, Senior Planner DATE: July 7,2004 RE: SDP 04-057—Snow's Rental Units Final Site Plan(Prior to Preliminary) The Albemarle County Department of Planning and Community Development will approve the final site plan referenced above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed:[Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference. 1123\04 ,5;ons 1. [4.12.6] The parking requirements have changed since this plan was last reviewed. Since the approval has expired, this project must meet the new parking regulations. The new requirements for Contractor parking is: 1 space per employee assigned to work on site plus 1 space per facility vehicle. Please change the parking accordingly. I realize that it may be difficult to assess how many facility vehicles each renter will have but you can call Keith Lancaster at 296-5832 x3024 if you need assistance in coming up with numbers that make sense. __A>2. [4.12.13.e] At least one dumpster and pad,meeting the requirements of Section 4.12.19 of the Zoning viriti -.t, Ordinance must be provided. Also, show the pad dimensions and illustrate the dumpster screening method (materials,height, etc.) Y [4.12.16.c] All parking spaces must be 9' X 18'. There are many spaces on the plan which are 8' wide. �1- [4.12.16.e] All parking spaces on this plan require bumper blocks. fs [4.17.4.2] Provide a cut sheet for all proposed lighting fixtures so that we can determine what the lumens 044 will be. '[4.15.13] Be aware that all signs will require separate permits under 4.15 of the zoning ordinance. �7. [30.6] Approval is subject to the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Architectural Review Board. „84 [32.5.6.a] Under Site Development Data on Sheet 1, state who the developer of the project is. If the developer is the same as the owner,then indicate that on Sheet 1. [32.5.6.a] Under Site Development Data on Sheet 1, include EC as a zoning district which means you can delete Note#25 under General Construction Notes. [32.5.6.a] Under Site Development Data on Sheet 1, state that those setbacks are also applicable from a public r-o-w. This means you can delete Note#20 under General Construction Notes. ..1,1/:[32.5.6.a] Under Site Development Data on Sheet 1, state the proposed use of the units as"office buildings d storage yards." .k2. [32.5.6.b] Move the parking information from General Construction Notes (#35 &#36)to Site Development Data. [32.5.6.s] Submit a plat showing: travelway access &sidewalk easements and temporary construction easements on TMP 90-35Y. 1 14. [32.7..2.8] Safe and Convenient Access; Circulation;Pedestrian Ways; Parking Loading. Provision shall be made for sidewalks and pedestrian walkways which will enable pedestrians to walk safely and conveniently b�e een buildings on the site and from the site to adjacent property... rod Extend the concrete sidewalk along Avon St. Ext. to and along the new entrance and then provide a m1a rosswalk across the driveway to the proposed sidewalk on the other side of the driveway. Provide a physical end to this sidewalk at the boundary with TMP 90-35A1. - - Either extend the concrete sidewalk along the western edge of the new driveway all the way to the ursery on TMP 90-35Y or end it at the property line. ge"ta t Prbeasea.s&eweLoc on norSei 1 free lace curb ramps at each spot where a sidewalk meets a driveway,road, or travelway. ---- 15. [32.7.9.4.b] All trees, which will not be removed for construction must be protected through Conservation Plan measures and must be shown on the Landscape Plan. I have included a Conservation Plan Checklist for you to follow. Please do and show everything listed on the checklist and then place a signed checklist on the plan. 6. [32.7.9.7(b)] For the interior parking lot landscaping you are required to provide 4,711-s.f. of landscaped area(not canopy,that's a separate requirement). The calculation used for this is "each tree or shrub located in reasonably dispersed planting islands or perimeter areas" gets 50-s.f., (I cannot count the Buford Holly because the Ordinance specifically says that shrubs adjacent to buildings can't count. The only plants I can count are 3 White Pines along the southern edge of the site giving you 50-s.f. X 3 = 150-s.f. of interior landscaping.) Since engineering staff is requiring islands at the ends of the rows of parking, you can plant trees there. You will also need to provide trees within the parking areas inside the fences. The 1 large or edium shade tree per 10 spaces can be counted toward this requirement but they have to be near parking! 7. [32.7.9.9] The tree canopy calculation used is incorrect. Canopy required is 10% of the entire site(355,755 s.f. X .10=35,575). I've reviewed your landscape schedule and found the following: I cannot use the Buford Hollies for canopy because they won't exceed 5' in height in 10 yrs. I can use everything else. I've adjusted your total canopy to reflect 36 Schip Laurels and 9 Yoshino Cherries to give us a grand total of 42,619. Please make these adjustments to the Landscaping Schedule on Sheet 1. j8. [Recommendation] You should remove all landscaping which is not required by Ordinance or the ARB 0 from the plan. Zoning Inspectors have to inspect everything shown on a site plan. If there is one Azalea ( 4 missing the plan may be in violation. The owner can always add decorative landscaping at will but you only V have to show what the County requires on a site plan. 4.9. [Note] You are showing 36 Schip Laurels on the plan but only accounting for 17 on the schedule. LA0. [Note] You are showing 9 Yoshino Cherries on the plan but only accounting for 6 on the schedule. Please contact Yadira Amarante at 296-5823 ext. 3297 if you have any questions. 2 CONS] CATION PLAN CHECKLIST (Handbook, p_ -284-111-297 for complete specifications) • ❑ 1. The following items shall be shown on the plan: Trees to be saved; Limits of clearing(outside drip line of trees to be saved); Location and type of protective fencing; - Grade changes_requiring-tree-wells-or--walls; - --- - -- -- --- Proposed trenching or tunneling beyond the limits of clearing. ❑ 2. Markings: All trees to be saved shall be marked with print or ribbon at a height clearly visible to equipment operators. No grading shall begin until the tree marking has been inspected and approved by a County Inspector. ❑ 3. Pre-Construction Conference: Tree preservation and protection measures shall be reviewed with the contractor on site. ❑ 4. EauiR_ment Operation and Storage: Heavy equipment,vehicular traffic and storage of construction materials including soil shall not be permitted within the driplines of trees to be saved. ❑ 5. Soil Erosion and Stormwater Detention Devices: Such devices shall not adversely affect trees to be saved. ❑ 6. Fires: Fires are not permitted within 100 feet of the dripeline of trees to be saved. ❑ 7. Toxic Materials: Toxic materials shall not be stored within 100 feet of the dripline of trees to be saved. ❑ 8. Protective Fencing: Trees to be retained within 40 feet of a proposed building or grading activity shall be protected by fencing. Fencing shall be in place and shall be inspected and approved by a County Inspector prior to grading or construction. Cl 9. Tree Wells: When the ground level must be raised within the dripline of a tree to be saved,a tree well shall be provided and a construction detail submitted for approval. ❑ 10. Tree Walls: When the ground level must be lowered within the dripline of a tree to be saved,a tree wall shall be provided;and a construction detail submitted for approval. ❑ 11. Trenching and Tunneling: When trenching is required within the limits of clearing, it shall be done as far away from the trunks of trees as possible. Tunneling under a large tree shall be considered as an alternative when it is anticipated that necessary trenching will destroy feeder roots. ❑ 12. Cleanup: Protective fencing shall be the last items removed during the final cleanup. ❑ 13. Damaged Trees: Damaged trees shall be treated immediately by pruning, fertilization or other methods recommended by a tree specialist. NOTE:IT IS THE DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONFER WITH THE CONTRACTOR ON TREE CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS. OWNER SIGNATURE (DATE) CONTRACT PURCHASER SIGNATURE (DATE) YwP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development,Current Development Division Engineering Plan Review From: Glenn Brooks Subject: Snows Rental Units(plan titled Snows Storage Yard), final site plan submitted for site review instead of preliminary Date plan received: 16 Jun 2004 Date of comment: 29 Jun 2004 Final site plans require all applicable contents as outlined in the Design Manual section 902B. This is not a comprehensive review, as computations,and final plan details were not provided. 1. Please update the existing topography. It does not appear to be accurate. [32.5.6d] 2. Please provide easements for off-site grading as shown on the plan, and for an access easement for the entry from the neighboring property. [DM1102] 3. Curbing is required in parking areas and travelways according to Zoning Ordinance section 4.12.15.g. 4. The circulation around the buildings and parking will require revision to provide the required 100'of sight distance and protection for parked vehicles. [18-4.12.15f, 18-32.7.2]This can be accomplished in large part by the use of curbed islands at the end of parking rows and corners of buildings. A sketch is provided below for clarification. \\\ r _ aye IAL40.10 Al YN4A-.wf1 Rwr 5. The entrance travelway should have a turning radius which can accommodate trucks. It does not appear that the nght-angled turn would accommodate a truck. [18-32.7.2] 6. The stormsewer should not run under the building as proposed on the northeast side of the site, as it renders the pipe unmaintainable. It is recommended that the stormsewer be routed around the building. [DM505, 18-32.6.6] 7. The water quality swales proposed at the pipe discharge pomts do not appear to be in flat enough locations to work. However, the biofilter and detention basin concept at the rear of the site appears adequate as a preliminary concept. It will require a forebay to capture sediment, gravel and fines from the site,as well as vehicle access to the forebay, dam and outlet structures, and 3:1 slopes within the basin. Some form of curbing, channel,or berm to a slope drain should be provided over the rear slope in back of the storage yards to prevent slope erosion and channel runoff to the basin. [18-32.5.6k, VSMH,Design Manual chapter 5] Copy: file SDP-2004-00057 File:El_psp_GEB_Snows Rental Units.doc E. 6) 1A Site Review Comments Project Name ,Snows Rental Units I Project Number [1,472.00 I DateCompleted_ Wednesday, July 07, 2004 Reviewer Andrew Slack I Reviews Comment Is it necessary for all of the structures shown on the plan to have seperate addresses or will there be one I central office for an address to be assigned? Review Status 1 Pending Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed Oi Wednesday,July 07 Z." COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Planning&Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 218 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 (434)296 - 5823 Ext.3336 Fax(434) 972—4012 MEMORANDUM TO: Yadria Amarante FROM: Julie Mahon DATE: July 7,2004 RE: SDP 2004-00057 Snow's Rental Units—Histonc Resources Review The above referenced submittal has been reviewed for possible impact to known historic(fifty years old or older)architectural resources and known or potential archaeological resources with the following results: 1. The Virginia Department of Historic Resources' (DHR)Historic Resource Data Sharing System(DSS)has no surveyed historic architectural or archaeological sites identified on Tax Map 90,Parcel 35 as of July 6,2004. 2. Adjacent to and in the surrounding area of the project area are the following resources considered to be historic accordmg to DSS: a. 002-0558(TMP 90-33A/90-34)—Mayo Chapel built c. 1830;rural church with twentieth century additions; cemetery. b. 002-1141 (TMP uncertain)—Midvale School built c. 1936(located to the southwest along Avon Street Extended). DHR has not evaluated either of the above-mentioned histonc resources for eligibility for listing on the Virginia Landmarks Register or the National Register of Historic Places.Furthermore,the Mayo Chapel has undergone extensive renovations during the twentieth century that may have compromised the historic integrity of the building. The historic resources data outlined above was unavailable for the previous review of this project(SP2001-46).However,the Architectural Review Board(ARB)conditions pertaining to required fencing and landscaping appears to sufficiently mitigate potential negative impacts the project may have on the historic resources m the area.Therefore,we recommend that the applicant follows the ARB conditions previously identified. rb Site Review Comments Project Name Snows Rental Units Project Number 1,472.00 I DateCompleted_ Wednesday, June 23, 2004 Reviewer M. Maliszewski I Reviews Comment ''A Certificate of Appropriateness from the ARB is required prior to final site plan approval. Review Status Pending I Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed OP Wednesday, July 07 ? \ci)n,9 ?0; Site Review Comments Project Name Snows Rental Units Project Number 1,472 00 I DateCompleted_ Wednesday,July 07,2004 Reviewer Jay Schlothauer I Reviews Comment Review Status Administrative Approval Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed 01 Wednesday, July 07 I e scut Site Review Comments Project Name Snows Rental Units Project Number 1,472.00 I DateCompleted_ lWednesday,July 07,2004 I Reviewer Jay Schlothauer I Reviews Comment 'Pursuant to David Wyant's letter to Jay Schlothauer, dated March 30, 2002, add a note to the plan indicating that"all buildings will be of non-combustible construction". Review Status Requested Changes Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed CI Wednesday,July 07 Albemarle County Service Auth órit y ,----;---. -----------,- Sing•Conserving TO: Yadira Amarante, Planner FROM: Gary Whelan, Engineering Technician DATE: July 8, 2004 RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: Snow' s Rental Units (TM 90, Parcel 35) The below checked items apply to this site. SDP-2004-00057 X 1 . This site plan is within the Authority' s jurisdictional area for: X A. Water and sewer B. Water only C. Water only to existing structure D. Limited service X 2 . An 8 inch water line is located approximately 215' distant . 3 . Fire flow from nearest public hydrant, located distant from this site plan, is gpm + at 20 psi residual . X 4 . An 8 inch sewer line is proposed onsite. 5 . An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed. X 6 . No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future easements . 7 . and plans are currently under review. X 8 . Sewer plans have been received and approved. 9 . No plans are required. 10 . Final and plans are required for our review and approval prior to granting tentative approval . 11 . Final site plan may/may not be signed. 12 . RWSA approval for water and/or sewer connections . Comments : Provide plumbing fixture info. Show water meter locations. Backflow device required. Show connection to existing water main. The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows : X meter locations waterline size waterline locations sewer line size sewer line locations expected wastewater flows easements expected water demands 168 Spotnap Road • P.O. Box 2738 • Charlottesville, VA 22902 • Tel (434) 977-4511 • Fax (434) 979-0698 www.acsanet.com tip. �i TA,hArCFr a;/ rv' COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 701 VDOT WAY PHILIP A.SHUCET CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22911 JAMES L.BRYAN COMMISSIONER RESIDENT ENGINEER July 8, 2004 Glenn Brooks Department of Engineer and Development 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT's comments from the site review meeting held June 22,2004 at the Charlottesville Residency office. SDP 2004-00052 Dominion Office Park (Yadira Amarante) § Sight Distances needs to be shown; § Entrance needs to be designed in accordance with the Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highway; § Full Frontage improvements need to be continued to the East property boundary to provide 52' curb to curb section; § Guardrail will need to be adjusted with the above improvements and may require additional right of way dedication; § All easements need to be shown; § Drainage computations are required. SDP 2004-00057 Snow's Rental Units(Yadria Amarante) § Sight Distances needs to be shown; § Entrance needs to be designed in accordance with the Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highway. Increase entrance radi to 35'; § Full Frontage improvements need to be continued to the South property boundary. No taper is required at the southern end Taper can marked with pavement markings; § All easements need to be shown; § Drainage computations are required; § Recommend internal driveway be check to determine adequacy for delivery/moving trucks; § Need to add CG-12's to entrance radi. TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY Mr. Glenn Brooks July 8, 2004 Page Two SUB 2004-000178 Mosby Mountain Subdivision (Yadria Amarante) § No additional comments. SDP 2004-00055 Pantops Place(Francis MacCall) § Full Frontage improvements are required; § Entrance needs to be designed in accordance with the Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highway; § All easements need to be shown; § Drainage computations are required. SDP 2004-00058 Salvation Army Thrift Store Addition (Francis MacCall) § Entrance improvements are to be constructed with the VDOT Airport Road project; § No additional improvements are required. SDP 2004-00054 Canaan Christian Church(Stephen Waller) § Minimum Sight Distances is required. A speed study may be needed to determine minimum sight distance requirements; § Entrance needs to be designed in accordance with the Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highway. Minimum 25' entrance radi with a 48' taper; § All easements need to be shown. SUB 2004-00146 Billies/Davis Division (Stephen Waller) § Entrance location has been check in the field and has adequate sight distances; § Plat shows the access easement extending to TMP 135-13A, which makes the access easement for three units, and therefore needs to be reviewed and a private road; § Entrance needs to be designed in accordance with the Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highway. Minimum 25' entrance radi. SUB 2004-00179 Ashcroft West(Stephen Waller) § This is an extension of a private subdivision; § No Comments. SUB 2004-00180 Lake Ridge(Stephen Waller) § Need to show overall network plan; § Road plans are required; § Drainage computation are required; § Roads need to be designed in accordance with the Subdivision Street Standards. Mr. Glenn Brooks July 8, 2004 Page Two Please request the applicants submit a written description of the revisions when resubmitting for review. If you should have concerns with these comments,please discuss with this office prior to sharing with the applicants. Sincerely, C. C. Proctor III Assistant Resident Engineer cc Alan Schuck, Steve Snell,Bill Fritz,David Benish,Yadira Amarante,Francis MacCall, Stephen Waller,Marshall Barron r , SDP#: �� • ��� Date:Snows Fi,c,.ume: 2 ,,71p1❑32.5.6 The preliminary site plan shall contain t following information: ❑a. The name of the development,names oT the owner, s- - • d individual who prepared the plan;tax p and parcel er 4•S desc 'ptions of all :. .. - ••'•. • •i- .-1• ••`^—. .pplicable to the site; magist distract; coungAilid u; no •;u►; sc e; one datum ref-ence for elevation(where section 30.3, flood hazard overlay district, is mvolved, United St tes Geological Survey vertical datum shall •e shown and/ r correlated to plan topography), e source ofthe aphy�the source of su ey;shee er and total numbe f sheets;date dr wing;da and .-,:..-• • •' atest revision;ownft.,oni4,tax nand part umber d pr ent use of adjacent parcels;departmg�okWes; mmimu setback line yard and building,sIparation requirements; a vicinity s tch showing the property and its relationship th adjoining s ee s,su T ivisions and other landmarks;and b 'nda imensions. ❑b. Written schedules or data as necessary to demonstrate that the site can accommodate th roposed use, 'ncludmg: proposed uses and maximum acreage occupied by each use; num er , , maximum square tage for co ercial and industrial uses; maxi m number of employees, maximum o r area ratio and lot coverage if industrial; max um h i t of all structure sc edule o par ng includiII maximum amount required and amount provided;and maximum amountmpervious cover on the site; if a landscape plan is required, maximum amount of paved parking and vehicular circulation areas. rrrr d. If phasing is planned,phase lines and proposed timing of development O d. Existing topography(up to twenty[20]percent slope,maximum five[5] foot contours,over twenty[20]percent slope,maximum ten[10] foot contours). Proposed grading(maximum five [5] foot contours) supplemented where necessary by spot elevations; areas of the site where existing slopes are twenty-five(25)percent or greater Existing topography for the entire site with sufficient offsite topography to describe prominent and pertinent offsite features and physical charactenstics, but in no case less than fifty (50) feet outside of the site unless otherwise approved by the agent. e Existing landscape features as described in section 32.7.9.4.c. lf. The name and location of all watercourses and other bodies of water adjacent to or on the site Indicate if the site is located within a reservoir watershed. �_' g. Location of septic setback lines from watercourses including intermittent streams and other bodies of water. v s h One hundred year flood plain limits as shown on the official flood insurance maps for Albemarle County. . Existing and proposed streets, access easements and travelways, together with street names, state route numbers,right-of-way lines and widths,centerline radii,and pavement widths. j Location and size of: existing water and sanitary sewer facilities and easements; storm sewer facilities, drainage channels; and drainage easements. k 1Proposed conceptual lay-out for water and sanitary sewer facilities and storm drainage facilities including storm detention ponds or structures,mdicating direction of flow in all pipes and watercourses with arrows. 1 1 Location of other existing and proposed utilities and utility easements. p m. Location of existing and proposed ingress to and egress from the property, showing the distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection n Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed improvements including. buildings (maximum footprint and height) and other structures;walkways; fences; walls;trash containers; outdoor lighting, landscaped areas and open space; recreational areas and facilities, parking lots and other paved areas; loading and service areas together with the proposed paving matenal types for all walks,parking lots and driveways;and signs. AK. All areas intended to be dedicated or reserved for public use. C.p. Landscape plan in conformance with section 32.7.9 if required. 1k\ Where deemed appropriate by the agent due to the intensity of development, estimated traffic generation figures for the site based upon ` current Virginia Department of Transportation rates Indicate the estimated vehicles per day and direction of travel for all connections to a public road. r The preliminary site plan shall be dimensioned to at least the following standards for accuracy: 0 1. Boundary,setback and zoning lines-one foot m one thousand(1:1,000)feet; 0 2. Existing contours-one-half('/z)of the contour interval required in section 32.5.6.d above; ❑3. Proposed contours-within five(5)feet honzontally and vertically; 0 4. Existing structures,utilities and other topographic features-within five(5)feet; nf 0 5. Proposed structures,roads,parking lots and other improvements-within five(5)feet. 1v The agent or the commission may require additional information to be shown on the preliminary site plan as deemed necessary in order to provide sufficient information for the agent or the commission to adequately review a the preliminary site plan. 32.6 FINAL SITE PLAN CONTENT ❑ 32.6 1 A final site plan together with amendments thereto shall be prepared and sealed,signed and dated by an architect,professional engineer, land surveyor,or certified landscape architect,each of whom shall be licensed to practice in the Commonwealth of Virginia. ❑ 32 6 2 A final site plan shall be prepared on mylar,sepia or other such transparency material which shall be termed as the master drawing.Two (2)clearly legible blue or black line copies of the master drawing shall be submitted to the department of planning and community development (Added 5-1-87) In addition,if review is required by the commission,one(1)reduced copy no larger than eleven(11)inches by seventeen(17) inches in size shall be submitted ❑ 32.6.3 Two(2)copies of a landscape plan shall be submitted with the final site plan if not previously submitted. ❑ 32 6 4 When the site plan is ready for final approval,the full-sized revised master drawing and a transparency copy of the master drawing shall be submitted for the agent's signature. Once the agent has signed the master drawing,he shall return the master drawing to the developer and the developer shall submit four(4)print copies of the signed master drawing to the agent. ❑ 32.6.5 Unless otherwise approved by the agent,the final site plan shall be prepared to the scale of one(1)inch equals twenty(20)feet or larger or to such a scale as may be approved by the agent in a particular case;no sheet shall exceed thirty-six(so)inches by forty-two(42)inches in size.The site plan may be prepared on one(1)or more sheets. If prepared on more than one(1)sheet,match lines shall clearly indicate where the sheets Join.The top of the sheet shall be approximately either north or east. U 32.6.6 The final site plan shall reflect conditions of approval of the preliminary site plan. The final site plan shall contain the following information in addition to all the information required on the preliminary site plan. U a. Specific written schedules or notes as necessary to demonstrate that the requirements of this chapter are bemg satisfied. In addition to preliminary site plan information,indicate if sale or rental units;number of bedrooms per unit,and number of units per building if multi-family;specifications for recreational facilities. ❑ b.Proposed grading(up to twenty[20]percent slope,maximum two [2] foot contours;over twenty[20]percent slope,maximum five[5] foot contours). ❑ c. Detailed plans for proposed water and sanitary sewer facilities, including: all pipe sizes, types and grades; proposed connections to existing or proposed central systems; location and dimensions of proposed easements and whether the same are to be publicly or pnvately maintained, profiles and cross sections of all water and sewer lines including clearance where lines cross; all water main locations and sizes; valves and fire hydrant locations; all sanitary sewer appurtenances by type and number; the station on the plan to conform to the station shown on the profile and indicate the top and invert elevation of each structure. ❑ d.Detailed construction drainage and grading plans. ❑ I. Profiles of all ditches and channels whether proposed or existing, showing: existing and proposed grades, and invert of ditches, cross pipes or utilities;typical channel cross sections for new construction,and actual cross sections for existing channels intended to remain; U 2.Profiles of all storm sewer systems showing existing and proposed grades, ❑ 3.Plan view of all drainage systems with all structures,pipes and channels numbered or lettered on the plan and profile views. Show sufficient dimensions and bench marks to allow field stake out of all proposed work from the boundary lines, ❑ 4.A drainage summary table for culverts,storm sewer and channels as described in the following example: Structure Descnption Length Invert Number In Slop Remarks e 1 42"RCP 50' 424 5 100. Provide Class III 0 00% 2,EW 2 DI-3B L=8 426.0 - IS-1 0 Top 3 PG-2A 400' 420.0 5 00 D=12" 0 % 4 Grade Swale 200' 420.0 2.50 D=18" 0 % U 5 A legend showing all symbols and abbreviations used on the plan; U 6.General notes,typical sections,and details of all items not covered by Virginia Department of Transportation standard drawings; U 7. Flood plain limits for the one hundred year storm for all watercourses with an upstream drainage area of fifty(50)acres or more provided that the county engineer may waive this requirement for drainage areas of less than one hundred (100) acres upon determination that such mformation is unnecessary for review of the proposed development. U e.Typical street sections together with specific street sections where street cut or fill is five(5)feet or greater;centerline curve data;radius of curb returns or edge of pavement;location,type and size of proposed ingress to and egress from the site,together with culvert size,symmetrical transition of pavement at intersection with existing street, the edge of street surface or face of curb for full length of proposed street, when proposed streets intersect with or adjoin existing streets or travel-ways, both edges of existing pavement or travelway together with curb and gutter indicated for a minimum of one hundred(100)feet or the length of connection,whichever is the greater distance. f.Signature panel for department of planning and community development. U g For all parking and loading areas, indicate: size, angle of stalls;width of aisles and specific number of spaces required and provided, and method of computation.Indicate type of surfacing for all paved or gravel areas. U h.The final site development plan shall be dimensioned to at least the following standards for accuracy: U 1.Boundary,setback and zoning lines-nearest one-one hundredth(0 01)of a foot; U 2.Existing contours-one-half('V2)of the contour mterval required in section 32.6.6.b above; U 3.Proposed contours-within one(1)foot horizontally and vertically; ❑ 4 Spot elevations-within one-tenth(0 10)of a foot; U 5. Existing structures,utilities and other topographic features-within two(2)feet. For critical structures, accuracy should be within one- tenth(0 10)of a foot; U 6 Proposed structures,roads,parking lots and other improvements-within one hundredth(0.01)of a foot. ❑ i.Landscape plan in conformance with section 32 7.9 _ ' . ❑ j. Outdoor lighting information including a photometric plan and location, description, and photograph or diagram of each type of outdoor luminaire Albemarle County Service Authérity .� J(►N 2 2 2004 Serving♦Conserving June 16,2004 David Wyant,P.E. 4686 Garth Road Crozet,Virginia 22932 Re: Snow's Sewer Line Extension Dear Mr.Wyant: The plan, entitled Snow's Sewer Line Extension dated June 3,2002, last revised June 16,2004, is hereby approved for construction. One set of the approved plan is enclosed for your records. Any previously approved plans are voided with this approval. This approval is for basic compliance with the General Water & Sewer Construction Specifications of the Albemarle County Service Authority and does not relieve the contractor from responsibility for his work as it relates to the plan and specifications. The Albemarle County Service Authority requires that a copy of the approved construction plan be on the job site. It is the contractor's responsibility to mark up a copy of the approved construction plan showing as-built information and to provide this data to your client at the completion of utility installation. The final as-built plan shall be submitted in a digital format. A preconstruction conference shall be scheduled with the project manager to ensure coordination and answer any questions. This will be a short meeting to review the project, materials, test methods, and schedule, in order to expedite construction. Please have the proper party call me at 977-4511 to schedule the meeting. This approval is valid for a period of eighteen,(18)months from this date. If construction is not in progress at the end of this period,the approval shall be void. If you have any questions or if we can be of assistance,please advice us. Sincerely, Jeremy M.Lynn Civil Engineer cc: Owner St�.te Health Dept. (Manning Dept. Bldg.Codes&Zoning Services Soil Erosion Inspector Jay Thomas,ACSA Inspector 168 Spotnap Road • P.O. Box 2738 • Charlottesville, VA 22902 • Tel (434) 977-451 1 • Fax (434) 979-0698 www.acsanet.com September 23, 2002 David Wyant 4686 Garth Road Crozet,VA 22932 RE: SDP-2001-074 Snows Rental Units Preliminary Site Plan Dear Mr. Wyant: The above-referenced site plan was approved administratively on this date. The approval of the preliminary site plan is valid for(1) one year in accordance with Zoning Ordinance Section 32.4.3.1. Therefore, the preliminary approval shall expire September 23, 2003. If the preliminary site plan approval expires, a new application must be filed and processed. Please address all of the requirements and conditions listed below and submit eight(8) tentative plan copies to the Department of Planning and Community Development. This letter must be submitted with the tentative plans, as a checklist,to document that you have addressed all requirements or conditions, or the tentative plan will be denied. A submission and review schedule is attached for your information. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and the BMP Stormwater Management Plan, with the associated applications and fees, may also be submitted with the eight(8) tentative Plans. Failure to do so will result in a separate application to be filed with the Engineering Department at a later date. Response: The E & S Plan has been submitted and approved once the last comments are addressed. Preliminary stormwater has been submitted. After the initial tentative plan submittal, each department/agency will contact you to discuss any remaining conditions. After all aforementioned department/agencies have granted a tentative approval, you may submit the final mylars (2 sets), one blueprint copy, final site plan application, final site plan fee, and a copy of all written tentative approvals to the Department of Planning and Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on any Monday. Assuming that the final site plan mylars reflect all tentative approvals, signing of the plans will occur within one week. The final site plan will be subject to all final site plan requirements(Zoning Ordinance Section 32.6), in addition to the following conditions. The Planning Department shall not accept submittal of the final site plan for signature until tentative approvals for the following conditions have been obtained. The final site plan shall not be signed until the following conditions are met: A. Planning Department approval to include: ? [26.7] Performance Standards. Each future occupant of an industrial character shall comply with standards set forth in section 4.14 and submit to the county engineer as a part of final site development plan approval, a certified engineer's report describing the proposed operation, all machines,processes,products and by-products, stating the nature and expected levels or emission or discharge to land, air and/or water or liquid, solid or gaseous effluent and electrical impulses and noise under normal operations, and the specifications of treatment methods and mechanisms to be used to control such emission or discharge. The county engineer shall review the applicant's submittal and make comment and recommendation prior to final commission action on the site development plan. Response: When future occupants are identified, the owner will submit the requested information to the county engineer. ? [32.7.2.5] The commission or the agent may require provision for and/or construction of travel lanes or driveways to serve adjoining properties. The pavement of vehicular travel lanes or driveways designed to permit vehicular travel on the site and from adjacent property and parking areas shall be not less than twenty(20) feet in width. Please submit a plat for an easement from parcel 35Y to parcel 35. Response: A 24-foot road surface is planned as shown on the plan. If the proposed location of the existing entrance is satisfactory to the county and VDOT, then the owner will have the easement platted. Please let the owner know. — ? [32.7.9.7(b)] Interior landscaping: Exclusive of the requirements of section 32.7.9.7 (a) and(c), an area equal to five(5)percent of the paved parking and vehicular circulation area shall be landscaped with trees or shrubs. This shall include one(1) large or medium shade tree per ten(10)parking spaces or portion thereof, if five(5) spaces or more. Interior landscaping shall be located in reasonably dispersed planting islands or perimeter areas. Shrub plantings adjacent to a building shall not be counted as interior landscaping...Please show how you are meeting these requirements. Response: The canopy calculations and large or medium shade trees requirements are shown on sheet 1 and the amount provided exceeds the requirements. Interior beds are shown on the plan as requested by ARB. /? [32.7.9.9(b)] The following minimum requirements shall apply: (1) Ten(10)percent tree canopy for a site to be developed with commercial, office or industrial uses...Please include tree canopy calculations on the plan Response: See sheet 1. Please remove the proposed row of trees within the right-of-way. After further consultation with ARB staff the additional plantings were found to be unnecessary. I Response: A note is on sheet 2 indicating the trees are to be removed. B. Albemarle County Architectural Review Board approval to include: jRemove note#3 ("fence will be chain link with brown diagonal slats") from the site plan sheet. esponse: The note has been removed. Detail of fence on sheet 1. . Remove all references to the freestanding signs from the plans. Submit a separate application at a later date. No signs will be included in approvals for this site plan. Response: Two sign locations are shown but only for coordination with plantings. The owner is aware that a separate application is required for sign approval and will be reviewed by ARB. ?Revise the proposed topography in the parking area of the southern storage yard(front row). If a retaining wall will be required, show it and provide details on height,materials, appearance, etc. Response: No retaining wall is proposed because the owner intends to keep the fence on top of the fill as shown on the plan. Landscaping is proposed outside of the fence and at the top of the fill. Regarding the landscaping: ? Create a more informal, evergreen planting in the southwest corner of the site. This planting should tie in with the proposed 4-season buffer and the Leyland Cypress. Plants should be placed in a mixed mass planting rather than planted in rows (single or staggered) of single species. Response: The plantings are shown as suggested by staff and ARB after numerous meetings and I believe achieves this objective. ? The planting at the front of the site should provide continuous screening. Add plants accordingly. Response: The plantings do provide continuous screening and met ARB and staff approval after the many meetings with them. Elevations of the view were provided and in the files. ? Show on the plan the Dwarf Buford Holly that is included in the landscape key. Response: The Dwarf Buford Holly are shown on the plan (sheet 2) in front of the back buildings as suggested by staff. ? Revise the spacing of the white pines in the vicinity of the rip rap trench on the south side of the site to 15' on center. Response: The white pines are spaced 15 feet on center. A note is shown on the right side of the property line. ?Revise the spacing of the schip laurel to 5'on center. Response: The schip laurel is shown as 5' on center as requested by staff. ?The fence shall be stained to match the building. Response: The note on the plan has been changed. ? There shall be no points on the fence rail. Response: The points were removed on the fence. C. Engineering Department approval to include: ? The conceptual BMP calculations indicate a require removal rate of 78%. A biofilter and two water quality swales are proposed as BMP's. We feel the water quality swales must be biofilters instead to enhance filtration of runoff. This must be addressed with the final site plan. [17-315] Response: Water quality swales will be changed to biofilters. In my first design I will try to make the one large basin as the only biofilter, if possible, and eliminate the 2 smaller biofilters. 1 , ? The proposed storm sewer system appears to be adequate for the site. Please note that the minimum pipe size is 15 inches. This can be addressed with the final design. [18- 32.7.4] Response: Thanks. Will account for in final design. ? The proposed grades in southern parking lot near the western building appear to exceed 5%. The grading must be revised with the final site plan. [18-4.12.6.3b] Response: I will check grade and adjust fence location in final. The following items must be submitted with the final site plan for review by the Engineering Department. ?An erosion control plan,narrative and computations. [18-32.7.4.3, 17-203] Response: E & S Plan has been approved. ?A completed application and fee for erosion control and stormwater management. [17- 203, 17-303] Response: Fee has been paid. ?A stormwater management/BMP plan and computations. Computations must include water quality, and detention routings for the 2yr and l0yr storms. [17-304] Response: I will submit the plan shortly. ?A completed stormwater management facilities maintenance agreement and fee. [17- 323] Response: Maintenance agreement and fee will be submitted shortly. ?Drainage computations. [18-32.7.4, Policy] Response: Calculations for drainage pipes will be submitted shortly. ?VDOT approval will also be required for final site plans that affect right-of-way. Response: VDOT has reviewed the preliminary and is in agreement as to the proposed improvements. D. Albemarle County Building Codes and Zoning Services approval to include: ? [32.5.6(a)] Once the Special Use Permit is approved the SP number and all conditions of the SP must be noted on the plan. Final approval of the site plan is subject to compliance with all conditions of the SP. Response: Notes will be inserted on the plan once the SP is approved. E. Albemarle County Service Authority approval to include: ?Approval of final water and sewer construction drawings. These drawings shall be submitted directly to the Service Authority. Response: ACSA has approved the sewer and water plans. A final sewer submittal addressing 3 editorial comments will he submitted shortly and ACSA will sign off. If you have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Yadira Amarante, Planner AFFIDAVIT June 25, 2004 I, Janice C. Farrar, hereby certify that the attached notification letter was sent on the above date to those persons listed on said notification. A total of 16 letters were sent (this includes those listed receiving a copy). Given under my hand in the County of Albemarle, State of Virginia this 25th day of June 2004. . Janice Farrar Notary Public My commission expires January 31, 2008 File: SDP 2004-00057 Snow's Rental Units ("opy A L,84. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development Planning 401 McIntire Road,Room 218 Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596 (434)296-5823 Fax(434)972-4012 June 25, 2004 RE: SDP 2004-00057 Snow's Rental Units -Tax Map 90, Parcels 35 and 35Y Dear Sir or Madam: This letter is to notify you that the following development proposal has been submitted to the County for review: • SDP 2004-00057 Snow's Rental Units: Request for Final (prior to preliminary)site plan approval to construct 16-45' x 35' office buildings (totaling 25,200 s.f.) to rent as contractor offices and storage yards. Property is 8.167 acres zoned LI (Light Industrial). It is described as Tax Map 90, Parcels 35 and 35Y. It is located on State Route 742 (Avon Street Extended) across the entrance to Mill Creek South. This site is located in the Scottsville Magisterial District and is recommended for Industrial uses in Neighborhood 4 in the Comprehensive Plan. This development proposal is scheduled for the Site Review Committee meeting on the date listed below. The applicant's attendance is not mandatory, although it may be requested by the County. Regardless of whether the applicant will be attending, the County staff will be available for consultation on the Site Review Committee meeting date at 10:00 a.m., in Room 235 of the County Office Building on McIntire Road in Charlottesville.This meeting will be an informal session with the Site Review Committee to discuss issues and share information. The development proposal will be reviewed and approved, subject to compliance with applicable ordinances, by the Site Review Committee, unless a written request is made for Planning Commission review by a member of the Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors,or an abutting property owner by the Request for Review deadline. If requested for review, the development proposal will be reviewed by the Planning Commission. All applicable dates scheduled for this development proposal are listed below. Site Review comments available (Tues) July 6, 2004 Site Review Committee meeting date (Thurs, 10 a.m.) July 8, 2004 Revision & Request for Review deadline (Mon) July 19, 2004 Planning Commission meeting (Tues) August 10, 2004 Plans for the proposed development are available for your review in the Department of Planning and Community Development. Interested members of the public are encouraged to contact this department at any time during working hours (8 a.m.-5 p.m., Mon-Fri), and make an appointment to Page 2 June 25, 2004 discuss the proposed development. Should you wish to attend the Site Review Committee meeting, please notify the Department of Planning and Community Development so that any concerns may be adequately addressed. Sincerely, Yadira Amarante Senior Planner YQA/ebg C: BATTEN, DONALD S BRANCH, KELLY W JR CHRISTOPHER, GINA S ELLIS, ANNA MARIE FAITH TEMPLE; LOUISE C WRIGHT, ROBERT S WRIGHT, HOWARD G CAREY ETAL TR GATSKI, MEGAN LYNN GENTRY, RIVES C LEE, ROBERT E MUSSMAN, GRANT M OR ELIZABETH A SHARON, SUSAN C SNOWS GARDEN CENTER& NURSERY INC CIO ROBERT&VONDA SNOW SNOWS INC C/O DUANE SNOW WILSON TERMINAL CORP YAO, J I E cc: David Wyant Duane E. or Rowena M. Snow File: