Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB200200137 Staff Report 2002-12-16 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Project#: Name ARB-2002-135 and 136: River's Edge Furmture Store and River's Edge Automobile Dealership Review Type Preliminary review of a site plan; advisory review for a special use permit for motor vehicle sales in the urban area; advisory review for a special use permit for outdoor sales/storage/display of vehicles in the Entrance Corridor Location On the west side of Route 20 North, approximately .1 mile north of the intersection with Route 250 East, in front of the River's Edge commercial building Parcel Identification Tax Map 78,Parcel 58G Zoned Commercial (C1) and Entrance Corridor(EC) Magisterial District Rivanna Proposal Construct a furniture store building and an automobile dealership building with outdoor sales/storage/display of vehicles ARB Meeting Date December 16, 2002 Staff Contact Margaret Maliszewski PROJECT HISTORY On March 12, 2002 a Certificate of Appropriateness was issued for the Rivers Edge Commercial Building. It is a brick faced building with a shingled, hipped roof. Currently, the dealership and furniture store sites occupy a single parcel to the east of the commercial building,but the applicant has submitted a plat to further subdivide the property. There are currently approximately ten automobile dealerships operating in a concentrated area on Route 250 East, with additional vehicle-related services (Authorized Auto Service, Tuffy Muffler) in the same general area. Some of these businesses were established prior to the establishment of EC regulations. Others have been reviewed by the ARB, and in most cases, the ARB forwarded to the Planning Commission a recommendation of "no objection" to the request for the Special Use Permit, with conditions. Conditions have typically included the addition of landscaping and have sometimes required the relocation of the building closer to the road, and shifting some parking to the rear of the building. For those proposals on Route 250 East, the ARB has taken into consideration the existence of other dealerships and display vehicles in the immediate vicinity. One dealership (Pegasus), which existed prior to the establishment of EC regulations,has frontage on Route 20. ARB 12/16/2002 River's Edge Auto and Furniture Store—Preliminary Site Plan and Advisory Review-Page 1 PROJECT DETAILS An auto dealership is proposed at the south end of the site and.a furniture store is proposed at the north end.An entrance/travelway,transmission tower, and overhead lines separate the sites.The tower and lines are dominant visual elements in the area.Numerous other utilities also cross the site. The proposed furniture store measures 70' x 140''and is situated parallel to the curving EC. One row of parking is proposed in front of the store. The building features a central gabled brick bay, a colonnade walkway with a green metal hipped roof and pediments,and walls faced with stucco. The auto dealership building, shown on the plans as a Kia store, is irregularly shaped. It is oriented parallel to the EC and the existing commercial building, but its front elevation faces north. The front elevation incorporates angled walls and a large expanse 'of windows to accommodate the showroom. Showroom windows extend to the floor. The south elevation has a series of 5 overhead doors at the ground story and paired windows at the second story, and has a more utilitarian appearance than the front. Overall, the building incorporates a wide vanety of windows. The building features brick detailing and small sections of green metal roof over gabled bays that project from the main flat-roofed section of the structure. Two rows of parking are situated between the building and the EC. 26 display spaces and 6 customer spaces (32 total) are proposed in the front parking lot. An additional 12 display spaces and 9 employee spaces(21 total)are located west of the showroom. ANALYSIS Context: The proposed site is situated to the north of the McDonald's and Pantops Texaco sites and to the east of the Rivanna River, Free Bndge Lane, and the River's Edge Commercial Building. Across Route 20 to the east is the Rexel Electric building. The nearby area of Route 250 East,(approximately 700' to the south) is a heavily developed commercial area that includes a number of automobile dealerships with vehicles on display. One of these is situated at the northeast corner of the intersection of Routes 20 and 250. The area that is visible to the north on Route 20 is significantly less developed and more heavily wooded. It includes Darden Towe Park and,residential properties. Site Development,.Layout, and Grading: The site is currently occupied by the River's Edge Commercial Building, which is located adjacent to Free Bndge Lane. An entrance to the site has already been created from Route 20. The entrance and travelways divide the site, with the dealership on the south side and the furniture store on the north side. A high voltage electric line crosses the site and the easement occupies a large portion of the property. Fiber optic, water, sanitary and other electric easements also cross the property. Floodplam at the south further limits developable area. A biofilter is proposed south of the dealership building. The south side of the dealership building is two stories in height; the front is one story in height. The lower story accommodates the service area. The upper floor is for the showroom. The furniture store appears one story in height on the EC side. 54 parking spaces are proposed for the dealership. 40 of these are display spaces. 32 spaces are situated at the front of the site, which does not present the most appropriate appearance for the EC. Moving the building closer to the road, and moving all or some of the parking away from the EC, would result in a more appropriate appearance with less focus on parking,but the building cannot be shifted closer due to the location of existing easements. Although the east side of the building may be appropriately designed,the overall building, in its proposed location, does not have a strong relationship with the EC road. It is anticipated that the display, as shown, will have a negative ARB 12/16/2002 River's Edge Auto and Furniture Store—Preliminary Site Plan and Advisory Review-Page 2 impact on the EC. 16 parking spaces in a single row are proposed in front of the furniture store building. 52 spaces are proposed behind. Visibility: Both buildings will be readily visible from the Route 20 EC. Most of the parking will be visible from the EC. Distant views of some of the site will be available from Route 250 Structure(s) Compatibility with historic sites/structures: • Despite its irregular shape and extensive use of glass, the dealership building could be compatible with the County's historic architecture in terms of materials and scale. Complete to-scale elevations are required to make a final determination. • The furniture store has the appearance of a typical, current-day shopping center and has no real relationship to the traditional architecture of the County. The design should be revised to create a more appropriate appearance. • A parking lot of display vehicles also has no relationship to the historic architecture of the area. The character of display parking differs from by-right commercial parking. Display parking typically is not confined to striped spaces; rather, cars are more densely parked within a given area. Display cars also typically receive signage in the form of price and similar stickers, balloons and flags to attract attention, etc. Also, though individual vehicles may come and go or may be moved around the lot, display cars are in the lot around the clock, every day. These characteristics contribute significantly to the inappropriate appearance of the proposed display within the Entrance Corridor. Scale: The dealership building measures 64' long x 53' wide. The furniture store measures 70' wide x 140' long. It is anticipated that both buildings will be able to incorporate a human scale by using appropriate architectural devices and by incorporating landscaping. Materials: The color rendering of the dealership building shows red brick,as the prominent material. The photos of the model suggest that the rear elevation will also be faced with brick. The main material of the furniture store appears to be stucco. The emphasis on stucco in this design does not, result m an appropriate appearance for the EC, or a compatible appearance with the other buildings on site. Forms and Features. The prominent feature of the dealership building will be the angled showroom window walls and the two-story south elevation. In the furniture store design, the stucco walls, metal roof, and brick bay compete for attention. If signage is planned for the upper stucco band, it too will compete for attention, adding to the uncoordinated appearance of the whole. The broad, blank side walls of the furniture store will also be prominent features.The parking at the dealership site will be prominent. The high voltage electric line will maintain a significant presence Blankness: Blankness is not a feature of the elevations that have been provided for review, but the side elevations of the furniture store are proposed to be blank. The incorporation of fenestration into the side walls would be appropriate, or other significant architectural detailing will have to be incorporated into the design to make the appearance of these walls appropriate The position of the furniture store offers an opportunity to significantly landscape the north side of the building. A planting bed should be provided on the south side of the building, as well. Connecting Devices.No connecting devices are proposed for either building. ARB 12/16/2002 River's Edge Auto and Furniture Store—Preliminary Site Plan and Advisory Review-Page 3 Accessory Structures and Equipment: A dumpster is proposed at the southeast corner of the dealership building. Another is shown on the west side of the parking lot behind,the furniture store. As proposed at the lower level, topography and landscaping should provide sufficient screening for the dealership dumpster. The furniture store dumpster may be visible across the parking lot. Appropriate screening should be included in the plan. Lighting: 19 pole lights are shown in the dealership parking lot. This appears to be an excessive number for this area. A photometric plan is required to make a final determination. No lights are shown in the furniture store lot; it is anticipated that they will be proposed later. Complete lighting details should be provided for both sites, including photometrics. Lighting should be coordinated throughout the Rivers Edge site. Signs: Complete sign information has not been provided, but two Kia signs are shown on the dealership building. They are oval signs and are illustrated as panels with black letters on a white background. They are located within the pediments of the projecting gabled bays on the north and east elevations. No signs have been shown on the furniture store building, but sign bands have been incorporated into the building design. Complete sign information should be provided for both sites to ensure overall compatibility. Landscaping: Landscaping is shown on the preliminary plan, but complete details have not been provided. For example, a landscape schedule has not been provided, so a complete review cannot be accomplished. All landscaping shown on the color elevations does not appear on the plan. Trees and shrubs are shown along the EC, and a limited number of interior parking lot trees are shown(but only one is proposed for the dealership lot). Landscaping should be added to the plan to meet the requirements of the ARB Guidelines, and additional plants should be proposed to reduce the impacts of the proposed parking. The profusion of utilities and easements could limit landscaping opportunities. If plants are planted in easements and future utility work disturbs the plants, some provision should be made to ensure that replacement plants shall be of like size as the plantings being replaced, at the time they were removed. SUMMARY The goal of EC regulation is to promote orderly and attractive development and to ensure that the design of new development reflects the traditional architecture of the area. A parking lot filled with vehicles on display is not reflective of the traditional architecture of the area. While the ARB has in the past recommended "no objection" to several requests for the display use along the Route 250 East Corridor, those recommendations were founded in part on the fact that similar uses were adjacent or located in the immediate vicinity. The Route 20 Entrance Corridor is not characterized by the level of commercial activity or the number of automobile dealerships as is Route 250 East. Negative factors of the proposal are the number of display spaces, the location of display spaces between the building and the EC, the fact that the building can't be moved closer to the EC because of existing utilities,the number of pole lights proposed, and the fact that the proposed use is out of character with the Route 20 Entrance Corridor (which differs from that of Route 250 East). If the building could be moved closer to the road and the'parking moved behind the buildmg,the development might be made appropriate for the EC,but these options are not available at this site. In the applicant's favor are the facts that the appearance of the site is already compromised by the high ' voltage electric lines, that similar development is located in the general vicinity on Route 250 East, and ARB 12/16/2002 River's Edge Auto and Furniture Store—Preliminary Site Plan and Advisory Review-Page 4 that current zoning would not allow this use (either by right or by special permit) in many more locations on Route 20. It should also be,noted that a by-right commercial use could occupy this site with a similar parking layout (but the differences between display parking and standard parking, as described under compatibility with historic sites/structures should be considered). Ultimately, the focus on display parking is not appropriate for the Route 20 EC and staff cannot find a compelling reason to support a proposal to establish a vehicle display use in the Route 20 Entrance Corridor when the negative impacts of the use cannot be appropriately mitigated. RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding the request for the Special Use Permit Staff recommends that the ARB forward the following recommendation to the Planning Commission: The ARB cannot support the request for the special use permit for the following reasons: 1. Because the focus of the proposal is on vehicles for display. 2. Because the resulting development does not reflect the traditional architecture of the area. 3. Because it is anticipated that the appearance of the display will have a negative impact on the Route 20 Entrance Corridor. 4. Because utilities and easements make appropriate location of buildings and parking impossible at this site. Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend support for the proposal, the ARB recommends the following conditions of approval: 1. Reduce the impact of the proposed parking on the EC by significantly increasing the landscaping along the EC,within the parking lot, and on the south side of the site. 2. Lighting shall be reduced to eliminate negative impacts on the EC. 3. All sides of the building that are visible from the EC shall be faced with brick. 4. Vehicles shall not be elevated anywhere on site. 5. The number of display spaces at the front of the site shall be reduced to minimize impacts on the EC. 6. Display spaces shall measure 9' x 18' and shall be striped. Display cars shall be parked in striped display spaces only. 7. Parked cars shall not display signage, flags, balloons, or other similar items, beyond that required by the manufacturer. In the event that the ARB disagrees with the above recommendation, Staff suggests that the ARB withhold its recommendation on the SP until a revised plan is submitted. The revised plan should address the following: 1. The display parking at the front of the site shall be significantly reduced to minimize impacts on the EC. (With this recommendation staff suggests that the ARB identify the specific spaces to be removed from the plan.) 2. Significant landscaping shall be added to the plan to minimize negative impacts on the EC. (With this recommendation staff suggests that the ARB clearly specify the character of the required landscaping.) 3. The applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed plantings can be planted in the various easements and that provisions have been made for appropriate replacements following utility work. When a revised plan addressing these issues is submitted, a recommendation can be made on the SP. (The SP is currently scheduled for review by the Planning Commission in early March. The applicant could ARB 12/16/2002 River's Edge Auto and Furniture Store—Preliminary Site Plan and Advisory Review-Page 5 make a revised ARB submittal on January 6 for a review on February 18 and maintain the current PC schedule.) Regarding the conceptual site plan for the auto dealership Staff offers the following preliminary comments: 1. Provide to-scale elevations for all sides of the building that are visible from the EC. Show that these elevations will be faced with brick. 2. Provide for better coordination of windows throughout the building. 3. Provide complete lighting information. Reduce the number of pole lights in the dealership lot. Pole height shall be compatible with building height. Lighting shall be coordinated throughout the River's Edge site. 4. Provide all material and color samples. Materials shall be coordinated throughout the River's Edge site. 5. Show all mechanical equipment on the plan and provide details on how visibility of these features will be eliminated. 6. Provide complete sign information. Sign design and location shall be compatible with the architecture of the building. 7. Show all existing and proposed utilities. 8. Landscaping: • Show existing and proposed tree lines. If frees are proposed to remain, incorporate a signed tree conservation checklist into the plan. Show on the plan the mformation that is required by the checklist to demonstrate the measures that will be implemented dunng construction to protect any existing trees that are proposed for preservation. • Provide a landscape schedule to include botanical and common names, quantity and sizes of proposed plants.Additional comments will be provided when the schedule is submitted. • Continue the row of trees along both sides of all travelways as per ARB Design Guidelines. • Provide interior parking lot trees at a minimum of 1 for every 10 parking spaces, evenly distributed. Note that interior parking lot trees are counted separately from perimeter parking lot, EC, and building landscaping. • Reverse the north parking lot planting plan to show shrubs along the parking spaces (rather than along the sidewalk) and shade trees along the main travelway to coordinate with the furniture store site. • Provide shrubs in the parking islands north of the building entrance. • Provide conifers to the south and southeast of the building to help minimize the impact of the development. • Incorporate screening trees at the base of the steel frame transmission tower to better integrate the site. • Provide landscaping to screen the transformer. • Add landscaping around the building to further integrate the site. Regarding the preliminary site plan for the furniture store Staff offers the following recommendations on the preliminary site plan 1. Revise the design of the furniture store to rely less on EIFS, to have a more coordinated overall appearance, and to relate better to the other River's Edge buildings. 2. Provide side elevations for the furniture store.Blankness is riot appropriate for the EC. 3. Revise the furniture store elevations to show how the change in grade across the front of the site will affect the appearance of the building. ARB 12/16/2002 River's Edge Auto and Furniture Store—Preliminary Site Plan and Advisory Review-Page 6 4. Clarify the area between the sidewalk and the parking lot in ,front of the furniture store (i.e., groundcover or grass). 5. Indicate locations of loading areas for the furniture store. If these areas are visible from ;the EC, provide details on appearance. 6. Provide complete lighting information.Pole height shall be compatible with building height. Lighting shall be coordinated throughout the River's Edge site. 7. Provide all material and color samples. Materials shall be coordinated throughout the River's Edge site. 8. Show all mechanical equipment on the plan and provide details on how visibility of these features will be eliminated. 9. Provide complete sign information. Sign design and location shall be compatible with the architecture of the building. 10. Provide information on the design of the proposed dumpster screen. 11. Show all existing and proposed utilities. 12. Show how off-site improvements are being handled. 13. Landscaping: • Show existing and proposed tree lines. If trees are proposed to remain, incorporate a signed tree conservation checklist into the plan. Show on the plan the information that is required by the checklist to demonstrate the measures that will be implemented during construction to protect any existing trees that are proposed for preservation. • Add conifers on the north side of the furniture store to help minimize the impact of the side elevation. • Continue the EC shade and ornamental trees the full length of the EC frontage as per ARB Design Guidelines. • Provide a landscape schedule to include botanical and common names, quantity and sizes of proposed plants.Additional comments will be provided when the schedule is submitted. • Continue the row of trees along both sides of the main travelway. • Provide interior parking lot trees at a minimum of 1 for every 10 parking spaces, evenly distributed. Note that interior parking lot trees are counted separately from perimeter, EC, and building landscaping. ARB 12/16/2002 River's Edge Auto and Furniture Store—Preliminary Site Plan and Advisory Review-Page 7