HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA201900004 Presentation 2020-11-24ZMA2019-004 Breezy Hill
PLANNING COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 24, 2020
Rivanna
Glenmore
"p• 0'�
0
Edge of Village of
Rivanna Master Plan
Site
Running Deer
Neighborhood
Meeting and Action History
Community Meeting:
June 24, 2019
Planning Commission
Work Session: July
30, 2019
Planning Commission
Public Hearing: July
7, 2020
Board of Supervisors
Public Hearing:
September 2, 2020
Board of Supervisors
vote to send
application back to
PC: October 21, 2020
Board accepted deferral request
from applicant at the meeting
Planning Commission recommended
denial by a vote of 6:0 (Firehock
absent)
-----
A
1-1----
BLOCK 3
BLOCK 4
----- ------- �li
SLOCK8 -"44.0
S EP ApCS
El
--------------- - --
--------- -
- ---- ---------- - - --
----- ----- -
Nkt
a
BF.R
�e
s�
' vca umi.
i
rzn a �9[C ON sm m Hours rso.
. w2fa+efi M[ Stt .k wwt[rrEM NUW4F IWMw15 I R' i#
BLOCK 6-
T....
PARK
PPAN
yn.
L END
■ �00' SiRGM BllffEP
■ sEm sswFs (PFESEmEo)
■ srgMlWWtEP MVMGEMEM FlGllltt
PEEV
ON.—�. /N
r .P.�M.W..frI.-F. R—1
. o..PE.�ol
Favorable Factors:
The proposed development includes an entrance as recommended on
the "Future Land Use Plan" (Detail Map 2).
The proposal includes a multi -use path along US 250, as per the "Future
Transportation Network."
The proposal includes a (future) vehicular and/or pedestrian interparcel
connection to the west across Carrol Creek, as recommended on the
"Future Land Use Plan (Detail Map 2)."
The proposal's Affordable Housing proffer would generate $42Z500
(max) of monetary contributions to support off -site affordable housing
initiatives; or ensure construction of 20 affordable dwelling units (max)
for sale or for rent; or an adjusted combination of those outcomes.
The proposal meets the applicable Neighborhood Model Principles.
Unfavorable
Factors:
Summary of Community Concerns
Consistency with the recommendations in the Master Plan
Transportation recommendations
Density recommendations and overall density of the proposal
Transition of development from Rivanna Village as the center
Increase in traffic from the development, specifically concerns on adding vehicles on Route 250
going into Charlottesville.
Impact and safety concerns to Running Deer residents with the connection to Running Deer
Drive
Safety concerns for access from 250 for emergency vehicles
Impact to school capacity
Environmental impacts
Questions?
Motions: Rezoning Application
A. If the Planning Commission wishes to recommend denial of this zoning map
amendment as recommended by staff:
Move to recommend denial of ZMA 2019-004 Breezy Hill for the reasons
stated in the staff report.
B. If the Planning Commission wishes to recommend approval of this zoning map
amendment:
Move to recommend approval of ZMA2019-004 Breezy (state reasons).
Overall:
1. Density was reduced from 160 units to 130 units. This equates to 1.6 units/acre gross density and 1.9
units/acre net density.
Proffers:
1. Proffer 1b was updated to include language that would allow a full vehicular connection at Running Deer
Drive, if required by VDOT.
2.
Proffer
1c was
offered
to prohibit construction
traffic from
using the
Running Deer Drive entrance.
3.
Proffer
1i was
revised
to include the maximum
number of
units with
a reduction from 160 units to 130 units.
4. Proffer 1j was offered to limit the net density for Block 5 to 1 unit per acre.
5. Proffer 1k was offered to restrict Block 6 to one dwelling via a deed restriction in favor of the future Breezy
Hill homeowner's association.
6. Additional technical changes were made at the recommendation of the County Attorney's Office.
7. The total cash contribution for affordable housing was revised in Proffer 4a to account for the reduction in
units, from a total of $507,000 for 24 affordable units (160x15%) to $422,500 for 20 affordable units
(130x15%).
Concept Plan:
1. Street sections were updated to include sidewalk, planting strip, and curb and gutter.
2. Mid -block, multi -use 10' asphalt trails were added.
3. Notation added that the connection at Running Deer Drive would be either emergency access only or a full
vehicular connection, if required by VDOT.
4. Mid -block trail standard was revised to be 10' asphalt multi -use trail.
5. A cross section of the stormwater management pond along Route to 250 was provided on sheet 4 that shows
how the enhanced extended detention pond works with the 10' multi -use path, landscaping, and preserved
steep slopes.
6. Notation added that the lots would not encroach into the stream buffer or preserved slopes on the cover
sheet.
7. Notation added that street trees would be provided.
8. Notation added that two layers of erosion and sediment control measures would be provided where
development abuts stream buffers.
9. Notation added that no erosion and sediment control measure would be located within the stream buffer.
10. Notation
added
that grading activities would not be allowed
within the stream buffer.
11. Notation
added
that all construction traffic would enter/exit
the site through the main entrance on Route
250 and would not be permitted to use the entrance at Running Deer Drive.
12. Design and alignment of Road B has been reconfigured.
80-55B v 80-53
80
80-55 80-55C
80-49A
80-49
94-4
94.3 A
80-56B
94-5
94-6
94-7B
i 94-10
Hill ZMA - Zonin with Critical Resources
80-45A 80`60A
80-57
94-8A
1
94.7
M�
94-BF
94-7A S Ln 94-Bt
94-9 94-BD
94-51
94-11 A
`ryo
pti 94-57
94-58 99�70 94-103
60. 94-59 / 11-194-10
80-59
80-63B
Bree?y /
Cn
94-48
94-8 94.47
P1
94-47A am 94-47B
m c. 94-,0
wa' 4f
Pt �\C9 94-46A
94-BCPvoc
/ \ 94.46A1 94-
94-12C1
Legend
- 80-62J
Iwr..so-.e m..:e,�umnrnm,o>o. �:w•-r
C�
Ovadaya
■ WaMr Prq yqn OMnana: BUM:rs
80-62
parts mlp
_ PmoNa
7p ' ft
■ FPpe Hpxard Wmby I109Ypm Fln
Sleep YOPes xNmley
• Gowl Saes
Sln:ry Slola:s. MnnagrM
�
Sleep Slopes-Pesenee
ZpnRu-I ilcalms
67
Rural Jv.a
9�
Y�ReeMenlm
RI Reebemal
• R R:rodnnxRl
R.RG
Resdw.1
R10 RusvNmlial
m
PIm unit o9ueopmenl
N
A Plampd R.sdR �rlgm'rrnl
W
n
■ N.0lw'.w dw Olsten
p
■ MpnuceW Hsmrc O:ebip
m
C1 Cmmnrcial
■ epmmerew anMe
■ HpRxay Cpmmeroal
■ PlmmFd Cp alpmn: pmq G1r
i5
pevalopnenl I W.. .m
■mamas Cpm.
■ Opxnlawn Croxat pNnd
lgncmamry
■ Heary IrMnYy
Par,
IN r. o°
94.45
RWM.kBnllMuemel
94-12C
ne:
.aprcna:a2.nae
aa.p.:..
iu11a M xvesezz
0 —
rrvman.natr wlmopcx.,me:n. mmalaplYHrdpFla[.�i:v.xnenm Pap..rr ti.+m ewna.ne. i.mr.eneix momr.irn onrr.m ma no:: �rsM a Ix Y.ml madlc.lm a renm�ry or rpo.emela w rn.:prxrry or rv.nowd.-an..won Mm •e. zpls
My 9BNmIIgSw' d Imm, r}pry w paWR. ar q+Y gyclun BI GBYYfBiirpaw,g�IB pwWIY InBBp Iw[YnYS B brypnBry M1w��WMbB/ eMBMI rV 4 u W btl'g4Y9q ww4BNIIXr b WnfiuCly�tlry' p'BmBNB IO Ri p WBry b kr BCaJpiin EgBrnryq' µar t5 T119
The Future Land Use Map in detail shows the areas in the Village where further
development could be expected. The insert below again shows these three
areas: A, B. and C.
ktown Area A is expected to have the greatest density.
R d with the higher density development being located
:GW
so near the Village Center and lower density
radiating away from the Center. Housing types
expected would be single-family detached
dwellings on medium or small lots, duplexes,
townhouses. and low-rise garden apartments.
��,�9Senior living could be provided in this area. Area
afrou oar Dr B will have the lowest density of this Development
'ak Area. Single-family detached homes on medium
or small lots are expected. Area C could have a density that resembles the
density found in the Glenmore development or it could have a density which
more closely resembles the density in the Village Center.
A possible mixture of density for these three areas is provided below:
Acres
Density
Dwellings
Additional
Population
Area A
94
3 dwellings
237
500
per acre
Area B
115
1 dwelling per
115
244
acre
Area C
24
2 dwellings
48
102
per acre
Totals
233
400
846
A
Bn5n41 EE-SEA r
BB `
BEM,
94-55
Breezy Hill
a�
m
e
a.a.
94- e,/
i 90 ��
A-05Al
B..,]C
o
�a 2 i
r
w
Potential for Higher Density Development
/� '• Leave Open For Potential \
C�C Road or Trail
>f Leave Open For Potential
Road(with gate)or Trail
'iai8down Ln
(/N
O
OC C
C0®A Z eJC
0 0.2 0. 0.4 0.5
Miles
i
� �-- PogseE Access Po,m FlaoElMalns
IMershte ®$beam altar
K pus or SYY Role Wblk or MNNbnel
M.r Pubic nM M P.. Rosh Sem-Fade C,,In Span
_ V'Ylw FesNe IIIIII, Nblk Opn Sryw
iC C3JJt 1I of RNa— Nwlogrienl Area Nelph..d RestleMLl 0.miy tYx.e 2 D.U/fie)
s Y p1JJJ/. emalsbpe OrverehboTxd RosdarMal amity(. 2 nU/Ao)
- Ro,.w w
!ntial
Trail
Route 250 without median
Walking/ Travel lanes Shoulder and
biking path ditch
Village of Rivanna Master Plan- Page 43
"approval of any development by rezoning will be predicated on the completion of a number of transportation improvements..."
"It is essential that all of the US 250 improvements be constructed before new development occurs in the Village."
Interchange Improvements at 1-64 and US 250 East
Six -lane US 250 from Free Bridge east to 1-64 Interchange
Four -lane US 250 from US250/1-64 interchange to Rt 729
(Milton Rd) and, possibly, Glenmore Way
Intersection improvements at US250 and Rt 729 (Milton
Rd)
Bridge improvement or replacement over railroad at Route
22 (Louisa Rd)
Addition of eastbound left turn and westbound right turn
lanes on US 250 at Rt 616 (Black Cat Road)
Status
Funded and will be complete
Not Complete; SMART -scale application to be submitted
Not Complete
Not Complete; Partially Proffered
Partially Complete
Not Complete
2023 No Build
2023 Build
2023 Build w/ signal
improvements
Movement
LOS
Seconds
Queue
LOS
Seconds
Queue
LOS
Seconds
Queue
Delay
Delay
Delay
AM US 250 WB
through at Rt 22
F
141.6
927'
F
179.6
927'
F
99.7
926'
AM Quarry Exit
F
136.2
119,
F
136.2
125'
F
136.2
117'
AM Rt 22 SB
Left/Through at US
E
65.1
102'
E
65.3
82'
E
65.3
78'
250
AM US 250/Rt 22
F
96.6
2,276'
F
120.6
2,278'
E
74.6
2,268'
Overall
PM US 250 EB
F
117.8
513'
F
139.1
539'
D
42.1
503'
through at Rt 22
PM Quarry Exit
F
83.4
60'
F
85.4
60'
F
117.2
63'
PM Rt 22 SB
Left/Through at US
D
44.6
70'
D
46.9
84'
F
86.6
109,
250
PM US 250/11t 22
F
81.9
1,727'
F
98.4
1,994'
C
34.0
1,727'
Overall
PM Milton NB left
at US 250
D
37.5
167'
D
39.6
159'
E
79.3
PM Milton NB
C
29.2
59'
C
30.9
49'
E
56.7
60'
right at US 250
AM US 250/N
D
38.2
2,211'
D
40.2
2,471'
C
33.0
2,245'
Milton Overall
PM US 250/N
B
18.9
1,506'
C
22.9
1,583'
B
13.2
Milton Overall
Use Description
Units
Daily Trips
AM Peak
PM Peak
in
out
in
out
Single Family Detached
160
1602
29
1 89
100
60
Total Peak Hour Trips
118
160
Affordable Housing:
• Proffer #4 provides 15% affordable housing either on site or cash in lieu of units on site
• $422,500 (max) to support off -site affordable housing initiative
• OR 20 affordable dwelling units on site for sale or rent
Schools:
• Stone -Robinson Elementary School projected to be at capacity by the 2021/22 school year.
• Burley Middle School currently has moderate capacity conflicts and a high population growth forecast. ACPS has identified
the following capacity recommendation: "middle school facility planning study"
• Monticello High School currently has high capacity conflicts and a high population growth forecast. ACPS has identified
the following capacity recommendation: "high school center expansion"
24 13 19 56
rdable
Housin
Proffered Plan: Improvement to the property shall be in general accord with the concept plan, including eleven (11) major
elements.
Transportation/Transit: The owner shall design and install, with input and approval from VDOT, signal timing and coordination
improvements to the Route 250 corridor that improve the flow of traffic and improve the volume to capacity ratio on Route
250 at the intersections with Route 729 (N. Milton Road) and Route 22 (Louisa Road).
Cash Proffer for Transportation and/or Schools: Cash Proffer of $500,000 towards transportation, transit, or school capital
projects that directly benefit the residents of the Village of Rivanna.
Affordable Housing:
Cash Proffer: In lieu of constructing affordable dwelling units for 15% of the total number of units, the Owner has the
option to make a cash contribution to Albemarle County, Piedmont Housing Alliance, Habitat for Humanity, or
another local non-profit affordable housing provider in the amount of $21,125 for each such cash -in -lieu -of -
construction unit prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for that unit. This proffer specifies a maximum
cash proffer of $422,500.
For -sale Units: The Owner maintains the right to construct and sell all or a portion of the affordable units within the
property. The "Affordability" section of this proffer defines "affordable housing" as "units affordable to households
with incomes less than 80% of the area median income [AMI] ... such that housing costs ... do not exceed 30% of the
gross household income."
For Rent Units: The Owner maintains the right to construct and rent all or a portion of the affordable units within the
property. The "Affordability" section of this proffer defines "affordable housing" as "units affordable for rent by
households with incomes less than 80% of the area median income [AMI] ... such that rent payments ... do not exceed
30% of the gross household income."
Cost Index: This proffer establishes a method for the amount of each cash contribution required by proffer 3 to be adjusted
annually, to reflect any increase or decrease for the preceding calendar year in the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index.
Counterparts: This proffer establishes that "This Proffer Statement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of
which shall be an original and which shall constitute but one and the same instrument."
110
44
66
47 units remaining to be
constructed in platted sections. 19
units proposed in plat under
review.
43
32
11
11 units remaining to be
constructed in approved plats.
400
79
321
28 units remaining to be
constructed in approved site
plan/plat. 184 units proposed in
Phase 2 site plan. Block D residue
to be submitted for site review at
a future date.
553
155
398
Development Pipeline Information- Glenmore and Rivanna Village