HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB200200144 Application 2002-11-25 RECEIVED IN PLANNING
NOVEMBER 25,2002
t: OFFICE USE ONLY �j y W
Date Submitted i` 4� ARB Meeting Date /AO ARB# O� o o v — /
ON
i /'�
^Illy
Architectural Review Board Applications
❑Preliminary Building Permit ❑Final Building Permit ❑Amendment to a Building Permit
ig(Preliminary Site Development Plan ❑Final Site Development Plan ❑Amendment to a Site Dev.Plan
O No Fee Required O S160 Fee Required
❑Sign(Certificate of Appropriateness) ❑Advisory Review ❑Other
O$60 Fee Required O No Fee Required.
project Name t% US A00-7-1Qe • 57re A /5 1.
Tax Map and Parcel TAP 32 - 9/A °`4/4 1 Magisterial District ' Zoninp
Physical Street Address(if assigned) �20 d t' W/n We 77//Location of property(landmarks,intersections,or other) 1W• a9/1/ (2 7rn61°'0 7.X y -7•77Jr2r5 e747/7,.
I
ram'` Contact Person/Business Name: Wl&-arrtk ?MhtArri-s- A vP 1.'`�/i k4( / 11/
Address J*`(p/S We sOfif rK .0r. City, Oac"" State A/d zip;?1o2/7
Daytime Phone(? "f )S6//-3519c Fax E-mail4514<'/D7(033c° r7(1/1F4 //rid/e0i7lrlP.a1)"'J -
Owner of Record A 71A04/1) . ' QTy /( • )tR'l'n'e / 7i/ /y %WO/77Usi<
Address /g(00 al/e l'O/2N City a a!/o7 v//e state Vii zip Zz9(9/
Daytime Phone(4/3 V) y(o 0 -5-44 4/ f Fax# 4341 9 V-85t'`Xo E-mail
Applicant(who is the contact person representing?): / ` ' / d ` 66 6)i?4/Iy - "e v 41O/75
Address /040- W4 /7 /4rr IOQa City RtAPr7CA JI State a zip 2 3[-q •-
Daytime Phone 5�1v0-OS00 Fax# 504 S60 b778 E-mail_ 46eelemma5/126T
Architect:,/i 72 ), Y-7Ad ftek/eJ ?/Aftsd/iz9' . ,
Address56/S 1L�4�'rA ) City �Ad/4 ` ' State ive Zip ° /7
Daytime Phone(70" )S6/-349`/ Fax#7041 6760 3300 E-mail r//u/�0 g/// 60/3/%?to. G-o t72
OFFICE USE ONLY
Fee amount S Date Paid Check#_ By Who? Receipt#_ By:
0""'` County of Albemarle Department of Planning& Community Development
401 McIntire Road• Charlottesville,VA 22902 • Voice:(804)296-5823 :• Fax:(804)972-4012
12/21/01 Page 1 of 2
Description of application: (Describe your proposal. Attach a separate sheet if necessary.)
e IIr./✓y % 7 4 /5 Awe % 7 o ufrie i:7e r/? 7 a 7e ,
r2? Z /7ry ner vl0/26.er- l7e ,4 r/q,o! 7 7 9 4/i/ y ea/7
Cpshe'll 5 61/el dote" /ro 7'e7 ,e 64%, 64 /i i_c I7T'r aeer,/
7'Je a.9 " 4,74 5?/ o, 7%e-- t se m//�Q/%rna4Ve Ir/�/,� �Or�� ow/ Oe
(lied//i , 4'rB2 -- T e° v'///%1y ty/l/i%1e�l e act ingos riv"
v v/ -h ��,/e# seree7.•/,4yc//i4-cr 1 i7 7`�'®ri v//IV, 0/201
44 e emry 7oi Ae • M /r olio/ Ae$ are /olaell a/ r2 " reef
a-1 /,n e.77Z /fr.q...41/7//o/a7/a7/-6a h ,r/o mir7/e1z5. ,//l i%ro6J's ®l zy
f�e evis- ,/ney-Ad / 7' vhsawf arnd
abr/ Ftivglet %c k Q 7rVAS 7a c J I7 zr s co o////mra7/ e4vzs
cf, ./4s4(43.
This space for office use.
Owner/Applicant Must Read and Sign
This application is not complete without the appropriate checklist and submittal materials.
The foregoing information is complete and correct to the best of my knowledge.I have read and I understand the
provisions of e Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance.
Aiok: osz-/9.
Signature of Owner,Contract Purchaser,Agent Date
e""• 2- 0/0.‘?6/4 N /-(31/
Printed Name Daytime phone number of signatory
12/21/01 Page 2 of 2
r
...rove
- 71:°"1-11E-991.9•-•13..-irsoi.,-—-- -1 I1
— IOVEIL3S
1\A
— — I ' I
14 i i
, I
,.,,.. ,......, -b.1 7 i • L
.....
._ .
,..
1 - 17 v ,-%„ \ ' 13 1111"in 0 ..4.1 II 1 f • •
i ' 371111111 I P ) I I
r......... I 3(600 F 11-1,_4 .-._/
0 i
;1' I , ,9-...7 ,,,,.._ , ,_ _--i 3 2 I
4=
II o F",0 Es _mg -"' / , 4--4-- i tteln. .",'• I' -..f• Buji_tio7Nss. Co
__ ,, , fj A• r •... .
,,,...,,,,,R„,p% -1,71,-„is,_4,1 • _ 7..,,ilreiv .. Li,„. i - -.,- . - . , -- .
• -i,-,8 -,•,,,,
,....,, , . gb ''' -',1i,A: .;"•gr•L'-''' '-'--\ . -( , ,il2 _ -/ ..-.-'-' ''T- '-':,..7C‘'AI '. . ' zAll.T.--4«..,,,,-Imm..--,----1-- -- ,
•., , .... - --
0 t----- -, - ----- ------\ ,..\c----;-, . 5-....,,.....
li I
‘,..-- ,/ \ ;---_,i ,,,,f*traiiii_....„,..*•20,-........,_ ,--_7__ _ -,:. _.„_ . 0_0._ 4 . N. ...Z.:1r'
o E i I800' 750.
I ...=-',cp, r-,---. 1 1 ._ ._ 1 , 0,--":---/I- 4.
. 1 Al 1 8 Ili el-
H \,1- 's\\\.:\ gil k 14Zgal l'''1 "T'F;f;i -IL I I I /ill
0 o 2I A 4 f
• 42._' "-- ' -- --- -,rminfaustaxam4, I, 4 %...iT ., . . '.. - ,osaffitiliiiiiiir-'w4
8
I A 8 n n • 97 oo I -it
i .r-al
-.1P C-Ili . 1
2 mw IllelL111&1111 5' ,I, ..- __ / ,wal-1149) ,r,,1,,,_4 • !
.m411 :5„,/,/ rit„ ,4,„ ,,\,,,,,, , i ......„ ,..„...,, _, • TO THE SVI44,10,- .,,
: I -1 ,I -x.- kg, •i_ - •-',,, ,
1 Ilk
.."-
t?P''' ' Et , •.,,.„. Q
1 1 I
.0 « -,---- /
:13
- "00* r PA to,4 .I'LAN I
Pla8
H I ( 1 /r- -.-k._.•._0_00 if-404,440 t 7 ' '40-0—„'., 0 , , 1 , ,
EXISTING..13INT G.1
1
....2
M''' /C-3
, 1
A -, . , .1 ifflE. • r,.. w an',"0°•
I I -... :7°.M.:1-7.;—_ !WM , 't1PJ41445511;.7:74 ' 'MEE( , ',..04' .
3 r----i--10 ---i-j-k.. 0,-,..,0 i,...,_ _ qt,i,„,„„...„...„..w„.7,,„.
It:Opt f .1 , lc r;,r;51 ,i,:14 ;.,,,,_.vir 1 ,v.immi mmat•gmep 1.'": IP I
„ -a- I 1'''' •' °I1A -0 I •1- ,I ' # 4%IkItly• 1 . ' 0, W% C rAillfg1011- Heigi i * /44 / 'w,
II ii; 1
(---/-, L - ,.
2 ,. ..„ i.. ,
4.,,.
7 . , -0- ig,-- -.. .1.-..lack: -.;40.Wifill .• --- -t-callaggingilien,,Ifikt,•--_
f ,.... . _______ , .. 1 .,_;4•r. .-il -,,f_ ,404000T,..,4 „446A.nr.-,_2A..0. 1111. Alik — . . yrs xl.*Illihr 4-,..;""Oh,
..,4--___-IL _ 7.‘- 9:7,40.!,-.4,1=Pfre!2r.;.-'4VA:•17''VEIMIll „ ,gerj=6....... m!?511.;.1_311P.4i...._,_-,_,._51--- - 1
i2 3;4°. SI It_________Akr-.3.-3.49Fro-a'-------- _ '. ----124...-=---2.7- i.g..x..2,,,r,,9,,sat .....,:,..",._,V-i4;.7.,J,,,,,‘ ,,T,..a.:?•-.,. .--,...,., ,_- _ ''•0 -.-- 1
iltilog,-.91,..,,----.7.-741-:,,-----_,,,,,,77.4147.-_74. 11.i.,
---,• -NI..., • 11 Vol.. . . ....„Alit. , r xseal,,,s• r..--7- '",,, , Mit, .' /,. --„, :, 1 ,„,.,\
._. AT3/411-,r- .1,-.*-dot-.44.. 4 . 'VA, ‘•
,...;
_mow
Pl.
- ',--- - — ... :.'-.,. '-':- - •I ,, ,T , . , . Or,
,..-C,...., . -11.1,-, ' •-...wa:-.,...--- -.'i ' .,,,,
-------"'N-,...,--- -
gg ..‘t, .• - • , / ,, 1 , hr
_ — -—- -- -‘-tOISIZI211114ECTSA.11. . •
. . ,
-
EX1
........ ......- --.... --- .--- .-.-.-
-- I \i '77 • D.MIR I
+
<9-.. - -- ---: SRL
- -
•-•.:,. --- — -*--— 4? ______ 4,-.
- _
—
----- _ ,. .„
- - --
11- ;: arr-- i.D. -- IIIIIIIIa=
- —
0....vmsrvirg -711pres.
-........_- _._ ........r--—0-,
-
..„ .",,• -__ ___•
- — __ _
•-7-. us ROUTE 29 - _ _ •,. , . --
__,,,:.:
N,.., _
7.- ?-- -_..---
-$, 1 - -.,
.,. 4, .480.1G. VMEIGMI-MGINO' tikl.....3711f.44., -
Gmm.,...!4
F114.111.1 am,viz..vra.... ..v..., .... ...,. •, a..........w,;......_
„Ir. ...,..., .. (..... ...._ ,,,,,„
..... i......„...\\
.'".. 11 1.\. X .....r„, rnirfk, 1 7.
___ _ j IL' '.*;&4(.0.1.-,=•., "2'
:7"
CVS/pharmacy
Store No. 1554
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA
INN
H ,il Il ' I ,
I!' ; I
I I i NMI Pill ' ' . *`--" ' �11
= 1 H _, fi
lET
I , ,l r
,__ sliiL I l l I I t aall' 1- , _ _11r!t
JS/pbaNt»y
tt
1
{r ,-T , , •
IMP - --
I-,
r
ILL, I • F- .
7 W s
.SME111.11•11 MEOW
I 1■M -
i
RIC. HT ELEVATION
F A C A D E MATERIALS DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
- Brick I-eneer(base color redl brown) The building elevations have been designed to incorporate a full masonry exterior veneer
The hard canopy at the building entry has been scaled down from prototype dimensions
- Accent Brick L eneer(darker) to better accept the 24"high signage The use of alternate brick bonds will be used in
- Grey Standing Seam Metal Roofing panelized areas The building will include a mansard style roof to completely screen
HI-'AC units from mew, and the entry portic Metal roof pitches are placed at
- PGFRC Column Covers 18degreec to compliment traditional design proportions Windows along the CVS
- Fiberglass Molded Cornice storefront include divided light transoms,and a brick water table circles the building as
an additional means of addressing human scale
LITTLE
DIVERSIFIED ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTING
1125 02
RECEIVED IN PLANNING
NOVEMBER 25,2002
G-5 121-6483-00
Little & Associates Architects, lnc. Letter Of Transmitta40.0.1�',cf
.I:'�i4:l 5815 Westpark Drive
nnnnnn Charlotte,NC 28217
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Date: 11/22/2002 Job Number: 121-6483-00
Department of Planning & Community Development ATTENTION: Ms. Margaret Maliszewsky
401 McIntire Road Room 218 RE: CVS # 1554
Charlottesville, VA 22902 Charlottesville, VA
We are sending you:
nAttached 111 Under separate Cover via-
1-1 Shop drawings Prints Plans n Samples , Specifications
n Copy of letter Change Order n
Copies Date Number Description
8 Color Renderings 11 x 17
1 Color Rendering 24 x 36
8 C-3 Site Plan
8 C-4 Grading Plan
8 LA-1,2,3 Landscaping plans
1 Architectural Review Board Application
1 Set of Color Photographs of the Site (labeled)
These are transmitted as checked below:
❑For approval ❑Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval
❑x For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution
DAs requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints
El For review and comment ❑
❑ For bids due.
Remarks:
Margaret,
Enclosed we are sending you the information listed above, in reference to the Architectural Review Board
Preliminary Site Plan Approval for the CVS project listed above.
Please call me with any questions or comments you might have.
Thanks
RECEIVED IN PLANNING
NOVEMBER 25,2002
Signed: Ricardo Pulido
Rollout Retail Division
704-561-3494
November 15th CVS/PHARMACY STORE #1554
PURPOSE OF MEETING:
1. To explain the rationale and criteria behind this "traditional" site layout.
2. To understand the concerns of staff and how they may be addressed
Goal #1 - For County staff to understand that the Developer did not come forward with
a Site Plan that was done in a vacuum without respect for the desires of the County to comply with
the appropriate ordinance requirements and achieve an attractive entrance corridor. There were
many factors considered and layouts reviewed prior to this design.
Goal # 2 - To provide the specific reasons why the basic "traditional" layout was warranted in this
case. In addition to the site constraints, these include the Owner's requirements and the
Developer/tenant's requirements.
Goal #3 —To explain the concerns of staff and possible ideas for addressing these concerns.
• In this case, We did not start with a "clean slate" which is typically possible in larger
developments such as Hollymead Town Center. This site is not part of the HTC rezoning.
• Redevelopment - This site has an existing bldg that is underutilized and not attractive. With
the exception of short periods of use, the bldg has been vacant for several years.
• When reviewing the scale of this development, it fits with the properties to the North along
RT 29 towards Airport Rd and across RT 29.
• There are specific existing conditions which have critical effect on this layout. These include
the following:
- Travelways that exist with cross access easements (that join 6 parcels)
- Shared entrances to serve the interconnected parcels
- Existing parking and travelways that need to be aligned
- Utilities - high pressure waterline across the front of the site
- Sanitary sewer existing and proposed to serve this site and be extended beyond
- Site composed of two parcels that have a narrow dimension along RT 29. It is deeper
than it is wide.
• Owner's criteria for redevelopment:
- Re-development is more difficult than new development. To support the value of the
land, a viable tenant for this zoning with an established business was needed
- A use that could be successful within a bldg of similar size/scale to be consistent with
existing bldgs that compose Seminole Commons at FL and other RT29 Bldgs
- A use that does fit with (rather than compete with) the existing tenants that occupy
Seminole Commons
- A tenant whose bldg design could be consistent with and compliment the architecture
of Seminole Commons.
- Over the past year, numerous uses have been actively considered as possible tenants
and for various reasons turned out to not be feasible.
- As a Re-developed property, there will be a significant increase in the tax revenue base
to the County.
• Developer's specific criteria for meeting the needs of CVS which are not necessarily as
flexible as most retail stores. These include:
1. Relocation of an established CVS/Pharmacy from Forest Lakes SC — strip stores
2. Upgrade the service to patrons & achieve the required interior store layout with
pharmacy& drive thru
3. That the drive thru provide one drop-off& one pick-up lane for pharmacy patrons
4. With a drive thru circulation— a pass by lane is appropriate (and required)
5. adequate, convenient & safe parking for all patrons (as required)
6. internal circulation for easy access to parking, the drive-thru, and the service entrance
at the rear of the bldg for trucks
THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN OR COULD BE DONE TO MITIGATE CONCERNS:
1. Hide the service area (at rear)
2. Minimize the view of the drive thru—locate on the side away from EC view
3. The narrow dimension of the bldg towards RT 29 —helps with perception of scale &
mass
4. Parking rows are 14 to 16 spaces in each row—Compact parking layout. This is a
small scale compared to the majority of commercial uses on RT 29. The area of the
parking lot is proportional to the bldg. If you measure the depth of the overall parking
area at the front, it is approx. equal to the depth of the bldg. The width of the parking
area is only 4 spaces wider than the width of the bldg.
5. Only one row of parking on the South side of the bldg which is viewed from EC
6. The two double load parking strips are separated by a 10ft wide landscape median
7. IDEAS/SUGGESTIONS
8.
9.
10.
11. -
CONCLUSION:
Although it is not always evident, Developer's do prefer to bring a SP to the County that
meets the expectation of the County ordinance and if possible incorporates features that
are preferred to win favorable support throughout the process. It costs less and saves time
to go with the flow. In this case, there were numerous layouts with various bldg/parking
locations considered and evaluated. None of these could meet the requirements for
parking & internal circulation to function properly.
It is difficult to understand when the County Ordinance does not require parking to be
relegated to the rear of bldgs. There are no applicable proffers to apply in this case. The
interconnection of this parcel with the existing development to the North with cross access
2
easements and shared entrances to serve the overall group of parcels has been given
priority in this design. The front bldg set back per the ordinance has been met.
The ordinance does address location of parking within a convenient distance to the bldg
entrance. This has also been met.
Although I don't agree that every individual Site Plan should pass or fail based upon a
point by point evaluation based upon the 12 Principles of the Neighborhood Model, there
are a couple that are accomplished:
I. The 3rd principle which refers to Interconnected Streets could be applied to
the overall vicinity of travelways serving 6 parcels. This plan does reflect the
interconnection of several commercial properties which is essential to
limiting entrances onto RT 29.
II. The 10th principle—Redevelopment Rather than Abandonment is directly
applicable and the factors that effect this layout once understood can explain
why the more traditional layout was necessary.
III. The 6th principle—The CVS architect with the input from ARB will work to
achieve an attractive building of human scale that will fit with existing
adjacent structures especially those immediately adjacent and across Rt 29.
Principle 7 which indicates a preference for relegated parking seems to be the incentive
to move buildings to a close proximity to "neighborhood streets". This may work within
neighborhoods such as the HTC where neighborhood streets are a lower category than
RT 29. Rt 29 is not currently a "neighborhood street" by its use and characteristics such
as:
- speed limit
- limited entrances
- limited restricted crossovers—physical barrier/median
- overall existing physical characteristics ie number of lanes,
- with the removal of Alternate 10 from the transportation plan, the possible
upgrades to RT 29 will create characteristics even less typical of"neighborhood
streets".
In this case, parking relegated to the rear of the bldg doesn't hide the parking because it
will still be viewed from the EC from the viewpoint of traveling in the Northbound lane.
3