Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP202100062 Approval - County 2021-09-09�r County of Albemarle m COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT September 9, 2021 Andrew Vinisky Habitat for Humanity Mr. Vinisky: Megan Nedostup, AICP Development Process Manager mnedostup@aIbemarle.orq Telephone: (434)296-5832 ext.3004 The Agent for the Board of Supervisors hereby grants administrative approval to the above referenced initial site plan. This approval shall be valid for a period of five (5) years from the date of this letter, provided that the developer submits a final site plan for all or a portion of the site within one (1) year after the date of this letter as provided in section 32.4.3.1 of Chapter 18 and thereafter diligently pursues approval of the final site plan. In accordance with Chapter 18 Section 32.4.2.8 Early or Mass Grading may be permitted after the following approvals are received: 1. Engineering approval of a VSMP plan meeting the requirements of Chapter 17 of the Code of the County of Albemarle. 2. Approval of all easements for facilities for stormwater management and drainage control. 3. Submittal of a tree conservation checklist with areas for tree preservation identified. The final site plan will not be considered to have been officially submitted until the following items are received: 1. A final site plan that satisfies all of the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code. 2. Applicable fee outlined in the application. Please submit 8 copies of the final plans OR electronic plans to the Community Development Department (for ACSA, please submit a copy of construction plans directed to Alex Morrison). The assigned Lead Reviewer will then distribute the plans to all reviewing agencies. Once you receive the first set of comments on the final site plan, please work with each reviewer individually to satisfy their requirements. The Department of Community Development shall not accept submittal of the final site plan for signature until tentative approvals for the attached conditions from the following agencies/reviewers have been obtained_ SRC Members: Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer) Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner) Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue Albemarle County Service Authority Virginia Department of Transportation Albemarle County Information Services (E911) Albemarle County Building Inspections If you have any questions about these conditions or the submittal requirements please feel free to contact me at Extension 3004, mnedostup@albemarle.org. Sincerely, �-I' �' , �"� Megan Nedostup �r County of Albemarle m COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT September 7, 2021 Andrew Vinisky Habitat for Humanity RE: SDP-2021-062-Southwood Village 2- Initial Site Plan Mr. Vinisky: Megan Nedostup, AICP Development Process Manager mnedostup@albemarle.org Telephone: (434) 296-5832 ext. 3004 The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Initial comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer) Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner) Albemarle County Information Services (E911) Albemarle County Building Inspections (Building Official) Albemarle County Planning Services (Architectural Review Board) Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue Albemarle County Service Authority Virginia Department of Health Virginia Department of Transportation Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that will be required to be resolved prior to Site Plan approval. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Megan Nedostup County of Albemarle I'll COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM To: Andrew Vinisky, Habitat for Humanity From: Megan Nedostup Date: September 7, 2021 Re: SDP2021-62 Southwood Village 2- Initial Site Plan Megan Nedostup, AICP Development Process Manager mnedostup@albemarle.org Telephone: (434) 296-5832 ext.3004 The Planner for the Planning Services Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. The site plan has an outstanding fee of $448 for mailing/notice. Fee must be paid prior to approval of initial site plan. 2. See attached direction from the Post Master regarding group mailboxes. Please coordinate location with the Post Master. 3. [32.5.2(b); 32.5.2(q)] The trip generation should be cumulative, revise to include all submitted blocks in Phase 1, not just Village 1 and 2. This should include the market rate and LIHTC areas as well. This will allow quick confirmation that the total trip generation does not exceed 5,000 per the Code of Development. 4. [32.5.2(b); 4.12.61 Show where the garage parking is located. Per the COD garages are only permitted to face framework streets in Blocks 3-4, all other blocks do not permit street facing garages on framework streets. It appears that lots 39-46 are proposing street facing garages on Horizon Rd (a framework street), which is located in Block 5 and would not be permitted under the COD. 5. [32.5.2 (n)] Provide the dimensions for all existing and proposed improvements on the layout plan. Including: walkways, fences, walls, parking lots, parking spaces (including garage spaces), other paved areas, driveways, etc. In addition, provide the material types for all walks parking lots, and driveways. Many dimensions are not being shown, example: the width of the driveway/parking area. a) The length of the driveways should be a minimum of 18' (not blocking the sidewalk) to provide adequate area for parking. Providing anything less will encourage residents to park there and then part of their vehicle will be blocking the travel way and emergency access. This has been a problem in other developments. Adjust the units so that 18 feet can be maintained as necessary. 6. [32.5.2 (a)] Include the ZMA number on the plans with the zoning district note (ZMA2018-003). 7. [32.5.2(b)] Show the maximum setback on the layout plans. [Code of Development, page 16; 4.16] Show/indicate what facilities will be provided in the amenity spaces and playground. Per the COD this is to be decided at site plan (page 16). 8. [32.5.2(n)] If lighting will be provided, it will need to shown and a lighting and photometric plan must be submitted with the final site plan in accordance with 4.17. All lighting over 3000 lumens must be cut off. 9. [32.5.2(u)] For NMDs the following is required in the site plan: a) A phasing plan (this is important for comment #3 above) b) Building elevations for all new or modified structures 10. [ZMA; COD page 15] It appears on the greenspace chart that the amount required for trail and path is not being met (1.05 required vs 0.90 provided). Revise this plan, or other plans to meet the minimum requirement. Since this is the last plan for Phase 1, this needs to be addressed. 11. 132.5.7.9.71 Parking spaces of four spaces or more must be screened from streets and residential zoned areas in accordance with this section. Screening will need to be provided for the parking lot at final site plan stage. 12. [CDBG requirement] Provide an ADA curb ramp in front of the Monacan Nation Park so that visitors to the park can access it. In addition, a railing should be provided on the retaining wall at the back of the park to prevent visitors from falling off. The design of the park will need to be coordinated with members of the Monacan Nation and the County. MANAGER, OPERATIONS PROGRAM SUPPORT UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE POUNITEDSTATES T POSTAL SERVICE Date: November 23,2015 Subject: New Developments In April 2012, the USPS revised regulation to clarify options for delivery and to provide the USPS greater autonomy in determining how deliveries are added to the Postal Service network. While curbline and sidewalk delivery remain viable and approved modes of delivery, the USPS will determine how and when to approve these modes of delivery consistent with existing Postal Operations Manual (POM) regulation regarding in -growth and both establishment and extension of delivery. Each year, new delivery addresses are added to our city, rual and contract routes which has a major impact to our delivery cost. To control costs, we need to ensure new residential deliveries are being made via centralized delivery. We must adhere to the guidelines that govern establishment of new delivery. The City/County authorities (Planning and Zoning) can not give approval of delivery service. The Postal Service cannot honor agreements that have been made between Planning and Zoning and the developer. At a minimum, the USPS will work with the builders and developers to determine what the best mode of delivery is for the area prior to establishing or extending delivery service. However, as a national agency, the USPS reserves the right to establish delivery in the most consistent and cost effective means viable to meet our federal mandate of providing a free form of service that best meets the need to establish and maintain a safe, reliable and efficient national Postal Service. Please review the changes to the POM regarding Modes of Delivery and Delivery Equipment. The changes are designed to enhance our ability to increase centralized and CBU delivery. • Centralized and CBU delivery is now the default mode of delivery in business areas. Any exceptions to centralized or CBU delivery mode in business areas must be approved by the District. (631.2) For new residential delivery, CBU is now the default. Exceptions to permit curbline delivery must be approved by the District. (631.32) • New deliveries within an existing block with an established mode of delivery no longer assume the existing mode of delivery. We can require a more efficient mode of delivery (sidewalk delivery, for example). (631.41) • While we do not control addresses for buildings, we do control the sequential ordering of addresses within any centralized delivery equipment. (631.442) If more than one building in a complex has the same street address, the delivery equipment must be grouped at a single location even if some of the units are in a different building. (631.452) • Centralized delivery or CBU is the default option for delivery in mobile homes or trailer parks that are permanent residences. Any exceptions to centralized or CBU delivery mode must be approved by the District (631.462b) • For dormitories and residence halls not directly affiliated with colleges, the Postal Service determines the mode of delivery and can require the property owner to accept mail for all the tenants. We will not distribute mail into centralized delivery equipment. (631.52) • Delivery equipment must conform with the USPS standards for CBUs and high-rise delivery equipment, USPS STD 4C wall mounted mail receptacles. Local offices do not have the authority to approve any other centralized delivery equipment. (631.441) -2- • When obsolete delivery equipment is replaced in multi -unit buildings, it must be replaced with equipment that meets current standards. (632.621) The USPS standards include options for parcel lockers that we should ensure are provided. There was also great consideration regarding safety of delivery, which also resulted in the determination the the type of delivery warrented in your area. Keith Smarte Crozet Postmaster 1210 Crozet Virginia 22932 Work 434-823-9847 Cell434-529-0241 Keith.A. Sm a rteO usps.aov 2() COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Stephen C. Brich, P.E. 1401 East Broad Street (804)786-2701 Commissioner Richmond, Virginia 23219 Fax: (804) 786-2940 August 31, 2021 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Attn: Matt Wentland Megan Nedostup Re: SUB-2021-00128 — Southwood Redevelopment — Village 2 - Road Plans SDP-2021-00062 — Southwood Redevelopment — Village 2 - ISP Dear Mr. Wentland and Ms. Nedostup: The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section, has reviewed the above referenced plans as submitted by Timmons Group, dated 8 July 2021, and find the following: 1. The Radii for road A does not meet the minimum 200' radius required per RDM Appendix B(1)-7. 2. Show "No Parking" signage on all roads without designated parking including the beginning and end signage. 3. Please review RDM B(1)-28 I for Private entrances. The Standard CG-91) entrance gutter is to be used for most single family residential entrances with curb and gutter. Please show the CG-91) detail on the plan sheet. 4. Please review RDM Appendix B(1)-45 E for Landscape Considerations. 5. Please review RDM Appendix B(1)-53 H for Utility considerations. Please show any conduits to be installed for power, fiber optic lines, etc. If further information is desired, please contact Max Greene at 434-422-9894. A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process. Sincerely, VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Adam J. Moore, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Charlottesville Residency SDP202100062 Southwood Redevelopment Village 2 — Initial Site Plan Richard Nelson <rnelson@serviceauthority.org> Tue 8/31/2021 3:16 PM To: Megan Nedostup <mnedostup@albemarle.org> CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Good afternoon Megan, I recommend SDP202100062 Southwood Redevelopment Village 2 — Initial Site Plan for approval with the following conditions: Submit a PDF copy of the utility to ACSA for review, ATN: Alex Morrison. RWSA sewer capacity certification will be required. Show profile of existing sewer through the site with any proposed grading. Thanks, Richard Nelson Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22911 (434) 977-4511 Southwood Redevelopment Village 2 comments Dyon Vega <dvega@rivanna.org> Fri 8/20/2021 10:56 AM To: Megan Nedostup <mnedostup@albemarle.org> Cc: vfort@rivanna.org <vfort@rivanna.org>; Richard Nelson <rnelson@serviceauthority.org> CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe. Megan, RWSA has reviewed the Southwood Redevelopment Village 2 Initial Site Plan dated 07/08/21 By Timmons Group and has the following comments. General Comments: RWSA will require a sewer flow acceptance prior to final site plan approval. The request will need to be sent to us by ACSA and will include the following: • Estimated average daily dry weather sewage flow (ADDWF) • Point of connection into RWSA system (which manhole) • Number of units/square footage • Estimated in-service date Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Dyon Vega Civil Engineer RIVANNA WATER & SEWERAUTHORITY Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority (434) 977-2970, Ext. 170 695 Moores Creek Lane Charlottesville, VA 22902 www.nvanna.org Review Comments for SDP2O21OOO62 Initial Site Plan Project Name: SOUTHWOOD REDEVELOPMENT - VILLAGE 2 - INITIAL - DIGITAL Date Completed: Wednesday, September 01, 2021 Department/Division/Agency: Review Status: Reviewer: Howard Lagomarsino Fire Rescue Requested Changes 1) Parking on roads without sufficient widths to accommodate parking without reducing the travel way width causes an obstruction for access of fire apparatus. As a result, the fire code requires an unobstructed travel way width of 20 ft when the height of a building is less than 30 ft and 26 ft when height of building (to edge of roof - not peak of roof) over 30 feet. The roads in this plan providing fire apparatus access routes shall have a minimum, unobstructed travel way width of 20 feet. Though the proposed roads exceed 20 ft., there are large sections of those roads where on street parking is not part of the plan and any such parking is not allowed since it reduces the travel way width below 20 feet. As a result, those areas, require no parking signs: b) The following roads require no parking signs on one side: i) Horizon Road ii) Road A 2) 1 do not see no parking signs indicated on the plans for those roads. They are required to meet the maintenance of unobstructed width requirements of the fire code. Please indicate them on the plan. 3) Move hydrant from cul de sac on Horizon closer to intersection with Road A to meet the hydrant spacing of a hydrant every 500 feet with no building more than 250 feet from a hydrant 4) Please indicate on the plans the required ISO fire flow for the buildings 5) Please indicate the fire flow available on the plans County of Albemarle GEOGRAPHIC DATA SERVICES OFFICE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS - E911 APPLICATION#: SDP202100062 TMP: 090A1-00-00-OOIE0 DATE: 9/1/21 Road "A" will require one road name. Elise Kiewra e ki ew ra (3a I be m a rl e.o rg tel: 434-296-5532 ext. 3030 fax:434-972-4126 This site will require a one (1) new private road name. Per Sec. 7-200-B of the County's Road Naming and Property Numbering Ordinance (Page 2 of PDF). "It is intended by this article that all roads within the County which serve or are designed to serve three or more addressable structures will be named; and that all addressable structures within the County will be assigned property numbers. We recommend providing three (3) candidate names for each road to our office for review, in case your first choices are not acceptable. A PDF version of the Ordinance and Manual can be found here: https:Hgisweb.albemarle.orglgisdata/Road Naming and Property Numbering Ordinance and Manual.pdf Please consult the County's Road Name Index to check your road names prior to submittal. The Index can be found here: httos://Ifweb.albemarle.org/Forms/RoadNamelndex Parcel and mapping information can be found here: https:Hgisweb.albemarle.org/gi2v 51/Viewer.asIx If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. W W W.ALBEMARLE.ORG 401 McIntire Road, Suite 228 1 Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 Review Comments for SDP2O21OOO62 Initial Site Plan Project Name: SOUTHWOOD REDEVELOPMENT - VILLAGE 2 - INITIAL - DIGITAL Date Completed: Thursday, September 09, 2021 Department/Division/Agency: Review Status: Reviewer: Matthew Wentland CDD Enoineerino I Requested Changes 1. The VSMP plan will need to be approved prior to Final Site Plan approval. Review of the VSMP plan may generate additional comments on the Final Site Plan. 2. The road plan will need to be approved prior to Final Site Plan approval. Review of the road plan may generate additional comments on the Final Site Plan. 3. Show the Forest & Open Space easement from the Village 1 plans. No improvements are allowed in this area (including stone dust trails) and any grading will require DEQ BMP Spec. 4 Soil Amendments to be used. 4. The buffer disturbance from the basin will require mitigation. Mitigation outside of the buffer will require additional easements. 5. Per the Code of Development, residential lots are to be located outside of stream buffers, preserved slopes, and floodplains. Grading for the lots should also be outside the buffer. 6. Private drainage easements should be a minimum of 10' wide. The easement width calculation from the Design Standards Manual should still be used for pipes not at minimum depth. 7. Drainage easements that are not a constant width should be labelled as variable width. Some of the other easement widths appear to be incorrectly labelled (such as the 10' label on the easement for pipe 101).