Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA199400017 Review Comments 1995-01-03 STAFF PERSON: Amelia McCulley PUBLIC HEARING: January 3 , 1995 STAFF REPORT - VA 94-17 OWNER / APPLICANT: (Owner) Daniel D. Shifflett (Applicant) Joe Adlesic TAX MAP / PARCEL: TM 26/ Parcel 12A ZONING: RA, Rural Areas with Flood Hazard Overlay and SS, Scenic Stream Overlay ACREAGE: 6. 43 acres LOCATION: Along the Moormans River on the south side of Rt. 614 , about 0 . 1 mile east of the intersection with Rt. 674 . REQUEST: The applicant requests a variance from Section 30. 5 . 5 . 2 . (d) (6) , Scenic Stream Overlay, to waive a,b, and e. This amendment to a previous variance (VA 87-2 Donald W. Foster) , is to allow construction of a bridge crossing to access a proposed house. The present variance is to add relief from 6a and 6e. The prior variance granted relief from 6b. This variance is necessary due to the facts that neither a house nor a stream crossing currently exist. This Section, from within the Scenic Area-Overlay District uses, states: "Within the immediate environs of any stream designated in section 30 . 5.2 . , no person shall commence any use involving the construction of any structure, the cutting of any living tree over six (6) inches caliper measured at six (6) inches above ground level, or the grading or other like physical alterations of the immediate environs of such stream except as follows: (Amended 9-9-92) . . . d. The following uses by special use permit only; . . . 6. Bridges, causeways and other similar structures designed for pedestrian and/or vehicular access; provided that the board of supervisors shall find, by clear and convincing evidence, in addition to the findings required by section 31.2 . 4 . 1, that: (a) such bridge or other structure is to be located at the site of an existing bridge, ford or other stream crossing; Staff Report VA-94-17 Joe Adelsic Page 2 (b) such existing crossing is regularly used, and such bridge or other structure is to be used, as to the sole means of access to one or more existing, lawfully occupied dwellings; (c) no alternative means of access to such dwellings is physically practicable; (d) no such alternative means of access has been abandoned, aliened or otherwise relinquished by the voluntary act or omission of the owner of the land upon which such dwellings are located since December 10, 1980; (e) such bridge or other structure is necessary to prevent, eliminate or substantially alleviate a hazard to the life or property of any resident of the county; (f) such bridge or other structure is so designed as to pose the minimum practical disruption of the environment of the stream consistent with the other provisions hereof; and (g) such bridge or other structure shall comply with all applicable state and federal law including, but not limited to, Chapters 3 . 5, 7,8, 9 and 20 of Title 62 . 1 of the Code of Virginia (1950) , as amended, to the extent that any or all of the same may be applicable in a particular case. (Added 1-19-83) " This special use permit language is in addition to the standard criteria and requires that the Board make positive findings by clear and convincing evidence of all seven statements (a-g) . On February 17 , 1987 , the Board of Zoning Appeals approved a variance to waive the finding (6b) that this crossing will serve one or several existing, lawfully occupied dwellings. Then, as is the case today, the only remains of a house is a chimney. For reasons unknown, this proposal was not pursued and the accompanying special permit was indefinitely deferred. Staff Report VA-94-17 Joe Adelsic Page 3 HISTORY OF SCENIC STREAM CROSSINGS: Dr. and Mrs. W.D. Buxton applied for VA 82-66 to allow a man-made river crossing to be constructed in the floodway of the Moormans River, a variance of 65 feet. (At the time, there was no special permit provision and the scenic stream setback applied. ) ZTA 82-17 was approved January 19, 1983 to respond to a Zoning Administrator's question regarding the provision of bridges and other like structures in the Scenic Stream Overlay District. The staff report notes "As Staff recalls, a major concern of the Scenic Rivers Committee in drafting the zoning provisions was encroachment of barriers to canoe and other vessel passage. " This amendment added subsection d(6) to Section 30. 5. 5. 2 . On July 6, 1983 , the Board of Supervisors approved SP 83-18 for Dr. and Mrs. W.D. Buxton to allow them to convert a concrete ford to a low-water culvert bridge. This crossing was to serve two dwellings. On August 11, 1993 , the Board approved SP 93-19 for the construction of a footbridge on the adjoining property owned by the Alfords. That property was already served by an open ford. RELEVANT HISTORY ON THIS PROPERTY: A plat by Frank A. Gregg, surveyor dated June, 1972 shows this property as Lot B consisting of 8 . 3 acres. This property was landlocked with the front property line going to the center of the Moormans River. On December 3, 1986, Donald W. and Deborah C. Foster purchased this property from Orbin F. and Adeline R. Carter. In December, 1986, Mr. Foster applied for SP 86-95 for a stream crossing of the floodplain within a scenic stream. In May, it was indefinitely deferred. VA 87-2 Donald W. Foster was approved on February 17, 1987, to allow a bridge to be constructed over the Moormans River. This variance was to provide relief from the requirement that the bridge serve an existing, lawfully occupied dwelling (6b) . A May, 18, 1988 plat by B. Aubrey Huffman and Associates, Ltd. showed this property, Lot B. This plat corrected the acreage to 6. 0 +/- acres from 8 . 3 acres. Staff Report VA-94-17 Joe Adelsic Page 4 The preceding plat was used with the conveyance from the Fosters to Bronius and Barbara Sakalas on May 9, 1988. On September 13, 1990 this same property was sold to Daniel D. Shif f lett. On September 25, 1990, a plat was approved adding an existing lot consisting of 0. 43 acres to this lot. This transaction provided this lot with frontage on Rt 614. The 1991/92 County Real Estate Appraisal shows this property with a value of $9300 and of $7400. The land adjustments section notes "no frontage. River across front of parcel. Have to cross-not easy. " The 1993/94 Appraisal shows a value of $8400. The notes section states "river along ftg. Topo either low or steep. " ******* On August 29, 1994, Mr. Adlesic made application for SP 94-27 . This special permit request is to allow a bridge to be constructed in the floodplain and within the scenic stream overlay. This application has been indefinitely deferred pending hearing of this variance. Once it was under public review by the Planning Commission, the issue was raised regarding the fact that there was no existing house or crossing. The Zoning Administrator determined that the ordinance section was written so as to require that for approval of the special permit relating to the scenic stream, the Board of Supervisors must make positive findings of all subsections (conditions a-g) . The only relief would be to either rewrite the ordinance (a ZTA) or to seek a variance. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY: As a result of a combination of this property with another unbuildable lot, this property has road frontage on Rt. 614 . It includes the river and extends up to the top of a ridge. This property consists of both bottomland with an area of floodplain and critical slopes with rock outcroppings rising up to the ridgeline. A wet stream exists along a portion of the property between the river and the sloped area. It is grown in mature hardwoods and may likely be classified as consisting of areas of wetlands. This lot is vacant. Property owned by the Alfords is adjacent to the west and is improved with a dwelling and footbridge. In this area, the floodplain is extensive and covers the road, Rt 614 . Staff Report VA-94-17 Joe Adelsic Page 5 The river along this property ranges from wide and shallow to deep and steep. The area proposed for crossing has high banks to require less disturbance for bridge crossing. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CROSSING: The proposed crossing will be a span bridge constructed of steel I-beams with wood decking. It will be located 12-15 feet above the water level. The footings and abutments can be placed on top of the river banks beyond the water's edge. The Virginia Department of Transportation has approved the proposed driveway location. The proposed location will provide the shortest route to the proposed house site. There is no access from adjoining properties. The river frontage would not be easy (if even possible) to ford by most passenger vehicles. APPLICABLE COUNTY LAND USE REGULATIONS: Zoning Ordinance: . The SS, Scenic Stream Overlay District is applied only to the Moormans River. Regulations include limitations to disturbance adjacent to the river, and require a special permit for the construction of certain devices and/or structures. . As previously stated, whether or not this involved a scenic stream, a special permit would be required for a bridge crossing the floodplain. The variance is not originating from the floodplain regulations. The house, a habitable structure shall not be constructed within the floodplain overlay. . The General Regulations within the Zoning Ordinance include requirements relating to the building site and septic site. A full primary and reserve area adequate to serve a 3-bedroom house are required. The building site shall be setback 100 ft from a tributary stream. Water Resource Protection Ordinance (County Code administered by the County Engineering Department) : . This ordinance requires a 100 ft buffer area adjacent to tributary streams and nontidal wetlands. Requests for an exception are permitted, and shall include a water quality impact assessment. In the event this property includes wetlands, an exception to decrease the buffer will be necessary for construction of a home and septic field. Staff Report VA-94-17 Joe Adelsic Page 6 Runoff Control Ordinance (County Code administered by the County Engineering Department) : . This ordinance requires a 100 ft setback from the edge of any tributary stream for the construction of any sewage disposal system. This proposal appears to be in compliance. * As with any construction of this type, the BOCA Code dictates the building specifications. This report will not comment on that aspect. APPLICANT'S JUSTIFICATION: The applicant's justification is found on the variance application. It will be discussed within the proceeding sections. STAFF COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION: Note: This is not a review of whether or not the bridge special permit should be granted. That is separate action by the Board of Supervisors. Approval of this variance would not guarantee approval of the special permit. A variance of this type can be more complex than others and inevitably considers the question of reasonable use of the property. To provide the statutory context of a variance, portions of the State Code will be shown in excerpt. Section 15. 1-495. 2 of the State Code allows "variance as will not be contrary to the public interest, when, owing to special conditions a literal enforcement of the provisions will result in unnecessary hardship; provided that the spirit of the ordinance shall be observed and substantial justice done . . . " It continues to state that by reason of the exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary situation or condition of such piece of property, strict application of the terms of the ordinance would effectively prohibit or alleviate a clearly demonstrable hardship approaching confiscation, as distinguished from a special privilege or convenience sought by the applicant. Without argument, there is an exceptional topographic condition and other situations of this property. Without this crossing, the river would have to be waded by foot. The SS, Scenic Stream overlay district does not allow grading, cutting of trees or other disturbance within 15 ft of the edge of the stream at mean annual flow level. Therefore, it could not be used for a regular crossing of other types of vehicles, such as farming or logging equipment. Staff Report VA-94-17 Joe Adelsic Page 7 The size, shape, slope and other conditions appear to eliminate any typical farming or forestry-related use of the lot even if access were available. There is no evidence that there has been such use of the property. As noted previously in this report, development for a home will present certain other challenges. It appears based on what is currently known that a house could be built subject to agency approvals for building and septic and possibly an exception for wetland buffer. Therefore, it is not a case of creating a buildable lot; instead, it is allowing access to a buildable lot. If it were not for approval of this variance, the lot would not then be buildable except for the hand carrying of materials and equipment across the river. Condition a requires findings that "such bridge or other structure is to be located at the site of an existing bridge, ford or other stream crossing. " The crossing does not exist. However, part of a footbridge is visible at the proposed crossing location, hanging from a tree. It appears to have been destroyed by a former flood. It is not known when it was destroyed. It is clear that it was not designed under current standards and carried only foot traffic. Condition a requires findings that "such bridge or other structure is necessary to prevent, eliminate or substantially alleviate a hazard to the life or property of any resident of the county. " Wading in times of high water is hazardous. Any personal property or animals on the other side would not be accessible and could become flooded during a storm event. In conclusion, staff recommends approval for cause: 1. The applicant has provided evidence that the strict application of the ordinance would produce undue hardship. Without approval of a variance to allow a stream crossing, the property would have to remain in open space and could not be improved with a dwelling. Given the size and other limiting factors, there appears to be no economically viable use of the property. This is in no way a convenience or special privilege for the applicant/property owner. 2 . The applicant has provided evidence that such hardship is not shared generally by other properties in the same zoning district and the same vicinity. Staff Report VA-94-17 Joe Adelsic Page 8 Staff has not conducted a study of all properties to determine how many, if any others, would be similarly situated. It does appear evident that other properties either have existing crossings and/or existing homes, or have alternative access, or have alternative use of the property. 3. The applicant has provided evidence that the authorization of such variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and that the character of the district will not be changed by the granting of the variance. With regards to the floodplain, the bridge will be designed to create no net increase in the flood levels and it is anchored to prevent downstream damage. The State Scenic River Advisory Committee met to review the proposed special permit. The Committee recommended approval with several conditions. The conditions relate to the natural material construction of the bridge, as well as others relating to the earth disturbance. There is no apparent substantial detriment. It should be noted that this application is to be viewed independently on its own merits, and is not in itself precedent-setting. Should the Board find cause for approval, staff recommends the following conditions: 1. Approval is subject to approval of the special permit for the stream crossing. This shall include, but not be limited to conditions relating to bridge location, materials and construction; 2 . Any bridge expansion is subject to amendment of this variance. Staff Report VA-94-17 Joe Adlesic Page Nine ATTACHMENTS - VA-94-17, JOE ADLESIC A. Location Map (Tax Map) B. Variance Application C. 1988 Plat of Property D. 1990 (Current) Deed and Plat of Property E. Report and Approval Letter for VA-87-02 Donald Foster Stream Crossing F. Floodplain Map G. Bridge Design H. State & Federal Agency Review I. Recommended Conditions for Special Permit Approval J. Comments from County Engineering Department K. Comments from Scenic River Advisory Committee L. Zoning Administrator's Memo of October 27 , 1994 Re: Variance G7Attachment "A" Location Map (Tax Map) ) r' _ Lk-7 8 21 ' \ 0 . / \2OB r 42 SEE 1OB 9 : 0/ (1 I ( 25-28 , 4.• 2 OA IOC i7►.i 19 \1 4 10c ' If\ 2 0 - ---i------ 1111‘...\ - 10 4_ , Illt '>'c. /\ --- c";--4 r . 14c 14i\ ,gG 1411 14 148 i 14N w , IAA \ IE I I A IOD ; I4A ' 14F 14 14J I 14 I1B P lO � 14H --� F 4 •a • 14M 14i/ , IIc ' t a��Aw,� .vak I I 11 D 12 12A �..� i • e. g oo<� SEE Attachment 5 _____y• Tax Map 26 ► +� y - c . 4C1 - Attachment "B" :ounty of Albemarl( Variance Application Department of Zoning 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 (804) 296-5875 FAX (804) 972-4060 VA- qi-) - l n DATE: .Q y FEE: $95. 00 r VARIANCE APPLICATION OWNER (as currently listed in Real Estate) Name ii)0_.41, �/ . � Jef Phone (26¢) $Z3 - 7705 Address P- 0 kx 12 C�-< I 1 VA Z Z q3Z APPLICANT (if different from above) Name 'Jo e /Lae 5 %G Phone (b(O4) q7( - 9612- Address / . O . &jL --, c /ictr/o 14e •, //<- i VA Z 2`103 CONTACT PERSON (if different from above) Name ai. s criap C�Z�� �) Phone ( ) - Day Phone ( ) - Address LOCATION: Pwrji I Z. A cr\-T.M. ZCs y 1,- Jr%fe.rSe_cit04,1 o r roes 644 c (0 74 PLEASE PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION OF YOUR REQUEST ON THE BACK OF THIS SHEET. OFFICE USE ONLY TAX MAP c .7 , PARCEL a ; TM , P ; TM , P 6,4130 ZONED: r1 ORDINANCE SECTION: Board of Zoning Appeals Date: /2 /'4q5 0) Special Permit 5P-iy-a X) Variance 6/R-��-� Proffers BZA ACTION: 2) VA-94-17 . Daniel Shifflett (owner) /Joe Adlesic (applicant) . Located along Moormans River on S side Rt 614 0 . 1 mi E of inters with Rt 674 . TM21/P12A, zoned Rural Areas with Scenic Stream Overlay. Seeks variance to Sect. 30 . 5 . 5 . 2 (d) (6) to waive a, b and e. This is a request in conjunction with special permits, to construct a river crossing to serve a proposed house. Variance to the finding of replacement of an existing crossing for an existing house . \qlr\ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: M/ 5 reglc�s7 eelcA-745 fo -��¢ cc/9P/, J,oh ab -„ -/-ted �/05 ' h /1c//ems"C for a s ,e,c,'a/ per r 1 . P ° �.YC S 5/n G c2 S C� � G �S t'P Cz-i-1") (,5 Q.C��c t-t s.3U- 5-- ,�- 2 -(1• �) • /-r t9 O �i�1C i q 01e--Ierr,-, ,, n �{ Oi', b� he Zv,-, i -, Ac( mh ,` S�rcA pr .S,c4rS 7ha.-J- q l i C n r, d, •4,n v,5 a f C5 ec�I c)}7 .3 o..5 ,' -5- 2-cj (.o r, oc r 5 ] � e rv,e� Po i- -t h e_ Spec.,aI )9e.+ 4- c Ial fi r e-- l-5 -fov- cy p ro Ve I bJ +fie F O c -d o e,-v r c st 3e. -the. pec,ck.I —p- JUSTIFICATION SHALL BE BASED ON THESE THREE (3) CRITERIA: 1) That the strict application of this ordinance would produce undue hardship. / / r A-e ( .c3/re of//��L( A r /{/ proe f- L// y ;//0 9 LUZ.5�1 o i- i 5 Gl S/frig !�' J ✓1, side-Lice - L?eCcu.t Yio Q /1�rv,ckJ`> ✓e, iYlecZf-,,S n1 ye_A , cLt/al - cL eS✓ �`►e ro/9,2-r�-cf /,) /0 a S 5; b/e i /y J 7c7-, C a� /, c a�i c)ei o f vrc(,'nLzr, ce- Prop Ce 5 710 //, e. f5 cog e,- u�, fry✓ / f eri oGzri o cc",-, d Ci 2) That such hardship is not shared generally by other properties in the same zoning district and the same vicinity. /9cc --r 4/1 / ZOn,i-i ci l/i c/ ✓i 1 - x� Cro .>/ rlc f_ G re- 5 ; LQ .S ✓e - n e. kv1C1s-75 OF V CCe- 5S e Or /0 w c(J C-r b r /-d� e . 3) That the authorization of such variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and that the character of the district will not be changed by the granting of the variance./ I /_ / / / j e Gta ii-; i', Z.cull o i 1 j f ct 1�<i v I ccb,1 CL' Lc?G!C 1. c/ {'-U K0 kt- pT/_5 L1.b, J�cts,7`4Q,/ CC e.Ii v✓��c� 1L 7/- C� �( r t f ci CQ--7 7' /)!"o I�C y y o(�'•/le 4'-5 a 6 )!'i t- 1 / •t: e fs prc-s.5 ed /-, ci o by'e c /, c, ;, -/o //�,e-. /;'.r`5 � c:l- 4/5n) re 5(`/UCe r,�1a l r6 cx prrat^ �►�, tf Lc.5e CA-)/ tI �G„•.5 d,:7 f--icL, qr]d 71-/1 Sfax 4Ppcir/1.1e".-,,t O vcv4;r/-, a -,d 2e-crec. 4oi- he&S Sfct+e-c1 �h0.-/ c cro55i pict o 1-y pe «1o (AIc v,04- f/corvY,ct.i5 P. ve..+-15 d-ks a`,) SC -, C. r Ve2-. The application may be deferred by the staff or the Board of Zoning Appeals, if sufficient information necessary to this review has not be submitted by the deadline. I hereby certify that the information provided on this application and accompanying information is accurate, true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. /J / S /, 1503 Signature � ' Date Receipt# Date Cr z co t,tuu_j C o r 4 i ►► c1) p -Y v,, a p p!, Ccc Ji o f7 C CUN ✓1 61 ebi e�. Q I f J/ 2 r 2 IL( r'e, e4-) 1-5 01 Coe C' -; o Y1 3 0_ .5 - )-. 2 . C� .(ol GL ✓cL :ccin 3 r e c( IA-eS- Q q r ck4-14-1 r 9 r � /, e � �-��:►�, Coed: -/'.oh5 a) hi ate, d e. of (iec_1;can 3a. 5-5- 2 .d . 1 Attachment "C" 1988 Plat of Property _ •'.-f THIS IS 10 ctllnrr 111Ar UN /'JN,' ,,.T, /y.'7.01 , I t.Ullv11'LU Mt ►NUYLNII b4IO*IN ON • 11115 PLAT AIM 11IAI 111t 11111 LIMAS NW WALtS 01 lilt Utioi(.Ult.', AIII. LIIUWII I LHLUN, r '� I I , A2 i i/t%C J '°vl • r/,�i.yt-j ref .79 1 /ri CL. iN< J r,v,1 •.,N U\ 1,1j ON if 4C/1 , •,',.... : , • O 1./4, ,I r / I fit) r - - LI{r r , `� L-or � ; ///5 u <u. CJ 4C, s ' l', ,'' Y tt r �i� i' G 11 , e h 4 �? OF 11 ,p) , i N • 1 It) 5 / ,�' ``cl J Q t kk P f/ b. I� Q � N (I L. ail'/V A v,, j h p f� J nw/ • k1 W � 3W7/ ,'/ vo1 kk 0� ,�� tv • � V � J ' h ��,.I •V•♦,. Il/ I' ,)r 11;�1'�lit li. 1113Y 41Lti1::`. • ; r u I +yam Oyl v / 1"1 ul' • i 't ,54.,/4-/%/e•V' U. nuuut:Y Ilurf'MAN & AUUOCIA1Ii5, LIU, /\/-/v'' 4.4 /pad LIVII HP dill I NIP 1 I NIU ',l IIIV1 ON; . I Alll) Pi AIil1111(1 ott/ sv IM P d V/NHS/1 'A 1/100.2 9?7 'NP L'7 t,' ,we 1, - - - - - Agile ,,' rbI A.I 'O7 17: .1.0.1N11 NO NMONA AN I./ I/ 7. P7a/Yd .s'0 /V0/.4a/Od V 1/ N,/NM I-V 2P )' 4' ..0 NOLI) ./ fr vIv/.v ' x 7.»a'dd ON M 0,1, 1 a 6'7a/ \ )t7..R1Yby.at o7OP 90 S9Q•fr O O \ ,Nw,'rY.7 ONO,d/wsywM+0 APvo r.?OtWl r S/7N>>A✓ A w7 \ M',00,4 a' ;VW 'Y a/ 7C�L�16/ dOlY/dd I, I/ a'Na' ~� ,I.nq„2P0 GMV Q1 OJd106'!O a./l7 '/•Y �o �r 0,2 Av../ 6o'j'tT\ 2JW1►V .r10M1tt7N, 9nv1C .X,. ZR7a'r./ 3.0t./0.A•n 't. ,M,, �'� /%Of.tI.AD11 x z�Iva'w.JJ O70S1 1 ..1►p .t0/W'. ONP /Nl1Y.•rvMo .iN1w �'�; �`, ��.�6/ , y %• / $.'.D)',./MI./ V. W..A» 'd do 1 .,,/nr i .�.i1'*6/ rya✓ ✓ ✓.1D ./•6' W? fr' 3i41' • f if Ob.I1 NS I sv 11 4 c, ; ua (7o1,•►ow),, % a / y 7.9>a'No/ i ow [`/;/• ri 4I`': ,\ ); /...a,rl.,MN ./'k 7.P2 'Nd oI • J/voz o007..s/ ' O/)N do pi IAA/7 -... ,' o ,�( A►' FA 0 'w ISO d/ d b9W 76'lal .w3+'V 6' ,'^+,. .X:7�7014? ,'N 'i O �[�f 4/ jMYN 77/M A'.7/NM 'old 1.3t9Nt1 'WI/ .9.90.C.r.ZPA /N.21`,!'I:O`/1' 2.3t�r '. P'3d" ' ./•r /.N 7�Ja'd� k," ..u/ 7 31'►n1� /<D pi.�, vW 1G t'► �\n/.�P,v 77v1b,ys PD a! SW/,' Now/ c1.`g•+1�41% / — ..9... .wwoa0 stn'//voz IA'r j ny l� %,' 1 'b'2/ •7-JYN0/ �C1/1'/70J .17W1./�071,' 3/11_O e/ Now ewe") i% O 0300_PO r.or /vo/19�9J1 QI ti/Yow'N0,7 15Y14/ s 'v Fi.9 b'.Pa'b'N/b,74.' 0007.d _PAY N/ A1///r1.76' ,4 J 7vr0/0 0 11 k CL! l/ ./•I; 7�.7�b'd / -WO No/1a'1c11 6' 7N/�P ANY SDP /lrty/t2PS N/ O,w/71�0 /t r V •aWd C sloy3N3a'/7etp i .9/41 C!1 rpnn 80 ',de. 7.DTY6 ed '.1.1oN r/ owe f,/v3xJ tl J/ncY�r d r s'� /Dr•J46 '9O / l p Pi 76'av's V Kiwi?'vs, / P/Mi+'o?s d0 9i/b'/V _Wed /W a/' ONdr1J) /C1d'Jd424/ ' ' Wale OSAO?'dSb//bi3 • �.'', �'� -�•, '�, ge-14 r r D? ' /,,_ w;I,NNOJ r<�/ ; n .. /7D/1d a'b�^lO,V ticyrl r I ^: S��1rn x1 ^. 11 ' 91 - • .f 4 .,7 7/9 h,.7nJ1 Pb'/✓�Kl 3S11.04,/al op01 £1N/14A'N A D 06PL_/ ..'O A v0 or,6:2 JI'7e• S'xi/wv N000,-. 'd ' a'JAL ONN DNI'7..941,Y144, 9N//wvny SYNhlvl t.WJ 9l./3?'Q!•il• oJPO. 7MON,YJ6' 3A/1.7/,15.1'10iV 57kAJ1L1 A7A.4, SOSL1l3Yb✓µltlb•Y,/AV W/ etZe N4?w P DYb' AK4f _1/0-01-4,Z .Nv/ 9N/0D.PPo.' _h'1 DNA' 11PC7 l/Kl/I J.2..A.V-1 NA J1.7N&14+1le,0 9N/No1 A..1M70V 3h '. '976'31Y1 of 'J/M c'1 '0'/N/9e'''!,T0,016/1 Jl G+'i 'O3• L,/"Xis/A4'''P?'-? N o?lrvl r.�+o/1rr7no_Pe.JM ONv7 PAX '3-ION .P 7 yvs1.11,9076'do A1/vn 0 J aro/c awzi nn o/"v0 r /r 4, 4,---"'" -e....=V r07/,/•42.1, .1 7'/IN.za'b' 39a37/MON�,(h' r01rtPO 3/rI c"/.1 . ?'Y4l ONr,,PDXI �YN Jb'7o' iv Au az 03Y/id/V ,iNN3/✓-91N1f1 770' ;<7/1'b 70'J/lO L1 rr 7.,P5 O.?A-'? .JDa 1N3/✓1:,7�A� 7b'/1N31Qa', ?'n1/7.7' al 10,v-' 7�.CUr'�'1d'77JJN ,<Nb' 'S'P C/ ai/ON0' Pl3/J'dGDJ A.A10'M' OJv% /t GM7 3KL' ONi'10Pa d OJ b' S'/ l/N1 Al 9Y/P 9[7 3,'C!,4 J'W.9JNb'Ob17JJY N/ ONNJN3.0$4, .',£.RY.-v' W/,W 4'n' . Attachment "D„ i ,3 1990 (Current) Deed and Plat of Property .3J ??II/��V w U. THIS DEED made this 13th day of September, 1990, -: ' by and between BRONIUS SAKALAS and BARBARA A. SAKALAS, ` husband and wife, parties of the first part, hereinafter d. referred to as the Grantors, and DANIEL D. SHIFFLETT, homme sole, party of the second part, hereinafter referred to as the Grantee, whose address is P. 0. Box 642, Crozet, Virginia, 22932; WITNESSET H: That for and in consideration of the sum of Eight Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($8,000.00) , cash in hand paid, , the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties of ` { the first part do hereby GRANT, BARGAIN, SELL and CONVEY with GENERAL WARRANTY and ENGLISH COVENANTS OF TITLE unto the said Daniel D. Shifflett as his sole and separate ___ equitable estate, free from the control z 'd marital rights -----� of any present or future wife, and free from any dower x ,______: rights or inchoate dower rights of any present or future ,s. wife of the said Grantee, all of which are hereby expressly i. excluded, and with the full and complete authority in the _. said Grantee to alien, convey, encumber and otherwise deal • with and dispose of the same without necessity of joinder by or with any present or future wife of the said Grantee, all that certain tract or parcel of land .ituated in the. White Hall Magisterial District of Albemarle County , __ _. Virginia, on the Moo..wan's River, containing 6.43 acres, more or less, knon as Tax Map 26, Parcel 12A, partially " shown on plat by B. Aubrey Huffman & Associates, Ltd. , dated August 15, 1990, entitled, "Plat Showing Parcel X, being a portion of Parcel A-1 which is a portion of Parcel 14M , as shown on Sheet 26, County Tax Maps, Albemarle County, Virginia", attached hereto and recorded herewith, which 6.43 acres is comprised of Lot B, containing 6.00, as shown on plat by Frank A. Gregg, C.L.S. , dated June, 1972, of record in the said Clerk's Office in Deed Book 508, Page 30, and comprised of Parcel X, .,ontaining 0.43 acre, as shown on the said plat attached hereto. The said June, ti- 1972, plat incorrectly cited the acreage of Lot B as 8. 3 acres. The correct acreage of Lot B is 6.00 acres, as is shown on plat of B. Aubrey Huffman and Associates, Ltd. , .. dated May 18, 1988, a copy of which is attached hereto and recorded as a part hereof. The property conveyed hereby is a portion of the same property conveyed to Bronius Sakalas and Barbara A. Sakalas, husband and wife, by deed dated May 9 , 1988 ,. from Donald W. Foster and Deborah C. Foster, husband and wife, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virginia, in Deed Book 992, Page 581. This conveyance is made subject to all easements, conditions, restrictions, and reservations contained in e duly recorded deeds, plats and other recorded instruments, if any, constituting constructive notice in the chain of 1 hereb title to the property hereby conveyed which have not t expired by a limitation of time contained therein or have not otherwise become ineffective. r WITNESS the following signatures and seals. /7"o/4-1,-.4 ee 44-SEAL) Broniuss Sakala .1A,�1"y/ (SEAL) _arbara A. Sakalas • STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF Albemarle, to-wit: mom • foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ K day of October, 1990 by Bronius Sakalas and Barbara A. Sakalas. • Attachmen Report & A,rrroval Letter for VA-87-02 Donald Foster Stream ST n FF REPORT - VA-87-02 Crossing OWNER: Donald W. Foster TAX MAP/PARCEL: 16/12A ZONING: RA (Rural Areas) ACREAGE: 8. 3 Acres LOCATION: South side of Rt 614, + .1 miles southeast of its intersection with Rt 674 The applicant seeks a variance from Section 30.5. 5 . 2 d(6b) of the Albemarl County Zoning Ordinance. This section , pertaining to Scenic Area-Overlay District uses, states: "30.5. 5 Permitted uses by Right and Special Permit 30.5. 5 . 2 (d) The following uses by Special Use Permit only; 6. Bridges , causeways and. other similar structures designed for pedestrian and/or vehicular access; provided that the Board of Supervisors shall find, by clear and convincing evidence in addition to the findings required by Section 31. 2 .4 . 1 , that : (a) such bridge on other structure is to be located at the site of an existing bridge , ford or other stream crossing; (b) such existing crossing is regularly used, and such bridge or other structure is to be used, as to the sole means of access to one or more existing, lawfully occupied dwellings; . . . . The applicant proposes to construct a bridge across the Moorman River at the site of an existing ford. At present , there is not an existing, occupied dwelling located on the property. Only the chimney remains from the old dwelling which was originally served by the ford. The applicant seeks a variance enabling the construction of a bridge to serve a property where a occupied dwelling does not presently exist . The actual construction of the bridge will be contingent upon approval of Special Use Permit #86-95 . RECOMMENDATION The applicRnt ' s request should be approved contingent on the approval of the SP #86-95. 'Page 9 Minutes of Albemarle County Board of Ap eal � � /�' � February 11 , 1987 Li-. itVg 1 . 1 wanted to build a bridge above the river ' He stated that it would Se tz- t. 14. ,42-ad ?)/," , be subject to approval by the state . i� ,f„ n ✓�� ed Mr . Payne stated that this was located(( in a Scenic River Over- lay, and that the applicant needed the variance approval in order l to be able to apply to the Board of Supervisors for a special use PP Y P P permit . He stated that the gpecial use permit could not be .t., 4 i issued because there was not an existing house on the property . cirii, r The Chairman invited public comment . There being no further public comment , the matter was placed before the Board . i) Mr . Van Fossen made a motion that the variance be granted . He stated that the hardship was that the applicant could not $ i , adequately use his property . He made the variance approval contin- gent on the special use permit approval . Mr . Roberson seconded the motion , and the role was called . N r, Mrs . Huckle - Aye Mr . Roberson - Aye i Van Fossen - Aye Mrr .. Kennedy - Aye l 1 ' i, I: The next application before the Board was VA-87-3 , Hydraulic Professional Building Partnership . �`0 Mr . Evans read the staff report . VA-87-3 . Hydraulic Professional Building Partnerhsip , pro- perty known as Tax Map 61 , Parcel 27A, located at 2774 Hydraulic Road , zoned CO . The applicant seeks a variance ,� from Section 21 . 7 . 1 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance to reduce the setback for a freestanding business sign from thirty (30) feet to nine (9) feet . (See the attached copy Q� of the staff report . ) _ :5 ,'. . en160 FeAre X /4( . --- // G7 ‘/(Z'e'e%D ---- .,AY- 6 /Pt— ")A,.(__ i li/:/ /t- '0 -74-rN490 -vs( F ALBEMq Goy 7 F Acy `<4. ? isir • DEPARTMENT OF ZONING 401 MCINTIRE ROAD CHARLOTTESVILLE. VA. 22901-4596 (804) 296-5875 February 19 , 1987 Mr . & Mrs . Donald W. Foster 2885 Earlysville Road Earlysville , VA 22936 RE: Board of Zoning Appeals Action VA-87-2 , Tax Map 26 , Parcel 12A Dear Mr . & Mrs . Foster : This letter is to inform you that on February 17 , 1987 , during the regular meeting of the Albemarle County Board of Zoning Appeals , your application for VA-87-2 was approved subject to the approval of SP-86-95 . This variance approval allows relief from Section 30 . 5 . 5 . 2 d (6b) of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance to allow a bridge to be constructed over the Moormans River . If you have any questions , please contact our office . Sincerely, ��` li iwae It/. Aoarte44 Charles W. Burgess Zoning Administrator CWB/st cc : VA-87-2 Planning Department SP-86-95 a. R_ 4 ii i 1 % / ZONE A Cem ill I, .ro` Wr ` / iI Q ,�` _-Il-,ice�--____-- - - / \ I / s / _./ `I :4`. i ` . ' ZONE C \\ \ �/� �4 2 c--- I \ \\\ -.--_ 1 ��//ZONE A/,- : s. \® I \ / / ` \ •\•� /-- 1` \ • E A • / I: % '•Cem DAM ,� a r \ / \ � / / \ C�--/ ZONE C e,�• / Hollow ZONE A °� '�• YsananGQ . A\ • Camp toW ® t • �Y!%- r Hollow '; , // . .. Cem '" �� r � 1-- I ZONE C Jin l o 07, B —> I � / / / / ! L lV L -- t; Attachment 3 FEMA Map r M . - a 0 d rp • . woo0 'OCCk1r1G) 4 i ' i _... ._.....- .-i ' , . ' ,, �" CbNCiIEl [ -- — - --- -- ^ JrS•-(0Q1 —_ _` _ _ �c0NCfZ1-1 L . I. . . .. t 1 .., , • . • . . (Fooi e)F� \ 12-,51 : ,I ' .(Foo kr) , :SolL ' lk\ ' I . 5 1 L !a! RIvE'� BED , MOOkM . , i Attachment 7 1 Sketch of Proposed Development , ,( Attachment "H" State & Federal Agency Review Joint Permit Application Contacts (State and Federal): 1. Virginia Marine Resources Commission, Newport News, VA (804) 247-2200 Chris Frye 2. Department of Environmental Quality, Richmond, VA (804) 527-5093 Jean Gregory 3. State Game and Inland Fisheries Agency, Charlottesville, VA (804) 296-4731 John Kaufman 4. U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Lynchburg, VA (804) 263-8247 Nora Is1ey (No objection or opposition has been expressed by any of the contacts.) As regards other provisions of state and/or federal law Recommended Conditions of Approval: that appropriate state and/or federal permits will be required prior to construction. 1. Engineering approval of final bridge design and computatio ns; Staff has also reviewed this request for compliance with the provisions of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance 2. Virginia Department of Transportation approval of entrance (Attachment D). Staff opinion is that this request will not be location; of any detriment to adjacent property and that the request will not change the character of the district. The intent of the 3. Proof of compliance with applicable Federal and State Zoning Ordinance states in part "To provide for adequate light, requirements governing activities within streambed, wetland, air, convenience of access and safety from fire, flood and other and floodplain areas; dangers" (1.4.1) .' This site has similar environmental consideration as other properties in the area some of which have 4. Department of Engineering approval of hydrologic and been granted special use permits for crossings. The site under hydraulic computations and analysis. The bridge must be review has no access for motor vehicles. Currently no use of the designed so as to produce no net increase of the 100 year property which relies on vehicular access (i.e. - residential, flood elevation; forestry, etc) can be reasonably expected to be established. In review of this request, the Planning Commission 6 Board of 5. The bridge must be designed so as to safely support the Supervisors should consider if existing zoning provides for any weight of firefighting equipment or clearly posted as to the reasonable use of the land without approval of a stream crossing. maximum capacity; SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: 6. Water Resource manager approval of a Water Quality Impact Staff opinion, based on the comments from the state scenic river Assessment in compliance with the Water Resources Protection committee, is that the proposed bridge will have minimal impact Areas Ordinance; on the scenic aspects of the Moormans River. In addition the design of the bridge should have minimal negative impact on the 7. Bridge construction of non-toxic materials only; recreational use of the river. The provisions of Section 30.5.5.2(d)6 establish criteria for the review of developments within the SS. That Section requires the Board of Supervisors to 8. Clearing shall be limited to that necessary for the make certain findings by clear and convincing evidence that the construction of the bridge, and access road. request in is compliance with the SS and Section 31.2.4.1. 9. The bridge shall have a wood or stone facade and wood rails. This request does not meet all of the provisions of Section The support columns shall have a wood or stone facade. 30.5.5.2(d)6. This is due to the fact that the site is currently vacant and no stream crossing exists. The ordinance requires 10: Any future subdivision of the property shall utilize the that the Board find that access currently exists in order to bridge and no new crossings shall be permitted to serve the approve a crossing. Staff opinion is that the request is site. reasonable for the provision of access to the site. No alternative means of vehicular access exists which could provide 11. County Engineer of bridge modification consistent with for reasonable use of the site. Staff opinion is that the Section 6.2.1-194.2 of the Code of Virginia, if necessary. provision of the SS district, the Flood Hazard District and the conditions recommended by staff will adequately protect the public health, safety and general welfare and that the special use permit is approvable. Staff has found that the request is ATTACHMENTS: A n consistent with the provisions of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning n , J-''�'. Ordinance, and therefore, recommends approval subject to A - Location Map Y Y�.�" conditions. B - Tax Map C - Applicant information \� //--� ' D - Sections 31.2.4.1 6 30.5.52(d)6 ►\ C�(./A/i 444vv106 4_"_ E - Engineering Department Comments vk" Lek 5 6 2 IS aE. "A^AR'k- IN I,N N6140, C uuLss Attachment "I" ',\ z . Recommended Conditions for 'l 'Is rep s.1 Special Permit Approval 3 of- ,) t J ,a� via,�?d• vtoj- ,),Q,ui v-L..,,ftuabG Attachment "J" At 'lmlent E Comments from County Engineering Department L O U N fY OF ALBEMARLE Alt:1 LQF, jRG1�1P MEMORANDUM , Fs TO: Bill Fritz - Senior Planner FROM: Don Franco - Civil Engineer III DATE: 28 September 1994 RE: Joseph Adlesic Stream Crossing, Moorman's River (SP 94-027) The Department of Engineering has reviewed the referenced request for a special use permit (received 9/7/94). The special use permit is required in order to construct a single span bridge across the Moorman's River to provide access to the property (TMP 26-12A). Based on the supporting information prepared by the applicant and several field visits to the site, the Department of Engineering recommends issuance of the special use permit subject to the below listed conditions: 1. Engineering approval of final bridge design plans and computations. Because the driveway access onto SR 614 is within the 100 year floodplain, the bridge will not need to be designed to pass the 100 year storm. Instead the structure shall be designed to the same hydrologic standard as the adjacent section of SR 614 and to be structurally stable during the 100 year storm. 2. VDOT approval of the entrance location and right-of-way improvements. 3. Proof of compliance with applicable Federal and State requirements governing activities within streambed, wetland, and floodplain areas. 4. Department of Engineering approval of hydrologic and hydraulic computations and analysis. The bridge must be designed so as to produce no net increase of the 100 year flood elevation. 5. The bridge must be designed so as to safely support the weight of firefighting equipment or clearly posted as to the maximum capacity. 6. Water Resources Manager approval of a Water Quality Impact Assessment in compliance with the Water Resources Protection Areas Ordinance. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions regarding these comments or require additional information. ACF/ Copy: Jack Kelsey SP 94-027 sp9427_a.ftz Attac""",nt "K" Com] is from Scenic River Advisory Committee MOORMANS SCENIC RIVER ADVISORY COMMITTEE Recommendation on SP-94-27, Petition to bridge the Moormans River The Committee met on September 19,1994 to discuss Joseph R. Adlesic's application to bridge the Moormans River and to develop recommendations to the Department of Conservation and Recreation on that application. The Committee unanimously voted to send forward the following recommendations: The Committee recommends approval of SP-94-27 with the following conditions: 1. That natural materials be used for railings and facades of abutments in order to minimize the visual intrusion of the structure from the river. The suggested material for raiiings was wood and for abutments was stone facing or aggregate. 2. That paint containing lead not be used, so as to eliminate the danger of lead entering the stream. 3. That no introduction of invasive or non-native species be made in the re-seeding of the disturbed ground area. 4. That a 50 foot buffer of natural vegetation be maintained with only minimal distrubance necessary for maintaining a view or path. Such a buffer will not only lessen the visual impact from the river but be a benefit to maintenance to the river's superior water quality in times of high water. The following considerations figured in the Committee's deliberations and the members wish to record them here in order to inform any future deliberations on crossings of the Moormans. 1. Granting a crossing in this location does not alter the historical use and access of the parcel. The parcel is a parent and not a derivative parcel unsubdivided since before the turn of the century. Remnan►s of an old foot bridge to this parcel exist. 2. Topography makes other access to the parcel impossible. 3. The committee would like the design of the bridge to be reviewed for sensitivity to the Scenic River. Attachment "L" _ Zoning Administrator's Memo of October 27, 1994, Re: Variance COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE �"" a lit ��-�i CEt\ 6 1 ) . u 1 4 Planning MEMORANDUM TO: V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning and Community Development re FROM: Amelia G. McCulley, Zoning Administrator f`�DATE: October 27 , 1994 RE: S.P. 94-27 Joseph Adlesic Stream Crossing This is an official determination in response to the questions which arose at the Planning Commission meeting on this application. The issue at hand is whether this stream crossing may be approved if the Board is unable to make positive findings for all of the conditions for issuance of a special permit for crossing a scenic stream (Section 30 . 5. 5 . 2 .d. 6) . It is my opinion that the Ordinance requires that there are positive findings for each condition. If any or several findings can not be positively made, absent a variance granted by the Board of Zoning Appeals, the application would not meet the requirements for approval . The language of this section lists crossings by special permit and explicitly states "provided that the board of supervisors shall find, by clear and convincing evidence, in addition to the findings required by section 31 . 2 . 4 . 1, that" and lists a through g. The fact that these findings are inclusive is evidenced by the use of semicolons at each condition and by the conjunctive word "and" just previous to the final condition in the list. This subsection of the Scenic Areas Overlay District was amended to include this list of findings on January 19 , 1983 . This zoning text amendment was a result from a request to the Zoning Administrator by Dr . and Mrs . W. D. Buxton, for improving an existing ford to allow access to their residence during high water. The staff report notes the following: As staff recalls, a major concern of the Scenic Rivers Committee in drafting the zoning provisions was encroachment of barriers to canoe and other vessel passage. To this end, uses permitted by right were intentionally limited. In view of this background, it may be appropriate to include language in the amendment which would require design to V. Wayne Cilimberg October 27, 1994 Page Two S.P. 94-27 Adlesic Stream Crossing permit passage where practical, as was done in the case of the 'hydroelectric power generation' amendments earlier this year . . . I have reviewed the State Code provisions for variance by the Board of Zoning Appeals, and am of the opinion that the Board has the authority to review a request under this section. If you have any further questions, please let me know. Any person aggrieved by this decision shall have thirty days from this date in which to appeal this decision to the Board of Zoning Appeals, in accordance with Section 15 . 1-496 . 1 of the Code of Virginia or this decision shall be final and unappealable. tj�n( 9 Q 2 Wc@ S I l ):0It1t1 y- ^ '-2j� V.�+ ' •titi-re' '` THIS DEED, made this 9th day of May, 1988, by and between DONALD W. FOSTER and DEBORAH C. FOSTER, husband and wife, parties of the first part, and BRONIUS SAKALAS and B_ARBARA A. SAKALAS, ', husband and wife, parties of the second part, whose address is Rc..,TE 2 , 'oX S}-y4 , 0eo ,a-r , Vi2&i,vi A 22.e 2 W I T N E S S E T H That for and in consideration of the sum of uNE HUNDRED THIRTY FIVE THOUSAND AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($135,000.00) , cas;i in 'w . ,;e4i/. hand paid, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties „, '�r.; of the first part do hereby GRANT, BARGAIN, SELL and CONVEY with GENERAL WARRANTY and ENGLISH COVENANTS OF TITLE unto the parties ' of the second part as tenants by the entirety with full rights of survivorship as at common law, and not as tenants in common, all that certain lot or parcel of land with improvements thereon 4 * ' and appurtenances thereto belonging in Albemarle County, Vir- a ginia. more particularly described as follows: - 1 Parcel No. 1: That certain tract of land situated in r the White Hall Magisterial District of Albemarle County, Virginia, on the Moorman's River, containing 8.3 acres, more or less, shown as Lot B on a plat made by Frank A. Gregg, fA • C.L.B., dated June, 1972, of record in the Clerk's Office of =a the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virginia, in Deed r Book 508, at page 30, being the same property in all respects conveyed to the parties of the first part by deed 14 of Orbin F. Carter and Adeline R. Carter, husband and wife, dated December 3, 1986, of record in the said Clerk's Office , in Deed Book 912, at page 284. �1. Parcel No. 2: Those two certain tracts of land located 6 on State Route 674 and State Route 614, in Albemarle County, •i Virginia, more particularly described as Parcel A containing 10.9671 acres, and Parcel A-1 containing 1.5594 acres on a y plat of B. Aubrey Huffman and Assocates, Ltd., dated A September 13, 1982, which plat is attached to a deed rj conveying the said property to Donald W. Foster by deed of ' ` Lacy Cole McAllister and Eloise D. McAllister, husband and wife, dated October 19, 1982 of record in the said Clerk's t; Office in Deed Book 754, at page 683. _ aa This conveyance is subject to all easements, restrictions, reservations and conditions contained in duly recorded deeds, w ,A, 1fOK 992 Pm:En5isi ti,_ , a._ plats and other instruments constituting constructive notice in ro •• the chain of title to the above-described property Y which have not � expired by a time limitation contained therein or otherwise have become ineffective. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: 0V-I_ �_(SEAL) �1 , Donald W. Foster (- (SEAL) Deborah C. F ter STATE OF VIRGINIA n CITY OF CHARLOTrESVILLE, to-wit: I, J• NIc,C�.wirv,4 , a Notary Public in and ne lofor theing ,c City and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that of instrument was acknowledged before me this \a day May, 1988, by DONALD W. FOSTER and DEBORAH C. FOSTER. My Commission Expires:____ _ • _ ,t; — — i ll �: r Tiii w airy ,13 Pb4 it IN ' CLERK'S OFFICE ICE OF THE CIIITIT CR AL : NTY Y l.lYii� : RECORD MIS �M� � K�AW ii1ISWED PREMED, AND WM Al ).CERTIFICATE • ro STATE T X • - 0. • _ (039) \ -, LOCAL1411:• (213) =V8 FIX "rim,-.T. s RAT 'IF8'lE. 9, ga.S8.1-502 ( ISY J. Z, a 111X131 TAX na wz.e '1X ( ) BY:4#044fir-111—"°222 --. ( ) IACAL TAX IUML $ �'J.�r./: 2 e s3 I . THIS IS 10 court'il1AI ON 7 ',..,- . t•.':,A I •.ttHN1(I) lilt Piloi•LIIII fSUDA•N 011 1 HIS PLAT AND 111AI 111( hill LINTS AND 11 Al t5 DI till 10 111,111t.. AM S11l1A14 11ll HLU/N f • I •?A N i �N:l li:c • P.l r�Y.c4•,, W„ \ .,-..., .79 r''' ,,,,,,.................................il,,,,,,,,..' ..,.,.. V 01 • b • t ' A •• ,e a(� •• t V,\•. .� / t� 1, t V t) •�.:.i, t 1 t1 �. • Y , , 1 ^, t r 1 V' '4 111 1jl /i\ , , 2• • ..O T (3 ' V v N. <o.n .?c. r • �,,'I �,, r 1 r 111 0 o . .. k, q 1-, c, - (/ P : &fl',//: ,I1 Z o q q u� .n / �' . . tll o vQU ' tu .) / k4 , W � , toa � ( AP/ y4V . 1 � p ii Z t a p `.i;i 1u ct ,,, . v ,./‘ .,.,1:LI/ 1, ,,, ty,,' \1 k 77/ •\ ,• : .• le tt )� `� / / ` • oN l� ' t '• ^y <. .,. moo '• 1 ,'/ , l, ~ t1 ' J V t,L 1 ' �'� W `.k p V .', ` . . , lU' �, ;,) . Jr'0" 1 • it/OTA.e Y P!/eL/G G •'•. • �• /'Y.,. Y CO 11A.tl/GV EWPI,CES • , • T`oZ y-7 I - .•••,.-... /•9�PROVEO FO/<, �r"s_ .•ZECO.e.AT/ON 1r 91./—y.t G/�: r AnpF s; ,• 1 I /.enfiE,ery U•TANO/N TJ 6 me yE NAl7e • tile ‘ / OF j�oN/US /BA48AQ,q A SAG9L4$ ` 09 992•S6/. 1,kk,1 ' - P/9.GCEC X; ci ' till tfvorCcr /a me p PAR. /2 A e�'7�7UieE/YE✓TtS __ J 'vG A fb.CTION OF ' �v G �AC s% • 'g4i/6 Az /J TO ,k nn�,/ Dc/174vE0/N tfecrION ao s .9N Y ♦ O 43��t `'/ AITI!//TY /N!]/E FL000 PLAN A.eEil a;• • .1er 400EO 7V ,!NO �' Co 43 ac t O e (vow tarmac MUST �'ONFO,Q/1 TO t.ECTION 30 3 Se= o/1E- / O/On/OF' W ' L OF Me A 9.COE/`.f. CLE COUNTY f•t-WeEL 2 A \ �S / 2��a 6 E ZON/NG O,P.,iNANCE. • et,' 4{' S%6 60 /eON F!//�S TO !�E o'er AT r7GG NEW j/� ,J roevEPS a tTuvE / /yy/. • ' i'4,'Z,!J2.• "�✓ l fJ,eCEG /9-/ A•/- Co/7/.:cAsE P/I.e c G 9'• / •y ,v.y2's9.00o"E • 44. Z(o' l4NJ, tSHEET 2Co, H!///c 1✓icC NA6E f-9' CEG,X \a 9 NEW TDTAC ARFA OF /Z 097 AC. • es/37' /e'9 /41 •-- ///-1/Tf OF Al!/O ..: i. . q n _i; DOE//ivEO ioo YEA. w - ;f s•. IC-� ;� /=coon ZONE '4 i o °r` .ti P/9.eCEC , ,v'JS .97-i✓ • A ' i/..S(o AC9t/ 4 /1"7- V I‘IN,..\ -/: • Al,eCEL A -• a • •`'i (vE,,•rota l J Y 67 we t 9r/S.3ta'i✓ ;V70.40 93 E - %9G 87 , :1 7 OF ,.A.ecEL. /1/y, /71/ST.eEMA//v o'4/0E/2 \ . ONE OWNE,�tSH/P AA/0 CANNOT OE ! `- x, lrito'49'9B W \-��''oO",, :-TT-•• tSOLO tS'E//l E'/9Te Z y. \P?S B9' r'E`N 7 .V.V.l9 aB"F , /"A.eCEC ':7' 3=•"•+6 4 PaG 70/OF P/9QCEc s.� a6o T. ' 2:o z� A-/, 'S Ta (ye AOOEO TO ANO OEcOro- \ ' �\ �/I,e /d A PAQT OF /".9e['EL /2 A, S Cc,-fAi y \ \\ L Q " `�<<�C STEW UNOE.e a,vE G1H/NE,BSN/P/9.v0 CAq/NOr \ O 8 7S4-Ca 5 OE %SOC O S EPA,eT-Ec Y \ .< • ` f'L/9T L$'HO IN//VG • y• - • • f0A.2 CEG X , B E/NG /9 /-'0.er/0N OF P/9/CC EG A-/ % i , ... n'eV/C# IS A PORT/ON OF eac'i9RCEG /4 M .} • i 4d kr/Y0 kVA 7 ON ISNEET 2 Co, COUNTY 7-/9X MAPS ;_: ‘$CACE•/:: 200' /9L a E/`fi9/e(E COUNTY/ (//RG/N/A AUG UST As; /??0 '41.f.` 4 " 9!/B . B. . REY H!/FF/�1.9N�'ASSOc/AYES, LTD. C/ i-/e. E/V G,,,,VEER//VG -/A/VO tf//RVEYi.Vr -/An/!, .o/�o.v�/i.t✓i 1991/92 REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL - COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA SHIFFLETT, DANIEL D Description Acreage C8.300,;- MAP NO 02600-00-00-012A0 P 0 BOX 642 L—B ,y3 CLASS NO 28 ZONING CODE RA CROZET, VA 22932 Mortgage Acct LAND USE NO PENDING DEED BOOK: 992 /581 DISTRICT 6 — 0H TAX RELIEF N NG 2293 2 PROPERTY NAME_ DIVISION RIGHTS Year Record of Ownership l Book Page Price B/P# REMARKS EX/SUPP# J Pta*: t. 430 Rc.. ccor� a�p-,1%{r\ ne.a S- i e I 1 (l .17 lc/Li p�/� I 5 f ) ' F R Sc.`(c\\as, Fbcnc1�J:a sA- "e`C\pdea I/ Q7 /'1 / O000' ,' ~ I Land ADDRESS OF PROPERTY RECENT SALES DATA Bldgs EXPLANATION FOR LAND ADJUSTMENTS ('�' e r DATE OF SALEAL SALES PRICE COMMENTS Topography(Explain) Total —I El'.. t /// d eben In Land % .`�� ..i r Bldgs / Total '7 O Q Appraisep,�_// ) Remarks —. Land Date /Oi _ O _2. � Appraiser I t Bldgs No of Dwelling Units 0 / .�*yO'`L Date /� �f�J Total 1 V4:A AC/La 95"I4o.Ji cr Pne,,U% _ Appraiser AcreageTOTAL Ad Square Footage ! Unit -• l 1991 Total 19"7ia Total 19 Total �Cl O '�S� �� `} '.G Price l• Appraisal AppraisalDate Appraisal TOPOGRAPHY ACCESS LAND USE INFORMATION Level State Rd a'/ Crops I High Private Rd Pasture Low Paved Livestock CLASSIFICATION NO.ACRES RATE ADJ Rolling Semi Imp Neglected Home Site Steep No Road Forest Home Site Wet St Rt - ed, MOBILE HOME INFORMATION Home Sde _Year Road Frontage I IMPROVEMENTS 0 Make Road Frontage I 1 Public Water 6.Well Road Frontage 2 Public Sewer 7 Gas Owner s 1 Name ' (i 3 Private Water 8.U G Utilities Computation i,//L, �L /5c I 3S' c, �O O 4 Private Sewer 9 Spring , /' t! "..�� /000 � 0 yVotC I 5 Septic I APPRAISERS REVIEW BOARD REVIEW Total Acreage Total Value Land v ( rf �-�� Total Value Buildinns Total Value Land&Bwidings I ,Z / , ,d 1993/94 REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA :;1l1 FL,E j! D, IEL Li Description Acreage 6.430 MAP NO 0 SGC-OC-O+?-G .ZA3 71 V BOX o,t! L-B CLASS NO 2B ZONING CODE RA �K.i' T VA Mortgage Acct LAND USE NO PENDING DEED BOOK: 1127/142. DISTRICT 6 - WH TAX RELIEF N-Ne L 9 9 3:3 PROPERTY NAME DIVISION RIGHTS fl Year Record of Ownership Book Page Price B/P# REMARKS 1 EX/SUPP# I Land ADDRESS OF PROPERTY :Siy ©� RECENT SALES DATA EXPLANATION FOR LAND ADJUSTMENTS t I Bldgs DATE OF$ALEE SALES PRICE COMMENTS Topography(Explain) Total S L C l ...II //// LE N 8006 1 I Land I - Bidgs T1 Total Appraiser /��„ Remarks. A. .mac:�•-•s y ,� Date'. ILai /�' SL. % f ' Appraiser 1 Bides No of Dwelling Units ill//// / Date a)I Total i Appraiser Acreage Square Footage Unit Depth Front Ft. TOTAL Adj. 1993 Total 19 Total 19 Total - Price Factor Rate Appraisal Appraisal Appraisal Date 1 TOPOGRAPHY ACCESS LAND USE INFORMATION Level State Rd - Crops High Private Rd Pasture Low Paved ----livestock CLASSIFICATION NO ACRES RATE ADJ. Rolling Semi Imp Neglected .-ie Ste Steep No Road Forest -.me Sate Wet St Rt# (f /ell MOBILE HOME INFORMATION me Site Year Size ad Frontage IMPROVEMENTS cad Frontage .Make 1 Public Water 6.Well ad Frontage 2 Public Sewer 7 Gas Owner's _��..�... ��,/' 2 -Name —/p�70 / / -'ze„,,, f 3 Private Water _8 U G Utilities Computation 4 Private Sewer 9 Spring --.7i _ 2 .> .. =0 - /Ge70 , t` 4/0r 5 Septic APPRAISERS REVIEW BOARD REVIEW r�_gge Lo .t} . t +) -. .,.;r Land .__s Bucd:ngs .-._. _�nd&Buildings r4y�- 1995/96 REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA .HIFFLETT, DANIEL D Description Acreage 5.430 MAP NO O26CO-0C—OO—012A0 P 0 30X 642 L B CLASS NO 2B ZONING CODE R A CROZET VA Mortgage Acct LAND USE NC PENDING DEED BOOK: 1127/141 DISTRICT 6 — 14H TAX RELIEF NANO 2293Z PROPERTY NAME DIVISION RIGHTS 0 Year Record of Ownership Book Page Price B/P# REMARKS EX/SUPP# 1.0 Land / V q On ADDRESS OF PROPERTY RECENT SALES DATA EXPLANATION FOR LAND ADJUSTMENTS Bldgs DATE OF S E S LES PRICE COMMENTS Top ography pography(Explain) Total / \C,4 ^ // lriO tia00 Land /�T Bldgs �+/ / rc•c v</ //_ 2. 2sac ; CO APpr is �w�/�y Rem s: / Total +��+/ `J r Land Date 7�, —%'� 1 Appraiser I/^ !/� ��/ 1 Bldgs No of Dwelling Units Date (� f{/ Total Appraiser / J Acreage ' Front Ft. TOTAL Add. 1995 Total ,1 19 Total 19 Total Date ��*� r � Slir-2 , Price Factor Rate Appraisal Appraisal Appraisal TOPOGRAPHY ACCESS LAND USE INFORMATION . Level State Rd `Crops High Private Rd. Pasture Low / ^Paved �/ Livestock CLASSIFICATION NO. ACRES RATE IMP. VAL. ADJ. Rolling Semi Imp. Neglected Home Site • Steep No Road Forest Home Site Wet St Rt.a C' MOBILE HOME INFORMATION Home Site Year Size Road Frontage IMPROVEMENTS Make Road Frontage 10-100 Public Water Well Road Frontage •-21 0 _ �'017 Public Sewer Gas Owner's ��� Name Ov7•g-'2) ) r4 C t/ Private Water U.G.Utilities Computation Private Sewer Spring Septic Paved Drive APPRAISERS REVIEW BOARD REVIEW Total Acreage LO • ry ` !'-2. ^ �f Total Value Land ' 0..." Total Value Buildings Total Value Land&Buildings //) 42 0- 19 90 TRANSFER FOR 19 9'/ LAND BOOK MAP NO. (000 /)0 OO O/Z./ -) AC. & DISC. G • V3O LOT .6 BL. SEC. SUED. DISTRICT L&J/-/ ZONE .eR `` MAXIMUM LOTS GRANTEE: f/, ,c1/C f 04/7;P / .� ADDRESS: / , x3 X G VZ. efojG /- z&. Z2 3z GRANTOR: �G /7 C% /Ct 5 s8c-D/7,C!5 . .1257‘r,'-L2- z. 4 DEED BOOK //Z 1 PAGE DESCRIPTION PLAT PAGE i y5/ REC. DATE /, / 'mod _Lr7cr-e4.S SURVIVORSHIP ,3 00 7-.�is APPRAISAL CARD NUMERICAL FILE 4• `-/3O .4'L- Frf1 v' 2/, -/ym PARTIAL /✓(am,) j if . 30 WHOLE CONSIDERATION REAL ESTATE LAND USE CLASS PENDING INACTIVE DEFERRED TAX NO. VALUE PER VALUES ACRE ACRE TOTAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISED LAND USE APPRAISED HOME SITE LAND ROAD FRONTAGE BLDG. 2- /S ' ,3cw TOTAL 7 19 Ir X TRANSFER FOR 19 /Y LAND BOOK • MAP NO. / '(,pr' - OO - Oo - o/Z .1D AC. & DISC. ,.F; 3C;U LOT BL. SEC. SUBD. DISTRICT (%x/ ZONE ;RANTEE: .Sc{/;mac �U /`�r/7,�� d llibcl�Q Q D' DRESS: /7 Z /So...i,-.5.7 = _ '-- g 1RANTOR: FosIL4 r- ��f) ?/� /A.) 7J�Aerza 4 G • DEED BOOK Z. PAGE 5k J DESCRIPTION PLAT PAGE MC. DATE I/ SURVIVORSHIP 1PPRAISAL CARD — — WUMERICAL FILE PARTIAL WHOLE CONSIDERATION zTri,6tS REAL ESTATE LAND USE CLASS PENDING INACTIVE DEFERRED TAX NO. VALUE PER ACRE ACRE TOTAL VALUES REAL ESTATE APPRAISED LAND USE APPRAISED 10ME SITE LAND ROAD FRONTAGE BLDG. TOTAL 19 ,p62 TRANSFER FOR 19 g,7 LAND BOOK MAP NO. BZ 6o0 -- Go -c'IO - 4/24v AC. & DISC. .3Do LOT ,6 BL. SEC. SUBD. DISTRICT tv,y ZONE GRANTEE: fn,s tier 01:,ne-1 161 LJ o X ere,.A C ADDRESS: 2 c?f• �G2r17 ,% /�set. D c/ fc• !" s u, //e 1/_ Zz93 tc GRANTOR: (!Q r-7`P r Dr-A i 4de_7,'„ e DEED BOOK / z PAGE L 8S/ DESCRIPTION PLAT PAGE REC. DATE k - S / SURVIVORSHIP APPRAISAL CARD �ey (31 NUMERICAL FILE PARTIAL WHOLE CONSIDERATION ,S SV C) REAL ESTATE LAND USE CLASS PENDING INACTIVE DEFERRED TAX NO. VALUE PER ACRE ACRE TOTAL VALUES REAL ESTATE APPRAISED LAND USE APPRAISED HOME SITE LAND ROAD FRONTAGE BLDG. TOTAL