Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA199500016 Application 1995-11-03 County of Albemarle Department of Zoning 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 (804) 296-5875 FAX (804) 972-4060 ± VA- 5 2 , DATE: //-,3 - FEE: 95. 00 # ., STAFF: gy ey VARIANCE APPLICATION OWNER (as currently listed in Real Estate) Name 1/(k/k�j I, ,r-/'(Gr -/ u S/_ Phone Address T ) �SGLA 5 �3-y7�U�� APPLICANT (if different from above) Name Phone ( ) - Address CONTACT PERSON (if different from above) Name Phone ( )Day Phone ( ) Address LOCATION: Ort f' 7/57 /, s Cvutk f- if- .� PLEASE PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION OF YOUR REQUEST ON THE BACK OF THIS SHEET. OFFICE USE ONLY TAX MAP/ rf , PARCEL,j b ; TM , P ; TM , P ZONED: RPt ORDINANCE SECTION: Board of Zoning Appeals Date: / /_ X Special Permit �]3 -o U ( 7 Variance L,)/A M-lia ( ) Proffers 4-SP-'73 / BZA ACTION: orre_yLe_ee LAYiA Co-Ad:Le/1 Lyt.o � (. / � ���✓mac, l�����- CL.ti..,\.,Q bo y L.01 ial w ?IV- 4-0 fs'c J5 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: `Vo/Lg' �/,t�- p� f- `,� X i1 1i , a e x , s�.. ©C .,7y 4, t r e- JUSTIFICATION SHALL BE BASED ON THESE THREE (3) CRITERIA: 1) That the strict application of this ordinance would produce undue hardship. 2) That such hardship is not shared generally by other properties in the same zoning district and the same vicinity. 3) That the authorization of such variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and that the character of the district will not be changed by the granting of the variance. The application may be deferred by the staff or the Board of Zoning Appeals, if sufficient information necessary to this review has not be submitted by the deadline. I hereby certify that the information provided on this application and accompanying information is accurate, true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature Date Receipt# Date 2) VA-95-16 Walker L. & Mary E. Rush (owners) . Property on S side of Rt 715, approx. 2 mi S of Rt 6 . TM127/P56, zoned Rural Areas. Variance to reduce the setback from Rt 715 from 75 to 53 ft for an addition to house, a variance of 22 ft. \qlr\ oeafz ' s Mr. -1 c.-e,Q.s a V a c e_ ,aX` 2. a 110 ) s- . . Qrpte /Lc- o(.e .t a-s..[ owti. 14A. Z 4 74 dx-a1, . -U , mac- 9C -a -Xt4- ° p 1f do /et:. ? -_ _ 5 a�u�v 3� .�J �z vL i :7 - r..f,Q) `^ .4 00( - )wt' rq c rO ' -v C60ro c?ay ' 1-10wL S'M c' ; -1':r 1 +or+ ')ssr o v' -7r.25.1. Scac+o- i M bC-;c-+011 1 ? gar-nrr i N o l-v) J l srn7 I V vJ �L (; tio2.1 '�`� c� or s : � ro�� -nw ��� srJ4,' /\ .cedatryncrif ' '�� ` / ripi 17'72,v 57 37-0}S `�'';'lr" �1' vl c'r �-T ' s'3-( u f ra-f,Cl Y Ai frp7r ' do1r r 71.-voc.40v (r,ttc,*sr 4' fra, p o' 0/. iSL ryelr"P Q rrry . r.o.ro-r r; £ZL 'tz Tf J 1 S-JV '"'Z d Z (";rvZ. 17 s l L z/ ; iron v L b22 .`on -}("'a„4s7 `7S»� ,3 4- ,w fry -7 1I w t : 14"g-17'0,74V rM� 1I - $4 �� _imp o ^0-4-0-cfec, A-ri4 gr 4L-K, cr-rei Ai'AA Ate. ccov•-•• 4"0-ra rei L. . __A/11A V.444,..i-p,C4.- t...3 tx-S ACte ?-A.L-SL -Vit. 0-,80 a 4% FAA-4- too ife•zts, JA/c4)..ce... zez c AAA-. rns 0.A.LI-A-; to z • 22-1993 11:00AM FROM PAYNE & HODOUS TO 9724060 P.06 Checklist for Variance Considerations 1. Did the applicant acquire the property in good faith, or was the restriction on use already apparent to a reasonable observer at the time the property was acquired? 2. What restriction is there on the use of the property? nivta- 3. Assuming that there is such a restriction, U ( a ) Is the restriction such that it unreasonably restricts the use of the property or approaches confiscation? No (b) Is the restriction on use directly related to some condition of the property, as opposed to the particular owners/occupants? j es (c) Is that condition of the property something which arises naturally from the property itself, or is it caused by something which is built on the property? 5trrvu.41,1,; a'- (d) Is the hardship unique to this particular property, or is it shared generally by other properties in the same zoning district and the same vicinity? sc,L, h case_ iricL441,1 4. If the variance is granted, will it ( a) cause substantial detriment to adjacent property? . o (b) change the nature and character of the district? u 5. Is the problem such that it would be practicable for the board of supervisors to amend the ordinance to take care of i�t?./ - POSS 6 b c.�2.0 -70 S S i a.,,t a L:14-tutees e -Itt van Gam- s. (J 6. Will the proposed variance be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of the ordinance? Ve6 7. Are there any conditions which are necessary to take care of any problems which might otherwise be caused by the variance, if granted? frva-viAt- G€4 /!ks /-4_ ,r ,l1 141_ '�'.f�-,4 4-e, ��i(.�/.l�ln / "`x- c � (J ck w lu f l� i,.t a,o ai I-It-o4 “Akkil.t. VA .