Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200600112 Application Major Amendment, Final Site Plan 2006-10-09 t+.A� Community Development Department, Planning& phi iP _\ County of Albemarle Community Development Division A',; 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902-4596 4 Planning Application 1 Voice (434)296-5823 Fax:(434)972-4012 PARCEL/ OWNER INFORMATION T M P 07800-00-00-015C2 Owner(s): BALLIF INVESTMENTS LLC Application# SDP200600112 PROPERTY INFORMATION Legal Description ACREAGE Magisterial Dist. Rivanna Land Use Primary Commercial-- Retail Current AFD Not in A/F District Current Zoning Primary Highway Commercial APPLICATION INFORMATION House # Street Name Apt/Suite City State Zip Street Address 170 SOUTH PANTOPS DR CHARLOTTESVILLE 22902- Entered By: Stephanie Mallory on 10/09/2006 Application Type Site Development Plans Project: Dominion Office Park-Phase 1 (Parking&Building Expansion) - Major Amendment 3,612.00 Received Date 10/09/2006 Received Date Final Total Fees $ 270.00 Submittal Date 10/09/2006 Submittal Date Final Total Paid $ 270.00 Closing File Date Revision Number Comments: Legal Ad SUB APPLICATION(s) Type Sub Application Date Comments Major Amendment 10/09/2006 APPLICANT/ CONTACT INFORMATION Primary Contact Name Yadira Amarante- DDR Phone# (434) 979-8121 Street Address 172 South Pantops Drive Fax# (434) 979-1681 City/State Charlottesville,VA Zip Code 22911-0000 E-mail yamarante@ddrva.com Cellular# ( ) - Owner/Applicant Name BALLIF INVESTMENTS LLC Phone # (434) 245-0894 Street Address 170 SOUTH PANTOPS DR Fax # ( ) - City/State CHARLOTTESVILLE VA Zip Code 22911- E-mail Cellular# ( ) - Signature of Contractor or Authorized Agent Date Application for Major & Minor Site Plan Amendments and All Reinstatements of Denied or Deferred Site Plans - ' Major Amendment(Subject to Planning Commission Review)=$270 0 Minor Amendment(alterations to parking,circulation, 17 folded copies of plan are required building size,location)=$95 8 folded copies of sketch plan are required ❑Reinstate Plan Review After 10 day Denial=$200 ❑Reinstate Plan After Site Review Denial or Suspension=$65 ❑Reinstate Plan Deferred by Applicant ❑To a specific date=$35 ❑Indefinitely=$75 17 folded copies o f plan are required Was a groundwater review conducted for the existing site plan? IQYES NO If YES:What is the average gallons of water used per day for the existing use(s) ? and What is the NEW average gallons of water used per day? If NO:What is the average gallons of water used per day for the all use(s) ? ❑ Tier 3 Groundwater Review=$400 plus$25 per dwelling unit (Required for all plans showing a use that uses less than 2,000 gallons of water per day average) ❑ Tier 4 Groundwater Review=$1,000 (Required for all plans showing a use that uses greater than 2,000gallons of water per day average) ❑Relief from conditions of approval from Planning Commission or landscape waiver by agent=$180 ❑Extension of approval prior to expiration of an approved plan=$45 ❑Rehearing of Site Development Plan b by the Planning Commission or Board of Supervisors=$190 ❑Appeal of Site Development Plan to the Board of Supervisors=$240 f,�� j� %3u; Id, r9 Project Name:�bVv\',Yl:QoYI 0 Ce JGZ-f I L , �r ti(`se I / i'�it i v15 Ex. i3;ari Tax map and parcel: -8- 15 2 Magisterial District: R.:va VI via Zoning: 1-1- Physical Street Address(if assigned). - O S. 'D(3 -•--2)4p S J)f•:Vrv. Location of property(landmarks,intersections,or other) Contact Person(Who should we call/write concerning this project?). y tr,O, 4 (Qn, r DDW4:VI:oft TeveIu. ,vtt'Y1*f,Sfce Address [1 2 S.�Q A s ve City CV 1(e State ✓A Zip 1 Q225 11 Q Daytime Phone(41) ei 19 g 12 I Fax#(L ) l 7 1• I�p j E-mail joi ram+e c,� �I�U,4•�ON,�� Owner of Record C� I . L l; .� —1-1�V (Yl 5- -er)4-5 , l Address o S. P ry...s )& Ve City `1 C 7 U;' �. State VA ZipZ2 Daytime Phone(434) 245•0 S I Fax#( ) E-mail ` 0� •a Applicant(Who is the Contact person representing?) G'jGZm(�P Q , d( �� /' t. t' Address Cit Stalsj r r -: Zip Daytime Phone( ) Fax#( ) E-mail FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SDP# =��iR. e� •fir ` Fee Amount$a-76,10 Date Paid l0-9 Of y who? So ui-}Q41 Receipt#/p 3 Ck# J�`rjgf 3 By 616�„( County of Albemarle Department of Community Development !/, 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 Voice: (434)296-5832 Fax: (434)972-4126 5/1/06 Page 1 of 2 Intended use or justification for request: • Re VYM ie EX; 4-m5, De.c IL. • GoYI` c1c4 0. 4 3 GsF l'dd: -h on In i-ES Flare -(ar (4‘4:.'Ce Spe p •G-D,n -k 0c- - a 12 - 5 Pa re pcv.)c'r\j to 4- -6) a CC ►4-, male -1-14 e ad J._;-I;orIzte ©. . cr cDf. .ce Owner/Applicant Must Read and Sign This site plan as submitted contains all of the information required by Section 32.5 (Preliminary Plan)or Section 32.6 (Final Plan)of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. I understand that plans which lack information required by said sections shall be deemed incomplete and shall be denied by the agent within ten(10)days of submittal as provided in Section 32.4.2.1 or Section 32 4.3 3 as the case may be For Final Plans Only- To the best of my knowledge,I have complied with Section 32.4.3.1 and obtamed tentative approvals for all applicable conditiofrom the appropriate agencies. 7..,/(f,t4ts 1" �� >o /l0 9 /o Signature of Owner, Contract Purchaser, Agent Date Print Name Daytime phone number of Signatory 5/1/06 Page 2 of 2 er s .��e�ov9 �ominion 172 South Pantops Drive 0o�e Charlottesville, VA 22911 Development 434.979.8121 (p) Resources, LLc 434.979.1681 (f) ?.%\\ DDRVA.com °/3. � .fie ers cts October 9, 2006 Community Development Department Division of Zoning and Current Development County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: Dominion Office Park, Phase 1, Major Site Plan Amendment Request for Critical Slopes Waiver To whom it may concern: This letter is to request a waiver from the requirements of Section 4.2 of the Zoning Ordinance The attached site plan shows that there are areas with 25% or greater slopes that will have to be disturbed as part of this road project. The total area of existing critical slopes on TMP 78-15C2 is 18,252 SF. The total area of critical slopes that will be disturbed for the parking lot expansion and associated stormwater management facilities is 1,624 (9 percent). Description of Parcel Area Total Critical Total Critical % of Critical Areas slopes on slopes slopes site disturbed disturbed TMP 78-15C2 47,436.84 SF 18,252 SF 1,624 SF 9% (1.089 acres) (0.42 acres) (0.03728acres) Below, each of the concerns of Zoning Ordinance section 18-4.2 is addressed: 1 "movement of soil and rock": We will provide an erosion and sediment control plan for controlling the movement of soil and rock involved with the construction proposed in the critical slopes. Page 1 of 2 2. 'excessive storm water run-off": We will provided information concerning how the stormwater runoff will be controlled by the drainage and stormwater management plan proposed for this project. 3. "siltation of natural and man-made bodies of water": Inspection and bonding by the County will ensure siltation control during construction. Proper stabilization and maintenance will ensure long term stability. 4. "loss of aesthetic resource": The existing critical slopes proposed for disturbance are delineated on the Open Space Plan Composite Map for Neighborhood 3 and are located within a Major or Locally Important Stream Valley — the Rivanna River. River and stream valleys are designated as important resources that are often associated with critical slopes. Although disturbance of these slopes is minimal it will be further mitigated by erosion control measures minimizing the chance of erosion on the downhill slopes approaching the flood plain and river. Also, a tree conservation measures and the applicant's contribution to The Greenway by means of a dedicated easement further protect this important aesthetic resource. 5. "septic effluent": No septic systems or drainfields are proposed in this project. This project will be served by the public sanitary sewer system. This site does not drain into a waterway that is a public drinking water supply for Albemarle County. The most southern portion of TMP 78-15C2 is shown within the 100- year flood plain area according to FEMA Map 51003CO287D, dated 04 February 2005. The reasons given above demonstrate that the grading of critical slopes on this project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and/or welfare of the public. Please call me if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, ,X,/,( 1;d Timothy Miller, P.E., P.L.S. Vice President Page 2 of 2