HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA199900001 Review Comments 1999-02-02 STAFF PERSON: Amelia McCulley
PUBLIC HEARING:February 2, 1999
STAFF REPORT VA-99-01
OWNER/APPLICANTS: Carlton & Nancy Luck
TAX/MAP/PARCEL: 27/43
ZONING: RA, Rural Areas with Scenic Stream Overlay (Moormans
River
ACREAGE: 3.25 acres
LOCATION: On the south side of Rt. 674 along the Moormans River
about 1 mile west of the intersection with Rts. 665 and 671
TECHNICAL REQUEST AND EXPLANATION: The applicants request relief from
Section 10.4 of the Zoning Ordinance to reduce the front yard setback in the Rural
Areas district. They request a reduction from 75 feet to 31 feet from Rt. 674, a variance
of 44 feet. This is to allow a deck to remain as it was built. The deck is 6 feet by 20 feet
(120 square feet). As part of a larger effort to improve this property received from Mr.
Luck's Father, the applicants built the deck without realizing that a permit was required.
The Lucks were made aware of this requirement from discussion they had with County
staff at a meeting. They promptly applied for the proper permit. When it was inspected,
the setback discrepancy was discovered.
RELEVANT HISTORY: The house was built prior to zoning in Albemarle. There are
no zoning files.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND QUALIFYING CONDITIONS: Mr. Carlton Luck
grew up on this property. This parcel is the same size and shape as it has been since
the beginning of zoning. There has been a minor property exchange which does not
relate to the house site or road. The parcel has about 900 feet of road frontage on Rt.
674. This parcel on the tax map includes a small unbuilt piece on the north side of the
road (which is not related to the present application). About 2/3 of the main portion of
the property is in 100 year floodplain for the Moormans River.
The house was built in the 1960s. It contains 960 gross square feet of living area and
793 square feet of basement. When Mr. Luck, Sr. built the house he designed it with
the intention of having a deck where it is now constructed. He began the foundation of
the deck and constructed the door to the deck area, but did not complete the deck
construction. For these many years since the house was built, the door remained well
above grade. Given the location of the existing dwelling, there is no location for a deck
addition which would meet zoning setback requirements.
VA 99-1 2 February 2, 1999
APPLICANT'S JUSTIFICATION AND STAFF COMMENT: A review of the variance
criteria provided by the applicants and comments by staff follows:
Hardship
The applicant comments that the variance is necessary:
• When the house was planned and built all arrangements were made for the deck to
be installed (approx. 8 feet above ground).
• The door was installed for access to the deck.
• Without the deck we will not be able to use the room for the original purpose.
Staff opinion is that generally a deck is not necessary for reasonable use of the
property. However due to the small size of the house, it could be seen as an undue
hardship. The gross living area of the house is less than 1000 square feet. In addition,
staff notes:
• There is no location for an addition which would meet setback requirements.
1. The applicant has provided evidence that the strict application of the
ordinance would produce undue hardship.
Uniqueness of Hardship
The applicant comments that the variance in necessary:
• There are no other properties involved and the state road goes thru the property.
• The uniqueness of this is that the house was built for a porch or deck and a door
was installed for this purpose. Please consider this factor.
Staff finds that this is a unique case. It is unique that a property was built prior to zoning
and designed with this purpose in mind. Improvements including the foundation and
access door for the deck were installed well over 30 years ago when the house was
built.
2. Evidence has been provided that such hardship is not shared generally by
other properties in the same zoning district and the same vicinity.
A Iva99-01.doc
VA 99-1 3 February 2, 1999
Impact on Character of the Area
The applicant offers:
• There are no other properties adjacent to this property. It only joins the road and the
river.
• The character of the district will be enhanced by this addition. The neighbors
welcome the change. •
Staff mentions that this addition is not visible from any houses. The closest house is up
the hill across Rt. 674 about % mile away. The deck is visible from the road. However,
this will be an improvement over the partially completed foundation and the door 8 feet
above ground. This and other work done by the applicants to improve the house and
property creates a positive impact on the character of the area.
3. The applicant has provided evidence that the authorization of such
variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and that the
character of the district will not be changed by the granting of the variance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Since this variance request meets all three criteria,
staff recommends approval for cause.
This variance is for the addition proposed in this file only. Any future additions (not
exempted by new ordinance language) will require amendment to this variance.
A Iva99-01 doc
G f O --.
, >° , 7- m-
-A Ig4Z4:$ , 4....--)3
0 \ de....4Z,
7 A 3
G r
t
In �f.� C14),,
. (t t 4
, ,, .. .
_,
. ..-. --- _ 0.\
Z cr
,„ i , --11-1 3
ti ; : 1.-
rt
cn b 4/ ' °s
c,
f ` � s�
i- .° 1 4::
�s Z��r:
� a
1-
s
7 s
,
.,:
n
' ' 7
s e3 1 O
A .� Q f c
,
.I0 / .
I .;
THE DIVISION OF THE LAND DESCRIBED HEREON IS WITH THE7
FREE CONSENT AND W ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRE OF THE '7/
UNDERSIGNED OWNER, PROPRIETORS AND TRUSTEES. ANY
REFERENCE TO FUTURE POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS TO BE
DEEMED AS THEORETICAL ONLY. ALL STATEMENTS AFFIXED TO
THIS PLAT ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY �l
KNOWLEDGE. 9C
T. .a15. IEXEtdPT
If i LY
,ADMIN
THE LAND USE REGULATIONS LISTED BELOW ARE IMPOSED PLAN C
PURSUANT TO THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE 'IOTSE
L
IN EFFECT THIS DATE AND ARE SHOWN FOR INFORMATION LOTS CREATED
PURPOSES ONLY. THEY ARE NOT RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
RUNNING WITH THE LAND AND THEIR APPEARANCE ON THIS
PLAT IS NOT INTENDED TO IMPOSE THEM AS SUCH.
APPROVED FOR RECORDATION //
DIRECTOR OF PLAN ING v
A. NO DIVISION RIGHTS SHALL BE EFFECTED BY THIS EXCHANGE.
OF
NOTES:
I. EACH PARCEL HAS A MINIMUM OF 30,000 SQUARE FEET
OF AREA WITH SLOPES LESS THAN 25%. t.
,L 42 g1G�-
2• DENOTES AREA WITHIN i.Mead PC' S. EG255 a3 r
��� PLAIN)ZONE A AS(100 YEAR FLOOD el.S\JER1-5.\5p,0 8'
SCALED FROM �� S. 5 pB• Za%
DATED 2THE 0 6 INSURANCED 80 COMMUN TY PANEL C�1PRO �o.e 442'o a 248�
510006 0075 B). THE REMAINDER 0 1099-14`, ,
OF THE TRACTS SHOWN HEREON O B • 576.43.46"t-
IS IN ZONE C. 22.98' i
w
506.1V15
IRON 2. 14
FOUND1, > RON
N59.30'00"E N.1 - SET
99.00' i 0 0
N. CV r, o ro
'• S58.0 °'
43.42' (NJ
EXISTING DRIVE- `o G a
`•• - J
N37.30'00"E ``� S27.48'33"W x , •
134.04' G, .I6'
•
_ 0,k DOx, p� G. •
41.151 '..., ,i r 4,,I ; '/ , 1/4
-4 0
LOT X /0.17 ACRES ID.B. 406-243 ,/ ///D///ft .
r,/'`4•1° �w .... �,.
D.B. 159-271 P OS •v. •
O��� IRON
`t ' SET
T.M. 27-45
BRUCE B. GORDON
D.B. 866-459, 460 PLAT -"IL .
•
PLAT SHOWING �.
SURVEY
LOT X, A PORTION OF T.M.TM27 43 BEING ADDED TO
LOT Y, A PORTION OF T.M. 27-42 BEING ADDED TO T.M. 27-43
LOCATED ON STATE ROUTE 674 & MOORMANS RIVER
I ABOUT ONE MILE WEST OF MILLINGTON r
WHITE HALL DISTRICT
ALBEMARLE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA
SCALE: I" = 100'
DATE: I0-09-91
FOR
• RICHARD T. Jr., & BEVERLY S. ERGENBRIGHT
ROGER W. RAY & ASSOC,.INC.
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA
8 0I5 A
ALBEMARLE COUNTY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING
401 MCINTIRE ROAD
MEETING ROOM #241, 2:00 P.M.
DRAFT AGENDA
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 1999
I. Call to Order
II. Establish a Quorum
III. Variance Public Hearings
VA-98-32 Charles Dunnivan, et al Estate
Staff Person: Amelia McCulley
VA-99-01 Carlton and Nancy Luck
Staff Person Amelia McCulley
VA-99-02 Rio Associates Limited Partnership (owner)
Interspace(applicant)
Staff Person Jan Sprinkle
VA-99-03 Donald E. Seal (owner)
Virginia Oil Company (applicant)
Staff Person Jan Sprinkle
IV. Old Business
V. New Business
VA-98-30 Phillip & Katharine Buchanan
Applicant Request for Rehearing
VI. Adjournment
C.\i:\zoning\bzal\agenda for Dec I meetmg.doc