The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSUB200100082 Application 2001-03-27 OFFICE USE ONLY / b6 SUB# D ---46 '� TMP - Application IKor Review 01 a Subdivision Plat ❑ Preliminary Plat U Final Plat ❑ Two-lot subdivision as described in section 14-232(B)(1)or if all lots front on an existing public street=$75 ❑ Resubdivision(section 14-239)= $75 ❑ Condominium Plat= $80 RECEIVED ❑ Vacation(section 14-240)= $135 5 copies of Plat are required for above ❑ 1 to 9 lots= $285 If subject to Planning Commission Review V ri ❑ 10 to 19 lots= $440 If subject to Planning Commission Review`'�� R ❑ 20 or more lots= $530 If subject to Planning Commission Review' $YCIZEVELOPMEN1 16 copies of Plat are required for first submittal of above-7 copies required for a revision Other matters subject to Planning Commission review: 114 Waiver,variation or substitution of subdivision requirements($140):Attach written justification ❑ Relief of conditions of prior approval($140):Prior File Name/Number Other matters subject to Administr lie ❑ Reinstatement of review($50) RAW 1 N ❑ Extension of plat approval($35)-Must be submitted at least Five(5)days prior to expiration of plat. ❑ Request to defer action on plat to an indefinite date($60) Per Zoning Ordinance ❑ Bonding inspection for plat($45) Other matters subject to Board of Supervisors review: ❑ Appeal to Board of Supervisors($190):Prior File Name/Number Zug mbar i s i) ILLS / S hrl ll Project Name: IRediv to►din. lmd- Skuu.; �� PAVi �.) G_IC + (St TV 34- —4-I Tax map and parcel: T►kP 34 -4 I �J 41111161 Contact Person(Who should we call/write concerning this project?): I nts. G dY V e PJ w tt,' Firm.. j Go-Ri1 I t rr-o G, G , Address I4 V1m&+tcel ,U �a Ci tyCg r cd{� ES� l C l'C State \/a Zip 229 0 Daytime Phone ) 91 1 -c2 a��' Fax# Z9'I - J 2 2-0 E-mail 71 Q l.�`� FL a.bu41.C at41, 0 Owner of Record S g64-L►M.,ba✓"t s 17. E Address 36.S3 G11 be2T .h41 Fat •City -1:3a�'bdttr3V I! c StateVQ i Zip ZZ'1Z Daytime Phone(84-4) 13 ` l 4-S T Fax# E-mail Applicant(Who is the Contact person representing?). SA Vk tJ Address City State Zip Daytime Phone( ) Fax# E-mail OFFICE USE ONLY � Fee amount$ /� Date Paid.r27 Check#Cq�C G�By Who?�(nt L+ -�I. Receipt#c 3 76J By: of County of Albemarle Department of Planning & Community Development 401 McIntire Road ❖ Charlottesville, VA 22902 ❖ Voice: 296-5823 ❖ Fax: 972-4035 9/14/98 Page 1 of 2 Property Information Does the owner of this property own(or have any ownership interest in) any abutting property? If yes, please list those tax map and parcel numbers L.)6 Physical Street Address(if assigned) Location of property(landmarks,intersections,or other) Magisterial District: —Rklocx).)► Zoning: Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Proposed use(s)of property: eeS I eke.�"'Ca✓I Acreage Information; Total parcel acreage: `+' 604 Acreage in new lots: #of new lots: Acreage in open space: Acreage in roads: k.) - Comments/Attachments: Owner/Applicant Must Read and Sign The Subdivision Plat application process process includes providing the Planning Commission with all the information required in Chapter 14 Subdivision of Land of the Albemarle County Code. The foregoing information is complete and correct to the best of my knowledge. I have read and understand the provisions of Chapter 14 Subdivision of Land of the Albemarle County Code. d1�1�t. Z d Signa ure of Owner, Contract Purchaser, gent / Date �- 16 YY) GA, 9 fl — O Zo Printed Name Daytime phone number of Signatory 9/14/98 Page 2 of 2 PHONE (804) 293-4251 rm e (804) 977-0205 FAX (804) 296-5220 INFO@ROUDABUSH COM ROUDABUSH, GALE & ASSOC., INC. LAND SURVEYORS A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ENGINEERS 914 MONTICELLO ROAD LAND PLANNERS ATTACHMENT E CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22902 J THOMAS GALE, L S MARILYNN R GALE, LS DOUGLAS R BRUCE, L.S WILLIAM J LEDBETTER, LS WILLIAM S ROUDABUSH, L.S EDWARD D CAMPBELL III, L S March 22, 2001 Members of the Planning Commission c/o Yadira Amarante, Albemarle County Planning Department 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA. 22901 RE: Subdivision Plat for TMP 34-41 into two lots - Waiver request to allow residue lot to use existing driveway and to allow the Parcel X to have a separate private entrance. Dear Planning Commission Members: On behalf of the applicant, I am hereby requesting a waiver of section 14-505A of the County Code which requires a subdivision to "have immediate vehicular access to only one public or private road, which is within the subdivision." In accordance with section 14-237 and in particular, paragraph C which states, "The commission may approve a waiver or variation if it finds that: (i) because of unusual size, topography, shape of the property, location of the property to other unusual conditions, excluding the proprietary interests of the developer, strict application of the applicable requirements would result in significant degradation of the property or land adjacent thereto; (ii) requiring the standard would not forward the purposes of this chapter or otherwise serve the public interest; and (iii) granting the waiver or variation would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, to the orderly development of the area, to sound engineering practices, or to adjacent land", following are the justifications for C(i), C(ii), and C(iii). In regard to C(i), both lots are heavily wooded except for the existing house, driveway and septic areas on the residue lot. Work associated with any additional driveway requirements to serve the two lots would involve both grading and clearing of trees. The amount of additional driveway that would be needed would be at least two hundred (200) feet. This disturbance, due to the grading required for the new driveway, coupled with the need to clear more trees than the two separate driveway option, would arguably result in significant degradation to the property. Also, adding to the this argument is the well located on the residue parcel. It is in an awkward location and may be affected if only one entrance is allowed. In regard to C (ii), the applicant has contacted VDOT and has had Charles Baber come to the property in order to check for a new entrance location for Parcel X. I checked with Mr. Baber and he indicated he could approve a new entrance on parcel X which would be in the vicinity of the new property line between Parcel X and the residue. Because of the curvature of Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT E he State Route 640, several trees would have to be removed in order to maintain VDOT's requirement of two hundred and fifty (250) feet of sight distance to the south of the new entrance. The extent of tree removal for this would be considerably less than requiring a new driveway connection across the residue parcel to serve Parcel X. Other than tree removal, no grading would be required to obtain sight distance. Additionally State Route 640 is a very rural road which is graveled instead of paved and the traffic volume is relatively low. For these reasons, it does not seem that requiring only one entrance would forward the intention of the Zoning ordinance or better serve the public. In regard to C (iii), the new driveway location option can meet VDOT's safety requirements. Due to the large amount of road frontage (544.63') of Parcel X and the low traffic and graveled status of State Route 640, allowing a separate entrance for Parcel X would not detract from the orderly development of the area or adversely impact adjacent landowners. On behalf of the applicant your consideration on this matter is appreciated. Sincerely, l o • om Gale, L.S. Page 2 of 2