HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201900012 Correspondence 2021-10-0530 Scale, LLC
871 Justin Drive, Palmyra, VA 22963
Ph. 434.242.2866
mike@30scale.com
ENGINEERING
September 30, 2021
Ms. Tori Kanellopoulos
Planner - Planning Services
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: SDP201900012 — Letter of Revision #2
Dear Tori,
Please find enclosed our electronic submission of Letter of Revision #3. We have included revised Sheets
1, 5, 7, 9, new Detail Sheets 9A, 9B and 9C, 14 and 15. These sheets have been revised as highlighted on
the plan sheets in accordance with the following:
1. Provided ADA access from new Egress -Only Door at the south end of garage to the street.
This was accomplished by providing a 44" (3.68') landing depth adjacent to the building. I have attached
an excerpt of the email exchange from Betty Slough of Building Code Enforcement that contains language
that a 44" depth of landing is sufficient. From the landing, the ADA access continues along the rear of the
Filterra and ultimately to a CG-12 curb ramp on to the street. As a result, one parking space was removed.
Detailed Cross -Sections were added to new Sheet 9B to indicate sidewalk horizontal and vertical clearances
from the Filterra, handrail locations, sidewalk/ramp slope, and building overhang.
2. Improved sidewalk access to Utility Room and Fire Department Connection.
We removed the awkward sidewalk connection (awkward both horizontally and vertically) from the Utility
room to the main entrance area and extended the sidewalk from the Utility Room directly out to the street
and added a CG-12 curb ramp, resulting in the loss of an additional parking space, for a total of 2 less
parking spaces with this LOR. Note the parking tabulations on Sheet 5 have been updated and included
with this submission. Sheet 9A provides additional detail above and beyond what is shown on the Layout
Plan (Sheet 7) and Grading Plan (Sheet 9).
3. Revised sidewalk at southwest corner of building to address headroom conflict with the building
overhang.
At this location, we revised the sidewalk to a minimum 36" width, added a handrail (with pickets) on the
street side of the sidewalk, and added a flexible plastic wand at the building corner as directed by
Engineering, and as was approved by Engineering in email exchange dated January 27, 2021. Please note
that (2) additional flexible plastic wands were added at the northern end of the overhang since the
concrete sidewalk had already been poured from the back of curb to the building. Refer to new Sheet 9C
for details.
4. Revised the site entrance median.
To address damage that has occurred to the median over the years from vehicles, we have revised the plan
to remove the proposed concrete pavers in the median, and to provide pavement striping at the east and
west ends of the median instead. The middle portion of the median will remain as a planting area with
hardy landscaping species proposed. Refer to the details on Sheet 9A.
1 1 P a g e
30 Scale, LLC
871 Justin Drive, Palmyra, VA 22963
Ph. 434.242.2866
mike@30scale.com
SCALE
ENGINEERING
S. Removal of a portion of the concrete area at main lobby entrance (southern corner of building)
and replacement with planting area.
The outdoor sitting area has increased from 560 sf to 640 sf. Refer to new Sheet 9A for detailed layout
and grading.
6. Revised the species of street trees along Inglewood Drive from Linden to Zelkova based on
improved survivability of the Zelkovas.
The landscape plan and calculations (Sheets 14 and 15) have been adjusted accordingly.
7. Added a 2nd 2" Water Meter as coordinated with ACSA and County Building Code Enforcement.
Refer to Sheet 7.
S. Shifted the location of the Fire Department Connection to the face of the building at the Utility
room as approved by Shawn Maddox in email dated November 9, 2020. Refer to Sheet 7.
9. Extended the concrete sidewalk by 2' to connect to the east side of the building (Inglewood
Drive side). Refer to Sheet 7.
We thank you for taking the time to review this Letter of Revision. Please feel free to call me any time at 434-
242-2566 if you have any questions or would like additional information.
Si
P.E., CFM
Mr. John Regan
Mr. Randy Steck
2 1 P a g e
9-30-21 — TORI, SEE 441E RAMP WIDTH LANGUAGE
Mike Myers HIGHLIGHTED ON P. 2 OF THIS EMAIL.
From:
Tom King <tking@devereauxarch.com>
Sent:
Thursday, September 23, 2021 5:04 PM
To:
Mike Myers
Subject:
FW: 2015 IBC Sections 1010.1.6 and 1012.6.2; 2009 A117.1 Sections 405.7.2 and 405.7.4
See attached from Betty.
T O M K I N G
A S S O C I A T E
1477 CHAIN BRIDGE RD, SUITE 200
M C L E AN, VA 22101
7 0 3. 8 9 3. 0 1 0 2
W W W.DEVEREAUXARCH.COM
TKING@DEVE REAUKARCH, COM
DwA&tc-o, & Xwa "
ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS
From: Betty Slough <bslough@albemarle.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 2:25 PM
To: Tom King <tking@devereauxarch.com>
Cc: mdellinger@albermarle.org; 'Randy Steck' <steck@christophercompanies.com>; Dwayne Via
<DVIA@albemarle.org>; Scott Reuschling <sreuschling2@albemarle.org>; Scott Good <sgood@albemarle.org>; Mark
Greenfield <mgreenfield@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: 2015 IBC Sections 1010.1.6 and 1012.6.2; 2009 A117.1 Sections 405.7.2 and 405.7.4
Tom,
I appreciate all the time and attempts to get this issue resolved. Our collective group in
the County has spent an equal amount of time, study and research on this as well. Dwayne's
code book has even lost it's cover. As with most things, there is a bit of welcome news and
some not expected turns.
In reviewing the response from ICC, Albemarle County can agree that the landing at the
door needs to be a minimum 44" measured perpendicular from and 60" parallel to the plane
of the building face.
In our repeated rereading of the applicable code sections, another issue was
discovered. Please see the code sections copied below.
1012.5.1 Width and capacity.
The minimum width and required capacity of a means of egress ramp shall be not less than that required
for corridors by Section 1020.2. The clear width of a ramp between handrails, if provided, or other permissible
projections shall be 36 inches (914 mm) minimum.
1020.2 Width and capacity.
1
The required capacity of corridors shall be determined as specified in Section 1005.1, but the minimum width
shall be not less than that specified in Table 1020.2.
TABLE 1020.2
MINIMUM CORRIDOR WIDTH
OCCUPANCY
Any facility not listed in this table
Access to and the utilization of mechanical, plumbing or electrical systems or equipment
ith an occupant load of less than 50
ithin a dwelling unit
In Group E having an occupant load of 100 or more
In corridor and areas serving picture traffic in ambulatory care facilities
Group I-2 in areas where required for bed movement
In corridor of Group I-2 assisted living facilities licensed by the Virginia department of social services serving areas witF
gurney traffic where residents are capable of self-preservation or where resident rooms have a means of egress door I,
outside.
1 inch = 25.4 mm.
Based on these two sections, wouldn't the entire ramp width be required to be a minimum of
44", less the encroachment of the handrails? The occupant load exiting the building at this
door would be 71. Please advise your reasoning for either the 36" ramp proposed or the 44"
that we feel is required. Xtl—
Regards,
9-30-2021
TORI, WE ARE
Betty R Slough PROVIDING A 4 4 " RAMP
Commercial Plan Reviewer/ Deputy Building Official
Albemarle County WIDTH — SEE SECTIONS
https://www.albemarle.org/ ON SHEET 9B .
bsloughPalbemarle.org
7
office 434-296-5832 x3362
cell 434-872-3793
401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA 22902
From: Tom King <tking@devereauxarch.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 20215:09 PM
To: Betty Slough <bsloueh@albemarle.ore>
Cc: mdellinger@albermarle.org; 'Randy Steck'<steck@christophercompanies.com>
Subject: FW: 2015 IBC Sections 1010.1.6 and 1012.6.2; 2009 A117.1 Sections 405.7.2 and 405.7.4
CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open
attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.
Betty,
I sent an email to the ICC for further clarification regarding the landing at Stonefield Apartments as we discussed, please
the response below.
I am available to discuss at your convenience.
Thank you,
Tom
T O M K I N G
A S S O C I A T E
1477CNAIN BRIDGE RD, SUITE 200
MC IE A N, VA 22101
7 0 7 6 9 7 0 1 0 2
W W W.UEVEREAURARCN. COM
TRINGpDEV EREAURARCN. COM
&/I
ARCNITEC IS AND RIANNE RS
From: Kimberly Paarlberg <kpaarlberg@iccsafe.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 20214:43 PM
To: Tom King <tkins@devereauxarch.com>
Subject: RE: 2015 IBC Sections 1010.1.6 and 1012.6.2; 2009 A117.1 Sections 405.7.2 and 405.7.4
Tom,
The drawing you sent me did not require an enlarged landing outside of the door. This is not a change of direction on a
ramp. This is not a door used as an accessible entrance.
Best regards,
K. vi,ber[U tPaarlberg
ICC Senior Staff Architect, Codes and Standards Department
Mike Myers
From:
John Anderson <janderson2@albemarle.org>
Sent:
Wednesday, January 27, 2021 1:34 PM
To:
Mike Myers; Tori Kanellopoulos
Cc:
Randy Steck; Stuart Lutterloh; Kevin Jones
Subject:
RE: Stonefield - Sidewalk Plan
Attachments:
STONEFIELD - SIDEWALK EXHIBIT.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Thanks, Mike.
Attached exhibit is sufficient response to email sent 12/4/2020 2:32 PM, and Engineering has no objection. Please coordinate
whatever form /format review approval may be required by Planning (Tori Kanellopoulos). Thanks, again —take care, best, J.
Anderson 434.296-5832-x3069
From Attached:
pk' 1�N� 1
E
I
1
From: Mike Myers <mike@30scale.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 10:51 AM
To: Tori Kanellopoulos <vkanellopoulos@albemarle.org>; John Anderson <janderson2@albemarle.org>; Tori
Kanellopoulos <vkanellopoulos@albemarle.org>
Cc: Randy Steck <steck@christophercompanies.com>; Stuart Lutterloh <Stuart@christophercompanies.com>; Kevin
Jones <Kevin@christophercompanies.com>
Subject: Stonefield - Sidewalk Plan
Tori and John, Please find enclosed an exhibit showing how we would like to address the conflict
between the building overhang at the southwest corner of the building and a 5' clear sidewalk width
have attached the email from John outlining the options.
We have added approximately 40 linear feet of handrail on the travel lane side of the sidewalk.
We also appreciated the suggestion to curve the sidewalk to force pedestrians away from the corner
Unfortunately, this adjustment is not possible due to conflict with the grades of the adjacent handicap
ramp. However, the 2"-DIA durable plastic wand will achieve this goal.
Please review and let us know if we are OK to proceed with this installation. Thanks! Mike
Michael Myers, PE, CFM 30 Scale, LLC I C: 434-242-2866 1 Web: 30Scale.corn
@ 2020 - 30 SCALE, LLC
ATTACHMENT FROM MIKE
MYERS' EMAIL TO TORI
AND JOHN DATED
11111111111111127111111111111112021
2016 ROAD & BRIDGE STANDARDS
PL
MAX. 6'-0"�h�MAX. 6'-0"�`I GRIPPING RAIL SEE ROAD ANS
FOR RETAINING HR-1
O.C.;'"" NPS PIPE PICKET I WALL DETAILS.
�I I...4'/i'
4ye•' O.0 s/s" SOLID PICKET
MAX. 6'-0" MAX. 6'-0"
I/2' DIA. SOLD STEEL SMOOTH
ROUND ROD (TYP.) OR
I n
I" STANDARD PIPE.
I a
I I l
GROUNDING
I I ELECTRODE
RAIL EXPANSION JOINTS AT 1' ANCHOR
3" MAX. BOLTS
4" O.C.-'1 �•--
INTERVALS NOT EXCEEDING
ITYF.)
30 FEEL
1'-3" POSTS + 2" MIN. NPS (2.375" O.D.) SCHEDULE 80 PIPE
` 1 '•
RETAINING WALL RAILS 2" MIN. NPS (2.375" O.D,) SCHL�IILE 4C PIPE
MIN
EXPANSION JOINT PICKETS Y4' IN. NPS (1,05" O.D.) SCHEDULE 40 PIPE
3" MAX.
OR " MIN. SOLID STEEL SMOOTH ROUND ROD
HR-1 TYPE II PEDESTRIAN RAILING
ANCHOR BOLTS
(FOR USE ALONG SIDEWALKS AND RAMPS)
n
SEE ROADWAY PLANS
2" min. 12"
OR TYPICAL SECTIONS
MIN
CONCRETE STEPS
FOR DISTANCE TO 11/Z' NPS SCHEDULE 40 PIP
I
POSTS 1/q" MIN. NPS 0.90" O.D.) SCHEDULE 80 PIPE
SIDEWALK OR SHARED GRIPPING RAIL
RAILS + P/Z' MIN. NPS 11.90" O.DJ SCHEDULE 40 PIPE
USE PATH' GROUNDING
ELECTRODE
12 2'/� m�'
u1N".
HR-1 TYPE I HANDRAIL
(FOR USE ALONG STEPS)
NOTES
I' SOLID STEEL
ROUND R
1. THE CONTRATOR SHALL SUBMIT DRAWINGS DETAILING ALL
SMOOTH
ASPECTS OF FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION OF RAILING.
CONCRETE FOOTING TO
INCLUDING CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY THE
BE DESIGNED BASED ON GRIPPING RAIL DETAIL
ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL
SOIL CONDITIONS. 12" ANC OR BOLTS (FOR USE ALONG SIDEWALKS AND RAMPS)
BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY A PROFFESSIONAL ENGINEER,
MIN.
HOLDING A VALID LICENSE TO PRACTICE ENGINEERING N
GRIPPING RAIL SHALL BE INSTALLED WHEN
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA.
THE SIDEWALK OR RAMP GRADES ARE EQUAL
2. ALL RAILING COMPONENTS AND FASTENERS SHALL BE GALVANIZED IN
EARTH FOUNDATION DETAIL THAN 5 NT
LRBETINCIDENTAL
WITH THE ROAD SPECIFICATIONS.
RAIL WILOR
TO THE COSTOFTO
ACHIEVE UNIFORM COATING ON ALLNT GATAND
SURFACES
(FOR USE WITH TYPE II& IIIRALINGS) THE RAILING,
DRAINAGE HOLES FOR GALVANIZING SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE
SHOP DRAWINGS.
3. ALL FASTENERS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A307,
MAX. 6'-0' MAX. 6'-O"
��
ASTM A563. AND ASTM F844. ALL ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO M314, GRADE 36.
SEE ROAD PLANS
4I/z' O.C. 3'4' NPS PIPE PICKET 4' FOR RETAINING
4. A CHEMICAL ANCHOR SYSTEM FROM VDOT'S APPROVED MATERIAL
41/a" O.C. W SOLID PICKET 4 WALL DETAILS.
LIST MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF CAST IN PLACE ANCHORS AND SHALL
BE INCLUDED IN THE SHOP DRAWINGS.
5. POSTS SHALL BE MITERED TO MATCH GRADE OF RAMPS. SIDEWALKS,
AND STEPS.
I I I
6 HANDRAILS SHALL MATCH GRADE OF RAMPS SIDEWALKS AND STEPS.
I
7. ALL POSTS AND PICKETS SHALL BE SET PLUMS.
I I I
B. RAILINGS SHALL BE GROUNDED AND EFFECTIVELY BONDED.
I
INSTALLATION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE
I I I
WROU STD. EATERIALS
I
RAILING
9 COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE IN LIEU
SYSTEMS MAY BE
I I I
OF DESIGNING AND FBRICATING HE RAILING. DOCUMENTATION FROM
1 ANCHOR
THE MANUFACTRIRER VERIFYING THAT PROJECT REQUIREMENTS ARE
RAIL EXPANSION JOINTS AT BOLTS
MET WITH THE RAILING SYSTEM SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE
INTERVALS NOT EXCEEDING 3" MAX.
INSTALLATION DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER IN
30 FEET.
ACCORDANCE WITH NOTE 1.
POSTS + 2" MIN, NPS 12.375" O.D.) SCHEDULE 80 PIPE
10. HANDRAIL TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF
RETAINING WALL RAILS + 2" MIN. NPS (2.375" O.D.1 SCHEDULE 40 PIPE
THE VIRGINIA UNIFORM STATEWIDE BUILDING CODE.
EXPANSION JOINT PICKETS N. NPS (1.05" O.D.) SCHEDULE 40 PIPE
D. THIS HANDRAIL IS TO BE USED ONLY AS A PROTECTION FOR
MIN. SOLID STEEL SMOOTH ROUND ROD GROUNDING
PEDESTRIANS AND SHOULD NOT BE PLACED IN ANY LOCATION
ELECTRODE
HR i TYPE III BICYCLE RAILING
WHERE IT MIGHT BE SUBJECT TO ANY VEHICULAR IMPACT.
(FOR USE ALONG SHARED USE PATHS)
FOR VEHICULAR PROTECTION STADARD GUARDRAIL SHOULD
BE USED.
SPECIFICATION
A COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SEALED AND SIGNED DRAWING IS ON FILE IN THE CENTRAL OFFICE.
XVD❑T
REFERENCE
STANDARD HANDRAIL
ROAD AND BRIDGE STANDARDS
105
METHOD OF LOCATING AND ERECTING
REVISION DATE
SHEET 1 OF 1
38
601.05
504
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
7/11
2016 ROAD & BRIDGE STANDARDS
ImEe�\19110MIx97:111F_1II
SIDEWALK DETAIL
0 5 10 15
SCALE: 1 "=5'
ODISCALE
ENGINEERING
owner:
OPZ BERNSTEIN/CHRISTOPHE
engineer:
30 SCALE, LLC
871 JUSTIN DRIVE
PALMYRA, VA 22963
p: 434.242.2866
e: mike@30scale.com
web: www.30scale.com
1
LU
W
Q
m
N
,vLu
— I
CL
N
C)
V
O
J
m
sheet title:
SITE PLAN
DETAIL
sheet #
(V
fV
I
O
I
i
C
Ci
8AOF 25
scale:
111=51
date:
1/27/2021
Mike Myers
From: Shawn Maddox <smaddox@albemarle.org>
Sent: Monday, November 9, 2020 8:27 AM
To: Mike Myers
Subject: RE: Stonefield - Phase 2 - Multifamily Building - Revised FDC Connection Location
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Good morning Mike —thanks for the call this morning. I have no objection with moving the FDC from the approved
location to the one shown on the building. The new location still meets all fire code requirements for spacing and
visibility. Thank you,
Shawn
Shawn Maddox
Deputy Fire Marshal
Albemarle County
smaddox@albemarle.org
office 434-296-5833
cell 434-326-2623
460 Stagecoach Road, Suite F, Charlottesville, VA 22902
From: Mike Myers <mike@30scale.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2020 7:28 AM
To: Shawn Maddox <smaddox@albemarle.org>
Subject: Stonefield - Phase 2 - Multifamily Building - Revised FDC Connection Location
CAUTION: This message originated outside the County of Albemarle email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or open
attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.
Shawn, Can we shift the FDC from the remote location to be at the building utility room? It is visible
from the road. See below, I've also attached the full-size plan sheet. Please let me know, thanks!
Mike
1
m DRA L
FSI1T
r FIG 212
I }
I 4
I� I
EX.41t WID ACSA
WATER AND SAN
SEW ESMT.
/ PHASE
LINE
lot
i51
i
�I I
I I A PARKING SIGN (I)
EX. 8' X 22' SWM
o- FACILnY EASEMENT
6A (DO 5281 PG 320) (84 SP
Ra ea Ba
O O WA ER/, 14. WNFIEL
— FIR _____ _I (TrP)
ENT NCd:: � — — —
I A - RI ADA PARKING SIGNS
i AND(1)VAN AD, �
B' 7RMATIN
RAL i PARKING SIGN :zis
6'ERAL:'B'� F� �
TRANCE
"76.5• LOBBY BID ENTRANCE / E
lOtl .%6. THE I_6,000 GSF) MARKER PDBT6 / fl�111
GMTE ANDPEDESTAPAVERS-RFFER � rl(.) I l5 I iII ARCH PUN _— _
I
1 18 PLLIeO%
I, I 2 r j o—maov. "ANDRA1� a s INaFwddD DRNE - - I
Michael Myers, PE, CFM 30 Scale, LLC C: 434-242-2866 Web: 30Scale.com
a