HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA200200003 Correspondence 2002-02-08 4. •
RICHMOND AND FISHBURNE, L.L.P.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
JOSEPH W RICHMOND,JR. QUEEN CHARLOTTE SQUARE JOSEPH W RICHMOND
WENDALL L WINN.JR 214 EAST HIGH STREET (1918-1986)
MATTHEW B MURRAY 0
THOMAS O.NOLAN P 0.BOX 559 JUNIUS R.FISHBURNE
CHRISTINE THOMSON CHARLOTTESVILLE,VIRGINIA 22902-0559 (1915-19911
JOSEPH M.COCHRAN
MARR J NELSON (434) 977-8590
PATRICIA P SHIELDS FAX (434) 296-9861
MARCELLE MOREL WWW richfish.com
o ALSO ADMITTED IN DC
February 8, 2002
Albemarle County Board of Zoning Appeals BY HAND
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
Attn: John Shepherd
Re: Judy Rice Robbins Estate Variance Application
Dear John:
Per your request, I enclose a letter of authorization signed by the three
beneficiaries of the Judy Rice Robbins Estate authorizing me to make any and all applications
with Albemarle County in connection with this property. Please let me know if anything further
is needed.
I am providing you and the Board of Zoning Appeals a chronology of events
involving the property. I hope that this information will be helpful to you and the Board in
considering our application. The following events have brought us to this point:
1. In August 1962, James and Edith Rice divided property that they owned
located on Proffit Road into six building lots. A copy of the 1962 plat which is recorded in Deed
Book 382, page 24 is attached as Exhibit A. Sometime thereafter, James and Edith Rice built a
house on Lot 4.
2. In 1978, James and Edith Rice built another house on Lot 6. As Roger
Ray's plat shows, the house placement violates side yard and front yard setbacks. A variance for
the front yard violation was approved by the Board in 1978. A copy of the approval letter is
attached as Exhibit B. The side yard violation was, apparently,not discovered until Roger Ray
prepared his plat. We have tried to resolve this matter by adjusting the boundary line with the
Clatterbucks who own the adjacent property but they have declined to cooperate.
3. In 1989, James and Edith Rice provided a septic drainfield easement
across Lots 4 and 5 and a small portion of Lot 6 for the benefit of Lot 3. They also eliminated
Lot 5 by combining part of Lot 5 with Lot 4 calling the resulting parcel Lot 4A and combining
RICHMOND AND FISHBURNE, L.L.P.
Albemarle County Board of Zoning Appeals
February 8, 2002
Page 2
the remaining portion of Lot 5 with Lot 6 calling the resulting parcel Lot 6A. The septic
drainfield easement and the creation of Lots 4A and 6A were accomplished by a plat, dated
November 20, 1989, and recorded in Deed Book 1002,page 313, a copy of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit C.
4. In 1997, Edith Rice, now a widow, conveyed to her daughter, Judy Rice
Robbins, the 1978 house and Lot 6 (the"Robbins Property")by reference to the 1962 plat. A
copy of the deed is attached hereto as Exhibit D. Unfortunately,the 1997 deed incorrectly
referred to the property conveyed as being Lot 6 as shown on the 1962 plat and should have
referred to the property as being Lot 6A shown on the1989 plat.
5. In the spring of 2001, Judy Rice Robbins died and her three children
(herein the"Grandchildren")placed the Robbins Property on the market for sale. They signed a
contract to sell the Robbins Property, and the buyer obtained a survey from Roger Ray, a copy of
which is attached as Exhibit E. The buyer also conducted a title search and discovered that the
1997 deed from Edith Rice to her daughter was in error and should have conveyed Lot 6A by
reference to the 1989 plat rather than Lot 6 shown on the 1962 plat. Thus, the Grandchildren
now own Lot 6 as shown on the 1962 plat, and Edith Rice continues to own a portion of Lot 5
and all of Lot 4A.
When the 1997 conveyance error was brought to the attention of Edith Rice, and
she reviewed Roger Ray's plat along with the 1989 plat, she took the position that the lot line
configuration that was created by the 1989 plat was in error and that when she conveyed the
house and property to her daughter in 1997, she thought she was conveying property with a
different boundary line. Consequently, she would not agree to execute a new deed of
conveyance to clear the title problem.
Negotiations insued between Edith Rice and the Grandchildren to re-establish the
boundary line. Ms. Rice has agreed to re-establish the boundary line as shown on Exhibit F. A
benefit of the new line is that it places a block wall, light pole,well, and frame building, all of
which belong to Ms. Rice and her property within the bounds of her property. Also, the new
boundary line will not adversely impact any of the amenities on any adjacent property, including
septic drainfields.
A problem with the new line is that old Lot 6A, which is a non-conforming lot,
will be made even more non-conforming in area, lot width, and road frontage. However, old Lot
4A, also a non-conforming lot,will benefit from the new boundary line by making it more
conforming with zoning regulations by increasing its area, lot width, and road frontage.
a w
RICHMOND AND FISHBi7BNE, L.L.P.
Albemarle County Board of Zoning Appeals
February 8, 2002
Page 3
We were told by county staff that we would need to determine the status of the
existing septic system that serves the Robbins Property and also determine whether or not a
reserve drainfield is available to serve that property. We, therefore, hired Baseline Consultants
who studied the property and prepared a report which was submitted with the variance
application. Baseline was able to find the existing drainlines which are within
the bounds of the Robbins Property, the new boundary line that Ms. Rice has agreed to, and it
has found suitable soils for a reserve area which would accept a system as more particularly set
forth in his report. The Baseline report, however, shows that the reserve area has a slope of 35%
Consequently, part of our variance request includes a variance from provisions of the Zoning
Ordinance pertaining to construction on critical slopes.
The Board should know that no new construction is contemplated by our variance
request. All structures on the properties affected by the variance request were built in 1978 or
prior thereto. The variance request simply is an attempt to clear up a side yard violation that has
existed for 24 years and to clear a title problem. Our variance request, therefore, consists of the
following:
1. Side yard setback variance request to resolve the side yard setback
violation created when the 1978 house was constructed.
2. Area, lot width, and road frontage violations created by the
re-establishment of a boundary line between old Lot 6 (Robbins Property) and old Lot 4 (Edith
Rice Property).
3. Critical slope variance for a reserve drainfield area.
The hardship that is presented by this case is that if these matters are not cleared
by the variance approvals, the property will be rendered unmarketable. The topography requires
the critical slope variance and the existing structures, unwillingness of adjacent property owners
to cooperate further, and the existance of once conforming lots now being non-conforming under
county ordinances, all create a unique circumstance as to this particular property and, therefore,
justify the approval of the variance request.
0 SID
RICHMOND AND FISHBURNE, L.L.P.
Albemarle County Board of Zoning Appeals
February 8, 2002
Page 4
I hope this information is helpful to you and the Board. Please let me know if any
other information is needed or would be helpful for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Jos h M. Cochran
JMC/v
Enclosures
cc: Ms. Sherri R. Ryder
r re\docs\01\robbins\01-0960\countyzomngappeal.wpd
9-27-2001 8: 12AM F —ZONING 4349724126 EXHIBIT
ROh,TLDG
,v•{ OF A L,BE-
Air
CP
Inspections Department
Zoning Division •
414 EAST MARKET STREET
J. BENJAMIN DICK CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22001 ANDRC•W EVANS
20NINO A OMINICTIIATOII t904) 2!)5.5832 •emeit IW.rc llo,
March 16, 1978 1
j
Mr. and Mrs. James Rice
Route 4, Box 124
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Re: Board of Zoning Appeals Action VA-78-04
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Rice:
This letter is to inform you that on March 14, 1978, during the
regular meeting of the Albemarle County Board of Zoning Appeals, your
application for VA-78-04 was granted to allow your house to be positioned
65 feet from the road right-of-way.
If you shdulsd -lithe any questions, please Contact the Zoning Department.
Respectfully, \
J. Benjamin Dick
Zoning Department
JBD/gr
cc: L 78-04
• BIT ►
1(0 l 7/41 o2
THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY: JOHN A. DEZIO, ATTORNEY
THIS DEED OF GIFT, made and entered into this 5th day of June, 1997, by
and between EDITH A. RICE, widow, Grantor, and JUDY RICE ROBBINS, Grantee,
whose mailing address is 7677 Proffitt Road, Charlottaavllla, VA 22911;
WITNESSETH :
That for and in consideration of the natural love and affection of the parties for
each other, Edith A. Rice, widow, hereby GIVES, GRANTS, and CONVEYS with
GENERAL WARRANTY AND ENGLISH COVENANTS OF TITLE unto Judy Rice
Robbins all that certain lot or parcel of land in the Rivanna Magisterial District of Albemarle
County, Virginia, fronting on the easterly margin of State Route 649, containing 27,860
square feet, more particularly described as Lot 6, on a plat of Amos R. Sweet, Certified
Surveyor, dated August 1962, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of said
County in Deed Book 383, page 24; being a portion of the property conveyed to James Rice
and Edith A. Rice, his wife,jointly for their joint lives with remainder to the survvivor in fee
simple, by deed of H. W. Klugh and Mary E. Klugh, his wife, dated December 24, 1945 of
record in said Clerk's Office in Deed Book 266, page 445.
James Rice died on March 23, 1997, survived by his wife, Edith A. Rice who
is unmarried.
Said conveyance is subject to restrictions, easements and conditions contained
in duly recorded deeds, plats and other instruments constituting constructive notice in the
chain of title to the above-described property which have not expired by a time limitation
contained therein or otherwise have become ineffective.
Reference is made to the aforesaid deed and plat for a more particular
description of the property conveyed herein and for matters affecting same.
This deed of gift is exempt from taxation pursuant to Section 58.1-811D of the
Code of Virginia.
)_ ..
..'7M l 4
imp 011 1 , limm
1 i
WITNESS the following signature and seal:
�f �lL{- �✓ . JT"-�a t(SEAL)
Edith A. Rice
i
STATE OF VIRGINIA
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, to-wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this G'u') day of
(21a , , 1997 by Edith A. Rice.
G'
My commission expires 0 3/, 4)
m .
Notary Public
4
,
If
VIRGINIA: IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ALBEMARLE:
THIS DEED WAS PRESENTED, AND WITH CERTIFICATE ANNEXED, IS ADMITTED
TO RECORD ON 9 C.tf1P_ 9' , 1997 ,AT I',5 to O'CLOCK Q M.
STATE TAX �/ S (039) r
LOCAL TAX S (213)
TRANSFER FEE $ 14C) (212)
I.T.T.F. $ 3.00_(106)
VSLF $ 1.00 (145)
CLERK'S FEE $ Ja in() (30I)
PLAT $
SECT.S8.1-802: TFSiE:
STATE TAX $ (038) SHELBY J.MARSHALL,CLERK
LOCAL TAX $ (220)
LOCAL TAX $ (223) Bidorg X .q_ -m a,
DEPUTY CLERK
TOTAL $ 17•(D Q
62I U2/2dd2 13:.3( bctUbJZnicJ tS/017LlIYC
al)
s, r, page _4_ of 5
Baseline
Consultants Soil Profile Descriptions
Project: T.M.#46-32F, lot 6A. reserve Project#: 22013AL Date; 1/30/02
Hole Soil Depth Description Texture Est.
ID Horizon [inches) Class Rate
6A A 0-6" very dark grayish brown (2.5Y3/2) silt loam, common
Schist fragments III
CB 6-24" dark olive gray (5Y3/2) silt loam with common schist
fragments, auger refusal C+ 24" III 65
GB A 0-10" very dark grayish brown (2.5Y3/2) loam, few schist
fragments ii
C 10-24" very dark gray (2.5Y3/1) silt loam saprolite, few
weathered schist fragments, auger refusal a 24" III 65
6C A 0-12" dark grayish brown (2.5Y4/2) loam, few schist fragments II
CB 12-26" olive brown (2.5Y4/3) loam to silt loam Ii-III
C 26-56" bluish-gray (5P95/1) silt loam schist saprolite and
weathered fragments, auger refusal 6i 56" III 65
6D A 6-10" very dark grayish brown (2.5Y3/2) loam, common gravel II
BC 10-34" olive brown (2.5Y4/4) silt loam and light silty clay
loam, few weathered graphite schist fragments III
C 34-42" olive gray (5Y4/2) silt loam graphite schist saprolite,
few weathered graphite schist fragments, auger refusal
Q 42" III 65
6E A 0-10" dark grayish brown (2.5Y42) loam to silt loam, few
schist fragments II-III
CB 10-24" olive brown (2.5Y4/3) silt loam, few silty clay loam
seams, auger refusal a 24" in dark bluish-gray (5PB3/1)
graphite schist III 65
•
•
17L/U I'Z J JL 4176 3LD J
page _a_ of 5
r
r - Certification
Baseline Consultants statement
County: Louisa Date: 26 Jan, 2002
Property Identification: Rt. 649 "Judy Rice Robbins Estate"
{T.M.#46-32F} Lot 6A
Submitted by: Baseline Consultants
This is to certify according to 32.1-163.5 of the Code of Virginia that work
submitted for the referred property is in accordance to and complies with
the Sewage Handling and Disposal Regulations of the Va. Department of
Health. I recommend a subdivision approval be approved.
Dave Grant, CPSS/AOSE #024
02/02/2002 13:37 5408325 9 BASELINE CON ANTS PAGE 08
. I
s Invoice
Baseline Consultants
Date: 2/1/02
Project: Rt. 649 reserve drainfield Project# 22013AL
Client:
Sherri R. Ryder
Address: 13 Stonewall Road
Palmyra, Va. 22963
434-589-2662
Description: one drainfield layout (ie. site evaluation, soil borings, soil evaluation, soil profile
descriptions, site demarcation, report, map, county liaison, etc.) for one reserve
area site for plat re-approval as per client request via Joe Cocheran, Atty;
Amount Due: one drainfield @ $300 $300.00
Total Due: $300.00
Thanks for your business, ancLplease call with any questions or if we may be of future
help. Bill is due receipt (1.5% per month on unpaid balance.) Please mail to address below.
Thanks Again, n
3550 Echo Valley Road, 3arboursville, Virginia. 22923 Phone: 540-832-2409 Fax: 540-832-5109