The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZMA200000009 Study 2001-09-11 Traffic Impact Study North Pointe Development Albemarle County, Virginia Prepared for: Towers Limited Partnership and Great Eastern Management Company Prepared by: Wilbur Smith Associates !!�//1 ECoNoM1sr Wilbur Smith Associates September 11 , 2001 //I►\\ G1NEERS 11111* PLANNERS ISOM ECONONIIs s \\V// Wilbur Smith Associates September 11, 2001 Mr. Don Wagner 10 East Franklin Street Great Eastern Management Company Richmond,VA 23219-2131 51 2619 Hydraulic Road (o04)(804) 643-66 644-zi09 fax Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 wilbursmith corn SUBJECT: North Pointe Traffic Impact Assessment Albemarle County, Virginia Dear Mr. Wagner: In accordance with our contract, we are pleased to present findings of our traffic impact assessment for the mixed-use development of North Pointe, located in Albemarle County, Virginia. This letter report outlines the study methodology and findings. Project Site The proposed development will consist of multi-use land uses on the east side of Seminole Trail (U.S. Route 29) north of Proffit Road / Airport Road (State Route 649) to opposite and just slightly north of Lewis & Clark Drive, which is the main entrance from U.S. 29 to the Universityof Virginia Real Estate Foundation's (UREF's) North Fork Research Park. North Pointe will have one entrance from Proffit Road at Worth Crossing extended approximately 700' from U.S. 29. Additionally, there will be three entrances along U.S. 29, (from thesouth) the first (Road "El") will be located 1700' from Proffit Road / Airport Road, second, (Road"E3") will be located 2400' from Road "El" and the third, (Road "D") opposite Lewis & Clark Drive is located approximately 2750' from Road "E3". The U.S. 29 entrances are consistent with the agreement between the applicant and the County which led, in 1994, to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment which brought the North Pointe property into the growth area for a combination of residential, office and commercial uses and to VDOT - Charlottesville Residency and Albemarle County comments of 23 February 01. Development Assumptions Figure 1 shows the general location of North Pointe as it relates to the surrounding road network. For purposes of this study, it is assumed that the development will be in place by the year 2010. Table 1 summarizes the land use and site generated traffic for the North Pointe development. Total daily site generated traffic at full development is estimated to be 29,418 vehicle trips. The full development site generated trips include applicable pass-by and internal capture rates which are consistent with VDOT Charlottesville Residency comments of 23 February 01. Existing Traffic Conditions Figure 2 summarizes existing AM and PM peak hol.x vehicle turning movements at the applicable intersections along U.S. Route 29 and Proffit Road. These counts were performed by WSA on Tuesday, December 5th, 2000. Actual count data can be found in Appendix A. As agreed at our 27 September 00 scoping meeting with VDOT Charlottesville Residency representatives and Albany NY,Anaheim CA,Atlanta GA,Baltimore MD,Bangkok Thailand,Burlington VT Charleston SC.Charleston WV Chicago IL,Cincinnati OH.Cleseland OH Columbia SC, Columbus OH, Dallas TX, Dubai UAE, Falls Church NA, Greemrllc SC Hong Kong, Houston TX. Iselin NJ, Kansas City MO, Knoxville TN Lansing Ml.Lexington KY,London UK,Milwaukee AVI Mumbai India,Myrtle Beach SC.Ness Ibsen CT Orlando FL,Philadelphia PA,Pittsburgh PA.Portland NIL Poughkeepsie NY,Raleigh NC,Richmond VA Salt Lake Cits ITT. San Francisco CA,Tallahassee FL.Tampa FL,Tempe AZ,Trenton NJ,\\ashnigton DC Employee-Owned Compam rr _ . r7.J s.... i as , ,^.,. Imo, t. \- -, ,„,.. .„ _, — I \ f--..... . LEWIS&." 4▪ D"D„ /�/ •t .„ ,, I V. CLARK DR'• ; N., t!' { \`.i•T., ,: f ,. cq a4 i APTS.\ f-Q €.��• \; i pJ '" i t� TF ?T221 \,.... sp, ----fl--f ;:-".. , , _ . 1 ..;,_ ,:,.. 4.,- . ,_ E t,- ..:, p •- 1. f --•-•-•-• i 1 . ' - '---:"-- ---7.''' s- 4.- ,�` /-, 1 . 1 1 i.r • !'-... %' 1 L rT"~ rr vie' s i ii . CYPRESS DR •�, -�!• _: , ONDO •, �,,2 �t, ``` r ,, • ,,,,,,, w ,, tot • -,_, GRAVEL e r 3 :, #� DRIVEWAY -L gym' ...' ; 'APT1. + • ` .,, - COTTAGE t.: , Ili Ire • i` 0.`,41 .;-�--,+ , i - HOTEL 0 ''• . "- -- \ 1 ,-,1 ' .?\'A O I •1. i.� L. 14i- L .'O ,� i 11 91 .1 '&®-rile OFFICE ; . ..-� OUTPARCELS' I pp t 4r. , , I % tJ O 4 ti't p • ti AIRPORT I Y' f.x`4 i--�°. °7.'76 4% -q- I! ACRES (N) ,, _-s� ' t 0 Elr -s+, :•,s(1; a 4� q .� �, i a0 p t%n.3. r AIRPORT I cxi� .4 t-c. i try✓ 0:5 6. \ ,'_ CRES (S) _ .. `' -pi,I-t + i. " — - — • a,. _�"-'3 "= +F' -pf,Ja,i;,+c4 p ,t_,.-�-" ,. :o' LEGEND. !I.,,,xi : 'y. U•r • INTERSECTION Aft P_ 3y�-�1 i:,L ,.i In #1, kilt%' +%. }. .f ANALYZED(SEE AIRPORT DR .'_ '' I(_,� , d ' ��5 3L� FIGURES 5 SA ) i 1:i.;.,,, E /MN` NI-igure i �NNW Site Map 1 O LEGEND M —00 (7) 00-AM Peak Hour • LEWIS& CLARK DR (00)-PM Peak Hour (252)29 • 1 (241)21 1 N O N r .-4 N 00 00 O \O N rn `N-' � 01 00 N `' M ON W CYPRESS DR 1 n (10)3 t v (7)20 o rn CI' " t 28(59) M rY N tr) rnrn `' '� ^L f 15(24) Q .� ^. '^a 7-. c 7 N j p63(68) M u 1/40 cc, (65)38__t� 1 AIRPORT i 1 (40)21-4 O en [- I ACRES (N) (118) 101—4 rn v N o rn (2)0 (4) 10 T o .....— co — SATURDAY —. N et. v v 12/2/00 WSA Counts. N vN AIRPORT CRES (S) (0)6 f 1 t C7 ( )8 I 1 z v oo u= O 3 0o M V � .-. oN � No v, rn" 97(182) o— ; 3(3) FO -e-83(77) v o`^ f-299(258) AIRPORT DR IF i--159(93) PROFFIT RD J j L ,F55(50) (189)72 t I I (5) 10_J fr (128 48--► v v v (278)213-*. I ) r- h 00 _ O (157)94� ^ 6 (-4 (73)54 v v' v en - co SOURCE:WSA Tuesday, 12/5/00 counts. .�K� ' Figure I-M US `l Wir Existing Background Traffic 2 \ v ',, Albemarle County representatives, we would collect traffic data at the intersection of U.S. 29 and Proffit Road on a Saturday during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods and compare the data to thatof a weekday. If the weekday data were greater than the weekend we would not analyze the weekend peak periods. Projected Year 2010 Background Traffic To estimate the local background traffic in place at the time of full development of North Pointe, recent traffic growth patterns were reviewed. Table 2 summarizes average daily traffic on the U.S. Route 29 road segment between Hollymead Drive (State Route 1520) and State Route 1510 from 1993 to 1997. The average annual growth rate as specified by VDOT ant Albemarle County is four percent. This growth rate is applied to the existing background traffic in Figure 2 to produce the projected 2010 background traffic shown in Figure 3. Additionally, the UREF North Fork Development at Phase I traffic is inclucd and assumed to be in place, although, as directed by VDOT, the improvements on Route 29 which UREF will be required to construct are not included in the intersection analysis. Site Traffic The percent distribution for the residential, Office/industrel Park, shopping center and out parcel land uses of North Pointe are shown on Figures 4a through 4c respectively. This distribution is applied to the site generated trips illustrated in Table 1 to establish the projected site traffic shown on Figure 4. Additionally, Figure 4 includes the internal capture that reduces the trips generated onto the surrounding public roadways. The internal capture is realistically assumed based on trends in the development of large multiuse parcels such as North Pointe. North Pointe will provide necessary residential (apartment to single family and empty nesters), commercial and office space that provides a resident or office employee the services they desire without accessing the local roadways. Background Plus Site Traffic The site traffic in Figure 4 is superimposed onto the background traffic in 2010 to come up with the projected site and background traffic volumes (Total Traffic) illustrated in Figure 5. The total traffic provides the basis for the roadway capacity analyses. Figure 5a shows the approximate internal site traffic volumes and Figure 5b shows the projected average daily traffic (ADT) along the internal road network. As stated earlier these figures reflect the reduction in sitegenerated traffic that traverses the surrounding roadways. Roadway Adequacy Analyses Intersection capacity analyses for AM and PM peak hour conditions were analyzed for the traffic volumes depicted in Figures 5 and 5a using the roadway geometrics shown in Figures 6 and 6a. The highway capacity analysis can be found in Appendix B. Generally speaking, the roadway analysis indicates that U.S. 29 will fail during the peak a.m. and p.m. periods for both the 2010 background and the 2010 total traffic scenarios at the proposed signaled intersections. In other words, for a few hours each day these intersections will generally not meet VDOT standards for an intersection on an arterial highway whether or not North Pointe is developed. * q 00 SOURCE: WSA Tuesday, 12/5/00 counts grown 4%annually. A O M N 00 - a; (*)Future UREF North Fork Development added. N LEWIS& l vi CLARKLEGEND: DR ♦ 00-AM Peak Hour (1672)103* I (1169)195* t (00)-PM Peak Hour * 00 * 00 , N N N Co• r. V .11 N 0 Ol v N N.. -zr ) CYPRESS DR ♦ N (15)4 v (10)301 t v L41 (87) en en O O 7 • rn N " f22(36) " � J 1L �93(101) 7 N N M O * N M (96)56A 1 r AIRPORT j 1 (59)31 ACRES (N) M VCA D CD (175) 149� = v (3)0 1 N �, ,-(6) 15 ' - — SATURDAY*cn 0 v ,-v 12/2/00 WSA Counts. M O. M O .... N AIRPORT I ACRES (S) �I (0)9 f 1 t C7 (l)8— o x ^ o I—, Cn N P4 6, .. � * 3 U � .7, .-. , 197(293)* r" o L4(4) ON N -+ -• N `v ---141(123)* (4- 515(415)* 1AIRPORT DR J r235(138) PROFFIT RD J l L ♦ 81 (74) f *(401)199� r•-• (7) 15_ t *(210)75--► ° c 2 *(490 328--► r *(514)190— v M p. •—00 (108)80 1 N en* N* ii11Mkk Figure MINN) Projected 2010 Background Traffic 3 M � A N d' 25(22) LEWIS& 10(6) NCLARK DR 1 L. r7(23) 1 I" 0, I _ o _ CO<_3_,. ,... ,.... ........ CO WI CO N V O, rn ~ _45(90) IL 206(285) SITE GRAVEL DRIVEWAY t r ON CrN See N Figure 5a N co v v O 00 o for N L77(303) AIRPORT I L r123474) Imernal ACRES (N) i Site (--- t r Traffic O N ^ N • cl 00 CV CA M M i M AIRPORT ACRES(S) t LEGEND: 0 00-AM Peak Hour _ 00 � v) M 0 (00)-PM Peak Hour o N - N t+1 � v `tvvccv A_ 18(10) ,0roo ni n 36(62) I I 76(139) AIRPORT DR 1 �— 32(162) PROFFIT RD J� 1 "► f 1 g 10 ( ) • (90)53 A t r c (216)76 (49)24—► I (21)5 SOURCE: ITE Trip Generation M O Manual,6th Ed. ,o 4iike.. Figure ENIIIMSI IMMO MINN ‘ii\\Mr Site Generated Traffic 4 MA All Parcels o o t__(10%) LEWIS& NCLARK DR L v"(5%) Residential (5%) GRAVEL I L (55%) DRIVEWAY t r 0 0 0 o SITE N AIRPORT C„ ACRES (N) 0 � 1 „,„ AIRPORT ACRES (S) t 0 or4 3 o AIRPORT DR (10%) PROFFIT RD � 5% 5%-11- r LEGEND: 1 0% 00-%Site Entering o 0 o v) 0 (00)-%Site Exiting riiKOih. Figure NMI MIMI \\�C.C1 Site Generated Traffic Distribution 4a Residential 111 A - N LEWIS& I L t (2%) NCLARK DR 1 t M M (13%) SITE L r_ (30%) GRAVEL - DRIVEWAY N I N a+ N Office/ Ind. Park rn AIRPORT (35%) ACRES S(N) t r 00 kr) o N ,t 0 AIRPORT ACRES S(S) i 1 F v) o 1 o � l 5% 10% AIRPORT DR 1 L . f-(5%) PROFFIT RD i' f 5% 5% A i 5%__A LEGEND: 5%—� (5%)—► t 00-%Site Entering o (00)-%Site Exiting iiik��. Figure \M Site Generated Traffic Distribution 4b \i\iSA Office/Ind. Park Vl LEWIS & CLARK DR it 5% � I 0 0 V'1 Vl � N 0, N SITE GRAVEL DRIVEWAY tcn o (30%) AIRPORT L (30%) Out Parcels ACRES S(N) Shopping Center 0 AIRPORT ACRES S(S) F O O 3 � ^o „ " oo .�.N (5%) .N..^..'". AIRPORT DR / __(20%) PROFFIT RD J L L ]0% 5% LEGEND: 5% 25% o 00-%Site Entering N N N (00)-%Site Exiting Araks Figure NOMA wimurma Site Generated Traffic Distribution 4c Shopping Center & Out Parcels 0 • .t N 00 00 v N 35(28) 0 00 M f-0(0) LEWIS& I r-37(23) CLARK DR y i (1672)103 o (1205 09� o v O rn 1 t r N - ^ i en 7 M O - \O i 1 ," Nt N' v' 45(90) CYPRESS . GRAVEL 1 L , 206(285) SITE DR (15)4 III I (10)30� DRIVE t r — N C N 00 — v O en N CA N I-- r. en N M V1 M M See � N � , N M - 69(303) Figure 5a AIRPORT1L 123(445) ACRES (N) J for 1 (3)0 (6) 15 1 1 r Internal N ON N Site M .-- vl en M Traffic M O v r. N d' AIRPORT J I u; ACRE S (S) + • -110)9( (1)8-•-• o v N WORTH LEGEND: t •v v CROSSING 00-AM Peak Hour ,;;.-- o ,.c ',* 215(303) o - 80(134) (00)-PM Peak Hour M o v .- `" -177(185) `� `�' v' -4-533(425) AIRPORT DR 1 1 L ,�267(300) PROFFIT RD J 1 L ,�81(74) (491)252 t t J (214)91 t! (259)99., v1 r,1 1 (511)333-.- (514)190 v ff 108 80 `� v^ SOURCE:WSA Tuesday, � M v ( ) - N — 00 .� 12/5/00 counts grown 4%annually. ME\ Figure SIMI MINI/om. 2010 Total Traffic 5 N MA . RD"D" SINGLE v o0 '1" ! 2 FAMILY N � � M [- 18(11) (43)13 t J L �2(45) (47)20 1 �* ° N rn i o0 1 N c4 (6)9 • f RD"B" (22)36 , I CONDO �/ �' oN 1 d °.° o (2)5 v `� 0000 (9)19 -;roo o, -a- r- M a �_ 190(193) rI O M RD`E3" �— 24(28) .. 4 o �v^ � 1 - - � W (289)156—� (99)29 t t 6(7) i ri) (138)119� (227)13 j- -IT110- �1(2) sO M OFFICE M .� OFFICE °----, .c:> A -4' t 1/1- (34)73 (9)18-17 oo 6 OFFICE — r N v 98(20) APART RETIRE(RD"C")"' ., 1, L 4 �8(6) L 28(6) PARCELSO `� I9(110)� i— 20(67) RD"E2„ o (8)42 A SHOP 00 rn 145(361)� L 4(22) (26)4—� r j f-- 21(122) M cv (67)20 M M 1 ' SHOP (77)13 t r M E-,,, a.N (110)19� NI M 00 N. 01 ro 10 en ,-.1 M N O V vl ,7 M N .-. N o0 IM A 60(126) 48(278) RD"E1'� I --4- 63(365) —96(223) 10.. 35(202) SHOP (334)205 (268)96 ►•� I (317)133-4 (484)159—� (315)93 + o (163)83—� M o v t — oo SHOP SHOP „nil 1 15(87) (86)15 II II' PROFFIT RD O N — 00 M O O, o0 M M DRAWN TO SHOW TRAFFIC ONLY. SEE FIGURE 1 FOR BE 1'I'ER VISUALIZATION. OMKebk ■ Figure tAIMIN1 2010 Internal Site Traffic \MII� MA 5a RD"D" 1,353 . SINGLE 2 FAMILY N o k 00 H N RD"B„ !� N 00 I— N CONDO o0 6,354 4,528 N RD"E3" o0 N OFFICE oo OFFICE APART RETIRE(RD"C") OFFICE o N OUT 2,174 2,736 RD"E2" PARCELS SHOP N SHOP N kris 13,068 9,606 8,712 RD"E 1" SHOP N N 00 00 01 cri SHOP SHOP PROFFIT RD 4,728 O0 DRAWN TO SHOW TRAFFIC ONLY.SEE FIGURE 1 FOR BEI.1"ER VISUALIZATION. AIM i i Figure 2010 Internal Site Traffic NomI1/ \/,cA ADT 5b LEWIS& J I I L CLARK DR +i CYPRESS .111 DR GRAVEL *1!► 1It DRIVE +kr SITE AIRPORT �J 1 ACRES (N) i rn N AIRPORT (� ACRES (S) H O u AIRPORT DR -J11`► f PROFFIT RD -► 1f tf I -i I� -i' I tINIIMMI Figure MEN/ Preliminary Road Improvements NalmrWSA Future Analysis 6 I iRD"D„ A _4J ¢ SINGLE _+ 2 FAMILY N 'It N �UL RD«B„ � 4-1ttr 0 Z)t-'4 F CONDO � � oc_ . - - 'Itt 1 2 � w .1 RD"E3" _ 4 l tt OFFICE .4L .t_ OFFICE APART RETIRE(RD"C") OFFICE tt I OUT + # RD"E2" J 4 L A- PARCELS i - SHOP f' fi t' ' lttr SHOP t--- p-011- _ .1L --4- RD"El" —� lr SHOP -► —i —► —► SHOP -464 SHOP -----t t... PROFFIT RD I I ///I1 arimumis Figure 1111111111110 Internal Road Geometrics MA 6a The intersection of U.S. 29 and Lewis and Clark Drive was identified in earlier studies for UREF as , / being deficient at full build out to the extent that an interchange was proposed. Therefore, needed V significant improvements to this intersection are not the result of the North Pointe development. Conversely, the signalization of U.S. 29 and Airport Acres (N) commercial entrance will provide for acceptable side street access to U.S. 29 but the U.S. 29 through movement will fail with and without the UREF U.S. 29 improvements. As was the case at Lewis and Clark Drive, failure of Jthrough movements on U.S. 29 at this intersection is independent of the development of North Pointe. The failure of through movement for all the proposed signalized intersections along U.S. 29 is a symptom of the fact that U.S. 29 fom the Albemarle County line to Charlottesville City Limits is the major commercial artery for Albemarle and adjoining counties, as well as a major North-South travel corridor through Central Virginia. The signalization of the Profitt Road and Worth Crossing intersection will provide the much-needed relief as indicated by the results of the 2010 background traffic analysis. Table 3 summarizes results of the intersection capacity analyses. Conclusions The following summarizes conclusions reached based cn the previously described traffic analyses. • U. S. 29-Left turn lanes (in the median) and right turn lanes should be provided at the crossovers at Airport Acres (northern entrance) and at the main entrance. A right turn lane should be provided for northbound traffic at the third entrance at the intersection of Lewis and Clark Dr. • To the extent right-of-way is available, left and right turn lanes should be provided on Proffit Road at the Proffit Road entrance (Worth Crossing). • The entrance roads from Route 29 into North Pointe should be four-lane undivided (70' minimum right of way)for a minimum distance of 200' in from U.S. 29 to provide for two lanes entering and two lanes exiting. • The entrance road from Proffit Rd should be three•lane undivided (50' minimum right of way) to provide for one lane in and two lanes out. The entrances to the retail shops off of this entrance road are right in/right out only. • "Road A" (primary north-south internal road) should be four-lane divided (90' minimum right of way) from the southern entrance (Road El) to the northern entrance (Road D). This will provide for a five lane typical section, which will allow for a center turn lane. • "Road E2," which provides access to the office space and out parcels, should be a bur lane undivided facility (70' minimum right of way). • "Road A," north of"Road D," a two-lane undivided facility (50' minimum right of way) is necessary to accommodate the projected traffic. • The roads intersecting "Road A" (Road B, Condo, Road C, and Shop) should be two- lane, undivided facilities (50' minimum right of way). • Signalization should be provided at the main commercial entrance located on U.S. 29 opposite Airport Acres (N), at the center entrance from U.S. 29, i.e. the intersection of Road "E3" and U.S. 29, at the intersection of Proffit Rd. and Worth Crossing which provides access from Proffit Rd., and subject to further study as more detailed plans for the commercial area are developed internally at Worth Crossing and Rd."El" and, at the intersection of Roads"El" and "E2" south of the out parcels. We trust this study provides the needed traffic information for you in planning for this important project, and proceeding with its development. Respectfully submitted, WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES os‘Cejrid. Wallace Project Manager JTW/jtw Table 1 TRIP GENERATION North Point Development-Albemarle County,Virginia AM PEAK PM PEAK LAND USE ITE CODE UNITS 24-HOUR ENTER EXIT ENTER EXIT Office/Industrial Park: ^' Industrial Park a• Oa 130 70,000 Square Feet I q G 1,095 66 15 16 61 General Office 3. act_ 710 150,000 Square Feet Li (3 1,812 227 31 42 205 -5%Office Internal Capture "J 91 11 2 2 10 General Office Subtotal: 1,721 215 29 40 195 Office/Industrial Park Total: 2,817 282 44 56 256 Shopping Center. 820 425,000 Square Feet/77 17,283 231 148 783 848 -15%Shopping Center Internal Capture 2,592 35 22 117 127 Shopping Center Total: 14,691 196 125 666 721 Out Parcels: Hotel 25 , 310 250 Occupied Rooms 2,230 96 70 280 291 /,Convenience Market w/Gas Pumps 0 853 3,200 Square Feet 2,706 73 73 97 97 Drive-In Bank / 912 3,600 Square Feet 1,014 25 20 99 99 Fast Food w/Drive-Through Window S 834 3,200 Square Feet 1,588 81 78 56 51 Drugstore with Drive-Through Window p(S' 881 10,000 Square Feet 882 15 11 51 53 Out Parcels Subtotal(w/out Hotel): 6,189 195 183 302 300 -25%Pass-By Traffic w/out Hotel 1,547 49 46 76 75 Out Parcels Subtotal(w/out Hotel): T 4,642 146 137 227 225 Out Parcels Total(with Hotel): 9j/ `` 6,872 242 207 506 516 Residential: Single-Family/Detached Housing 210 390 Dwelling Units 3,626 71 212 234 132 Residential Condominium/Townhouse 230 60 Dwelling Units 422 6 28 27 13 Apartments(50 units North Point,200 units Dr.Hurt Property) 220 250 Dwelling Units 1,633 20 107 103 51 Retirement Community(Empty Nesters)' 250 90 Dwelling Units 248 7 8 12 10 Residential Total: 5,929 104 356 376 205 -15%Residential Internal Capture 889 16 53 56 31 Residential Total: , 88 302 320 175 GRAND TOTAL: K.,..29,418 808 678 1,548 1,668 SOURCE:"Trip Generation Handbook,6th ed;"Institute of Transportation Engineers NOTE:(*)Because weekday is not availbale,used Saturday for 24 hour average daily trip. Table 2 PERCENT GROWTH RATE North Point Development - Charlottesville, Virginia Seminole Trail (Rt 29) between Rt 631 (Rio Rd) and Rt 1520 (Hollymead Dr) AVERAGE DAILY PERCENT YEAR TRAFFIC CHANGE 1993 36,000 - 1994 37,000 2.70 1995 38,000 2.63 1996 40,000 5.00 1997 38,000 -5.26 AVERAGE YEAR GROWTH: 1 .3% AVERAGE YEAR GROWTH USED: 2% Seminole Trail (Rt 29) between Rt 1520 (Hollymead Dr) & Rt 1510 AVERAGE DAILY PERCENT YEAR TRAFFIC CHANGE 1993 28,000 - 1994 30,000 6.67 1995 30,000 0.00 1996 32,000 6.25 1997 33,000 3.03 AVERAGE YEAR GROWTH: 3.9% % AVERAGE YEAR GROWTH USED: 4% SOURCE: VDOT Primary Roads Books. - 111111 a Table 3 LOS SUMMARY North Point Developement-Albemarle County,VA Scenario Intersection Approach Existing 2010 Background 2010 Total AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay Profit and Worth EB A 7.9 A 7 9 A 8 6 A 8 2 A 9.2 A 9.7 C 32.8 D 47.8 WB A 7 8 A 7.8 A 8.2 A 8.7 A 8.2 A 8.8 D 47.7 D 36.3 NB B 10 B 10.9 B 11 4 B 14.9 D 30.7 F 365.5 D 42.3 D 50.8 SB C 17.9 C 19.6 E 35.2 E 48.3 F 271.3 F 281 6 D 39.9 D 52.5 ` ,a�. "i,°aa''.4i,.•sx�«:.Ttfi+ a_ ..: .a ! .,.;� ,�*` ti.� .,�y. Rt 29 and Airport EB D 51.7 F 197.6 F 91.7 F 209.2 F 154.2 F 293.5 WB E 62,8 F 168.5 F 126.5 D 43 F 162.8 F 124,8 NB C 29.9 E 56.3 E 71.5 F 200.3 F 101.1 F 299.5 SB D 50.5 D 35,1 F 256.6 F 376 F 378,2 F 395,6 g ^,*t ,�$:::ti+ -, A, .. ..y ',�^ ?k. d„ §>3 F ,."S b,y rs r4.,;r„y�.�e 4 tx-: rt+: '!�-,,n.' f .", 4% � t�1,gt,-��'`?' �, ?� ,3y': `�"<r�t'�,,,>;: F�,:, .., ;,s, ,stla"+��*fi ,�� „: ,dz+>,..:,,v,�°e ,. ,:.�^.''ra,:*�E}k�*i*�� ,�,,15'r.- .. r;t. sYz��s�• ' 'p�f'3�P`�w�,t�em,a�`<�,.t�E�#s.�;.0E. Rt 29 and Airport Acres(S) EB WB NB B 13.4 B 13 1 C 24.1 F 50 3 D 32.9 F 136.4 SB nt x Rt 29 and Airport Acres(N) EB D 41.7 D 52.3 (Commercial Entrance) WB F - D 40 D 37.7 NB C 19 C 153 F 558 F 91 5 F 764 F 149.1 F - F SB E 39 F - F 357.2 F �R., s »'e Z7`'':: Y Y.�«,>.: ,.:�, r i §"tir,':3;''',2�e'x':.U ^y^t+• �+�3. s,`a i�-r '�4• o_�U�:'-,b�, .' ,.:_�.� Rt 29 and Cypress EB WB NB C 194 B 123 F 52.2 E 42 F 637 F 616 SB ,.70 r ., " „j,. ,ktaiWa' .M-.< Rt 29 and Lewis&Clark EB C 24 6 F 106 9 D 53.1 F 235.9 F 80.4 F 242.2 (Residential Entrance) WB NB F 171 2 B 10 8 F 132.3 F 128.7 F 132.6 F 221.6 SB F 303.9 F 167.9 F 443.9 F 310.7 ak.}' � Fx Y✓ U v Rt 29 and Business Entran -EB - - - - - - - - WB - - - - - - - E 60.3 F 128.2 NB - - - - - - - - B 14.1 F 178.3 SB - - - - - - F 132.9 F 113 Items shown in BOLD indicate signalized intersections. I APPENDIX A WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES DEC. 2 & 5, 2000 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS I TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT FORM COUNTY. Albemarle LOCATION. Rt 29&Cypress Dr. DATE 12/6/00 DAY OF WEEK.Wednesday COUNTED BY F I. INTERSECTION NUMBER COMMENTS NORTHBOUND ON SOUTHBOUND ON EASTBOUND ON TIME PERIOD RT 29 RT 29 CYPRESS DR PEAK FROM TO L T T R L R TOTAL TOTAL 6:00 6:15 0 88 191 0 4 1 284 1,775 6:15 6:30 3 107 295 0 0 2 407 2,136 6:30 6:45 1 182 347 2 2 4 538 2,542 6:45 7:00 2 166 371 1 1 5 546 2,726 7:00 7:15 1 171 465 1 3 4 645 2,940 7:15 7:30 1 183 620 1 1 7 813 2,986 7:30 7:45 0 225 488 2 0 7 722 2,796 7:45 8:00 1 282 473 0 2 2 760 2,684 8:00 8:15 7 243 437 0 0 4 691 2,394 8:15 8:30 1 203 414 1 1 3 623 1,703 8:30 8:45 0 195 412 2 0 1 610 1,080 8:45 9:00 0 172 296 0 2 0 470 470 PK HR TOTALS 9 933 2,018 3 3 20 2,986 10,860 PK HR FACTOR 0 83 0.83 0.81 0 81 0 72 0 72 TOTAL 11 1,674 3,605 7 9 28 5,334 ' NORTHBOUND ON SOUTHBOUND ON EASTBOUND ON TIME PERIOD RT 29 RT 29 CYPRESS DR PEAK FROM TO L T T R L R TOTAL TOTAL 16:00 16:15 8 401 238 0 0 3 650 2,884 16:15 16:30 4 418 289 3 2 3 719 3,129 16:30 16:45 4 451 298 2 6 2 763 3,200 16:45 17:00 6 456 288 0 2 0 752 3,292 17:00 17:15 3 504 381 2 1 4 895 3,239 17:15 17:30 3 458 322 0 5 2 790 2,344 17:30 17:45 1 533 317 1 2 1 855 1,554 17:45 18:00 5 384 305 1 3 1 699 699 18:00 18:15 4 378 305 1 2 0 690 2,111 18:15 18:30 5 352 241 1 0 1 600 1,421 18:30 18:45 4 269 205 3 4 1 486 821 18:45 19:00 4 165 158 2 4 2 335 335 PK HR TOTALS 13 1,951 1,308 3 10 7 3,292 10,429 PK HR FACTOR 0.92 0.92 0.86 0 86 0.61 0 61 TOTAL 34 3,605 2,438 9 21 16 6,123 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT FORM Show INTERSECTION North DIAGRAM COUNTY Albemarle LOCATION:Rt 29&Airport Dr. DATE. 12/5/00 DAY OF WEEK.Tuesday COUNTED BY.S T.&F.I. INTERSECTION NUMBER COMMENTS NORTHBOUND ON SOUTHBOUND ON EASTBOUND ON WESTBOUND ON TIME PERIOD RT 29 RT 29 AIRPORT DR PROFFIT RD PEAK FROM TO L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL TOTAL 6:00 6:15 _ 24 53 1 6 45 7 5 2 13 11 3 3 173 1,344 6:15 6:30 21 73 19 9 84 11 2 5 6 14 2 7 253 1,844 6:30 6:45 18 124 6 19 210 13 8 6 15 13 6 6 444 2,337 6:45 7:00 28 152 16 18 175 19 9 4 11 26 11 5 474 2,682 7:00 7:15 36 118 3 39 350 26 14 15 17 26 10 19 673 3,124 7:15 7:30 30 183 7 39 335 16 23 12 25 39 12 25 746 3.127 7:30 7.45 32 176 14 50 363 25 18 18 25 40 16 12 789 3,007 7:45 8:00 42 252 13 24 421 12 12 7 12 45 36 40 916 2,877 8:00 8:15 40 163 20 26 275 16 19 11 32 35 19 20 676 2,626 8:15 8:30 41 177 21 15 235 16 15 10 21 28 21 26 626 1,950 8:30 8:45 39 201 16 27 225 18 11 17 29 40 12 24 659 1,324 8:45 9:00 34 170 14 23 275 18 15 17 26 29 16 28 665 665 PK HR TOTALS 144 774 54 139 1,394 69 72 48 94 159 83 97 3,127 11,637 PK HR FACTOR 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.88 0.88 0.88 0 86 0.86 0.86 0 70 0 70 0.70 TOTAL 294 1,440 108 243 2,479 147 127 107 187 282 142 194 5,750 NORTHBOUND ON SOUTHBOUND ON EASTBOUND ON WESTBOUND ON TIME PERIOD RT 29 RT 29 AIRPORT DR PROFFIT RD PEAK FROM TO L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL TOTAL 16.00 16:15 47 347 21 20 172 28 30 24 23 26 12 32 782 3,714 16:15 16:30 62 419 30 47 196 22 23 19 22 20 10 25 895 3,931 16:30 16:45 47 350 24 42 252 20 40 20 43 15 21 51 925 4,174 16:45 17:00 57 395 40 42 358 21 49 25 49 19 17 40 1,112 4,361 17:00 17:15 49 364 33 53 254 27 56 49 37 29 21 27 999 4,107 17:15 17:30 44 460 21 43 352 21 46 23 41 20 18 49 1,138 3,108 17:30 17:45 53 417 32 53 324 22 38 31 30 25 21 66 1,112 1,970 17:45 18:00 29 373 31 34 227 14 28 16 37 17 15 37 858 858 18:00 18:15 43 303 28 38 248 22 29 17 49 11 15 31 834 3,180 18:15 18:30 53 293 40 17 301 13 17 12 50 34 15 25 870 2,346 18:30 18:45 35 276 26 11 234 24 13 5 43 17 10 19 713 1,476 18:45 19:00 49 258 20 31 224 49 25 26 47 13 5 16 763 763 PK HR TOTALS 203 1,636 126 191 1,288 91 189 128 157 93 77 182 4,361 13,546 PK HR FACTOR 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.79 0.79 0.79 TOTAL 388 3,125 232 334 2,135 175 310 207 282 171 135 327 7,821 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT FORM i COUNTY: Albemarle LOCATION Rt 29& North Fork Research Park DATE 1/10/01 DAY OF WEEK Wednesday COUNTED BY. C T.D INTERSECTION NUMBER COMMENTS NORTHBOUND ON SOUTHBOUND ON EASTBOUND ON TIME PERIOD RT 29 RT 29 NORTH FORK RES. PARK PEAK FROM TO L T T R L R TOTAL TOTAL 6.00 6.15 3 66 166 2 2 1 240 1,738 6:15 6:30 9 99 275 10 3 1 397 2,122 6 30 6:45 10 128, 377 7 1 2 525 2,562 6:45 7:00 11 173 365 23 2 2 576 2,950 7:00 7:15 18 141 433 28 3 1 624 3,272 7:15 7:30 29 197 572 24 9 6 837 3,453 7:30 7:45 40 212 599 53 6 3 913 3,335 7:45 8:00 80 251 480 74 5 8 898 3,106 8.00 8:15 73 210 467 42 9 4 805 2,865 8.15 8:30 55 209 399 41 9 6 719 2,060 8.30 8:45 33 202 404 33 4 8 684 1,341 8 45 9:00 47 194 372 31 10 3 657 657 PK HR TOTALS 222, 870 2,118 193 29 21 3,453 12,759 PK HR FACTOR 0.82 0.82 0.89 0 89 0.83 0.83 TOTAL 375 1,616 3,726 326 55 39 6,137 NORTHBOUND ON SOUTHBOUND ON EASTBOUND ON TIME PERIOD RT 29 RT 29 NORTH FORK RES. PARK PEAK FROM TO L T T R L R TOTAL TOTAL 16:00 16:15 3 255 162 r 7 7 11 445 2,281 16:15 16:30 6 292 178 5 15 20 516 2,700 16.30 16-45 1 314 191 6 28 32 572 2,974 16.45 17:00 3 387 237 4 52 65 748 3,254. 17.00 17:15 4 412 251 11 98 88 864 3,183 17:15 17:30 16 411 249 9 52 53 790 2,319 17:30 17:45 3 482 273 9 50 35 852 1,529 17:45 18:00 2 389 241 10 9 26 677 677 18:00 18:15 1 377 237 12 10 12 649 2,224 18:15 18:30 3 313 235 6 10 5 572 1,575 18:30 18:45 1 348 194 4 11 6 564 1,003 18:45 19:00 2 249 164 6 10 8 439 439 PK HR TOTALS 26 1,692 1,010 33 252 241 3,254 10,285 PK HR FACTOR 0 89 0.89, 0.92 0 92 0.66 0 66 TOTAL 38 2,942 1,782 61 311 330 5,464 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT FORM Show INTERSECTION North DIAGRAM COUNTY. Albemarle LOCATION.Proffit Rd&Worth Crossing DATE: 12/5/00 DAY OF WEEK Tuesday COUNTED BY:M.H. INTERSECTION NUMBER COMMENTS NORTHBOUND ON SOUTHBOUND ON EASTBOUND ON WESTBOUND ON TIME PERIOD WORTH CROSSING WORTH CROSSING PROFFIT RD FROFFIT RD PEAK IFROM TO L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL TOTAL 6:00 6.15 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 19 3 5 24 1 54 328 6:15 6:30 1 0 3 0, 0 0 2 24 1 4 17 0 52 441 6:30 6:45 1 1 5 0 0 0 4 46 3 7 45 1 113 585 I6:45 7:00 7 0 7 1 0 1 2 27 7 5 50 2 109 678 7:00 7:15 9 0 8 2 0 3 2 53 9 15 66 0 167 740 7:15 7:30 13 1 16 0 0 1 1, 73 17 12 61 1 196 738 7.30 7:45 17 0 13 1 0 0 2 41 15 17 98 2 206 710 I7:45 8:00 9 0 13 0 0 0 5 46 13 11 74 0 171 633 8.00 8:15 13 0 17 0 0 2 2 41 15 13 61 1 165 538 8:15 8.30 5 0 16 3 1 5 5 46 8 10 68 1 168 373 8:30 8:45 6 1 4 0 0 0 4 31 13 7 63 0 129 205 i8.45 9:00 4 0 5 0 0 0 2 15 10 3 37 0 76 76 PK HR TOTALS 48 1 50 3 0 4 10 213 54 55 299 3 740 2,821 PK HR FACTOR 0.83 0 83 0.83 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.76 0 76 0.76 0 76 0 76 0.76 TOTAL 76 2 92 6 1 11 23 346 100 88 528 5 1,278 NORTHBOUND ON SOUTHBOUND ON EASTBOUND ON WESTBOUND ON TIME PERIOD WORTH CROSSING WORTH CROSSING PROFFIT RD FROFFIT RD PEAK FROM TO L T R L T R L T R L T R TOTAL TOTAL 16:00 16:15 5 1 10 1 1 3 0 47 8- 6 42 1 125 679 16:15 16:30 9 3 20 0 2 0 2 55 14 8 35 0 148 750 16:30 16:45 19 3 26 3 1 3 5 50 15 19 61 1 206 811 16:45 17.00 11 1 20 1 1 5 2 70 14 13 60 2 200 835 17:00 17:15 22 1 20 4 0 1 0 68 11 8 61 0 196 823 17:15 17:30 18 0 17 0 0 2 1 71 20 17 63 0 209 627 � 17:30 17:45 18 0 23 2 0 1 2 69 28 12 74 1 230 418 17:45 18:00 17 0 22 0 0 2 3 60 15 14 55 0 188 188 18:00 18:15 10 1 25 2 2 1 0 53 13 13 50 0 170 560 18:15 18:30 3 0 12 1 0 2 0 55 9 4 55 0 141 390 18:30 18:45 6 0 12 0 0 0 0 57 7 10 37 1 130 249 18:45 19:00 3 0 32 0 0 0 0 36 6 10 32, 0 119 119 PK HR TOTALS 69 2 80 7 1 9 5 278 73 50 258 3 835 2,703 " PK HR FACTOR 0.88 0.88 0.88 0 61 0.61 0 61 0.90 0 90 0 90 0 89 0 89 0.89 - TOTAL 119 9 158 11 5 17 15 490 125 97 451 5 1,502 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT FORM COUNTY Albemarle LOCATION Rt 29&Airport Acres North DATE. 12/6/00 DAY OF WEEK Wednesday COUNTED BY S T INTERSECTION NUMBER COMMENTS NORTHBOUND ON SOUTHBOUND ON EASTBOUND ON TIME PERIOD RT 29 RT 29 AIRPORT ACRES PEAK FROM TO L T T R L R TOTAL TOTAL 6:00 6.15 8 88 197 12 0 0 305 1,939 6:15 6:30 11 128 428 7 0 0 574 2,356 6:30 6:45 9 197 367 5 1 2 581 2,380 6:45 7.00 9 149 320 1 0 0 479 2,394 7:00 7:15 2 107 609 1 0 3 722 2,606 7:15 7.30 4 92 495 5 0 2 598 2,422 7:30 7:45 3 167 423 1 0 1 595 2,353 7:45 8.00 9 255 414 9 0 4 691 2,311 8:00 8:15 10 140 380 8 0 0 538 1,698 8:15 8:30 6 161 351 8 1 2 529 1,160 8.30 8:45 10 161 369 12 1 0 553 631 8:45 9:00 2 39 37 0 0 0 78 78 PK HR TOTALS 18 621 1,941 16 0 10 2,606 9,692 PK HR FACTOR 0.61 0 61 0 80 0 80 0 63 0 63 TOTAL 46 1,122 3,078 44 2 12 4,304 NORTHBOUND ON SOUTHBOUND ON EASTBOUND ON TIME PERIOD RT 29 RT 29 AIRPORT ACRES PEAK FROM TO L T T R L R TOTAL TOTAL 16:00 16:15 7 359 235 3 1 2 607 3,498 16:15 16:30 7 531 326 4 0 1 869 3,909 16:30 16:45 5 569 413 6 0 0 993 3,866 16:45 17:00 5 600 413 10 0 1 1,029 3,751 17:00 17:15 5 542 457 10 2 2 1,018 3,709 17:15 17.30 4 445 369 8 0 0 826 2,691 17:30 17:45 3 497 368 8 1 1 878 1,865 17:45 18:00 8 412 561 6 0 0 987 987 18:00 18:15 2 264 261 2 0 0 529 1,972 18:15 18:30 5 287 199 3 1 3 498 1,443 18:30 18:45 3 266 270 2 0 2 543 945 18:45 19:00 1 209 176 10 2 4 402 402 PK HR TOTALS 22 2,242 1,609 30 2 4 3,909 15,235 PK HR FACTOR 0.94 0.94 0.88 0.88 0.38 0 38 TOTAL 44 3,955 3,142 55 4 7 7,207 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT FORM COUNTY Albemarle LOCATION Rt 29&Airport Acres South DATE: 12/6/00 DAY OF WEEK.Wednesday COUNTED BY: M H INTERSECTION NUMBER COMMENTS NORTHBOUND ON SOUTHBOUND ON EASTBOUND ON TIME PERIOD RT 29 RT 29 AIRPORT ACRES PEAK FROM TO L T T R L R TOTAL TOTAL 6:00 6:15 1 92 180 0 0 2 275 1,404 6:15 6:30 0 100 217 0 0 0 317 1,652 6:30 6:45 1 138 298 0 0 0 437 1,847 6:45 7:00 0 162 213 0 0 0 375 1,970 7:00 7:15 2 142 377 0 1 1 523 2,162 7:15 7:30 0 172 340 0 0 0 512 2,250 7.30 7:45 2 188 367 0 0 3 560 2,253 7.45 8.00 1 218 344 0 0 4 567 2,325 8.00 8:15 1 242 364 0 2 2 611 2,307 8.15 8 30 0 184 329 1 0 1 515 1,696 8 30 8:45 5 195 427 0 4 1 632 1,181 8.45 9.00 5 178 363 0 3 0 549 549 PK HR TOTALS 7 839 1,464 1 6 8 2,325 7,509 PK HR FACTOR 0.87 0 87 0 86 0.86 0.70 0 70 TOTAL 16 1,519 2,911 1 10 12 4,469 NORTHBOUND ON SOUTHBOUND ON EASTBOUND ON TIME PERIOD RT 29 RT 29 AIRPORT ACRES PEAK FROM TO L T T R L R TOTAL TOTAL 16.00 16:15 2 70 80 0 0 1 153 2,526 16:15 16:30 6 475 310 0 0 0 791 3,208 16:30 16:45 5 400 310 0 0 0 715 3,290 16:45 17:00 2 540 325 0 0 0 867 3,457 17:00 17:15 4 460 370 1 0 0 835 3,397 17:15 17:30 6 500 365 1 0 1 873 2,562 17:30 17:45 2 530 350 0 0 0 882 1,689 17:45 18:00 2 485 320 0 0 0 807 807 18 00 18:15 1 435 435 0 0 3 874 3,066 18:15 18:30 1 470 470 0 1 1 943 2,192 18:30 18:45 2 350 350 0 2 1 705 1,249 18:45 19.00 3 270 270 0 1 0 544 544 PK HR TOTALS 14 2,030 1,410 2 0 1 3,457 11,105 PK HR FACTOR 0.94 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.25, 0.25 TOTAL 29 3,460 2,430 2 0 2 5,923 APPENDIX B HIGHWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS HCS ANALYSIS: EXISTING TRAFFIC HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: WSA Inter.: Rout 29 and Airport/Proff it Agency: Albemarle Co, VA Area Type: All other areas Date: 1/4/01 Jurisd: Period: AM Peak 2000 Year . Project ID: North Point E/W St: Airport/Proffit N/S St: Route 29 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 LGConfig L TR L TR L T R L T R Volume 72 48 94 159 83 97 144 774 54 139 1394 69 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 15.0 17.0 18.0 50.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 226 1805 0.34 0.13 48.8 D TR 243 1712 0.62 0.14 53.1 D 51.7 D Westbound L 226 1805 0.74 0.13 62.7 E TR 247 1746 0.77 0.14 62.9 E 62.8 E Northbound L 271 1805 0.56 0.15 50.0 D T 1504 3610 0.54 0.42 26.8 C 29.9 C R 673 1615 0.08 0.42 21.2 C Southbound L 271 1805 0.54 0.15 49.3 D T 1504 3610 0.98 0.42 52.0 D 50.5 D R 673 1615 0.11 0.42 21.5 C Intersection Delay = 45.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: WSA Inter.: Rout 29 and Airport/Proffit Agency: Albemarle Co, VA Area Type: All other areas Date: 1/4/01 Jurisd: Period: PM Peak 2000 Year . Project ID: North Point E/W St: Airport/Proffit N/S St: Route 29 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 LGConfig L TR L TR L T R L T R Volume 189 128 157 93 77 182 203 1636 126 191 1288 91 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 13.0 15.0 15.0 57.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 196 1805 1.02 0.11 121.8 F TR 218 1743 1.38 0.13 247.9 F 197.6 F Westbound L 196 1805 0.50 0.11 52.4 D TR 213 1700 1.28 0.13 210.2 F 168.5 F Northbound L 226 1805 0.95 0.13 97.2 F T 1715 3610 1.00 0.47 54.2 D 56.3 E R 767 1615 0.17 0.47 18.1 B Southbound L 226 1805 0.89 0.13 83.9 F T 1715 3610 0.79 0.47 29.1 C 35.1 D R 767 1615 0.13 0.47 17.7 B Intersection Delay = 73.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = E HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak 2000 Intersection: Prof fit Rd and Worth Crossing Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: AM Peak 2000 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Prof fit Rd North/South Street: Worth Crossing Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 10 213 54 55 299 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 224 56 57 314 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 -- -- 1 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Yes Lanes 0 1 1 0 2 0 Configuration LT R LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 48 1 50 3 0 4 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 50 1 52 3 0 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LT I L TR I L TR v (vph) 10 57 50 53 3 4 C(m) (vph) 1247 1349 769 282 866 v/c 0.01 0.04 0.07 0.01 0.00 95% queue length 0.02 0.13 0.22 0.03 0.01 Control Delay 7.9 7.8 10.0+ 17.9 9.2 LOS A A B C A Approach Delay 12.9 Approach LOS B HCS2000• Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak 2000 Intersection: Proffit Rd and Worth Crossing Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: PM Peak 2000 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Proffit Rd North/South Street: Worth Crossing Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R 1 L T R Volume 5 278 73 50 258 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 292 76 52 271 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 -- -- 1 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Yes Lanes 0 1 1 0 2 0 Configuration LT R LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 69 2 80 7 10 9 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 72 2 84 7 10 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WE Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 ( 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LT ( L TR 1 L TR v (vph) 5 52 72 86 7 19 C(m) (vph) 1293 1274 694 253 502 v/c 0.00 0.04 0.12 0.03 0.04 95% queue length 0.01 0.13 0.42 0.09 0.12 Control Delay 7.8 7.9 10.9 19.6 12.5 LOS A A B C B Approach Delay 14.4 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak 2000 Intersection: Route 29 and Airport Acres (S) Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: AM Peak 2000 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Airport Acres North/South Street: Route 29 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R 1 L T R Volume 7 839 1464 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 884 1541 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 6 8 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L 1 1 LTR v (vph) 7 14 C(m) (vph) 436 v/c 0.02 95% queue length 0.05 Control Delay 13.4 LOS B Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co.: Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak 2000 Intersection: Route 29 and Airport Acres (S) Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Airport Acres North/South Street: Route 29 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 14 2030 1410 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 14 2135 1484 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 0 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (t) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I LTR v (vph) 14 1 C(m) (vph) 458 v/c 0.03 95t queue length 0.09 Control Delay 13.1 LOS B Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co.: Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak 2000 Intersection: Route 29 and Airport Acres (N) Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: AM Peak 2000 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Airport Acres North/South Street: Route 29 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 18 621 1941 16 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 652 2043 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 0 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L 1 1 LTR v (vph) 18 10 C(m) (vph) 276 v/c 0.07 95% queue length 0.21 Control Delay 19.0 LOS C Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co.: Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak 2000 Intersection: Route 29 and Airport Acres (N) Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: PM Peak 2000 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Airport Acres North/South Street: Route 29 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 22 2242 1609 30 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 23 2360 1693 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 2 4 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I l0 11 12 Lane Config L I I LTR v (vph) 23 6 C(m) (vph) 372 v/c 0.06 95t queue length 0.20 Control Delay 15.3 LOS C Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak 2000 Intersection: Route 29 and Cypress Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: AM Peak 2000 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Cypress North/South Street: Route 29 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 9 933 2018 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 9 984 2124 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 3 20 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L 1 I LTR v (vph) 9 24 C(m) (vph) 259 v/c 0.03 95% queue length 0.11 Control Delay 19.4 LOS C Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak 2000 Intersection: Route 29 and Cypress Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: PM Peak 2000 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Cypress North/South Street: Route 29 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 13 1951 1308 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 2063 1376 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 2 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 10 7 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (t) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I LTR v (vph) 13 17 C(m) (vph) 504 v/c 0.03 95t queue length 0.08 Control Delay 12.3 LOS B Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co.: Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak 2000 Intersection: Route 29 and Lewis & Clark Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: AM Peak 2000 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Lewis & Clark North/South Street: Route 29 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 222 870 2118 193 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 233 915 2229 203 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 29 21 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 30 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (U) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I L R v (vph) 233 30 22 C(m) (vph) 197 206 v/c 1.18 0.11 95% queue length 11.86 0.35 Control Delay 171.2 24.6 LOS F C Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak 2000 Intersection: Route 29 and Lewis & Clark Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: PM Peak 2000 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Lewis & Clark North/South Street: Route 29 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 26 21 1010 33 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.25 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 27 84 1063 34 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 252 241 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 265 253 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (t) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I 1 L R v (vph) 27 265 253 C(m) (vph) 644 257 497 v/c 0.04 1.03 0.51 95t queue length 0.13 10.48 2.85 Control Delay 10.8 106.9 19.5 LOS B F C Approach Delay 64.2 Approach LOS F HCS ANALYSIS : FUTURE BACKGROUND HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Inter. : Rout 29 and Airport/Proffit Agency: Albemarle Co, VA Area Type: All other areas Date: 1/4/01 Jurisd: Period: AM Peak 2010 Year : 2010 Project ID: North Point E/W St: Airport/Proffit N/S St: Route 29 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 LGConfig L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume 199 75 190 235 141 197 456 1869 80 215 2251 190 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right A EB Right A SB Right A WB Right A Green 12.0 14.0 24.0 50.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 181 1805 1.15 0.10 168.7 F T 421 3610 0.19 0.12 48.1 D 91.7 F R 579 1615 0.35 0.36 28.6 C Westbound L 181 1805 1.36 0.10 249.3 F T 222 1900 0.67 0.12 58.2 E 126.5 F R 579 1615 0.36 0.36 28.7 C Northbound L 361 1805 1.33 0.20 214.3 F T 2161 5187 0.91 0.42 39.2 D 71.5 E R 902 1615 0.09 0.56 12.4 B Southbound L 361 1805 0.63 0.20 47.3 D T 1504 3610 1.58 0.42 297.0 F 256.6 F R 902 1615 0.22 0.56 13.5 B Intersection Delay = 158.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: Inter. : Rout 29 and Airport/Proffit Agency: Albemarle Co, VA Area Type: All other areas Date: 1/4/01 Jurisd: Period: PM Peak 2010 Year : 2010 Project ID: North Point E/W St: Airport/Proffit N/S St: Route 29 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 LGConfig L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume 401 210 514 138 123 293 425 2738 186 341 2676 255 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right A EB Right A SB Right A WB Right A Green 15.0 17.0 18.0 50.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate _ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 226 1805 1.87 0.13 459.2 F T 511 3610 0.43 0.14 47.7 D 209.2 F R 538 1615 1.01 0.33 80.2 F Westbound L 226 1805 0.64 0.13 56.0 E T 269 1900 0.48 0.14 48.8 D 43.0 D R 538 1615 0.57 0.33 34.4 C Northbound L 271 1805 1.65 0.15 359.2 F T 2161 5187 1.33 0.42 188.4 F 200.3 F R 942 1615 0.21 0.58 12.0 B Southbound L 271 1805 1.32 0.15 220.5 F T 1504 3610 1.87 0.42 430.4 F 376.0 F R 942 1615 0.28 0.58 12.7 B Intersection Delay = 260.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak 2010 Intersection: Proffit Rd and Worth Crossing Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: AM Peak 2010 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Proffit Rd North/South Street: Worth Crossing Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 15 328 80 81 515 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 345 84 85 542 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 -- -- 1 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Yes Lanes 0 1 1 0 2 0 Configuration LT R LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 71 1 74 4 0 6 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 74 1 77 4 0 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (t) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level ofService Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LT I L TR I L TR v (vph) 15 85 74 78 4 6 C(m) (vph) 1026 1218 638 123 731 v/c 0.01 0.07 0.12 0.03 0.01 95t queue length 0.04 0.22 0.42 0.10 0.02 Control Delay 8.6 8.2 11.4 35.2 10.0- LOS A A B E A Approach Delay 20.1 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak 2010 Intersection: Prof fit Rd and Worth Crossing Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: PM Peak 2010 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Proffit Rd North/South Street: Worth Crossing Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 7 490 108 74 415 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 515 113 77 436 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 -- -- 1 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Yes Lanes 0 1 1 0 2 0 Configuration LT R LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 102 3 118 10 15 13 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 107 3 124 10 15 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (t) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LT 1 L TR 1 L TR v (vph) 7 77 107 127 10 28 C(m) (vph) 1123 1054 490 93 295 v/c 0.01 0.07 0.26 0.11 0.09 95% queue length 0.02 0.24 1.03 0.35 0.31 Control Delay 8.2 8.7 14.9 48.3 18.5 LOS A A B E C Approach Delay 26.3 Approach LOS D HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak 2010 Intersection: Route 29 and Airport Acres (S) Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: AM Peak 2010 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Airport Acres North/South Street: Route 29 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 10 2094 2306 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 2206 2427 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 9 8 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 9 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (t) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I LTR v (vph) 10 17 C(m) (vph) 198 v/c 0.05 95% queue length 0.16 Control Delay 24.1 LOS C Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak 2010 Intersection: Route 29 and Airport Acres (S) Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: PM Peak 2010 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Airport Acres North/South Street: Route 29 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 21 3378 3003 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 22 3554 3161 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 0 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I LTR v (vph) 22 1 C(m) (vph) 101 v/c 0.22 95% queue length 0.77 Control Delay 50.3 LOS F Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co.: Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak 2010 Intersection: Route 29 and Airport Acres (N) Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: AM Peak 2010 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Airport Acres North/South Street: Route 29 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 27 1771 3012 24 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 28 1859 3170 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 0 15 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (U) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I LTR v (vph) 28 15 C(m) (vph) 98 v/c 0.29 95% queue length 1.07 Control Delay 55.8 LOS F Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co.: Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak 2010 Intersection: Route 29 and Airport Acres (N) Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: PM Peak 2010 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Airport Acres North/South Street: Route 29 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 33 3692 3297 44 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 34 3886 3470 46 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 3 6 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L 1 1 LTR v (vph) 34 9 C(m) (vph) 73 v/c 0.47 95% queue length 1.89 Control Delay 91.5 LOS F Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak 2010 Intersection: Route 29 and Cypress Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: AM Peak 2010 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Cypress North/South Street: Route 29 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 13 2233 3126 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 2355 3290 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb . RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 4 30 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I LTR v (vph) 13 35 C(m) (vph) 89 v/c 0.15 95% queue length 0.49 Control Delay 52.2 LOS F Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak 2010 Intersection: Route 29 and Cypress Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: PM Peak 2010 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Cypress North/South Street: Route 29 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R 1 L T R Volume 19 3261 2852 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 20 3449 3002 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 15 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L 1 I LTR v (vph) 20 25 C(m) (vph) 117 v/c 0.17 95% queue length 0.59 II Control Delay 42.0 LOS E Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: WSA Inter. : Rout 29 and Lewis & Clark Agency: Albemarle Co, VA Area Type: All other areas Date: 1/4/01 Jurisd: Period: AM Peak 2010 Year . Project ID: North Point E/W St: Lewis & Clark N/S St: Route 29 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 1 LGConfig L R L T T R Volume 103 95 1127 1288 3134 580 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru Thru A A Right A Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru A Right Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 10.0 27.0 68.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 292 3502 0.37 0.08 52.8 D 53.1 D R 237 2842 0.42 0.08 53.5 D Westbound Northbound L 788 3502 1.51 0.22 280.4 F T 3008 3610 0.45 0.83 2.8 A 132.3 F Southbound T 2046 3610 1.61 0.57 303.9 F 259.5 F R 915 1615 0.67 0.57 20.0+ C Intersection Delay = 204.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: WSA Inter. : Rout 29 and Lewis & Clark Agency: Albemarle Co, VA Area Type: All other areas Date: 1/4/01 Jurisd: Period: PM Peak 2010 Year . Project ID: North Point E/W St: Lewis & Clark N/S St: Route 29 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 1 LGConfig L R L T T R Volume 1672 1169 405 2504 1495 184 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru Thru A A Right A Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru A Right Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 40.0 25.0 40.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 1167 3502 1.51 0.33 273.2 F 235.9 F R 947 2842 1.30 0.33 182.7 F Westbound Northbound L 730 3502 0.58 0.21 44.0 D T 2106 3610 1.25 0.58 142.4 F 128.7 F Southbound T 1203 3610 1.31 0.33 184.9 F 167.9 F R 538 1615 0.36 0.33 30.7 C Intersection Delay = 178.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F HCS ANALYSIS : INTERNAL INTERSECTIONS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 3/30/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Intersection: Road A and Road B Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Norh Point East/West Street: Road B North/South Street: Road A Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 12 9 22 7 15 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 12 9 23 7 15 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 72 18 9 36 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 75 18 9 37 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (U) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LR 1 LR v (vph) 12 7 93 46 C(m) (vph) 1611 1593 932 1042 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.10 0.04 95% queue length 0.02 0.01 0.33 0.14 Control Delay 7.3 7.3 9.3 8.6 LOS A A A A Approach Delay 9.3 8.6 Approach LOS A A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Date Performed: 3/30/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: Road A and Road B Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Norh Point East/West Street: Road B North/South Street: Road A Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 38 18 74 25 14 13 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 40 18 77 26 14 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 45 11 6 22 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 47 11 6 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LR I LR v (vph) 40 26 58 29 C(m) (vph) 1600 1512 803 996 v/c 0.03 0.02 0.07 0.03 95% queue length 0.08 0.05 0.23 0.09 Control Delay 7.3 7.4 9.8 8.7 LOS A A A A Approach Delay 9.8 8.7 Approach LOS A A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Date Performed: 3/30/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Intersection: Road A and Road C Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Norh Point East/West Street: Road C North/South Street: Road A Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 3 51 1 5 140 14 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 53 1 5 147 14 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 1 6 73 18 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 6 76 18 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LR I LR v (vph) 3 5 7 94 C(m) (vph) 1430 1564 1005 787 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.12 95% queue length 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.41 Control Delay 7.5 7.3 8.6 10.2 LOS A A A B Approach Delay 8.6 10.2 Approach LOS A B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Date Performed: 3/30/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Intersection: Road A and Road C Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Norh Point East/West Street: Road C North/South Street: Road A Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 18 165 2 8 93 70 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 173 2 8 97 73 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 2 7 34 9 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 7 35 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (V) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LR I LR v (vph) 18 8 9 44 C(m) (vph) 1420 1414 868 739 v/c 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.06 95% queue length 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.19 Control Delay 7.6 7.6 9.2 10.2 LOS A A A B Approach Delay 9.2 10.2 Approach LOS A B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Date Performed: 3/30/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Intersection: Road A and Condo Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Norh Point East/West Street: Condo North/South Street: Road A Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 4 38 122 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 40 128 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 5 19 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 20 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ( 7 8 9 ( 10 11 12 Lane Config L I 1 LR v (vph) 4 25 C(m) (vph) 1469 955 v/c 0.00 0.03 95% queue length 0.01 0.08 Control Delay 7.5 8.9 LOS A A Approach Delay 8.9 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Date Performed: 3/30/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: Road A and Condo Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Norh Point East/West Street: Condo North/South Street: Road A Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 17 127 75 6 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 17 133 78 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 2 9 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L 1 i LR v (vph) 17 11 C(m) (vph) 1526 977 v/c 0.01 0.01 95% queue length 0.03 0.03 Control Delay 7.4 8.7 LOS A A Approach Delay 8.7 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Date Performed: 3/30/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Intersection: Road A and Road D Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Norh Point East/West Street: Road D North/South Street: Road A Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 34 2 7 38 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 35 2 7 40 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 13 20 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (t) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L ( I L R v (vph) 35 13 21 C(m) (vph) 1573 885 1054 v/c 0.02 0.01 0.02 95t queue length 0.07 0.04 0.06 Control Delay 7.3 9.1 8.5 LOS A A A Approach Delay 8.7 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Date Performed: 3/30/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Intersection: Road A and Road D Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Norh Point East/West Street: Road D North/South Street: Road A Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 27 8 4 24 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 28 8 4 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 43 47 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 45 49 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (t) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SE Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I L R v (vph) 28 45 49 C(m) (vph) 1597 911 1069 v/c 0.02 0.05 0.05 95t queue length 0.05 0.16 0.14 Control Delay 7.3 9.2 8.5 LOS A A A Approach Delay 8.8 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Date Performed: 3/30/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Intersection: Road A and Road El Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Norh Point East/West Street: Road El North/South Street: Road A Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 133 83 35 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 140 87 36 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 24 109 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 25 114 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach ER WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I L R v (vph) 140 25 114 C(m) (vph) 1575 549 1036 v/c 0.09 0.05 0.11 95% queue length 0.29 0.14 0.37 Control Delay 7.5 11.9 8.9 LOS A B A Approach Delay 9.4 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Date Performed: 3/30/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: Road A and Road El Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Norh Point East/West Street: Road El North/South Street: Road A Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 317 163 202 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 333 171 212 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 65 319 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 68 335 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L 1 1 L R v (vph) 333 68 335 C(m) (vph) 1359 190 828 v/c 0.25 0.36 0.40 95% queue length 0.97 1.52 1.98 Control Delay 8.5 34.1 12.3 LOS A D B Approach Delay 16.0 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Date Performed: 3/30/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Intersection: Road A and Road E2 Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Norh Point East/West Street: Road E2 North/South Street: Road A Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 62 38 43 6 69 84 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 65 40 45 6 72 88 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 21 4 13 19 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 22 4 13 20 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (t) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LR I LR v (vph) 65 6 26 33 C(m) (vph) 1432 1524 723 857 v/c 0.05 0.00 0.04 0.04 95t queue length 0.14 0.01 0.11 0.12 Control Delay 7.6 7.4 10.2 9.4 LOS A A B A Approach Delay 10.2 9.4 Approach LOS B A • IIHCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Date Performed: 3/30/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Intersection: Road A and Road E2 Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Norh Point East/West Street: Road E2 North/South Street: Road A Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 75 86 123 20 66 17 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 78 90 129 21 69 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 Configuration L T R L T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 122 22 77 110 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 128 23 81 115 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LR I LR v (vph) 78 21 151 196 C(m) (vph) 1523 1362 559 781 v/c 0.05 0.02 0.27 0.25 95% queue length 0.16 0.05 1.09 0.99 Control Delay 7.5 7.7 13.8 11.1 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 13.8 11.1 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 3/30/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Intersection: Road A and Road E3 Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Norh Point East/West Street: E3 North/South Street: Road A Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 116 13 43 98 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 122 13 45 103 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No _ Lanes 1 2 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 29 115 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 30 121 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I L R v (vph) 122 30 121 C(m) (vph) 1446 621 1056 v/c 0.08 0.05 0.11 95% queue length 0.28 0.15 0.39 Control Delay 7.7 11.1 8.8 LOS A B A Approach Delay 9.3 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY I Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Date Performed: 3/30/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: Road A and Road E3 Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Norh Point East/West Street: E3 North/South Street: Road A Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 161 46 24 60 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 169 48 25 63 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 2 1 i Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ( 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 99 147 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 104 154 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L 1 I L R v (vph) 169 104 154 C(m) (vph) 1520 528 1072 v/c 0.11 0.20 0.14 95% queue length 0.37 0.73 0.50 Control Delay 7.7 13.5 8.9 LOS A B A Approach Delay 10.8 Approach LOS B I HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 3/30/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Intersection: Road E2 and Office/Shop Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Norh Point East/West Street: Road E2 North/South Street: Office/Shop Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R i Volume 42 4 20 20 28 98 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 44 4 21 21 29 103 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 13 13 15 7 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 13 15 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LT I LR I LR v (vph) 44 21 26 22 C(m) (vph) 1466 1603 894 772 v/c 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.03 95% queue length 0.09 0.04 0.09 0.09 Il Control Delay 7.5 7.3 9.1 9.8 LOS A A A A Approach Delay 9.1 9.8 Approach LOS A A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Date Performed: 3/30/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: Road E2 and Office/Shop Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Norh Point i East/West Street: Road E2 North/South Street: Office/Shop Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 8 26 67 67 6 20 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 27 70 70 6 21 I/ Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 72 72 90 38 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 75 75 94 40 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? _ Lanes 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LT 1 LR 1 LR v (vph) 8 70 150 134 C(m) (vph) 1600 1509 806 763 v/c 0.00 0.05 0.19 0.18 95% queue length 0.02 0.15 0.68 0.63 Control Delay 7.3 7.5 10.5 10.7 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 10.5 10.7 Approach LOS B B II HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Date Performed: 3/30/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Intersection: Office and Road E3 Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Norh Point East/West Street: E3 North/South Street: Road A Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 132 119 24 190 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 138 125 25 200 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 1 2 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 61 12 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 64 1'2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I LR v (vph) 25 76 C(m) (vph) 1313 707 v/c 0.02 0.11 95% queue length 0.06 0.36 Control Delay 7.8 10.7 LOS A B Approach Delay 10.7 Approach LOS B I IHCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Date Performed: 3/30/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak II Intersection: Office and Road E3 Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Norh Point East/West Street: E3 North/South Street: Road A Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 ' Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 II L T R I L T R Volume 209 138 28 193 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 220 145 29 203 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 1 2 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 182 37 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 II Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 191 38 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 IConfiguration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach ER WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 ( 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I LR v (vph) 29 229 C(m) (vph) 1205 625 v/c 0.02 0.37 95% queue length 0.07 1.68 Control Delay 8.1 14.1 LOS A B Approach Delay 14.1 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Date Performed: 3/30/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Intersection: Shop and Southern Entrance Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: Project ID: Norh Point East/West Street: Shop North/South Street: Southern Entr Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 ( 4 5 6 II L T R I L T R Volume 180 32 158 31 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 189 33 166 32 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 0 2 1 Configuration TR T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 15 15 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 1 Configuration R R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config 1 R 1 R v (vph) 15 15 C(m) (vph) 807 966 v/c 0.02 0.02 95% queue length 0.06 0.05 Control Delay 9.5 8.8 LOS A A Approach Delay 9.5 8.8 Approach LOS A A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 3/30/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Intersection: Shop and Southern Entrance Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Norh Point East/West Street: Shop North/South Street: Southern Entr Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 II L T R I L T R Volume 339 80 433 105 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 356 84 455 110 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 2 0 Configuration TR T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 87 86 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 91 90 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 1 Configuration R R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I R I R v (vph) 91 90 C(m) (vph) 607 721 v/c 0.15 0.12 95% queue length 0.52 0.43 Control Delay 12.0 10.7 LOS B B Approach Delay 12.0 10.7 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: WSA Inter. : Rd El and Outparcels Agency: Albemarle County Area Type: All other areas Date: 3/30/01 Jurisd: Period: AM Peak Year . Project ID: E/W St: Rd El N/S St: Out Parcels SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 LGConfig L T T R L R Volume 205 159 63 60 38 132 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A NB Left Thru A Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left A Thru A Thru Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 12.0 26.0 32.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 80.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 637 1805 0.36 0.48 13.2 B T 1173 3610 0.14 0.32 19.2 B 15.7 B Westbound T 1173 3610 0.06 0.32 18.6 B 18.8 B R 525 1615 0.12 0.32 19.1 B Northbound Southbound L 722 1805 0.06 0.40 14.8 B 15.7 B R 646 1615 0.22 0.40 15.9 B Intersection Delay = 16.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: WSA Inter. . Rd El and Outparcels Agency: Albemarle County Area Type: All other areas Date: 3/30/01 Jurisd: Period: PM Peak Year . Project ID: E/W St: Rd El N/S St. Out Parcels SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 LGConfig L T T R L R Volume 334 484 365 126 127 383 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A NB Left Thru A Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left A Thru A Thru Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 10.0 28.0 32.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 80.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 513 1805 0.72 0.47 19.3 B T 1263 3610 0.40 0.35 19.9 B 19.6 B Westbound T 1263 3610 0.30 0.35 19.0 B 18.9 B R 565 1615 0.24 0.35 18.6 B Northbound Southbound L 722 1805 0.19 0.40 15.7 B 19.7 B R 646 1615 0.62 0.40 21.1 C Intersection Delay = 19.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: WSA Inter. Rd El and Southern Entrance Agency: Albemarle County Area Type- All other areas Date: 3/30/01 Jurisd: Period: AM Peak Year . Project ID: E/W St: Rd El N/S St: Southern Entrance SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 2 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 LGConfig T R L T L R Volume 96 93 96 48 75 120 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left A Thru A Thru Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left Thru A Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 15.0 15.0 15.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 60.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound T 903 3610 0.11 0.25 17.4 B 17.8 B R 404 1615 0.24 0.25 18.3 B Westbound L 451 1805 0.22 0.25 18.1 B T 903 3610 0.06 0.25 17.1 B 17 8 B Northbound L 451 1805 0.18 0.25 17.8 B 18.4 B R 404 1615 0.31 0.25 18.7 B Southbound Intersection Delay = 18.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: WSA Inter. - Rd El and Southern Entrance Agency: Albemarle County Area Type: All other areas Date: 3/30/01 Jurisd: Period: PM Peak Year Project ID: E/W St: Rd El N/S St: Southern Entrance SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 2 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 LGConfig T R L T L R Volume 268 315 223 278 213 212 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left A Thru A Thru Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A A SB Left Thru A Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WE Right Green 12.0 27.0 31.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 80.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound T 1218 3610 0.23 0.34 19.1 B 21.8 C R 545 1615 0.61 0.34 24.1 C Westbound L 591 1805 0.40 0.49 12.7 B T 1218 3610 0.24 0.34 19.2 B 16.3 B Northbound L 699 1805 0.32 0.39 17.4 B 17.6 B R 626 1615 0.36 0.39 17.8 B Southbound Intersection Delay = 18.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS ANALYSIS : FUTURE TOTAL (BACKGROUND + SITE) HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: WSA Inter : Rout 29 and Airport/Proff it Agency: Albemarle Co, VA Area Type: All other areas Date: 1/4/01 Jurisd: Period: AM Peak 2010 Year : 2010 Project ID: North Point E/W St: Airport/Proffit N/S St: Route 29 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 LGConfig L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume 252 99 190 267 177 215 456 2234 132 242 2704 234 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right A EB Right A SB Right A WB Right A Green 12.0 14.0 24.0 50.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (a) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 181 1805 1.46 0.10 290.5 F T 421 3610 0.25 0.12 48.5 D 154.2 F R 579 1615 0.35 0.36 28.6 C Westbound L 181 1805 1.55 0.10 328.0 F T 222 1900 0.84 0.12 75.5 E 162.8 F R 579 1615 0.39 0.36 29.2 C Northbound L 361 1805 1.33 0.20 214.3 F T 2161 5187 1.09 0.42 83.2 F 101.1 F R 902 1615 0.15 0.56 12.9 B Southbound L 361 1805 0.71 0.20 50.9 D T 1504 3610 1.89 0.42 439.1 F 378.2 F R 902 1615 0.27 0.56 14.0 B Intersection Delay = 233.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F I HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: WSA Inter. : Rout 29 and Airport/Proff it Agency: Albemarle Co, VA Area Type: All other areas Date: 1/4/01 Jurisd Period: PM Peak 2010 Year : 2010 Project ID: North Point E/W St: Airport/Proffit N/S St: Route 29 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 LGConfig L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume 491 259 514 300 185 303 425 3353 353 402 2756 353 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right A EB Right A SB Right A WB Right A Green 15.0 17.0 18.0 50.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 226 1805 2.29 0.13 645.7 F T 511 3610 0.53 0.14 48.9 D 293.5 F R 538 1615 1.01 0.33 80.2 F Westbound L 226 1805 1.40 0.13 256.3 F T 269 1900 0.72 0.14 58.6 E 124.8 F R 538 1615 0.59 0.33 35.0- C Northbound L 271 1805 1.65 0.15 359.2 F T 2161 5187 1.63 0.42 322.0 F 299.5 F R 942 1615 0.39 0.58 13.8 B Southbound L 271 1805 1.56 0.15 320.7 F T 1504 3610 1.93 0.42 455.5 F 395.6 F R 942 1615 0.39 0.58 13.8 B Intersection Delay = 319.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co.: Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak 2010 Intersection: Proffit Rd and Worth Crossing Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: AM Peak 2010 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Proffit Rd North/South Street: Worth Crossing Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 91 333 80 81 533 80 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 95 350 84 85 561 84 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 -- -- 1 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Yes Lanes 0 1 1 0 2 0 Configuration LT R LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 71 41 74 57 34 74 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 74 43 77 60 35 77 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 ( 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LT ( L TR I L TR v (vph) 95 85 74 120 60 112 C(m) (vph) 943 1213 257 55 293 v/c 0.10 0.07 0.47 1.09 0.38 95% queue length 0.34 0.23 2.31 5.07 1.72 Control Delay 9.2 8.2 30.7 271.3 24.7 LOS A A D F C Approach Delay 110.7 Approach LOS F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak 2010 Intersection: Proffit Rd and Worth Crossing Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: PM Peak 2010 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Proffit Rd North/South Street: Worth Crossing Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 214 511 108 74 425 134 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 225 537 113 77 447 141 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 -- -- 1 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Yes Lanes 0 1 1 0 2 0 Configuration LT R LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 102 71 118 158 68 207 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 107 74 124 166 71 217 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB NB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LT I L TR I L TR v (vph) 225 77 107 198 166 288 C(m) (vph) 990 1034 124 0 196 v/c 0.23 0.07 1.60 1.47 95% queue length 0.87 0.24 14.40 17.63 Control Delay 9.7 8.8 365.5 281.6 LOS A A F F F Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: WSA Inter : Proffit and Worth Crossing Agency: Albemarle County Area Type- All other areas Date: 3/30/01 Jurisd: Period: AM Peak Year . Project ID: E/W St: Proffit Rd N/S St: Worth Crossing SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 LGConfig L T R L T R L TR LT R Volume 91 333 80 81 533 80 71 41 74 56 31 71 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 . RTOR Vol 0 0 15 15 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 17.0 36.0 17.0 19.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 110.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 279 1805 0.34 0.15 42.3 D T 622 1900 0.56 0.33 31.7 C 32.8 C R 529 1615 0.16 0.33 26.4 C Westbound L 279 1805 0.30 0.15 41.9 D T 622 1900 0.90 0.33 51.7 D 47.7 D R 529 1615 0.16 0.33 26.4 C Northbound L 279 1805 0.27 0.15 41.5 D TR 268 1732 0.39 0.15 42.8 D 42.3 D Southbound LT 318 1841 0.29 0.17 40.1 D 39.9 D R 279 1615 0.21 0.17 39.4 D Intersection Delay = 41.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: WSA Inter. : Proffit and Worth Crossing Agency: Albemarle County Area Type: All other areas Date: 3/30/01 Jurisd: Period: PM Peak Year • Project ID: E/W St: Proffit Rd N/S St: Worth Crossing SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 LGConfig L T R L T R L TR LT R Volume 214 511 108 74 425 134 102 71 118 158 68 207 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 .0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 15 15 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 19.0 35.0 16.0 19.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 110.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 312 1805 0.72 0.17 50.9 D T 605 1900 0.89 0.32 50.8 D 47.8 D R 514 1615 0.22 0.32 27.7 C Westbound L 312 1805 0.25 0.17 39.8 D T 605 1900 0.74 0.32 38.2 D 36.3 D R 514 1615 0.27 0.32 28.3 C Northbound L 263 1805 0.41 0.15 43.7 D TR 252 1732 0.73 0.15 54.9 D 50.8 D Southbound LT 317 1836 0.75 0.17 52.9 D 52.5 D R 279 1615 0.72 0.17 52.0 D Intersection Delay = 45.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak 2010 Intersection: Route 29 and Airport Acres (S) Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: AM Peak 2010 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Airport Acres North/South Street: Route 29 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 10 2624 2672 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 2762 2812 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 9 8 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 9 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I LTR v (vph) 10 17 C(m) (vph) 139 v/c 0.07 95% queue length 0.23 Control Delay 32.9 LOS D Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak 2010 Intersection: Route 29 and Airport Acres (S) Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: PM Peak 2010 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Airport Acres North/South Street: Route 29 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R 1 L T R Volume 21 4274 3785 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 22 4498 3984 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 0 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L 1 I LTR v (vph) 22 1 C(m) (vph) 47 v/c 0.47 95% queue length 1.71 Control Delay 136.4 LOS F Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak 2010 Intersection: Route 29 and Airport Acres (N) Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: AM Peak 2010 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Airport Acres North/South Street: Route 29 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R 1 L T R Volume 27 1977 260 104 3255 24 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 28 2081 273 109 3426 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 Configuration L T R L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 123 69 0 15 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 129 72 0 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LR 1 LTR v (vph) 28 109 201 15 C(m) (vph) 77 211 v/c 0.36 0.52 95% queue length 1.40 2.65 Control Delay 76.4 39.0 LOS F E Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak 2010 Intersection: Route 29 and Airport Acres (N) Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: PM Peak 2010 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Airport Acres North/South Street: Route 29 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 33 4013 492 326 3605 44 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 34 4224 517 343 3794 46 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 0 Configuration L T R L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 445 303 3 6 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 468 318 3 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration L R LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L R 1 LTR v (vph) 34 343 468 318 9 C(m) (vph) 54 23 43 v/c 0.63 14.91 7.40 95% queue length 2.53 42.99 37.55 Control Delay 149.1 LOS F F F Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: WSA Inter. : Route 29 and Lower Agency: WSA Area Type: All other areas Date: 5/23/01 Jurisd: Period: AM Peak Year : 2010 Project T^: ^7r,-thDoint E/W St: - N/S St: Rotue 29 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 LGConfig LTR L TR L T R L T R Volume 0 5 15 123 5 77 27 1977 229 104 3255 24 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 15.0 20.0 60.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 110.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 233 1705 0.09 0.14 41.7 D 41.7 D Westbound L 328 1805 0.39 0.18 40.4 D TR 297 1632 0.29 0.18 39.4 D 40.0 D Northbound L 0.55 T 1969 3610 1.06 0.55 62.3 E R 881 1615 0.27 0.55 13.5 B Southbound L 69 127 1.58 0.55 344.0 F T 1969 3610 1.74 0.55 360.1 F 357.2 F R 881 1615 0.03 0.55 11.6 B Intersection Delay = (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: WSA Inter.: Route 29 and Lower Agency: WSA Area Type: All other areas Date: 5/23/01 Jurisd: Period: PM Peak Year : 2010 Project ID: Northpoirt E/W St: . __ _• N/S St: Rotue 29 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 LGConfig LTR L TR L T R L T R Volume 3 3 6 474 5 303 33 4013 394 286 3605 44 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 14.0 48.0 53.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 130.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 188 1750 0.06 0.11 52.3 D 52.3 D Westbound L 666 1805 0.75 0.37 40.5 D TR 598 1619 0.54 0.37 33.3 C 37.7 D Northbound L 0.41 T 1472 3610 2.87 0.41 881.7 F R 658 1615 0.63 0.41 32.7 C Southbound L 0.41 T 1472 3610 2.58 0.41 750.6 F R 658 1615 0.07 0.41 23.5 C Intersection Delay = (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4 1 Analyst: WSA Inter. . Rout 29 and Business Entrance Agency: Albemarle Co, VA Area Type: All other areas Date: 1/4/01 Jurisd: Period: AM Peak 2010 Year . Project ID: North Point E/W St: Business Entrance N/S St- Route 29 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 1 1 2 0 LGConfig L T R T R L T Volume 206 10 45 2388 216 59 3297 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru A Right Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 14.0 76.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound L 253 1805 0.86 0.14 66.2 E T 266 1900 0.04 0.14 37.3 D 60.3 E R 226 1615 0.21 0.14 38.5 D Northbound T 2744 3610 0.92 0.76 14.9 B 14.0 B R 1227 1615 0.19 0.76 3.4 A Southbound L 76 100 0.82 0.76 55.1 E T 2744 3610 1.26 0.76 134.3 F 132.9 F Intersection Delay = 80.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: WSA Inter.: Rout 29 and Business Entrance Agency. Albemarle Co, VA Area Type: All other areas Date: 1/4/01 Jurisd: Period: PM Peak 2010 Year Project ID: North Point E/W St: Business Entrance N/S St: Route 29 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 1 1 2 0 LGConfig L T R T R L T Volume 285 10 90 3633 312 105 3171 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru A Right Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 14.0 76.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound L 253 1805 1.19 0.14 159.3 F T 266 1900 0.04 0.14 37.3 D 128.2 F R 226 1615 0.42 0.14 40.6 D Northbound T 2744 3610 1.39 0.76 191.4 F 176.6 F R 1227 1615 0.27 0.76 3.7 A Southbound L 0.76 T 2744 3610 1.22 0.76 113.0 F Intersection Delay = (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak 2010 Intersection: Route 29 and Cypress Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: AM Peak 2010 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Cypress North/South Street: Route 29 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 13 2370 3313 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 2494 3487 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 4 30 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I LTR v (vph) 13 35 C(m) (vph) 74 v/c 0.18 95% queue length 0.59 Control Delay 63.7 LOS F Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: WSA Agency/Co. : Albemarle Co, VA Date Performed: 1/4/01 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak 2010 Intersection: Route 29 and Cypress Jurisdiction: Analysis Year: PM Peak 2010 Project ID: North Point East/West Street: Cypress North/South Street: Route 29 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R 1 L T R Volume 19 3702 3200 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 20 3916 3368 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 15 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L 1 1 LTR v (vph) 20 25 C(m) (vph) 83 v/c 0.24 95% queue length 0.86 Control Delay 61.6 LOS F Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: WSA Inter. : Rout 29 and Lewis & Clark Agency: Albemarle Co, VA Area Type: All other areas _ Date: 1/4/01 Jurisd: Period: AM Peak 2010 Year . Project ID: North Point E/W St: Lewis & Clark N/S St: Route 29 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 2 0 2 1 0 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 LGConfig L R L R L T R L T R Volume 103 209 37 35 1142 1396 19 14 3284 580 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru Thru A A Right A Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru A Right Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 10.0 35.0 60.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 292 3502 0.37 0.08 52.8 D 80.4 F R 237 2842 0.93 0.08 94.0 F Westbound L 0.00 R 0 1615 0.00 Northbound L 1021 3502 1.18 0.29 132.6 F T 3008 3610 0.49 0.83 2.9 A R 0 1615 0.00 Southbound L 0.00 T 1805 3610 1.92 0.50 443.9 F R 808 1615 0.76 0.50 28.2 C Intersection Delay = (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: WSA Inter. : Rout 29 and Lewis & Clark Agency: Albemarle Co, VA Area Type: All other areas Date: 1/4/01 Jurisd: Period: PM Peak 2010 Year . Project ID: North Point E/W St: Lewis & Clark N/S St: Route 29 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 2 0 2 1 0 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 LGConfig L R L R L T R L T R Volume 1672 1205 23 28 440 2862 51 29 1820 184 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru Thru A A Right A Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru A Right Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 40.0 25.0 40.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 1167 3502 1.51 0.33 273.2 F 242.4 F R 947 2842 1.34 0.33 199.7 F Westbound L 0.00 R 0 1615 0.00 Northbound L 730 3502 0.63 0.21 45.1 D T 2106 3610 1.43 0.58 221.6 F R 0 1615 0.00 Southbound L 0.00 T 1203 3610 1.59 0.33 310.7 F R 538 1615 0.36 0.33 30.7 C Intersection Delay = (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = GREAT EASTERN MANAGEMENT COMPANY . DEVELOPMENT • CONSTRUCTION III FINANCE II MANAGEMENT Hand Delivery September 21, 2001 Mrs. Elaine Echols Albemarle County Planning Department County Office Building 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 Re: Traffic Impact Study North Pointe Development Dear Elaine: I am pleased to enclose herewith five (5) copies of the Traffic Impact Study for our North Pointe development. I trust that you will forward appropriate copies to VDOT. As I believe Chuck discussed with you recently,the next step from our perspective is to allow appropriate time (which we hope will be relatively short!) for VDOT to review and digest the detail and recommendations contained in the Study and then schedule a meeting for VDOT to communicate back to us and to the County the results of its review. With North Pointe,we need to first agree with VDOT and the County on the requested improvements to the existing road network (which we would expect to include as proffers to our application) and then to also agree on the general location for the internal road network. Once these issues are behind us,we can address with the County other known issues such as critical slopes,piping and filling the stream area, construction of our proposed lake amenity, community infrastructure needs (some of which we would also expect to proffer) and, perhaps, densities. From that point, we will then be in a position to work on details of land planning and the other important information which will be needed during the public hearing process. As I believe we may have already told you, we have contracted with Integra/Rountrey & Associates (Cecil Sears)to prepare an economic impact study. We are looking forward to working with you and the County on this development and please feel free to call me any time you have any questions. Yours Truly, )47+17)/%tt, Donald J. Wagner `\' DW/dj a_ Enclosures 0 cc: V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning(w/o enclosure) Joseph T. Wallace(w/o enclosure) Robert W. Tucker,Jr.,County Executive(w/o enclosures and for information only) I j► o G\DOCS\WP\TOWERSLT\Rezoning\CountyStaft\EcholsTrafficStudySub wpd September 21,2001(11 37am) PO Box 5526 III CHARLOTTESVILLE,VIRGINIA 22905-5526 • GENERAL OFFICE (434) 296-4141 II PROPERTY MANAGEMENT (434) 296-4109 ■ FACSIMILE (434) 293-5197 II s nal SEP 2 fi 1kH 9: 08 ENG Ey P W