The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSUB202000082 Approval - County 2021-10-26� AI �h �lRGIN�P COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 Project title: Project file number: Plan preparer: Owner or rep.: Date Received: Rev. 1 Received: Rev. 2 Received: Rev. 3 Received: Rev. 4 Received: Rev. 5 Received: Date of comments: Rev. 1 Comments: Rev. 2 Comments: Rev. 3 Comments: Rev.4 Comments: Approval: Scott, Road and Drainage plan review Brookhill Blocks 9, 10, & 11 - Road Plans Collins Engineering [scott@collins-engineering.com] Riverbend Management [alan@riverbenddev.com] 29 April 2020 17 July 2020 27 Oct. 2020 12 Jan 2021 12 May 2021 15 Oct 2021 08 June 2020 27 Aug 2020 03 Dec 2020 19 Feb 2021 15 June 2021 26 Oct 2021 The above referenced road plans are approved. The next step is to post the bond. I will review the bond estimate that was submitted and send the amount to Ana soon. Engineering (Emily Cox) 1. WPO Plan must be approved before road plan can be approved. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 2. Please add SUB202000082 to the cover sheet. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 3. [Sheet 2] General note 1 says there is no floodplain on site, however, there is floodplain shown in the southern comer of the property. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 4. Ensure all road cross sections match the plan view. For one example, Sheet 13 shows Flora Court as 49ft R/W, however, the dimension shown measures a 52ft R/W. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 5. Ensure all road cross sections match the requirements of the code of development. See planning comments for more detail. Rev. 1: Comment not addressed. See planning comment 27. Rev. 2: Comment addressed. 6. [Sheet 5] Entrance radius into Flora Court should be a minimum of 25 ft. Currently, 15ft. is shown. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 7. [Sheet 5] Radius of cul-de-sac on the northern end of Koch Court should be a minimum of 45ft. Currently, 30 ft. is shown. A 30 ft radius can be allowed with a 30 ft. face of curb to face of curb road width. However, this is a public VDOT road, so must be coordinated with VDOT. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 8. Ensure all necessary pavement markings are shown. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 9. [Sheets 28&29] Please show the storm drain and any other utilities on the landscaping sheet. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. 10. [Sheet 9] Please provide back up for the preserved slopes note shown below. (an email, an exhibit 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. Engineering Review Comments Page 2 of 3 or Survcc plan number or date) -�// S G8 i I 454 LIMITS OFEXISTING ALBEMARLE COUNTY PRESERVED STEEP SLOPES 4�449 BW HAVE BEEN DETERMINED TO BE LESS THAN 25%BASED ON NEW 1449 EG TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER, AS PERMITTED UNDER SECTION 30.7.4(b)h — — - i PROPOSED WALL (MAX. HT. = 5') R. Ice the date(of signed seal) and title of the exhibit on this note. Rev. 2: The slope exhibit and this plan should clearly show current county preserved slope limits vs. proposed new preserved slope limits based on survey. Rev. 3: Comment addressed. Although this is a road plan, please note that retaining walls that cross lot lines will need to be in an easement and there must be a maintenance agreement. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. [Sheet 9] Ensure all drainage easements are shown. Pipes 3 and 1 appear to need an easement. Also, the SWM facility easement is not shown. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. [Lot 57] Please label the sight distance easement that is needed outside of the right-of-way. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. [Sheet 15] There is 5'x5' box culvert shown as proposed with a WPO plan. Has VDOT seen the design for this culvert? If so, please provide their approval. Also, please add the WPO plan number for reference. Rev. 1: VDOT approval is necessary. Rev. 2: Comment not addressed. Rev. 3: Comment addressed. Please clarify Foxworth Lane vs Lockett lane labels. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. Please show VDOT crossdrains wherever required. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. [Sheet 25] Please remove the Berkmar Overlook label at the top of the sheet. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. Please label the dimensions and type of rip -rap at the end of storm profiles where applicable. Rev. 1: Comment addressed. iRev. 1: [Sheet 251 Please add the headings to this chart: 1 1 " ' 1x 1 —1 "' W — 1 —1TIr, 1 = 1n-I .,w I . I moo K Rev. 2: Comment addressed. Rev. 1: Please ensure parallel parking meets county standards in section 18-4.12.16. They should be 9ft x 20 ft. Rev. 2: Comment addressed. Rev. 1: Ensure Archer and Stella are labeled correctly in all locations. Rev. 2: Comment addressed. 22. Rev. 2: On sheet 3, please remove status of plans. You can reference the plan number, but please do not say "under review" as that may change before plan approval. Rev. 3: Comment addressed. 23. Rev. 2: On sheet 13, there are 2 sections for Archer. Please provide the stationing for these sections or remove the incorrect labeling. Rev. 3: Comment addressed. Planning (Cameron Langille) 1. See attached letter dated 06/08/2020. Rev. 1: See attached comment letter dated 8/25/20. Rev. Engineering Review Comments Page 3 of 3 2: See attached comment letter dated 12/2/2020. Rev. 3: See comment letter attached dated 2/19/21. Rev. 4: No objection. See attached letter dated 6/14/21. Rev. 5: No objection. Transportation Planning (Dan Butch) 1. Refer to the VDOT Road Design Manual Appendix 13-1 for appropriate street trees within planting strip adjacent to sidewalks. Rev. 1: On the typical cross street section of 61' for Eustis Avenue detail should be shown for 6" white lane striping between bike lane and travel lane as shown on the other public road cross sections. Rev. 2: Comment addressed. VDOT (Adam Moore) 1. See attached letter dated 05/26/20. Rev. 1: See attached comment letter dated 8/21/20. Rev. 2: See attached letters dated 11/20/20 and 10/9/2020. Rev. 3: No objections. Rev. 4: Approved. Rev. 5: Approved. Fire Rescue (Shawn Maddox) 1. No Objection. ACSA (Alexander Morrison) 1. Still under review per email dated 8/24/2020. Rev. 2: No objections. Rev. 4: Still under review per email dated 6/3/21. Rev5: Approved. GIS (Brian Becker) 1. Critical Issues: The road name "Lockett Lane" is unacceptable. Comments: There are already 5 other roads in the County that have names beginning with "Lock". Part I, Section 4-i of the Albemarle County Road Naming and Property Numbering Manual says:"No proposed road name shall be approved which begins with a word that appears as the first word in five or more official road names. Homophones and homographs are considered the same word for the purposes of this restriction. The restriction also includes roads where the first word is concatenated to subsequent words or contains different punctuation marks (e.g., Greensleeves Rd is considered to start with "Green" or "Star's" is considered the same as "Stars." A complete list of existing road names can be found in the Albemarle County Master Road Names Directory at the link below. Please provide this office with three (3) new candidate road names for review. Resources: A PDF version of the Ordinance and Manual can be found here: https://www.albemarle.org/upload/images/Forms Center/Departments/Geographic_ Data Service s/Forms/Road_Nam ing_and_Property_Numbering_Ordinance_and_Manual.pdf Albemarle County Master Road Names Directory: htto: //www.albemarle.org/albemarle/upload/images/webgpps/roads/. Rev. 1: No Objections. Rev. 5: No objection. ARB (Margaret Maliszewski) 1. Provide street trees 40' on center (or equivalent) along Koch Court. Rev. 1: No objections. Rev 5: No objections. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me either by email (ecox2@albemarle.org) or by phone at 434-296-5832 ext. 3565. Sincerely, Emily Cox, P.E. Civil Engineer II