HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP202100084 Correspondence 2021-11-03 (2)BOHLERI
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
North Wing
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4579
Attn: Kevin McCollum
Dear Mr. McCollum,
28 Blackwell Park Lane, Suite 201
Warrenton, VA 20186
o. 540.349.4500
October 29, 2021
Digital Upload
Re: SDP 2021-00054
Discount Tire - Initial Site Plan 1S1
Review Response
1636 Seminole Trail
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Albemarle County
BE # V211201
Bohler Engineering is pleased to submit on behalf of Halle Properties, LLC the revised Final Site
Plan 15t Submission for the Discount Tire in Albemarle County, Virginia. The following is our
comment response letter addressing comments received from various departments. Each
comment is addressed and responded to as follows:
Albemarle County Planning Services — Kevin McCollum
Comment 1: Revise the plan to provide addition planting area along Rt. 29 frontage to
accommodate required frontage trees free of utilities and easements. Note that
this will likely require the elimination of the 8-space parking row and possibility
some oof the adjacent travelway.
Response 1: Additional planting area has been provided along the route 29 frontage
(southwest property line A) by shifting the layout Northwest away from the
easements. All the proposed trees and shrubs along property line A have
been adjusted to be located outside of any existing or proposed easements
and avoid conflicts with any utilities. Medium street trees have been
proposed due to the presence of overhead wires. See the Landscape Plan,
sheet C-701.
Comment 2: Please correct the Tax Map and Parcel Number on the cover sheet and any
additional TMP reference
number on the Plans to say Tax Map and Parcel number or simply TMP instead
of "PIN."
Response 2: Tax map and parcel acronym revised on Sheet C-101 and were referenced
in plans.
w . BohlerEngineering.com
BOHLERI
Kevin McCollum
Initial Site Plan 15' Review Response
October 29, 2021
Page 2 of 11
Comment 3: Please include the following general information and information regarding the
proposed use on the Cover Sheet.
a. Zoning District — Highway Commercial
b. Zoning Overlay Districts — Airport Impact Area and Entrance Corridor
c. Please include a reference to the Initial Site Plan Number: SDP202100054
d. The proposed use and square footage of the building
e. The schedule of parking and amount provided
f. Maximum building height permitted and the proposed building height
Response 3: The following general information has been added to Sheet C-101 in the
Site Data section.
Comment 4: The parking schedule on Sheet C-301 suggests that there are 15 employees and
6 service bays for a total minimum parking requirement of 27 spaces. Section
4.12.4 of the Zoning Ordinance states that the total number of parking spaces
provided may not exceed the parking requirements by more than 20 percent. 33
parking spaces is ((33-27)/27 = 0.2222) 22.22 percent more than the parking
requirements. Please remove one parking space or revise the Plans accordingly.
Response 4: Parking schedule has been revised on Sheet C-301. 32 parking spaces are
now provided ((32-27)/27 = 0.18) which is 18 percent more than the parking
requirements.
Comment 5: Please see VDOT comment #1 (attached). Provide pedestrian accommodations
across the entrance.
Response 5: Sidewalk and CG-12 ADA ramps added for pedestrian crossing at site
entrance shown on Sheet C-301.
Comment 6: Any new easements required for water, sewer, drainage facilities, or any
proposed utilities will need to be reviewed, approved, and recorded prior to final
site plan approval. Please submit an easement plat application the County for
review. The final site plan will need to be updated so that all easements are
shown and labeled identifying easement type, whether it's public or private, a
width dimension, and the recorded instrument with deed book and page number.
Response 6: Proposed storm sewer easement shown on Sheet C-501. An easement plat
will be prepared prior to final site plan approval.
Comment 7: Please use a light loss factor of 1.0 to determine footcandles on site. It is unclear
what LLF factor was used on the Lighting Plan.
Response 7: Photometric plan has been updated as requested, see Sheet C-704.
Comment 8: Please add a note to which states "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp
that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be
arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and
adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and
property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one-half
footcandle."
Response 8: Lighting note added to Notes #1 on Sheet C-704.
w . BohlerEngineering.com
BOHLER
Kevin McCollum
Initial Site Plan 1s' Review Response
October 29, 2021
Page 3 of 11
Comment 9: Please provide a signature panel for signature by each member of the site review
committee.
Response 9: Signature panel for site review committee added to Sheet C-101.
Comment 10: On the final site plan, please provide a plan and profile view detail of the
proposed dumpster enclosure. Identify the dimensions, materials, etc.
Response 10:Trash enclosure plan/elevations provided on Conceptual Color Elevations
& Trash Enclosure included with ARB submission on Friday, October 22od
2021.
Comment 11: Please show that concrete will be used as the surface material at the dumpster
enclosure. The concrete pad must extend a minimum of 8' beyond the front of
the dumpster.
Response 11:Concrete surface material is shown at the dumpster enclosure and extends
8' from the dumpster on Sheet C-301.
Comment 12: Please provide traffic generation figures. See VDOT comments for further
information.
Response 12: Vehicles per day count shown on Sheet C-301.
Comment 13: Please see VDOT comment #4. The proposed entrances to the site do not meet
VDOT spacing requirements, and VDOT has stated that an Access Management
Exception (AME) needs to be approved in order to allow the proposed entrance
location. Please coordinate directly with VDOT to address the AME requirement.
Response 13: Two AME requests were approved by VDOT on August 6, 2021 for the
proposed project and are provided on Sheet C-902.
Comment 14: The Site Plan currently shows a 25' landscape buffer along the property frontage.
Why is this being provided? Is this an existing easement that applies to the
property?
Response 14: The previous 25' landscape buffer along the route 29 frontage (southwest
property line A) has been removed. See the Landscape Plan, sheet C-701.
Enaineerina Services — David James
Comment 1: Land disturbance is over 10,000 sf submit a VSMP application for review.
Response 1: Acknowledged. VSMP application will be submitted for review during Final
Site Plan process.
Comment 2: The VSMP plan will need to be approved and bonded before final plat approval.
Response 2: Acknowledged.
Comment 3: Sheet 302: Show storm structure numbering, type & pipe size/length information.
Response 3: Storm structure numbering, type & pipe size/length are shown on Sheets C-
501 — C-503.
w . BohlerEngineering.com
BOHLER
Kevin McCollum
Initial Site Plan 1s' Review Response
October 29, 2021
Page 4 of 11
Comment 4: Show dumpster pad & detail.
Response 4: Trash enclosure plan/elevations provided on Conceptual Color Elevations
& Trash Enclosure included with ARB submission on Friday, October 22od
2021.
Comment 5: Provide safety railing for walls over 30in. high.
Response 5: Safety railing is provided for both retaining walls shown on Sheet C-401.
Labels have been added to Sheet C-301.
Comment 6: Proposed wall in steep slope area have a maximum height of 6ft. [30.7.5 A.]
Response 6: Not applicable. Maximum height of proposed retaining walls is 4.8'.
Comment 7: Parking area exceed 5% slope. [4.12.15 c.]
Response 7: Parking area grading revised so that slopes for parking spaces do not
exceed 5%. See Sheet C-401 for revised grading and slopes.
Comment 8: Minimum sidewalk width is 5ft adj. to parking/travelways.
Response 8: Sidewalk width adjacent to parking and travelways are a minimum of 5'.
Dimensions on Sheet C-301.
Comment 9: Stormwater management facilities are not shown or mentioned. If SWIM BMPs
are expected they should be shown because it could affect the overall site design
layout.
Response 9: No BMPs are proposed on site. Proposed storm sewer will connect to
existing storm sewer system. Additional phosphorus load will be handled
with the purchase of nutrient credits.
Comment 10: Provide TW/BW elevations at each corner and the max. height point(s) along
wall.
Response 10:TW/BW elevations for the walls are shown on Sheet C-401.
Comment 11: Show graded areas over 3:1. Where grading is over 3:1 provide low
maintenance (not grass) ground cover.
Response 11:Graded areas over 3:1 are labeled on Sheet C-401. All groundcover and
ornamental grasses have been proposed along all steep slopes on site.
Due to screening requirements along the Southwest property line (B) we
propose a massing of ornamental grasses to stabilize the 2:1 slopes and
still provide adequate screening to the adjacent property.
Comment 12: Provide drainage area maps, drainage structure tables.
Response 12: Pre and post drainage area maps shown on Sheets C-601 & 602 on the
VSMP plan. Drainage structure tables and calculations shown on Sheet C-
503 on the Final Site Plan.
Comment 13: Show proposed utility lines & structures and profiles.
Response 13:Proposed utility lines and structures are shown on Sheet C-501. Profiles
shown on Sheet C-502.
w . BohlerEngineering.com
BOHLERI
Kevin McCollum
Initial Site Plan 15' Review Response
October 29, 2021
Page 5 of 11
Comment 14: Pedestrian crossing was removed at entrance. Provide CG-12, sidewalk &
pedestrian crossing to existing sidewalks.
Response 14: Sidewalk and CG-12 added for pedestrian crossing at site entrance shown
on Sheet C-301. Per VDOT standards, no crosswalk striping is proposed.
Comment 15: Note: VDOT entrance permit required prior to approval.
Response 15:Acknowledged.
Comment 16: Provide guardrail before wall drop-off (where height is a foot or above).
Response 16:Proposed parking is on cut side of retaining wall so there is no drop off.
See Sheet C-401 for grading and wall elevation shots. A railing has been
added to the top of the retaining wall and labeled on Sheet C-301.
Buildina Inspections — Betty Slouah
Comment 1: Add the following note to the general notes page: Accessible parking spaces,
access isles, and accessible route shall be installed in accordance with ICC ANSI
A117.1-09 and the 2015 Virginia Construction Code.
Response 1: Note added to Albemarle County Notes on Sheet C-102.
Comment 2: Add the following note to the general notes page: ALL water lines, sewer lines,
and fire lines from the main to the structure located on private property MUST
have a visual inspection performed by the building department.
Response 2: Note added to Albemarle County Notes on Sheet C-102.
Comment 3: Add the following note to the general notes page: Where the flood level rims of
plumbing fixtures are below the elevation of the manhole cover of the next
upstream manhole in the public sewer, the fixtures shall be protected by a
backwater valve installed in the building drain, branch of the building drain or
horizontal branch serving such fixtures. Plumbing fixtures having flood level rims
above the elevation of the manhole cover of the next upstream manhole in the
public sewer shall not discharge through a backwater valve.
Response 3: Note added to Albemarle County Notes on Sheet C-102.
Comment 4: Add the following to the general notes page: All roof drains shall discharge in a
manner not to cause a public nuisance and not over sidewalks.
Response 4: Note added to Albemarle County Notes on Sheet C-102.
Comment 5: Add the following note to the general notes page: Buildings or structures built
before January 1, 1985 must have an asbestos survey performed in order to
apply for a demolition permit. Asbestos removal permits are required if positive
for such from Albemarle County and VDOLI. Contact VDOLI for their additional
requirements and permits for demolition projects at 540-562-3580 x131.
Response 5: Note added to Albemarle County Notes on Sheet C-102.
w . BohlerEngineering.com
BOHLER
Department of Fire Rescue — Howard Lagomarsino
Kevin McCollum
Initial Site Plan 1s' Review Response
October 29, 2021
Page 6 of 11
Comment 1: Emergency/fire vehicle access road/route needs to provide an unobstructed
travel way width of 20 ft. if buildings/structures are under 30 feet tall and 26 ft. if
buildings/structures are over 30 feet tall and extend so that all sides of the
ground level are within 150 ft of the fire apparatus. To ensure these stay
unobstructed, no parking signs are needed on the north and south sides of the
building
Response 1: Fire lane plan shown on Sheet C-303 showing necessary signage along the
travelways on the north and south side of the building.
Comment 2: Please provide as a note on the plans the ISO required fire flow for the building.
Response 2: Flow Test Summary & Water Supply Analysis completed by E J
Engineering Group dated March 17, 2021 is provided under separate cover.
Comment 3: Hydrants need to be spaced according to the requirements that are based on the
required fire flow (generally, no building is to be more than 250 feet from a
hydrant, but a requirement for increased fire flow may require closer distances).
Please indicate the location of the closest hydrant(s) and provide a note on the
plan with the fire flow available to ensure it meets the ISO calculated flow.
Response 3: Flow Test Summary & Water Supply Analysis completed by E J
Engineering Group dated March 17, 2021 is provided under separate cover.
A dimension has been added to Sheet C-303 to show that the existing
hydrant is within 250' of the proposed building.
Comment 4: A Knox Box will be required. Please place a note indicating this on the plan. The
location of this can be coordinated with the Fire Marshal's Office. Please place a
note on the plan acknowledging this
Response 4: Note added to Albemarle County Notes on Sheet C-102.
Albemarle County Service Authority — Richard Nelson
Comment 1: Provide fixture counts to confirm the existing 5/8th meter can be reused.
Response 1: Fixture counts to confirm existing meter use will be provided by the
architect with a subsequent submission.
Comment 2: Add a note on the demo plan that water/sewer services will be required to be
disconnected prior to demo permit approval.
Response 2: Note added to Demolition Notes #3 on Sheet C-203.
Comment 3: Confirm sewer lateral size. Confirm if an existing sewer lateral can be reused.
Response 3: Plan proposes 6" pvc sanitary lateral. The existing lateral is not proposed
to be reused.
Comment 4: Confirm water service line depth going to 1640 Seminole Trail.
Response 4: Existing water service line depth to adjacent parcel is unknown. However
existing grade has been maintained along the existing water service line so
cover has been maintained.
w . BohlerEngineering.com
BOHLER
Kevin McCollum
Initial Site Plan 1s' Review Response
October 29, 2021
Page 7 of 11
Comment 5: Confirm trees are outside of the ACSA sewer easement.
Response 5: All the proposed trees and shrubs along property line A have been adjusted
to be located outside the ACSA sewer easement and avoid conflicts with
any utilities. See the Landscape Plan, sheet C-701.
Department of Transportation — Adam Moore
Comment 1: There are no pedestrian accommodations shown across the entrance. Please
add the crosswalk and CG-12 to the Plans.
Response 1: Sidewalk and CG-12 added for pedestrian crossing at site entrance shown
on Sheet C-301. Per VDOT standards, no crosswalk striping is proposed.
Comment 2: Provide anticipated traffic generation numbers.
Response 2: Vehicles per day count shown on Sheet C-301.
Comment 3: Provide turn lane warrants for Route 29.
Response 3: The existing use has an ITE Trip Generation of 707 VPD and did not require
a turn lane. The proposed use has an ITE Trip Generation of 110 VPD which
is a -84% decrease in traffic so a turn lane study should not be required.
Comment 4: Entrances do not meet spacing requirements, an Access Management Exception
will be required.
Response 4: Two AME requests were approved by VDOT on August 6, 2021 for the
proposed project and are provided on Sheet C-902.
Comment 5: Sight distance shown (465 ft) does not conform with the requirement of 500 ft in
Table 2-5 in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual. Please correct the problem,
explain the discrepancy, or apply for a Design Waiver.
Response 5: Sight distance revised to 500' and profile shown on Sheet C-801.
Comment 6: Please provide sight -distance profiles along the sight -distance lines.
Response 6: Sight distance revised to 500' and profile shown on Sheet C-801.
Comment 7: Please show limits of mill and overlay in full lane widths required to complete this
work on plans, ensuring compliance with Standard Drawing WP-2. Also, please
add the WP-2 detail to the plans.
Response 7: Limits of mill and overlay for WP-2 shown on Sheet C-301. WP-2 detail
shown on Sheet C-902.
Comment 8: Video inspection of the existing stormwater pipe will be required to confirm it's
condition before tying -in private lines.
Response 8: Acknowledged.
Comment 9: Provide drainage calculations.
Response 9: Pre and post drainage area maps shown on Sheets C-601 & 602 on the
VSMP plan. Drainage structure tables and calculations shown on Sheet C-
503 on the Final Site Plan.
w . BohlerEngineering.com
BOHLER
Kevin McCollum
Initial Site Plan 1s' Review Response
October 29, 2021
Page 8 of 11
Comment 10: The Developer is proposing to remove two of the three architectural street lamps
that fall within the right-of-way between the lateral limits of the subject property.
VDOT is opposed to this, and requests a meeting to discuss conservation and
relocation.
Response 10: The two existing architectural street lamps are labeled as to be relocated
on Sheet C-203.
Comment 11: Note that the final plan must show conformance with the VDOT Road Design
Manual Appendices 3(1) and F, as well as any other applicable standards,
regulations or other requirements.
Response 11: Acknowledged.
Planning — Khristopher Taggart
Comment 1: Provide samples for all materials and colors.
Response 1: Materials board was provided with ARB submission on Friday, October
22nd, 2021.
Comment 2: Revise the masonry to one with a more finished appearance.
Response 2: Masonry updated as requested, see provided Conceptual Color Elevations
& Trash Enclosure included with ARB submission on Friday, October 22nd
2021.
Comment 3: Revise the building forms to establish a more cohesive appearance for the
overall building.
Response 3: Building forms updated as requested, see provided Conceptual Color
Elevations & Trash Enclosure and Color Perspective included with ARB
submission on Friday, October 22nd, 2021.
Comment 4: Revise the design of the north elevation to incorporate architectural detailing to
relieve blankness.
Response 4: North elevation updated as requested, see provided Conceptual Color
Elevations & Trash Enclosure and Color Perspective included with ARB
submission on Friday, October 22nd, 2021.
Comment 5: Revise the size of building forms and the distribution of materials and colors to
create a better sense of human scale and greater coordination throughout the
building.
Response 5: Building forms and material updated as requested, see provided
Conceptual Color Elevations & Trash Enclosure and Color Perspective
included with ARB submission on Friday, October 22nd, 2021.
Comment 6: Revise the color of the ACM to a more muted, earth tone color.
Response 6: Aluminum composite panels updated to Alucobond `Native Copper Mica'
and `Bone White', see provided Conceptual Color Elevations & Trash
Enclosure and Materials Board included with ARB submission on Friday,
October 22nd, 2021.
w . BohlerEngineering.com
BOHLERJ
Kevin McCollum
Initial Site Plan 15' Review Response
October 29, 2021
Page 9 of 11
Comment 7: Revise the architectural drawings to include the standard window glass note:
Visible light transmittance (VL7) shall not drop below 40%. Visible light
reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%. Specifications on the proposed window
glass should be submitted with the application for final review.
Response 7: Note added, see provided Conceptual Color Elevations & Trash Enclosure
included with ARB submission on Friday, October 22nd, 2021.
Comment 8: Show the location of mechanical equipment (building and ground mounted) on
the site and architectural plans and show how it will be screened from the EC.
Response 8: Location of roof mounted mechanical equipment shown on Sheet C-301.
Parapet roof allows for screening of roof mounted equipment.
Comment 9: Revise the site plan to provide a dumpster enclosure detail. A material that
coordinates with that approved for the main building would be appropriate.
Response 9: Trash enclosure plan/elevations provided on Conceptual Color Elevations
& Trash Enclosure included with ARB submission on Friday, October 22nd,
2021.
Comment 10: Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the site plan and architectural
drawings: Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall
be eliminated."
Response 10:Standard mechanical equipment note added to Sheet C-301 Note #2.
Comment 11: Revise the photometric plan to indicate that the plan was calculated using an LLF
of 1. 0 for all fixtures and revise the photometrics accordingly.
Response 11: Photometric plan has been updated as requested, see Sheet C-704.
Comment 12: Revise the color temperature of the pole -mounted lighting to a soft, warm white
(3000K).
Response 12:Photometric plan has been updated as requested, see Sheet C-704.
Comment 13: Revise the lighting plan to indicate the color temperature for the under -canopy
lighting. A lighting temperature of 2000K- 3000K would be appropriate.
Response 13:Photometric plan has been updated as requested, see Sheet C-704.
Comment 14: Revise the height of the pole -mounted fixtures to a height that does not exceed
20', including the base and indicate this on the plan.
Response 14: Photometric plan has been updated as requested, see Sheet C-704.
Comment 15: Add the standard lighting note to the lighting plan: " Each outdoor luminaire
equipped with a lamp that emits 3, 000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff
luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining
residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from
luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning
districts shall not exceed one half footcandle."
Response 15:Photometric plan has been updated as requested, see Sheet C-704.
Comment 16: Revise the plan to provide additional planting area along the Rt. 29 frontage to
accommodate required frontage trees free of utilities and easements. Note that
w . BohlerEngineering.com
BOHLER
Kevin McCollum
Initial Site Plan 1s' Review Response
October 29, 2021
Page 10 of 11
this will likely require the elimination of the 8- space parking row and possibly
some of the adjacent travelway.
Response 16:Additional planting area has been provided along the route 29 frontage
(southwest property line A) by shifting the layout Northwest away from the
easements. All the proposed trees and shrubs along property line A have
been adjusted to be located outside of any existing or proposed easements
and avoid conflicts with any utilities. Medium street trees have been
proposed due to the presence of overhead wires. See the Landscape Plan,
sheet C-701.
Comment 17: Revise the site plan to provide a planting area along the north elevation of the
building.
Response 17:The site plan has been adjusted to provide a planting area along the
Northeast property line (D). Additional plants have been proposed along
this property line including trees and shrubs. See the Landscape Plan and
Landscape Compliance for tabulation information, sheets C-701 and C-702.
Comment 18: Revise the site plan to include the standard landscaping note: " All site plantings
of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature
height, the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned
minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant."
Response 18:The note provided above has been added to the landscape notes (F). See
the See the Landscape Plan and Landscape Compliance, sheets C-701 and
C-702.
Comment 19: Revise the plan to show a pedestrian way across the frontage with the new
development.
Response 19:Sidewalk and CG-12 added for pedestrian crossing at site entrance shown
on Sheet C-301. Per VDOT requirements, a painted crosswalk is not
proposed or allowed.
Comment 20: Add planting beds along the retaining walls to allow for trees at 2. 5" caliper and
shrubs at 24".
Response 20:The site plan has been adjusted to provide a planting area along the
Northeast property line (D). Additional 2.5" caliper trees and 24" shrubs
have been proposed along this property line including. See the Landscape
Plan and Landscape Compliance for tabulation information, sheets C-701
and C-702.
Comment 21: Revise the plan to indicate retaining wall material, color, manufacturer. A block in
a muted, earth -tone color would be appropriate. Samples may be required.
Response 21:Plan has been updated to indicate retaining wall material, see Sheet C-301;
a color sample has also been included with ARB submission on Friday,
October 22nd, 2021.
Comment 22: Terrace all retaining walls over 6' in height and provide planting beds.
Response 22:Not applicable. Retaining wall maximum height is 4.8'.
w . BohlerEngineering.com
BOHLERI
Kevin McCollum
Initial Site Plan 15' Review Response
October 29, 2021
Page 11 of 11
Comment 23: Revise the plans to correct the depth of the landscape buffer.
Response 23:The previous 25' landscape buffer along the route 29 frontage (southwest
property line A) has been removed. See the Landscape Plan, sheet C-701.
Comment 24: Please note separate sign applications are required for all proposed signs. The
following preliminary comments are provided:
a. Revise the wall signs to use either face illumination or halo illumination.
b. Revise the sign proposed on the south elevation so that it has a more
coordinated appearance. This can be done by reducing the size of the sign
and/ or changing the layout to a single line of text.
c. The background of any cabinet signs proposed will be required to have an
opaque background if internally illuminated.
d. Include the size of the existing freestanding sign on the sign drawings. If the
sign is taller than 12' and larger than 32 square feet, the proposal must
include a 25% reduction in height and area until the height reaches 12' and
area reaches 32 sf.
Response 24:Signs have been updated as requested, please see Sign Packages 1 and 2
included with ARB submission on Friday, October 22nd, 2021.
Comment 25: Provide a perspective showing the view of the north elevation from the street.
Response 25: Color Perspective included with ARB submission on Friday, October 22nd,
2021.
Comment 26: Consider reducing the width of the travelway on the north side to create planting
area at the building.
Response 26:Travelway width cannot be reduced but building mounted plant trellis' have
been provided to allow for plantings along the north elevation. See Sheet
C-301 and included Conceptual Color Elevations and Color Perspective
included with ARB submission on Friday, October 22nd, 2021.
Comment 27: Update the rendering to accurately show the scale and type of the proposed
building materials.
Response 27:Rendering updated as requested, see provided Color Perspective included
with ARB submission on Friday, October 22nd, 2021.
Should you have any questions regarding this project or require additional
information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (540) 349-4500.
Sincerely,
Bohler Engineering
�9K%b�
Katherine Roberts, P.E.
KR/tk
\\bohlereng.net\shares\VA-PROJECTS\21\V211201\Administrative\Letters\211029 Inital Site Plan 1st Review CRL.doc
www. BohlerEngineering.com