Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVA200300002 Review Comments 2003-03-17 Amelia McCulley From: Margaret Maliszewski Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 5:53 PM To: Amelia McCulley Subject: RE: historic- Covesville Store Yes, this building was surveyed. The Historic Preservation Committee is currently studying the County's country stores and is formulating recommendations to send to the PC/BOS in conjunction with the review of the Rural Areas chapter of the Comp Plan. The recommendations are in draft form, but I have attached the current draft in case you're interested. Generally, the HPC wants historic stores to be used again as stores. Without knowing the details of the current proposal, I would guess that the HPC would support it. Do you want advisory comments from them? Do you want any more specific info on the building? Position Statement on Country... Margaret M Maliszewski, Design Planner County of Albemarle,Dept.of Planning&Community Development 434-296-5823 x3276 Fax 434-972-4012 Original Message From: Amelia McCulley Sent: Monday,March 17,2003 3:43 PM To: Margaret Maliszewski Subject: historic-Covesville Store Margaret, I'm reviewing a variance for the Covesville Store property. They need a variance of area regs, so they can get a special permit to reopen the store. Do you know if this building is on the survey that Historic Resources did of this area? It's tax map 109, parcel 7E. 1 Position Statement on Albemarle County's Historic Country Stores by the Albemarle County Historic Preservation Committee (DRAFT: March 7, 2003) Overview Historic preservation must be considered an integral component of rural conservation in areas such as Albemarle County, where an agrarian economy predominated during much of its history. Historic buildings, ranging from country stores and churches to farm buildings and domestic residences, as well as historic rural landscapes, often relate directly or indirectly to agricultural pursuits. Accordingly, preserving rural landscapes, that include both historic structures and archaeological resources, is essential to preserving the County's heritage. In addition, keeping Albemarle County rural character is essential to the economic vitality of the region in regards to agricultural businesses and heritage tourism. The Historic Preservation Committee strongly believes that choices about growth and change in the County's Rural Areas should include the preservation of both historic buildings and landscapes. In addition to supporting County initiatives such as Rural Preservation Developments and Purchase of Development Rights/Acquisition of Conservation Easements, we encourage the County to adopt policies that protect historic resources in the Rural Areas. The County has the second largest Rural Historic District in the state (the Southwest Mountains) and has many properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Properties on register lists primarily reflect the high end on the economic scale of our cultural heritage, but there are many other lesser-known properties that are not listed on the registers that are significant to the architectural, historical, and cultural heritage of the County. The threat appears greatest for these unlisted properties — those local and traditional buildings and structures used by the majority of our citizens in the past, and most of those properties are located in our Rural Areas. It is precisely those historic resources that would be most visible and therefore more recognized by today's residents, and which could be significantly impacted by Rural Areas policies. In this document we provide recommendations for the protection of country stores — one type of historic resource located in Albemarle County. Country stores are a microcosm of the historic preservation issues within Rural Areas, concerns that also include churches, farmsteads, rural landscapes, local lodges, and archaeological resources. We encourage the County to adopt effective preservation and conservation policies that can be applied evenly throughout the Rural Areas. Albemarle County's Historic Country Stores The Albemarle County Historic Preservation Committee recommends that the County take specific measures to protect and preserve one of our most quickly vanishing historic resources, country stores. For generations country stores, and their ancillary businesses, have supplied the material necessities of life to rural communities. In addition, they have come to mark crossroads as places where rural neighbors could meet, socialize and conduct business in an expansive rural context. While a dwindling number of country stores still exist, many have disappeared or have left only a vacant collapsing shell. These once vibrant structures are still a potent symbol of a rural way of life and are a significant part of our shared heritage. Albemarle County's surviving country stores are significant at both the national and local level. The country store seems to be a largely American building type that appears in greater proliferation in largely rural and formerly frontier contexts. Unlike more densely settled regions that could support greater economic specialization, individuals and families living in frontier or otherwise rural contexts 1 like eighteenth and nineteenth-century Albemarle County depended on the country store for a majority of their purchased goods. As a result these stores became critical community centers and points of congregation for otherwise dispersed peoples. Once the country store was an established community center, it persisted in that role in Albemarle County and elsewhere through the twentieth century. Information contained in the extant ledgers of country stores reveal a broad network of trade that helped shape communities in Albemarle County and reflected the county's social and commercial ties with other localities. Recent research has revealed that these buildings served as a center of the community in a variety of ways. Some storeowners offered their spaces for community dances, while others provided services to local residents, such as shoe and farm tool repair. Unfortunately, the recent survey undertaken by this committee suggests that a large percentage of these historic community centers have already been lost and that not a single example dating before 1880 still survives. The preservation of these remaining examples is of critical importance; the loss of these stores signals the demise not just of a building type, but of a way of life, community, and memory that once characterized a majority of our county. As the County begins to assess the adaptive reuse of these surviving stores, it should take into account their historically multipurpose use. The Committee believes that, with the County's encouragement, country stores can be both preserved and reintegrated into our plans for the future. The May 2001 draft of the Rural Areas Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan states that there are many buildings located in the crossroad communities that are vacant and could have local significance. The plan further states that these buildings could be renovated to maintain the rural character of the community and to provide a valuable service to the immediate local area (page 16). The plan recommends the preservation and rehabilitation of these historic buildings. Country stores—those purpose-built structures with a history of commercial use in a rural context—are among these important yet threatened historic resources. The Albemarle County Historic Preservation Plan, adopted by the Board of Supervisors in September 2000, identifies the protection of the County's natural, scenic and historic resources in the Rural Areas as a primary goal. The Historic Preservation Committee has conducted research' to better understand this issue. At the outset of our research it became immediately apparent that these buildings were seriously threatened. The Committee's research to date indicates that no stores constructed during the first 130 years of the County's history survive. Only a handful of stores date to the late nineteenth century. The earliest known store to survive is the Store, which dates to . (EXACT NUMBER) of these country stores have been lost in recent decades. Furthermore, (EXACT NUMBER) of them are standing vacant, threatening to join those already lost to conscious demolition or neglect. Only (EXACT NUMBER) of these stores are still operating in their traditional role. In an effort to preserve these buildings, we have made a near comprehensive list of all those buildings in the County (See Appendix A). That appendix includes those historic country stores already lost (List 1), those stores now standing vacant (List 2), those stores that have been adapted for other uses (List 3), and those few stores that have persisted in their original use (List 4). This list is limited to buildings erected after(EXACT DATE). It is our recommendation that in its plan for the rural areas, the County institute the following measures to reintegrate the specifically identified country stores found in lists 2, 3, and 4, of Appendix A as vital and contributing components of our county's rural landscape. For all buildings listed in the Appendix: The Committee's research has consisted primarily of a windshield survey,with some research into historic maps,store ledgers,and photograph collections.This research should not be considered exhaustive. 2 1) Eliminate the current two-year window in which a vacant country store loses its non- conforming and exceptional status as commercial property. The passing of this two-year limit for many of these properties means that property owners must apply for a Special Use Permit (zoning ordinance section 10.2.2.22) to return these buildings to their traditional use. 2) Revise the requirements for parking to allow exceptions to accepted practice when the confines or limits of the property of one of these historic stores do not allow for the standard requirements. Staff will necessarily work out this exception on a case-by-case basis in the spirit of returning the property to its historic commercial use. Discussion: As a means of limiting abuses to these exceptions and preserving the integrity of the buildings, the Historic Preservation Committee recommends that these incentives be allowable and applicable ONLY to the store building as it stands on the property. These exceptional conditions should no longer apply if the building is demolished, moved to another property, or so altered as to render negligible its historic character. As is evident from the preceding statement, the preservation of the historic character and integrity of the building is our principle concern. Nonetheless, we acknowledge that many of these buildings will necessitate additions to make them viable spaces for many contemporary commercial uses. We believe that additions designed in accordance with Standards 9 and 10 of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation (listed in Appendix B) will preserve the store's historic character. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards are accepted by the National Park Service, the National Register for Historic Properties, and numerous other preservation-minded institutions. 3) Allow for the consideration of multiple uses in any of the buildings listed in the Appendix. Discussion: Allowing more than one use in a single building provides additional opportunities for adaptive reuse and for the ultimate preservation of the County's country stores. Among the uses that should be considered are any uses that can be considered for home occupations. Using the store as the place for the home occupation, rather than a residence, could offer a resident greater flexibility in working near home while providing an opportunity to place a historic resource in a useful occupancy. The concept of allowing multiple uses in the store is consistent with the building type's evolution as the needs of the community changed throughout history. For buildings listed in the Appendix whose rehabilitations are completed in accordance with all ten of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation: 4) Institute specific property tax abatements (for the structure only) that will serve as incentives to shop-owners to open or re-open commercial enterprises. Discussion: Our recommendation is that an owner who rehabilitates one of the stores listed in the Appendix for use as a store should receive a 10-year grace period from county taxes assessed on the structure. For adaptive reuses (uses other than country store) of buildings listed in the Appendix, we recommend a 5-year grace period from county taxes assessed on the structure only. We further recommend that this tax relief should apply to improvements to stores listed in the Appendix that are already in operation. 3 The small number of properties to which this would apply is not expected to impede the County's revenue. In fact, nothing is lost since these buildings do little to contribute to the tax base as vacant shells. Property owners could combine this County tax abatement with the 20% Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit and 25% State Credit, which would amount to a substantial incentive to preserve our country stores. Albemarle County's historic country stores were once a vital component of our county; they are today an eroding memory of our local heritage. If Albemarle County intends to preserve its distinctive character, these important and distinctive historic buildings must receive the special attention they deserve. Country stores are one component of the built environment in the rural areas. We have addressed stores first because they are the rural resources with the greatest potential to be impacted by blanket policies and regulations. However, responsible preservation planning is required for all historic resources in the rural areas. The Historic Preservation Committee will continue to study the rural areas and would like to continue to update the Board of Supervisors as other important rural commercial structures are discovered. Also, the Committee hopes that the Board will remain open to the concept that previous surveys and future discoveries could expand the current list of historic country stores. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to voice our concerns and recommendations. 4 APPENDIX A Country Store Lists NOTE: These lists may be amended if/when additional stores are discovered. 5 APPENDIX B SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION2 1) A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. 2) The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. 3) Each property shall be recognized saw a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken. 4) Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved. 5) Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property shall be preserved. 6) Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary,physical, or pictorial evidence. 7) Chemical or physic treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used. The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. 8) Significant archeological resources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken. 9) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. 10)New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property would be unimpaired. 2 W.Brown Morton,III,et.al. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Illustrated Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings, (National Park Service, 1992),vii. 6