HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP202100009 Review Comments Final Site Plan and Comps. 2021-11-19County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Justin Shimp, Shimp Engineering
From: Tori Kanellopoulos — Senior Planner
Division: Planning Services
Date: November 19. 2021
REV 3
Subject: SDP202100009 — 999 Rio Road — Final Site Plan
The Planner for the Planning Services Division of the Albemarle County Department
Community Development will recommend approval of the plan referred to above when
the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are
those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be
added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the
applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.]
Required Prior to Final Site Plan Approval:
Planning (Tori Kanellopoulos)
1. 18-32.6.2 Requirements of a final site plan.
a. Show any proposed ROW dedication. This will need to be completed with
a plat.
i. REV 2: Per applicant's response, this will be completed with the
final plat that is under review (SUB2021-58).
ii. REV 3: Comment remains.
2. 18-4.6.1 FI _..._. _ ... __ ...__ _... _ ... _ .. Block 1 must front on a public or private
street (lots in Block 2 front on an amenity). If the multiuse path (MUP) becomes
part of the ROW, the lots should front on the edge of the ROW/MUP. If the MUP
does not become part of the ROW, the lot lines will need to extend to the ROW,
and a public access easement will be needed over the MUP.
i. REV 2: Per applicant's response, this will be completed with the
final plat that is under review (SUB2021-58). Lots are shown
fronting on the new ROW.
18-4.6.1 Frontage. The amenity area for Block 2 must include a private street for
frontage for Lots 8-18. The application plan for the ZMA also shows a private
street. The private street easement must extend to the front of each lot for
frontage purposes.
i. REV 2: Per applicant's response, this will be completed with the
final plat that is under review (SUB2021-58). Note that lot lines
need to extend to the private street easement. This also needs to
be labeled 'private street easement' on the site plan and plat, not
'access easement'. Lots 8-13 and a portion of Lot 18 are not
adjacent to the private street easement. Please extend the
dimensions of the private street easement.
ii. REV 3: Addressed with final plat, and private street easement label
added.
4. 18-4.12.10 Shared parking. A shared parking agreement will be required for the
shared parking between uses and Blocks. This agreement must meet the
requirements of 18-4.12.8(e).
a. REV 2: This agreement will be reviewed with the final plat SUB2021-58
and has been sent to the Planning reviewer (Cameron Langille) for the
plat. Note that the parking locations/requirements for the office parking
(Phase 2) will need to be determined once that Phase is submitted. It
appears there are 9 shared spaces currently available. No further action is
needed on the site plan for this comment.
5. 18-4.12.13(e) and 18-4.12.19 Dumpster. Provide a dumpster/dumpster pad for
the office. Ensure the 18-32.7.9 screening requirements are met.
a. REV 2: Addressed per information on Sheet C10.
6. 18-32.7.9 Landscaping plan. A landscaping plan is required with the final site
plan. The following are preliminary comments:
a. 18-32.7.9.4: Show the requirements of the contents of a landscape plan,
including existing landscaping/natural features and proposed landscaping.
Provide a conservation checklist if trees are being retained. Show removal
of existing landscaping on the demolition plan.
i. REV 2: Addressed.
b. 18-32.7.9.5: Ensure street trees meet all of the relevant requirements,
including minimum caliper and spacing.
i. REV 2: Addressed.
c. 18-32.7.9.7 Ensure all required screening meets the requirements of this
section and of the ZMA application plan. Parking areas must also be
screened according to note D-7 in the Code of Development.
i. REV 2: Addressed.
7. ZMA201900001 Code of Development: The following are comments regarding
the Code of Development:
a. Front setback Block 1: Note that boundaries will likely change with ROW
dedication for the MUP. This will affect where setbacks are measured
from. The MUP should be dedicated to public use and should become part
of the ROW.
i. REV 2: Addressed. Setbacks are met. MUP is part of ROW
dedication.
b. Rear setback Block 2: Note that boundaries will likely change with ROW
dedication for MUP; ensure setbacks are still met.
i. REV 2: Addressed.
I
(J
c. Include a table for the amenity and greenspaces detailing how the
requirement is being met. Adding up the totals in Block 1, it appears 8,538
SF is provided. For Block 2, it appears 10,439 SF is provided (more than
listed on sheet 1).
i. REV 2: Addressed.
d. Label the affordable housing units on the final site plan.
i. REV 2: Addressed. Units 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 (6 total units) are
affordable units. The minimum requirement is 4 total units.
e. Include a note on sheet 1 that a minimum of 15% of the dwelling units
must be affordable.
i. REV 2: Addressed.
ZMA201900001 Application Plan: The following are comments regarding the
application plan:
a. The application plan shows a pedestrian connection between the office
and the amenity area in Block 2. Provide this connection.
i. REV 2: Addressed.
b. A landscape area is required along the eastern and northern sides of the
development, per the application plan. This would include the area behind
Lots 16-21. If the required landscape area will be provided on the lots, a
— q--ina easement will be required
i.
Additional applications: The following applications and approvals are required
prior to final site plan approval:
a. 18-32.7.4.2 and 18-32.7.5.3: Easement Plats: All new and adjusted
easements must be shown on an easement plat, which must be approved
prior to final site plan approval, and must match the final site plan. The
DB/PG of new easements must be shown on the final site plan.
i. REV 2: In progress. Easements must be approved prior to plan
approval, which can be done with SUB2021-58 (final plat). Once
easements are recorded, add DB/PG to final site plan.
ii. REV 3: Comment remains.
III. �—A_ caacJI1c1ILa will be needed. Offsite easements must
be approved prior to final site plan approval.
1. REV 2: The Board of Supervisors approved this offsite
easement on County property on June 2, 2021.
b. 18-32.7.4.1: Approval of a VSMP Plan is required prior to final site plan
approval. See Engineering comments.
i. REV 2: VSMP is under review.
ii.
c. Chapter 14: A final subdivision plat will be required for subdividing the
lots. This can be approved before or after final site plan approval.
i. REV 2: A final plat (SUB2021-58) is under review.
ii. REV 3: Comment remains.
d. 18-30.6: A certificate or appropriateness (C uiA) from the ARB is required
prior to final site plan approval.
i. REV 2: ARB review comments were provided on May 24, 2021.
ii. REV 3: Addressed.
10. [32.7.5.1, 32.5.2(a), 32.5.2(d), VA State Code 15.2-1800] Grading is taking
place on TMP 062FO-00-00-OOOE2, which is property owned by Albemarle
County. Prior to final site plan approval an easement shall be reviewed,
approved, and then recorded in the Clerk's Office which allows grading on this
parcel. Please submit an easement plat for County review, here is a LINK to the
application. Prior to County approval of the easement plat the Board of
Supervisors shall hold a public hearing and act on the easement.
a. REV 2: Addressed. Grading is no longer shown off -site.
11. [32.5.2(a)] The adjacent property to the south is incorrectly labeled, it is truly
TMP 062FO-00-00-OOOE2. Revise.
a. REV 2: Addressed.
12. [32.5.2(a)] Based on the County's GIS the abutting property to the north adjacent
to Belvedere Blvd is TMP 062GO-01-00-00OA0, owned by Belvedere
Neighborhood Association Inc. In speaking with Ms. Scro this property was
added to the Belvedere Blvd right of way and is no longer an individual TMP. If
this is the case, for this area provide the recordation information for this action. If
it turns out the parcel still exists, depict and label the TMP and owner. If it does
exist prior to final site plan approval an easement shall be reviewed, approved,
and then recorded in the clerk's office which allows these improvements to be
located on this parcel.
a. REV 2: Addressed. Reference DB 3617 PG 633.
13. [32.7.9.7, 32.5.2(b), ZMA2019-1] COD Section V, Notes to Table D #7. Provide
documentation to prove the following requirement has been addressed. Provide
minutes and an action letter from a duly authorize meeting of the HOA, and
signed letters from the individuals/entities listed in (2) and (3) below, agreeing to
one of three screening options provided for each of the three locations listed
below.
a. REV 2: Addressed.
14. [ZMA2019-1, 32.5.2(b), 32.5.2(n)] Application Plan. Along Rio Road East the
asphalt multiuse path shall be a minimum of 11.5' wide for the entire duration of
Rio Road East fronting the property. Also, depict, label, and dimension the edge
of the existing path along Rio Road East. The proposed path shall connect to the
existing path. Revise.
a. REV 2: Addressed.
15. [ZMA2019-1, 4.12.19, 32.7.9, 30.6] COD Section V, Notes to Table D #9. On the
plan provide a note that certifies onsite treatment of 25% of the required
stormwater treatment.
a. REV 2: Addressed.
16. [ZMA2019-1, 32.5.2(b), 32.5.2(n)] COD Section ll. The site shall have a
minimum of 500 square feet of nonresidential SF. Currently the office building is
not proposed. On the final site plan provide a phase line and state that this area
is designated for the required nonresidential use.
a. REV 2: Addressed. Phase 2 is labeled.
17. [ZMA2019-1, 32.5.2(b), 32.5.2(c), 32.5.2(n)] Application Plan. Provide a
sidewalk internal to the site which connects to Rio Road East. If the applicant
seeks to install this sidewalk during the construction of the office building, please
label this required improvement in phase 2. Depict phase lines for phase 2.
a. REV 2: Addressed. Will be provided in Phase 2.
18. [ZMA2019-1] COD Section V. On the cover sheet list the number of units
proposed, to also include the accessory 1-bedroom apartments. Throughout the
plans label which units contain 1-bedroom accessory apartments. These units
are only permitted in Block 1 per the COD.
a. REV 2: Addressed.
19. [32.5.2(a), ZMA2019-1] Provide a note on the cover sheet that Special
Exceptions were approved on 1-14-2020. List the items subject of the variation.
a. REV 2: Addressed.
20. [32.5.2(a), ZMA2019-1] Application Plan. Dimension and label the landscape
strip along Rio Road East (five feet and five inches minimum) and Belvedere
Boulevard (3 feet minimum).
a. REV 2: Addressed.
Engineering (David James)
4. REV 3: 4 Sheets 3/7/12 —
a. Add note that sidewalk shall be 7" thick at emergency access entrance.
b. Add note to curb details that a 6" 21-A or better stone base is required.
i. (Rev.2) Not addressed. No note provided. Provide a callout to a
detail sheet.
ii. (Rev.3) Partially addressed. Show the extent of heavy-duty
sidewalk and CG-3 curbing use. It's not clear from drawing.
10. (Rev. 1) Easement deed & plat needs to be recorded prior to site plan
approval.
a. (Rev.3) Comment still valid.
VDOT (Adam Moore)
1. REV 3: See attached comments dated October 20, 2021.
Fire/Rescue (Howard Lagomarsino)
1. REV 2: No objection. Thank you for providing requested changes.
ACSA (Richard Nelson)
REV 3: See attached letter dated November 5, 2021, as well as marked up site plan.
Comments from letter included here:
1. Sheet C4
a. 1. Shift the water main away from the parking space stripes.
b. 2. Provide easement around proposed water service to vacant lot. 3. Add
a 4" reducer past the sidewalk for Lots 8-18.
2. Sheet C5
a. 1. Callout a bend on the existing
from the proposed sewer main.
b. 2. Extend restoration limits from
FHA line and relocate the FHA away
MH2A to MH1A.
3. Sheet C6
a. 1. Proposed water main profile from STA 10+00 to —11+50 should be
shown at a shallower depth.
RWSA (Dyon Vega)
1. REV 3: No Objection.
Inspections (Betty Slough) REV 3 Pending
1. REV 3: No objection.
2. REV 2: Note to developer: Due to required distances from lot lines and structures
as required by the NFPA, underground propane tanks may be prohibited. Plan
accordingly.
Architectural Review Board (Margaret Maliszewski)
1. REV 3: No objection.
VDH (Alan Mazurowski)
1. See attached comment letter dated October 29, 2021: 1 recommend that a note
be added to the cover sheet indicating that any existing wells are to be
abandoned in accordance with Virginia Department of Health Private Well
Regulations.
E911 (Elise Kiewra)
1. REV 3: No Objection.
Albemarle County
Service Auth♦rity
Serving 6 Conserving
November 5, 2021
Shimp Engineering
Attn: Mr. Justin Shimp, P.E.
201 East Main Street, Suite M
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
Re: 999 Rio Road
Dear Mr. Shimp:
We have reviewed the plans entitled "999 Rio Road," dated October 1,
2021. The following comments need to be addressed.
Sheet C4
1. Shift the water main away from the parking space stripes.
2. Provide easement around proposed water service to vacant lot.
3. Add a 4" reducer past the sidewalk for Lots 8-18.
Sheet C5
1. Callout a bend on the existing FHA line and relocate the FHA away from
the proposed sewer main.
2. Extend restoration limits from MH2A to MH1A.
Sheet C6
1. Proposed water main profile from STA 10+00 to -11+50 should be shown
at a shallower depth.
If you have any questions concerning this review feel free to call me at
(434) 977-4511, Ext. 113.
Sincerely,
Richard Nelson
Civil Engineer
RN/dbh
050601 999 Rio Road Comments110521
168 Spotnap Road - Charlottesville, VA 22911 - Phone (434) 977-4511 - Fax (434) 979-0698
www.serviceauthority.org
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Stephen C. Brich, P.E. 1401 East Broad Street (804) 7862701
Commissioner Richmond, Virginia 23219 Fax: (804) 7862940
October 20, 2021
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Attn: Cameron Langille
Re: 999 Rio Road — Final Site Plan
SDP-2021-00009
Revised Review #3
Dear Mr. Langille:
The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Shimp Engineering, dated 26
May 2020, revised 01 October 2021, and offer the following comments:
1. The Standard Drawings contained in the VDOT Road & Bridge Standards are signed and
sealed engineering drawings that are copyrighted materials of VDOT and the
Commonwealth of Virginia. VDOT's policy is to offer the Standard Drawings in a secure
electronic format and each Standard is available on this website.
http://www.virginiadot.org/business/locdes/vdot road and bridge standards.asp
2. Plan assemblies using the Road & Bridge Standards shall reference each standard used.
Inserting the Standard Drawings into locality, or private development plan assemblies, or
modifying the Standard Drawings in any way, is not permitted. Please remove all
standard drawings from plan set.
If further information is desired, please contact Willis C. Bedsaul at 434-422-9866.
A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right of way. The
owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency land Use Section at (434) 422-9399
for information pertaining to this process.
Sincerely,
Adam J. Moore, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
Blue Ridge Hearth Dlshkf
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEArTH
4lo,OE Nf%
W ■ �gg
e G
c
AWA
9 ■ e
NIM
Tori Kanellopoulos
Albemarle County Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: 999 Rio Road
Final Site Development Plan
Tax Map: 61-154B
SDP202100009
Mr. Kanellopoulos:
Charlottesville; Albemarle
Health Department
1 138 Rose Hill Drive
Charlottesville. VA 22903
aelte 434-972-6200 1 tax 434-972-4310
October 29, 2021
As requested, I've reviewed the subject plat, dated 10/1/21, for the proposed construction
referenced above. It appears all new facilities will be connected to public water and sewer
systems, so I see no issues there.
Sheet C2, Existing Conditions, shows an existing well that is to be removed, however, I
recommend that a note be added to the cover sheet indicating that any existing wells are to be
abandoned in accordance with Virginia Department of Health Private Well Regulations.
After a search of our records, I am not aware of any wells or onsite septic systems that are not
shown on the site plan.
If there are any questions or concerns, please give me a call, 434-972-4306.
Sincerely, f_
r�
Alan Mazurowski
Environmental Health Supervisor
Thomas Jefferson Health District
alan.mazurowski(a�vdh.vir ig nia.gov