HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA200400013 Correspondence 2004-09-14 Jan Sprinkle
From: Rebecca Ragsdale
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 9:07 AM
To: Jan Sprinkle
Cc: Joan McDowell
Subject: ZMA 04-13/Mt. Valley Farm
This is to rezone the PRD half of TMP 89-73A to RA. I don't know how familiar you are with this one. They want to rezone
the 14-acre portion of the property to include it in an RA subdivision-Mountain Valley Farm. The overall PRD was
approved for 104 lots total, minimum 40,000 sq. ft. in size, with about 28% of open space planned. There is a note in
the file that the rezoning is for 214.5 acres but that the deeded acreage only adds up to 198.75. The 14-acre piece
requested for rezoning with this ZMA was not rezoned with the owner's consent, the PRD owners thought they owned
the 14-acres as part of their property. I am trying to evaluate the development potential of the TMP 89-73A as PRD
vs. rezoned RA.
My questions:
• What effects will rezoning this 14 acre piece of PRD to RA have on the rest of the PRD that the 14-acre piece was
rezoned with (the Liberia property TMP 89-95) and was included in an application plan?
• Would it be possible, if the 14-acre piece is not rezoned, for the applicant to submit an application plan that meets the
requirements of section 8 for that 14-acre piece only, based on density and open space %from PRD,
incorporating it into the RA subdivision they plan around it?
• Amelia did a determination of development rights for TMP 89-73A and it is supposed to have 5 rts for a 29 acre
parcel. 14 acres of that parcel is PRD though, so do the development rights really only apply to
the half that is RA? How does that work?
I have all the files relating to this in my office if you need to look at them. My comments are due to Valerie Long today.
Joan said you might have a few minutes at 9:30 to talk about this. Please let me know if you can.
Thanks!
Rebecca
1